BATCHMAN-For Direct Activity Allocation
Hi,
We are using BATCHMAN to upload and external flat file of Direct Activity Allocation in SAP.
There is a limitation in BATCHMAN(T-Code) that in one file u cannot upload more than 300 records.
Can anyone help me is there any other transaction available to upload the data containing more than 300 records??
Please help. Full points will be rewarded.
Thanks
NTH
kb21n (cost center send to internal order)format:
You can go to transaction SE11, enter BAPIAAHDR and BAPIAAITM or the like in the Database table field, and click on Display.
BAPIAAHDR
CO_AREA POSTGDATE
3001 20071128
BAPIAAITM
CO_AREA SEND_CCTR REC_ORDER ACTTYPE ACTVTY_QTY
3001 0000002001 000000400252 SAP01 1
Similar Messages
-
BATCHMAN- Direct activity allocation
Hi,
We are using BATCHMAN to upload and external flat file of Direct Activity Allocation in SAP.
There is a limitation in BATCHMAN(T-Code) that in one file u cannot upload more than 300 records.
Can anyone help me is there any other transaction available to upload the data containing more than 300 records??
Please help. Full points will be rewarded.
Thanks
NTHHi
I did't found any TCODE like that. Custom program will have starting either Y or Z. If it is a custom program then with the help of ABAPer you can get the requirement.
VVR -
hi,
in KB21N, we can define allocation for cost center, prof segment, sales order or wbs.
i have few points need clarification.
1) in KO01, we also can define settlement rule for cost center. Why need to allocate using KB21N?
2) what is the difference between KB21N against allocation(assessment/distribution)?
thanks
rgdsSettlement Rule and assessment/distribution are done as part of periodic activity for moving cost from cost center/order to another cost object.
Whereas KB21N direct activity allocation is used for posting credit to the cost center based on the quantity information entered. Typically the timesheet of the labor time spent in the cost center for each activity is entered and the cost is transfered based on the same. -
About Direct activity allocations
When i m going for direct activety allocation in T.code KB21n,In this screen there is sender cost center ,activty type and reciving order,my sending cost center is 30100 and activites type is J00,and rec order is Consulting company A.
When i feed this data in kb21n and i save it but there is one error occured ,the error is :-
A master record for 30200/J00 exists only in 2008
Message no. KL002
Diagnosis
You want to use cost center 30200 together with activity type J00. For this combination, however, only one master data record was created in fiscal year 2008. The master record is defined in CCA during activity type planning.
Procedure
1. Create the master data record.
Activity type planning
2. Or, check your entries.
Plz guide me ITs urgent
Regards,
Pramod KulkarniHi,
Check your Cost Center and Activity type master data validity (like From Period & TO Period and Fiscal Year) and KP26 planning values for Cost Center and Activity type combination values for particular period and year.
If this helps you,please assign points.
Thanks,
Rau -
Direct Activity allocation posting error
Dear All,
In T.code - KB21N I tried to run the direct activity allocation. While enter the details in KB21N all the details picked from 3xxxxxxxxx document as it is reference document. In screen variant "Order" & Input type "Individual ". Document item price has assigned xxx INR. But controlling area currency is EUR. So the system picks constant exchange rate which is maintained in total price.
Can anyone tell where do we maintain total price per quantity for document item
Thanks...Hi,
We have maintained activity cost(Euro=Controlling area currency) in KP26. But the company code currency is INR. How the system picks INR value and which will be editable or not.
Thanks... -
Direct Activity Allocation-KB21N
Hi,
While i am doing the Direct Activity Allocation in KB21N,,From one cost center to another cost center...It is giving error like"CREATE MASTER DATA FOR 1101/1"
FOR UR INFORMATION :1101 IS COST CENTER
1-IS ACTIVITY TYPE
Give me the solution plzzz
REGARDS
Sap GuruHi,
Check whether you have created Cost center and activity type.
Aravind -
Direct Activity Allocation posting
Hi,
Is there a way to validate posting for activity type & order (order must be linked with activity type) in direct activity allocation (KB21N)?
Thank youyour question is not clear
check the link to understand the purpose of KB21n
kb21n overhead cost
Regards,
Divraj -
For direct activation of hierarchy, Aggregates have to be deactivated
Hi,
There are 2 monthly master data hierarchies loaded.
We face some problem while loading the hierarchies.
Now the 2 hierarchies are seen as Modified version.
When I try to activate the hierarchies manually I receive the below message
"For direct activation of hierarchy, 0042 Aggregates have to be deactivated"
with 2 options as:
1 Prebook activation
2 Activate directly
What are these options?
Will affect on aggregates?hi,
Activate directly wlll directly activate the hierarchy....
Prebook for activation will capture it and it will be activated later at the time of the chnage run.
Always prefer Prebook for activation...
hope this helps.
regards,
Mahesh
Edited by: Mony Maheshsingh on Jun 24, 2010 4:22 PM -
Difference between Direct activity allocation and internal activity allocat
Hello
I am pursuing SAP Management Accounting certification
Can somebody tell me what's the difference between direct activity allocation and internal activity allocation. Please give some example and also specifications as to cost element categorry, activity type, etc.
Asif
Moderator: Please, do not post certification queries. Regarding your issue, please, refer to help.sap.comHi,
Activity means e.g.. sales call, customer visit etc.
But service process means after you sale your product if some service related issue arrives then that is taken care by this transaction.
Inspire by rewarding.
Regards,
Nikhil -
Difference between Indirect & direct activity allocation?
Hello all,
please send any information on the subject. Thanks.
AshwiniDirect activity allocation is used when quantity is known for the work done e.g machine hours or time hours. Allocation is done via KB21n in CO.
Indirect activity allocation is used when quantity is not directly known and cost is allocated on the basis of statistical key figures e.g. number of employees. -
Define Cost Elements Range for Internal Activity Allocation
Dear All,
I have the following scenario, for SAP standard they have defined the Secondary Cost Elemenets 641000 - 641999 as the Internal Activity Allocation. I would like to ask where in SPRO configuration can I change this range with my own custom Secondary Cost Elements 400000 - 499999.
ThanksI have not come across any SAP standard number range. They are client specific.
Also your question regarding number range for Secondary cost elements is not clear. For creation of same you dont require any number range I suppose.
Number range in SPRO can be maintained in KANK
Regards,
Divraj -
ArchiveLink object (not DMS) for KB23N (Display Direct Activity Allocation)
Does anyone know the ArchiveLink object for KB23N for linking ArchiveLink (Scanned not SAP DMS) documents?
I can't seem to find a standard object in the object list so I thought I'd check here before attempt to create a custom ArchiveLink object for this area. There are a couple with similar names but configuring them doesn't enable the store business document option.Hi Athol,
We have observed that for MIGO transaction,the 'Store Business Document' option is disabled.Could you please let know how this can be enabled? We have serarched the forums,no inputs.Also,there is no indicator from the configuration side as well. -
Problem in indirect activity allocation to CO-PA (transaction KEG3)
Hi experts,
I am in process of testing indirect activity allocation (KEG3) to CO-PA.
Sender is cost center and activity.
Receiver - a set of characters like Co Code, Product and so.
Sender rule is Posted quantities.
Question - how is this sender quantity picked by system ...I mean the combination of cost center and activity....where to set it so that system picks the data.
I tried through confirmation to a prod order but that did not help as - in indirect activity allocation we use activities of category 2 and 3 which are not used in confirmation of prod order
Thanks,
SKDHi SKD ,
Can you please elaborate what logic is used for indirect activity allocation to COPA ..
Why are you transferring activities to COPA directly .. not to cost centers...whats the business logic .. and also let us know the parameters used in Indirect Activity Allocation cycle.. to answer your queries further
Regards
Sarada -
Hi all friend,
There are 3 type of activity allocation which I have confusion.
a) internal activity allocation - meaning i must use secondary cost element?
b) direct activity allocation
c) indirect activity allocation
Need help what is the difference for each of the above.
thank you.
help.sap.comInternal Activity Allocation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/35/289f319c4a1941e000080009927d9b/content.htm
Direct Activity allocation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/99/0159b69c9311d1a5820000e82de878/content.htm
InDirect Activity allocation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/66/bc6f7643c211d182b30000e829fbfe/content.htm
Srinivas -
Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing
Friends,
I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
1.Cost Component Structure
10 – Material
20 – Labour
30 – Diesel
40 – Electricity
2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
Labour – 2.0 HR
Diesel – 1.0 HR
Electricity – 5.0 HR
3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
Like;
1 E LAB10 994310 2.00 2.00 AED 1.0 HR Labour Cost New
2 E DIE20 994320 5.00 5.00 AED 1.0 HR Diesel Cost New
3 E ELE30 994330 1.00 1.00 AED 1.0 HR Electricity Cost
4 M 1100000042 5.00 0.00 AED 1 PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
5 G 994201 0.00 0.00 AED Depriciation Cost
6 G 994202 0.00 0.00 AED Sales & Distribution Cost
13.00 AED
4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67
2.67- AED
Note :- As per my understanding it should be
Labour Cost New 2.00
Diesel Cost New 5.00
Electricity Cost 1.00
5.Now after Process Order confirmation
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 00.00
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 4.00
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 5.00
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 2.00
16.00
6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
I have configured the system in below manner
1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
Product/Order
7.Assessment Cycle Details
Controlling Area 1000 Controlling Area
Cycle ZELE01 Status Reviewed
Start Date 01.01.2014 To 31.10.2014
Text Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
IND- Interactive
Assessment CEle 994215 Electricity Cost All
Sender
Cost Center CBAKYDXBAD
Cost Element 40204
Receiver
Cost Center CBAKYPDDXB
Tracing Factor
Var.portion type – Actual Activity
Selaction Criteria
Activity Type - ELE30
Receivers Tracing Factor
Cost Ctr Factor per 100
CBAKYPDDXB 100
8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
KSS2 Actual cost splitting
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB01 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE02 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE03 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb DIE20 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb ELE30 183.33
CBAKYPDDXB Production Dxb LAB10 183.35
1100.00
Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
OTy Object Name AUn Act Qty Total price Price (Fixed) PUnit
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 Production Dxb HR 5.0 366.66 366.66 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.65 916.65 10
ATY CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 Production Dxb HR 2.0 916.75 916.75 10
2200.06
2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
40002 RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED 1005/1100000042 5.00 5.00
40015 COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED 1005/4400000071 13.00- 13.00-
994310 Labour Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10 1.33 183.35
994320 Diesel Cost New CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20 3.33 183.33
994330 Electricity Cost CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30 0.67 183.33
2.67- 542.01
Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
Main issue is
Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
Thanks
Sagar ChinchkarDear Rajneesh,
I have made the changes as suggested....
It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
Structure Z1
Splitting structure for AT
Assignment 10
Electricity Cost
100
Allocation for ELE
Cost Element
994215
Activity Type
ELE30
Splitting Rule
100
Allocation for ELE
12
Activity quantity
Version 0
In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
Order 1 - QTY 2
Order 2 - QTY 1.1
Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
QTY 3.1 Tot Price 3,709.68 Planned(FIX) 3,709.68 Per Units 10
(System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
Order 1 - QTY 2 - 558.00
Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
Total - 965.57
4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
DIE20 - Actual confirmed Value 10 to 0
Which should not be the case....
PL Act Var
40002
RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
1005/1100000042
10.00
15.00
50.00
40015
COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
1005/4400000074
26.00-
26.00-
994201
Depriciation Cost
WMBDDEP01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994202
Sales & Distribution Cost
WMBDS&A01
1.00
0.00
100.00-
994310
Labour Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
4.00
0.00
100.00-
994320
Diesel Cost New
CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
10.00
0.00
100.00-
994330
Electricity Cost
CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
2.00
408.06
20,303.00
If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
What setting is required in current system.....
Million thanks in advance....
Regards
Sagar Chinchkar
Maybe you are looking for
-
[Solved] Unable to write to an external hard drive
Hi Everybody, I installed the Nov iso and plugged in my external hard drive. The mount command says: /dev/sr0 on /run/media/ly/WD SmartWare type udf (ro,nosuid,nodev,relatime,uid=1000,gid=100,umask=77,iocharset=utf8,uhelper=udisks2) /dev/sdb1 on /run
-
Fix for jittery jpeg images in FCE?
Hi, I recently created a 25th wedding anniversary video for a friend of mine. Basically, I used jpeg images to which I applied motion (slow zooms, pans, etc). I noticed that when I rendered the movie, I got some jitters through some of the edit point
-
Error: SUM_CREATE_ERROR
I am trying to "Assign Business Systems" using Services Without Party for the Idoc adapter. During "Create Communication Channels" I get an error SUM_CREATE_ERROR and communication channels are not created. Has anyone had the same problem. When I t
-
HT1600 update seems to be stuck
When I turned on my apple tv (first gen) it said a new update was available - it is still on step 1 and has been for over 2 hours what should I do - just wait?
-
Process for Annual Reports / Page Updates Etc....
Whats the best way to get the text in a document that is 20+ pages with text and images, like an annual report? Should I link the whole WORD file? Make a WORD file for each page? I want my client to be able to easily make text changes and resend a wo