BEA-000627 issue.. reached max pool capacity

I got this reached max pool capacity error msg shown below..
What is confusing to me is , how does the increment level become -ve... Shoudnt it be zero instead of -11 ?
<BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "aPool", making "-11" new resource instances instead of "5".>
Then a stack trace follows this error message saying
negativeArraySizeException, which is understandable becoz it is trying to increase the pool by -11.. The stack trace is shown below...
Has anyone seem anything like this ? Any thoughts ?
java.sql.SQLException: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.JDBCUtil.wrapAndThrowResourceException(JDBCUtil.java:209)
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getPoolConnection(RmiDataSource.java:316)
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:333)

pc cp wrote:
I got this reached max pool capacity error msg shown below..
What is confusing to me is , how does the increment level become -ve... Shoudnt it be zero instead of -11 ?
<BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "aPool", making "-11" new resource instances instead of "5".>
Then a stack trace follows this error message saying
negativeArraySizeException, which is understandable becoz it is trying to increase the pool by -11.. The stack trace is shown below...
Has anyone seem anything like this ? Any thoughts ?
java.sql.SQLException: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.JDBCUtil.wrapAndThrowResourceException(JDBCUtil.java:209)
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getPoolConnection(RmiDataSource.java:316)
at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:333)Certainly it's a bug, and likely already fixed. What version of weblogic is this?
Joe

Similar Messages

Outage with BEA-000627 Reached maximum capacity of pool

Hi , i am having an outage in the application and at the time of outage i am seeing a lot of <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > messages.
Now just before i am getting <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > i have seen messages of :
<BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "iemphsysOracleCP" closed.>
there are 45 such connection closing messages .
the initial capcity for connection is 25 and maximum capacity is 75 , 50 threads are allowed to run.
just after closing the connection by weblogic , i see only one message of connection created , but after that i see messages of reached maximum capacity.
The shirking is allowed and shrinking frequency is 900 secs, now the connections are closed when there are connections existing in the pool above the initial capacity and they are not being used, so weblogic closes the connection, in my problem the connections are closed and just after that one connection created and i see messages of reached maximum capacity , if connections are closed then these should be able to be created again and i shoud not see that maximum capacity message.
The test connections frequency is also 0 and testconns on reserve set to true , also testconnon release is true.
Remove infected connections is enabled.
how it can reach maximum capacity while just before that it is closing the connections ????

gaurav joshi wrote:
Hi , i am having an outage in the application and at the time of outage i am seeing a lot of <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > messages.
Now just before i am getting <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool > i have seen messages of :
<BEA-001128> <Connection for pool "iemphsysOracleCP" closed.>
there are 45 such connection closing messages .
the initial capcity for connection is 25 and maximum capacity is 75 , 50 threads are allowed to run.
just after closing the connection by weblogic , i see only one message of connection created , but after that i see messages of reached maximum capacity.
The shirking is allowed and shrinking frequency is 900 secs, now the connections are closed when there are connections existing in the pool above the initial capacity and they are not being used, so weblogic closes the connection, in my problem the connections are closed and just after that one connection created and i see messages of reached maximum capacity , if connections are closed then these should be able to be created again and i shoud not see that maximum capacity message.
The test connections frequency is also 0 and testconns on reserve set to true , also testconnon release is true.
Remove infected connections is enabled.
how it can reach maximum capacity while just before that it is closing the connections ????Hi. Can you tell me the version of WLS you're using, and also
show me the whole pool definition? There's no need for shrink.
I would recommend turning it off. I would set initial capacity
and max capacity to 50. I would turn off test-conn-on-release.
That is a waste of performance.
Joe

The reporting service web service connection pool reached the max pool size

I got a problem that it throw an exception "The timeout peroid elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connection was in use and max pool size was reached."
The satuation is our service use 15 thread to render report, but sometimes we met such exception I list above. I didn't change any configuration in rsreportserver.config, and it seems the connection to reportserver database from reporting service web
service was not disposed.
Is there any configuration I can modify to fix this issue?

Hi Dexter,
In your case, we can try to increasing the size of the connection pool to resolve the issue. By default, the Max Pool Size is 100. You can refer to the similar issue below:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c57c0432-c27b-45ab-81ca-b2df76c911ef/timeout-expired-the-timeout-period-elapsed-prior-to-obtaining-a-connection-from-the-pool?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
Since the issue is related with ADO.NET. I suggestion you post the question in the following forum:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=adodotnetdataproviders
It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
Regards,
Alisa Tang
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

SharePoint - Error_1_Error occurred in deployment step 'Add Solution': Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was rea

Hi,
I am Shanmugavel, SharePoint developer,
I am facing the below SharePoint 2013 deployment issue while deploying using VS2012.
If i will deploy the same wsp or existing wsp
(last build) using direct powershell deployment, the solution adding properly, but the same timeout exception coming while activation the features. Please find the below error.
I tried the below activists:
1. Restarted my dev server, DB server.
2. tried the same solution id different server
3. tried existing wsp file (last build version)
4. Deactivated all the features, including project Active deployment configuration.... but still i am facing the same issue.
I hope this is not coding level issue, because still my code is not start running, before that some problem coming.
Please help me any one..... Last two days i am struck because of this...

What you need to understand is the installation of a WSP does not do much. It just makes sure that you relevant solution files are deployed to the SharePoint farm.
Next comes the point when you activate the features. It is when the code which you have written to "Activate" certain features for your custom solution.
Regarding the error you are getting, it typically means that you have more connections (default is I guess 100) open for a SQL database then you are allowed to.
If you have a custom database and you are opening a connection, make sure you close it as well.
Look at the similar discussion here:
The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool
size was reached[^]
I would suggest further to look at the
ULS logs[^] to get better insight.
Manas Bhardwaj's Stream : www.manasbhardwaj.net

Bandwidth Utilization Avg or Max for capacity Planning best practice

Hello All - This is a conceptual or Non-Cisco product question. Hope you can help me to get this best industry practice
I am doing a Capacity planning for the WAN Link Bandwidth. To study the last month bandwidth utilization in the MRTG graph, i am seeing two values
Average
Maximum.
To measure how much bandwidth my remote location is using which value i have to use. Average or Max?
Average is always low eg. 20% to 30%
Maximum is continuous 100% for 3 hour in 3 different intervals in a day and become 60% in rest of the day
What is the best practice followed in the networking industry to derive the upgrade size of the bandwidth by using the Utilization graph
regards,
SAIRAM

Hello.
It makes no sense to use average during whole day (or a month), as you do the capacity management to avoid business impact due to link utilization; and average does not help you to catch is the end-users experience any performance issues.
Typically your capacity management algorithm/thresholds are dependent on traffic patterns. As theses are really different cases if you run SAP+VoIP vs. youtube+Outlook. If you have any business critical traffic, you need to deploy QoS (unless you are allowed to increase link bandwidth infinitely).
So, I would recommend to use 95-percentile of maximum values on 5-15 minutes interval (your algorithm/thresholds will be really sensitive to pooling interval, so choose it carefully). After to collect baseline (for a month or so) - go and ask users about their experience and try to correlate poor experience with traffic bursts. This would help you to define thresholds for link upgrade triggers.
PS: proactive capacity management includes link planning for new sites and their impact on existing links (in HQ and other spoke).
PS2: also I would recommend to separately track utilization during business hours (business traffic) and non-business (service or backup traffic).

Pooled capacity, machine work center can have labour?

Dear All,
1) We have eg. a common pool of welders for Location A and Location B welding work centers. How do we setup the pooled capacity and assign to them?
2) We have eg. 2 CNC machining work centers (Vert and Horiz) but we have labour support to do machine setup, labour related jobs etc. If we need to perform labour capacity planning in this machine-based work center, is this done by maintaining a separate work center for this labour support and assigned to the same Cost Center? Or for machine-based work center, labour capacity planning is not required?
Thank you for contributing.

Dear
We have eg. a common pool of welders for Location A and Location B welding work centers. How do we setup the pooled capacity and assign to them?
There is no differnce between pooled capacity and available caapcity .Only thing is you can utilised this capacity pool for various work centre level.
To do that , Goto - SPRO-Production -BAsic Data-Work center-Capacity Planning-Define Capacity categories -Create Capacity Categoery for common pool of welders , Create Capacity in CR11 and assing them into Work cetre Capaicty tab-Pooled Capacity Catogeries and maintian No of indivuial caapcity in Capacity Header -Standard Available caapcity-Indivual Capacity ( Total Number of welders with working timing , utilisation ) .
Quest2 : To address this issue , you can select Setup , Labour and Machine in Defalut tab of same Work centre with proper Standard Value Key .Now , as they are all part of the Production activity , so you can keep the same Cost Centre ( Production Cost Centre ) in the Work centre tab with Formula Key of Labour ,Machine and setup .Goto CR02-Default Tab and Costing tab .
Hope this is clear
regards
JH

Packet to client, reached max retries

Hi all!
I have a problem what I can't resolve.
I have 5 c861W router, and I configured to use WDS. It works fine.
but in the log I see this messages:
Apr 16 08:47:12: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station ****.****.**** Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2-CP]
Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-6-ROAMED: Station ****.****.**** Roamed to ****.****.****
Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station ****.****.****
Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client ****.****.**** reached max retries, removing the client
Apr 16 08:49:10: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station ****.****.**** Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2-CP]
Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-6-ROAMED: Station ****.****.**** Roamed to ****.****.****
Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station ****.****.****
Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client ****.****.**** reached max retries, removing the client
I tried what guides suggested, I checked the carrier test but all of the channels on 1-10%. I tried to set non overlapping channels as far as i can, and set fragment-threshold to 1024.
I have no idea what is the problem. I thing channels aren't noisy. Not just one client do this, don't think it is a client problem.
Something is missconfigured?
here is a config sample:
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption vlan 1 mode ciphers tkip
encryption vlan 100 mode ciphers tkip
ssid my_ssid
ssid my_ssid2
channel 2437
fragment-threshold 1024
station-role root
no dot11 extension aironet
any idea?
thank you!

I have a similar issue-see http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=General&topicID=.ee6e8b8&fromOutline=&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cd2aae9 for details.

"max-pool-size" what is it good for?

SCreator simple CRUD use:
After a while I get:
" Error in allocating a connection. Cause: In-use connections equal max-pool-size and expired max-wait-time. Cannot allocate more connection"
Which is odd, because its just me using the server/database. It looks like every tiime I run a test, another conection is lost.
Do I have to restart the server? Is there a way to say "its only me, reuse a single connection"
why does "connection pooling" make life harder?
Can I turn it of?
cheers
cts

I got the same error in my JSC project. I search for few days and i found the solution. I do a mistake in my page Navigation. I forgot a slash in <to-view-id>.
A bad example:
<navigation-rule>
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
A good example:
<from-view-id>/*</from-view-id>
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>page13</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/page13.jsp</to-view-id>
</navigation-case>
with this mistake, the afterRenderedResponse() was never called, and the ResultRowSet was never closed.
Korbben.

When I power up my Mac-Pro I only get a flashing file folder with a ? inside the folder. I suspect my hard drive is maxed to capacity can anyone help me as to what I should do?

When I power up my Mac-Pro I only get a flashing file folder with a ? inside the folder. I suspect my hard drive is maxed to capacity can anyone help me as to what I should do?

Whatever the problem is you no longer have a bootable system. You need to try reinstalling OS X.
Reinstall Snow Leopard without erasing the drive
1. Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions
Boot from your Snow Leopard Installer disc. After the installer loads select your language and click on the Continue button. When the menu bar appears select Disk Utility from the Utilities menu. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list. In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive. If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU and return to the installer.
If DU reports errors it cannot fix, then you will need Disk Warrior and/or Tech Tool Pro to repair the drive. If you don't have either of them or if neither of them can fix the drive, then you will need to reformat the drive and reinstall OS X.
2. Reinstall Snow Leopard
If the drive is OK then quit DU and return to the installer. Proceed with reinstalling OS X. Note that the Snow Leopard installer will not erase your drive or disturb your files. After installing a fresh copy of OS X the installer will move your Home folder, third-party applications, support items, and network preferences into the newly installed system.
Download and install Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1.
Reinstalling Lion/Mountain Lion Without Erasing the Drive
Boot to the Recovery HD: Restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the COMMAND and R keys until the menu screen appears. Alternatively, restart the computer and after the chime press and hold down the OPTION key until the boot manager screen appears. Select the Recovery HD and click on the downward pointing arrow button.
Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions: Upon startup select Disk Utility from the main menu. Repair the Hard Drive and Permissions as follows.
When the recovery menu appears select Disk Utility. After DU loads select your hard drive entry (mfgr.'s ID and drive size) from the the left side list. In the DU status area you will see an entry for the S.M.A.R.T. status of the hard drive. If it does not say "Verified" then the hard drive is failing or failed. (SMART status is not reported on external Firewire or USB drives.) If the drive is "Verified" then select your OS X volume from the list on the left (sub-entry below the drive entry,) click on the First Aid tab, then click on the Repair Disk button. If DU reports any errors that have been fixed, then re-run Repair Disk until no errors are reported. If no errors are reported click on the Repair Permissions button. Wait until the operation completes, then quit DU and return to the main menu.
Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion: Select Reinstall Lion/Mountain Lion and click on the Continue button.
Note: You will need an active Internet connection. I suggest using Ethernet if possible because it is three times faster than wireless.

I have reached full memory capacity on my 500GB Time Capsule. I am considering purchasing a 2TB Time Capsule. Do I need to resave all existing data on the new hard drive or can I start afresh? Or can I link both time capsules to operate independantly?

Hi,
I have reached full memory capacity on my 500GB Time Capsule. I am considering purchasing a 2TB Time Capsule.
a) Do I need to resave all existing data on the new hard drive or can I start afresh?
b) Or can I link both time capsules to operate independantly?
Thanks,
Paul

You may not need to buy a new Time Capsule.
You can connect a USB drive to the Time Capsule, and use it in addition to the TC's internal HD. You may need a powered USB hub as well.
Exactly what is on your TC? If it's only Time Machine backups, you may not need to do anything -- Time Machine will delete the oldest backup(s) automatically when it needs room for new ones. But if you have more than about 250 GB on your internal HD, that 500 GB may not be large enough to keep backups long enough.
If you have other data on the TC's internal HD, besides your backups, you could back up to the external HD and use the internal for the other data, or vice-versa. But TM backups cannot "span" two drives, and you shouldn't mix backups and other data on the TC's internal HD.

Pooled Capacity

Hello all,
At a client site am using Pooled capacity at Work centers(SAP resources) to help capacity planning with some pooled resources. So during planned order scheduling or in production(process) order the time required to complete the operation is higher than the Recipe(Route) time.
Eg: - Recipe time for operation at a Pooled Resource =10 min
Planned order or Production order time at that operation shows as 15 min
So the question is how does SAP read 10 min Recipe processing time & calculate 15 min as actual required time in Production( Process ) order.
I could not find any relevant SAP writeup on the pooled capacity concept & detailed sheduling being done.
So if anyone has been able to find more explanation from SAP on this will be appreciated.
Also please share your experience on scheduling using pooled capacity.
Thanks,
Ram

HI,
Assigning Pooled Capacities
Prerequisites
You can assign a pooled capacity to a work center
Pooled capacities can only be created independently from the work center in capacity maintenance. If you want to make a work center independent capacity a pooled capacity, set the Pooled capacity indicator in the General data section of the screen and then choose Enter
Procedure
Enter in the required capacity category in the capacity overview of the work center the name of the pooled capacity.
If the default capacity of a work station does not intend pooled capacities to be assigned, you can do this nonetheless:
Delete the capacity category by choosing Edit ® Delete.
Create a new capacity category by choosing Edit ® New entries.
Maintaining Scheduling Data
From any work center screen choose Goto ® Scheduling.
The Scheduling screen appears.
Enter the capacity with its capacity category whose execution time you want to use for scheduling. This can be either a work center capacity or a pooled capacity.
The capacity data must have already been entered in the work center.
Maintain formulas for operation segments (for production orders) or for internal processing time (for networks and maintenance orders).
If you do not enter a formula for an operation segment, the execution time of this segment is set to zero.
If you do not enter a formula for internal processing time, the duration in the network or maintenance order is used.
Via Extras ® Formula you can assign a formula constant a value and an unit, display a formula and test formulas
Maintain queue times and if necessary the dimension and units of measure for work in internal processing operations.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Tejas

Pooled capacity in SAP PS

Hi,
I would like to know, is it possible to use pooled capacity in SAP PS and how it really works.
Pls advise.
Regards
Raju

Hi Narayan........
Yes it is possible to use pooled Capacity in PS.........pooled capacity means the capacity which can be shared by several work centers at the same time. Whenecr you are creating a capacity in PS, just click on Pooled Capacity so that it will become pooled capacity. For your help.........go through this link also..........
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/89/a41d15461e11d182b50000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards..............

Material Transaction sequence reached max limit in Version 11.0.3

Problem Desc:
Oracle Applications Version 11.0.3
Material Transaction sequence reached max limit.
Material Transaction sequence got exhausted.
All the material transacted got stuck in AQ Process.
Material transactions done are pertaining to PO Receipts, Sub Inventory transfer, Inter Org transfer,
Could you please advice a solution.
Thanks and Regards
Aditya

Hello,
I had similar problem standard seq reached max limit. I could not book sales order. Solution from metalink was simple alter seq.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B13789_01/server.101/b10759/statements_6014.htm
MAXVALUE
Specify the maximum value the sequence can generate. This integer value can have 28 or fewer digits. MAXVALUE must be equal to or greater than START WITH and must be greater than MINVALUE.
Regards,
Luko

Sequence dependent setup (setuo matrix) with pooled capacity

Hi all,
We are facing a problem in the sequence dependent setup. We have a pooled capacity in ECC on which we want sequence dependent setup happening in APO. In APO orders are required to be scheduled on this resource and this resource is the primary resource. When I am trying to do the Detailed scheduling the time from the matrix is the one in which there is no predecessor.
Is sequence dependent setup not possible with pooled resource. Is it the standard system behaviour or am I missing something here.
Thanx for the help.

Insted of making pooled capacity you better try with alternate sequence.
system is behaving properly.

Creation of pooled capacity

Hi all,
I would like to create a new pooled capacity for resource X.
Please help me how to proceed?
Is there any place in customizing where we need to maintain it? Or do we need to configure it?Please provide me the steps.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Avinash

Hi,
You need to create the Pooled Capacity in T. Code : CR11.
Here enter your capacity category and Capacity.
Here you check the Pooled Capacity.
Now Create/Change Work ceter - Capacity Tab page:
If your default work center/default capacity does not allaow the Pooled Capcity then goto Edit and Delete the Capacity.
Now again Edit--> New Entrie, Enter the Capacity Category and Pooled Capacity just now creatd.
In the Capacity Over view you will get the Pooled Capacity Checked and new capacity for you.
Hope this helps to create the pooled capacity.
Revert for further discussion.
Regards,
Siva

BEA-000627 issue.. reached max pool capacity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for