Billing Actual Cost

Hi Gurus,
I have created the scheduling agreement with my customer for 100000 quantity of goods. Customer sends me the releases through EDI which I update in my FRC schedule. In FRC header there are two fields one for the Go ahead Production Date and other for Go ahead procurement Date.
According to SAP if the customer changes any quantity within the Go ahead Production date then customer has to pay the total cost of the quantity ordered in previous release. This scenario is simple to configure in SAP it is very straight forward.
Now, if the requirement within the Go ahead procurement date then customer is liable to pay only cost of the goods procured and not the production cost. How to map this scenario in SAP.
Thanks in advance.
Mayank Gada

Hi Sreekanth /Keshav,
Thanks a lot for your responses.
Yes, I have checked my Cost Element in KA03 and found that the cost element category maintained for the same is 11 u2013 Revenues, hence it was giving me the message. I have user the cost element with categoty 1 and it is working with no messages.
One quick check here-
Can we use secondary cost element for actual cost transfer (from WBS to WBS) via any t-code like KB61, KB15N, KB51N etc?
Regards,
Sumanth

Similar Messages

  • Double actual cost in Profitability Analysis for cancelled billing doc

    Dear expert
    Say we have a billing doc posted in May, and we run ML closing and KE27 during month end closing, which transfered actual cost from material ledger to value field in PA.
    In June, we cancelled that billing document, the question is why the system automatically posted actual cost of cancelled billing docs to value field in PA right away (without KE27)?
    The reason I asked is because when we run KE27 for June closing, the SAP transfer again actual cost from material ledger to value field in PA. So we will have double posting of actual cost for cancelled billing document
    Please help, which setting did I missed to prevent SAP automatically posted actual cost of cancelled billing docs to value field in PA right away (without KE27)?
    Thx

    Hi
    Thats because you had double +ve also..
    Let me u/s your situation better
    1.PGI Posted COGS of Say, 100
    2. KE27 posted, say, addnl 20
    So, total COGS is now 120
    3. You posted a reversal now... It should post -100 and not -120.... Is it posting -120?
    Run KE27 for this month and see if it really posts -120 again... If it does, raise an OSS message to SAP... They are liable to help
    In my opinion, there is no Config set up for this... At best, you can try to assign different VF in KE4R for PV = 02 as compared to PV=01 and see if it helps
    br, Ajay M

  • PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

    Hi,
    I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
    Regards,
    Bill

    Hi Bill,
               There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
    hope this helps ,

  • Actual cost of material in COPA

    Hi Team,
    We have implemented PP, CO & COPA  our client has the requirement to see the actual cost of material in COPA as per their requirement we designed the KE30 report as product wise profitability report in that report we used the record types B( direct postings from FI), C(Order settlement), D(over head cost) from the copa assessment cycle & F ( SD billing).
    1) Is it possible to see the actual cost of material( Including activity cost) in copa.
    2) If it is possible please advise.

    Hello
    It is not possible to get the actual cost of the material in COPA. Actual cost can only be derived if you implement material ledger.
    However in COPA we may come close to actual cost to some extent. The following configuration needs to be done:
    1. Run standard cost estimate every month so that the price reflects the most recent material prices.
    2. Define assessment cycles for auxiliary cost centers (whose cost should form part of inventory cost) to production cost centers.
    3. Configure for splitting and revaluation at actual price.
    4. Take the production variances to COPA.
    5. Create a report to show the standard cost and variances.
    One of the difference is that the total standard cost is for the quantities sold during the period however the variances will be for the quantities produced during the period.
    Another difference is that the unabsorbed overheads could not be allocated to individual materials.
    Hope this helps.
    Sangram

  • We want to post actual cost through statistical WBS elements.

    when we do the posting on Costcenter assigned to a Statistical WBS element (2nd level), I was in the opinion that, the actual cost posted on the Costcenter of statistical WBS (2nd level) will reflect to the top WBS element (which is non-statistical in 1st level).
    But, I cannot able to see the actual cost in the 1st level WBS which also a Billing element (with this, finally we want to  do the Resource Related Billing).
    So expalin me how to bring actual cost posted on the costcenter of a Statistical WBS, to top WBS element which is non-statistical.

    U can book the actual cost from Procurement Cycle or by direct Invoice posting using FI transaction.
    Procurement Cycle:
    When you create PR or PO user Account Assignment Q or P and maintain WBS element. When u do GR or service entry actual cost is captured on the Project (WBS element).
    Using FI Transaction:
    When there is no PO and to book the cost u can use  F-43  to post actual cost (via Invoice) and mention WBS element.
    U can check the Actual Cost using Line item report CJI3 or S_ALR_87013532.
    Venkat

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

    Hi,
    I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

    Hi Sanjay Ram,
    Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
    So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
    Regards..
    Jose

  • CJE0 REPORT actual cost is inaccurate

    Hi,
    Working on customer projects.
    We are booking the costs from MM flow and milestone billing through SD.   In the report, they are showing correctly.
    But, When we are making FI entry through FB60 or F-02  posting to WBSE, in the report, system is deducting from the actual revenue and is not adding to actual cost. 
    The costs should be added to actual cost in the report.
    Any configuration is missing in this case or is it product error?
    Please suggest for the same.
    Thanks
    Satya

    Hi Satya,
    when you define cost element you define if it is a cost element category 1 ( primary cost/reducing revenue) or cost element category 11 ( revenue).
    I suppose you are using cost element category 1 then It appears in cost column.
    If you need it appears in Revenue column you should use cost element categor 11.
    Regards,
    Clara

  • What is the actual cost of these plans?

    What is the actual cost of these plans?
    * $59.99 a month for 450 minutes
    * $79.99 a month for 900 minutes
    * $99.99 a month for 1,350 minutes
    Although they will very, Answers welcome from anyone in the USA. So I can have and idea of the cost with taxes and fees. I am located in both LA and NYC. I currently have a NYC number with Verizion using the 450 minutes plan. The plan cost $39.99 before taxes and fees and $48.42 after taxes and fees.
    Breakdown of Monthly Access Charges:
    450 minute plan: $39.99
    Verizon Wireless' Surcharges and Other Charges & Credits: $3.31
    Taxes, Governmental Surcharges & Fees: $5.12
    Total Current Charges: *$48.42*

    My plan total is $84.99/month, then with taxes and fees it comes to $93.40 each month as the total bill. The biggest fee is the state sales tax, at just over $5 on my last bill. Then the 911 fees, fed regulatory fees, and all that are a few bucks each.
    My plan -
    450 Minute (required) $39.99
    Unlimited Data (required) $30
    1500 Text msgs (optional) $15
    Total = $84.99

  • Actual Cost in Sales order

    Hi,
    I am running a Unit Cost in my Sales Order. I ran the cost estimate and got the Plan cost. How would I get the Actual Cost? Subsquently I want to settle the Cost in PSG. In settlement with TCode VA88, it is showing no sender selected.
    Please share the answer.
    Regards
    Ashish

    Hi
    Have you completed billing of the sales order ? if not please bill the same and then try ot settle you can check the status of posting in report KVBI.

  • Actual Cost & Actual Revenue

    Dear Sir,
    Can you please tell me what Actual Cost & Actual Revenue & also what is difference between Actual cost & Actual Revenue.
    Regards,
    Gagandeep Singh.

    Hi,
    IN any project you incur some expenses and at the same time when you sell something you generate revenue. But in the intitial stages you cant say what is the actual cost that you are going to incur or what is the actual revenue you are going to generate at a certain point/phase in a project.
    Actual Cost refers to for eg. suppose you procure a bearing for your project. You will create a PR and then a PO. Until this stage system will treat this as a commitment. Once you do the GR/ GI this cost is converted to actual cost. Similarly lets say that you are building a ship and you have procured some components to build that ship. That procurement will lead to a cost because you are incurring some expenditures. Once you build that ship and sell it and bill the customer you will generate revenue. Till the time you receive the payment/revenue from your customer system treats this as Planned revenue. Once you bill your customer and receive the payment system will treat this is as the actual revenue.
    So basically Actual Cost refers to the expenditures incurred in carrying out a project and Actual revenue refers to the income generated after billing the customer and receiving the payment for the goods sold.
    Its just a basic explanation but hope this clears your query.
    Best Regards,
    Gokul

  • MOH treated as COS actual costs are shown as WIP in RA method 14 (DIP)

    Hi,
    We have an issue with RA. We are using RA method 14 (Derive Cost of Sales from Resource-Related Billing of Dynamic Items).
    When the status of the Service Order is REL and when we execute the RA the actual costs booked are treated as WIP and the
    Material overheads are shown under Cost of Sales.
    Could you please let me know how to control the customisation on the MOH so that system can treat the MOH as WIP only when the status of the order is REL? Thanks for your help.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

    Hi,
    Any help on this?
    Thanks for your time.
    Kind Regards
    Umapathi G

  • Actual Costing-ML

    Sirs
    My client wants to activate ML/Actual costing.
    Basic configuration steps I know and help is also available on the forum. Here my question is that:
    What kind of working discipline needs to be maintained to use these functionality so as to get good results? Also please guide what are the pros and cons of using ML/Actual costing?
    Best regards
    Shalabh Shastri

    Hi,
    Please go through the below link, & let me know if any more quires apart of from this.
    Discipline required when using Material Ledger/ Actual Costing
    http://scn.sap.com/message/15326883#15326883
    The following Decipline need to follow when ML is Active
    I
    ML is to arrive Actual Costing for SFG/FG Material which is activated for ML (S-3)
    II
    1st decipline has to be followed @Material Master Level which will address to All ML Activites
    III
    Every Goods movment will effect to the respective month end to Calculate Actual Cost
    1.All Goods Receipts & Invoice Receipts should puch for respective month
    2.All Production Confirmation & Completion of Order to be happed
    3.All Delivery & Billing to the  respective month should happen
    4.All Sales return has to be moved from returnSTOCK to Unresticted
    5.All FI-Cost has to book to respective Cost Centers
    IV
    Actualization of Cost (Prices diffrence) will settled to respective product @month end based upon the sales(charge off) has happened
    V
    Once atcual posting ML activities has happened *No Goods movment will happen "Provided ML will get reversed"
    Regd,
    Khan.

  • Service Order Actual costs and revenue

    Hi,
    Can you please let me know how to find actual costs and revenue related to service orders?
    what tables to go to?
    We are planning on going back to a service order from the billing document and get the actual labor costs.
    Thanks,
    MS

    Hi Mahesh,
    Thank you very much for that quick response.
    EKKO is for purchasing documents. Can you please let me know how to use it for my service order?
    Thanks,
    Maulik Shah

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

Maybe you are looking for