BINARY_RELATION_CREATE Relation Type

Hi..
I am using FM BINARY_RELATION_CREATE in which I want to Store Business Document in MIGO. I saw some relationship type which are VONA and ATTA but it is used for Quotation and Attachment respectively.
Please help where can I find or if you know the correct RelationType for Storing Document.
Thanks!!!
regards,
Roy Anthony

OFFD is used to link an object with role APPLOBJ with an object with role OFFDOC
your order should be the first and your document the second
I think it could work as-is because APPLOBJ role is now GOSAPPLOBJ and this new role is linked to all object types
see view cluster MVCSOBLBREL (with transaction SM34)

Similar Messages

OIM Email notification in Provisioning Related Type in Email Template

Hi,
I have done the Email Notification for the RequestRelated type in the EmailTemplate where a Resource is granted to a user and the mail goes to a particular User or Group in the Assignment Tab of the Process task. Its ok.
Now I want to do for the Provisioning related type specified in the Email Template.I tried to attach my Mail Template in the provisioning task related to a particular Resource but mail is not generating .
Can anyone briefly tell me How to generate mail for the Provisioning Related type ?????

Have you attached the email definition in the Notification tab of the provisioning task?
Also, you need to be sure if the task status was reached to start the email notification.
Regards,
Nitto

IC WebClient BOL - Relation Type

Hi,
When creating new BOL for IC WebClient: Object, Relationship name, cardinality of the source and the assigned object, Relation type has to be assigned.
Relation type is not mandatory. There are three different types of Relation type:
<b>A   Association
B   Composite
C   Aggregation</b>
Can anyone please explain these three different types of relation type?
Thanks,
Shankar

Hi Shankar,
wikipedia has some good explanations for these terms:
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_%28object-oriented_programming%29">Association</a>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_composition#Aggregation">Aggregation (a special kind of compostion)</a>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_composition">Compositon</a>
Regards
Mathias

Enhance CIC - allow custom relation type

Hello,
I am trying to enhance the CIC WinClient in a CRM 5.0 system. When you have a BP open, you have a button to quickly add a new contact person. We already enhanced the popup with several custom fields by implementing the Badi IF_EX_CRM_IC_BP_SEARCH / CRM_IC_BP_SEARCH, but now I also want to give the user the option of specifying the relation type in which the BP and the CP are linked, and not only have the default BUR001.
With debugging I have found that in FM BUPR_CONTP_CREATE the relation is defined with a constant,
LS_BUSRDIINIT-RELTYP = GC_RELTYP_CONTACTP
This FM is called ultimately called from a FM LCRM_CIC_BP_SUBU35 which is outside the Badi implementation (meaning we have already left the Badi with END METHOD).
Since I am kinda new to ABAP development, is there another Badi anybody knows that I could implement here, or would I have to copy basically the whole CIC into a Z namespace? I was asked to not use modifications here...
Thanks!
Thomas

Hi Rahul,
Please see my responses, they might help...
http://forums.sdn.sap.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1923438&messageID=10138718#10138718
Regards,
BJ

Unable to add Content-Type=multipart/related; type="text/xml";

hi all
am trying to add the following to my soap message that include attachment
but its not working
Content-Type=multipart/related; type="text/xml";
boundary="----=_Part_0_14732323.1039686671216";
Content-Length=4259;
can any body help plzzzzzzzz

Hello again,
My solution works and does not work. Content type is ok, but strange characters appear to the end of the attachment data.
Like this
...</E1EDS01></IDOC></ORDERS01>H úãž6×½ ã½5Õ×¼ÛgžÛNÝ}þ[ëMu201E
Where did these come from? I tested in a way that I changed the ContentType back to application/xml and attachment is fine again.
Regards,
Pekka

How can I check an object is an instance of any type within an array of related types?

In LabVIEW, it's possible to check the runtime type of an object using To More Specific Class.vi. One usage of this would be to perform a safety check if some kind of class uses instances of another kind of class but is only able to handle a subset of that class' child types.
For instance, let's say you had Beverage.lvclass, which represents an abstract type of product, and several subclasses: Coffee.lvclass, Tea.lvclass and Soda.lvclass.
We also have a Person.lvclass which can drink beverages. A person also has preferences about the drinks they do or do not like:
Attached is an implementation of this in LabVIEW.
In Person.lvclass : Drink.vi, I have the following code. For whatever reason the wire appears broken in these snippets but it's all fine in the actual code.
In Scenario.vi, I have the following code:
What I'm finding is that no error is generated and instead I get "Yum, I love tea!", "Yum, I love coffee!" and "Yum, I love soda!". My guess is that To More Specific Class.vi casts to the static type of the "target class" input wire rather than its runtime type - and because I'm passing in elements from an array of types, the wire's static type is upcasted to the most specific type that is a superclass of the types in the array - which would be Beverage.lvclass. And so the cast is trying to determine if an object of static type Beverage.lvclass is an instance of Beverage.lvclass, which will of course be the case all the time.
Is there any way to make LabVIEW check against the most specific runtype type of an object? As in, is there something I could do that, in this example case, would allow me to get the required behaviour of Joe throwing an error when he's made to drink soda? Or is this another limitation of LabVIEW that I'm going to have to live with?
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
TypeCastingExample.zip ‏64 KB

tst wrote:
Your guess seems reasonable. I can't check right now, but there's a primitive called preserve run time type, which should do what you want.
Cheers, that seems to have got it! I've never really looked at Preserve Run-Time Class before, but it seems to do the right thing.

Create Relation Type ContactPartner with own Relationtype

Hi everybody,
i copied the relationtype BUR001 (Contact Partner) into the Type ZUR001. Now when I create a new Contact Partner with a new bol-Object
lv_fac = lv_core->get_entity_factory( 'BuilContactPerson' ).
lr_builcontactperson = lv_fac->create( lt_param ).
and save the created relationship, i have a new entry in BUT050 and BUT051 with the Rel.Type BUR001. How can I change the Type to my ZUR001?
Can anyone help me?
Thanks,
Sebastian

Not possible.

Relation type 'is purchaser of'

Dear SAP experts,
I'm interested to see that it is possible in SRM to make assignment to organization to be more flexible as in this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/2c/867d3ca2156c6ae10000000a114084/content.htm
We think that we can use this in our system. However I really dont understand the explanation saying that we have to :
1. activate the BADI in SRM Server --> Business-Add-Ins (BAdIs) --> Interface Configuration --> Input Helps and Search Helps --> Display of Input Helps, Search Helps and Favorites,
2. configure in SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Message Control --> Influence Message Control
What i confuse about is the lack of clarify of:
1. What to be activated in BADI? Do we just need to activate without coding anything?
2. What to configure in 'Influence Message control' ? As I can only see the business object such as PO and Shopping Cart, and nothing to do with the org structure?
Best regards,
John

Hello RD,
You can do it in PPOMA_BBP itself from "Purchaser Assignment" view for the Purchasing_Group.
Please refer to OSS note, 836262.
However, after following the steps mentioned in the Note, you will not find the purchaser user assigned to the Purchasing group in PPOMA_BBP itself (where the default view would be "Staff Assignment" view). He would be still assigned to the other business org unit.
But in BUB3, when you display the available 'Relationship' for the purchase_user's BP number, you would find a new 'Is Employee of' relation to the Purchaing_Group (in addition to the business org unit which he already had).
Then the purchase_user should be able to perform purchaser activities according to the ROLE assingment.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks
Jude
Points for useful hints, please....

Where to assign the relation type PRDBP in customizing.

Hi,
I am working in CIC0. In Accounts,I am searching an object with serial number .I will get a list of product ID's as search result. When I select one product ,In the Partner field i am getting a text as Partner not bound.
When I debugged the program,I found that system is checking the database table comm_il_prdbp for relationship type PRDBP.Since entry is not there in this table,this text is shown.Can anyone help me out by providing details of where to assign this relationship of partner and product in customizing.
Thanks in advance,
Gincy.

This relationship is assigned at the the category level in comm_heirarchy transaction..

OSB defaulting Content-Type to "multipart/related" in case of attachments

I have scenario where I need to invoke a REST Webservice from OSB which accepts only media types which has "multipart/atom+xml". OSB is used for protocol transformation converting the SOAP request into the HTTP POST request with multipart. I have Proxy Service which will unwrap the message from the SOAP Body and post the same message into the payload of the Business Service and the attachment is passed 'as is' from the SOAP Service. The external REST Service Provider expects the media type to be "multipart/atom+xml", but in OSB when an attachment is present in the message, OSB is overrding the "Content-Type" proeprty to "multipart/related" inspite of me setting the "Content-Type" property of HTTP Transport Header in OSB and as result external RESTFUL Service is throwing "415-Unsupported Media Type" error. Below is the test results. One interesting thing is, it happens only when there is attachment present in the message. In case of a message which doesn't have attachment any "Content-Type" specified in the Transport Header is passed by the OSB to the external service. Any help is highly appreciated.
OSB Transport Header
Added the header <http:Content-Type>multipart/atom+xml</http:Content-Type>
Actual Raw Message
POST http://xxx7200:7004/XXXInterfaces/identify HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/plain"; start="<Root_-328322390>"; boundary=MIME_Boundary; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Java1.6.0_17
Host: xxx7200:7004
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, */*; q=.2
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 4823
Expected Raw Message
POST http://xxx7200:7004/XXXInterfaces/identify HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/atom+xml; boundary=MIME_Boundary;
User-Agent: Java1.6.0_17
Host: xxx7200:7004
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, */*; q=.2
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 4803
-KC
Edited by: 799459 on Apr 8, 2011 5:36 AM
Edited by: 799459 on Apr 8, 2011 7:02 AM
Edited by: 799459 on Apr 8, 2011 7:13 AM
Edited by: 799459 on Apr 8, 2011 7:14 AM

HTTP content-type header has the following limitation as per osb doc.
Oracle Service Bus run time may overwrite these headers in the binding layer when preparing the message for dispatch. If these headers are modified, $inbound and $outbound are updated accordingly. So what you are seeing may be working as designed. Cant the remote service accept the multi part related content type set up by osb ?

Oracle Service Bus: Content Type is defaulted to "mutlipart/related"

I have scenario where I need to invoke a REST Webservice from OSB which accepts only media types which has "multipart/atom+xml". OSB is used for protocol transformation converting the SOAP request into the HTTP POST request with multipart. I have Proxy Service which will unwrap the message from the SOAP Body and post the message via Business Service and the attachment is passed 'as is' from the SOAP Service. The external REST Service Provider expects the media type to be "multipart/atom+xml", but in OSB when an attachment is present in the message, OSB is overrding the "Content-Type" property to "multipart/related" inspite of me setting the "Content-Type" property of HTTP Transport Header in OSB and as result external RESTFUL Service is throwing "415-Unsupported Media Type" error. Below is the test results. One interesting thing is, it happens only when there is attachment present in the message. In case of a message which doesn't have any attachment "Content-Type" specified in the Transport Header is passed by the OSB to the external service. Any help is highly appreciated.
OSB Transport Header
Added the header <http:Content-Type>multipart/atom+xml</http:Content-Type>
Actual Raw Message
POST http://xxx7200:7004/XXXInterfaces/identify HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/plain"; start="<Root_-328322390>"; boundary=MIME_Boundary; charset=UTF-8
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Java1.6.0_17
Host: xxx7200:7004
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, /; q=.2
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 4823
Expected Raw Message
POST http://xxx7200:7004/XXXInterfaces/identify HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/atom+xml; boundary=MIME_Boundary;
User-Agent: Java1.6.0_17
Host: xxx7200:7004
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, /; q=.2
Proxy-Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 4803
-KC

There is no explicit option to disable the check on the XML content.
But the you can use Messaging Service of type Text request which will consider the data as string and so there will be no check.
If you want to use WSDL/AnyXML/AnySOAP proxies, the XML check is always carried when the $body varaible is not checked/modified when content streaming is enabled while creating the proxy. I'm quite sure HTTP transport supports content streaming and the stream from the input is directly given to BS with out realizing the XML. Only short coming is it should be a pure pass through and no data enrichment and any action in pipeline that requires realizing the XML from the stream.
Let me know if this helps.
Thanks
Manoj

Need information/documentation related to ADFx function type

Hi Guru's,
We have a requirement to invoke external ADF application from EBS/OAF R12.1.3.
Form the forum sources, I found that we can make use of "ADFx" function type in R12.1.3 to invoke external ADF URL.
We need to pass some parameters while we invoke the ADF URL.
Please help me with any dev guide/documentation on the usage of ADFx function type.
Any help in this regard would be a great help!!
Thanks!!
Subba.

hI patil
check tadir table for all related types of objects...
reward points to all helpful answers
kiran.M

How to get the Useru2019s position when the user doesnu2019t have CP relation

We have a custom program which will add / delete attributes (In transaction PPOSA_BBP). It is working fine for users which were assigned with CP relation But it fails for users which doesnu2019t have CP relation (since we are getting the position of users form HRP1001 then we are retrieving the existing attributes based on the position after that updating the attributes) as we are getting the position from HRP1001 it fails for users were no CP relation.
Help us how to get the Useru2019s position when the user doesnu2019t have CP relation. Suggest us any function module or how to query the HRP1001 or some other table if exists
Regards
Paul

Hi Paul,
Have a look at these tables.
Using table BUT000 the central business partner data are stored, f.e. partner type, partner names, partner number, partner guid, person number, etc. In table BUTBKK the bank data to a business partner are stored.
Central business partner address data
The table ADRC is used for the address of a business partner. Table BUT020 links the business partner number with the address number. Using table BUT021 several addresses to a business partner with different usages (modes), f.e. correspondence or delivery address, can be stored. The personal data of a business partner person are stored with key person number in table ADRP. The person number is assignd to a business partner person in table BUT000. Communication data of business partners as e-mail, telephone, fax, etc. are stored in the tables ADDR1 u2013 ADDR12. The business address of a contact person or an employee consists of the organization address (company resp. org.-unit) and of an address addition, which describes f.e. a building, a room number, etc. The address addition is stored in table ADCP and is identified by the keys address number of the organization address and person number.
Relationships between business partners
Table BUT050 contains the relationships between a business partner organization and a business partner person using relation types. The relation types are defined in table TBZ9, f.e. the relation type u2018has employeeu2019 corresponds to identifier u2018BUR010u2019, the relation type u2018has contact personu2019 corresponds to identifier u2018BUR001u2019. Table BUT051 stores communication data of a contact person relationship (compare to table ADCP). Table BUT052 stores several address numbers to one business partner relationship (including a standard flag).
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

ABT1N Intercompany Asset Transfer error: AA390   T type 230 not possible

Dear experts,
I am trying to post an intercompany asset transfer with trx code ABT1N but when simulating the error code
Transaction type 230 not possible (posting to affiliated company) appears. This is the explanation of the error:
Message no. AA390
Diagnosis
     For the current document, you specified either implicitly (via the
     customer/vendor), or explicitly (with a manual entry), that this posting
     is to an affiliated company. In this case, Asset Accounting requires you
     to use special transaction types. This enables the system to separately
     identify such transactions.
I do not understand the error because TType is "Retirement to affiliated company with revenue" so should be correct.
Does anybody know what could be wrong?
Cheers

Hi
Firstly, check out Note 209643.
Secondly, please read the long text of the error message again. The
transaction type must be set as "post to affiliated company". And
you must check back the followings :-
1. Please execcute function: SAP IMG -> FI -> asset accounting ->
    transaction -> specify default transaction type.
    You can find the default transaction type for "retirement from
    inter-company transfer" and "acquisition from inter-company
    transfer".
Then check in their definition whether they are relevant to
    affiliated company.
If they are NOT RELEVANT to affiliated company, you can
    substitute them with other transaction type Relevant to affiliated
    company.
2. Please check the definition of transfer variant. In the transfer
    variant, you have assigned the transaction type for both retirement
    and acqusition for relation type 1. Both transaction types should be
    set as "post to affiliated company" .
Please note that the abovementioned points must be checked because
the system logic will check the validity of the default value in
Point 1.
Then the transaction type in the point 2 will be used instead and
re-checked again.
Have you try to use 'No Reveune' in the specification for revenue?,
I think if it is afflicated companies, you are not allowed to use
revenue.
This error can also be produced because a wrong definition of the trans-
fer variants. Please have a look on note 327088 for further details.
Most of the issues on this matter were solved with this last Note.
Cheers, Blaz

Help on Index creation on complex type

Hi:
I have some problem in creating indexes on columns related to complex types.
Here is the steps performed
1)
I registered a schema with complextypes. The relevant part of the schema is as below:
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified">
     <xs:element name="ProteinEntry" type="ProteinEntryType"/>
     <xs:complexType name="ProteinEntryType">
          <xs:sequence>
               <xs:element name="header" type="headerType"/>
               <xs:element name="protein" type="proteinType"/>
               <xs:element name="organism" type="organismType"/>
          </xs:sequence>
          <xs:attribute name="id" type="xs:ID" use="required"/>
     </xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="organismType">
          <xs:sequence>
               <xs:element ref="source"/>
               <xs:element ref="common" minOccurs="0"/>
          </xs:sequence>
     </xs:complexType>
</xs:schema>
2) I registered this schema and I created a table "bioseq" of xmltype based on the schema.
3)when i do a describe of bioseq I get the following:
SQL> desc bioseq
Name Null? Type
TABLE of SYS.XMLTYPE(XMLSchema "http://accelrys.com/pir_edited_pir3.xsd" Element "ProteinEntry") STORAGE Object-relational TYPE "ProteinEntryType551_T"
4) when I do a describe of "ProteinEntryType551_T" I get the following :
SQL> desc "ProteinEntryType551_T";
"ProteinEntryType551_T" is NOT FINAL
Name Null? Type
SYS_XDBPD$ XDB.XDB$RAW_LIST_T
id VARCHAR2(4000)
organism organismType511_T
reference reference552_COLL
desc "organismType511_T" gives the following:
SYS_XDBPD$ XDB.XDB$RAW_LIST_T
source VARCHAR2(4000)
common VARCHAR2(4000)
What I want to do is create an index on the column source. I tried several syntaxes but failed. Is it possible to do this.
Sudhakar

Look at the Whitepaper on XML DB and the latest version of the XML DB Demo. It shows how to do this.

BINARY_RELATION_CREATE Relation Type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for