BIW with SRM&TAX calculation

hi everybody,
i have some doubts in SRM.
1) where & how we calculate the TAX calculation in SRM?
2) how & where we get the BIW reports in SRM?what kind of reports they are.
pls anybody can send me detailed solutions for above.pls put an eye on this issue. ok
bye bye
warmregards
rakhi

1) It depends on how your firm implements tax calculation. Some firms use external software to do the tax calculations. You can configure Tax Calculation under IMG in SRM system path SRM->Cross Application Basic Settings->Tax Calculation->Determine System for tax calculation.

Similar Messages

Oracle AP: With Holding Tax Calculated wrongly

Dear Pros...
Pls help with regards to the following...
We want Oracle to APPLY Witholding tax at Payment time and create withholding invoice at payment time
Following is our setup:
In Payable Options window: Witholding Tax Tab
Use Witholding Tax = Check
Allow Manual Witholding = Check
Witholding amount basis:
Include Tax amount = Check
Apply Witholding Tax:
At Payment Time = Check
Create Witholding Invoice :
At Payment Time = Check
Total Invoice Amount to be processed = 100
Our desired result should be the following double entry
@ Invoice entry time
DR Expense 100
Cr     Liability                100
@ payment time…..we want system to do the following entry
DR   Liability     100
CR     CASH            95
CR WITHOLDING TAX    5
BUT
INSTEAD OF DOING ABOVE DOUBL ENTRY…….
ORACLE IS DOING FOLLOWING DOUBLE ENTRY
@ Invoice entry level (same as desired)
DR Expense 100
Cr     Liability                100
@ Invoice Payment level (Oracle is deducting extra tax and debiting liability with 105) which we don’t want
Dr Liability   105
CR   Cash                           100
CR Witholding Tax                  5
PLS Help....!

Hi,
In your initial post you mention this option in Payables Options:
Total Invoice Amount to be processed = 100
Where do you find this option?
Octavio

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

Tax Calculation in TAXINN procedure

Hi Seniors,
I know TAXINN procedure is condition based. But in FTXP while defining new tax codes, should i give value for the condition types there or need to create condition record in FV11 for all condition types ?? what are the condition types need to maintained for tax coces ? what is the difference between maintaining tax codes in TAXINJ and TAXINN ? Kindly explain me please.
Thanks&Regards,
Jana

Hi,
TAXINJ is a tax calculation procedure for country version India and it supports formula-based excise determination. You need to configure this tax calculation procedure
Excise Conditions
§         JMOD   IN: A/R BED
§         JNED    IN: A/R NCCD
§         JAED    IN: A/R AED
§         JSED    IN: A/R SED
§         JCES    IN: A/R Cess
§         JECS    A/R Educational CESS
LST/CST/VAT Conditions
§         JIN1      IN: A/R CST
§         JIN2      IN: AR LST
§         JIN4      IN: A/R CST Surcharge
§         JIN5      IN: AR LST Surcharge
§         JIN6      A/R VAT Payable
§         JIN7      A/R CST Payable VAT
○     Service Tax Conditions
§         JSE4    Service Tax
§         JES4    ECS on Service Tax
2.      Set up the following Account Key in the IMG under Financial Accounting ® Financial Accounting Global Settings ® Tax on Sales/Purchases ® Basic Settings ® Check and Change Settings for Tax Processing.
○     VS6    Input Tax
       3.      Define the Tax Procedure according to the settings in the figures below.
You can do this in the IMG under Financial Accounting ® Financial Accounting Global Settings ® Tax on Sales/Purchases ® Basic Settings ® Check Calculation Procedure ® Define Procedures.
4.      Assign Tax Procedure to the country.
You can do this in the IMG under Financial Accounting ® Financial Accounting Global Settings ® Tax on Sales/Purchases ® Basic Settings ® Assign Country to Calculation Procedure.
The standard system comes with two tax calculation procedures. TAXINN is only supports condition-based excise determination, whereas TAXINJ supports condition-based excise determination and formula-based excise determination.
Both tax procedures contain condition types that cover all of the excise duties and sales taxes applicable.
Since the exact rates of excise duty can vary on a large number of factors, such as which vendor you purchase a material from, or which chapter ID the vendor stocks the material under, you create condition records for every sort of excise duty.
When you come to enter a purchasing document, the system applies the excise duty at the rates you have entered in the condition records.
Activities
Customizing
Make the settings in Customizing for Logistics u2013 General, by choosing Taxes on Goods Movements ® India ® Basic Settings ® Excise Duties Using Condition Technique and u2026 ® Account Determination.
These activities include one activity where you define a tax code for condition-based excise determination.
Master Data
Create condition records for all excise duties that apply, and enter the tax code for condition-based excise determination in each.
There are good liiks for both the precedures .Due to new rules i am not in a position to give them.
Regards,

Tax calculation in SRM and passing onto R/3 PO

Hi,
We are on SRM_SERVER 550, SP07 and R/3 4.7 backend.
1. We have a requirement wherein we want the tax determination to happen in SRM. Basically there is no logic for determining the tax codes, but the user himself selects it per line item when creating the cart.
2. We want this to be transferred to the backend PO line item. The tax codes in SRM and R/3 are identical.
Can this be achieved by standard configuration?
I checked that there are 4 choices for tax calculation in SRM
No tax calculation
Tax calculation occurs in backend
Customer specific implementation'
Tax calc occurs via external system
tax calc occurs via TTE
I am not sure which one we should be selecting (currently its no tax calc). I am also not sure if the tax code which is selected in SRM will be passed onto R/3 Or should this be mapped in the BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Badi?
The option thro development is to provide a custom field where users can enter the tax code/choose from a list and then map it to the tax code(TAX_CODE - MWSKZ) field in badi BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW. But we would prefer to stick to the standard options if they are feasible.
Any pointers to this would be very helpful.
Regards,
Srivatsan

Hi,
If you have a classic scenario where the PO is created in the backend only the standard configurations will work for this.
1) Determine System for Tax Calculation--- R/3 Tax calculation occurs in backend.
Tax calculation occurs in the Backend System
Tax calculation occurs via RFC in the backend system in Financial Accounting. If an external system is connected to the backend system (Vertex or Taxware, for example), this is automatically called from the backend system.
2) Enter tax code :
As you mentioned use the same key and also the description here. Make the zero tax as No tax and make it as default also ( which is safer for all users).
With these two config steps you will get an F4 help in the for all the tax codes defined whereas the system will suggest the zero tax as the default.
The other config steps are optional where you can have tax codes for you product category. Please do configurations in these steps only if required.
This SC tax code will be there in the PO created from SRM provided if you have entry for this in FTXP in the R3 system.
As far as we have configured you dont need BADI for this standard Tax calculations.
If the invoice is made in R3 with reference to this PO then this tax code can be changed.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

Tax calculation in backend and in SRM (classic and standalone scenario)

Hello,
I have an issue regarding calculation of tax. 2 scenarios are used in common: classic and standalone. One node of Organizational structure is using classic scenario, another node is using standalone. So I have 2 Accounting Systems defined (one for each node).
Requirement is:
- For classic scenario, setting the tax calculation in backend
- For standalone scenario, setting the tax calculation to no tax calculation
Problem is that I can not customize the system this way. I do not know any mean to set 2 ways for tax calculation. Would you have any idea to do this?
Thanks,
Patrick

Hi
<b>Please go through this -></b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/f4/8b1d40bb37e569e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Note 848164 SUS3.0: FAQ: Logic of Tax calculation within SUS
958273 FAQ: Taxes in SRM-SUS
999896 EBP tax codes not correctly mapped to back-end tax codes.
908659 Follow-up note for Note 509594
931198 Missing Tax Code in Limit Shopping Cart
430202 Delivery address in shopping cart in BAPIEKPOC
931198 Missing Tax Code in Limit Shopping Cart
881086 Country-specific tax calculation
703292 TAX. Input/Output tax in SAP Supplier Self-Services with TTE
513250 ERS. Tax calculation with the new 3.0 function
390861 Transferring tax table for ERS from backend system
Note 657146 Enhancement for US tax calulation: Functions
510142 EDI-Customizing: Tax code tax-exempted transactions
317040 MR08: Message M8267
49436 MR44: No message if the tax amount is different
Note 84127 Tax Jurisdiction Code for EDI/ALE and Intercompany
Also Try BBP_DET_TAX_BADI.
Regards
- Atul

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Service SRM PO fail to replicate to SAP with error"Tax code Mand. for ERS"

HI
We are facing issue for posting Serviice PO with vendor enabled with ERS functionality.
Service purchase orders with ERS flag and with complete tax detail fail to replicate to MM PO. Error found on XML on ECC interface : "Enter Tax code in case of Evaluated receipt settlement".
We have compelete tax details on the XML which is not recognized. When we manually feed the details in dubug it allows to post the document.
PO is created with account assigned service item.
Have any one come across simialr situation.
Regards
Prashanth K Saralaya

Hi Prashanth,
Do you have tax code maintained in SRM PO. SRM PO is pushed to ERP using RFC Calls and not XML(in standard scenarios). I am wondering why XML is being checked in debug mode by you for a SRM PO to make it to ERP.
May I have the background of your requirement..
Regards
Virender Singh

Tax calculation in SRM

Hi
Can the tax calculation be disabled in SRM. How we do it.
Regards
Pooja

Hi
Yes, Tax calculation can be disabled in SRM.
Use transaction SPRO.
IMG->SRM->SRM SERVER->CROSS APPLICATION BASIC SETTINGS-> TAX CALCULATION-> DETERMINE SYST FOR TAX CAL
Here select the radio button for "No tax Calculation" from drop down.
Thanks
Ashish

Tax calculation in SRM from ECC

Hello All
Our requirement is to validate the ship to address entered by an user in SRM shopping cart.
We thought about activating tax calculation in SRM ( by making a call to ECC) , so that the address will be automatically checked & return an error if Tax jurisdiction is not found.
However it turns out that in ECC , the tax jurisdiction is not unique for a given address.
For each address ECC returns two Tax jurisdictions ( One for Out of City & One for in City).
Is there a way to influence ECC and make it always select one of the found Tax jurisdictions.
Is there any other means of checking that the SHip to address is correct ??
Thanks
Kedar

Thanks Ramki !
Our Users should enter the correct combination of City , Zip code, Region and Country when entering
their own ad-hoc addresses in shopping carts.
If Tax calculation is enabled then this is taken care of ,as any wrong combination returns the error " Tax Jurisdiction not found".
However as I mentioned earlier our FICO is set up peculiarly in ECC.
For most Zip code, city and county combinations , there are two tax jurisdictions ( one for in city and one for out of city).
So when SRM calls , ECC can't decide which Tax Jurisdiction to return and hence always returns the error.
I researched on this and no SRM BADI seems relevant. Is there any ECC user exit or any other way??
Thanks
Kedar

Witholding tax calculation with complex formula

Hi Team,
Is there any solution for the below requirement in calculating withholding tax.
System should consider the below formula while calculating Withholding tax for vendor.
If the Invoice (INV) amount is Less than 800 = Tax is 0
801 to 4000 = (INV amount - 800) * 20%
4001 to 20000 = (80% of INV amount) * 20%
20001 to 50000 = (80% of INV amount) * 30%
more than 50001 = (80% of INV amount) * 40%
as per my understanding we can use withholding tax forms. but I am not able to get the above scenario. Can anybody trough the exact step to build the above formula for calculating withholding tax code.
Thanks,
Ravi

Hi,
You create a new WHT Type and Code for this scenario, where in for WHT code defenition, you must select indicator WHT Formula.
Now you can maintain formula for the above created type and code combination with the conditions of your requirement.
IMG -- Financial Accounting (New) -- Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) -- Withholding Tax -- Extended Withholding Tax -- Calculation -- Minimum and Maximum Amounts -- Define Min/Max Amounts for Withholding Tax Codes......Here Maintain the minimum base amount as 800...for the newly created type and code combination.
IMG -- Financial Accounting (New) -- Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) -- Withholding Tax -- Extended Withholding Tax -- Calculation -- Withholding Tax Code -- Define Formulas for Calculating Withholding Tax...............Here you maintain the below entries.
CrcyWHT TypeWHT CodeCountryValid From Date
Then select this new entry and double click on Formulas for withholding tax calculation.
There maintain your conditions.
Regards,
Srinu

Income Tax Calculation problem: Urgent Help Needed

Dear Gurus,
I am facing a unique problem. Our client has two incentives
1) Product Incentive
2) Sales Incentive
Every month incentive figures get changed. These two are Monthly Regular Income (Cumulations Class 24) i.e. included in annual tax calculation.
Now for tax calculation, my client wants "Actual Earning" and "Estimated Earning for the rest of the year" to be different. But Income tax calculation in SAP (for the month of April 2007) takes Actual Earning and multiplied it by 12( i.e. 11+1) to calculate Estimated Earning. But my client wants this Estimated Earning to be different.
Now please let me know is this possible in SAP system and how to calculate this?
Your help will be highly appreciated
Waiting for an early reply.
Thanking You,
With Best Regards,
Pratik

Hi,
I am not understand your problem give your mb then i talk to you
mhpo

Income Tax Calculations 2008

Hi Friends,
I have a Issue in Income Tax calculation,
for the month of September, the form 16 for a particular employee is a follows
Form 16 summary
Gross Salary                   783,399.00
Exemption U/S 10                 5,600.00
Balance                        777,799.00
Empmnt tax (Prof Tax)            1,125.00
Aggrg Deduction                  1,125.00
Incm under Hd Salary           776,674.00
Gross Tot Income               725,513.00
Agg of Chapter VI              106,008.00
Total Income                   619,510.00
Tax on total Income             90,853.00
Tax payable and surcharg        93,579.00
Tax deducted so far             24,100.00
Income Tax                       9,926.00
Now i have added a wage Type called Special pay -Rs.100000 in IT 15, eventhough this amount is reflecting in monthly gross salary and RT table, this amount is not considered for Income tax . I.e with or without Wage type Special pay, The gross salary considred for Income Tax is 783399(without any change). Why it is so.
Rgds,
Sekar.

Hi Sekar,
Make sure that you have assigned the right processing and cumulation classes to your wage type in table V_512W_D
Make sure that in table V_512W_D cumulation class 1 is ticked for this wagetype.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

How to create dynamic Invoice report based on Tax calculations

Hi Ppl,
I have an invoice report requirement. There are multiple line items in invoice and each line item will have a tax % and discount associated with it. Discount has to be applied at line item level. Tax will be applicable on resultant amount which respect to tax share on total amount. Below is example
Part# Tax     Qty     UnitPrice Amount     Discount     Net Value
1     12.5%     40     10          400          100          300
2     12.5%     50     20          1000          200          800
3     4%     10     30          300          50          250
                         SubTotal                    1350
                         VAT 12.5% on 1100(300+800)     137.50
                         VAT 4% on 250               10
                         Total Amount               1497.5
I have created a static rtf which does all calculations correctly. I have hardcoded 12.5 and 4 % tax values for calculations. But issue is that taxes are changeable in future so I want to create dynamic template which takes care for tax calculations. I thought of to create an array to store distinct tax values from XML data and then to perform calculation but don’t know how to do that.
Can some body help me out as this is very critical and urgent?
Note: Tax calculation can be done at line item level itself but there are some scenarios where additional discounts are there so tax calculation can not be done at line item level.
Below is the sample XML data
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ListOfBipActionTest>
- <Action>
<AccountId>1</AccountId>
<PartName>17211KCC900LS</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>40</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>47.06</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>2</AccountId>
<PartName>17213KCC900LS</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>50</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>19.53</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>8.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>3</AccountId>
<PartName>28302KAG900S</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>50</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>59.49</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>4</AccountId>
<PartName>2830AKAG900S</PartName>
<TAX>12.5</TAX>
<QTY>10</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>168.7</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>15.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
- <Action>
<AccountId>4</AccountId>
<PartName>91001GF6000S</PartName>
<TAX>4.00</TAX>
<QTY>60</QTY>
<UNITPRICE>115.34</UNITPRICE>
<DIS>17.00</DIS>
<TaxType>CST</TaxType>
</Action>
</ListOfBipActionTest>
Thanks
Ashish

Dear Efstratios Kara,
I installed SAP Integration Kit 3.1. Yes I installed the integration kit after installing CR.
I have uninstalled the earlier version and i have reinstalled CR with (12.3.0.601) version.
But still i cant view the SAP connectivity. can u tell me from which version they have included this connectivity option in CR.
If CR going to support SAP Table connectivity on specific version, what is that version.
Waiting for your reply.
Regards,
Suman

Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.

Excise Settings completed.                    02.11.2007
a)     Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
b)     Maintained J1ID, all steps.
c)     Maintained tax code in FTXP.
d)     FV11  Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
e)     Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
f)     Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
g)     Maintained all number Ranges.
Issue  1)
Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
a)     JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
b)     JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
Fi pricing procedure.
PO Taxes  wrong Tax calculated
FV11 Condition record
Issue  2)
While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty & sales tax.
Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
Please suggest.
Manish Gupta
93295 53235
[email protected]

Hai,
1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected]

BIW with SRM&TAX calculation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for