Oracle AP: With Holding Tax Calculated wrongly

Dear Pros...
Pls help with regards to the following...
We want Oracle to APPLY  Witholding tax at Payment time and create withholding invoice at payment time
Following is our setup:
In Payable Options window: Witholding Tax Tab
Use Witholding Tax = Check
Allow Manual Witholding = Check
Witholding amount basis:
Include Tax amount = Check
Apply Witholding Tax:
At Payment Time = Check
Create Witholding Invoice :
At Payment Time = Check
Total Invoice Amount to be processed = 100
Our desired result should be the following double entry
@ Invoice entry time
DR  Expense  100
Cr     Liability                100
@ payment time…..we want system to do the following entry
DR   Liability     100
CR     CASH            95
CR WITHOLDING TAX    5
BUT
INSTEAD OF DOING ABOVE DOUBL ENTRY…….
ORACLE IS DOING FOLLOWING DOUBLE ENTRY
@ Invoice entry level (same as desired)
DR  Expense  100
Cr     Liability                100
@ Invoice Payment level (Oracle is deducting extra tax and debiting liability with 105) which we don’t want
Dr  Liability   105
CR   Cash                           100
CR  Witholding Tax                  5
PLS Help....!

Hi,
In your initial post you mention this option in Payables Options:
Total Invoice Amount to be processed = 100
Where do you find this option?
Octavio

Similar Messages

  • Calculation of with holding tax

    The requirement goes like this.
    We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
    And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
    Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
    Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
    I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
    Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
    Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

    Hi,
    i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
    MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
    Best regards.

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

    Dear team,
    While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Dear Sir,
    What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after  given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • Regarding With holding tax with CIN version

    Hello SAP gurus
    I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
    How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
    While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
    So what does configuration required for above error.
    I will assign full points
    Regards
    Divya

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • With holding tax

    Hi,
    If  i  select With holding  tab  when   entering Down payment request,Down payment and invoice for vendor,  i  am getting error message as  Withholding Tax information missing from line item
    Could you advise me where i made wrong cogfiguration for with holding tax.
    Your immediate response will be highly appreciated.
    With regards,
    V.K

    Hi
    Check Feild status group of G067 in OB14 and make sure that these are optional and also the Feild status group of WHT GL accounts you have assigned.
    There is always a possibility that these are in suppressed state.
    Award points if useful.
    sarma

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Query Regarding With holding tax deducted

    Hi,
    Hi,
    I am facing one problem with With Holding Tax deduction.
    Let us explaining with example: 
    1)  Ist I passed one entry through T.Code: f-48 then deducted some TDS (Rs. 5000/- down payment).
    2) IInd I passed one invoice T.Code:  f-43 then deducted TDS (Invoice amount Rs. 10000/- but tds base amount entered Rs. 5000/-).
    Here above I passed two entries and deducted total amount of TDS. 
    3) While at the time of balance amount payment T.Code:  F-53 again system will deduct TDS. 
    I am facing problem here. Why system is again deduct TDS at the time of balance payment.  Already balance amount of TDS duducted at time of Invoice.
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Srinivas Gundala

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • Re: With Holding tax

    Hi all,
          I have an issue relating to with holding tax. wtax code is not picking the percentage ammount while doing the transaction.Please provide the solution.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    What r u doing Invoicing or Advance payment. Pls chk in Config whether u have maintained percentage for that particular Tax code
    SPRO
    Financial Accounting  --> Financial Accounting Global Settings -->
    Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Calculation --> Withholding Tax Code --> Define Withholding Tax Codes
    And chk in Vendor Master also whether they have maintained any Exemption code or percentage.
    If this information is useful. Pls assign Points

  • Optional With holding tax for a vendor

    Dear All,
    I want to make the with holding tax optional during MIRO.
    I have already assign the tax code in vendor master and so it automatically deduct withholding tax.
    But my vendor is a supplier as well as a broker for me. So when i want to pay him Brokerage I want automatic tax deduction which is happening but when i want to pay him for the material which he supplied to me also the tax get automatically deducted.
    Can any body help me on this?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rakesh

    Hi Milind
    Appreciate your prompt response, I am looking for information on what needs to be done for implementing with holding tax for Puerto Rico, May be I was wrong when I said I could not find any links on this subject either in SAP Help or else where. What I could not find was Information specific to Puerto Rico withholding tax. We normally have lots of information on WithHolding tax in SAP help and else where on the net.
    I am looking for information specific to WithHolding tax for Puerto Rico.
    Regards
    KIM Khan

  • How to calculate with holding tax for the open item

    Dera all,
    Can you tel me how to simulate with holding tax for the open item? i will try do it using FI_WT_F110_CALCULATE FM  but it dosnt work. plz help me
    regard
    nawa

    Hi Sushil,
    can you please elaborate on how you resolved it. we are facing the same issue with BAPI not calculating the withholding tax data.
    Thanks,
    Sanket

  • DOUBT IN CIN (WITH HOLDING TAX TDS)

    Payment occured first and Invoice occured afterwards. Now my question how to configure the system for calculation of with holding tax amount.

    Hi Prasana,
    In the TDS configuration, Define Withholding Tax Types You have to put a tick in the "Per Year, Starting with Month" accumulation type & enter the starting month.
    Next in the define witholding tax code you have to put a tick in the box "wtax form" in the calculation Tab.
    Next in the define formulas for calculating withholding tax you have to enter the formulas for calculating tax as follows:
    To base Amount, Witholding Tax Rate etc. can be maintained.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    AVD.

  • With-holding tax not updates

    Hi,
    While doing MIRO the with-holding tax tab is not getting updated. but when I view the accounting document the TDS is getting posted to the correct G/L and the amount is correct.  I have maintained in Vendor master the with-holding tax.
    Please suggest where to configure this.
    Regrds,
    Raziq

    Dear MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI,
    What you meant to say is while doing MIRO, in with-holding tax tab both with-hold type and code will be updated other fields will not be updated.
    for Example...
    1. If invoice amount is 10000 and if I want to tax for only 5000 then i can manually enter the base amount in the field and the system will calculate the percentage from the based amount only is it.
    2. if the invoice amount is 10000 and if i want to tax for the whole amount then the system will only enter the with-hold type and code, the base amount will not be take by the system but when posting the document the system calculates based on the invoice.
    i am right or wrong.. please reply
    regards,
    Raziq.

  • Populating with holding tax part in WITH_ITEM using RFBIBL00

    Hi all,
          While handling with hold tax part during FB01 UPLOAD using RFBIBL00- DIRECT INPUT METHOD,i assigned WITHT, WT_WITHCD AND WT_QSSHB values to BWITH,and the tax part gets calculated and updating bseg table, but the tax part is not getting updated in WITH_ITEM  TABLE,
    can any help me out in this regard, its on high priority.
    Regards
    suresh

    From the documentation of RFBIBL00:
    Extended withholding tax functions:
    Only transactions FB01 and FBV1 are supported for the extended withholding tax functions. Direct input is not supported.
    The withholding tax data for BWITH must be transferred for every customer/vendor line item. The withholding tax data must come after the BBSEG data. A BWITH structure must be transferred for each withholding tax type.
    Rob

Maybe you are looking for