BizTalk EDI ST/SE Batching

Is there a setting so ST segments (ST02/SE) gets reset each time to start from 001 and increment by one within a file.
Current
output from EDISend Pipeline:
ISA*********
GS**********
ST*837*0001*005010~
Claim1
SE*56*0001~
ST*837*0001*005010~
Claim2
SE*56*0001~
ST*837*0001*005010~
Claim3
SE*56*0001~
Required output
from EDISend Pipeline:
ISA*********
GS**********
ST*837*0001*005010~
Claim1
SE*56*0001~
ST*837*0002*005010~
Claim2
SE*56*0002~
ST*837*0003*005010~
Claim3
SE*56*0003~
I went into Party setup, under Local Host settings checked Transaction setControl Numbers (ST02), but each
time I am dropping a file - ST02 is starting from random number sequence ?
I need to have ST/SE from 0001 ...0002...0003
Any advise please how to do this ?
MBH

My Scenario is :
1) I have a Flatfile coming in, FF Disassembler is dissasembling and a Map is given at Send Port which is Mapped from FF to 835. (In this Map ST01 is set to 835 and ST02 is set to 0001)
2)Then in another send port we are setting up filters and in Party setup we use Batching Configuration and giving EDI.BatchName in filters but definitely to batch this is using EDI.BatchingOrchestration
MBH

Similar Messages

EDI invoice for Batch qty.

Dear experts,
in a special scenario I would like that in the EDI outbound invoice Batch qty. which is not showing for segment E1EDP19 which is showing only the Batch nr., I wanted to use a BADI for EDI outbound invoice which uses the logic for transfering Batch qts. in the IDOC?
Does anynone know BADIs or any userexits for such scenario?
Thanks and advice.

Hi Ram,
thanks. Do we have a sepeicifc BADI also??
When IDOC is passed to the externnal system one uses BAPIs, what about before the IDOC is passed, I want the IDOC
content(BATCH QTY.), in the SAP itself, to have the Batch qty. passed in the IDOC.
The standard SAP shows only Batch nr. and not the BAtch qty.
Thanks and advice.

BizTalk EDI pipeline not failing due to NTE^02 exceeding 80 characters

Hi,
I have a case where special characters are used in the free form description that is placed in an NTE^02 segment in an outbound EDI document. The maximum length allowed for NTE^02 is 80 characters. But if a special character (Europe) is in the text,
it is supposed to be counted as 2 characters not 1. This is not being caught by the BizTalk EDI pipeline and file is failing EDI validation on the partners side due to this.
Any ideas if this is a bug or I am not setting a configuration?
Thanks!

Then you need to check their Companion Guide, or ask them, exactly what character set they're expecting.
If they say
"SóME TEXT" is 10 characters, then they are likely expecting Basic, or maybe Extended which is single
byte encoding (it's just ASCII), but you are sending UTF8. "ó" is a valid Extended single byte character but in UTF8 would be double-byte.
X12 supports UTF8 so double-byte characters are allowed, provided both sides agree.
Whatever the correct value, the better place to set it would be in the Agreement.
Thanks. I'll it out.
The partner is using UTF-8 which is what i am setting (and default). So does that mean "ó" is correctly being seen by the partner as occupying 2 characters lengths?

BizTalk EDI Diassembler Pipeline Issue.

Hi All,
I am using BizTalk EDI Pipeline to diassemble an input EDIFACT D93A message. The message has IMD(Item Description) segment with a space between (: and Cream bar)like below and it is failing in the validation.
IMD+F++::: Cream Bar soap 4-pk'
QTY+12:15.000'
I dont have any party configured so as per my understanding, it will use the EDI Fallback properties where i set Validation property of "Leading and trailing spaces and zeros policy" to Allowed, but still it is getting failed.
Kindly help ?
Thanks,
Varun
Thanks, Varun

There seems to be other people experiencing problems with this features in 2013 / 2013 R2.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c146a7e7-ebe6-4b43-8139-ac9d96f4a92d/biztalk-2013-failed-to-allow-leading-and-trailing-sapce-and-zero-on-party-agreement?forum=biztalkediandas2
Morten la Cour

BizTalk EDI Transaction Volume

Looking for a distribution or retail organization that uses BizTalk for EDI and processes in excess of 90,000 EDI documents daily. We are reviewing BizTalk as a potential solution for EDI and need to know if it is capable of handling this type of volume.
Thanks,
Anthony Ashford

Just as an FYI, it is your other systems, not BizTalk, that will most likely have the performance problems - like your ERP. A BizTalk environment is considered fast if it's doing 1000 messages per second. That's 3.6 million per hour. I have personally worked
on more than one of those. My laptop can do more than 90K per hour - EDI 850s too (then again it is a i7 with 16 GB and SSD - and this is dumping them to file, not some SAP system or anything).
I regularly work with a BizTalk implementation that is more complex than EDI and it does far above 120K per day without breaking a sweat.
Now EDI particulars - are you doing outbound EDI batching? This may slow you down, but 90K should still be OK. Also, how are you getting this data in and out of BizTalk from your other system? Will this be database direct? Web services?
Also is this a packaged solution, like Dynamics, or custom software that will be producing and consuming (original creator / final recipient) of said EDI?
Kind Regards,
-Dan
If this answers your question, please Mark as Answer

Biztalk EDI 856 Mapping H1 Segment

Hi,
I'm new to EDI 856 mapping in Biztalk. I have to map xml schema to EDI 856 XSD and generate a EDI file through biztalk.
I've 3 datasets (repeating nodes) in internal schema (shipment level, order level and item level) I have to map this data to EDI 856 in Biztalk mapping. But the complexity is i have to map all the data's with-in HL loop. I have to repeat HL loop thrice
for shipment level , order level , and item level and each time i should map data to different segments. (ex: i should have LIN segment only at item level).
My output should be like
<HL> --SHIPMENT LEVEL
<TD1></TD1>
<TD3></TD3>
<REF></REF>
<FOB></FOB>
<HL> -- ORDER LEVEL
<TD1></TD1>
<REF></REF>
<N1></N1>
<HL> --ITEM LEVEL
<LIN></LIN>
<SN1></SN1>
<TD></TD>
The problem i face is since i loop HL segment the N1 which should be present only at order level gets repeated at shipment and item level too. Please help me or suggest any study material , its urgent.
Thanks in advance..

Hi,
I can anyone help me to map a flat XSD to a structured XSD in biztalk mapping.
Incoming Schema
Record
<Shipmentdata>
<Shipmentdata1>
<Shipmentdata2>
<Orderdata>
<Orderdata1>
<Orderdata2>
<ItemData>
<ItemData1>
<ItemData2>
OutputSchema
<shipmentData>
<OrderData>
<ItemData>
My input schema is a flat one which i take from DB (ex: if there is 15 items in one shipment and 3 orders the xml will repeat 15 times with repeating data in shipment node and order node). I should convert it into a Structured XML with 3 level of hierarchy.
Please help with Biztalk mapper example. Thanks in advance.

Biztalk EDI error

I received this error:
Error: 1 (Miscellaneous error)
16: Invalid Control Standard Identifier
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ISA
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: ISA11
Position in Segment: 11
Data Value: ^
7: Invalid code value.
The sequence number of the suspended message is 1.
I believe it is pointing to this value ^ but my whole edi file has this character ^. I know the fact that it is supposed to be changed to the value capital U
But I would still want to process this file to my SQL server with the value ^. How can I achieve that? any receive pipeline settings that needs to be edited?
Christiane

Maheshkumar,
I created a receive pipeline and used the EDI disassembler and I checked this property to TRUE, (USEISA11ASREPETIONSEPARATOR) and that fixes this particular issue but then Biztalk displayed 3 errors in the application log.
Error: 1 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ST
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: CIMCode
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
1: Mandatory data element missing
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: PER
Position in TS: 1580
Data Element ID: PER04_CommunicationNumber
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
6: Leading or trailing space found
Error: 3 (Field level error)
SegmentID: PER
Position in TS: 5210
Data Element ID: PER04_CommunicationNumber
Position in Segment: 4
Data Value:
6: Leading or tra
Christiane

Biztalk EDi schema Validation

Hi Experts,
Currently we are validating the EDI IFSCUM schemas at the pipeline level, now I have a requirement in such a way that the message should come to Orchestration and in Orchestration i will validate the incoming message against schema validation method.
I tried to keep the edivalidation set to false and dropped the message with wrong record count in UNT record.
But this message is failing at port level, i need to pass this message to orchestration.
How can i bypass these kind of validations at port level?

Hi Sandy,
Some of the EDI validations are performed always irrespective whether the EDI validation is enabled or not.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb226369.aspx
Refer the msdn article above. This specifies the validation that are performed always and validation which are done only if the EDI Data validation is enabled.
Regards, Vivin.

Biztalk EDI ISA12 Invalid

HI Experts,
Am getting below error,
Error: 1 (Miscellaneous error)
17: Invalid VersionId
Error: 2 (Field level error)
SegmentID: ISA
Position in TS: 1
Data Element ID: ISA12
Position in Segment: 12
Data Value: 004010
7: Invalid code value
As my partner is sending that value, I thought of editing service extension schema also, but i can't found that.
Without using custom pipeline can any suggest where we can add custom values to ISA12, so that it will reflect in Party configuration in Biztalk 2013

Hi Sandy,
I see now that Customizing Enumeration won't help as you can't add Enumerations ISA12, only below fields can be modified:
ISA01 – Authorization Qualifier
ISA03 – Security Qualifier
ISA05 – Sender ID Qualifier
ISA07 - Receiver ID Qualifier
GS01 - Functional Code
GS07 - Responsible Agency
So this option is ruled out.
I would ask you to
apply hot fix on your dev env and test (Ideally it should resolve the issue) . But ff applying hot fix does not help then you should contact
Microsoft Support
reporting this bug.
Maheshkumar
S Tiwari|User
Page|Blog|BizTalk
Server : Fetching UNB and UNG Segment Values From Interchange Envelope and Mapping

BizTalk edi parties

Hi biztalk Exports,
how we differentiate ack to destination parties,
i am filtering the ack with message type and all ack are same message type default .
how we send ack to exact partie..!
Any one can help me.!
Thanks.

in trading partner set up you can configure ack .
while creating message you can also set up party.
Regards
Mohit Gupta

Xpath to pull data from EDI Batch Message

Hi,
Can anyone help me to pass xpath code to pull DocType (MessageType) or ST01 from BizTalk EDI Batch message inside the orchestration?
I'm routing all batched messages from a custom batch router odx and will have to handle by message type.
New to xpath and any help will be greatly appreciated.
S

I think, if I can grab the attribute DocType from <Functionalgroup DocType = "MessageType'>, that would resolve my issue. Pasting part of the Batched Message.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<X12InterchangeXml DelimiterSetSerializedData="124:13:10:42:126:-1:-1:-1:-1">
-<ns0:ISA xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema">
<ISA01>*</ISA01>
<ISA02>*</ISA02>
<ISA03>*</ISA03>
<ISA04>*</ISA04>
<ISA05>01</ISA05>
<ISA06>XXXXXXXXX </ISA06>
<ISA07>ZZ</ISA07>
<ISA08>YYYYYYYYY </ISA08>
<ISA09>*</ISA09>
<ISA10>*</ISA10>
<ISA11>U</ISA11>
<ISA12>00401</ISA12>
<ISA13>*</ISA13>
<ISA14>0</ISA14>
<ISA15>T</ISA15>
<ISA16>~</ISA16>
</ns0:ISA>
-<FunctionalGroup DocType="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/X12/2006#X12_00401_810">
-<ns0:GS xmlns:ns0="http://schemas.microsoft.com/Edi/X12ServiceSchema">
<GS01>IN</GS01>
<GS02>XXXXXXXXX</GS02>
<GS03>YYYYYYY</GS03>
<GS04>*</GS04>

EDI x12 Batching Just through Map

Hi - I have a FlatFile message coming in, which is mapped to EDI x12 837 schema (containg ST/SE).
When I test the Map which input file , only first ST/SE is created and all other records are skipped. Is there any property in the schema that I need to change so that while I do Test Map, all records appear instead of just one ?
MBH

That's actually how the EDI schemas work because that's how EDI transactions are structured with ST/SE at the top level. Only in an Functional Group, GS/GE, can you have multiple ST/SE's. Interchange batching ISA/GS/GE/IEA are handled by the
Batching Orchestration.
A HIPAA 837 contains multiple claims because of the looping at the 2000A thru 2300 levels.
If you have an input with multiple claims, you have three choices:
Link your map to loop at 2000A (or 2300 if 2000A/B are the exact same for each Claim). This will give you one message, ST/SE, with multiple claims.
Debatch your incoming file into individual claims, map/process/etc, then use BizTalk EDI Batching to assemble the out going Interchange.
Map Directly to the Interchange Schema. For this to work, it requires some hand coding in places.
Couple of notes from experience:
#2 is the my preferred way even though it creates individual ST/SE's for each claim. Some gripe that defeats the purpose of the looping in the 837 but it's actually more in line with EDI and business transactions in general. However some receivers
can't accept this for legacy software reasons.
If you have to make a single ST/SE with multiple claims, it's much easier to just loop at 2000A for every claim in the incoming batch, even if there is duplicate data in 2000A's. The 1k you might save in the EDI is not worth the effort, programming
or CPU, to resequence by Billing Provider.

BizTalk Server 2010 - Batching Issue

Hi - I have setup and configured a Party and under Batching configuration setup the Party Name, Filter as ReceivePortName and Message Type and setup schedule for testing for every 5 mins. When I am dropping the message receiving following errors :
xlang/s engine event log entry: Uncaught exception (see the 'inner exception' below) has suspended an instance of service 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.RoutingOrchestration.BatchRoutingService(49b4780c-52fe-7b25-8e71-23f6d6ba8962)'.
The service instance will remain suspended until administratively resumed or terminated.
If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception.
InstanceId: bc7e6a70-9f6c-413f-9746-18266fba7b63
Shape name:
ShapeId: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
Exception thrown from: segment 1, progress 0
Inner exception: Exception occurred when persisting state to the database.
Exception type: PersistenceException
Source: Microsoft.XLANGs.BizTalk.Engine
Target Site: Void Commit()
The following is a stack trace that identifies the location where the exception occured
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXXlangStore.Commit()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXXlangStore.ScheduleComplete(Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.XLANGs.BTXEngine.BTXService.ScheduleComplete(Context ctx, Boolean finalPersisting, Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.Service.Persist(Boolean dehydrate, Context ctx, Boolean idleRequired, Boolean finalPersist, Boolean bypassCommit, Boolean terminate)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.TransactionalContext.OnCommit()
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.AtomicTransaction.OnCommit()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.RoutingOrchestration.BatchRoutingService.segment1(StopConditions stopOn)
at Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.SegmentScheduler.RunASegment(Segment s, StopConditions stopCond, Exception& exp)
Additional error information:
A batch item failed persistence Item-ID 69062828-e34d-42c6-8c38-bd43bee7c619 OperationType MAIO_CommitBatch Status -1061151998 ErrorInfo The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. .
Exception type: PersistenceItemException
Additional error information:
A batch item failed persistence Item-ID bc7e6a70-9f6c-413f-9746-18266fba7b63 OperationType MAIO_InstanceComplete Status 12589892 ErrorInfo .
Exception type: PersistenceItemException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
Additional error information:
Failed to publish (send) a message in the batch. This is usually because there is no one expecting to receive this message. The error was The published message could not be routed because no subscribers were found. with
status -1061151998.
Exception type: PublishMessageException
MBH

This error can occur when the RoutingOrchestration attempts to send a message to the BatchingOrchestration and the BatchingOrchestration instance is not started.
Ensure that the BatchingOrchestration instances are running before submitting documents to be batched.
Known Issues with EDI Batching
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful.

ST02 value and EDI Batching

Hi,
I'm hard coding ST02 value as 0001 in map as it is a required field. When I send multiple X12 820s to the Batching Orchestration, it fails it is finding a duplicate control number. Is there a way I can access the running ST02 from functoid or from ODX and
assign it to ST02? This value is getting replaced in send pipeline from Party Configuration and I'm fine with it. All I'm trying to achieve is that the batching of 820s without failure.
One option is to maintain these counters in a SQL table and get them in the map but I assume there will be something in the BizTalk to get this counter. I'm using BizTalk Server 2013.
Thanks
Reddy

Here is the error message:
Uncaught exception (see the 'inner exception' below) has suspended an instance of service 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.BatchSuspendOrchestration.BatchElementSuspendService(52b477a6-f224-d7ee-a40d-92c8ad5f5544)'.
The service instance will remain suspended until administratively resumed or terminated.
If resumed the instance will continue from its last persisted state and may re-throw the same unexpected exception.
InstanceId: 431d7e77-8927-4179-92e7-8ba2d76e0590
Shape name: Throw that an error has occured
ShapeId: 209c5624-f52a-404d-b44d-d8fb41b0fed4
Exception thrown from: segment 2, progress 33
Inner exception: The batch element is being suspended as it either failed schema validation or context properties are not matching batch definition. The error is : Stopping after the first error !!
Duplicate transaction set control number. The transaction set control number should be unique per functional group.Please use the EDI Design Time tools to get a complete list of errors.
Exception type: Applicat

BizTalk Server 2013 R2 EDI EDIFACT custom Target Namespace is not being used

I have a client that has a partner that doesn't use the "out of the box" BizTalk EDIFACT 97A DELFOR schema. I'm using BizTalk Server 2013 R2. I need to use a custom target namespace. I have created a custom schema for EFACT_D97A_DELFOR with
a different namespace http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/EDIFACT/2006_<partnername>.
In the Parties agreement/Transaction Set Settings/Local Host Settings, I have the following in a separate row under the "Default", UNH2.1=DELFOR, UNH2.2=D, UNH2.3=97A and TargetNamespace=http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/EDIFACT/2006_<partnername>
It wants to use the out of the box schema from the error below but I need it to use the custom schema. If I change the input file with a UH2.5 value along with changing the root node to match it EFACT_D97A_DELFOR_<UNH2.5), it works but the partner
will not be sending this, so it's not an option.
Error details: An output message of the component "Unknown " in receive pipeline "Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.DefaultPipelines.EdiReceive, Microsoft.BizTalk.Edi.EdiPipelines, Version=3.0.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35"
is suspended due to the following error:
Error encountered during parsing. The Edifact transaction set with id '' contained in interchange (without group) with id '000010080', with sender id '<senderid>', receiver id '<receiverid>' is being suspended with following
errors:
Error: 1 (Miscellaneous error)
70: Finding the document specification by message type "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/EDIFACT/2006#EFACT_D97A_DELFOR" failed. Verify the schema deployed properly.
Error: 2 (Miscellaneous error)
71: Transaction Set or Group Control Number Mismatch
Error: 3 (Miscellaneous error)
29: Invalid count specified at interchange, group or message level
Any thoughts for this issue?
Thanks,
Sean

All,
Because the trading partner is not sending the UNH2.5, UNG2.1 and UNG2.2 values in the incoming message, the EDIFACT custom targetnamespace schema will not be used. I created a decode custom pipeline component where I inject the UNH2.5 element,changed
the rootnode to the trading partner specific schema to EFACT_D97A_DELFOR_XYZ (where "XYZ" is the value in the UNH2.5) and in the Party agreement->TransactionSetSettings->LocalHostSettings default row specifying the UNH2.1, UNH2.2
and UNH2.5, it will then use the custom schema(http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/EDI/EDIFACT/2006#EFACT_D97A_DELFOR_XYZ. I could've injected the UNG segment
and used a custom target namespace and not changed the rootnode of the custom schema but didn't want to add all that extra segment information.
The example below assumes that the UNH segment only has values "up to" UNH2.4 only and appends the UNH2.5. Uses the UNA segement to dynamically set the componentDataElementSeparator.
//UNA segment e.g. UNA:+.? '
//this example above has ' as the segmentTerminator, : as the componentDataElementSeparator, + as the dataElementSeparator
string unaSegment = messageBody.Substring(0, messageBody.ToUpper().IndexOf("UNA") + 9);
string componentDataElementSeparator = unaSegment.Substring(3, 1);
string dataElementSeparator = unaSegment.Substring(4, 1);
string segmentTerminator = unaSegment.Substring(8, 1);
string UNH_Segment = messageBody.Substring(messageBody.ToUpper().IndexOf("UNH"));
UNH_Segment = UNH_Segment.Substring(0, UNH_Segment.IndexOf(segmentTerminator));
//inject UNH2_5 in the existing UNH_Segment
messageBody = messageBody.Replace(UNH_Segment,
UNH_Segment + componentDataElementSeparator + UNH2_5);
Thanks All for all your help!!
Sean Boman

BizTalk EDI ST/SE Batching

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for