Biztalk functoid issue

HI Experts,
I need to check a condition in map if (sourceSchema.node2=="datathere")
then I need to map the (sourceSchema.node3 to desinationSchema.Out3).
I have done this using scripting functoid(where condition is checked and returns Bool) mapped to value mapping.
Every thing is fine, when it is false, output attribute value is coming as empty.
Here I should avoid to display the empty attribute.How can i skip that in the output?
Here My output is attribute.Do any one has any ideas on this?

HI All,
My input is an xml schema and output is flat file attributes .csv.
Incase if the expected value is not there in the source , i need to avoid the empty record with comma separated like below..
If matches
'junkvalue','MatchedValue', ' ' ,
But i want my output like this
Doesn't Match
'junkvalue', '
here you see, when it is true, i got 3 CSV values, id it doesn't match i need to remove that empty value
Thanks,
Sandy

Similar Messages

BizTalk AS2 Issue

Hi,
We have setup BizTalk AS2 and we are receiving the following error for the specific send port (on outbound):
The adapter failed to transmit message going to send port “” with URL “”.
It will be retransmitted after the retry interval specified for this Send Port. Details:"Unable to read data from the transport connection: The connection was closed.".
Note we are sending to the same URL for another sendport (and its working fine), but we are changing the AS2 ids (as one is for a canada and another is for US). Any direction would
be great. Thanks in advance.
System information:
Windows Server 2008 R2
BizTalk Server 2010
Thanks,
Jacob

Hi Jacob,
I understand that the same URL is working, but how about the party configuration and its association with the send port? Have you changed/updated the party when you change the URL? Check it.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Deployment Framework for BizTalk (BTDF) Issue

Hi ,
I am getting file not found and other issue,while deploying application using BTDF,for more details please see the attached screen shot.
Note: I am able to build the same application without BTDF .
any help...

just cross check in your orcehstration project properties and check what is the assembly name you mentioned.
Your BTDF settings in build server is expecting for the dll with name
"ProjectName.Orchestrations.dll" , that is in your case BTDF_Deploy.Orchestrations.dll
so your orchestration's project assembly name should be same like
BTDF_Deploy.Orchestrations so that the generated dll will be with name
BTDF_Deploy.Orchestrations.dll
if this does not solve it, then we need to verify settings in BTDF proj file for your project and if required in build server configuration too.
Please mark the post as answer if this answers your question. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

SAP biztalk Integration issue

Hi Gurus,
I have designed an RFC for indent order flow in ECC 6, which is intergrated with MS Biztalk server 2009. The problem is that I my output in standlone system is fine and perfect. But if I run the same interface thru Biztalk ,there is some mismatch between values. To be precise status values(text). For example if the status is Fully Delivered for an Indent, Biztalk is consuming as Not Delivered. other values are perfect.
Kindly give the solution at the earliest.
Thanks in Advance,
Ram.

Rams wrote:
> For example if the status is Fully Delivered for an Indent, Biztalk is consuming as Not Delivered. other values are perfect.
> Ram.
I feel some values in the RFC of the previous call not cleared. make sure all variables are cleared every time call comes in
a®

Biztalk MQSeries issue with whitespace characters

We have a Biztalk 2010 implementation that is putting messages onto a MQSeries (v 7.1) Queue. Sometimes the messages have a "/r" or "/n" embedded in an xml element typed as xsi:string. When the message is put onto the
MQSeries Queue the "/r" or "/n" have been removed. Assuming this has something to do with white space removal but can see no setting to stop it. Also, the /r, /n are in elements typed as xsi:string which is supposed to preserve
white space by default. Any assistance on this would be appreciated.
phil

We plan to try that although we do have another send port filtering on the receive port in the same way and the characters are preserved in a file drop, Further, we tried changing the send port to passthru (no XML processing) and it still removed the /r
when peeked in the MQSeries QUEUE (the peek was hex and the chars are truly gone)
phil

Biztalk 2006 issue

Hello:
We have change the DNS setting of our Standby SQL Server to production.
I see connection coming from BIZTALK server into SQL Server and all required BizTalk Services are running fine.
I am getting following error as shown below when I try to change or refresh from BizTalk Admin Console
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Jay
Error:-
TITLE: BizTalk Server 2006 Administration Console
The Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MSDTC) may not be configured correctly.
Ensure that the MSDTC service is running and DTC network access is allowed on the BizTalk, SQL and SSO Master servers. For more information, see "MSDTC Configuration settings required for BizTalk Server" in the BizTalk Server Help.
Internal Error The transaction has already been implicitly or explicitly committed or aborted (Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM)
For help, click:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=47400&ProdName=Microsoft+BizTalk+Server+2006+R2&ProdVer=3.6.1404.0&EvtSrc=Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.Resources&EvtID=IDS_ERR_DTC_MISCONFIGURED
BUTTONS:
OK

Hi Aaditya,
Have you
enabled MSDTC on the BizTalk Server
Maheshkumar S Tiwari|User
Page | http://tech-findings.blogspot.com/

PI and Biztalk webservice issues

I am getting following error in message monetoring, when I am trying to call web service deployed on biztalk server:
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: java.io.IOException: invalid content type for SOAP: TEXT/HTML
I am confident that all the configuration are correct, do I need to do some extra configuration in case of biztalk server.
regards,
Jawed Ali

Hi,
Please have look into below link..here you will get various possible causes and solution for it.
DeliveryException:: invalid content type for SOAP: TEXT/HTML
Thanks
Swarup

Biztalk transaction issue.

Hi,
when i am selecting the transaction type property(automic) at scope level the below error i am getting what is the cause for this???
Error:A Non-transactional Orchestration cannot contain any other Transactions

You need to set the orchestration transaction property to long running before you can create transactional scopes within it. Morten la cour

Biztalk edifact Issues

FTX04:01 in datatype is AN(simple Type).
Currently am validating the input message instace with schema.
When I am doing it am allowing ALLOW TRAILING set to True and rest of all is correct.
but here my doubt is when the value is 'test value #' (This is due to # symbol)
# : [21] Invalid character found
when the value is 'test value ' (This is due to the space at the end)
[37] Invalid character(s) found in data element
Actually datatype AN should allow these values right according to below link.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/49424822-af5e-4772-ac4e-8ed55e2f71a4/invalid-character-in-data-element-in-edi-message?forum=biztalkediandas2
Could any one help me in this?

AN allows what your encoding allows. If you have a # in a string, just need at least UNOC as encoding:
http://mohsinkalam.wordpress.com/encodings/
Morten la Cour

BizTalk SMTP Relay Issue

We go to send mail via SMTP from all of servers, we are only able to send mail to @Dell.com addresses only.(same network)
We would not able to send to all address (like an @Microsoft.com or an @csc.com address)
I am able to send an email to all address through dot net application but not Biztalk
Please share your thoughts how to resolve the issue

I hope your .Net Application sending e-mail is NOT OUTLOOK? :D
From the BizTalk Server can you do an interactive SMTP session with the SMTP server and check if relay is permitted? If you get relay denied then very clearly the SMTP Server configuration requires modification. (the responses from the SMTP server are in
BOLD)
> telnet <your smtp server name/ip> 25
220 <your SMTP Server name> Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service, Version: 7.5.7601.17514
ready at Fri, 6 Mar 2015 11:45:03 +0530
HELO <your BizTalk Server FQDN>
250 <your BizTalk Server FQDN> Hello [<ip of your BizTalk Server>]
mail from: <some-email-address>@dell.com
250 2.1.0 <some-e-mail-address>@dell.com....Sender OK
rcpt to: <[email protected]>
What is the response? do you get "250 2.1.5 <[email protected]>" or "relay denied".
Either way you should get someone who know mail & messaging involved to help to ensure that it is not a SMTP issue.
I agree with Ashwin on this NOT being a BizTalk related issue.
Regards.

Is it true that microsoft is going to withdrawn e Biztalk Server 2010 certification ?

Refer
link
Being withdrawn on 31 July 2014
70-595 TS: Developing Business Process and Integration Solutions by Using Microsoft BizTalk Server 2010

Hi Mohit Kumar Gupta
For this BizTalk certification issue,
please contact support directly(http://support.microsoft.com),
Microsoft Certification experts can give precise answer for you.
Best regards
Angie Xu
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Integrating Dynamics AX to Microsoft CRM using biztalk

I like to know what is the way to integrate Dynamics AX with Dynamics CRM . For AX integration using biztalk no issue. I need to give a demo to integrate Dynamics AX with CRM using Biztalk. For demo I need to consume WCF service of AX and push that
data to CRM . How I can do that.
1)Consume AX service in Biztalk - Easy no issue
2)How I can push this dat to CRM -????? That is what I like to know .
I don't see there is adapter for Dynamics CRM . Basically we are trying to compare Biztalk with Mulesoft for this purpose.
So let me know what is option in Biztalk to integrate with CRM???

Follow below post ,it talk about integrate BizTalk with salesforce.com site.
after completing some development in the site, it generate the path(in my case "http://ap1.salesforce.com/services/wsdl/class/AGT_GlobalId". ) to integrate from biztalkk
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/22c22e51-80bb-4dbe-a048-25d518e0dece/biztalk-2010-integration-with-sales-forcecrm?forum=biztalkr2adapters

Maintaining BizTalk Assembly Sizes

Hi Everyone
What might be the best way to maintain the size of ever-growing BizTalk assemblies in projects which continually expand?
We currently have a solution in which one of the projects holds all our schema's and it is currently 20 MB in size. I have found that the deployment of a large assembly file to BizTalk causes issues with the snap-in control. It still works but takes a while
to deploy the assembly successfully generating a few warnings about the console freezing up.
Is the best solution to split the schema files into different projects within the solution and just maintain the correct references? Could this result in some unwanted issues?
Regards
Riaz

Microsoft has already very well documented its recommendation to have projects size not exceed 10 MB for better performance and to avoid any unwanted compilation issues.
Avoid
compilation errors caused by projects that are too large
The Visual Studio compiler will not successfully compile a project if it would result in an assembly
larger than 75 megabytes. When the compiler reaches a size constraint it will emit fatal error CS0013 "Unexpected error writing metadata to file <filename>" and halt.
To avoid this problem, we recommend that projects not exceed 10 megabytes unless absolutely necessary.
Why?
Smaller projects are potentially simpler to deploy because there are fewer deployment steps. And with smaller projects the steps are more
likely to be closely related -- managing trading partner discounts or handling RFPs.
It is easier to isolate bugs, deployment issues, and other problems when using smaller projects. Finding a bug in a project with 140 schemas
and many custom maps and scripts will be more difficult than finding one in a project with only 10 schemas and a few custom maps and scripts.
Separating a large project into smaller projects can reduce complexity. The smaller projects are more manageable.
Smaller projects compile faster.
Splitting a large project with many unrelated schemas into smaller projects with strongly related schemas may result in better performance. This is because
only some of the assemblies will be loaded at a time. (This answers your question)
Refer: Considerations When Creating BizTalk Projects
Few benefits of having comparatively small size projects.
Projects based on the logical grouping of the artifacts (functionality for example), reduces the possibility of modifying aspects of your solution that aren’t related
to the problem you’re working on at the time.
Splitting of work among developer is easy.
Easier to test
It takes less time to load BizTalk solutions in Visual Studio. No out of memory issues.
Makes it possible to version artifacts separately.
A one-size-fits-all approach does not exist – you need to think about how you want to manage the solution during development, deployment and
maintenance in the context of the functionality that the solution provides to your organization or clients.
Rachit

Duplicate File issue using FTP adapter - BizTalk 2010

Hi We encountered an Issue of picking Duplicate files in BizTalk 2010 from the FTP Location. Need your assistance on this.
Mainframe sends multiple files a 0 KB file to FTP and BizTalk picks during a particular service window using FTP Adapter.
Receive Location has a pipeline component which decodes the MF file(EBCDICRow format).
Send Port transmits the file which is decoded in the Receive location. There is no mapping or orchestration involved.
When 2 files are placed in FTP Location. BizTalk Transmits the files successfully
No suspended messages in BizTalk but we see below error in event log. we tried reproduce the issue but no luck.
Host Instance running FTP Location is Clustered
There was a failure executing the receive pipeline: "XXXX.XX.Pipelines.Receive_XXX_TransactionsMC_passthru, XXX.XX.Pipelines, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=c2d1f476d5c2f97d"
Source: "EbcdicRowDeCode" Receive Port: "XXX.XX.MCSTransactionsMC" URI: "ftp://XXXXXXXX:21/'XXXX'/MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D*.T*" Reason: Unable to cast object of type 'Microsoft.BizTalk.Streaming.BasicStreamWrapper' to type 'XXX.BizTalk.Pipeline.Components.Streams.V3.VirtualStream
MF Puts below Files at FTP Location
PSNOX.MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D150406.T009000
PSNOX.MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D150406.T002100
BizTalk Picks ( at specified Service window) and Transmits as
PSNOX.MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D150406.T009000
PSNOX.MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D150406.T009000
PSNOX.MCSDT.DEFKOP.R001.D150406.T002100
Regards
-Sri

Hi Sri,
There could be two reason for such a behavior:
1) Using Non-Clustered Hosts: It is always recommended to use the clustered host for FTP adapter. Because FTP don't allow
any locking mechanism on the files so in case of non-clustered with multiple host instances you might receive same file multiple times through different host instances.
2) If the original document is still being written to the FTP server by the host application, the FTP adapter cannot
delete the document and will retrieve another copy of the document at the next polling interval that is configured for the receive location. This behavior causes document duplication to occur.
Workaround could be:
Configure the host application to write to a temporary folder on the same hard disk as the public FTP folder and to periodically move the contents of the temporary folder
to the FTP folder. The temporary folder should be on the same hard disk as the public FTP folder to make sure that the move operation is atomic. An atomic operation is an operation that is functionally indivisible. If you write data to the public FTP folder
by using the BizTalk Server FTP adapter, you can do this by specifying a Temporary Folder property in the FTP Transport Properties dialog box when you configure a send port. If you specify a Temporary Folder property, make sure that this folder is on the same
physical disk as the public FTP folder.
Configure the FTP receive location to operate within a service window when the host application is not writing data to the FTP server. You can specify the service window
when you configure the receive location properties.
Refer: Known Issues with the FTP
Adapter
Rachit
Please mark as answer or vote as helpful if my reply does

Issues connecting BizTalk 2013 WCF to Microsoft CRM 2011 using ADFS

I have a Microsoft CRM 2011 instance I'm trying to connect to from BizTalk 2013 using WCF. The CRM instance is using ADFS based security
and basic "domain/user" "password" security. The OrganizationService has the following policy in the WSDL.
<wsp:Policy wsu:Id="CustomBinding_IOrganizationService_policy">
<wsp:ExactlyOne>
<wsp:All>
<ms-xrm:AuthenticationPolicy xmlns:ms-xrm="http://schemas.microsoft.com/xrm/2011/Contracts/Services">
<ms-xrm:Authentication>Federation</ms-xrm:Authentication>
<ms-xrm:SecureTokenService>
<ms-xrm:Identifier>http://example.com/adfs/services/trust</ms-xrm:Identifier>
</ms-xrm:SecureTokenService>
</ms-xrm:AuthenticationPolicy>
<sp:TransportBinding xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:TransportToken>
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:HttpsToken/>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:TransportToken>
<sp:AlgorithmSuite>
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:Basic256/>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:AlgorithmSuite>
<sp:Layout>
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:Strict/>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:Layout>
<sp:IncludeTimestamp/>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:TransportBinding>
<sp:EndorsingSupportingTokens xmlns:sp="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:IssuedToken sp:IncludeToken="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702/IncludeToken/AlwaysToRecipient">
<Issuer xmlns="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-securitypolicy/200702">
<Address xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous</Address>
<Metadata xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
<Metadata xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/mex" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<wsx:MetadataSection xmlns="">
<wsx:MetadataReference>
<Address xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing">
https://example.com/adfs/services/trust/mex
</Address>
</wsx:MetadataReference>
</wsx:MetadataSection>
</Metadata>
</Metadata>
</Issuer>
<sp:RequestSecurityTokenTemplate>
<trust:KeyType xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/SymmetricKey
</trust:KeyType>
<trust:KeySize xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">256</trust:KeySize>
<trust:Claims xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512" Dialect="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity">
<wsid:ClaimType xmlns:wsid="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity" Uri="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/upn"/>
</trust:Claims>
<trust:KeyWrapAlgorithm xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#rsa-oaep-mgf1p</trust:KeyWrapAlgorithm>
<trust:EncryptWith xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#aes256-cbc</trust:EncryptWith>
<trust:SignWith xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#hmac-sha1</trust:SignWith>
<trust:CanonicalizationAlgorithm xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">http://www.w3.org/2001/10/xml-exc-c14n#</trust:CanonicalizationAlgorithm>
<trust:EncryptionAlgorithm xmlns:trust="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512">http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#aes256-cbc</trust:EncryptionAlgorithm>
</sp:RequestSecurityTokenTemplate>
<wsp:Policy>
<sp:RequireInternalReference/>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:IssuedToken>
</wsp:Policy>
</sp:EndorsingSupportingTokens>
</wsp:All>
</wsp:ExactlyOne>
</wsp:Policy>
I've set up the following client configuration:
<binding name="ws2007FederationHttpBinding">
<security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential">
<message>
<issuer address="https://adfs20.example.com/adfs/services/trust/2005/usernamemixed"
binding="wsHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="stsBinding" />
<issuerMetadata address="https://adfs20.example.com/adfs/services/trust/mex" />
</message>
</security>
</binding
And referencing this for adfs specific communication
<wsHttpBinding>
<clear />
<binding name="stsBinding">
<security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential">
<transport clientCredentialType="None"/>
<message clientCredentialType="UserName" establishSecurityContext="false"/>
</security>
</binding>
</wsHttpBinding>
As I try using it I get the receive the following error message
A message sent to adapter "WCF-Custom" on send port "SendPort6" with URI "https://crm-test.example.com/XRMServices/2011/Organization.svc" is suspended.
Error details: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: MSIS3127: The specified request failed.
Server stack trace:
at System.ServiceModel.Security.IssuanceTokenProviderBase`1.DoNegotiation(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.IssuanceTokenProviderBase`1.GetTokenCore(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.IdentityModel.Selectors.SecurityTokenProvider.GetToken(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.Tokens.IssuedSecurityTokenProvider.GetTokenCore(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.IdentityModel.Selectors.SecurityTokenProvider.GetToken(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityProtocol.TryGetSupportingTokens(SecurityProtocolFactory factory, EndpointAddress target, Uri via, Message message, TimeSpan timeout, Boolean isBlockingCall, IList`1& supportingTokens)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.SecureOutgoingMessageAtInitiator(Message& message, String actor, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.TransportSecurityProtocol.SecureOutgoingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecurityProtocol.SecureOutgoingMessage(Message& message, TimeSpan timeout, SecurityProtocolCorrelationState correlationState)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.SecurityChannelFactory`1.SecurityRequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecuritySessionSecurityTokenProvider.DoOperation(SecuritySessionOperation operation, EndpointAddress target, Uri via, SecurityToken currentToken, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecuritySessionSecurityTokenProvider.GetTokenCore(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.IdentityModel.Selectors.SecurityTokenProvider.GetToken(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Security.SecuritySessionClientSettings`1.ClientSecuritySessionChannel.OnOpen(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.OnOpen(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.CommunicationObject.Open()
Exception rethrown at [0]:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
at System.ServiceModel.ICommunicationObject.Open()
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.GetChannel[TChannel](IBaseMessage bizTalkMessage, ChannelFactory`1& cachedFactory)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.SendMessage(IBaseMessage bizTalkMessage)
MessageId: {0A8D8BB1-0838-43AF-B3A1-D63D432C22AA}
InstanceID: {B57B4979-2187-4CF7-8115-4D65B3952982}
What am I missing ..?
http://www.richardhallgren.com

Hi Angie and Richard
Currently I am also having the similar issue and I tried the settings you mentioned. But I get his error
The adapter failed to transmit message going to send port "WcfSendPort_OrganizationService_CustomBinding_IOrganizationService" with URL "https://examplecrm.com/XRMServices/2011/Organization.svc".
It will be retransmitted after the retry interval specified for this Send Port. Details:"System.ServiceModel.FaultException: The message with Action 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' cannot be processed at the receiver, due
to a ContractFilter mismatch at the EndpointDispatcher. This may be because of either a contract mismatch (mismatched Actions between sender and receiver) or a binding/security mismatch between the sender and the receiver. Check that sender and receiver
have the same contract and the same binding (including security requirements, e.g. Message, Transport, None).
By any chance did you go through this error or do you have any suggestions?I am trying to connect from WCF-Custom adapter on BizTalk 2010 to CRM 2013 using ADFS.
Thanks
Narri

Biztalk functoid issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for