ED not calculating in PO
Dear All,
I am raising a consumable PO in which I am giving only description only. In J1ID for the blank material code and plant combintaion I have maintained chapter ID and for chapter ID tax rate also maintained.
When I am giving the tax code and seen in the Taxes icon, ED is not calculating.
Pls Guide how to calculate the taxes for this scenario. FYI Tax procedure is TAXINJ.
Rgds
Srini
If you are working with -TAXINJ
If basic CIN-TAXINJ setting are proper then check for the master data.
At Master data level
1] First check the Chaprter ID rates Validity Date i.e From date to To data.
2] Check vendor Excise details maitained it or not in -J1ID
3] Maitain Chapter with blank in Material + chapter Id combination.
4]Then check Tax code for Values i.e 100% and 2%,1% are maitained for Conditions.
with regards
Shrinivas gangoor
Similar Messages
-
Pension not calculated when EE is hired mid-month
Hi All
Please suggest for the following....
When an Employee is hired in the middle of the month, the system doesn't calculate Pension Contribution.
Like if an EE is hired on 10th April. The system will calculate all payments & deductions, but it is not calculating the Pension Contributions.
I am maintaining IT 169, 171 for Pension Contribution.
The problem I found behind this is.....(WIth the help of an ABAPer)
-: System checks the Payroll Period Start Date with the Org. Assignment start date. When it doesnu2019t match, the system does not calculate the Pension Contribution.
For the time being I solved this through the following action -: In debugging, I canceled this condition (skipped this check). Then it calculated the Pension Contribution.
But, this is not the right solution for achieving that as we are changing standard SAP coding.
Please suggest any solution for the same.
Thanks & RegardsIf your schema has p0169 with BEG that will happen, try put below Param1 which fits your requirement.
BEG
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period begin date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record ends
within the current payroll period.
END
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll period end date.
No changes within the current payroll period are taken into
consideration.
No proration of contributions takes place, even if the record begins
within the current payroll period.
CHK
Infotype records are evaluated on the payroll check date (the pay date),
regardless of whether the check date falls into the payroll period
itself.
A record whose validity starts after the end date of the current payroll
period is still evaluated if the check date (which lies in the future)
falls within the validity period of the infotype.
FRST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The first intersection is taken to
determine the full period deduction amount which is stored without
proration.
LAST
Infotype records are evaluated if there is any intersection of plan
infotype and payroll period. The last intersection is taken to determine
the full period deduction amount which is stored without proration. -
Due date not calculated in F-28
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if in standard SAP, in F-28 (incoming payment) why the due date (or payment date) is not calculated ?
I fulfilled posting date and document date (both 01/09/2009) and payment terms also (Z100 - 90 days end of month), but after saving the document and when i check it in FB03, i found that payment date (or due date) still 01/09/2009 and not 30/11/2009.
Can someone explain why and in which cases SAP dosn't calculate the due date ?
In advance, thank you for helpHi,
The transaction F-28 - Incoming payment, in general it is used for receiving payments. Then what is your requirement to calculate due data from posting date of this document. Are you referring to value date in the bank item? The due date will be calculated from baseline date in invoice, in this case you need to check the baseline date in the invoice (open item), right?
Correct me, if my understanding on your requirement is wrong.
thanks,
Kumar -
Overheads not calculated in CK11N cost estimation
Hi all,
I have two issues
1. When i am executing CK11N,i am not able to get the overhead calculation in itemization,but its showing some ridiculess firgure in cost component structure.I am using dependency D020.
2 . when i am using dependency D050 the system not calculating overheads.
We have single plant with two process Repetative and Process order.I want to calculate the overhead on the Order type basis but the system is not calculating the overhead.
So i changed the dependency to D050,now its showing the overhead figure in cost component structure but whic is not matching with the overhead rate i have given..
as my go live is 20 of this month .....its bit emergency
Revert
Regards
PranHi all,
Thnx for your reply.
But i have maintained all the entries in the respective area,even though i am geeting the issue.
It was working fine for my previous repetative manufacturing ...i am using the single cost sheet for both repetative and process order.
And one more thing is that i have a Semi finished goods which is the output of REIM order and is included in process order of the finished good.
The system is calculating the overheads for the semi finished good too once again.
Eg,
Raw Material A and B produces Semi finish material C overheads and the utilities are calculated correctly in Repetative manufacturing.
The semi finished material C is used in producing the finished material D ....in which the system is not caculating the utilities.The big problem is that the figure(value) of itemzation and the Cost component structure is showing two different values.
I am not sure and able to know how and why the system calculates and from where it gets these values ...... totally confussed and under pressure (may not be able to to explain properly).
Revert
Pran -
Depreciation not calculated and posted
Dear All
I have a problem. Actually we had a legacy data transfer last year in the month of March.
All the assets were posted to new company code fronm the old company code by using an initial clearing account.
the entries were done through f-02.
My problem lies in the fact that 4 assets which were posted at that time are not functioning well.
The balances got transfered as opening balances in Aw01n but there is no planned depreciation for them for the year 09-10.The amounts are coming as " zero" in the planned depreciation tab.
As a result of which my asset acquisition reports are not coming correct.
I have figured out the diiferences..
The differences are regarding these 4 assets only.
Could any of you please help me in finding the reason why the depreciation is not calculated on these assets since April 2009 and how they are appearing "ZERO" in the acquistion report when there is a actual balance in the asset
Thanking you
regards
RubyHi
I have checked the asset in the previous company code also.. All the parameters are same..plus in that company code the sysytem has shown the planneed depreciation too for all the assets.
now I think the problem lies in the depreciation key or in some linking between depreciation key and the asset..
have you any clue about the areas that needs to be checked for this sort of linkage?
Plus there is no over charging of depreciation.... The system didnot calculate anything in the present company code.........
Regards
Ruby jamwal -
Income tax is not calculated After Total Income
Dear All,
I am running my payroll but my Income tax is not calculating properly because when am seeing my log then i find my total income is calculated properly but after that my STANDARD DEDUCTION is not been happening according to the rule if the employe is men it should be deducted 150,000 but it's not happenings . In payroll log where i can see the this (STANDARD DEDUCTION)amount because am not able to find how much deduction is happenings.My employe joining date is 01.05.2009
I am giving my salary components.
Basic-19500
HRA-13650
Performance-15000
LIC(IT0586 80C)-35215
Tution Fee(IT0586 80 C)-16800
Calculated PF-2340
CAlcualtion is done on the basis of 11 month
Gross Salary 529,650.00
Exemption U/S 10 107,250.00 (HRA Annual Ex)
Balance 422,400.00
Incm under Hd Salary 422,400.00
Gross Tot Income 422,400.00
Agg of Chapter VI 77,755.00
Total Income 344,650.00 (Till Here Every thng is fine From the next level am not able to identify how much and which basis MY Standard deduction is calculated)
Tax on total Income 52,395.00
Tax payable and surcharg 53,967.00
Income Tax 4,906.00
Kindly help me to resolve this issue am not a functional guy.
Thanks
SandeepDear Siknder ,
I alredy check in it0002 it male.
I want to know how should i check in my payroll log what calculation is happening after my total income get.
And also how i can identify which finacial year calculation is been performed. -
Excise Duties is not Calculating in Excise Invoice
Hi Experts,
I am doing CIN configuration, i did all configuration settings, I did classify condition types also, but i am not getting Excise duties is not calculating in to Excise INVOICE, please help me with solution
Thanks
SESHUPlease try to develop the habit of updating the forum properly so that it will be helpful to all. The comment what you have added is not going to solve the problem.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
BED is not calculating values after enter Excise Invoice number in MIGO
Hi,
We are doing a process of MB01 --> J1IEX --> MIGO.
At the time of J1IEX, we entered the Excise Invoice number and date. After that when we change the quantity, then BED is automatically change.
But at the time of MIGO, when we enter the Excise Invoice number, then BED is not calculating as calculated in J1IEX earlier.
This was working fine before apply the Patch. I think this is due to Patch because in our Development system still working fine but we have apply the Patch in Quality Server..there this problem comes..
Please guide what should be configuration changes has been done after apply the patch.
Applied Patch is: - SAPKH60015 & SAPKH60016..
Plz guide..hi
i think your doing something wrong
i think first when u did j1iex then in MIGo u have to go for ONLY REFER INVOICE option
better you go for other process
DO GR for required quantity say 5 out of 10 without excise
then do J1iex with reference to GR number
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on Jul 28, 2010 9:15 AM -
HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj SainiHi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards -
Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay
Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
KoutilyaHi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK -
SQL query not calculating
gross_amount is giving the value of extended_amount and the gross_price_rc is giving the value of unit_selling_price
select customer_trx_line_id,
( extended_amount / 1- (decode(decode(attribute6,null,0)+decode(attribute7,null,0)+decode(attribute8,null,0)+decode(attribute9,null,0)/100,null,0,1,0))) GROSS_AMOUNT,
( unit_selling_price /1-(decode(decode(attribute6,null,0)+decode(attribute7,null,0)+decode(attribute8,null,0)+decode(attribute9,null,0)/100,null,0,1,0))) gross_price_rc
from ra_customer_trx_lines_all
where attribute6 is not null or attribute7 is not null or attribute8 is not null or attribute9 is not null
whats the isuue here??
Thanksdecode(attribute7,null,0)Looking at it again, this always returns 0 or NULL, so it not really surprising
DECODE
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/functions040.htm#i1017437
CASE
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/expressions004.htm#i1033392 -
Invoice Days are not calculating when a Days limit exists.
Hello,
We are having an issue with both our Customer and Vendor invoices.
When using a 'payment term' with a 'Days limit' the Due date is not calculating at all. The 'Days' field in the 'Payment tab' just comes up as a blank.
This functionality used to work, something must have changed in the system.
This is how I have the Payment term setup.
ZY87 (days limit 10). 120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
Default for Baseline Date = Document Date
Fixed Date = 10, Additional months = 4
ZY87 (days limit 25) 120 days invoice date (10th & 25th)
Default for Baseline date = Document Date
Fixed Date = 25, Additional months = 4.
When I choose this payment term in the invoice, I get no value to show up in the 'Days' box and when I save it, the Due date becomes the Baseline Date.
Any idea why?
thanks for your help!
BrettThanks for your immediate response.
i have maintained all the ticks for the counting rule for LOP absence type. but in the infotype it still shows 22 days instead of 31 days for the month of oct.
Regards,
MVN -
F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating
Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
PrabinYou are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.
-
Bank charges is not calculating at the time of payment to vendor by APP
hi experts,
In APP the paying company is paying to the vendor.Now they want to issue a DD (Demand Draft) to the vendor where a bank charges is involved.
I have already customized the CHRGES/EXPENSES in Bank Determination Tab (transaction Code FBZP) to the corresponding Bank Subledger(outgoing) and also the Charge Indicator to the corressponding House Bank.
the transaction key BSP is already assigned with the ledger(Bank Charges)
I have already checked the Field status variant, it is ok
But , that system is not calculating the bank charges as it is configured in the system at the time of payment through APP when a full MM invoice verification cycle is running
Can anybody help me out?
With regards,
Sudipto PaulYou have to select update profile, which works with payment budget. Secondly, you have to define the settings for payment transfer in OF29 transaction. You should consult the following notes, in order to secure smooth payment transfer procedure:
For online update:
Note 1695556 - Main features of Customizing for onilne payment update
Note 882379 - FMPU_R: Recommendations for the online payment update
In general:
Note 400924 - Recommendations and rules for the payment transfer in FM
Note 1466979 - FM Financial transactions to be used in FI line items -
BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST not calculating TAX
Hi,
I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for posting the FI document for RC type. I tried posting it normally and it posted correctly. But when i give some ACCOUNT TAX information, it is not calculating.
Here is how I am filling the details.
Header:
BUS_ACT = RFBU.
USERNAME = SY_UNAME.
HEADER_TEXT = TEXT.
COMP_CODE = BUKRS.
DOC_DATE = 12/12/2011
PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011.
FIS_PERIOD = 00
REF_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
AC_DOC_NO = 9700000036.
Account GL Table:.
ITEMNO_ACC = 10.
GL_ACCOUNT = 412010.
DOC_TYPE = RC.
COMP_CODE = RECN.
FIS_PERIOD = 00.
PSTNG_DATE = 12/05/2011
TAX_CODE = TN
TAXJURCODE = TN3707600
COST CENTER = 107
Account Receivable:
ITEMNO_ACC = 20.
CUSTOMER = 1126045
COMP_CODE = RECN
BLINE_DATE = 12/12/2011.
PYMT_METH = B
CURRENCY AMOUNT : 2 LINE ITEMS
1ST LINE ITEM
ITEMNO_ACC = 10
CURRENCY = USD
AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00-
DISC_BASE = 500.00-.
2ND LINE ITEM
ITEMNO_ACC = 20
CURRENCY = USD
AMT_DOCCUR = 500.00
AMT_BASE = 500.00.
I did not enter the account tax table as I am not sure how to enter the date. But I know that the tax rate is 9.25% and for 500 the tax would be 42.33. I need to make sure that the BAPI posts the document as it posts from FB01 when we check the check box 'calculate tax'. Right now, with these details it is posting the data but not calculating the tax.
Please help.
Regards
Guru
Edited by: GuruCharan on Dec 15, 2011 6:28 PMRaymond,
Thanks for the reply. I did read the notes you have suggested. They are quite informative but unfortunately -
Note 367175 is related to the other BAPI`s. My issue is with the BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.
Note 487064 is related to the error when the tax amount is greater than the base amount.
Since I am using the Acc document post BAPI, please help me understand how to fill in the data for ACCOUNT TAX table or post the document from the BAPI along with the tax as it does in FB01.
Thanks Again,
Regards,
Guru.
Maybe you are looking for
-
MIRO : split line item into multiple
I have senario were we need to split 1 PO line into multiple line items in MIRO due to different tax applicable for different amounts....
-
Connect to Visual Admin - xmla connector - java - mdx
I'm trying to code (Java) a direct execution of an MDX statement using the BI XMLA Connector. I've set-up visual adminstrator with the connector information and followed the instructions from the link below. I am still unable to establish a connect
-
Directing domains with a certain TLD to specific nameserver
I have been looking for a way to handle this under Linux, using Mac OSX's resolver system makes this easy. What my goal is I want to run a lightweight dns server on my local machine that takes all requests to a specific TLD, say requests to example.
-
I'm having problem with my iphone4S first when i updated software to 7.1 after a month or so wifi turned grayed, second when i tried to turn off in the night as soon as i turn it on battery empty now its totaly dead. What should i do with it?
-
Is there a Listener available that will be actioned if text is changed within a JLabel? Thanks, Harold