BPM Sync/Async Problem

I am trying to setup the sync/Async bridge.Scenario is below.
Receive (Open Sync/Async Bridge) --> Send Async > Receive Async> Send (Close sync/Async)
I am doing exactly those steps which is provided in Pattern.
Following are in the interfaces.
Sync Interface to post message to BPM (OutBound)
(This interface is exposed as WebService)
Abstract Sync Interface used by BPM.
Async Abstract Interface for Request Message used by Container.
Async Abstract Interface for Response Message used by Container.
Async Inbound Interface to receive message sent by BPM in Async Send Process.
Async Outbound Interface to send message to BPM by Async Receive.
All the configuration Sender agreement/receieve agreement/interface determination/Receive Determination looks fine.
On posting soap data I get the following exception.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>

<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
 <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
 <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">NO_RECEIVER_CASE_BE</SAP:Code>
 <SAP:P1/>
 <SAP:P2/>
 <SAP:P3/>
 <SAP:P4/>
 <SAP:AdditionalText/>
 <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace=""/>
 <SAP:Stack>No receiver could be determined</SAP:Stack>
 <SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Any pointers will be great help!
Thanks,
Samir

Hi Samir
As you are trying Sync/Async BPM scenario and having a webservice as your sender,go through this link as it is quite similar to your scenario--
https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/weblogs.sdn?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
If you still face error then post it in forum.
Regards
Arpit Seth

Similar Messages

In BPM sync/async Step , can you have different message schema?

Scenario:
File to XI to BPM to SOAP to RFC
In order to trigger the webservice , I use a dummy file which will be polled at a certain frequency- once in 30 minutes in Test mode - this will call the Webservice. The answer of webservice is sent to RFC Async.
so these are the Repository objects I created :
1. File Outbound Async Message Interface- Output Message (File_Request_MT)
2.File Abstract Message Interface-Output Message (File_Request_MT)
3.Async/ sync bridge Abstract interface to call the Webservice
4 Webservice Inbound Sync Message interface- with both input and output message
5.RFC Inbound Async message interface- input message (RFC_Request)
6 RFC Abstract Async Message interface-input message (RFC_Request)
BPM
a) Receive step which uses the the object 2.
b) Sync send which uses object 3
c) Send step which uses Object 5
I am using a BPM to Receive the file data/ "request " by using the File abstract message interface
Then use the the object 3 to call the webservice in BPM .
My question is on this step
Can I have for the abstract Interface(Object 3) the Request message as File_Request_MT and
response message as (RFC_Request) ?
I use a message mapping to map Input and Ouput message of Object 3 with Object 4.
Thanks for your insight

Raj,
Thanks for the feedback , but I have a question regarding your reply
Interface Objects
Object 1: File_Request_Abs
Object 2: Soap_Response_Abs
Object 3:Soap_Abs_Synch
Output Message:File_Request_Abs
Input Message:Soap_Response_Abs
Object 4:Rfc_Request_Abs
The question is about
a)SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS : could you please tell me why do we need an abstract interface -SOAP_RESPONSE_ABS?
I created a message type MT_SOAP_RESPONSE and used that in the BPM sync Send step as the Input message.
b)Soap_Abs_Synch- I am using message types
MT_File_request and MT_SOAP_Response From your reponse, it looks like you are suggesting to use
Abstract Interfaces as Output message and Input Message, am I correct? Could you please tell me whether this has advantages over using message types MT_file_request and MT_soap_reponse? I haven't used Abstract interfaces before as Input message and output message; infact, I wasn't even aware that it can be. Please confirm that it is possible. Thank you for increasing my knowledge !!!
These are the Objects I created
Message Type :
a) MT_Filerequest
b) MT_SOAPresponse
Message Interface
a)MI_Filerequest_out_async -
Output message
Mess. type MT_filerequst
b)MI_filerequest_async_abs-
Mess. type MT_filerequst
Used
i) used for BPM receiver step- container definition
ii) receiver determination
c)MI_webservice_sync_in - This is created from External definition
d)MI_webservice_sync_abs-
Input message - MT_soapresponse
Output message- MT_fierequest
Used:
i) used for BPM sync send step ,
ii)Interface mapping between MI_Webservice_sync_in and MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)Container element-SOAP_response
e) MI_RFC_async_out
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
g) MI_RFC_async_abs
Input message
RFC_Request(This is imported from RFC definition)
Mapping
Message mapping
i)Filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Source: MT_Filerequest
Target: SOAPrequest(Got from External definition)
ii)SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
Source : SOAPresponse(got from External definition)
Target : MT_SOAPresponse
Interface Mapping
i)IM_BPM_TO_SOAP
Source Interface : MI_webservice_sync_abs
Target :MI_webservice_sync_in
uses following message mapping
Request : filerequest_TO_SOAPrequest
Response:SOAPresponse_TO_BPM_response
BPM container element
i)Receiver_container TYPE MI_Filerequest_out_async
ii)SOAP Responsecontainer TYPE MI_webservice_sync_abs
iii)RFC_Request_container TYPE MI_RFC_async_abs
BPM flow
Receive---->Send Synch-->Transformation----->Send Asynch
Receive -
> receiver_container
Send Synch -
> receiver_container(Request Message), Soap_response_container(Response Message)
Transformation -
> Source(Soap_response_container), Target(RFC_request_container)
Send Asynch -
> RFC_request_container
Thanks for your help!!!

BPM Sync/Async Scenario: error: "Timeout condition of pipeline reached"..!

Hi,
I am doing Sync/Async BPM scenario.
-> Receive message and process and response back to the sender.
Sometimes it will correct correctly. Sometime the message will come and stay in XI and fails with error
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I observed that the messages will stay in transaction "SXMS_SAMON" . and will fail after sometime.
What might be the reason. ? what need to do to stop these kind of errors?
Thanks
Deepthi.

Hi Praveen,
Webservice <--> XI -->BW .
BPM :
start ->Receive(Request)> Transformation(Responsemap)>Send(SendtoBW)->Send(Send Response) ---> stop.
Messages are getting struck in SMQ1 and SM58 at these three points.
1. Message comes and stays in SXMB_MONI in status "Log Version"
The messages are stuck in SMQ1 in READY status without doing any processing.
XBQO$PE_WS90100002 WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 1 READY 26.02.2009
Once I push the queue by Activating/Unlocking, it will process.
2. when it is trying to send the message to R/3 (Backend system) it is waiting in SM58 with below entry.
WF-BATCH SWW_WI_EXECUTE_INTERNAL_RFC WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 Transaction recorded
Manually I execute LUW to push it. Once I done the message will go to R/3 system and Response mapping also complete.
3. Again it is waiting at SM58 with below deatails while sending the response to sender.
PIAFUSER SWW_WI_COMP_EVENT_RECEIVE_IBF WORKFLOW_LOCAL_100 Transaction recorded
we are again manually execute LUW. Once we done the response message will go back to Sender.
Any Idea to solve this..?
Thanks
Deepthi

BPM Sync/Async Bridge

Hi,
I am trying to build a Async/Sync Bridge in BPM. However the difference is that I need the response to be sent to a different third party to the one which sent it.
The complete scenario is as follows: A third party sends an XML file - this is picked up with the file adapter. PI then does the appropriate mapping and calls a BAPI on ECC. The response is then sent back to PI and sent to a different third parties WebService.
I have followed the document "Demonstrating How to Use Async/Sync Bridge in BPM" by Leela Ratna Morampudi.
Sending the response back to the original sender is straight forward engough. However Im not sure how to send it back to a different third party? Is this possible? Any help would be appreciated
Also, Is it possible to build this scenario using a JMS Async/Sync bridge and avoid using a BPM?
Rg,
Krishneel

Hi Swarup,
Thanks for your posts.
I have built everything, however I'm facing some problems with the RFC receiver. In the communication channel monitor I see this error:
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: could not get functionname from XML requst: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.RfcAdapterException: failed to read funtionname from XML document: missing namespace declaration(2)
Do you know what could be wrong?
I have already tried reimporting the BAPI and refreshing the caches without any luck.
Thanks,
Krishneel

BPM sync-async bridge returns status "to be delivered"

Hi experts!
I have a BPM consisting of the following steps:
1. Receive (open S/A bridge): Msg SalesOrder
2. Transformation: create Msg SalesOrderResponse
3. Send (close S/A bridge): SalesOrderResponse (to sending system)
4. Send (async send): SalesOrder (to receiver system)
RWB shows 4 messages when the scenario is executed:
Sender - BPM
BPM - BPM
BPM - Sender
BPM - Receiver
The BPM works in that both the sender and receiver system receives the expected messages (SalesOrderResponse and SalesOrder), but the RWB returns the status "To be delivered" for the message from Sender to BPM and from BPM to BPM.
SXMB_MONI shows one message only, which is successful, and the PE_ADAPTER shows the BPM as completed.
Do you know why the status is "to be delivered", when the messages are received correctly at both sender and receiver system?
How can we make all messages involved in the scenario successful?
Thank you very much for any help!
Br,
Kenneth

Thank you, but I have already re-created all interfaces and the BPM in IR, and reimported to ID. I do not get any error messages anywhere, SXI_CACHE is OK (return code 0 for BPM), SWWL contains no old processes.
Another maybe useful piece of information:
the two messages returning "To be delivered" status in RWB both exist for Integration Engine. The first, for Sender -> BPM, the inbound channel is AENGINE and outbound channel is SA_COMM. Could it be that SA_COMM does not notify AENGINE that it has received the message?
The other message with the same status is from BPM -> BPM, with message interface SalesOrderResponse_ABS both for sender and receiver, which I don't understand why. This interface should only be used from BPM to sender... There is no inbound or outbound channel specified for this message.
So is the BPM sending some information to itself through the same message interface?
Any clues?

Exercise for sync/async bridge scenario

Hi,
Can anybody send me exercise scenario or link for sync/async bridge scenario?
Thanks
Narayana

Hi Balaji,
pls check this weblogs
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
/people/dmitry.govberg/blog/2006/12/20/mainframe-and-sap-integration--the-synchronous-case
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
conversations
Sync - Async Bridge
BPM Sync/Async Problem
BPM Design using sync-async bridge
Regards,
Ram

BPM - Receive Sync/ASync Bridge Problem

Hi,
I am creating a scenario for an inbound Synch request to be serviced by a BPM process.
Here is the problem that I am facing while trying to configure the Receive Step
- I created a Message Interface defined as Abstract Synchronous.
- I created a process model and put in a Receive Step: Mode - Opens S/A Bridge, Synchronous Interface - defined as above.
- I define a container with Abstract type. But when I try to locate the above defined Abstract Synch message interface, I cannot find it.
- As a workaround, I create another Abstract Message Interface defined as Abstract ASynch.
- I create a container with this Abstract ASynch message type.
- I use this container in the Receive Step.
But activating the Business Process gives the error:
Message to be received and Synchronous Interface do not have identical types.
Can someone give me the correct procedure to configure the Sync / ASync Bridge ? thanks,
-Manish

Dan,
This is the link you are looking for?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/83/d2a84028c9e469e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Sync/Async BPM scenario : Problem at Integration Process..!!

Hi All,
I am doing Sync/Async BPM scenario.
start ->Receive(Request)> Transformation(Responsemap)>Send(SendtoR/3)->Send(Send Response) ---> stop.
When Iam trying to Activate, Integration process giving errors as
Source parameter AA_Payment_Req | http://XXXXXXXXX.com/SAP_PI/DirectSales/Payment not set Target parameter AA_Payment_Response | http://XXXXXXX.com/SAP_PI/DirectSales/Payment not set
Warning: Container element Response is defined but is neither initialized nor used.
But I am using them in the BPM. The same kind of scenario is working for another interface which is already running in production. When I tried to check that interface it is showing only Warning message as Container element Response is defined but is neither initialized nor used.
I tried deleting and creating again and still it is showing the same error.
Can anyone please suggest what might be the problem.
Regards
Deepthi

Hi,
could you pls let me know how its solved, while i am trying the same i am also getting the same problem..
could you pls explain bit more on this.
Thanks,
Venkat.

Sync/Async communication in JMS adapter without BPM

Hi,
as of SP19 XI's JMS adapter offers this new feature for Sync/Async communication through JMS Adapter modules instead of using a BPE.
Now I would be interested to know if anybody has already successfully used this feature especially using WebSphere MQ as a JMS Provider (preferredly in the mode JMS Compliant: WebSphere MQ (non-JMS)).
I experienced some issues with the XI Message ID being used as the JMS Correlation ID which is then mapped to the MQ Correlation ID being truncated after 24 characters. So I don't exactly know whether this is due to wrong setup or some general issues with this messaging system.
Please let me know if you have any experiences at all with this new feature (please do not just post links to the following blogs, which I have thoroughly studied as well as the How-to Guide concerning this topic)
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2007/01/18/syncasync-communication-in-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp19
/people/sudheer.babu2/blog/2007/01/18/asyncsync-communication-using-jms-adapter-without-bpm-sp-19
thanks & regards,
Peter

Hi Peter,
we working on the same Problem. Using IBM Websphere MQ as JMS Provider for the new feature: sync/async bridge without BPE.
we switched on a high level trace for the adapter framework and saw a problem in the receiving Object of the JMS correlation id. The notify bean receives the JMS correlationid in hex format. so the beans have two different correlations, which could not find together.
did you have any solution to get this new feature works with IBM Websphere ?
thanks
joachim

Call sync BPM from Async BPM - issue

Hi,
Outline: I'm trying to call a synchronous BPM from an asynchronous BPM in a PI 7.0 SP 14 system.
When doing so i get the following error: Object CL_SWF_XI_MSG_BROKER method SEND_SYNCHRON cannot be executed.
Now this is an oldie when searching the forums for this error message. I do however fail to see a solution to the problem.
Note that the following notes (referred to in similar posts)
- 710445
- 718734
- 830803
are implemented since theese refer to older versions of PI.
My scenario is very simple at present since i've startet from scratch again after getting the error. So what i do is:
1) send async message to async BPM
2) async BPM receives request
3) async bpm transform request til sync_request.
4) async BPM calls synchronous BPM
5) sync BPM receives request and opens a async/sync bridge
6) sync BPM maps request to response
7) sync BPM sends response and closes async/sync bridge
8) async BPM reveices sync_response
9) async BPM sends sync_response to some application
Now step 8 i never succesfully executed. Instead the error earlier described is triggered.
For simplicity i use 1 and only 1 message type in all message interfaces. I have mapping between my synchronous interfaces outside of BPM.
The synchronus BPM is executed just fine. The only issue is getting the reponse back to the asynchronous BPM.
I am familiar with the following similar posts:
- Object CL_SWF_XI_MSG_BROKER method SEND_SYNCHRON cannot be executed
- Problem in posting the data in the syncronous mode
but find them to be of no use.
Hope someone can help.
Best Regards,
Daniel

Daniel Hans Engsig-Karup wrote:First you do not need any bridges if it is asyn/sync kind of a scenario in the second BPM. You need a bridge when the bpm has to wait with a sync call coming in and response in an async call. Essentially your BPMs (I donno why you need 2.. but let us go with 2)
>
>
> 1) send async message to async BPM
> 2) async BPM receives request
> 3) async bpm transform request til sync_request.
> 4) async BPM calls synchronous BPM
> 5) sync BPM receives request
(Remove this if you are calling a sync system here) and opens a async/sync bridge
> 6) sync BPM maps request to response
> 7) sync BPM sends response
Remove this and closes async/sync bridge
> 8) async BPM reveices sync_response
> 9) async BPM sends sync_response to some application
>
VJ

Need help with Sync/Async BPM Scenario

I have an R/3 RFC -> XI -> HTTP (to vendor A) scenario that is working fine. It is a totally synchronous call event. The Integration Directory pieces sit in a scenario named HotkeyOutbound.
Now I need to create a process for RFC -> XI -> HTTP (to vendor Panduit). The R/3 RFC is the same sender, but vendor Panduit only supports an asynchronous HTTP connection. I followed the Sriram Vasudevan weblog on Sync/Async Bridge and created my BPM. I am stuck on trying to determine what to set up in the Integration Directory.
First off, should I be able to use the same HotkeyOutbound scenario as with vendor A so all hotkey stuff can stay together? Or do I have to create a new scenario with a copy of the R/3 business system for the sender? I moved forward with a new scenario (PanduitHotkeyOutbound).
I also need to know how many config Agreements and Determinations to use. The image at http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/keith1.html shows what I have so far. Which are not needed? What is missing?
And I tried setting up an HTTP communication channel for outbound async to vendor Panduit and another for inbound async from vendor Panduit. XI won't let me set up a sender HTTP channel. Why not?
Thank you in advance.

I have yet to figure this out, and probably need to go back to my Integration Repository setup since my problems may start there. This screenshot shows my Repository objects.
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/intProcess.jpg
HELP! These are the steps I took, with questions embedded.
(1) Created data type and message type for xml document (note that same format is used for request and reply).
(2) Created PANRequestAbstractInterfaceSync (abstract and sync) for first part of Integration Process. Should the input message be the RFC or XML message type?
(3) Created PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync (abstract and async) for 2nd part of Integration Process.
(4) Created PANResponseToBPM_MessageInterface (outbound async) for interface back into XI from partner. Is this needed?
(5) Created PANHotkeySync_to_Async_IntProc Integration Process to handle sync to async bridge.
- Wondering why PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync is the only message interface available when I make container object (PANMessage)?
(6) Created two Message Mappings to handle RFC data to XML mappings (outbound RFC-> XML and inbound XML -> RFC).
(7) Created Interface Mapping that includes both the Request and Response message mapping programs from step six. Source is the RFC and Target is PANRequestAbstractInterfaceSync.
- Do I need another interface mapping with Source being PANRequestAbstractInterfaceAsync and Target being the RFC?
Link to these steps and app diagram:
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/PAN_Hotkey_Diagram.jpg
Thank you very much for your time.

Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

hi all!
i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
the BPM is like this:
Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
the IR is configured like this:
Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
Message Interfaces
mi_cxml_request_async_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
mi_xcml_response_async
mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_in
mi_rfc_response_async_abs
Message Mappings
mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
Interface Mappings
im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
and the ID is configured like this:
Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
Receiver Determination
two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
Interface Determination
two interface determinations:
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
Sender Agreement
VW
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
Receiver Agreement
|BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

hi all,
i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
in IR:
- interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
in ID:
- receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  sender service: VW
                                  interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  receiver: DES
                                  interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                     sender service: VW
                                     interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                     inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                     interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                               sender service: VW
                               receiver service: DES
                               receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
thank u very much folks

Sync/Async brdige error in BPM

Hi,
I am working on RFC-TO-Webservice scenario(Synchronous) and I am using the BPM in this scenario.
In BPM just I have used 2 steps.
Receive - Opened Sync/Async bridge
Send - Synchrouns step
Send - Cloase the Receive step
Send - Asynchrous send step (to send the response to the file...).
When I sent my RFC message from R/3 I am getting following error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I am using PI 7.0 SP13 is why I am not able to receive the Sync message in BPM...I have created the abstract interface based on RFC...getting the first message itself Timeout error.
I am trying to use Sync/Asnc bridge in BPM. First message itself PL_TIMEOUT error..bpm is not able to receive my rfc request...
I need help on this...do I need to do any settings in WEBAS level..I did Timeout setting in SXMB_ADM.
Regards,
Venu.

hi,
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
check this blog..and same thing I did in my scenario
my scenario is RFC-TO-Webservice.
Sync/Async bridge can't we use like this ...Receiver step(open sync/async)-> Send(Synchronous)-Send(Close sync bridge)....that way can't we use ...
I am not able to receive the RFC request itself inside my BPM first step...getting the Timeout error.
But when I use the RECEIVE STEP with Asynchronous mode..I am able to receive the message inside my bpm.Incase of Synchronous I am not able to receive the message..
I am working PI 7.0 and SP13..did any body worked this version...
Thanks,
venu.

Correlation issue in JMS adapter - SYNC/ASYNC scenario without BPM

Hi,
I am working on a SYNC/ASYNC scenario with JMS adapter without using BPM. My scenario is SOAP<>PI>JMS. I configured the interface as below:
1. SOAP Sender channel
2. JMS Receiver Channel writing to Queue A.
 Module used: a. RequestOneWayBean
 b. WaitResponseBean
 Correlation Settings:
 a. Set JMS Correlation ID to "XI Message ID"
 b. Store JMS CorrelationID of request (Checked)
 c. Set JMS Property to "JMS Correlation Id"
 d. Value = "XI MEssage ID"
3. JMS Sender channel reading from queue B ( I am exporting the message from queue A and importing into queue B)
 Module used: a. NotifyResponseBean
 Correlation Settings:
 a. Set XI MEssage Id to "GUID"
 b. Set XI Conversation ID to "Stored JMS COrrelationID of Request"
I can see the cid in the message from queue A. But I observed thhat the header format of the message in Queue A is "MQSTR".
ISSUE:
1. While writing the message to queue A, below adapter log details(part b) concerned me:
 a. Message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6' successfully processed by channel
 b. Could not create acknowledgements for message '8747a7c2-2b06-11df-8055-005056a70ed6'
I am not sure why I am receiving the message that " could not create acknowledgements"
2. While reading the message from the sender channel,I consistently get the error message as below:
 a. XI message ID corresponding to JMS message with ID 'ID:414d51205341504449442e514d202020c67b954b20005602'
 will be created as a new GUID with value '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'
 b. Error while processing message '21bca916-424f-41f6-3347-c71090392b58'; detailed error description:
 com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
 found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
Below are the blogs which I have already gone through:
1. JMS Synchronous Scenario without BPM - Correlation Settings and Transactional JMS Session
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/b028f6f6-7da5-2a10-19bd-cf322cf5ae7b
2. Note: 1086303
3. Sync / Async Bridge without BPM
In the note, they mentioned something about header being "MQRFH2". BUt in our case, the header is "MSSTR". Not sure whether it makes any difference.
Please help.
Edited by: GP on Mar 9, 2010 4:24 AM

Hi,
detailed error description:
com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.api.channel.filter.MessageFilterException: found no correlation ID: RecoverableException:
found no correlation ID at com.sap.aii.adapter.jms.core.channel.filter.SendToModuleProcessorFilter.filter(SendToModuleProcessorFilter.java:105) ...
This error would generally arose when there are multiple messages, got stuck in the outbound queue. Try to stop both the sender and receiver JMS comunication channels and clear both the inbound and outbound queues.
Once all the messages in the queue are cleraed, try posting the message again.
Regards,
Swetha.

BPM Design using sync-async bridge

Hi Arpit,
Below mentioned is an overview of the process flow which we are trying to implement.
1. A synchronous interface takes in the request
2. After the mapping, a file is created
3. Another file adapter reads this file and sends a message back to the sync interface. This step is to make sure that the file is created
I'm using a sync-async bridge for this process, since file creation and reading processes are asynchronous and the request/response is synchronous.
Can somebody help me by telling how to design the BPM. How many send and receive steps are required etc?
Thanks,
Sandeep
 | Request | | | | | | | |
 |--------->| | | | | | |File |
HTTP| |Sync|--->|Mapping|--->|Async|--->|Adapter|
 |<---------|I/f |<- | | |I/f | |(write)|
 | Response | | | | | | | |_______|
 | |
 | |
 | ____|___
 || | | | | |
 -|Async |<--|File Adp|<---|Folder |
 | I/f | |(read) | |________|

Hi
>>I have to map the incoming xml from HTTP to another format before creating the file.
Ya then u can use the transform Step in between the
sync Recv ---> Transform ---> Send to File System
>>Once a file is read, that interface has to send an acknowledgement message telling the status.
Wht type of acknowledgement msg telling the status.
I think u can add another element in ur created file payload like Status: Created (ConstanT)
Then u can map the payload of the readed file with tis payload having Ststus init.Fo this u need a Transformation Step.
BTW i was searching some previous blogs and i got this and it is bit related to ur scenario.Go thru this
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi
Hope it helps.
Regards
Arpit Seth

BPM Sync/Async Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for