Bulk Export of Mailboxes With Exchange 2010

Hi
Part of our organization is separating and preparing a new organization. All the users are in a separate OU, we are looking for a way to automate the export all these users mailboxes.
Thanks in Advance
LMS

Thank You
Since our requirement is to export all users in a specific OU we use below PS
$ou = "OU=EU,DC=Mydomain,DC=LOCAL"
$EUUser = Get-ADUser -SearchBase $ou -Filter * -Properties * | Select-Object Name
$EUUser.name
Foreach($users in $EUUser.name)
$pst = $users+".pst"
New-MailboxExportRequest -Mailbox $users -FilePath
\\Share-folder\$pst
LMS

Similar Messages

Script Powershell In Place Hold Mailbox with Exchange 2010

Hello,
I have a script that allows me to make a InPlaceHold newly created mailboxes via Exchange 2010.
But every time I run, he released me an error message: See attached picture.
Here is the script in question:
#Initialize variables
$policyname = "In Place - Hold"
$members = Import-CSV "C:\migration\Script\New_User\New_User_List.csv" -delimiter ";"
$Result = "C:\migration\Script\New_User\New_User_Result.log"
$powerUser = "******"
$powerPass = "******"
$password = ConvertTo-SecureString $powerPass -AsPlainText -Force
$adminCredential = New-Object -TypeName System.Management.Automation.PSCredential -argumentlist $powerUser,$password
$Session = New-PSSession -ConfigurationName Microsoft.Exchange -ConnectionUri https://outlook.office365.com/powershell-liveid/ -Credential $adminCredential -Authentication Basic -AllowRedirection
Import-PSSession $Session
#Get current mailboxes in our mailbox search
$InPlaceHoldMailboxes = (Get-MailboxSearch $policyname).sourceMailboxes
#Add another user to the array, the line bellow can be a loop of more than one user.
foreach ( $member in $members)
if ($InPlaceHoldMailboxes -contains($member.name))
Write-Host $("User " + $member.name + " already present") -ForegroundColor:yellow
Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - WARNING, User " + $member.name + " already present in members") -Encoding UTF8 -append
else
$InPlaceHoldMailboxes += $member.upn
Write-Host $("User " + $member.name + " added") -ForegroundColor:green
Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - SUCCESS, User " + $member.name + " added to members") -Encoding UTF8 -append
#Add them to the MailboxSearch
Try
Set-MailboxSearch $policyname -SourceMailboxes $InPlaceHoldMailboxes -Force -ErrorAction 'Stop'
Write-Host $("SUCCESS, " + $policyname + " updated") -ForegroundColor:green
Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - SUCCESS, " + $policyname + " updated") -Encoding UTF8 -append
Catch
Write-Host $("ERROR, policie " + $policyname + " NOT updated") -ForegroundColor:red
Out-File -FilePath $Result -InputObject $("IN-PLACE HOLD - ERROR, " + $policyname + " NOT updated") -Encoding UTF8 -append
Write-Error $_.Exception.ToString() > $Result
Exit
#start the mailboxsearch
Start-MailboxSearch -Identity $policyname -Force
Remove-PSSession $Session
I use Powershell 4.0
Thank you for your help.

Please read the error message carefully as it tells you what is wrong. "You cannot update multiple mailboxes". You must do one at a time.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Export Mailbox from Exchange 2010 and Import to Exchange 2007

Hello,
I exported mailbox (1GB in size) from Exchange 2010 to *.pst file; I need to import it into
Exchange 2007 mailbox. Is it supported ?
The operation completed successfully (no errors) but no items were imported; is it due to unsupported backward compatibility or some other issue ?
Thank you,
Luca
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights. Whenever you see a helpful reply, click on [Vote As Help] and click on [Mark As Answer] if a post answers your question.

I also have the same issue. Exported mailboxes on Exchange 2010 SP3 latest updates using
New-MailboxExportRequest and then tried to import into mailbox on Exchange 2007 SP3 with latest updates. The 32-bit client machine used for the import has Outlook 2010 SP1 (SP2 and later updates causes a different error). I used Outlook 2010 because the E2K10
New-MailboxExportRequest documentation states that you have to use Outlook 2010 or later. The PST files created can be opened and imported via Outlook but not with the
Import-Mailbox cmdlet (with no error as stated in this thread). Other PSTs, not created from E2K10 export do import just fine. I also ran ScanPST.exe against the exported PST and then ran the import again and it worked, everything got imported. Interestingly
the test mailbox PST file I was using was 761 KB but after the ScanPST it was 1,257 KB - must be some difference in the PST format that the Import-Mailbox cmdlet can't deal with.
Does anyone have any other solutions or
workarounds to this. I've got over 900 mailboxes I need this for due to an
acquisition? Has anyone tried using Outlook 2013 on the machine used for doing
the Exchange 2007 imports or does Outlook 2013 also have the same issue as later versions of Outlook 2010 (Exchange Mailbox import failed with error code 2147221233)?

Exchange 2013 DLP with Exchange 2010 mailboxes

Ive got an Exchange 2007/2010 environment. I've been looking at Exchange 2013 and am interested in the DLP funtionality.
There are no plans to move mailboxes to Exchange 2013 but would it be possible to install an Exchange 2013 CAS/Mailbox server in my environment and route email through it to make use of the DLP ?
Current environment consists of Exchange 2010 DAG, Casarray and hub transport servers, and Exchange 2007 mailbox servers, CAS and hub transports. Mail to the internet is sent to a smarthost.
Thank you.

Hi Maria,
DLP Policies are actually a specific transport rule. Since the transport rules with Exchange 2010 didn’t provide such feature to monitor and check the e-mail
content, I am afraid, in theory, it’s not possible.
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Users with mailboxes on exchange 2010 cant proxy to OWA on exchange 2013

We are in the process of migrating from 2010 to 2013. Users with mailboxes on exchange 2010 can't proxy to the owa on Exchange 2013 - there is no error - just receiving a message "Still working on it"
alex serdyukov

Hi Alex,
As the above suggestion mentioned, you can try to upgrade the Exchange 2013 to CU8 and check if any helps:
Cumulative Update 8 for Exchange Server 2013
Best regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Niko Cheng
TechNet Community Support

Weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes - allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms

Hi,
we are facing weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes
it allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms.Sometime we are not getting acceptance or declined mail but and we could see our meetings has been booked at slot.
for e.g.
User A booked room1 with weekly recurrence for time 4pm to 5pm., and User B made his booking other day,without realizing that user A meeting is exists.
Neither of user A nor user B got declined/rejected emails.
please sahre guidelines if anyone known to this issue.
Note - Allow Conflict booking is disabled already :) but still have issue
Thanks,
NPratik

Hi,
Just add more in this issue, following testing is done.
referring results and conclusion, you will get better view on issue
====================
Test Case - 1
User OnCloud/O365 - Pratik Nimbalkar
Email ID - [email protected]
( same as UPN)
Room Booking Scenario - Book Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - Accepted
Room Booking Scenario for same slot- ReBook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - Declined
Conclusion = working fine
==================
Test Case - 2
User OnCloud/O365 - Testsm
Email ID - [email protected]
( different from UPN)
Room Booking Scenario - Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
Room Booking Scenario for same slot- Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results -No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
=========================
Conclusion = There is issue with booking room and not getting response while user is
@abc.my id.
======================
Note = for all other on premise users those are having @abc.co.in
and @abc.my it is working fine. Users are getting respective correct reply from room mailboxes.
This issue seems with only on cloud
@abc.my users

Moving Exchange 2003 mailboxes to Exchange 2010

Hello
I have a new domain with Exchange 2010 server. I plan to join users to this domain but would like to know the best plan in moving the existing Exchange 2003 mailboxes over. Can I just import the PST files into their new Exhaneg 2010 mailboxes or is there
a better easier solution?
Thank you

Hi,
You can export mailbox using ExMerge in Exchange 2003, but ExMerge only supports ANSI PST files which have a 2GB limit.
To migrate mailboxes across forests, Active Directory Migration Tool (ADMT) will be used.
Here is a blog which can help you to do cross forest migration from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010 for your reference.
Exchange 2010 Cross-Forest Migration Step by Step Guide – Part I
http://blogs.technet.com/b/meamcs/archive/2011/06/10/exchange-2010-cross-forest-migration-step-by-step-guide-part-i.aspx
Best regards,
Belinda
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

BB Torch 9810 direct access mailbox Microsoft Exchange 2010

Hi,
Wanna check whether in anyway my BB could direct access mailbox Microsoft Exchange 2010 without BES (private and/or Company). Thanks
BR

Hi eddiesonka,
"Why" is truly a difficult question for us end users to truly know the answer to. Typically, I shy away from those since, well, not being an insider, I can only have my own personal theories. But, this topic is one that I'm OK presenting my theories on.
The basic answer is that different is different. Non-BB devices do things in their way, BBs do them in their way. Consequently, we all have choice, which is a good thing in a free market society, I think!
Unlike other devices (e.g., ActiveSync), BBs do not technically have a full on-device email client. Other devices, with a full on-device client, conduct all device to email server activities directly. BBs use the carrier/RIM hosted BIS service as an intermediary between the BB and the email server. The main benefit is one of data plan consumption. With non-BBs, the full on device email client must check the server for new email on a periodic basis (yes, I know that some services have more PUSH, but many are still PULL), generating traffic over the carrier data network even when there is no new email on the server. With BBs, that "check for new email" is done by BIS, completely independent of the BB...so no traffic to the BB is generated unless BIS finds something on the server that needs to come to the BB. For folks on limited data plans and limited WiFi access, this can become important.
So, it is up to the consumer to completely research the different choices available to them...and make their selection according to their own unique set of requirements and desires. RIM is advancing BIS...with GMail and Yahoo, there now are some calendar and contact OTA synchronization capabilities that did not exist in the past. With luck, they will continue to develop BIS and enable more and more OTA functions to BIS-level customers -- while, of course, at the same time, preserving their dominance in the mobile security world! And remember, for enterprises, RIM has made BES-X totally free...
Hope that helps!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Can't move Exchange 2003 mailbox to Exchange 2010 Resource forest (Linked Mailbox)

Problem Description:
Can’t move Exchange 2003 mailbox to Exchange 2010 resource forest
Error message:
Failed to reconnect to Active Directory server SRVUMVMDC02.umfolozi.local. Make sure the server is available, and that you have used the correct credentials.
Source Environment Configuration:
Active Directory
FQDN: umfolozi.local
Domain name (pre-Windows 2000): UMFOLOZI
Domain Function Level: Windows Server 2003
Domain Controllers:
Hostname
OS
Operation Master
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1
Schema Master, Domain Naming, RID, PDC
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard SP1
Infrastructure
Exchange
Version: Microsoft Exchange 2003 Standard SP2 Build 7638.2
Server Information:
Hostname
OS
TUSKUMFMAIL.umfolozi.local
Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2
DNS Zones
Zone Name
Zone Type
Domain Controllers
umfolozi.local
Active Directory-Integrated (Primary)
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
peermont.com
Secondary
SRVPGVMDC01.peermont.com
SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com
Trusts
Domain Name
Trust Type
Transitive
Validated
peermont.com
Forest
Yes
Yes
Target Environment Configuration:
Active Directory
FQDN: peermont.com
Domain name (pre-Windows 2000): PG
Domain Functional Level: Windows Server 2008 R2
Domain Controllers:
Hostname
OS
Operation Master
SRVPGVMDC01.peermont.com
Windows Server 2008 R2 Std SP1
SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com
Windows Server 2008 R2 Std SP1
Domain naming, RID, PDC, Infrastructure, Schema Master
Exchange
Resource Exchange Forest
Server Information:
Hostname
OS
Role
Version
Client Access Array
SRVPGVMEXCH01.peermont.com
Windows Server 2012 Std
HUB, CAS
Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
exchange.peermont.com
SRVPGVMEXCH02.peermont.com
Windows Server 2012 Std
HUB, CAS
Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
exchange.peermont.com
Hostname
OS
Role
Version
Database Availibility Group
SRVPGVMEXCH03.peermont.com
Windows Server 2012 Std
MBX
Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
PeermontDAG
SRVPGVMEXCH04.peermont.com
Windows Server 2012 Std
MBX
Version 14.3 (Build 123.4)
PeermontDAG
DNS Zones
Zone Name
Zone Type
Domain Controllers
peermont.com
Active Directory-Integrated (Primary)
SRVPGVMDC01.peermont.com
SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com
umfolozi.local
Secondary
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
Trusts
Domain Name
Trust Type
Transitive
Validated
umfolozi.local
Forest
Yes
Yes
Migration Process
Task
Description
Successful/Error
1
SYNC AD Domain account from source forest (umfolozi.local) to target forest (peermont.com) using BinaryTree SMART Directory Sync (ADMT can be used as alternative)
Successful
2
Create mailed enabled user
Successful
3
Run Prepare-MoveRepuest with –OverWriteLocalObject
Command Example:
.\Prepare-MoveRequest.ps1 -Identity [email protected] -RemoteForestDomainController SRVUMVMDC01.umfolozi.local
-RemoteForestCredential $RemoteCredentials -UseLocalObject -LocalForestDomainController SRVPGVMDC01.peermont.com -LocalForestCredential $LocalCredentials -OverWriteLocalObject
Successful
4
Submit mailbox request
Command Example:
New-MoveRequest -Identity "0fa7d17e-3637-4708-a51b-f14eaae17968" -BadItemLimit "50" -TargetDeliveryDomain
"internal.peermont.com" -TargetDatabase "{c5d6ea95-07b3-4a52-9868-e41e808a76fe}" -RemoteCredential (Get-Credential "umfolozi\svcmigration") -RemoteGlobalCatalog "SRVUMVMDC02.umfolozi.local" -RemoteLegacy:$True
Error
All the standard migration task works as expected until the mailbox migration move request is submitted. See move request verbose detail below:
[PS] C:\Windows\system32>New-MoveRequest -Identity "0fa7d17e-3637-4708-a51b-f14eaae17968" -BadItemLimit "50" -TargetDeli
veryDomain "internal.peermont.com" -TargetDatabase "{c5d6ea95-07b3-4a52-9868-e41e808a76fe}" -RemoteCredential (Get-Crede
ntial "umfolozi\svcmigration") -RemoteGlobalCatalog "SRVUMVMDC02.umfolozi.local" -RemoteLegacy:$True -Verbose
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.346 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Active Directory session settings for 'New-MoveRequest' are: View Entire
Forest: 'False', Default Scope: 'peermont.com', Configuration Domain Controller: 'SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com', Preferred
Global Catalog: 'SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com', Preferred Domain Controllers: '{ SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com }'
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.362 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Runspace context: Executing user: peermont.com/Admin/Users/Admin
Accounts/Information Technology/SoarSoft/Johann Van Schalkwyk, Executing user organization: , Current organization: ,
RBAC-enabled: Enabled.
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.362 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Beginning processing &
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.362 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Instantiating handler with index 0 for cmdlet extension agent "Admin
Audit Log Agent".
WARNING: When an item can't be read from the source database or it can't be written to the destination database, it
will be considered corrupted. By specifying a non-zero BadItemLimit, you are requesting that Exchange not copy such
items to the destination mailbox. At move completion, these corrupted items won't be available in the destination
mailbox.
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.362 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Searching objects "{c5d6ea95-07b3-4a52-9868-e41e808a76fe}" of type
"MailboxDatabase" under the root "$null".
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.362 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Previous operation run on domain controller 'SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com'.
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.393 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Current ScopeSet is: { Recipient Read Scope: {{, }}, Recipient Write
Scopes: {{, }}, Configuration Read Scope: {{, }}, Configuration Write Scope(s): {{, }, }, Exclusive Recipient Scope(s):
{}, Exclusive Configuration Scope(s): {} }
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.393 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Searching objects "0fa7d17e-3637-4708-a51b-f14eaae17968" of type "ADUser"
under the root "$null".
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.471 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Previous operation run on domain controller 'SRVPGVMDC02.peermont.com'.
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.471 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Processing object "$null".
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.487 GMT] New-MoveRequest : [DEBUG] No RequestJob messages found.
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.487 GMT] New-MoveRequest : [DEBUG] MDB c5d6ea95-07b3-4a52-9868-e41e808a76fe found to belong to Site:
peermont.com/Configuration/Sites/Peermont
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.487 GMT] New-MoveRequest : [DEBUG] MRSClient: attempting to connect to 'SRVPGVMEXCH02.peermont.com'
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.627 GMT] New-MoveRequest : [DEBUG] MRSClient: connected to 'SRVPGVMEXCH02.peermont.com', version
14.3.178.0 caps:07
VERBOSE: [11:34:27.627 GMT] New-MoveRequest : [DEBUG] Loading source mailbox info
VERBOSE: [11:34:28.844 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Failed to reconnect to Active Directory server
SRVUMVMDC02.umfolozi.local. Make sure the server is available, and that you have used the correct credentials. --> A
local error occurred.
VERBOSE: [11:34:28.844 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Admin Audit Log: Entered Handler:OnComplete.
Failed to reconnect to Active Directory server SRVUMVMDC02.umfolozi.local. Make sure the server is available, and that
you have used the correct credentials.
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (0:Int32) [New-MoveRequest], RemoteTransientException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : F48FD74B,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.NewMoveRequest
+ PSComputerName : srvpgvmexch02.peermont.com
VERBOSE: [11:34:28.859 GMT] New-MoveRequest : Ending processing &
Troubleshooting Performed
1. When submitting mailbox move request tried the following credential inputs:
1.1. DOMAIN\Username
1.2. FQDN\Username
1.3. userPrincipalName
2. Confirmed domain trust between source and target domain is in place and validated.
3. Confirmed name resolution in source and target domain is functioning as expected.
4. Confirmed network connectivity between source and target domain controllers as well as source and target exchange servers.
5. Tried to create new Linked Mailbox to account in source forest, can’t select Global Catologue via the wizard;
Tried to specify the credentials for the account forest and got the following error when tried to select Global Catalog from wizard:

The error talk about the credential. Did you check the credential
Did you tried this command?
New-MoveRequest -Identity "Distinguished name of User in Target Forest" -RemoteLegacy -TargetDatabase "E2K10 Mailbox Database Name" -RemoteGlobalCatalog "FQDN of Source DC" -RemoteCredential $Remote -TargetDeliveryDomain "Target
domain name"
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2010/08/10/3410619.aspx
Cheers,
Gulab Prasad
Technology Consultant
Blog:
http://www.exchangeranger.com    Twitter:
  LinkedIn:
   Check out CodeTwo’s tools for Exchange admins
Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

Limitations of SharePoint 2013 integration with Exchange 2010?

Customer using SharePoint 2013 and looking at whether its possible to integrate this with Exchange 2010 and which features would be available / limitations. Looking for a matrix similar to those found in the Good, Better, Best documents available for previous
versions. Nothing available on Recently Published content for SharePoint 2013 yet http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262043.aspx

I haven't seen a specific list, but the three features I've run into that only work with Exchange 2013 are eDiscovery in Exchange, Automatic Task Synchronization with Outlook and the Site Mailbox feature. There is a Legacy Task Synchronization mode
available that will work with Exchange 2010 if you turn off the Farm level feature controlling Exchange 2013 task synchronization. It lets users manually sync specific task lists with Outlook. But there is no task aggregation. I found this
whitepaper helpful for exploring the new features and how to turn them off when using Exchange 2010.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38799
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Beware of Linked Mailbox status - Moving Unity_server mailboxes to Exchange 2010

Hi all -
Here is a problem I encountered that I want to pass along to you:
When partnering Unity to Exchange 2010, the Unity_servername, USBMS_servername, EAdmin, and unitymsgstoresvc inboxes are moved from the old Exchange to the new 2010 server. Using the Exchange Management Console, the users should show up as User Mailboxes, not Linked Mailbox. A Linked mailbox in Exchange 2010 is an external account, i.e. an account in another forest. If this occurs for the Unity_servername mailbox, external caller voice messages remain in UMR (UnityMTA) and you will see many application event log errors. In EMC you will observe the account mailboxes show in Disconnected status.
If this happens to you, here is the fix:
Disable the Account from EMC in Exchange 2010. Note you will get a prompt that the Exchange properties are being removed but the email inbox is NOT deleted.
Re-enable the account from ADUC.
In EMC, go to Disconnected Mailboxes, select the Unity mailbox and select Connect. In the Connect wizard, re-associate with the existing account. Re-enter the user alias and complete the wizard.
Restart AvUMRSynchSvr service on Unity.
Hope this helps someone in the future!
Sincerely, Ginger

Thanks Brad :-) I forgot to mention I discovered a number of Internet hits that say this can happen with Move Mailbox. Here's the link I used to begin researching the problem (hint: go all the way to the bottom of the web page - http://www.experts-exchange.com/Software/Server_Software/Email_Servers/Exchange/Q_26308671.html). Got to give kudo's to this most excellent Exchange resource - has helped me a bunch over the years!

Mailbox Permissions Exchange 2010 forcing mailbox on outlook profile.

Hi,
We currently have a user that uses outlook 2010, along with exchange 2010. He currently uses two mail profiles on his outlook.
Profile 1 & Profile 2.
Profile 1 consists of his primary inbox. Profile 2 consists of a few shared mailboxes, along with 3 staff members.
When we add full permissions to the user to another 3 mailboxes 2010 makes this automatically appear for the user, casuing it to show on profile 1. Is there a way to stop this auto mapping and only add them to the second mailbox?
Thanks

Hi,
We can use the “-Automapping” switch in the following command:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh529943(v=exchg.141).aspx
Thanks,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Primary mailbox (on Exchange 2010) and Personal Archive (on Exchange 2013), possible?

Current environment is Exchange 2010 SP3 RU5 supporting 4,000 Users. Client estate is Outlook 2010 SP1 going on SP2.
We're pulling our Archiving solution away from 3rd party and back into Exchange. Implementing a new set of Exchange 2010 Servers (old DAG or in a new Archive DAG) would be easy. But is there Exchange 2013 stepping stone potential?
Can the Archive DAG / Archive mailboxes be on 2013? i.e. for any given User, leave their primary mailbox on Exchange 2010 and create new Archive mailbox on 2013.
I want to avoid implementing 2010 Archive Servers and then go 2013 Archive 6 months or a year later.
This article suggests 'no':
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/dd979800(v=exchg.150).aspx
"Locating a user’s mailbox and archive on different versions of Exchange Server is not supported."
I've found little info but the odd statement here / there.
Is this the latest position? Is it that cut & dry? Anyone tried it? Why won't it work (or will it but it's not supported)?
Thanks!

<I had a response from MS>
Below is a summary of the case for your records:
Symptom:
=============
Is it possible to implement a 2013 environment to host the Archive mailboxes? i.e. for any given User, their primary mailbox is on Exchange 2010 and their Archive
mailbox is on 2013.
Resolution:
=============
It’s not supported to have a user’s primary mailbox reside on an older Exchange version than the user’s archive. If the user’s primary mailbox is still on Exchange
2010, you must move it to Exchange 2013 before or at the same time when you move the archive to Exchange 2013.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj651146(v=exchg.150).aspx
as per the repro in our lab, having the archive mailbox in higher version of exchange would fail with the error above
<the scenario isn't completely relevant, looks like he's trying to put the Primary on 2013 and not the Archive, no matter, we've established there are problems, question is whether they are looking into this area / to patch, they go on...>
At this point in time we don’t have a conformation from the product team, if the above would change in the future exchange versions.
<MS did say on the call that they were not looking at fixing it, naturally this isn't a "never", as per previous statement - they can't commit 100% to the future, but they've provided me the answer - they are not currently looking at resolving/providing
this as a migration scenario, end.>

Uploading photo from Lync client with Exchange 2010

We are using Lync 2013 standard edition with Exchange 2010 in our environment.
In the client, if we go to Tools -> Options -> My Picture, the option to "Edit or Remove Picture" is greyed out.
I understand this is only available if we're on Exchange 2013, but someone somewhere must have figured out a workaround for this? Anyone know a reg-hack or 3rd party tool that would enable this feature?
I realize there is a method to turn back on the "Show a picture from a website" via powershell. I have already done this in our environment. However it is quite unrealistic to expect general populace to know how to resize a picture to less than
30kb (?!) and upload it "somewhere" on the web. Understandably this would be a nightmare for Help Desk having to help people resize their photos and find somewhere to upload it to.
Any help/ideas would be appreciated!

You could centrally upload profile photos for your users into the AD's thumbnailPhoto attribute using...
powershell:
http://blogs.technet.com/upload-picture
3rd party software:
http://www.codetwo.com/freeware/active-directory-photos/
http://www.cjwdev.co.uk/Software/ADPhotoEdit/Info.html
Lync client side upload into Exchange 2010 will not be possible as Exchange 2013 introduced HD photo and storing photos in the mailbox. Take a look at: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj688150.aspx
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

Z10 with Exchange 2010 Activesync missing incoming messages

Z10 with Exchange 2010 Activesync won't download all messages, missing messages include messages sent to internal Exchange distribution groups and bulk email (I could live with this one, lol) Activesync works fine on iOS and android devices (100+ devices in my organization with no issues). Tried enabling secure IMAP on the exchange server, and with this config the messages are delivered, but the body of the same messages missing with the activesync setup have a [No body found] in the message body and are otherwise blank. Tried running the EAVT tool and it returns "Nothing was found for provided credentials" . My personal Gmail account works fine on the phone, tried loading the 10.1 Blackberry OS and had the same problem. Tried setting up the account multiple times, used both autodiscover and manual setup to no avail. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance for your help!

Hey cyberayk,
Welcome to the BlackBerry® Support Community Forums.
Do these email messages get redirected to a different folder on the Exchange Server? If yes, On the BlackBerry smartphone go to Settings > Accounts> Select the account> Edit Folder Settings, are these folders selected?
Thanks.
-HB
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Bulk Export of Mailboxes With Exchange 2010

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for