CALCULATION OF OCTROI IN TAX INJ

Dear Guru,
In the pricing procedure We are following percentage base for the calculation of octroi.The octroi is calculated on the base value excise dutysales tax
I give the basic price and the tax code in the PO and the octroi should be directly calculated on the basic price and the taxes.
1) Our Taxation procedure is TAXINJ
2) In pricing schema We have given the 361 as ALT CBV to octroi condition (JOCM), to calculate the octroi percentage on Octroi Base value that is basic Price excise dutysales tax.
3) As per requirement 361, system should fetch the octroi base value from taxation procedure to pricing schema. But system is transfering some other value than the real octroi base value.
3) Given percentage is calculated over the fetched value. So Octroi amount calculated is wrong.
Please guide us is there any settings are missed out.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Jitendra,
Thanks for your wonderful co-operation. The issue is almost solved. One lat wuery-
We are at present using 20 tax conditions in our tax procedure. But in a single PO we are using only 3 or 4 conditions out of them How can I identify in my program that which tax conditions are actually used in the current printable PO????
I can use table A363 for searching condition records only after identifying the relevent condition type used in a PO otherwise I have to search for all 20 condition types. Please note we are using TAXINN ( condition based) tax procedure.
I am eagerly awaiting for your suggestion. Thanks again,
Priti

Similar Messages

Domestic purchase-octroi/entry tax

Hi,
Octori calculation wrong:
In Domestic purchase, when i calculate the octroi intially in Pricing procedure it is giving wrong calculation.
1.how should bring the Taxes values ( i.e excis eduty+VAT/CST etc) into pricing.
2.in Ammendment of PO, i am giving manually the correct value of octroi.
if PO have multiple line item, what sahll i do?
please let me know
my user requirement:
Base price- 800
Misc charges- (2.5%)- 20
P&F( 2%)- 16
Subtotal 1= 836
Local Freight (2%)- 16.72
subtotal2= 852.72
Excis eduty(fromTAXINN procedure10.3%)- 87.83
subtotal 3= 940.55
VAT/CST - (3% from TAXINN)-28.22
subtotal 4= 968.77
octroi/entry tax - 3% in Pricing procedure)- 29.06
Total gross price= 997.83
i maintained JOCT condition type for Octroi in pricing.
upto subtotal4 values are coming perfect.
when i enter octroi 3%, system is calculating on Subtotal2 i.e 852.72. but it's wrong value.
when i ammned the PO, i am giving manually 29.06 for octroi for each line item.

Hi
Its purely an calculation schema problem. For the octroi line item u need to tell the syetm from which step the value it want to caluculate.
Vijay

Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A

Hi guys,
While creatig a sales order I am getting the following error:
" Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A"
Kindly suggest corrective measures.
Bst regards,
Ashok

Dear ashok
please check for the Tax code assignment which is determined in UTXJ condition.
for the sales order.
and check that tax code is defined as output TAX in FTXP.
for country IN and Tax procedure TAXINJ.
Thanks & regards

Fee calculation in combination with tax

Hello,
I have a question i hope someone can help me with. I want to run the fee calculation with and without tax.
Fox example with the following situation
Condition record A: Tuit fee -> No tax
Condition record B: Meals -> tax of 6%
I calculate both condition records in the same fee calculation procedure.
If i add tax to the contract account but then i cannot controle which condition record gets tax and which one doesn't. So i moved one level down to the contract object. Here i didn't find a field to add tax.
Does anyone have an idea how to fix this?
Thanks a lot!
Lukas Molenaar

Hi Lukas,
If an institution has to charge tax for some service then SAP expects that it would also impact areas other than student fees. Therefore, the actual tax definition is done in global settings. Certainly, if only some fees, e.g. meals, have taxes then you need to set that up as a contract object type. The condition records don't come into play at all.
It should be possible to deal with your requirement in standard. I will send you a document which will explain in more detail (and with screenshots).
Hopefully, this helps you further.
Rob (and thanks Marlies!)

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Calculation of Depreciation for Tax for India

Hi
In India, there is a requirement that the Depreciation for Income Tax should be calculated based on the date of Acquisition. If an asset has been acquired before or on completion of 180 days of a Financial Year, than the calculation of Depreciation is allowed for full year. If the asset has been acquired after 180 days , depreciation is allowed only for 180 days. Hence for an asset acquired on 25/09/2009, system should allow calculation of depreciation from 01/04/2009, assuming that the fiscal year starts from 01/04/2009 and ends on 31/03/2009. However, if the asset is acquired on 07/10/2009, the system should allow depreciation from 01/10/2009. Sap has delivered standard depreciation keys for the same in reference chart of depreciation for India 0IN.
But if the asset has been acquired on 01/10/2009, still the asset has to be depreciated from 01/04/2009, since the asset has been acquired for less than 180 days into the fiscal year. The system is working fine for asset capitalized on 25/09/2009 and 07/10/2009. But we are not able to map the same if asset is capitalized on 01/10/2009 and 02/10/2009. For these two dates, the depreciation should start from 01/04/2009.
I have checked the period control setting and calender assignments and everything seems to be in place. How can we tackle the issue?
Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

Hi
The same has been resolved.I Created a new assignment in Period Control IT for my fiscal year variant. For month 10, i added a new line item with no of days as 2 in addition to no of days as 31 for month 10.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

Calculation of Fringe Benefit Tax in SAP

Dear all,
I want information about the fringe benefit tax (FBT). How can we configure it in SAP. Is there any standards available? any information on FBT is highly appreciable.
Thanks,

Dear Madhusudhan,
Maintain separate GL for FBT related acounts.
Maintain key word in GL Master.
So only those GLs will be selected for FBT calculation.
Thereafter you can execute reports like F.01 based on keywords to identify values in such accounts. Just apply the rates as per FBT rules and make a provision.
Assign points if useful

Calculation of With Holding Tax amount

Hi,
We are using the WHT which has the Minimum amount limit as 700 at the Paying document,
The issue is
there is a Paying document which clears 4 MM Invoices (Documents are coming from MIRO)
2 MM Invoice with less than 700 amount and other 2 MM Invoice with more than 700 amount,
the system is calculating the WHT for only 2 documents which are having amount less that 700 while the payment document is generated.
Can any one please suggest whether the WHT should be calculated for only 2 which have amount more than 700
OR it will get deducted for all the 4 MM as the Total of the paying document is more that 700.
Note : The Accumlation type in the WHT is No accumlation.
Looking for a positive riposte.
Thanks
Manish

It has to calculate for 2 docs more than 700 if you select no accumulation & "Minimum Check" Min base amount check at doc invoice level

Calculation of Purchase Order TAX in Smart Form

Hi All !
I am facing problem in purchase Order, how to calculate the value of tax in Purchase order .
in KONV Table, I am getting the value of condition type which r maintained on pricing procedure but, we r not getting the condition type for particular TAX code.
How we can calculate the tax. or
Is there any problem in VOFM/formulas/condition value.
please suggest me.
Thanks & Regards
Priti

Hi Jitendra,
Thanks for your wonderful co-operation. The issue is almost solved. One lat wuery-
We are at present using 20 tax conditions in our tax procedure. But in a single PO we are using only 3 or 4 conditions out of them How can I identify in my program that which tax conditions are actually used in the current printable PO????
I can use table A363 for searching condition records only after identifying the relevent condition type used in a PO otherwise I have to search for all 20 condition types. Please note we are using TAXINN ( condition based) tax procedure.
I am eagerly awaiting for your suggestion. Thanks again,
Priti

Calculation of Housing Allowance Tax Relief

Dear gurus, Please help me on this.
The limit for housing allowance for tax relief is 150,000curr p.a. Some employees annual housing allowance is not up to 150,000curr and should be limited to that amount when running payroll. They have same employee group and subgroup as those who are eligible for the 150,000curr which has been configured in the payroll schema.
What do I do to enable the system calculate differently for these employees whose housing allowance is not up to 150,000curr p.a.
Thanks

Issue resolved

Tax inj

Hi Friends
Could you please help me in this.
What is the difference between TAXINN and TAXINJ.
If I want to configure TAXINJ in my client system, How Can I go ahead,
Please help me on this .
BR
Rahul

hi
TaxINJ was the procedure which was used earlier to 4.7. This was based on the formula based approach even though the condition technique was introduced in the 4.6C version I think.
The condition based approach until ecc 5.0 did not work perfectly. Thats the reason why it was not popular. Also there was some inconsistency in the way the system determined the tax vaues. In the TAXINJ based on the formula based approach the records for excise and tax was maintianed though tax codes in finance transaction FTXP. This had little flexibility in that the number of combinations for excise and ST/CST was very large and a large number of tax codes need to be maintianed which was cumbersome. It was also very complex and should you wish to change the basis for the values it was difficult.It was totally a tax code based approach.
But it worked O.K though on the export side there are still a lot of things not yet ironed out by SAP even now.
When it came to condition technique it was a refreshing change. It was simple bold and flexible in that you could maintain your your condition using a variety of criteria i.e sales org, country, plant, chapter id , material .....
This offered the company a great flexibility. But the condition value still references to the tax code here which is a dummy tax condition which is required for maintian condition values. each of this condition values is unique unlike the previous where all the taxes are maintained in a single code.
If you want to change the tax rate basis its pretty simple. Just use a different access.
Thats the basic difference. There are other differences too but this is the essential.
Re: TAXINN & TAXINJ
Re: Differences between TAXINN & TAXINJ
regards
kunal

FB60 Output Tax calculations (CST, VAT, Service Tax)

HI,
Tax rates are maintained in Condition types in SD module.
For FI transaction we need tax codes in FI. In FTXP when I am giving tax rate system not saving the rates.
Please let me know, how the tax codes are created in FI (when tax rates are maintained in SD conditions types).
Thanks
Partha

I did as below:
1. In FTXP i given percentage for respective tax codes.
2. OB40 I assigned GL accounts for respective tax codes (diff. accts for diff tax code, ie. CST, VAT, Service Tax)
But I used here MWS (which is differ to the SD account key)
Accounts are updating properly.
Can you tell me, is there any problem, or is it right or wrong?
Thanks
Partha

Scripting calculations for subtotal and taxes = grandtotal

I have a work form that lists cost of work preformed. 4 amount fields, a subtotal field, tax, and grand total. I am having an issue collaborating the subtotal, taxes and grandtotal. I have googled everywhere just for basic FormCalc help but to no avail. Any help you can give me will be very much appreciated.
this is the script I foolishly 'thought' would work.
Subtotal - Sum(AMOUNT, AMOUNT, AMOUNT, AMOUNT)
Tax - Sum(TOTAL * .0825)
Grandtotal - SUM(TOTAL, TAX)
I have ran the syntax check on all fields no errors, but I get some extremely weird output when integers are place in the amount fields.
layout --------------
amount
amount
amount
amount
subtotal
taxes
grand total
they are all numeric fields (i don't know if all this is relevant but I'm trying to make this as easy as possible for you to troubleshoot)
thanks in advance
skyler

Sklyer,
The attached is a sample using FormCalc for what you are trying to achieve. In the future you should post requests in the LiveCycle Designer ES forum if the request does not include Barcoded Forms ES. The Designer forum is monitored more closely.
Steve

Whether Tax INJ can be Material specific

Hi Experts,
My client is having 2 plants and they are using taxinj procedure insted of taxinn, and they want tax condition types to be material specific... Whether it is possible in taxinj. coz rates are maintained according to tax code in FTXP, no where else and FTXP is not material specific.. i think that it cant be done unless we use TAXINN.
correct me if i am wrong,
please suggest.

For excise to be applied you can make settings specific to material...you can maintain respective data in J1ID
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

CALCULATION OF OCTROI IN TAX INJ

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for