Calculation of Housing Allowance Tax Relief

Dear gurus, Please help me on this.
The limit for housing allowance for tax relief is 150,000curr p.a. Some employees annual housing allowance is not up to 150,000curr and should be limited to that amount when running payroll. They have same employee group and subgroup as those who are eligible for the 150,000curr which has been configured in the payroll schema.
What do I do to enable the system calculate differently for these employees whose housing allowance is not up to 150,000curr p.a.
Thanks

Issue resolved

Similar Messages

Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A

Hi guys,
While creatig a sales order I am getting the following error:
" Calculation procedure TAXINJ and tax key E1 not in table T007A"
Kindly suggest corrective measures.
Bst regards,
Ashok

Dear ashok
please check for the Tax code assignment which is determined in UTXJ condition.
for the sales order.
and check that tax code is defined as output TAX in FTXP.
for country IN and Tax procedure TAXINJ.
Thanks & regards

Fee calculation in combination with tax

Hello,
I have a question i hope someone can help me with. I want to run the fee calculation with and without tax.
Fox example with the following situation
Condition record A: Tuit fee -> No tax
Condition record B: Meals -> tax of 6%
I calculate both condition records in the same fee calculation procedure.
If i add tax to the contract account but then i cannot controle which condition record gets tax and which one doesn't. So i moved one level down to the contract object. Here i didn't find a field to add tax.
Does anyone have an idea how to fix this?
Thanks a lot!
Lukas Molenaar

Hi Lukas,
If an institution has to charge tax for some service then SAP expects that it would also impact areas other than student fees. Therefore, the actual tax definition is done in global settings. Certainly, if only some fees, e.g. meals, have taxes then you need to set that up as a contract object type. The condition records don't come into play at all.
It should be possible to deal with your requirement in standard. I will send you a document which will explain in more detail (and with screenshots).
Hopefully, this helps you further.
Rob (and thanks Marlies!)

Net Pay calculation is wrong, allowance wage type is not getting added to net amount..

Hi Dears,
We are doing payroll configurations for one of our client in india, Regarding our requirement ,we jus tried in test system, we have written a pcr rule stating 01st feb 2015, new allowance need to paid to employees belonging to L&T1 pa and LT ESG.. Allowance will be percent based on gross pay..allowance percentage differs according to the ESG..
Before writing the PCR, Allowance percentage has been maintained in T511K.. And have configured as payroll constant ZTST 1 should be calculated with a value 2%.
i have created a new wage type 9021 allowance wage type and this wage type amount should be automatically generated in payslip based on the pcr i have written while running payroll for an employee.
EARNINGS                                                       DEDUCTIONS
l&t basic pay 9000             54838.71                    INCOME TAX
l&t conveyance 9100            2741.94                   12394.00
l&t hra           9200               4387.10
l&t allownace 9021                1239.36
TOTAL Gross amount          63,207.11              Take Home pay (net pay) 49,573.75
But the actual net amount should be 50,813.11..Based on the allowance wagetype i have created which is automatically generting using the pcr i have written , is getting calculated in the gross amount..
but not getting added in net amount .so please help me out guys on how to solve this issue???
Regards,
Surya Prabha

Hi Remi,
Thanks for your kind reply, yes these values are taken from the remuration statement of a particular pernr whom am running the payroll..
i have checked the processing classs and i have maintained 5 and 70 which add this new allowance amount to my net amount. now the net amount is proper.
EARNINGS                                                       DEDUCTIONS                   perks/other income/exemptions
l&t basic pay 9000             54838.71                NCOME TAX                       l&t leave encashment    1239.36
l&t conveyance 9100         2741.94                   12416.00
l&t hra           9200               4387.10
TOTAL Gross amount          61,967.75             Take Home pay (net pay) 50 791.11
Regards,
Surya Prabha

A/R down payment invoice not allowing tax

Hi Experts,
We use SAP Business One 2007A PL-08. While posting A/R down payment with percentage on DPM (For example 50%), the system is not calculating GST on it though we put the GST tax code in the invoice.
Any idea how this can be resolved?
Is there a workaround for this?
Thank you,

Thanks Gordon. As a workaround, we created a dummy item number for the GST to be input into the A/R Down payment invoice. The problem here is that when we add a line item for the GST using this item number, the G/L account is defaulting to customer deposits account and its now allowing us to change the G/L account to the relevant GST G/L. Is there a way we can change the G/L?
Please let me know!!
Thanks

Calculation of Depreciation for Tax for India

Hi
In India, there is a requirement that the Depreciation for Income Tax should be calculated based on the date of Acquisition. If an asset has been acquired before or on completion of 180 days of a Financial Year, than the calculation of Depreciation is allowed for full year. If the asset has been acquired after 180 days , depreciation is allowed only for 180 days. Hence for an asset acquired on 25/09/2009, system should allow calculation of depreciation from 01/04/2009, assuming that the fiscal year starts from 01/04/2009 and ends on 31/03/2009. However, if the asset is acquired on 07/10/2009, the system should allow depreciation from 01/10/2009. Sap has delivered standard depreciation keys for the same in reference chart of depreciation for India 0IN.
But if the asset has been acquired on 01/10/2009, still the asset has to be depreciated from 01/04/2009, since the asset has been acquired for less than 180 days into the fiscal year. The system is working fine for asset capitalized on 25/09/2009 and 07/10/2009. But we are not able to map the same if asset is capitalized on 01/10/2009 and 02/10/2009. For these two dates, the depreciation should start from 01/04/2009.
I have checked the period control setting and calender assignments and everything seems to be in place. How can we tackle the issue?
Regards
Sanil K Bhandari

Hi
The same has been resolved.I Created a new assignment in Period Control IT for my fiscal year variant. For month 10, i added a new line item with no of days as 2 in addition to no of days as 31 for month 10.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

AP Tax Calculation issue with SINGLE TAX vs TAX GROUP

Hi Gurus,
i need your help on below, please advise!!
i have to calculate ap VAT tax on AP invoice,
(Rounding = nearest, precession=2, tax calcualtion= Include tax)
if i calculate 5% is the tax rate, then the tax amount is 0.47cents,this is in case of single tax calculation.
here my requirement was i need calculate 2 Taxes(TAX A AND TAX B (Rates are 5 AND 5%)
EG:
Invoce Base amount = 10 dollars
in case of single tax = 5/105 * 10 = 0.4761 cents(this is 48cents in apps with rouning nearest and precession 2)
tax mode = Include tax
In case of tax group = Tax A and Tax B = 5 + 5 = 10%, when i calculate this in apps its showing 45cents and 45 cents as tax A and B
why this tax caluclation is different with single tax and tax group.
tax code actual amount tax amount remaining amount
single tax 10 0.4761 10 - 0.48cents = 9.52 cents
tax group 10 45+45=90 cents 9.10 cents
Please Help !!!
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Vineeth,
This is Kathy from BSI Support. I wanted to make sure that you understood that the TF80 Like Reciprocal flag was made available in TF90 for testing purposes only. This was meant as a tool for customers to be able to compare their TF90 results to their TF80 output, to insure a successful upgrade. This funcitonality, however, was never intended to be utilized going forward. There have been significant changes implemented in BSI TaxFactory 9.0 regarding multi-state withholding (also known as reciprocity). There is information available on our website that explains these changes. If you log onto our website, please look under the "Whats New" section for an explanation of reciprocal functionality in BSI TaxFactoryu2122 9.0
If you have specific scenarios that you need help with, please contact us and we will be happy to assist you.
Regards,
BSI Support - Kathy

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

CALCULATION OF OCTROI IN TAX INJ

Dear Guru,
In the pricing procedure We are following percentage base for the calculation of octroi.The octroi is calculated on the base value excise dutysales tax
I give the basic price and the tax code in the PO and the octroi should be directly calculated on the basic price and the taxes.
1) Our Taxation procedure is TAXINJ
2) In pricing schema We have given the 361 as ALT CBV to octroi condition (JOCM), to calculate the octroi percentage on Octroi Base value that is basic Price excise dutysales tax.
3) As per requirement 361, system should fetch the octroi base value from taxation procedure to pricing schema. But system is transfering some other value than the real octroi base value.
3) Given percentage is calculated over the fetched value. So Octroi amount calculated is wrong.
Please guide us is there any settings are missed out.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Jitendra,
Thanks for your wonderful co-operation. The issue is almost solved. One lat wuery-
We are at present using 20 tax conditions in our tax procedure. But in a single PO we are using only 3 or 4 conditions out of them How can I identify in my program that which tax conditions are actually used in the current printable PO????
I can use table A363 for searching condition records only after identifying the relevent condition type used in a PO otherwise I have to search for all 20 condition types. Please note we are using TAXINN ( condition based) tax procedure.
I am eagerly awaiting for your suggestion. Thanks again,
Priti

Calculation of Fringe Benefit Tax in SAP

Dear all,
I want information about the fringe benefit tax (FBT). How can we configure it in SAP. Is there any standards available? any information on FBT is highly appreciable.
Thanks,

Dear Madhusudhan,
Maintain separate GL for FBT related acounts.
Maintain key word in GL Master.
So only those GLs will be selected for FBT calculation.
Thereafter you can execute reports like F.01 based on keywords to identify values in such accounts. Just apply the rates as per FBT rules and make a provision.
Assign points if useful

Tax relief - Bad debt write off

Hi all,
For a customer with bad debt, it appears standard practice is to use a journal entry to write the debt off to a "Bad Debt" GL account, and then manually reconcile BP balance to zero.
However, the VAT(consumption tax) for the written off amount will still be showing as owed to the government, and will still appear in the TAX report.
In the UK as in other countries, I assume there is relief on bad debt, so the VAT(consumption tax) needs to be written off as well. The only correct way I can think of doing this at the moment is doing a service type credit note with matching tax code of the original invoice specifying the bad debt GL account. In this way, the VAT will also be reversed.
Can anyone advise what method they use, or if there is a proper methodology to do this?
Thanks,
Raj

Hi Gordon,
Thanks for the reply. So as an example, am I correct in thinking the below is the "correct way" to do a write off (if we wanted to avoid doing journal entries):
AR INVOICE - Item Type
Item A x 1 @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50
-->
AR CREDIT NOTE - Service Type
Bad Debt Write Off xxxxxxxxxx (GL a/c no) @GBP100.00
VAT/TAX @GBP17.50 (assuming we specify identical tax code)
-->
Internal reconciliation to zero
Thanks,
Raj

Calculation of With Holding Tax amount

Hi,
We are using the WHT which has the Minimum amount limit as 700 at the Paying document,
The issue is
there is a Paying document which clears 4 MM Invoices (Documents are coming from MIRO)
2 MM Invoice with less than 700 amount and other 2 MM Invoice with more than 700 amount,
the system is calculating the WHT for only 2 documents which are having amount less that 700 while the payment document is generated.
Can any one please suggest whether the WHT should be calculated for only 2 which have amount more than 700
OR it will get deducted for all the 4 MM as the Total of the paying document is more that 700.
Note : The Accumlation type in the WHT is No accumlation.
Looking for a positive riposte.
Thanks
Manish

It has to calculate for 2 docs more than 700 if you select no accumulation & "Minimum Check" Min base amount check at doc invoice level

Calculation of Purchase Order TAX in Smart Form

Hi All !
I am facing problem in purchase Order, how to calculate the value of tax in Purchase order .
in KONV Table, I am getting the value of condition type which r maintained on pricing procedure but, we r not getting the condition type for particular TAX code.
How we can calculate the tax. or
Is there any problem in VOFM/formulas/condition value.
please suggest me.
Thanks & Regards
Priti

Hi Jitendra,
Thanks for your wonderful co-operation. The issue is almost solved. One lat wuery-
We are at present using 20 tax conditions in our tax procedure. But in a single PO we are using only 3 or 4 conditions out of them How can I identify in my program that which tax conditions are actually used in the current printable PO????
I can use table A363 for searching condition records only after identifying the relevent condition type used in a PO otherwise I have to search for all 20 condition types. Please note we are using TAXINN ( condition based) tax procedure.
I am eagerly awaiting for your suggestion. Thanks again,
Priti

FB60 Output Tax calculations (CST, VAT, Service Tax)

HI,
Tax rates are maintained in Condition types in SD module.
For FI transaction we need tax codes in FI. In FTXP when I am giving tax rate system not saving the rates.
Please let me know, how the tax codes are created in FI (when tax rates are maintained in SD conditions types).
Thanks
Partha

I did as below:
1. In FTXP i given percentage for respective tax codes.
2. OB40 I assigned GL accounts for respective tax codes (diff. accts for diff tax code, ie. CST, VAT, Service Tax)
But I used here MWS (which is differ to the SD account key)
Accounts are updating properly.
Can you tell me, is there any problem, or is it right or wrong?
Thanks
Partha

Scripting calculations for subtotal and taxes = grandtotal

I have a work form that lists cost of work preformed. 4 amount fields, a subtotal field, tax, and grand total. I am having an issue collaborating the subtotal, taxes and grandtotal. I have googled everywhere just for basic FormCalc help but to no avail. Any help you can give me will be very much appreciated.
this is the script I foolishly 'thought' would work.
Subtotal - Sum(AMOUNT, AMOUNT, AMOUNT, AMOUNT)
Tax - Sum(TOTAL * .0825)
Grandtotal - SUM(TOTAL, TAX)
I have ran the syntax check on all fields no errors, but I get some extremely weird output when integers are place in the amount fields.
layout --------------
amount
amount
amount
amount
subtotal
taxes
grand total
they are all numeric fields (i don't know if all this is relevant but I'm trying to make this as easy as possible for you to troubleshoot)
thanks in advance
skyler

Sklyer,
The attached is a sample using FormCalc for what you are trying to achieve. In the future you should post requests in the LiveCycle Designer ES forum if the request does not include Barcoded Forms ES. The Designer forum is monitored more closely.
Steve

Calculation of Housing Allowance Tax Relief

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for