Cannot reverse document with future posting date

Hi,
When I tried to reverse a document with future posting date, system gives error F5362 Posting date must not be smaller than XX.XX.XXXX (x = future posting date).
Is it possible to do this in SAP?

Hello,
You need to use reversal reason configured accordingly.
Configure the reversal reason for your purpose:
IMG => Financial Accounting => Business Transactions => Adjustment Posting / Reversal / Define Reasons for Reversal
Make SURE that you have ticked Alt.Pos.dt (Alternative Posting Date) check box.
Save it.
Now use this reversal reason for your posting and give a fugure date.
Make sure that the future posting period is opened but NOT closed.
Please also read F1 on alternative posting date check box:
Indicator: Alternative posting date allowed
Indicator as to whether you are allowed to specify an alternative posting date for the relevant reversal reason.
Use
When you use the reversal reason, the system checks that reversal is not carried out using an alternative posting date and therefore possibly in a later posting period or in a later fiscal year.
Examples
If you want to use negative postings during reversal but only if the reversal is posted in the same period, you can define two reversal reasons:
1st reason: No alternative date allowed, generate negative posting
2nd reason: Alternative date allowed, do not generate negative posting
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Payment run with future posting date

Hi,
There might be a straight forward answer to this question, but for some reason I cannot get it to work the way I believe it should work!
Instead of processing payment runs every day we want to create the payment run only twice a week. However the value date in the payment instruction to the bank should be the actual due date of each invoice. This could result in 2 payment lines to one supplier.
I have found that by setting the indicator "Payment per due date" in the payment method it will generate these 2 payment lines.
The problem is that we also want the clearing document to be split into 2 documents each with the posting date to be equeal to the value date - for some reason I cannot get this to work?
I have looked at substitutionrules and activating an enhancement, but looks like is not possible.
I would have thought this is a standard requirement, but ?
Thanks for helping

Hi,
It seems to be that you have to create 2 payment runs.
Regards,
Svetlin

FPBW: Extract Open Items with a posting date in the future

Dear all,
I'm are currently searching for possibilities to extract Open Items with a posting date in the future from SAP IS-U 4.72 into SAP BW 3.5.
Currently I'm using the Business Content extractor 0FC_OP_01 together with the mass transaction FPBW in IS-U.
The problem I'm facing is within the mass transaction FPBW. I've have set the key date at 01.11.2007, but this job already runs for 52.000 seconds on the same database select-statement.
Does anybody know a possible solution to improve the performance of the statement below? (I pasted it from the process overview)
================================
SELECT
/*+
INDEX("DFKKOP" "DFKKOP~1" "DFKKOP^1" "DFKKOP____1" "DFKKOP____1__X" "DFKKOP_1")
"BETRH" , "BETRW" , "BUDAT" , "BUKRS" , "FAEDN" , "GPART" , "GSBER" , "INKPS" , "SPART" , "VKONT" ,
"WAERS" , "MAHNV" , "ABWBL" , "APPLK" , "AUGBD" , "AUGBL" , "AUGBT" , "AUGDT" , "AUGRD" , "AUGST" ,
"AUGWA" , "BLART" , "BLDAT" , "EMGPA" , "GRKEY" , "HVORG" , "MANSP" , "MWSKZ" , "OPBEL" , "OPSTA" ,
"OPUPK" , "PERSL" , "PYMET" , "QSSHB" , "SBETW" , "SPZAH" , "STUDT" , "TVORG" , "VTREF" , "XBLNR" ,
"XMANL" , "HKONT" , "OPUPZ" , "OPUPW" , "STAKZ" , "WHGRP" , "AUGBS" , "XANZA" , "XRAGL" , "ABWTP" ,
"ASTKZ"
FROM
"DFKKOP"
WHERE
"MANDT" = :A0 AND "AUGST" = :A1 AND "GPART" BETWEEN :A2 AND :A3 AND ( "AUGDT" = :A4 OR "AUGDT" > :A5
AND ( "BUDAT" <= :A6 OR "AUGBD" <= :A7 ) OR "WHGRP" <> :A8 AND "OPUPW" = :A9 )
ORDER BY
"AUGST" , "GPART"#
=================================
I have already tried to create an index on the following fields (in the same order):
- MANDT           Client
- AUGST           Clearing status
- GPART           Business Partner Number
- AUGDT           Clearing date
- BUDAT           Posting Date in the Document
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Steven Groot

Hi Marcos,
When you have created the Restricted keyfigures for Open Items, You have to add the date characteristic on which you are looking open item and add the variable there.Here you have to use a variable of type Interval and select the operator "<" the date of the Variable.If you go through, there are standard variable for keydate, which you can use directly.
Hope you got the idea
Regards
Happy Tony

DOCUMENT SETTING that ALLOW FUTURE POSTING DATE does not work in PL34

Hi Expert,
I am now using SAP B1 2005B (7.40.252) sp:00 pl:34 and realised that the ALLOW Future Posting Date was not working.
I still can remember while I was using pl:11 at B1 2005A, there is no such problem and wish to know when can the bug fix up? in which sp/pl?
Wish to hear goods news ASAP .
Thank you.
Joan.

Basically can you please clarrify your requirement as to what you want to change ..what I understand you would need to change the code for ABAP - RFEBBE00
Value Date code in the above abap
        IF PAR_VALD = 'X'.
          MOVE C2-VALDT TO HLP_VALDT. " VALUE DATE
         write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
        ELSE.
          MOVE C8-BALDT TO HLP_BALDT.
          MOVE HLP_BALDT TO HLP_VALDT.
        write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
        ENDIF.
           MOVE HLP_VALDT(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT.
           MOVE HLP_VALDT2(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT3.
           MOVE HLP_VALDT4(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT6.
Regards
Anurag
Message was edited by: Anurag Bankley

Report for reversed documents which are posted again correctly in SAP

Hi All,
please advise -
For eg : one document is reversed due to incorrect data posting and the team repost it again correctly. in this case we need a report which can validate that the correct entry is posted in SAP and not missed by the processor.
is there any tcode for running a report which can provides us the reversed documents with or without reposted correct document?

Hi Tarun,
is there any tcode for running a report which can provides us the reversed documents with or without reposted correct document?
For GL accounts we can use tcode FBL3N and choose the selection 'Open items' and execute. It will give the lit of all the open items which are not yet processed. Then to get the list of only reversal documents, apply the filter on 'Document Type' as AB.
Regards
Raj

Future Posting Date Not Allowed

Dear Gurus,
Is there any way to restrict the future posting date while issue materials using T/Code MB11 ?
I don't want to know the restriction of document date .
I could not find any sweetable answer from the forum.
With Best Regards
Som

Use the BADI : MB_DOCUMENT_BADI , with the help of abaper ,you can put your validition in the code , so that Posting date should not be greater than System date.

"Cannot draw document with negative rows to credit note"

Hi Experts,
A General query :
I create an AR invoice with two items one with qty 1 and the other with qty (-ve 1) on posting this invoice the second item / row with negative qty gets closed automatically. Now, I require to post a AR Credit note to this invoice i get the following status error message "cannot draw document with negative rows to AR credit note" when copying to a AR Credit note and it is the same the other way when copying from
How is it possible to create a AR credit note to the above scenario. Any sugestions
V. 2007A SP01 PL05
Regards,
Rakesh N

Hi Rakesh N,
version 8.8 supports fully the scenario you outline & I would recommend you upgrade to benefit from the new functionalities introduced in that version. Please have a look at the [8.8 landing page|https://service.sap.com/~sapidb/011000358700000199032009].
Using stand-alone documents & internally reconciling in the lower versions works beautifully on the accounting side yet impacts also the stock side, where corrections in stock value & item cost must be carried out manually.
All the best,
Kerstin

Create reversal document with BAPI: BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.

Hi Guys,
I am Create reversal document with BAPI: BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST.First I am post financial document with BAPI BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST and Same Document. i am Reversal with same BAPI 'BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST'.
New reversal docment is created. but posting key are not changingin reversal docment.whatever posting key created in posting same posting key are created while reversal also.Please help me

check
Mapping of POSTING KEY in BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST

Problem with Reversed document with IDOC interface

I have a problem when I create Idoc which will reverse a document.
I use ACC_DOCUMENT_REVERSE, in Idoc is filled like this -
OBJ_TYPE ( BKPFF )
OBJ_KEY( reverse document number + company code + year)
OBJ_SYS ( system id )
OBJ_KEY_R ( obj_key of document which will reverse )
PSTNG_DATE
COMP_CODE
REASON_REV
I formed OBJ_KEY with one select from table bkpf, and get the last number of documents reversed with Idoc interface. The interface creates Idoc reverse document with number 929xxxxxxx. With fb08 - documents created are 92xxxxxxxx.
The problem is when use transaction fs10n, fill customer account number, and the sums are not right. The documents which was reversed with Idoc did not entered in G/L Account Line Item.
But if I start transaction fbl5n - customer line item, the documents reversed by Idoc is there, and the total sum is right.
How can I resolve this problem?
Greetings,
Lazar Hristov

Hi,
I hope you have reversed the posting.Have you cancelled the downpayment invoice.
Please cancel the first downpayment invoice and post the amount for the second downpayment.
Now try to create the final invoice.
Regards,
Krishna.

Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

Hi,
My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
Please help how to do it.
Regard's
Parag lute

Hi Parag
To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
Hope this anwers your query
Prasad

Issue with the Posting Date of the Purchase Order.

Hi All,
There are fields in BW like SSL1: Time OK, SSL2: Qty OK, SSL3: Time & Qty Ok, SSL4: Days Late (Routines are written to calculate). These fields will indicate whether the delivery against a GR is OK or not with respect to Time, Quantity and the No. of Days..
But here the issue I am facing is
If there is only1 delivery/ GR against a single item the calculation in BW are correct - i.e. for a particular PO if there is only one delivery the above fields like SSL1: Time Ok, SSL2: Qty OK will show like the delivery is done within the specified time and everything is OK (in case if it is delivered within the allotted time)
But if there are multiple deliveries or multiple GR's posted for one PO item, the calculations are going wrong i.e. even if the delivery is done well within the specified time it is showing the wrong calculations like it is delievered too late. Because in this case the earlier dates are overwritten.
Can anyone throw me some light on how can I go about solving this issue.
I am thinking of declaring the Posting Date as the KeyField of the DSO as of now it is a Data field I also want to know the impact of assigning this as a Keyfield.
Thanks in advance,
Prasapbi

Hi,
As I understand, you have a DSO based on Purchase Order and your key field is PO and its line item. The problem as you stated will always be there if you have multiple deliveries/GRs created for a single line item because the system will overwrite the entries for same key.
Problem with adding Posting date as keyfield will be that then your key will be PO-PO Lineitem-Date. When PO will be created, the Posting date will be blank(correct me here if I am wrong), therefore you will have one entry for same PO-line item combination. One without date and other with date, which again would be incorrect. If my assumption about Posting date was wrong, even then your data may not be correct because then you may have many entries with same posting date which again would overwrite each other.
If there is any direct link between PO line item and number of deliveries that will get created for them, then you can bring that field in DSO as keyfield. But I don't think there is any such field.
Looking at your report requirement, I would suggest that you make a DSO based on Goods Receipts and then calculate these keyfigures by comparing the dates between GR posting date and PO line item date.
Else you can change the way your datasource works(if its generic one based on function module). Since your main requirement is to check whether the GR posting date has met your SLA or not, you should fetch all the details only when GR is created and make your key field as PO-PO Line item-GR

2lis_02_scl extract records with wrong posting date for Good Receipts.

Hi Experts,
We are currently having issue of mismatch between BW Schedule Line data with R/3 values for the Goods Receipts posting date updating incorrectly in to BW.
Example.
In table EKBE purchase order history we have following records.
MANDT EBELN        EBELP   ZEKKN VGABE GJAHR BELNR      BUZEI BEWTP BWART BUDAT      MENGE
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0001 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0002 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012473031 0003 E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010 5012693310 0001 E     101   26.02.2010        1.250,000
Which means we have on posting date of 23.01.2010 1250*3 i.e. 3750 quantity of Goods Receipts.
However when we check the extractor we get multiple records in internal table C_T_DATA and in psa.
Line BWV ETENR   SLFDT              MENGE    ROCA BEDAT                            BUDAT          EBELN
       ORG                                                        NCEL
1     001     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
2     001     0002     20100226     1250.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
3     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
4     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
5     003     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
6     003     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
7     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
8     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
9     002     0002     20100226     1250.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
As can be seen we have record no 8 for ETENR (Schedule line 1) with posting date 26.02.2010 and another record with posting date 23.01.2010.
Since we are getting 2 records the record with incorrect posting date overwrites the record with correct one.
Any idea if this could be a standard extractor problem or any other way to resolve this issue.
Any help would be appreciated.

First of all, are you using a staging DSO? (You should ideally)
If yes, is it a Write Optimized DSO? (Again, this is ideal)
If its a standard DSO, the values maybe over-writing upon activation.
You have 3 records (quantity = 1250 * 3) that have been receipted on 23.01.2010, where Posting Date = 23.01.2010.
You also have a record (quantity = 1250 * 1) that has been receipted on 26.01.2010. Posting date = 26.01.2010.
Now, in RSA3 & in PSA you can see more records than intended.
This is because you have before & after images. (ROCANCEL = X or blank).
ROCANCEL = X --> Before Image (record before change)
ROCANCEL = blank --> After Image (record after change)
This is a standard property of the extractor.
Now, we also have something known as BWVORG (Process Keys). Each process, i.e. creating a PO, Goods Receipt, Invoice etc.. have different Process Keys.
Creation - 001
Goods Rcpt. - 002
Invoice - 003
We can see that record 8, i.e. BWVORG = 002 (GR) has been modified on 26.01.2010.
That is why there is before image and after image.
Which one should be the correct posting date? 23.01.2010?
Normally in a Write optimized DSO, you will have all the records (before and after images & others as well).
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if otherwise.

Cannot sign documents with Adobe Reader 10.1.3 - 10.1.10, Can sign document with 10.1.2 and 11.0.07

Cannot sign documents with Adobe Reader 10.1.3 - 10.1.10, Can sign document with 10.1.2 and 11.0.07
In my environment, we have 10.1.2 that's currently packaged. Our CIO was able to sign documents via signature with no problem. Later he got updated to 10.1.9, no longer can sign.
During testing I was able to confirm that 10.1.2 signed without problems, but anything that, it goes kaput, the Sign and options are not listed.
Latest Adobe Reader can sign... any ideas?

I'm having a similar problem. What I'm trying to do is print a Microsoft Word 2010 document with paper size A4 to Adobe pdf document paper size A4. I select "A4" for paper size in word and then print using Adobe print standard settings. What I get is an Adobe document in 8.5 x 11. This is an issue because these are patent documents for electronic filing in WIPO and they must be in A4 size.
If I select other sizes in Word, such as A3, Tabloid, and Legal, the Adobe file is in the same paper size.
If I print a Powerpoint document in A4 to Adobe, the Adobe file page size is A4.
If I print an Adobe file in 8.5 x11 to Adobe A4, the second Adobe file is in A4.
Any help?

Error 'cannot cancel document with a down payment that was drawn to invoice

Error 'cannot cancel document with a down payment that was drawn to invoice. We need to void a check and are getting this message. We also get message when trying to cancel the outgoing payment. The AP Down payment is closed, and the AP invoice is also closed. Is there a way to 'undraw' the down payment on the AP invoice? How can this be voided? Any guidance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

Hi,
Check the following thread
Re: Down payment invoice
Can not void a check win paid from a down payment invoice
Re: Cancel down payment
*Close the thread if issue solved.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

Change posted reversed FI document (G/L) posting date

Hi All, my finance staff wrongly enter the posting date when she reverse a FI document. She wanted to know the way to change the poster reversed FI document, if possible.
Or
can she undo the reverse process back to before reverse so that she can redo...
thanks. Looi

Hi,
Reversal document can'be reversed again.
You have to post a manual entry for this using F-02.
Also you can use FBR2(Select Generate reverse posting)
Rgds
Murali. N

Cannot reverse document with future posting date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for