Future Posting Date Not Allowed

Dear Gurus,
Is there any way to restrict the future posting date while issue materials using T/Code MB11 ?
I don't want to know the restriction of document date .
I could not find any sweetable answer from the forum.
With Best Regards
Som

Use the BADI   : MB_DOCUMENT_BADI    , with the help of abaper ,you  can  put your validition in the code , so that Posting date should not be greater than System date.

Similar Messages

  • DOCUMENT SETTING that ALLOW FUTURE POSTING DATE does not work in PL34

    Hi Expert,
    I am now using SAP B1 2005B (7.40.252) sp:00 pl:34 and realised that the ALLOW Future Posting Date was not working. 
    I still can remember while I was using pl:11 at B1 2005A, there is no such problem and wish to know when can the bug fix up? in which sp/pl?
    Wish to hear goods news ASAP .
    Thank you.
    Joan.

    Basically can you please clarrify your requirement as to what you want to change ..what I understand you would need to change the code for ABAP - RFEBBE00
    Value Date code in the above abap
            IF PAR_VALD = 'X'.
              MOVE C2-VALDT TO HLP_VALDT.  "  VALUE DATE
             write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
            ELSE.
              MOVE C8-BALDT TO HLP_BALDT.
              MOVE HLP_BALDT TO HLP_VALDT.
            write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
            ENDIF.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT2(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT3.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT4(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT6.
    Regards
    Anurag
    Message was edited by: Anurag Bankley

  • Error in CJ88  Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)

    When i try CJ88 with a wbs element, it shows the following error :
    Posting transaction is not possible (value date not allowed)
    Message no. AA 478
    Diagnosis
    A retirement was already posted on the asset 000022400733 0041 on 20091231. Based on the value date 20091231 of the transaction, this transaction should have been included in the calculation of values for the retirement.
    System Response
    The transaction is rejected.
    Procedure
    Check the value date of the transaction.
    In need to put year 2009 in date of the transaction, but it isnt posible. ¿Why? I dont know very much about asset accounting...

    Hi
    It is not allowing for WBS element final settlement, because of your asset already retairement was done.
    By best suggetion is, You will create the new WBS element and transfer the all cost line items from old WBS element to new WBS element, then you will try to settlement for another asset in CJ88.
    I hope it will use for you.
    Regards
    PVCPVC

  • ABUMN-error "Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"

    Hi,
    When we are trying to transfer asset within company code thru Tcode ABUMN, we are getting a error as
    "Posting transaction is not possible (Value date not allowed)"
    What actually we are doing is we are trying to transfer the previous year asset for example say 01.04.2007 assets on today.
    the Parameters are as below
    Document date :26.03.2008
    Posting Date :26.03.2008
    Asset value date is 01.04.2007.
    Then the system is throwing an error and not alloing to post the previous year transfers.
    Can any one help me out.
    Cheers
    Sri

    Hi,
    I think, if you give old asset value date, system will give you the error.  This may be because, you are trying to transfer the assets with old values, means in your examble the dep. from the 01.04.2007 to 29.02.2008 whould have been charged.
    So, give the current year date means any date from 01.01.2008 to till date.
    If you read F1 help for the value date column, it states,
    Asset value date
    The asset value date is the value date for Asset Accounting. It can deviate from the posting and document date and be in posting periods already closed for Financial Accounting. However, the posting year and asset value date year must be the same.
    Since the asset value date can have a direct influence on the amount of depreciation, the system creates a default value when it can. You can specify in Customizing how the the default asset value date is  determined by the system.
    Hope it helps
    Saravanan.A

  • Cannot reverse document with future posting date

    Hi,
    When I tried to reverse a document with future posting date, system gives error F5362 Posting date must not be smaller than XX.XX.XXXX (x = future posting date).
    Is it possible to do this in SAP?

    Hello,
    You need to use reversal reason configured accordingly.
    Configure the reversal reason for your purpose:
    IMG => Financial Accounting => Business Transactions => Adjustment Posting / Reversal / Define Reasons for Reversal
    Make SURE that you have ticked Alt.Pos.dt (Alternative Posting Date) check box.
    Save it.
    Now use this reversal reason for your posting and give a fugure date.
    Make sure that the future posting period is opened but NOT closed.
    Please also read F1 on alternative posting date check box:
    Indicator: Alternative posting date allowed
    Indicator as to whether you are allowed to specify an alternative posting date for the relevant reversal reason.
    Use
    When you use the reversal reason, the system checks that reversal is not carried out using an alternative posting date and therefore possibly in a later posting period or in a later fiscal year.
    Examples
    If you want to use negative postings during reversal but only if the reversal is posted in the same period, you can define two reversal reasons:
    1st reason: No alternative date allowed, generate negative posting
    2nd reason: Alternative date allowed, do not generate negative posting
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

    Hi,
    My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
    Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
          then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
    Please help how to do it.
    Regard's
    Parag lute

    Hi Parag
    To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
    Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
    Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
    Hope this anwers your query
    Prasad

  • Error AA168 Ord.dep.start date not allowed in dep.area 60 (Please correct)

    Hi experts,
    We upgraded to ECC6 from 4.7 version last month.
    For some assets we have start deprecation date filled for area 60 with deprecation key LINV.
    We would like to modify deprecation key to 0000 but we have error "AA168 Ord.dep.start date not allowed in dep.area 60 (Please correct)"
    Have you any idea to resolve this issue.
    Thank you in advance
    Kind Regards.

    Dear Shankar
    here is what i have in transaction
    001     01/01/02/02          01     01     02     02
    002     01/01/01/01          01     01     01     01
    003     01/06/02/02          01     06     02     02
    004     06/06/02/02          06     06     02     02
    i do not anderstand any thing in this transaction
    Can you help me resolving this issue?
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind regards

  • Future Posting date in Automatic Payment Program

    Hi Gurus,
    Because the customer procedure, we need to run the payment proposal one
    week before the payment execution, however this cause conflict in the
    last week of month because we need to choose between:
    - Open the future posting period (we can use the Authorization Group
    field)
    - Create the payment proposal with a current posting date (For
    Display/Edit), delete it and re-run the proposal when postin period has
    been opened
    The questions here are:
    - Why the posting period is validated in proposal run if this process
    doesn't create any posting?
    - Do we have more options to manage this process?
    This is the error message when Payment proposal ran and the future posting period is closed:
    'For Company '&' posting period '&/&' has not been opened' Error message: FZ 321
    Thanks in advance and Best Regards,

    Hi,
    Proposal Run, Payment Run and Payment Medium are intented to happen in sequence. In your scenario, i suppose second option ypu specified is the only options. proposal picks up open items meeting the criteria in parametres and set it payment run. i suppose items in a open proposal are locked for processing in other F110. you can refer to  Note 545340 - FAQ: Payment run F110 for options
    or http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/47/8bf634b576bc4ee10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
    Rgds.

  • Payment run with future posting date

    Hi,
    There might be a straight forward answer to this question, but for some reason I cannot get it to work the way I believe it should work!
    Instead of processing payment runs every day we want to create the payment run only twice a week. However the value date in the payment instruction to the  bank should be the actual due date of each invoice. This could result in 2 payment lines to one supplier.
    I have found that by setting the indicator "Payment per due date" in the payment method it will generate these 2 payment lines.
    The problem is that we also want the clearing document to be split into 2 documents each with the posting date to be equeal to the value date - for some reason I cannot get this to work?
    I have looked at substitutionrules and activating an enhancement, but looks like is not possible.
    I would have thought this is a standard requirement, but ?
    Thanks for helping

    Hi,
    It seems to be that you have to create 2 payment runs.
    Regards,
    Svetlin

  • GR Posting Date-not modifiable

    Hi Friends,
    We have business requirement to have GR posting date should always default to the current date and not modifiable.  Business client does not wants anyone to receive goods in the past. Please tell me how to achieve this settings?.
    Thanks
    Abdul

    Hi
    Try Field selection for MIGO transaction
    Path:SPRO-MM-IM--->field selection for header -->Select display option for doc date.
    Vivek
    Edited by: Vivek N on Dec 29, 2008 3:52 PM

  • Posting date not open

    posting period 001 2007 is not open
    this is what i get trying to post an inbound mbgmcr idoc
    i use posting date 20070115
    when i look in trans omsy for my company code 3000
       i see 2007 2  2007 1  2006 
    how can i open this period up

    Hi
    I have no MM consultant.  I am it.
    So  
    I actually think it is the format i am using
    in transaction omsy  i see 3000  2007   3   2007  2
    so in we19 for processing inbound mbgmcr goods movement i am trying to use a posting date of 20070215
    i have tried lots of combinations but it says
    posting only possible in periods 2007/03 and 2007/02 in cc 3000
    so what format combination should i use in the posting date in we19
    thank you so much

  • GL_JE_HEADER table : Posted date not update properly

    Hi All,
    I have seen that for few of the journals created inside GL,  The posted date inside the GL_JE_HEADER table is update with a date instead of time stamp.
    i.e  the posted date column is updated as '7/08/2013'  instead of  '7/08/2013 4:40:39 AM'
    This has caused some problem in te system.
    was wondering if you could help me to get an answer for this.
    regards
    Amit

    i am thinking that you want to include the time when you query the column post_date from table. if you are using SQL*Plus the default display for the date does not include the time. to include the time when you do a select on any data column use the ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT command.
    e.g.
    SQL> select sysdate from dual;
    SYSDATE
    18-SEP-13
    SQL> alter session set nls_date_format = 'dd-mon-yyyy hh:mi:ss am';
    Session altered.
    SQL> select sysdate from dual;
    SYSDATE
    18-sep-2013 11:57:17 am
    SQL>

  • Clearing after posting date not required in FF67

    Hi
    I have given posting date as 31.01.2010 in FF67 (manual bank reconciliation statement).
    But in-spite of the posting date is given as 31.01.2010, all the entries posted with posting date of February in incoming account / outgoing account is also considered for clearing.
    So is it possible to restrict the same.

    Hi,
    You might have entered an amount of a document, which is posted with FEB posting date, while entering the bank statement items in the next screen of FF67.
    The clearing date can be earlier than the posting date while FF67.
    The actual posting date (FEB date) will become the value date for the reconciliation posting entry to the main bank account line item. (Line item generated by system by doing FF67)
    Please check.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Sched.start date not allowing on week-ends for fwd scheduling process order

    Hello Experts,
    For a process order & scheduling typr forward/in time if I take sat or sunday as a start date then if I click on schedule, system changes it to previous workin day (friday). But however if i select backward/in time scheduling type & put week ends as finish day then system does not change this date.
    How can I make system to allow schedule start date on week ends also for forward/in time scheduling type. in a factory calendor sat & sunday are holidays. while for work center, calender sat & sunday are marked as working days.
    Thanks for advance,
    Vijay.

    Hi
    it depends upon client requirement.you must have defined the holiday calender as well.if you select the public holidays in your factory calender.then system will allow you to do your daily transctions on public holidays as well and vice versa.so better go with all options selected .and plz check at your end
    plz revert back if it works
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • How Does Apple Determine What Posts Are Not Allowed to Remain?

    Apple has deleted 2 posts that, while not favorable to Leopard, do not seem to violate any of the rules. I noticed that not all posts are favorable (naturally) but remain posted. Does Apple just search for the poster's user name and remove on that basis? I'll try posting the same message under another user name and see if it get's deleted or not. I am assuming that this message will be deemed to violate Apple's policy and Apple will remove this post very quickly.

    C O'Kane wrote:
    So if one just says: I installed Leopard and lost all data and all third party applications and the Genius Bar could not fix and the data recovery place could not fix either in response to a posted question: "how was your experience with Leopard?" ..... is that a violation of the policy? It does not seem like it should be but that's the fact scenarioc
    Yes. It has nothing to do with asking a specific technical question and asking for an answer.
    This is not the Daily Agony Column that Holmes likes to read. It's not what you "seem" to want for a message board post.
    The title here is Installation and Setup. I would ask a deeper question, however, which is why you would want to make such a post? To scare others? To make yourself "feel" better? What would be the point? You don't walk into a Post Office and start ranting about a letter you got from an Aunt who just cut you off in her will. I mean, you might, but why?
    The fact is that there are many posts here on these boards that are unfavorable towards Apple and Leopard and even Apple staff. But they contain enough "meat" that they are not deleted.
    Of the posts that I have seen vanish, most had nothing in them of any value. It's also interesting that many rants are from people who purportedly speak English but cannot spell simple words and know nothing about punctuation. In my holistic view of the world, I am not surprised that their computers crashed upon upgrading to Leopard. I keep repeating that it is all attention to details.

Maybe you are looking for

  • My apple TV is not connecting to my tv what might be wrong

    When I turn on my apple TV box my television says no signal. Every couple of minutes the apple TV home screen will flash up on the screen. Any idea what the problem might be.

  • Public_www problem with users aliases

    Hi, we have NW6.5sp7 and users(students) can publish ours www pages through public_www adr at your homedir. We needed to make a aliases to every existing logins (due new strategy of making login names). But once we make any alias for any login, from

  • Troubled Player

    I am having problems playing games on Facebook. My game screen keeps stopping for about 15 seconds and then starting again. I was told that my Adobe Flash needs some adjustment? So I need some help as to what I am doing wrong. Can someone advise me p

  • Partner URL in the footer of clients Email

    Hello, One of my clients is trying to send an email 'From Scratch' , and my partner site URL is showing up in the bottom of the footer. Where would they go about removing this link? Thanks!

  • Problem with WebCamera example

    When I run WebCamera application (as Air application) in FlexBuilder on my MacBook Pro, I get the following startup error (see below). After I select "continue" and then select "Start," I get another error (further down). Also, I've run the DefaultPo