Payment run with future posting date

Hi,
There might be a straight forward answer to this question, but for some reason I cannot get it to work the way I believe it should work!
Instead of processing payment runs every day we want to create the payment run only twice a week. However the value date in the payment instruction to the  bank should be the actual due date of each invoice. This could result in 2 payment lines to one supplier.
I have found that by setting the indicator "Payment per due date" in the payment method it will generate these 2 payment lines.
The problem is that we also want the clearing document to be split into 2 documents each with the posting date to be equeal to the value date - for some reason I cannot get this to work?
I have looked at substitutionrules and activating an enhancement, but looks like is not possible.
I would have thought this is a standard requirement, but ?
Thanks for helping

Hi,
It seems to be that you have to create 2 payment runs.
Regards,
Svetlin

Similar Messages

  • Cannot reverse document with future posting date

    Hi,
    When I tried to reverse a document with future posting date, system gives error F5362 Posting date must not be smaller than XX.XX.XXXX (x = future posting date).
    Is it possible to do this in SAP?

    Hello,
    You need to use reversal reason configured accordingly.
    Configure the reversal reason for your purpose:
    IMG => Financial Accounting => Business Transactions => Adjustment Posting / Reversal / Define Reasons for Reversal
    Make SURE that you have ticked Alt.Pos.dt (Alternative Posting Date) check box.
    Save it.
    Now use this reversal reason for your posting and give a fugure date.
    Make sure that the future posting period is opened but NOT closed.
    Please also read F1 on alternative posting date check box:
    Indicator: Alternative posting date allowed
    Indicator as to whether you are allowed to specify an alternative posting date for the relevant reversal reason.
    Use
    When you use the reversal reason, the system checks that reversal is not carried out using an alternative posting date and therefore possibly in a later posting period or in a later fiscal year.
    Examples
    If you want to use negative postings during reversal but only if the reversal is posted in the same period, you can define two reversal reasons:
    1st reason: No alternative date allowed, generate negative posting
    2nd reason: Alternative date allowed, do not generate negative posting
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • FPBW: Extract Open Items with a posting date in the future

    Dear all,
    I'm are currently searching for possibilities to extract Open Items with a posting date in the future from SAP IS-U 4.72 into SAP BW 3.5.
    Currently I'm using the Business Content extractor 0FC_OP_01 together with the mass transaction FPBW in IS-U.
    The problem I'm facing is within the mass transaction FPBW. I've have set the key date at 01.11.2007, but this job already runs for 52.000 seconds on the same database select-statement.
    Does anybody know a possible solution to improve the performance of the statement below? (I pasted it from the process overview)
    ================================
    SELECT
    /*+
      INDEX("DFKKOP" "DFKKOP~1" "DFKKOP^1" "DFKKOP____1" "DFKKOP____1__X" "DFKKOP_1")
      "BETRH" , "BETRW" , "BUDAT" , "BUKRS" , "FAEDN" , "GPART" , "GSBER" , "INKPS" , "SPART" , "VKONT" ,
      "WAERS" , "MAHNV" , "ABWBL" , "APPLK" , "AUGBD" , "AUGBL" , "AUGBT" , "AUGDT" , "AUGRD" , "AUGST" ,
      "AUGWA" , "BLART" , "BLDAT" , "EMGPA" , "GRKEY" , "HVORG" , "MANSP" , "MWSKZ" , "OPBEL" , "OPSTA" ,
      "OPUPK" , "PERSL" , "PYMET" , "QSSHB" , "SBETW" , "SPZAH" , "STUDT" , "TVORG" , "VTREF" , "XBLNR" ,
      "XMANL" , "HKONT" , "OPUPZ" , "OPUPW" , "STAKZ" , "WHGRP" , "AUGBS" , "XANZA" , "XRAGL" , "ABWTP" ,
      "ASTKZ"
    FROM
      "DFKKOP"
    WHERE
      "MANDT" = :A0 AND "AUGST" = :A1 AND "GPART" BETWEEN :A2 AND :A3 AND ( "AUGDT" = :A4 OR "AUGDT" > :A5
      AND ( "BUDAT" <= :A6 OR "AUGBD" <= :A7 ) OR "WHGRP" <> :A8 AND "OPUPW" = :A9 )
    ORDER BY
      "AUGST" , "GPART"#
    =================================
    I have already tried to create an index on the following fields (in the same order):
    - MANDT           Client
    - AUGST           Clearing status
    - GPART           Business Partner Number
    - AUGDT           Clearing date
    - BUDAT           Posting Date in the Document
    Any help would be appreciated!
    Thanks in advance,
    Steven Groot

    Hi Marcos,
    When you have created the Restricted keyfigures for Open Items, You have to add the date characteristic on which you are looking open item and add the variable there.Here you have to use a variable of type Interval and select the operator "<" the date of the Variable.If you go through, there are standard variable for keydate, which you can use directly.
    Hope you got the idea
    Regards
    Happy Tony

  • Future Posting Date Not Allowed

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any way to restrict the future posting date while issue materials using T/Code MB11 ?
    I don't want to know the restriction of document date .
    I could not find any sweetable answer from the forum.
    With Best Regards
    Som

    Use the BADI   : MB_DOCUMENT_BADI    , with the help of abaper ,you  can  put your validition in the code , so that Posting date should not be greater than System date.

  • Future posting date in MIGO MIRO

    Hi,
    My client want that system should not allow future posting date than current system date in MIGO & MIRO.
    Ex. current system date: 30.12.2008
          then system should not allow posting date 31.12.2008.
    Please help how to do it.
    Regard's
    Parag lute

    Hi Parag
    To meet your client requirement, you need to change the message F5 192 from warning to Error.
    Since this message F5 192 is not a customised, ABAP need to change code.Contact ABAPer.
    Also you can check with OSS if they have any note for this requirement.
    Hope this anwers your query
    Prasad

  • Issue with the Posting Date of the Purchase Order.

    Hi All,
    There are fields in BW like SSL1: Time OK, SSL2: Qty OK, SSL3: Time & Qty Ok, SSL4: Days Late (Routines are written to calculate). These fields will indicate whether the delivery against a GR is OK or not with respect to Time, Quantity and the No. of Days..
    But here the issue I am facing is
    If there is only1 delivery/ GR against a single item the calculation in BW are correct - i.e. for a particular PO if there is only one delivery the above fields like SSL1: Time Ok, SSL2: Qty OK will show like the delivery is done within the specified time and everything is OK (in case if it is delivered within the allotted time)
    But if there are multiple deliveries or multiple GR's  posted for one PO item, the calculations are going wrong i.e. even if the delivery is done well within the specified time it is showing the wrong calculations like it is delievered too late. Because in this case the earlier dates are overwritten.
    Can anyone throw me some light on how can I go about solving this issue.
    I am thinking of declaring the Posting Date as the KeyField of the DSO as of now it is a Data field  I also want to know the impact of assigning this as a Keyfield.
    Thanks in advance,
    Prasapbi

    Hi,
    As I understand, you have a DSO based on Purchase Order and your key field is PO and its line item. The problem as you stated will always be there if you have multiple deliveries/GRs created for a single line item because the system will overwrite the entries for same key.
    Problem with adding Posting date as keyfield will be that then your key will be PO-PO Lineitem-Date. When PO will be created, the Posting date will be blank(correct me here if I am wrong), therefore you will have one entry for same PO-line item combination. One without date and other with date, which again would be incorrect. If my assumption about Posting date was wrong, even then your data may not be correct because then you may have many entries with same posting date which again would overwrite each other.
    If there is any direct link between PO line item and number of deliveries that will get created for them, then you can bring that field in DSO as keyfield. But I don't think there is any such field.
    Looking at your report requirement, I would suggest that you make a DSO based on Goods Receipts and then calculate these keyfigures by comparing the dates between GR posting date and PO line item date.
    Else you can change the way your datasource works(if its generic one based on function module). Since your main requirement is to check whether the GR posting date has met your SLA or not, you should fetch all the details only when GR is created and make your key field as PO-PO Line item-GR

  • 2lis_02_scl extract records with wrong posting date for Good Receipts.

    Hi Experts,
    We are currently having issue of mismatch between BW Schedule Line data with R/3 values for the Goods Receipts posting date updating incorrectly in to BW.
    Example.
    In table EKBE purchase order history we have following records.
    MANDT EBELN        EBELP   ZEKKN VGABE GJAHR BELNR      BUZEI BEWTP BWART BUDAT      MENGE
    501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010  5012473031 0001  E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
    501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010  5012473031 0002  E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
    501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010  5012473031 0003  E     101   23.01.2010        1.250,000
    501   5600453404   00010   00    1     2010  5012693310 0001  E     101   26.02.2010        1.250,000
    Which means we have on posting date of 23.01.2010 1250*3 i.e. 3750 quantity of Goods Receipts.
    However when we check the extractor we get multiple records in internal table C_T_DATA and in psa.
    Line BWV ETENR   SLFDT              MENGE    ROCA BEDAT                            BUDAT          EBELN
           ORG                                                        NCEL
    1     001     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
    2     001     0002     20100226     1250.000          20100113     ZNB     F     00000000     5600453404
    3     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
    4     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100123     5600453404
    5     003     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
    6     003     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100127     5600453404
    7     002     0001     20100125     3750.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
    8     002     0001     20100125     3750.000          20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
    9     002     0002     20100226     1250.000     X     20100113     ZNB     F     20100226     5600453404
    As can be seen we have record no 8 for ETENR (Schedule line 1) with posting date 26.02.2010 and another record with posting date 23.01.2010.
    Since we are getting 2 records the record with incorrect posting date overwrites the record with correct one.
    Any idea if this could be a standard extractor problem or any other way to resolve this issue.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    First of all, are you using a staging DSO? (You should ideally)
    If yes, is it a Write Optimized DSO? (Again, this is ideal)
    If its a standard DSO, the values maybe over-writing upon activation.
    You have 3 records (quantity = 1250 * 3) that have been receipted on 23.01.2010, where Posting Date = 23.01.2010.
    You also have a record (quantity = 1250 * 1) that has been receipted on 26.01.2010. Posting date = 26.01.2010.
    Now, in RSA3 & in PSA you can see more records than intended.
    This is because you have before & after images. (ROCANCEL = X or blank).
    ROCANCEL = X --> Before Image (record before change)
    ROCANCEL = blank --> After Image (record after change)
    This is a standard property of the extractor.
    Now, we also have something known as BWVORG (Process Keys). Each process, i.e. creating a PO, Goods Receipt, Invoice etc.. have different Process Keys.
    Creation - 001
    Goods Rcpt. - 002
    Invoice - 003
    We can see that record 8, i.e. BWVORG = 002 (GR) has been modified on 26.01.2010.
    That is why there is before image and after image.
    Which one should be the correct posting date? 23.01.2010?
    Normally in a Write optimized DSO, you will have all the records (before and after images & others as well).
    I hope this helps.
    Please let me know if otherwise.

  • DOCUMENT SETTING that ALLOW FUTURE POSTING DATE does not work in PL34

    Hi Expert,
    I am now using SAP B1 2005B (7.40.252) sp:00 pl:34 and realised that the ALLOW Future Posting Date was not working. 
    I still can remember while I was using pl:11 at B1 2005A, there is no such problem and wish to know when can the bug fix up? in which sp/pl?
    Wish to hear goods news ASAP .
    Thank you.
    Joan.

    Basically can you please clarrify your requirement as to what you want to change ..what I understand you would need to change the code for ABAP - RFEBBE00
    Value Date code in the above abap
            IF PAR_VALD = 'X'.
              MOVE C2-VALDT TO HLP_VALDT.  "  VALUE DATE
             write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
            ELSE.
              MOVE C8-BALDT TO HLP_BALDT.
              MOVE HLP_BALDT TO HLP_VALDT.
            write hlp_valdt to umsatz-budat dd/mm/yy.
            ENDIF.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT2(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT3.
               MOVE HLP_VALDT4(2) TO UMSATZ-BUDAT6.
    Regards
    Anurag
    Message was edited by: Anurag Bankley

  • Future Posting date in Automatic Payment Program

    Hi Gurus,
    Because the customer procedure, we need to run the payment proposal one
    week before the payment execution, however this cause conflict in the
    last week of month because we need to choose between:
    - Open the future posting period (we can use the Authorization Group
    field)
    - Create the payment proposal with a current posting date (For
    Display/Edit), delete it and re-run the proposal when postin period has
    been opened
    The questions here are:
    - Why the posting period is validated in proposal run if this process
    doesn't create any posting?
    - Do we have more options to manage this process?
    This is the error message when Payment proposal ran and the future posting period is closed:
    'For Company '&' posting period '&/&' has not been opened' Error message: FZ 321
    Thanks in advance and Best Regards,

    Hi,
    Proposal Run, Payment Run and Payment Medium are intented to happen in sequence. In your scenario, i suppose second option ypu specified is the only options. proposal picks up open items meeting the criteria in parametres and set it payment run. i suppose items in a open proposal are locked for processing in other F110. you can refer to  Note 545340 - FAQ: Payment run F110 for options
    or http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/47/8bf634b576bc4ee10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
    Rgds.

  • Report for payment runs with multiple bank accounts

    Hi everyone,
    I'm looking for a report that displays the results of a payment run(or payment runs) & throws in some payables and cash information as well.  The report should include the following information:
    Supplier | Source document ID | Invoice ID | External Reference ID | Payment Run ID | Payment ID | 'Supplier Bank Account' that the payment was paid to | Payment Status (or potentially invoice status) | Payment Method
    I've tried combining several data sources but can't seem to find the correct sources to join in order to get all these fields...Any help would be appreciated.
    thanks,
    -Ben

    When you enter bank details in master, update field "Partner bank type" LFBK-BVTYP with free form value, may be currency is good choice.
    During invoice entry, this field is available for update, update which bank to be used for payment of this invoice. You may build logic to populate this field, like substitution to populate currency in this field during invoice posting.
    During payment, system checks value in field Partner bank type in invoice and selects corresponding bank.
    Hope this helps.

  • How to cancel  Payment Run with cheque generated

    Hi All,
    We have printed wrong  Invoices.Payment run is being done and cheques are generated .We would like to do Payment run again by correcting our Invoices.Please advise the steps to resolve it
    Thanks in Advance
    Regards,
    Payal Saxena

    Hello,
    Please follow the following process:
    1. Go to TC: FCH8, cancel the payment (here you have to cancel the payment cheque by cheque)
    2. Go to F110>click edit>select Payment>delete output. Again click on edit>select proposal-->delete.
    3. Go to TC: FBRA, here you have to reset the data means after reset the clearing docs cleared items will come into open items.
    Now, you can check the Vendor open items and run F110 with correct data
    Thanks
    Para

  • Little help with FORM POST data not in UTF-8 (JSP/servlet)

    Hello,
    I am trying to update a MySQL database record with UTF-8 characters with my JSP application.
    1) I have MySQL correctly configured to handle UTF8 and have tested insert/update/select with UTF8 characters
    2) I have an "editRecord.jsp" page. At the top of the page, I specify:
    <% request.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8"); %>
    3) I have an input form which is specified in that page which follows:
    <form action="<c:url value="/updateRecord.jsp"/>"
    name="updatetForm" method="post"
    ACCEPT-CHARSET="UTF-8"
    enctype="multipart/form-data">
    4) I have a servlet filter that takes every HttpServletRequest and modifies that object in
    doFilter(...){
    request.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8");
    chain.doFilter(...)
    5) In updateRecord.jsp, I fill a JavaBean with the form data. Here's an example of the form input:
    name = Company
    Comments=Here's some unicode text: "&#1610;&#1606;&#1610; &#1573;&#1606; &#1576;&#1604;&#1575;&#1583;&#1607; &#1605;
    6) When I put a breakpoint and inspect the contents of the UpdateBean after posting the form, running the request through the filter, I see
    I see:
    name = Company
    Comments=Here's some unicode text: &#132;������...."
    Where could I possibly be missing something to force UTF8 encoding of these values?

    If you have to use the following code to fix the encoding:
    String value = new String(item.getString().getBytes("ISO-8859-1"), "UTF-8"); ...
    then you are just putting a band aid on something that is broken somewhere else (since this code creates a byte array in 8859-1 and then creates a string from that byte array, but assuming that the array is encoded in UTF-8). That will only work if the string you start out with is mangled.
    In many cases such a fix will actually "work" (in the sense that you may end up with something that is correctly encoded in the end), but you run the risk of breaking if the source of the original corruption is removed.

  • Depreciation run from the posting date

    Hi Team
    My client want deprecition to be posted from the Posting date instead of start date of the document period
    he is trying to  post assets through F -90 it calculates depreciation from the
    start date of the doc. period
    Eg., Asset no 8000000049
    Document date-11.11.09
    posting date-21.11.09
    depreciation is calculated from 01.11.2009 but he want from 21.11.09. further
    if the document month and posting month are differenet the depreciation
    is getting calculated from the document month.But he want depreciation to be posted from posting date only in both scenaio's
    Kindly give us info -any config changes can be done, give necess. steps to follow
    thanks
    Bbindu

    Hi,
    Please go to your asset master (AS02), and see which dep key is assigned to your book depreciation area in depreciation areas tab.
    Then set your COD with OAPL.
    Go to AFAMA and choose your dep key, which you found in your assset master, double click on the dep key...
    There one check box will be available as Dep to the day...select it. SAVE
    Now check your asset in AW01N, now it will calculate dep from asset posting date.
    Thanks,
    Srinu

  • Alerts/Remindrs to process S/O with future Delivery Date

    Is it possible to create an Alert or Reminder, that will alert the user (or users) who creates a Sales Order with a future Delivery Date to process the Sales Order?

    I am looking for the alert to remind the Order Entry department they have pending orders that need to be processed.
    The Alert should say" Sales Order Number(s): xxxxx1, xxxxx2, xxxxx3 need to be processed. These alerts should be generated 5 days before the delivery date.
    Often times we have customers that will place an order, but they state they do not need it until a week or two from the time the order is placed. We then generate the sales order, but will not print the "Pick Ticket" to the warehouse until three days before the customer expects the product and Order Entry will forget to process these sales orders; this is why the alerts are needed.

  • Problem with the Posting Date of Goods Receipt or Invoice Receipt for PO

    Hi All,
    I am working on 2LIS_02_SCL - Purchasing Data (Schedule Line Level),
    For our report, we should get the scheduled PO quantity,actual PO qty, Scheduled date and actual date in the report.
    we are getting all these fields from the above extractor...
    For a PO which is opened (Delivery Completion indicator not set) - we where getting all field as in ECC(ME23N)
    But for a PO which is finished(Delivery completion indicator is set) - we where are getting actual GR qty,planned qty,planned or scheduled date at schedule line level.But we are not getting the Posting Date of Goods Receipt or Invoice Receipt for PO from history EKBE for all the schedule line.
    ex:
    for open PO
    PO num         item num   schedule line    Planned date   actual date  difference  actual qty  planned qty  difference
    450002432   10                        1              01/10/2011    02/10/2011       1 day          100             100             0
                                                     2              02/10/2011    04/10/2011       2 days        200             400            200
                                                     3              03/10/2011    07/10/2011       4 days         300            300              0
    For the same PO when it is Finished or completed(Delivery completion indicator is set)
    PO num         item num   schedule line    Planned date   actual date  difference  actual qty  planned qty  difference
    450002432   10                        1              01/10/2011    07/10/2011       6 day          100             100             0
                                                     2              02/10/2011    07/10/2011       5 days        200             400            200
                                                                    03/10/2011    07/10/2011       4 days         300            300              0
    for all the schedule line its displaying the last posting date(i think its taking from EKKO table)
    Is there any possibility to get that posting date history ....

    You can have multiple receipts against a PO schedule line, but this extractor is not meant to go to that level of granularity.  Please try to use 2lis_02_sgr instead which provides goods receipts per PO schedule line.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Iphone 4s and 5 not syncing with Itunes

    Please someone help me. I am having the same issue with my iphone 5 and my daughters iphone 4s. We are using Windows on Asus newer laptop. We are on the most up to date versions of Windows and itunes. When you plug into computer and it connects to it

  • Foreign currency valuation (F.05)

    Hi, When i am valuating open items of vendors thru f.05 what has happened is : 1.) First time it passes the entry for the difference in the currencies. 2.) Second time it passes  the entry for the net difference i.e new diifference -old    difference

  • Duplicated entries in the Library-Runbooks section

    Hi We recently changed the URL where SCSM should read the SCO Runbooks from. However, after we initiated a new SCO connector sync, the Library is populated with duplicate entries, from both the old URL and the new URL (see the screenshot below). From

  • Posting the data manually

    Hello, we have .net and BAPI scenario in XI, we are moving to production, before that .net is posting the WSDL file manually to SAP to check the connection in test system, before that i want to enter data manually in XI to check the SAP connection. i

  • Startup disk full notification in Photoshop?

    Hi, okay, so my problem doesn't even make sense to me. My computer is fairly full, I need to put stuff into a new hard drive soon or something... but I've never ever had this problem before (and it has gotten completely full before). In photoshop I t