Chaining a disk with a monitor

Is it possible to use Thunderbolt in the following fashion? The LaCie disk of course has two Thunderbolt connectors so that it can be chained. The real question is if it will pass on the DP signal.
MacBook Air -> Thunderbolt cable -> LaCie Thunderbolt disk -> DP mini to DVI adapter -> DVI-D Monitor?
Bold = Device, Italic = cable.
The reason for the adapter is simply that i have a DVI-D KVM switch to toggle between my work box and my gaming PC.

I have a similar setup:
MacBook Air --> Thunderbolt Cable --> LaCie Thunderbolt --> mini DP to HDMI adapter --> HDMI display with sound.
The display works fine at 1920 by 1080 (1080P), but the sound does not. When connected directly
MacBook Air --> Thunderbolt Cable --> mini DP to HDMI adapter --> HDMI display with sound.
The sound works fine and can be controlled through the computer or display. I tried adding a USB speaker, which works but the system does not alwayswakes and just quits when I reboot, have to unplug everything to get it back. I also connected speakers to the audio out and the same thing happened. Now I am using Bluetooth speakers without any of the previous problems. I like the LaCie it is a 2 TB and very fast so I am living with the sound on Bluetooth.
This may help provide some information that you can use for your situation.
Steve C

Similar Messages

Using Boot Disk with external monitor?

Does anyone have any idea how to boot from the OSX install disk while using an external monitor?
My powerbook screen and HD are both busted and I can't install the OS on the new HD. I can get to the point where it has booted up and is using the external monitor as a second screen but I can't see what I'm doing! HELP!

Do you have another Mac at your disposal? If you have installed a new HD into the PB and need to put an OS on it, you could put the PB into firewire target mode and attach it as a second drive to another Mac. You can then install an OS onto it.
It might also work that, when you have the PB booted and the external monitor is acting as the second screen, close the lid and put the PB to sleep. Then, wake it up by plugging in a USB mouse or keyboard and the external screen should become the primary screen. You need to have the PB plugged into the AC adapter to perform this trick.

Please help with strange monitor/Lightroom 4 interaction problem

I bought a Dell Ultrasharp U3011 yesterday, and I'm now facing a very strange problem. It's sort of related to the common discussed issue of Lightroom's color management, but there is a twist here. I'll explain.
The monitor I had been using (and still have) was a Samsung SyncMaster 244T. I had no problems at all with it.
With the U3011, I've run into this problem:
-When I view files in Lightroom 4, the colors are muted and contrast low. The same files seen in Xnview, ACDSee Pro (with the color management turned off), Digital Photo Professional (colorspace set to sRGB), are much more vivid. In Photoshop, if I use the default color setting, it looks muted like Lightroom (I'm guessing because Adobe products have default color profile set to ProPhoto RGB), but if I set the color profile to the monitor's profile, it becomes vivid and matches the other software I mentioned. If I use any other profile such as sRGB IEC81966-2.1, ProPhoto RGB, Adobe RGB, etc, it doesn't match the other software I mentioned. This is strange because the other ones match each other because they are set to sRGB, but in Photoshop, even if I set the color profile to sRGB, it still doesn't match.
-In Lightroom 4, even if I use Soft Proofing, nothing changes. It's as if Soft Proofing is broken--it doesn't do anything, no matter what color profile I choose.
-Now, here's the twist. I didn't have any of these problems when I use the 244T. This leads me to assume that the problem is how the U3011 is interacting with Lightroom. I did a quick comparison of opening up the same image on both monitors in ACDSee Pro, and they looked identical. (At this point, I had the U3011's preset set to sRGB. This is the only preset that makes the U3011 look identical to the 244T).
Next, I did an experiment, and I was very surprised by what happened. This is what I did:
With both monitors as a dual display setup, I turned on Before/After comparison in Lightroom (made sure both version had the same setting and look identical by copying the After's setting to Before). I then moved Lightroom's window so that one photo is seen on the U3011, and the other shows up on the 244T. And OMIGOD, they looked different! Why is this happening? I've already established that the same image looks identical on both monitors when viewed with ACDSee Pro, but in Lightroom, they looked different on each monitor.
And then things got even more weird. When I dragged the Lightroom window fully to one monitor or the other, Lightroom actually started changing the colors right before my eyes as it responded to which monitor was displaying which photo! Lightroom was somehow interacting with the monitor in real-time. So if the Before looked muted on U3011 and the After looked vivid on the 244T, when I drag the whole window into 244T, the muted Before will stay muted for about a second or so, and then it'll suddenly change and become identical to After. And when I did the reverse (drag the window into U3011), the reverse also happened--the vivid After will stay vivid on U3011 for about a second or so, and then it would suddenly change and become muted. Lightroom was identifying each monitor's color profile setting and changing the images according to which monitor was doing the displaying, and when the images were split between the two monitors, Lightroom was slitting them into two different settings to match whichever monitor is displaying which side.
So what the hell does that all mean, and what can I do to get Lightroom to display the photos so that they look the same as on all the other software I mentioned (so I don't have to play the guessing game of editing the images, export them out to other software to check how they turned out). Also, remember that I didn't have this problem with the 244T--Lightroom displayed the photos the same way as the other software I mentioned. The problem right now is that the U3011 is somehow causing Lightroom to display the photos differently, and no color profile presets in the OSD control can make them match.
I need to solve this problem, or else my last resort would be to return the U3011 and try another brand/model and see if that helps.
Any ideas?

Yes, that's basically sensible advice you got there (but I was more succinct ).
An important point that was mentioned over there is that you must not confuse document/source profile with monitor profile. They are both links in the color management chain, but they serve different purposes. The document profile defines the colors in a standard color space. The monitor profile describes the monitor's own native color space - its response to the RGB numbers it's fed. So one is translated into the other, by the application on the fly, through a normal profile conversion, and that way the colors appear on-screen as intended.
If those two profiles/color spaces are roughly similar, as they would be in the case of an sRGB document displayed on a standard gamut display - then you can get by without color management. It won't look too far off. But a wide gamut monitor changes the rules, because its native color space is not similar to sRGB, it's much closer to Adobe RGB.
Anyway, this is what color management is about. Any profile can be translated into any other. So in this context it doesn't really matter what color space the document is in - as long as you have a good monitor profile it will display correctly (within practical limitations). Lightroom is a sort of special case because its internal working color space is not one of the standard ones, instead it's a modified ProPhoto space with linear gamma. But the basic principle is exactly the same: source profile > monitor profile.
Just to go a little more in-depth while I'm at it: When you calibrate a display you actually do two separate things. You first calibrate it to a more or less standardized response. But that's just a linear one-dimensional correction. It does nothing about how color is actually reproduced, how red is red for instance. The calibration is global and affects everything system-wide because it's read into the video card or monitor hardware.
Then, once calibrated, a monitor profile is made. This is a full, complete and accurate description of the monitor's behavior, in three-dimensional color space. The precision level is much higher. This profile is used, by color managed applications like Lightroom and Photoshop, to display the image.
Other applications that are not color managed will simply ignore this profile, and send the RGB numbers straight through to the display, unmodified. With a standard gamut monitor (and an sRGB document) the difference won't be too dramatic and you may not notice it unless you look closely. But a wide gamut monitor will make the difference jump out immediately.

Logical Disk Free Space Monitor - Slow to detect low free space

We are using the built in two trigger (MB and %) logical disk free space monitor in SCOM 2012 R2. We have setup overrides for MB warning and critical for both system and non-system drives and for a group containing disks we do not want monitored. The monitor
actually works fine, triggering an alert when both the MB and % free criteria are met. The problem is that it takes almost an hour for the initial alert to fire. After the initial alert, if I further fill the disk to push it from warning to critical, the alert
changes within the specifiec interval, which we have left at 15 minutes. The alert also clears using the 15 minute interval.
Has anyone else seen this behavior with this monitor? A disk monitor that takes an hour to fire is not going to be very useful.

I wanted to see for myself if there was anything else that I might be missing, so I opened up the Windows 2008 Logical Disk Free Space monitor XML and noticed that there is a NumSamples configuration that is set to 4. So, if the interval is 15 minutes, the
disk would have to exceed both threshold types for 4 consecutive intervals in order to change state and generate alert. This would be a minimum of 1 hour before an alert is raised with the default 15 minutes interval.
Unfortunately, NumSamples is not overrideable in the monitor type, which is too bad... The only way to get an alert sooner than one hour is to override interval. For example, if you want an alert within 20 minutes, override interval to 300 seconds (5 minutes).
Here is the code - see for yourself:
<UnitMonitor ID="Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.LogicalDisk.FreeSpace" Accessibility="Public" Enabled="true" Target="Server2008!Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.LogicalDisk" ParentMonitorID="SystemHealth!System.Health.AvailabilityState" Remotable="true" Priority="Normal" TypeID="Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.FreeSpace.Monitortype" ConfirmDelivery="true">
<Category>Custom</Category>
<AlertSettings AlertMessage="Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.LogicalDisk.FreeSpace.AlertMessage">
<AlertOnState>Warning</AlertOnState>
<AutoResolve>true</AutoResolve>
<AlertPriority>Normal</AlertPriority>
<AlertSeverity>MatchMonitorHealth</AlertSeverity>
<AlertParameters>
<AlertParameter1>$Target/Property[Type="Windows!Microsoft.Windows.LogicalDevice"]/DeviceID$</AlertParameter1>
<AlertParameter2>$Target/Host/Property[Type="Windows!Microsoft.Windows.Computer"]/PrincipalName$</AlertParameter2>
</AlertParameters>
</AlertSettings>
<OperationalStates>
<OperationalState ID="UnderWarningThresholds" MonitorTypeStateID="UnderWarningThresholds" HealthState="Success" />
<OperationalState ID="OverWarningUnderErrorThresholds" MonitorTypeStateID="OverWarningUnderErrorThresholds" HealthState="Warning" />
<OperationalState ID="OverErrorThresholds" MonitorTypeStateID="OverErrorThresholds" HealthState="Error" />
</OperationalStates>
<Configuration>
<ComputerName>$Target/Host/Property[Type="Windows!Microsoft.Windows.Computer"]/NetworkName$</ComputerName>
<DiskLabel>$Target/Property[Type="Windows!Microsoft.Windows.LogicalDevice"]/DeviceID$</DiskLabel>
<IntervalSeconds>900</IntervalSeconds>
<SystemDriveWarningMBytesThreshold>500</SystemDriveWarningMBytesThreshold>
<SystemDriveWarningPercentThreshold>10</SystemDriveWarningPercentThreshold>
<SystemDriveErrorMBytesThreshold>300</SystemDriveErrorMBytesThreshold>
<SystemDriveErrorPercentThreshold>5</SystemDriveErrorPercentThreshold>
<NonSystemDriveWarningMBytesThreshold>2000</NonSystemDriveWarningMBytesThreshold>
<NonSystemDriveWarningPercentThreshold>10</NonSystemDriveWarningPercentThreshold>
<NonSystemDriveErrorMBytesThreshold>1000</NonSystemDriveErrorMBytesThreshold>
<NonSystemDriveErrorPercentThreshold>5</NonSystemDriveErrorPercentThreshold>
<NumSamples>4</NumSamples>
</Configuration>
</UnitMonitor>
This proves 2 things:
1. Your testing proved that the monitor is working as designed - you got an alert in about an hour
2. This is a bad design at best, or a bug if you wish, as NumSamples should not be a hidden configuration - it should be exposed in override parameters in the console.
This should be fixed by Microsoft.
Jonathan Almquist | SCOMskills, LLC (http://scomskills.com)

Can the last link in a thunderbolt daisy-chain be a non-thunderbolt monitor using miniDisplay port?

Can the last link in a thunderbolt daisy-chain be a non-thunderbolt monitor, using miniDisplay port?
For example, Mac mini <--> external SSD <--> apple cinema display 30" (using miniDisplay port adaptor plugged into the SSD's second thunderbolt port)

TechnoMax wrote:
for instance STAE122 or STAE 127?
FWIW, STAE129 is the current version TB adapter
that is self powered and has TB daisy chain port.
STAE122 and STAE127 are older versions and
not the current model, though there may be stock of
these around. As to whether this will solve your issue,
I don't know.
Can I trick the Mac under Bootcamp as OS to use HDMI for the monitor? Dell officially says that the monitor can only accept 1900x1080 over HDMI, but some have fiddled wth different computers with custom settings that worked with some Monitors but mostly under Linux and to Dell 2711.
The MacMini HDMI port is hardware limited to 1980x1200.

Process chains in red(errors occurred), monitoring in green

Hi friends,I have same problems with the monitoring / process chains.
For exemples in the Monitor for OMAT_SALES in the tab Status I have green for Total and Technical with the message:
   Data successfully updated
   Diagnosis
   The request has been updated successfully.
   InfoSource : 0MAT_SALES
   Data type : Texts
   Source system: PRD-600
In the tab Details I have:
-the Overall status in red, error occures or missing messages
-the requests, extractions,transfers,processing-everything is Ok-green
-the Process Chains-errors occurred-red
In the transaction RSPC the infopackage for load data OMAT_SALES is red,the next infopackage in the chain is green.
What can I do to fix this problem for Process Chain in RSPC and also in Monitoring (tab Details)?
I will apreciate any answer,
Thanks,
Claudia

The next connected infopackage must be connected with Always link that's why its processed even after the failure node. Go and cross check what errors you got for the failed process, and reload it manually.

Premiere Pro CS4 - Problem with the monitor program.

Hi. I'm not able solving problems with the monitor using PremiereProCS4. When I drag a photo (also only one photo) in the timeline and play it in the monitor program, vision in the monitor program doesn't run:black monitor or a little part of the photo appear... sometimes distort colours. Asus P5QPRO, Intel 9550 and Sparkle Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX+ 1024 DDR3; last gpu driver and directX are installed. Different configuration of stratch disks were tested. Where am I wrong?

Dear Bill,
thanks for your answer and your article. I tried with your NTSC 4:3 720x480 PAR 0.9 and, "magically", no more problem!!! I used the script pocedure in Photoshop CS4 to resize my images. Now, before starting my workflow and hoping not to overuse your patience, I would like to indicate you my equipment and my target: I use a Canon Eos 7D (generally for still images, 90% are vertical, and just some videos) and I use Premiere Pro CS4 to burn a dvd (normal, 4.7 Gb or double side, more than 8 Gb) with a 16.9 lcd tv (I'm Italian); my camera save as .jpg and .raw (but why use heavy .raw files if I've to redute to 720x480?!??).
So, according to your "everyone wants the highest quality that they can obtain when doing theri videos..." and "your video project may vary, so you will need to plug in the dimensions for YOUR video project in that case", I've a question: which is the best for me?
And then:
1 - Premiere Pro CS4 havn't a batch or a script procedure for still image like PS (only for videos)!?!
2 - Premiere does'nt allow you to import images like 4.181 Kb (a too large dimension file error appears)!
3 - In the timeline of Premiere, after you dragged images, you can select them and right click to perform "resize to frame size": it seems to run good without problem, but what appen to the photo? Which is it's pixel?
4 - In the general preferences of Premiere you can to optimize rendering for "memory" or not: which is the best for you?
5 - I attached file with a screen of something strange in Premiere: dragging an image (the first of the project) in the timeline, the timeline appears distort (you can see the part in the yellow square): then, when I render the project and play in the monitor program, it becames normal.
Thanks!

MacBook Pro, 10.6.3 hangs after login with external monitor

Howdy:
This is a weird one and if this isn't the correct forum, please let me know.
I have a two year old MBP that I use 99% of the time with a 30" Apple monitor. It has always worked well. Now, if it is attached to the monitor and I log in, the machine just hangs after I put in the password. It does this also in the troubleshooting "blank" account I have. If I shut the machine down and detach the monitor and external drives, it logs me in nicely. (I'm using it now)
I have restarted from the 10.6 install disk and repaired permissions twice. I have reloaded 10.6 and then did the updatede to 10.6.3. I have used Disk Utility and TechToolPro to repair everything and both say all is okay. Still the problem persists. However, when I reloaded 10.6 and updated it, it logged me in with the monitor once and then when I logged out to restart it, it stopped again.
Could it be a problem with 10.6.3 and external monitors? I don't think so as it worked for a while with it before this started.
The only connection I can find is the monitor.
Does anyone have any clue what is going wrong and what I might do to fix it? Thanks

I need to hang my head in shame. The solution, once found was simple and took only seconds and it was merely a software conflict. I should have gotten that one myself but didn't, because, believe it or not, I didn't think the software was running and I simply forgot about it to begin with.
It turns out, I had Intego Software's Virus Barrier on my computer and it was running. I knew I had it, but thought I had disabled it because it was forever throwing a hissy fit every time my Apple TV checked in. Last week, I updated it without thinking. Apparently, that re-enabled it and it was rejecting the internal process change from the machine-wide log-in screen to the account log-in screen.
The point is I should have remembered that I had updated it and I didn't. If I had recalled the change, I would have zeroed in on that before I spent hours at the Genius Bar, befuddling everyone. On the other hand, it was nice to take my 30" monitor for a nice outing.

MacBook Pro won't stay asleep with external monitor attached. When sleep is selected from the Apple menu the computer will go to sleep only to continually wake up...go back to sleep...wake up...etc. every few seconds.

MacBook Pro won't stay asleep with external monitor attached. When sleep is selected from the Apple menu the computer will go to sleep only to continually wake up...go back to sleep...wake up...etc. every few seconds. This only happens when using the external monitor. Does anyone have any suggestions?

Mine does that too. The worst thing is when it goes to sleep, then wakes up and keeps running while the lid is closed and it is wrapped up in a case. I am afraid when the hot weather comes it is going to burn up. I am hoping Apple fixes it in the software or they may have a melted MBP to replace.
Then when I open the lid it is crashed running at fill tilt, pumping out heat to beat the band. I am forced to hold the button down and reboot.
I wiped my hard disk and reinstalled my OS, but it didn't help. I reversed my OS to 10.5.0 and it solved the DVI problem but still won't sleep. This post will probably be deleted by Apple, they did it a few days ago. I just don't know what to do, and I consider myself a real Apple expert. Just hoping you realize you are not the only one.

Blue Screen on start up with dual monitors

I have a macpro running Mac OS X 10.5.6 (9G55) when 2 monitors are hooked up to it the computer the machine Blue Screens on start up. This also occurs when the computer wakes up from a deep sleep. Currently the only work around is to just use one monitor. Ive read the posting here and on macosrumors.com, but there does not seem to be a solution, however most post are from last summer. Was this fixed at some point? Is there a solution? I also tried boot from another drive (from another macpro) with both monitors hooked up and the problem continues.
Ive also read the KB article and removed ApplicationEnchancer.bundle, but the problem continues.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1545?viewlocale=en_US
Any help would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott

Scott,
Ok here are the next things on my list, and I will start with what I think is the most valuable to the just plain fun and simple you and I would be shocked if it fixed it. I only skimmed your other post, if you feel that something I recommend is a repeat you can ignore it and I will not take any offense. Sorry If my post is a little loopy I've been up for way to long.
1) Safe Boot your mac. To do so hold shift whilst your Mac boots. Please note it will take longer to load.
Starting up into Safe Mode does several things:
1. It forces a directory check of the startup volume.
2. It loads only required kernel extensions (some of the items in /System/Library/Extensions).
3. In Mac OS X 10.3.9 or earlier, Safe Mode runs only Apple-installed startup items (such items may be installed either in /Library/StartupItems or in /System/Library/StartupItems; these are different than user-selected account login items).
4. It disables all fonts other than those in /System/Library/Fonts (Mac OS X 10.4 or later).
5. It moves to the Trash all font caches normally stored in /Library/Caches/com.apple.ATS/(uid)/ , where (uid) is a user ID number such as 501 (Mac OS X 10.4 or later).
6. It disables all startup items and login items (Mac OS X 10.4 or later).
7. Mac OS X 10.5.6 or later: A Safe Boot deletes the dynamic loader shared cache at (/var/db/dyld/). A cache with issues may cause a blue screen on startup, particularly after a Software Update. Restarting normally recreates this cache.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1564
2) Try reseting the Pram.
Resetting PRAM and NVRAM
1. Shut down the computer.
2. Locate the following keys on the keyboard: Command, Option, P, and R. You will need to hold these keys down simultaneously in step 4.
3. Turn on the computer.
4. Press and hold the Command-Option-P-R keys. You must press this key combination before the gray screen appears.
5. Hold the keys down until the computer restarts and you hear the startup sound for the second time.
6. Release the keys.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1379
3) Reset the startup Disk. Open System Preferences -> Startup Disk -> Select Mac OS X.
I'll leave you with that, please come back with your results.
Weston

Lost display resolution options when installing 10.4.6 with 20" monitor

I recently installed an upgrade using black retail DVD 10.4.6 from 10.2.8, and now i only have one option for display resolution (256 colors). The screen is gray??? I can restart using 9.2 Classic and the screen display is just fine (thousands & millions of colors). I did the disk utility and permission fix prior to and before installation. I also updated the firmware. I tried to download 10.4.8 combo update, but the license agreement can't be 'agreed to' because the button will not appear on the low resolution screen. Do i have to initialize the whole disk? The Monitor is a 20" Display (the large blue monster). Since it was working with 10.2.8 and still works under 9.2 Classic reboot, i doubt whether its a hardware problem.. Any ideas?

I wonder if it could be the Voodoo5 Dfx video card that's bn not compatible with 10.4.8?? It workds with 10.2.

How to connect my new MacBook Air to a LaCie hard disk with TIme Capsule backup from my old Imac? LaCie has USB 2.0, FireWire and eSata ports.

How can I connect my new MacBook Air to a LaCie hard disk with TIme Capsule backup from my old Imac? LaCie has USB 2.0, FireWire and eSata ports.

You can direct connect your MBA to the LaCie via USB 2 cable. If you have an Apple Airport Router you can USB connect the LaCie drive to the router and then use Airport Utility to configure it. Time Machine can access it either way.

I have several disks with many comedy routines;I want to select a few from each disk and combine them to one disk for my personal use.How?

I have several disks with many comedy routines;I want to select a few from each disk to make one single disk for my personal use.How?

Copy the routines into a new folder on your hard drive. Then burn the folder to a new blank disc using Disk Utility.

You cannot shadow a session with multiple monitors enabled in Windows Server 2008 R2

Searching through the forums (and according to KB2484290) it appears that there is no solution to this problem. We are rolling out thin clients that are using dual monitors exclusively and we were very surprised to find out that we couldn't shadow
sessions with dual monitors (which to us means that we can't shadow ANY sessions). This now completely changes our approach to managing these devices.
We are running Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 with Remote Desktop Services installed. The thin clients are running Windows Embedded Standard 7 with the latest updates / RDP client. All steps have been followed to ensure that the apropriate settings and
permissions have been set up to allow access into the session.
We tested by unchecking the RDP setting “use all my monitors for the remote session”, with that setting disabled shadowing worked
Questions:
1. KB2484290 is from Dec 2010 - It's now April 2012, is there a workaround / hotfix for this issue that will allow us to shadow sessions using the native Microsoft tools?
2. Are there any recommended alternatives (software)? Free/Paid - doesn't matter we just need something that will work. I'm sure there are a few options out there but I am looking for suggestions for what people have used in the past that worked
best for them to help us narrow down the choices.

Hi,
In my experience, so far, the workaround is Remote Assistance, Remote Assistance supports multiple monitors, and is the presently recommended solution if you need this functionality. Remote Assistance is a Windows Server Feature that must be explicitly installed
on Windows Server 2008 R2; it is already installed with the client versions of the operating system.
More information:
Remote Assistance Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753881.aspx
Remote Assistance and Resulting Internet Communication in Windows Server 2008
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc770456(v=ws.10).aspx
As far as I know, there are some third-party tools can be used as the solution, such as Teamviewer, ISL Online, etc.
Please Note: The third-party products discussed here are manufactured by companies that are independent of Microsoft. We make no warranty, implied or otherwise, regarding
these products' performance or reliability.
Regards,
Dollar Wang
Forum Support
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback
here.
Technology changes life……

I have just upgraded to Mavericks and have been using Time Machine on an external disk with Snow Leopard. Can I continue to backup with Time Machine on the same external disk or do I need a new disk since the operating system has changed?

I have just upgraded to Mavericks and have been using Time Machine on an external disk with Snow Leopard. Can I continue to backup with Time Machine on the same external disk or do I need a new disk since the operating system has changed?

Hi there,
I found that Time Machine in Mavericks will sort it all out for you. You shouldn't need to buy another backup drive, unless you have insufficient space left and can't afford to delete whats on there. It should just work fine.

Chaining a disk with a monitor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for