Change item level field (in table VEDA) in Contract (VA41)

Hi freinds,
I am creating a Contract (VA41) & I want to change the value of "Contract validity period" (VEDA-VLAUFZ) in item level.
Anyone know any exit to do that ?
I have tried user exits in MV45AFZZ, but there was no appropriate one where I could change this value.
Enhancement V45W0001 also doesnt work for me.
Thanks & Regards,
Alin

Hi Liju
Have you tried using MV45AFZZ: userexit_move_field_to_vbak or userexit_move_field_to_vbap. I guess here both VEDA and XVEDA are available.
I couldnt try myself as contract data doesnt get populated in our system.
Kind Regards
Eswar

Similar Messages

  • Dont allow to change item level data in sales order.

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement in which, users should not be allowed to change  item level data or not allowed to add any new items in sales order on a certain condition. But they should be allowed to change the header level data.
    How can i achieve this.
    Can anyone help me?

    Hi,
    Check below exit.
    MV45AFZZ and in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP.
    Here check for ur validation, If passes then CHECK variable SVBAP-TABIX. If it is 0 then item is created. If it is GT 0 then item is changed. Other way could be...
    select data from VBAP for each sales document and item in xvbpa internal table.
    If for any item u don't have data in VBAP table that means u r adding that item. So issue error message.
    *       FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP                              *
    *       This userexit can be used to move some fields into the sales  *
    *       dokument item workaerea VBAP                                  *
    *       SVBAP-TABIX = 0:  Create item                                 *
    *       SVBAP-TABIX > 0:  Change item                                 *
    *       This form is called at the end of form VBAP_FUELLEN.          *
    Thanks,
    Vinod.

  • User exit to change item level data in purchase order

    Hi,
    Can anyone let me know the user exit to change item level data in purchase order . there is a badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for this but the issue is its method process_item gets triggered only when the item is changed. My requirment is
    For purchase order document types u201CZSOu201D and u201CZCOu201D, where the purchase order is a u201CLimits Orderu201D only i.e. no materials or services on the purchase order, the print price indicator field should be set to u201Cblanku201D (unchecked).   now i cant use ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST  because process_item wont get triggered if there is no change in itemlevel data.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Probably EXIT_SAPLMEKO_002.
    hope it helps,
    Edgar

  • Change item level security using wwsbr_api.modify_item

    Hi.
    Im using wwsbr_api.modify_item for change item level security.
    Its code for change type access for item of my procedure
    l_masterid := portal30.wwsbr_api.modify_item(
    p_master_item_id => 7061,
    p_item_id => 7062,
    p_caid => 136,
    p_folder_id => 1,
    p_display_name => 'test',
    p_region_id => 5,
    p_access_level => portal30.wwsbr_api.item_access,
    p_text => 'test change item security',
    p_addnewversion => true, -- My content area have item versioning
    level is audit
    After execute my procedure access type = folder.
    I see in wwv_things table new record
    masterthingid = 7061,
    id = 7064,
    security = 'folder'
    How to change item level security programmatically?
    Thanks

    Jerry,
    Please forgive me for persisting with this, and thankyou for your continued patience, but let me try to explain the issue I'm having in another way...
    I have a function that calls wwsbr_api.modify_item to change, say, the description. In this case "description" is the one and only thing I want to change about the item. As you've described above, I am able to query most things associated with the item (via wwsbr_all_items, wwsec_api.grantee_list, etc) so that I can pass current values to the wwsbr_api.modify parameters. However, I haven't found a way to query the current level of access control for a given item (i.e. wether it is currently set to ITEM_ACCESS, FOLDER_ACCESS, or null). As documented, I can force the item to be ITEM_ACCESS or FOLDER_ACCESS. However, I don't want to force a value and as we have concluded, passing null will nullify the current state.
    So, in summary, an answer to this question will solve my problem:
    Is it possible to query the current access control level of an item (either directly via one of the published views or indirectly via one of the views)?
    If the answer is yes - great that solves my problem. How please?!?!?
    If the answer is no - this must be a bug is it would mean that it isn't possible to use wwsbr_api.modify_item without inadvertently altering the current access control level of the item.
    Again thanks for your patience...
    Mark

  • Help - User exit to change item level data in Purchase Order

    Hi,
    Can anyone let me know the user exit to change item level data in purchase order . there is a badi ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST for this but the issue is its method process_item gets triggered only when the item is changed. My requirement is For purchase order document types u201CZSOu201D and u201CZCOu201D, where the purchase order is a u201CLimits Orderu201D only i.e. no materials or services on the purchase order, the print price indicator field should be set to u201Cblanku201D (unchecked).   now i cant use ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST  because process_item wont get triggered if there is no change in item level data.
    Thanks,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Probably EXIT_SAPLMEKO_002.
    hope it helps,
    Edgar

  • Best Practice: Dynamically changing Item-Level permissions?

    Hi all,
    Can you share your opinion on the best practice for Dynamically changing item permissions?
    For example, given this scenario:
    Item Creator can create an initial item.
    After item creator creates, the item becomes read-only for him. Other users can create, but they can only see their own entries (Created by).
    At any point in time, other users can be given Read access (or any other access) by an Administrator to a specific item.
    The item is then given edit permission to a Reviewer and Approver. Reviewers can only edit, and Approvers can only approve.
    After the item has been reviewed, the item becomes read-only to everyone.
    I read that there is only a specific number of unique permissions for a List / Library before performance issues start to set in. Given the requirements above, it looks like item-level permission is unavoidable.
    Do you have certain ideas how best to go with this?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to change item level permission.
    There is no out of the box way to accomplish this with SharePoint.               
    You can create a custom permission level using Visual Studio to allow users to add & view items, but not edit permission.   
    Then create a group with the custom permission level. The users in this group would have the permission of create & add permission, but they could no edit the item.
    In the CodePlex, there is a custom workflow activities, but by default it only have four permission level:
    Full Control , Design ,Contribute and Read.
    You should also customize some permission levels for your scenario. 
    What’s more, when use the SharePoint 2013 designer, you should only use the 2010 platform to create the workflow using this activities,
    https://spdactivities.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Grant%20Permission%20on%20Item
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Workflow for Changing Item Level Permission in SharePoint 2013 (Office365)

    I am using OOTB Tasks List in SharePoint 2013 (O365). Now my scenario is like this:
    I have two user groups: 1.Sales Managers 2. Sales Executives
    Sales Managers can create & assign task to Executive.  I want something like Sales Managers Can view all tasks (Which is by default view of tasks list i.e. perfact) but Executives can see only their tasks assigned to them. How can I achive this?
    Can I use WorkFlow for this to Change item level permission or to assign permission to assigned to user? or JS
    Can anyone have proper solution? thanks

    1. make 2 SharePoint group 1>Sales Managers 2>Sales Executives
    2. Show 2 WP of same task list in same page.
    3. Use Audience Target for Sales Managers Sharepoint group in first Webpart property. (All
    Iten view)
    4. Show "My Task" view (assign to =[Me]) Bottom WP for same task list and use Audience Target for Sales Executives. Or if you want it to see
    Sales Managers as well, the dont use any Audience Target.
    Bottom line - SharePoint group use in Audience Target will do the trick. OOTB
    Regards Sudip Misra [email protected] +1-412-237-5435 Pittsburgh, PA

  • Display of Item Level Fields in Complaint Search Result

    Hi,
    We have enhanced the complaint search result screen to display columns such as item category or code group. These values come from the item level, so the result list displays blanks under these columns. Is it possible to populate these fields? Something like, displaying multiple rows for the same complaint, with different values for item level fields in each row?
    For example, there is a complaint with 3 items. The user searches for complaints based on some header field, and this complaint is in the result list. Is it possible to display 3 different rows for the same complaint, with the value for Item Category being different for the 3 rows?

    Hi,
    Yes, this is possible but it a custom development.
    We had similar requirement where we needed to search all searvice orders and complaints belonging to an item category.
    We created a Z-search component for this and implemented the logic .
    If the complaint search component has item category as a search parameter ( i am not sure) then it will be simple...but it is doesnt have it, then u can include it programatically or using AET ( if you are on 7.0) .
    The result population will be programatic as you will have to search complaints matching to your item category.
    There are large no of item categories per transaction type, so dynamic search takes too much time and times out on web ui..You must supply atleas one valid item category as the basis for your search.
    Thanks & regards,
    Suchita

  • Make Item level field Non-Editable in VA01

    Dear Experts,
            I have a requirment to make ITEM Category field in item level of VA01
            make Non-editable based on the value of Sale order Type in the main screen
      i am using Program MV45AFZZ to make necessary changes i am able change any thing on the header level but i am not geting the control of item level Please suggest me how to change or make fields non-editable in Item level.

    Hi,
    Try writing code in FORM userexit_field_modification.
    *** Lock field pricing date in SO if delivery occured
      IF   screen-name = 'VBAP-PSTYV'  AND
           sy-tcode NE 'VA01' AND l VBAK-AUART EQ 'your document type'.
          screen-input = 0.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION
    KR Jaideep,

  • Adding item level field to field catalog for a PPF for Outbound Delivery

    Hi,
    We wish to send a method call to an external system at the time of PGI of the Outbound Delivery Order for the combination of Product/Ship To combination.
    Since Product is at item level and not in the standard field catalog, I added it to the field catalog in config, defined a new condition table, access sequence, condition type and maintained it in the right Procedure/Maintenance Group (Outbound Delivery).
    Then I defined a new Action Definition, with a new method to send the details to the external system, but am confused on what Schedule Condition I should assign to this Action Definition. If I use standard Outbound Delivery Printing Schedule Condition /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF only triggers when I use the standard condition type 0DDN with the standard Access Sequence (no Product available). However if I use the new condition type (with product) with the same Schedule condition: /SCWM/FDO_PRINT, the PPF does not get triggered. The log in SLG1 simply says Condition is not fulfilled.
    Can you please suggest
    Do I need to work with my developer on building a new schedule condition which would look at the new condition technique I have condition records for? Or is there a non ABAP way of making this work?
    Lastly, if my ODO has 5 items with only 2 products which have condition record, I want the PPF to be triggered 2 times for that Outbound Delivery.

    Hi Experts,
    Any update on the above request?

  • SRM 7.0 item level field in PO screen

    Hi all,
    We have a requirement to add  a field for "Shipping instructions" in SRM just like it appears in ECC PO at the item level.
    I currently dont have access to SRM 7.0 system.
    Can someone confirm if there is a std field for "Shipping instrucions" in SRM 7.0 just like in ECC?
    If not,has anyone implemented a custom solution for such a field.If so,how?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    Its possible to add new texts through customizing - standard SRM provides by default some notes like Internal note, Vendor note etc.
    We could create our own text, assign these texts to text schema and then assign text schema to transaction type (SHC for shopping cart). This can be done through customizing and then this new text type will comeup for item.
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Screen BADI for MIRO/FB60 item level field addition

    Hi,
    I need to add 'Material Group" (MATKL) field in item level similar GL Account. Material group will appear like GL account column in FB60/ MIRO screen ( GL posting).
    I want to do without modification with help screen BADI.
    Anyone, can suggest which BADI's method / User Exit can allow to add 'MATKL' field screen?
    regards,
    Rahul Mandale

    Dear Rahul,
    Please check IMG path :
    Material management>Logistic Invoice verification>incoming invoice-->Maintain item list variant.
    Or use Tcode SHD0, enter transaction Code MIRO and create  a screen variant.
    You can create your own screen variant , Untick the invisible check box for material group.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Search help for Custom Item level field

    Hi All,
    I have two custom fields at Item level. Both of them has fixed values defined at domain. The fixed values have a short text also given with them.
    The problem I am facing is when SRM provides default search help for these custom fields, for first field the 'Value' and 'Description' comes in the search result screen, but for second, only 'Value' comes in the search result.
    When I try to debug, it shows the SHLPTYPE as 'SH' for first one and for the second as 'FV'.
    What does this indicate?
    My requirement is to display both value and description in the search result screen.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks
    Nandalal

    Hi
    Sorry for the delay. My User got locked for some time.
    I have seen the document you sent me on my email id.
    <b> I noticed in the case where the Search help is working fine, there is no space in between the contents of the Fixed values and their short text under the value range tab of the Domain element.
    But in the case, where there is a problem with the search help. There both the Fixed values and their short description is having a space in between the words.
    Try maintaining COND_A instead of "COND A". Also with the short description use "COND_A" instead of "COND A".</b>
    <u>I hope this will resolve the issue.</u>
    <b>Update me once you have any issues.</b>
    Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Workflow not triggering when changing Item-level Permissions in Sharepoint 2013 list

    Scenario:
    We have a custom list in Sharepoint 2013 that we use for Case Management. We have a workflow that triggers on a created item generated from an email. The user then gets a reply with a link to his own case.
    I want the users only to be able to see their own cases and no one elses.  When I change this under
    Advanced Settings under List Settings and
    Item-level Permissions and set them to Read items that were created by the user
    and Create items and edit items that were created by the user
    the workflow doesn´t trigger.
    How can I resolve this? I've tried every possible out-of-the-box permissions but with no result. Help!
    Thanks in advance!
    // Browncreek

    When you're testing , remember you cant trigger declarative workflow from the System Account - you need a general user account for auto-trigger workflows.  Good luck!
    Chris McNulty MCSE/MCTS/MSA/MVTSP | blog http://www.chrismcnulty.net/blog | twitter @cmcnulty2000 Microsoft Community Contributor Award 2011
    Hi, I have the same problem. Except that I am not using an email to create a new item. The item is created by members of a SharePoint group that have Contribute access to the list. When use the same settings i.e.
    Read items that were created by the user and Create items and edit items that were created by the user,
    the workflow does not trigger. If I set it back to Real all items and Create
    and Edit all items, it triggers the workflow.
    Please help me resolve as I have rolled this out to pilot users and am having this trouble.
    Thanks,
    Vishal

  • SRM catalog setting to make items level field vissible.

    Hi
    I am dealing with SRM catalog activitities . I want to know the setting by which we make the field visible on portal at item level.
    rgds
    amarendra

    Hello amarendra,
    which field are you talking about ?
    The one to access to catalog?
    If yes, you have to maintain Web Service value for CAT attribute.
    Regards.
    Laurent.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Process Order Warning Message while doing the Goods Receipt

    Dear All, While doing the GR against process order via t.code MB31, we are getting a warning message which reads u201CProduction date of bch 110420 (17.06.2011) does not match the prod. date entered (26.08.2011)u201D this happens only if the batch nu

  • Up-to-date contacts on iPhone and MobileMe won't won't update the Mac

    Hi, I just got an iPhone GS and there's a glitch that's driving me mad. (I had an iPod Touch before this so it's not all new.) First of all I had duplicate Calendars and Contacts ("On my Mac" and MobileMe) so deleted those on my mac by following the

  • Problem Displaying image from blob

    Hi all, I m using, Database : 10g Rel 2 Frontend : DevSuite 10g OS : WinXp Browser : IE 6 Problem : In my forms i m displaying images from blob column but some of the images are not displayed. I have tried with all image formats available in combinat

  • WEBUTIL_FILE_TRANSFER.getMaxTransfer will not work

    oracle.forms.webutil.file Transfer.File Transfer bean not found. WEBUTIL_FILE_TRANSFER.getMaxTransfer will not work. while loading image from client machine through foms 10g in a three tier environement ,i am getting this error.can anyone help me wit

  • Multiple DML Processes On Same Table

    Would it be possible to do multiple DML operations on a single table, in Oracle 11.2.0.3.0 version of database sitting on Linux. I want to implement 2 or more parallel processes writing data into the same table at same time and the data written by ea