Change Key Fig. on a aggregated level alowed ?

Hello Gurus,
is it possible to change Key Figures on a aggregated Level ?
THNX

Hi.
What do you exactly mean ?
You can add/remove KF from aggregation levels (KF should exist in infocube).
You cant change KF in aggr level (I mean you can't change length or other properties of IO via aggr level).
Regards.

Similar Messages

DP Local Key Figure Discrepancy between Aggregated level and lowest level

Dear,
Here is my issue.
Forecast (key figure)
Life Cycle Factor (key figure)
Final Forecast (Local Key figure)
Final forecast = Forecast * (1- LCF (%) )
Example :
Product 1 = 100
Product 2 = 200
Product 3 = 300
TOTAL FORECAST = 600
If I assign a life cyle factor to Product 1 = 60
Total LCF appears = 20 (60 + 0 + 0) => OK
Final Forecast Product 1 = 40        => OK
Final Forecast Product 2 = 200      => OK
Final Forecast Product 3 = 300      => OK
Total Final Forecast = 480 (600 * (1-20%)        => NOK
I have a very strange situation because at the product level, the formula is OK   => Final Forecast = Forecast * (1 - LCF(%) )
BUT Total Final Forecast should be the sum of the each product Final forecast = 40 + 200 +300 = 540.
Can you help me to understand what I have to correct for this aggregation ?
Thanks a lot for your help
PE

Hi Arnaud,
My macro is running "interactively" because it is placed into the Default basket of my planning book.
(macro executed for each save / change)
I agree, calculation is done at each level.
Here is the parameters of the macro... should I change something ?
Thanks for your help
Pierre

Change multiprovider which is assigned to aggregation level

Hi guys,
is there a easy way to change multiprovider which is assigned to aggregation level?
We have already some queries, filters and functions on the aggregation level. So we cant simply delete it and create another one. I just want to change multiprovider definition under the aggregation level as we decided to change naming convention for multiproviders.
Thanks in advance.
Zafer

Hi,
Aggregation levels are built on top of specific multiprovider. And you can not change the technical name of multiprovider.
But you can try following approach,
1) Create copy of current multiprovider, and then create aggregation level on top of that multiprovider.
2) Now try to copy the queries from source aggregation level to target using 'RSZC' transaction.
I am not sure whether this will work or not, but you can just give a try.
Regards,
Durgesh.

How data update when there is two planning cubes in one aggregation level

If we have two planning cubes and a multi-cube includes these two planning cubes.
then we have the aggregation level defined based on this multi-cube.
if the characteristics and key figures defined in aggregation level all are included in these two planning cubes. When we plan the data with plan query based on this aggregation level, which plan cube will be updated with plan data, or both of them?

HI Wang,
yes as Bindu said you need to restrict the layout based on the infoprovider.
Lets assume that we have a multi provider M1 and it has two planning cubes cube1 and cube1.
in case u develop a layout for updating cube 1 give the restriction in the filter section as infoprovider = cube1.
or the vice versa.
Else ur layout must input values for both the cubes simultaneously, then in that case create two restricted KF with each having a restriction for cube1 and cube 2.
so wen the user enters value for the first restricted KF it will get saved in cube1 and wen he enters value for the second restricted KF it will gets saved in cube2.
This is how it works. Guess this was useful to u.
Regards.
Shafi.

Access on aggregated levels with virtual key figures

Hi all,
I need access to the aggregated view of a BEx report within user-exit RSR00002 for processing virtual key figures. Currently I only get access to the lowest non-aggregated level.
My requirements in detail:
I get certain key-figures (250 historical values)on the lowest aggregation level - so-called folders. Then I have to aggregate this vector of values at the next hierarchy level up to the top-level, say along-side a company's business department structure. Drill-down, slice&dice should be possible. So far so good - this is done easily with standard BEx features.
Then, on each aggregation level, i.e. hierarchy node, I need to get the third lowest of the 250 aggregated values to assign this to my vkf. This is not an issue of the algorithm but of the internal data representation or access to the OLAP processor because I don't get this vector on the same aggregated level such as I could see it in my BEx report but on the lowest non-aggregated folder level.
The question is now:
a. Is data access on aggregated levels and drill-downs because of the internal representation generally not possible within this user-exit and would I have to supply the aggragation logic myself or
b. do I have overlooked something critical - did I miss the trick?
Every idea or hint is deeply welcome!!
Thanks a lot,
Michael
Message was edited by: Michael Kronenberger

First check in Technical Information in RSRT , whether the
Virtual Char/Key Fig is Y or N.

Aggregation level ZFI_FINGL is locked by the Change and Transport Organizer

Dear,
After transport from a dev to prod system I get this message on the planning modeler :
"System is not set to changeable - objects are not changeable
Aggregation level ZFI_FINGL is locked by the Change and Transport Organizer"
Do you know how to fix it ?
Thanks in advance,
Thibaut

Hi,
By default the planning modeller configuration is added to the standard BEx transport (if it is not saved in $TMP). If there is not one set up then create one in the admin workbench transport connection.
If you don't use this, then you can add the objects you wish to change manually into a transport before you change them - this also works.
Cheers
Mark

Aggregation level is locked by the Change and Transport Organizer

Dear All,
I have created aggregation level in the planning cube and transported to Production from dev, Once i transported to production i am not able to change the aggregation level in Dev, and also aggregation level is Inactive. Aggregation level YPNC2 is locked by the Change and Transport Organizer. Please suggest how to activate the aggregation level in Dev.
Thanks
Christopher

Hi,
Kindly check the following,
1. Is your aggregation level transported properly to the production system ?
2. Was your aggregation level active while you were including it in the transport request ?
3. Did you properly include the aggregation level in the request?
If you find that the answers of all the above questions is "YES", then there should not be any problem in your aggregation level.
Hope this solves your issue, if not kindly get back to me.
Regards,
Balajee

Values are aggregated at query end hence key fig gives incorrect output

Hi expert,
Support team have faced the issue at query level. The system is migrated from 3.5 to 7.0.
We have 3 key fig as A1, A2, A3 and it contains zero as well as non-zero values.
We need to ignore zero values and only non-zero values should be considered to calculate the KF.
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.

Amar,
It's ok supress and delete the records which have zero KF values.
there is no purpose in having them in the cube if you don't use them for the reporting (cumulation of the all the records)
as far the facts are empty in the report, neither they help in decision making nor they add any significance.
So why just have the data for characteristics which doesn't have facts (key figure values). use Zero elimination technique as i said.
it will also reduce the datavolume in the cube.
Regards,
Sudheer.

Sum of Key fig at Universe level

Hi, I have created a Universe on the Top of SAP BW Cube.
I have 5 Key fig in the Key fig class.
My question -
1. Can i create a new key fig which contains the sum(Salary) , Assuming salary is the key fig exist in Universe.
2. What will be the syntex for the same.
Thanks

Hi,
take a look here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0a45246-ce76-2b10-e688-f5c8206203eb
Keep in mind that when you connect to the cube directly you will lose the following:
- navigational attributes
- restricted keyfigures
- calculated keyfigures
- variables
>> including authorization variables.
Ingo

DP Disaggregation and Aggregation levels

Hi all,
I have a question regarding disaggregation and aggregation levels.
KFu2019s and disaggregation setup:
KF001:
Calculation type: I (not relevant)
Disag. Key Fig.: KF000 (not relevant)
Time-Based Disaggregation: K (not relevant)
Time-Based Disag. Key Figure: (not relevant)
KF002:
Calculation type: I
Disag. Key Fig.: Keyfigure001
Time-Based Disaggregation: P
We are now interested on the KF002. KF002u2019s disaggregation is based on KF001. I am trying to copy KF001 values to KF002 with a macro that is attached to a background job. Macro doesnu2019t do anything else than copy values from KF001 to KF002.
Background job setup:
Selection:
Sales organization: 2000AB
Location: 1000EF
Product: 1 to 2000 (consists 2000 products, including products that do not belong to above location)
Excluded values:
Customer group 1: 2500AB
Aggregation level:
Sales organization
Location
Product
Customer group 1
What I try to accomplish (through background job - mass processing):
I am trying to copy values with above setup so that the most detailed level which is Customer group 2 would have values through disaggregation. I have successfully copied values to product level, location level, sales organization level but the customer group 2 level values are not as KF001u2019s. Values are right in the SUM level, but not disaggregated right to customer group 2 level.
I get right results when I choose Customer group 2 to the aggregation level but this is not something we can do as it causes way too long runtimes. What I am also interested in is that how come the disaggregation does not work properly or does it? How can I get the disaggregation work so that I only have to select the aggregation levels which are defined in the selection and get proper results through disaggregation to customer group 2 level?
Thanks in advance,
Juha

Hello Juha,
You do not need another macro, just make the above change to your original one, and the macro should work.
Your aggregation level in the job should also be OK.
Since you mentioned that the values at detailed level are not the same as key figure 1, it sounds to me that the system did a pro rata disaggregation. Do you have the key figure 2 totally cleared out before copy? Since you're using disaggregation type 'I', it only disaggregates based on another key figure when the key figure value is initial.
So my suggestion is, you can try to change the key figure's disaggregation tyep to 'P' and check if the macro works.
Or if you have to use type 'I', you should add a step in the macro before the copy step, to initialize key figure 2 first.
To initialize a key figure, just put the row in the step, and for the 'Change Mode', select 'Initialization'.
Best Regards,
Ada

Setting aggregation level in POSDM

Hi experts
I would like to consult from you regarding SAP standard function on aggregation level to be set in POSDM.
The requirement I get is to aggregate sales in the level of day/store/article/promotion ID.
Are there any solution to this in terms of configuration?
Really appreciate your help.
BR
Dominic

Hi,
Aggregation Method plays a key role in terms of One-Step Processing Tasks.For eg.,if you want to Generate WPUTAB Idoc and there is an aggregation Method code which is specifically available to have the aggregation done based on the means of payment.
SImilarly you can have aggregation method based on material,by sales item and qualifier and also with material&Conditions combination.
You can see the difference when you choose 0000 - Code for Aggregation method for Task code 0013 - Generate Idoc WPUTAB and process.Later on change the Code for Aggregation Method to 0005 and you can see if in POS Workbench also.
NOTE : You can also custom specific Aggregation Method - for eg, Aggregation should be done based on transaction type/sales item type etc.
Thanks and Regards,
Ramesh D

Aggregation level and planning filter question

Hi,
I have below questions on aggregation levels and planning fitlers.
Scenario: An Aggregation level is built on a multiprovider( Actual Cub1(5 chars, 4 keyfig), Actual Cube2(8 chars, 6 key fig), and Real Time Cube3(8 chars and 3 keyfig)). A FOX copy function has to be built on this aggregation level in which data from cube1 will be copied to cube 3.
1. Does an Aggregation level need to have all chars and keyfigures from cube 1 and cube 3? or it should have structure of Cube 3 only as data will be written to cube 3?
- what are the standard design considerations for defining aggregation level?
2. In planning filter, both cube1 and cube3 are to be restricted or only cube3?
Is it necessary that only target planning cube is to be resricted? In that case how function will get the source data from cube1?
- what are the standard design considerations for defining planning filter?
Please provide some info on this...
any document on design consderations for planning object will be great.
Thanks,
Pundari.

Please go thru the following link u will find step by step procedure for IP:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0568315-7727-2d10-d4ba-88ab69e16577?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Please provide ur valuable points if it is helpful:)
Regards,
Prasad.

Aggregation level

Dear Experts
I have 2 restricted key figures both set with aggregation level Total with reference to a characteristic. both are with reference to different characteristics. KF 1 is a formula containing KF 2 .
So, the referred characteristics are Char 1 for KF 1 and Char 2 for KF 2.
In the rows, if I drill down further by chars other than char 1 and char 2, how will the KF 1 and KF 2 values be affected?
Am i right to say drill down will not affect the aggregation behavior?
What determines which chars to be referred to when setting aggregation level in the KF?
Thanks in advance.
regards
Pascal

Hi Pascal,
Can i ask you to paste your report requirement so that we can visualize in a better way and guide you on the same.
Regards,
AL

Aggregation level doesnt support non-cumulative kf

hello
IP planer generates an error "Infoobject 0AMOUNT (version A) is not compunded" when I include non-cumulative kf into aggregation level of infoprovider.
KF ZAMOUNT is non-cumulative and depends on 0AMOUNT. Both kf are active.
I need non-cumulative kf just for informative purposes, i dont want to plan with this kf.
Does anyone know is it possible to use non-cumulative kf in aggregation level of multicube?

Hi,
no non-kumulative key figures are not supported in aggregation levels.
But one can use a MultiProvider on the cube with the non-cumulative key figure. Create an aggregation level for the objects you want to plan and use this aggregation level also in the MultiProvider. Then you can integrate the 'plan objects' and the non-cumulative key figure in a query defined on the MultiProvider.
Regards,
Gregor

Add new key figs or characteristics and "Repair full request"

Hi Gurus, here are my questions
1.If I add new key figs or characteristics(which are not Key fields) to ODS and Cube containing tons of data, Will the transport for structure changes fail due to presence of data?
2.The extractor to the ODS which inturn is feeding the cube, is delta enabled. So the newly added objects wont have entries for historical records. If I change this extractor to "Repair full request" after adding the new fields, will the new fields then get populated?
3. After the "Repair Full Request" activity, Can I change the Infopackage setting back to delta update mode?
Thanks for the help in advance!!
Simmi

Hello Simmi,
1. Transport should go fine. As you are not changing the key fields, it should not cause any problem even if data is present.
2. Yes. But make sure what data you want to laod. As with full repair, system is not going to check for duplicate data. The responsibility lies with you.
3. Sure. if you mark the full load as repair, the delta settings will be unaffected.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Praveen

Change Key Fig. on a aggregated level alowed ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for