Change of Source Structure for Partial Settled WBS elements - CJ02

Hi
As per standard SAP, the change of source structure under settlement perameters of WBS element is not supported when the settlement of WBS element is done either partial / full.
However, the client needs this change by doing any Z-Development as one time activity (since the source structure was changed for certain WBS elements as per change in business process).
Can i Know procedure to do the Z development to modify the source structure for partial settled WBS elements and also let me know the any side effects in this regard.
Regards
Anil

Hi Anil,
I agree with Ajay. You can try to change it in Debugging mode.
The values are handed over from include LCJWBF5Q (form project_settle_single using)
Some customer have also made a modification as a permanent solution.
Unfortunately in the standard it is not possible.
regards Bernhard

Similar Messages

Settlement Status-05 (Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement)

Hi all,
If we execute the report CJID, we see the settlement status 05(Dist. rule group specfied for partial settlement).
My query is what does settlement status 05 exactly means.
Regards,
Gagandeep Singh

HI gagandeep singh,
settlement status 05 could be your allocation structure.
or else can you explain more abt your query
vengaiah chowdary

User exit M06B0002 Changes to comm. structure for purchase requi

Hi Folks,
Do any of you fine guys if there is a note to implement to get the same tables available in "M06B0002 Changes to comm. structure for purchase requisition release" as you have in "M06B0005 Changes to comm. structure for overall release of requisn. "?
In M06B0005 you have:
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*"       IMPORTING
*"             VALUE(I_CEBAN) LIKE CEBAN STRUCTURE CEBAN
*"       EXPORTING
*"             VALUE(E_CEBAN) LIKE CEBAN STRUCTURE CEBAN
*"       TABLES
*"              C_EBAN STRUCTURE EBAN
*"              C_EBKN STRUCTURE EBKN
but in M06B0002 you only have:
""Lokale Schnittstelle:
*"       IMPORTING
*"             VALUE(I_CEBAN) LIKE CEBAN STRUCTURE CEBAN
*"       EXPORTING
*"             VALUE(E_CEBAN) LIKE CEBAN STRUCTURE CEBAN
I find this a little bit odd???
Thanks in advance,
Thomas

Hi,
Are there any custom defined characteristics for your release strategy ? SAP gives you certain characteristics like Purchase Order value, material group etc on which Release strategy can be determined but other than SAP defined fields if you want some other fields then you need to pass the value for this particular field in your exit.
Also if you are using this exit , are you passing the values to the export structure e_cekko ? You can use :
move-corresponding i_cekko to e_cekko.
One more point is if you have custom defined fields for your exit then that has to be also passed to c_ekko.
The important point here is that if you are using this exit then all the characteristics that you have defined in config for release strategy determination has to be passed to the export structure.If any of them is blank then release strategy will not be determined.
Pravat.

Result Analysis with transaction code KKAJ for Top level WBS element

Hi Experts,
we have four level WBS structure with level 1 and level 4 with all operative indicators active
when we are doing Result analysis by using KKAJ for level 1 WBS element, System is taking all level 4 wbs elements also into consideration.
Is there a way to run results analysis using KKAJ only for level 1 wbs elements for multiple projects, avoiding the level 4 WBS elements.
SAP version 4.6C
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance
Chakravarthy

Hi
refer this thread posted a few days back
Ajay M

How to change Investment program position assignd to a wbs element

Hi all,
Could you please help me to find out which bapi can do necesary changes for a particular wbs element like investment program position and year.
The Investment position and year can be showed in cj02 transaction for a particular wbs element.
Thanks in advance,
Sourya Prakash.

Hi,
You can use BAPI_PROJECTDEF_GETDETAIL to get relevant details. If that does not serve, you can go through the list available on this link ---
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/HowtouseBAPIinProjectSystem+Module
Thanks.
Kumar Saurav.

PO number and PO qunatity for a given WBS element

hello all,
in which table does PO number and PO quantity are stored for a given WBS element...
or do i need to use any function module....
i need to use it in an ALV report...
thanks in advance.....

For service PO's or material PO's you can get only by using PR reference.
for material you will be having only one PR for One material so there is no problem with Materials.
for ref find the below screenshot
for services number of activities comes under single PR so this is some critical to bring the datafor ref find below screenshot
as mentioned in the screenshot all the service numbers will come under PR 40 line item so by using PR 40 you will be creating PO ,
Pass order(NPLNR)/W.B.S.E(PS_PSP_PNR) in EBKN get BANFN & BNFPO pass this in EKPO for service PO's package number (PACKNO) will be updated by using this go to ESLL pass package number(PACKNO) and take package (SUB_PACKNO) and pass in package number(PACKNO) you will get the service items for that PO
Regards
Ambarish

How to capture the different sold-to party for a single WBS Element

Hello,
The client wants to automatically populate the Partner field in the WBSE. The Sold-to party that is indicated in the Sales Order will be the same with the Partner Field in the WBSE. I would like to ask regarding on how can we capture the different sold-to party for a single wbs element, since in our project there is a system constraint where it is not possible to have multiple u2018sold tou2019 rows assigned to partner field in the WBSE.
Hoping for your suggestions and comments. Thanks in advance.
- Irica
Edited by: Irica Vaile Dalisay on May 25, 2011 3:45 PM

Try using the Customer Enhancement

How to change the source type for a primary key on a form?

Hi,
At the time of creating a form, I had set the source type for the primary key to an existing sequence.
Now I want to change the source to a trigger.
Can anyone suggest how to do it?
Thanks in advance,
Annie

Annie:
Define the trigger and then delete the page process named 'Get PK'
Varad

How to change the source system for just a datasource

Hi,
Our test/development BI system ( BI 7.0 Unicode ) is connected to our development system and to our test system, 1 BI system connected to 2 R/3 systems.
During some time, the test system won't be available so all datasources that point to the test system must be connected to the development system. In RSA1 is not possible to change the source system in a datasource: RSDS 057
'Creation of DataSources for SAP source system D30CLNT007 is not permitted' , same error trying to copy the datasource,.
Any idea about how to proceed ?
Regards,
Joan

Hi,
If I try to repliclate metadata in the datasource, message RSAR 051 appears: 'error when opening an RFC connection'. This error is expected because the logical system pointed in the datasource does not exist.
Is not possible to change the source system in datasource ( in RSA1 ) because the field is always greyed, also if I try to copy the datasource the message RSDS 057 appears.
Any idea about how to proceed ?
Regards,
Joan

Making Settlement rule mandatory for creating any WBS element

Hello All,
We have an requirement that system should not allow us to save any WBS element until the settlement rule is maintained.
This we want only for WBS elements where Investment rule is not assigned.
Can alyone help me to find out if this is possible, if yes then how.
Points Assured.
Thanks & Regards,
Jatinder Bansal

Hi,
The only way it seems possible is using exists in validations.
if not try to check the status of the wbs element in a validation. function module is STATUS_CHECK. and i think the system might set a special status, if a settlement rule has been maintained for a wbs element.
Rgds
Sudhir Reddy

Vendor Rebate for Partial Settlement

Hi gurus,
I need your help, I am new with some part of the Rebate process and this is my case. I have a rebate agreement where the validity date is 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
We have many POs, GRs and IVs for the Vendor assigned to this agreement and the rebate agreement have one condition record with many discounts (like 10) with the validity date 01.01.2009 to 31.12.2009.
I can see the POs where the discount was applied.
The situation is that I want to execute the partial settlement for this agreement FOR today, transaction MER4.
Then, in the "Settlement date" field I have selected = 31.03.2009 and
I have the option "Perform settlement accounting" selected too (it is in the Control data:settlement run section).
But, the system is telling me "No rebate arrangement chosen" and I know that I have Invoice Verifications made, why I cannot do a partial settlement?
Could you help me please?
Kind regards,
SP
Edited by: SANDRA PALOMO on May 3, 2011 2:41 PM

Sandra,
I know this post is closed but seems like you worked on Vendor Rebate Process.I am working on this first time.I have following scenario
I have one vendor for which we like to have vendor rebate for some specific materials.. The rebate is 10% of purchases, accrued monthly, receive quarterly and we like the moving average price should be reduced by the 10% rebate.
Can you please give me some guidance ?

Unable to Settle WBS element- Message No. KD559..

Hi,
I am trying to settle a WBS element. I have maintained the settlement rule through CJIC.
Now when I am trying to settle it through CJ88 I get a message:
Message no. KD559
Diagnosis
You are trying to use a settlement amount rule to settle an amount larger than the amount currently available.
Note that it is not appropriate to assign several line items to the same distribution rule group if you wish to settle line items. The system..
uses the distribution rule group for each line item,
meaning that the total settled amount would be the same as the total of the amounts from the distribution rules,
multiplied by the number of line items.
System Response
The system does not allow the settlement.
Procedure
Check your settlement rules.
I had gone through the details I found that this is due to a negative amount maintained in the settlement rule for one receiver. I want this negative amount in the settlement rule. (The total amount of settlement rule equals the postings to the WBS)
My question stands what should I do so that it will be possible for me to settle the WBS element.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Prasad
Edited by: Prasad Wathare on Apr 12, 2011 2:03 PM

Hi Medha,
Due to Month End Activity I have changed the rule and tried to settle and it worked, but I will be glad to know the reason why this happens?
Thanks i advance.
Regards,
Prasad A. Wathare.

How to change the Data Foundation for an existing Business Element

My Issue:
I have quite a few reports that use the same Business View. The Business View has an under lying Data Foundation that uses a Dynamic Data Connection (DDC). I no longer want to use this DDC because production users are complaining they do not want to have to select a data source each time (multiple times when the report includes sub reports) they run/refresh their reports.
The Holy Grail:
I would like to change the Data Foundation that my Business Element layer is built upon and use another data foundation with identical tables, linking, and fields. The new data foundation would be using a production connection. This solves my immediate issue and has a great side benefit of providing a convenient way to promote reports from development to stage/test, to production and would not require production users to have to select which environment they want their report to run against.
I am logged in to BVM as administrator:
When I look at the Business Element layer Property Browser, I see a Data Foundation Property but is is disabled (such that it can not be changed).
Is there a way to change the Data Foundation that is used by an existing Business Element layer ?
I'd appreciate any help that someone can offer on this topic. Even if it is not possible and someone can shed some light on why this would not work or would not be a good idea, I'd be interested in learning

Technically No the system will not allow you to change as it is involved with many depreciation areas and change is not permitted for control reason.
You only need to retire the asset, reverse the postings, assign correctly and repost the values.

How to Control authorization for users with certain status for level 2 WBS Element

Dear All,
Is there any standard way or enhancement available to control authorization for users with certain status for WBS Element i.e. for example
Pre-requisite:
There is only 2 level of project i.e.
Lev_ WBSE_______Description
1___ 7-14.E_______summay outage controller
2___ 7-14.E.2310__ Plant/unit # 2310
2___ 7-14.E.2310__ Plant/unit # 2220
Project Controller (authorization role assigned "Z_PS_OP7_OTGCON_C") have all project level authorization
Plant/Unit Controller (authorization role assigned "Z_PS_OP7_PLNTOTG_C_2310") have only level 2 authorization with enhancement that we did in system by Z table.
User ID_ Plant #
123345_ 2310
122455_ 2220
Issue:
After System Status released and User Status approved the WBS basic date for Plant/Units should be restricted from updating/changing by Plant/Unit Controller level and only project controller should have this authority.
Solution required:
Can any one tell how to control this scenario either by standard or enhancement available to control authorization
BR
Saqib Usman

Hi,
Did you explore SAP Enhancement CNEX0002 Using Transaction CMOD?
Thank you and regards,
Varshal Kachole
The SCN Rules of Engagement

Can't change an asset that originated from a WBS element that is now closed

When we try to transfer or make a change to an asset that originated from a closed WBS element we receive the following error message.
System status CLSD is active (WBS CP-00000999-009-009)
Thanks, Kevin

When we remove the wbs element number under the "Account assignment for investment" heading, then we are able to perform the asset transferwithout reopening the wbs. We were wanting to use that field so that our auditors could see the wbs from which the asset was created. If we do not use that field, how can we trace an asset back to the originating wbs?
Thanks,
Kevin

Change of Source Structure for Partial Settled WBS elements - CJ02

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for