CHARM: Customizing in Prod

hey,
we have to customize some things in our PROD-Sys.
But how can i get him (SolMan) to create a transport order just there in our PROD?
And not in our DEV???
Hope someone can help...
Kind Regards
Dirk

Hello Esteban,
I have been testing ChaRM this way for many customer for 2 years and it works perfectly... If you have only one system available I don't see any other way to do it.
Regards,
Stéphane.

Similar Messages

  • Charm - customizing landscape in SolMan

    Hello,
    I want to start working with ChaRM at at customer.  I would like to setup a "satellite system" that simulates a real DEV, QA, PRD.  We don't want to touch the current productive route, nor moving things into production while we test Solman.
    I suggesting a new logical system (ERP) pointed to three different clients.  However we are running out of server boxex.  One of the possibility is to have any ERP Sandbox available and then create these three additional  clients (500, 600, 700).  Then create a transport route for these three clients. 
    In this way we are going to have teh possibility of testing charm tickets for client-dependent customizing before moving to the real productive route.
    Do you see any other alternative for this type of simulation and training?  Do you have any example of a landscape for Solution Manager configuration and testing??.
    I appreciate your help
    Esteban Hartzstein

    Hello Esteban,
    I have been testing ChaRM this way for many customer for 2 years and it works perfectly... If you have only one system available I don't see any other way to do it.
    Regards,
    Stéphane.

  • ChaRM customizing - status hangs

    Hi,
    in customizing Service Desk/ChaRM we are using Incident Tickets (type ZLPI) which are linked with Change Requests (type ZDCI). The status profile used for the Incident Tickets is the following: 
    10     OPEN     Open     10     25     1     1     ZLPI_10
    20     DESC     Problem Described     20     30     1     1     ZLPI_20     INPR
    25     REJE     Rejected     25     25     1     1     ZLPI_25     FINI
    30     PACC     Problem Accepted     20     40     1     1     ZLPI_30     INPR
    40     PESS     In Process by ECS     20     50     1     1     ZLPI_40     INPR
    50     SPRO     Solution Proposed     50     71     1     1     ZLPI_50     INPR
    60     ONHO     On Hold     50     71     1     1     ZLPI_60     INPR
    66     SAPP     Solution Approved     66     80     1     1     ZLPI_65     INPR
    71     SREJ     Solution Rejected     25     71     1     1     ZLPI_70     INPR
    80     SIMP     Solution Implemented     80     90     1     1     ZLPI_80     INPR
    90     CLOS     Closed   90     90     1     1     ZLPI_90     FINI
    99     STS     Sent to SAP     99     99     1     1     ZLPI_99     INPR
    A Change Request can be withdrawn which causes the status of the linked Incident to be set to "Problem Accepted" (via the SET_PREDOC action which works fine). The only problem we encounter now is, once the status is set to "Problem Accepted", no further statuses can be set.
    Additional information:
    - the system status remains "In Process" when the Incident is set to "Problem Accepted"
    - the status still can be changed with the CRM_SOCM_SERVICE_REPORT (sequence of status profile is maintained)
    - Linked Change Requests can only be created when the incident is in status "Solution Approved" meaning every incident with a withdrawn change request already reached status Solution Approved (stat.nbr 66) before
    Has anyone encountered a similar problem with status profiles which 'hang' at a certain status ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Tom

    Correct,
    the following statuses - which should be shown - are not shown:
    - Problem Described     
    - Rejected     
    - In Process by ECS
    Regards,
    Tom

  • Charm customizing listing tool

    Hello,
    In service desk there is a program AI_SDK_CUSTOMIZING_LISTING that one can use to list all the customizing in service desk. Is there any such tool for listing all the customizing in Charm?

    nothing found

  • ChaRM: Customizing of Change Request (IBase/Component)

    Hi!
    By creation of Change Request the value "IBase / Component" should be filled.
    The default values here are: "0" and "0".
    Has some one already customizng experience here?
    I would like to change the value to e.g. "1" and "314" (my productive IBase).
    Thank you very much!
    regards
    H. Thomasson

    Hi Holger,
    I am not sure about CHARM.
    But since CHARM is also based on Service Desk functionality, may be the transaction IB52 can help you.
    Executing IB52 transaction, will take u to a screen from where u can select your Installed Base using value help. In most of the cases, there will be only one option.
    Just select that iBase, in the following screen, you will be able to see all the attributes of your installed base in the Text tab of the lower right part of the screen which is editable. Here you can make the required changes as you wish.
    Reward for helpful answers.
    best regds,
    Alagammai.
    Edited by: Alagammai Arunachalam on Sep 25, 2008 12:28 PM

  • ChaRM: Customizing of SAP smart formular CRM_REMINDER_MAIL_01

    Hi!
    I would like to customize the smart formular CRM_REMINDER_MAIL_01 in order to notify change request manager that the urgent correction status has been changed from "Created" to "In Development".
    The formular has originally the following view and will be generated as PDF:
    Title: Reminder Mail
    Text:
    One of your activities is overdue.
    Number: &orderadm_h-object_id&
    Description: &orderadm_h-description&
    Please do not respond to this mail, as it was automatically generated.
    Best Wishes - System Administration
    How can I customize the formular as follows?
    Title: Urgent correction &orderadm_h-object_id&
    Text:
    The urgent correction numer &orderadm_h-object_id&
    has changed their status from &???status_A& to
    status &???status_B&.
    Other question:
    What are the settings in tcode SCON to send the mails with formular name CRM_REMINDER_MAIL_01 as txt not as PDF?
    Thank you very much!
    regards

    Hello,
    please look here:
    Subject of the Email (CHARM/ServiceDesk)
    It should helps.
    Kind regards
    Marc

  • ChaRM: Customer fields Tab & Documentation

    Hi
    In the Change request screen there is a tab for customer fields under transaction data.  In this Tab there is a "Documents" button that allows me to attach project documentation to the CR.
    However if I try to do that when the CR has been approved it just says "Function cannot be performed".
    How can I change this behaviour to allow me to attach documentation after the CR is approved?

    Thank you
    This table is configured in the IMG area
    SAP Solution Manager
    Scenario Specific settings
    Change request management
    extended configuration
    assignment of documents
    configure action menu
    In this area I took the 2 entries for SDCR user status E0004 and copied them
    Set the activities to Change Document & saved these
    Then copied the original 2 entries again
    Set the activies to Assign document
    That gave me the activitie I require.
    Many thanks for your help

  • Customer subcontract

    All,
    Follwoing is my flow to handle customer subcontract using sales stock & Make-To-Order concept. We are given a Semi-FG say "F02" from customer in which "F02" is the product we sold to them before.  They subcont us to add colour to the "F02" and make it to FG as "F01" and ship it back to them and charge then an added-value cost (not full price including the cost of "F02")
    I encountered the problem as follows:
    1. In sales order how to differentiate between normal price and added-value price for F01 as when doing billing, we only want to charge the added-value price in subcontracting case, and charging full price for normal sales ordering (in which we make F02 for customer also).
    2. Any report other than MD04 to see make-to-stock S.O as in MTO scenario, Md04 wont shows the Sales order at all
    ******************Here is the config and flow**********************
    a).     Create Sales Order, in procurement tab "Requirement Class" = “KEV” and Schedule Line cat to “BN”
    b).     MIGO -> GR->Others -> 501-E -> for F02 (Customer Supplied Material), provideSales Order/Item#
    i)MMBEyou will see the stock is being show as “Sales Stock” (NOT Inventory stock)
    ii)Md04 for F45684XX4915FR3102 è you will see the stock as Sales Order stockè means customer owns the stock
    iii)MB51 for material doc for this GR è No account document means this GR stock does not affect the Balance sheet account on FI, but affect the MM (as it generate material document)
    c)CO08 to create Prod Order from Sales Order è use F01 (The FG to customer) è in Prod Order component view add component F45684XX4915FR3102 (op# = 10) è release $ Save go to MD04 you will see the S.O and cutomer Stock show
    d). MIGO GI--> Order# --> 261E
    i)Md04 è Sales Stock customer entry is gone
    ii)MB51 è material document has no accounting document è since the stock does not belongs to company (GR/GI of F02 does not affect FI, only MM)
    e).GR-> Order -> 521 E in where tab è use 101-E
    i)md04 è Prod Order Entry gone, only Cust Stock entry remain with stock quantity
    ii)MB51 è Accounting Document  Inventory/Fact Output equal to EK02 cost value * qty
    f).     Sales order no need to confirm stock, since it is MTO, the confirm field is auto assign with qty
    g.     Open DN è Vl01n è input pick qty è Save the DN (without PGI)
    MD04 è Delvry entry is shown
    h.     VL02n è PGI
    MD04 à All item are vanished
    i) VF01 -- create Billing
    price being chare equal to the normal price (NOT added-value price)

    "Dependent requirements ind. for individual and coll. reqmts" (MARC-SBDKZ) on MRP4 of material master is used to control whether the components are managed in the special stock segment or not in MTO environment.
    (Discussed many times on the forum.)

  • Need to build new instance in sync with PROD instance.

    Hi,
    I need to build a test instance at my location which should be in sync with customer's PROD instance. I was given backup of ad_bugs,ad_applied_patches tables. Customer is not ready for clone due to security reasons.
    This TEST instance will be used by our development people.
    To build a test instance, i prepared the action plan, Just i want to check with you people once again.
    1) building a new instance with rapid clone. I will keep same licencing, characterset,languages.
    2) I will start applying one bye one patches.
    Is this correct way or any other smarted way of doing the same activity.
    Regards
    SR.
    activity.

    By perfroming all the steps you describe, you are in effect doing a clone THE HARD WAY. Is there specific security concerns regarding data preventing you from using Rapid Clone? If so, there may be Oracle API's to resolve that.
    I highly recommend convincing your customer that Rapid Clone is the way to go. You may never get everything in synch and it will be difficult to identify, internal id's likely won't. I also don't believe the method you propose is supported.
    IMHO, Rapid Clone from prod is a requirement to support any SDLC e-biz installation.

  • Approvement workflow in ChaRM

    Hello,
    In ChaRM, we use the approvement workflow messaging. Automatic mails are sent (smartform) when a change request needs to be approved, when the developper can start working, etc.
    In our development system, everything runs fine, the mail is sent with the correct text.
    In the production system, the mails are sent, but the content of the mail is in a PDF attached to the mail. This is not practical at all for the users.
    ChaRM customizing and smartforms are the same on the two systems. What settings do I need to change in order to have the content of the mail directly in the message, without any attachment ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    I am sorry, but this functionality was in fact set up in our company by a SAP consultant.
    I have some knowledge on ChaRM customizing, but I would be absolutely incapable of giving you a step by step guide for this.
    PS: Sorry, I took the wrong user.
    Thomas
    Edited by: Support TAS SC-TAS on Aug 19, 2008 2:11 PM

  • Package designing strategy (may be stupid question)

    Hi,
    I always run into this problem while deciding package structure. Hope I can get it resolved once and for all here.
    There are customer and products domain objects. I will create seperate packages for them. Say each package will have several classes working together. I am showing only the core classes Customer.java and Product.java. The domain objects access database via database classes from corresponding "db" packages. Thus the structure looks like :
    \---root
    +---cust
    | | Customer.java
    | |
    | \---db
    | Customer.java
    |
    \---prod
    | Product.java
    |
    \---db
    Product.java
    Here is the problem :
    The above structure looks very logical to me but I have following issue:
    How to make root.prod.db.* accessible to root.prod.* only since it has no business outside it. Similarly the customer classes.
    I donot want to merge db.* classes with its parent as I want to keep database access classes seperate. I do not see any way around it.
    What is the approach generally taken for this very common issue or is it not an issue at all ?
    Should there not be a new visibility indicator which will allow the members to be visible to classes of its immediate parent package and current package only ?
    Thanx
    ~Tony

    I have found that package-protected access can be a
    huge benefit to creating reliable and highly efficient
    code. When you separate your classes out into sub
    packages this way, you lose the ability to use this
    tool. You might want to consider thinking about what
    classes will need to interact closely with each other.I am aware of all that u said and agree with it
    Will your db classes be populating the business
    objects with data? Generally it will be other way around.
    Do you want to force your data
    loading to have to go through setters or would it be
    beneficial to load the fields directly without
    exposing those fields to classes outside the package?Generally fields r not exposed.
    When you separate classes that are intractably
    y coupled in the design, you are creating headaches
    for yourself.How to get rid of that headache ?
    >
    Of course there are many schools of thought on this
    but I found that the package-protected modifier was
    extremely useful on my current project.
    There is also a problem with package sprawl. Don't
    create a package unless you plan to put more than a
    couple classes in it.If I understand u correctly, u are suggesting to put db classes with business. With due respect, this won't solve my prob as I want to keep db access logic seperate (my original question).

  • Material tracking report

    Hi Experts,
             Could any one please help me for writing material tracking report By using tables mseg,objk,kna1,afko,afpo,makt,ser05,ser03.
                The selection screen should be production order no, parent material no, parent material serian no, component material no, component serial no.
            This report should be used by pp and sd consultants.
    The out putshould be
    customer name, prod order no, pro date, prod matno, material description, Parent serial no, component matno ,comp material description, Component tracking no
    i Will give you maximum points.
                                                                                    Thanks & Regards,
                                                                                    Satyendra.

    Hi
    Go through the link given below , in which you will find all the stardard report related to materials.
    http://abapreports.blogspot.com/2008/06/standard-abap-reports-in-sd-and-mm.html
    Rewards if useful.
    With Regards
    Nikunj Shah

  • Selection Screen Choice

    Hi,
    I am new to ABAP and facing following problem. I have a selection screen with following parameters. I want prompt the user enter appropriate values based on first value he enters.
    Objective: To get production orders based on the values entered by user.
    For example:
    These are the combinations of required inputs:
    If the user first enters
    1) -> plant then he has to enter material number, Customer number, Prod. Heirarchy, workcenter, selection dates to get prod orders.
    if the user enters
    2) production number then he need not enter anything else to get the prod orders.
    if the user enters
    3) Sales order then he need not enter anything else to get the prod orders.
    How do I achieve this.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Sachin
    This is how my selection screen looks:
    DATA: P_SD LIKE AFPOD-EDATU.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL1 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-100.
          PARAMETERS: P_PLANT LIKE CAUFV-WERKS ,
                  P_PROD LIKE CAUFV-AUFNR,
                  P_SORD LIKE CAUFV-KDAUF,
                  P_MATNO LIKE CAUFV-PLNBEZ,
                  P_CUSTNO LIKE AFPOD-KUNNR2.
        SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL1.
        SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL2 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-200.
          PARAMETERS: P_HIER LIKE MARA-PRDHA OBLIGATORY VALUE CHECK.
          SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL2.
        SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL3 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-300.
          PARAMETERS: P_WC LIKE CRHD-ARBPL.
          SELECT-OPTIONS S_SELDAT FOR P_SD.
        SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL3.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF SCREEN 500.
    CALL SELECTION-SCREEN 500.

    DATA: P_SD LIKE AFPOD-EDATU.
    *selection-screen: begin of screen 500.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL1 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-100.
    *PARAMETERS: P_PLANT2 LIKE CAUFV-WERKS AS LISTBOX VISIBLE LENGTH 4 user-command ucomm  modif id 123.
    PARAMETERS: P_PLANT LIKE CAUFV-WERKS  modif id 123, "obligatory, "default '1005',
    P_PROD LIKE CAUFV-AUFNR modif id 010,
    P_SORD LIKE CAUFV-KDAUF modif id 789,
    P_MATNO LIKE CAUFV-PLNBEZ modif id 234,
    P_CUSTNO LIKE AFPOD-KUNNR modif id 234.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL1.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL2 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-200.
    PARAMETERS: P_HIER LIKE MARA-PRDHA  VALUE CHECK modif id 456 default '00115'.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL2.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK SEL3 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-300.
    PARAMETERS: P_WC LIKE CRHD-ARBPL modif id 567.
    SELECT-OPTIONS S_SELDAT FOR P_SD modif id 567.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK SEL3.
    *SELECTION-SCREEN END OF SCREEN 500.
    at selection-screen output.
    loop at screen.
    if p_plant is not initial.
    if screen-group1 = '234'
    or screen-group1 = '456'
    or screen-group1 = '567'.
    screen-required = 1.
    *screen-input = 1.
    modify screen.
    endif.
    endif.
    if p_prod is not initial.
    if screen-group1 = '234'
    or screen-group1 = '456'
    or screen-group1 = '567'
    or screen-group1 = '123'
    or screen-group1 = '789'.
    screen-input = 0.
    modify screen.
    endif.
    endif.
    if P_SORD is not initial.
    if screen-group1 = '234'
    or screen-group1 = '456'
    or screen-group1 = '567'
    or screen-group1 = '123'
    or screen-group1 = '010'.
    screen-input = 0.
    modify screen.
    endif.
    endif.
    endloop.
    start-of-selection.
    *call selection-screen 500.
    if p_plant is not initial.
    if P_CUSTNO is initial.
    message 'Enter all details' type 'I'.
    leave list-processing.
    endif.
    endif.
    hi, try this..unfortunately u need to enhance this code a bit ..i am leaving for the day ...
    hope this will give u some idea..
    santhosh

  • Duplicate rows being eliminated from OBIEE reports...

    Hi,
    Duplicate rows are being eliminated from OBIEE reports even though I have not specified the 'DISTINCT' clause under the advanced tab of the answers request.
    I read somewhere that this is a bug and the only solution is to include the table key column.
    Please let me know if this is correct or if there is another solutiuon to prevent this issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi user11935561,
    I've also noticed this too. And I did one of two things in the past:
    1) Yes, when applicable, I've added a unique identifier to the report so that duplicates were shown.
    2) Sometimes when I hit this I had a situation of a few dimensions in a report (lets say CUSTOMER and PRODUCT) and a measure (let's say sales $). If the customer 1 bought product A at $10, and he bought it on two different days, I was only seeing the DISTINCT record coming through, i.e. I was only seeing CUSTOMER 1 PROD A $10 instead of $20. Then I went into the RPD and changed the aggregation rule of Sales $ from None to SUM. The sum would force a group by get the correct information back from the RPD. So make sure you have your aggregate measures defined in the RPD and that should help you get around some of these issues.
    Hope this helps!
    Best regards,
    -Joe

  • EBS performance Question

    EBS: 12.1.1
    Platform: IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)
    1. Customer's PROD instance has 16 CPUs
    2. Active users number more than 2000
    3. Customer modify OACore number to '2', and use load runner test with 200 active users, then have some user login failed.
    4. Customer wants to know how to achieve the goal so that the EBS can afford more than 2000 active users
    5. 2 RAC DB + 4 APP Servers
    Thanks,
    Jackie
    Edited by: Jackie Han on Nov 22, 2012 12:56 AM

    Hi;
    No one can answer you from forum or see your AWR ASH etc reports.
    I suggest review below link first:
    https://blogs.oracle.com/stevenChan/entry/ebs_performance_patches << check Related Articles also
    Regard
    Helios

Maybe you are looking for