ChaRM Urgent Change Preliminary Import variant

Hi,
I am trying to change the Umode of the preliminary import program being used by an Urgent Change in ChaRM. This is the program name:
/TMWFLOW/SCMA_TRORDER_IMPORT
Is there a way to configure the import UMODE based on variant configuration? I know we can configure the variant to be used by the program in the Task List/Schedule Manager. However, currently there are no variants and I am also unable to configure/create a variant via SE38.
Thanks! Any help would be appreciated.
Luigi

Hi,
This question came up few more times in last 6 months here in the forum. What I understood is that you can not configure Umodes for Urgent Changes,
Regards,
Vivek

Similar Messages

CHaRM - Urgent Change - Transports removed from request when they are released

Hello, I'm in the processing of configuring and testing CHaRM within my landscape. I'm running into a strange problem when creating an Urgent Change. I can create the request without a problem. Then within the request I create a Transport Request (doesnt' matter if it is Workbench or Customizing) and then I create a task underneath that Transport Request. All of that works without an error. However, when I choose to either "Pass Urgent Change to Test" or click on "Release Transport Request" the release job appears to finish successfully, but then the Transport Request is removed from the Urgent Change form. Is the system supposed to work this way or am I doing something incorrectly?

Hi Jon,
did you put anything in the request or task?
Empty requests and tasks are deleted automatically in ChaRM.
Hope this helps,
Christoph

Cannot set status of Urgent Change after manual transport

Hi all,
We are usng CHARM in Solution Manager 7.1 for import to the SAP ECC (EHP6) systems.
I cannot set the status of the Urgent Change document (ZMHF) to status "To be Tested" after the transports were manually released and manually imported to the ECC QA system.
When I use action "Pass Urgent Change to Test", the system stopped with error "Not all task are yet released" and will not change the status .
Based, on the Task List log, the system started the release process although no transports were released.
Is there any way that I can update the status of the Urgent Change document to "To be Tested"?
I tried program CRM_SOCM_SERVICE_REPORT but still did not change the status.
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
Tess

Hi Venu,
have a look under System Administration - System Configuration -- Knowledge Management -- Configuration --Content Management -- User Interface -- Commands -- UI Command Groups -- StatemanagementGroup.
See Java class: com.sapportals.wcm.rendering.uicommand.cm.UIStatemanagementGroupCommand. Take the class and decompile this and everything needed around to understand how this class works.
Then you can choose to extend this CommandGroup to also have a command "Resubmit for Approval" or you can implement your own UI Command only for resubmitting (you will also have to activate your command (group) by settings within the configuration).
On the other hand, if all this is completely new to you, I'm a bit sceptical if the task isn't a bit too big as a first task on KM implementation topics...?
Hope it helps
Detlev

Cannot cancel Urgent Change document in Solman 7.1

Hi all,
After we upgraded to Solman 7.1, we found that the Urgent Change documents in CHARM are not allowed to be withdrawn/cancelled when tranports have already been imported to QA system.
In previous Solman 7.0, we were able to cancel/withdraw Urgent Correction documents using report CRM_SOCM_SERVICE_REPORT even when transports has already been moved to QA.
Any idea how we can cancel Urgent Change documents in Solman 7.1?
Thanks,
Tess

The question is how to do it? the end-user when open a CR will not do it and the receiver (service desk) can not waste his tiem doing it
Its a consulting issue.....not technical...who shd do is more like a process....so you know better in your current case.
Yes, but ths stnadard tool allow to do it or a Z programm is needed? Which type of inconsistences could appear?*
there is a standard report
CRM_SOCM_SERVICE_REPORT
but remember handle with care.
hope it resolves
regards
prakhar

Urgent change with unlock tasklist

Hello everyone,
the problem occured to our customer with customizing urgent change. They want import transport request manually through tasklist, but if urgent change is in status "Authorized for Production", tasklist is still locked.
I can release transport only through action "Import Urgent Change into Production System".
I think it has something to do with SAP Solution Manager > Capabilities (Optional) > Change Request Management > Make Settings for Change Transaction Types. We tried many options with action, but without success.
Could you somebody help me.
Best regards
Jan Strakoš

Hi Luigi,
You may always use imports via task list of the project that linked to UC.
but this is import all project buffer in que.
What the reason of customers that they want use only task list and not actions?
And what is the problem to use actions?
Unlocked task list of UC will not give any benefits regarding to UC transport import or release.
It is more easy to switch UC statuses via actions and import will be done automatically.
Otherwise you need to go to Task list and press additional buttons that will do the same.
Rg Dan

Ext.Reference field addition in ZMHF [Urgent change]

Hi Experts,
We have implemented ChaRM [Solman 7.10 -Sp10]and its woking fine and we need to include the additional field "Ext.Refernce" in ZMHF transcation type[Urgent Change].
Please let me know, how to include the field in ZHMF in Urgent Change.
Thanks & Regards
Elumalai

Done.
Thanks

Issues while saving urgent change

We have configured Charm on solution manager 7.1 sp08. Have successfully created urgent change document but while saving the urgent change we are gettin below error:
ERROR: The ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert results in duplicate database records. records in the data base. (termination: RABAX_STATE)
Short dump highlights are as follows:
An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.
The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB', was not caught
in
procedure "COM_PARTNER_UPDATE_DU" "(FUNCTION)", nor was it propagated by a
RAISING clause.
Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the
exception would occur, the current program is terminated.
The reason for the exception is:
If you use an ABAP/4 Open SQL array insert to insert a record in
the database and that record already exists with the same key,
this results in a termination.
(With an ABAP/4 Open SQL single record insert in the same error
situation, processing does not terminate, but SY-SUBRC is set to 4.)
We tried implementing OSS notes as well but of no use.
Will creating a new project help in this case. Kinldy reply.
Thanks in advance
Anshu

Adding more info related to implementation of note 2015657, following notes were irrelevant - 1651404, 1689809. rest of the two notes -1837743 and 1881656 were completely implemented.
Hope this clarifies the situation.
Let me know if any other note to be implemented...or creating a new project be helpful.
Thanks & Regards
Anshu

Import varying attribute dimension (with a load rule)

How do I maintain varying attribute dimensions in a model with a large base dimension? It does not make sense to manually maintain all those members in the outline.
Is it possible to import varying attribute dimensions (with a load rule)?

That is true for regular attribute dimensions. Nowhere, I have found instructions how to do this for varying attribute dimensions (aka slowly changing dimensions) that change over time.

CHARM Normal Change Project Cycle empty

Hi Gurus,
We are facing an issue in Normal Change in CHARM. The Project cycle and current phase is empty (not auto populated) when we select Normal Change in Scope assignment block. It is working fine for Urgent changes. We have only one project active for both urgent and normal changes. Normal change works fine in CHARM development system. Can anyone please help me getting this fixed ?
Current "phase is Development with Release". We are using Normal Change for the first time in production.

Hi,
Please see the screenshots of task list and project cycle (in web ui). We never closed our project cycle till now. We use Urgent changes regularly but our plan is to roll out normal changes now. Also, I noticed we have different number range mapped for normal change in production but not in development. Does that causes this issue ?

I imported an existing form but I do not want to save it to the cloud but save locally. How do I change the imported file that is saved on the Cloud to storing locally?

I have imported a PDF document and it automatically saves it to the cloud. I want the imported form to save locally? Is there a way to change an imported document from cloud to local?

Hi urs.boeschenstein,
Files are automatically saved to your online account when you use the Acrobat.com online services. However, you can most certainly download the files to your computer, by selecting them at https://cloud.acrobat.com/files, and then clicking the Download icon.
Are you having additional issues with your subscription?
Best,
Sara

While adding custom field in urgent change-Create new field button in AET is not coming

Dear All,
we have requirement to add some custom fields in urgent change document. while adding custom fields using AET, create new field button is not coming.
Thanks in advance. points will be awarded.
Rahul

Hi Jignesh,
Thanks for your valueble inputs, it really helped me to understand the process.
I checked in Web UI configuration for urgent change document as you mentioned but still that button is not coming.
In transaction BSP_WD_CMPWB, i have created enh. set: Z_ENHANCEMENT_SET.
Can you tell what to selelect in application and page popup which comes after selecting Enhance component button. Actually i tried but i am not able to add new record in conf.
Thanks in advance.

For one Urgent Change during performing the Approval(chnging the status to 'To be Tested') system does not recognize any changes using the CTS WBS BOM in the development system. The transaction is therefore incorrect or the status was reset by the system.

For one Urgent Change while performing the one of the Approval before changing the status to 'To Be Tested'
We are getting below error.
The system does not recognize any changes using the CTS WBS BOM in the development system. The transaction is therefore incorrect or the status was reset by the system.
COuld anyone please help us to know, How it can be resolved?
We also have this below error.
System Response
If the PPF action is a condition check, the condition is initially considered as not met, and leads to another warning, an error message, or status reset, depending on the configuration.
If the PPF action is the execution of a task in the task list, and the exception is critical, there is another error message in the document.
Procedure
The condition cannot be met until the cause is removed. Analyze all messages in the transaction application log.
Procedure for System Administration
Analyze any other messages in the task list application log, and the entries for the object /TMWFLOW/CMSCV
Additional Information:
System cancel RFC destination SM_UK4CLNT005_TRUSTED, Call TR_READ_COMM:
No authorization to log on as a trusted system (Tr usted RC=0).
/TMWFLOW/TU_GET_REQUEST_REMOTE:E:/TMWFLOW/TRACK_N:107
For above error Table /TMWFLOW/REP_DATA_FLOWwas refreshed as well but still the same error.

If you are in Test System, you can use function module AA_AFABER_DELETE to totally delete the depreciation area (tcode SE37, specify chart of depreciation and depreciation area), After that recreate your depreciation area and run AFBN. But before you do that, have you created a retirement transaction type that limits the posting on your new depreciation area? If not create one.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
Jhero

Notification to Manager on creation of an Urgent Change Control

Trying to set up a notification subscription so that when someone creates an Urgent Change Control, the Manager of that person gets notified. Looking in the subscription, under Recipients not sure what to put there. Since it could be anyone that creates
the CC, how do you direct the notification to just that persons Manager?
I am sure it has something to do with the Template that is used and the Activity tab but not sure what. Can someone get me started in the right direction or is this even possible?

Alternatively, If you need the line manager to approve, you might try adding a review activity to the process and setting the "Line Manager must approve" checkbox on that activity. if you have set up standard review activity notifications,
then the manager of whoever created the request will get a notice.
if the user only needs to be notified, then you might set the approval method on that activity to "automatic" so the notification is sent, then the RA is automatically approved and the process can continue.

Using Field-Symbols in a user exit to change the importing parameter

Please don't ask why but I need to use a user exit, changing the importing parameter. I decided that I could do this using field-symbols.
Please excuse my ignorance but I have never used field symbols for something such as this.
Here is my goal: Loop through an internal table (im_document-item). When I find what I need I want to make a change to this line (not so hard if I am looping into a field symbol) and also append a line to the end of the table im_document-item.
I have the following so far:
DATA: wa_item TYPE accit,
wa_item_out type ACCIT_SUB.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <document> type acc_document,
<accit> TYPE ACCIT.
LOOP AT im_document-item ASSIGNING <accit> where saknr = '0000211000'.
* Modify the curent line
wa_item = <accit>
* Append a new line into table im_document-item.
ENDLOOP.
How can I use field-symbols to append a line to this table? Please note that the table in question (im_document-item) is an importing only parameter.
Regards,
Davis

that will allow me to append an initial line with <accit> pointing to the line. Therefore I just have to modify <accit> and the new line will then have my changes?
Yep, that is exactly it. So after the APPEND statement, simply fill the fields of the <accit>.
append initial line to im_document-item ASSIGNING <accit>.
<accit>-field1 = 'Blah'.
<accit>-field2 = 'Blah'.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Time series inconsistency due to change in Fiscal variant/Storage bucket

Hi All,
We got into the situation where running time series consistency check on a DP planning area fails with the message pointing to, 'changes to Fiscal variant'. We are unable to track any changes to the fiscal variant though there is a possibility that storage bucket horizon could have been changed. Is there a way to correct/synch this by running a report?
We are trying to avoid re-initialization here, though this is an option, for the obvious reasons to backup the data in production. Is there an alternative solution to fix this inconsistency?
Cheers!

Dear Ashok,
You should never change a FYV when this FYV is used in a storage
bucket profile which is used in a planning area and if time series
objects are already created. It is no problem to maintain the FYV for
an additional time range, but changes and deletion of periods should
never be made if the FYV is actively used. You should not
change existing periods. If you want to make any changes to buckets
in your FYV or delete buckets, you should always make a COMPLETE
backup of ALL your data from the planning area into an InfoCube,
then delete the time series objects for the planning area (and with
this all the data in liveCache) and then change the FYV. After that,
you can create time series objects again and reload the data from the
Backup-InfoCube into the planning area. If you do these steps, you
will not risk to loose any data. The data in the InfoCube will be
the backup you can reload.
As some processes check the FYV some time before and after it is used,
it is very recommendable to maintain the FYV at least 2 - 3 years in
the past and in the future. E.g. if you create time series objects up
from 2001 you should maintain your FYV at least back to 1999 and if you
create time series objects until 2006, you should maintain your FYV
at least until 2008. It might be that you never experience problems if
you do not maintain the FYV in this time range, but some processes do
additional checks and then it can come to problems
Regards,
Rakesh

ChaRM Urgent Change Preliminary Import variant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for