Check for Maintenance Cost Budgeting

Dear All,
From EHP 5, there is one button in Order create/change screen called "Check for Maintenance Cost Budgeting", but couldn't find any documentation regarding it. I want to know total functionality of that button. Can anyone help me regarding this?

From Solution Browser:
Functionality Enhancements
For critical, high-value maintenance orders, it is essential for the planner to check to see if enough budget provision is available for maintaining a technical object. Based on the results, the planner can request approval for the order and the cost controller can approve the work. The budget forecast is retracted from the maintenance cost budget. Actual utilization is calculated based on past orders and work in progress.
[ECC 6.0 EHP 5 Version for SAP PM|http://erp.fmpmedia.com/Search.aspx]

Similar Messages

  • Maintenance Cost Budgeting - BI Content

    Hi
    I have recently implemented that BI Standard Content Maintenance Cost Budgeting system and an wondering who else is using it and what your experience has been.
    Thanks
    Grahame

    Hello Recca,
    The Predefined Data Model, has 3 InfoCube and 1 MultiProvider
    0PM_C01, 0PM_C05, 0PM_C06
    [BW for MCB: Configuration Guide|http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/Documentation/X20_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_AU.doc]
    Also see Page 45 & 113 for more details
    [SAP Business Information Warehouse 3.5: Business Intelligence 3.5.2 Add-On|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3ed09790-0201-0010-c28e-c639f87d40b9]
    Thanks
    Chandran

  • Maintenance Cost Budgeting

    Hello,
    I have created a maintenance Plan. the strategy is BPMWEK. Total of 52 weeks. I have inserted one operation in the task list which is assigned to the maintenance plan with time line of 2 hours.
    When i do the maintenance cost planning using tcode IP31, the system is calculating total hours as 106 instead of 104(52 weeks * 2hours). Why is it so?
    Regards,
    Narendra Bora

    hi
    i think you have scheduled the mainenance plan ,kindly check the number of call objects generated ,and compare the same with the works you have created
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • How to check for transportation cost is greater then delivery cost??

    Hi all,
    My customer dont want to be billed if the cost of the delivery is lesser then the transportation cost...
    i.e if the total delivery cost is $1000..
    and transport cost is $1200
    then what check should put in the configuration???
    please reply ASAP...

    hi Deep Blue
    you need to check use the user exit of delivery save. It seems that you need check the route in delivery by that you can check the delivery cost for that route and taking reference of the sales order of the item you need to find out the billing value after comparing you cand decided on saving the delivery document.
    Just try if you require any more input please let me know

  • Table for Planned cost & Budgeted value with WBS

    Hi,
    Which is the table where we can get WBS description & planned cost in PS?
    and any other table or report where we can see the comparison & see the balance of planned cost value and budget value
    thanks & regards,

    Hi,
    You mean to say in CJ40 not in CJ30.
    Step 1: Go to PRPS Table and enter the WBSE and get the OBJNR no.
    Step 2:Pass the OBJNR in RPSCO and you can get the planned cost value.Note WRTTP should be 1.
    Muzamil

  • Value category and description for maintenance costs

    Does anyone know how I can get the value category and description and tie it to our cost data coming from tables COSP & COSS?    I tried going to PMCO but there can be several entries say for labor, services and you have no way of knowing which entry belongs to what type of cost.
    thanks!

    Hi,
    the value categories + texts are in TPIR2 + TPIR2T. Since you are working with PM, you need to set APPL = PM. And you need to set the correct controlling area. To map the cost elements (COSP, COSS are based on cost elements) to value categories you need to analyze table TPIK3.
    Besides I think that the costs for PM orders are also saved to table PMCO. So reading this instead of COSP, COSS might be easier.
    Regards,
    Thorsten

  • Maintenance Cost Budgeting - MCB

    Experts:
    Currently, I installed the MCB application on the BPS and PM BI building blocks. Now, I read some oss notes and nformation in help.sap.com, sap best practices, etc.
    I must say, thhe planning areas from the business content are ready to fire up. There is a business process defined as follows:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-manufacturing?rid=/business_maps/guid/
    Unfortuantely, the sub tasks under the main processes were not provided.
    I am seeking a step by step instructions on the MCB budget process.
    I would like to hear from people that already have implemented this tool.
    Regards
    RAP

    Vidya:
    I am sorry for this late reply. Unfortunately, SDN didnu2019t inform about your enquiry.
    Anyhow, yes we implemented MCB and it is operational. Well, it has its own way of doing things. As a tool, yep it is OK cheap compare to an IP implementation.
    Yes, I have some documentation on how to customise (available in the Internet), some demo on how to use the tool (not available in the Internet). Please disclose your Email address and I will send it to ya.
    RAP

  • Issue - automatic release block in MRBR for planned costs (tol KW/PP)

    Tolerance key KW is defined for planned costs.  The tolerance is correctly selected in MIRO and invoices are blocked appropriately; there is no issue in MIRO.
    The block for planned costs is indicated as a price variance in MRBR and the condition is listed.  When MRBR is executed in 'Release Automatically' mode, system checks the tolerances defined under tolerance key PP rather than KW.  MRM_TOLERANCE_CHECK is called for tolerance key PP.
    Because the tolerance amount for tolerance key PP is checked rather than tolerance key KW (planned costs), invoices are released erroneously.  The tolerance for KW should be checked instead.
    Has anyone encountered this issue?  If so, what action did you take?
    Thank you in advance.

    Thank you for your input.  However, this does not solve the issue.  The tolerances should be checked appropriately in MRBR in the same way as in MIRO.  KW should be checked for planned costs and PP for the articles.

  • Maintenance cost per production output

    Dear All
    I have to create report based on Maintaince cost per production output
    and this report is company code wise and Fiscal year period wise ,
    now i got two different cubes from where i can get that cost
    1) 0PM_C01 for Maintenance Cost
    2) 0PC_C01 or IC_C03 for Production output in tonnes

    Hi,
    If the selections used for the query are available in both the cubes,ie company code and fiscal year, then just create a multi cube over it containing both maintenance cost and production output. Map it to the correct fields from the cube and create a report with formula to calculate maintenance cost per production using maintenance cost from  0PM_C01 and production output from 0PC_C01 or IC_C03.
    Regards ,
    Shyam.

  • Budget checking for Q Category

    Hi Experts,
    We are using WBS Elements in Procurement Process, When we creating PR with account assignment to WBS with Category P
    System is checking Budget and availability control is working fine but when i Creating PR against the AA Category Q
    System is not checking the Budget Availability Control
    Please help to fix this issue.
    Regards
    BK

    Hi Barath,
    I believe that your configuration is such that the inventoried materials are not taken under commitment whereas the direct costs/expenses are taken as commitment lines.
    All you need is to check if a cost element is create for the G/L that appears while you are creating PR or PO. If no cost element exists, then system will not check with the Budget.
    I will give you a simple example to understand this:
    Make a PO with acc *** cat "P" and see the account assignment tab. Now see the G/L. Make a note of it. Now enter the WBS in the relevant section and you will find that the G/L has changed. If you check that G/L, a cost element will be assigned to that.
    Now again make a PO with acc *** category "Q". See the Account assignment tab. Note down the G/L. Enter the WBS element and you will find that the same G/L appears again. If you analyse that G/L, there will be no cost element created for that.
    The G/L basically appears based on the Automatic Account Determination by your MM/FI Consultant against the Relevant Transaction Keys.
    Hope it helps you.
    Raghav

  • Internal Order Budget Check for PO with reference to PR / RFQ

    Hi All,
    I have a scenario where the budget availability control is not working for PO created with reference to PR or RFQ. While creating the PO if i modify the PO value more than RFQ or PR value then system is looking for budget control.
    If we create a direct PO system is checking for Budget control where the PO value is more than availability budget.
    We have the budget control check with internal order for services and non stock material based on substitution rule created for cost element group and cost center group.
    In tolerance limits budget availability control we have not activated for PR, itu2019s activated from PO.
    Kindly let me know what is the reason for budget availability control is not active where the PO is created with reference to PR or RFQ.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rama Mohan

    493900 - FAQ: Release Strategy:
    It is not possible to create a purchase order if the referenced purchase requisition is not released. But the system allows you to put the purchase order on hold and then release the purchase requisition.
    On the other hand you can create a purchase order with reference to an unreleased request of quotation.

  • Is there a process for moving costs from maintenance work orders to capital

    Is there a process for moving costs from maintenance work orders to capital projects?
    We have reversed the settlements on the work orders, and then trying to put the relevant NWA in , then receive error message :
    Rule for allocation of PM order to PS network is not maintained.

    hi
    check the allocation structure and the settlement related customization settings.

  • How can I check  the current cost and budget in SAP?

    Dear experts,
         How can I check  the current cost and budget in SAP for the PR approval?
    Table:COEP, COBK, COSS COSP can not find below information:Tender_budget,Working_budget,reconciliation,Additional,Adjustment,variation
    Best regards,
    Merry

    Dear expert,
         I need below information:Project_id,Cost_code,Nature_code,Section_code,Work_type,Work_code,Cost_type,Suffix,item_desc,Tender_budget,Working_budget,reconciliation,Additional,Adjustment,variation
    Can you tell me which table and filed can find them?
    Many thanks.
    best regards,
    Merry

  • We want to stop Budget AVC checks for MIGO & MIRO in Live System

    HI Everyone.
    We are using Funds Management (BCS) and at the inital stage we are checking the budget at PR, PO, GR & Invoice level.
    Now, due to the functional constraints we've decided to remove the Budget AVC checks for GR (MIGO) and IR (MIRO)
    Note: At the movement we are not using any activity groups w.r.t tolerance groups, bcoz if we specify the activity groups for only PR & PO, system wont check the budget at GR & IR but, system will post the negative values (FMB_PT01)
    So, as a work around, we've defined derivation steps at business transaction level (RMWE & RMRP) by assigning commitment item which is having financial transaction 40 & commitment item type 3, where system wont check the budget.
    But, system is not performing the derivation based on this rule in PRD, where with the same config system able to work properly as we desired in DEV client and able to bypass the MIGO & MIRO.
    Can anyone, give some suggestions or best way to achieve the said requirement of avoiding the AVC check @ MIGO & MIRO level.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Raja Sekhar

    Dear Mar,
    I've maintained the Pre-development parameters in PRD and it is working fine as per my Derivation rule.
    Can you tell me is there is similar kind of parameter, for service entry sheet also for the same purpose.
    i've tried by maintaining parameter FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in FM01X, due to which in ML81N system taking the fund center as per the derivation, but when i am creating PO for services, system is not able to derive the fund center,
         where as previously, before maintaining the above parameter, system use to derive the fund center based on cost center, which is not working after this maintainance.
    Any suggestions on this.
    Thanks for your support
    Raja Talluri

  • How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level?

    Dear all,
    How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level? The plan cost is done in network activity in CJ20N.
    I am not able to check using CJI4 or CJI9 report.
    Kindly advise.
    Thanks and regards,
    Jessie

    Hi Jess,
    Have you checked the navigation part which is being displayed on left hand side of report S_ALR_87013565 and S_ALR_87013533.? There you have option to check transaction currency and object currency when you double click on it.
    In case if it is not being displayed under navigation. Then you can bring them on from transaction code CJE2. For eg: Report group for S_ALR_87013533 is 12KST1C. Double click on it and it will open up to do changes in report layout and many more. There you also have options to bring on transaction currency too. Similarly, you can check for other report groups as well just by checking the report description.
    But I am not sure if suits your requirements. Wait for other experts to comment on this.
    Regards,
    Amit

Maybe you are looking for

  • File upload demo application in 2.0

    Hi! I implemented the file upload application from the demo applications with the standard table HTMLDB_APPLICATION_FILES. It works very fine. Thanks for sharing this code. BUT I was unable to implement a custom table, because I could not locate the

  • Exploratory testing - is there a way to link test runs to existing bugs

    Hi, We have a number of bugs which we are testing prior to business users performing their testing and signing off the bugs.  We dont have the time to write detailed scripts and are just performing a sense check that the fixes have been applied.  We

  • Physical change of location for OBIEE server.

    hi All, We are doing a physical relocation for OBIEE server and this would mean a change of IP address of the OBIEE server. From a OBIEE perspective what all would be affected and what all would have to be looked upon when we restart the OBIEE in the

  • Director 12 on mac os 10.7.5 spinning beachball every time i switch apps

    I have 16GB ram, and once director is launched - even with no movie open if i switch to the finder, or even a screen saver starts, when i go back to director i get the spinning beachball for 30-45 seconds, even on a fresh boot with no other apps runn

  • Trouble with adding photos to a collection

    Hi, till LR 4.1 it was easy to add photos to an existing collection. I just selected photos and dragged+dropped them on the name of the collection. Job done. This seems not to work in LR 4.2 any longer. I can only add photos to a collection by using