Check plant calendar against backend system

Hello,
Is there a way that when creating a SC item the systems checks if the delivery date is a working day on plant calendar in backend system and if not give an error message?
Regards,
Nelson

Hi,
   You can maintain the same calendar in SRM also,path is:
SAP Web Application Server>General Settings>Maintain Calendar.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Similar Messages

  • Replication of few Plants(Locations) from SAP R/3 Backend system

    Hi All,
    Some of the plants which has been created in SAP R/3 Backend System but they are not visible in Enterprise Buyers Portal Production System.
    In order to get the missing plants replicated to EBP System shall I run the program
    BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_FROM_SYSTEM  or any other program i have to run,please advise.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Pranab

    Hi Pranab,
    In order to replicate the selected plants from R/3 to EBP. Run the report (SA38)
    BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_SELECTED in SRM
    In order to replicate all the plants then ru the report BBP_LOCATIONS_GET_ALL.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Potal Authorisation Error:"Failed to connect backend system.Check your syst

    Hi Experts,
    Please advise me on how to proceed....
    I created a dashboard reports (5) based on 5 different reports in BI Queries using Visual Composer...I deployed them to portal and in portal i assigned those iviews to a role and assigned that role to a end user.
    In BW end user is autorized to execute those 5 queries and in portal user is able to access those queries as well
    But when he tried to execute Dashboard reports..it is displaying error
    "Failed to connect backend system.Check your system definition and user priviliges"
    Then i modified his authorisations in BW assigned SAP_J2EE_ADMIN role in BW and then in portal he is able to execute the Dashboard reports...by assigning the SAP_J2EE_ADMIN role he is able to execute dashboards in portal and he got more authorisation in portal than he required like 'Content Admin','User Admin' and 'System Admin'
    I tried by using SAP_J2EE_GUEST role but he is getting error
    "Failed to connect backend system.Check your system definition and user priviliges"
    Please advise on how to proceed
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Refer,
    Visual composer
    Failed to connect to backend system. Check your system definition and user
    Regards,
    P.Manivannan.

  • "Failed to connect backend system.Check your system definition and user pri

    Hi Experts,
    I am a BW Consultant working on Portal & Visual Composer (7.0)
    As a Developer i got SAP_ALL & SAP_J2EE_ADMIN roles in BW and System Admin and VC role in Portal.
    In Portal Created/Published iviews for BW Queries (Transaction) and Published them to a role (role1) in portal.
    In Visual Composer i developed Dashboard reports on BW Queries ,made them public and deployed them to a portal role(role 1) in portal.
    I assigned portal role to my self and tested the queries and dashboards in portal everything is working perfectly.
    In VC i can see 3 different systems defined in Portal
    I created a Test user (with profile of end user) in BW,Testuser is authorised to view all the reports in BW and All data in all data targets and in portal testuser is assigned with Role1 and VC Role.
    (Note: In BW Testuser doesn't had J2EE_ADMIN role).
    Portal:
    When i login to portal as testuser and tries to execute the BW Queries (Transaction) and it working perfectly.
    When i tried to execute Dashboard reports developed in Visual Composer it gives me an error
    "Failed to connect backend system.Check your system definition and user priviliges"
    In Visual Composer i logged in as testuser (as test user got VC role assigned) i can't see any list of avaliable systems under "Find Data"
    When i modified testuser profile in BW and updated with SAP_J2EE_ADMIN then i can execute the dashboard report but at the same time testuser got more than what he should have like user admin,system admin...etc
    I searched the sdn and find some similar threads ...but nothing was useful
    Please update me what went wrong and how to fix this...
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Refer,
    Visual composer
    Failed to connect to backend system. Check your system definition and user
    Regards,
    P.Manivannan.

  • Goods Receipt not transferred to the Backend System R/3

    We are currently using BBPCRM4.0 & SAP R/3 4.7 (extended scenario)
    For a particular Purchase Order which has a material number, We cannot transfer GR to the Backend System R/3 successfully.(The shopping cart of unsuccessfully transferred GR is created by using material)
    When I check R/3 using WE05, I can find the message "The plant data of the material G09002202 is locked by the user MRP_RFC". This must be the reason why GR is not transferred successfully to the Backend System, but I do not know what this message mean.(As you see, MRP_RFC is the user name that connects SRM and R/3. + That moment the material is not locked by any user in R/3)
    If we try to create the GR document again in SRM, the message "Item is already being processed" is shown, so cannot make BUS2203 Docs.
    To sort out this, we remove the GR Transfer Error Information in
    BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
    After removing the information of this error in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, surprisingly we can make GR successfully.
    Weird!.
    Only for a particular PO which has a material, but not everytime.
    Sometimes this problem happens.
    At the first time, it doesn't work, but after removing the data from BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, when we try GR again it works.
    Could you help me why this symptom happends..?
    Edited by: Hyangsook Moon on Feb 28, 2008 6:44 AM

    Hi Hyangsook Moon,
    The system is allowing  you to create Confirmation again in SRM because the status is not yet updated in SRM since the G.R is not created in the backend successfully.
    Since the confirmation is created in SRM and could not able to create G.R in R/3 through IDOC the system is giving you message as " Document is being processed".
    So the system is allowing you to create confirmation again once you delete the table entry.
    Hope this makes you more clear.Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Automatic Replication of Vendors from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System

    Hi All,
    I am searching for any existing standard configuration in SRM V 4.0 System for replicating Vendors of selected Purchasing Organizations from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System.
    I have checked in the SPRO  settings of SRM System and found/could make out from the documentation avalable in help itself, that there is a standard configuration by which you can automatically replicate the Vendors created in SAP R/3 by activating the following in SPRO: By putting a tick mark against the Check Box existing against "Create New Vendors also"  under Vendor Synchronization with Make Global Settings I hope.
    If the above statement is correct, then I hope we have to schedule a job ,since the above configuration is based on a job based execution which should run at least once a day.
    In that case,which would be the relevant job which has to be created WITH A VARIANT in order to filter the Purchasing Organizations desired for.
    Please help me out since we have to implement this asap.And if the above solution is not at all feasible,then please do reply at the earliest.
    Awaiting for your early reply .
    Regards
    Annette

    Hi
    Please try this ->
    <b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5e/88ef3bc8821d0de10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Incorrect distribution -Error while distributing GOA to R3 Backend system

    Hi,
    We have installed SRM server 5.5 and implementing contract Management
    scenario with backend system R/3 4.6B.
    In this scenario we are creating a Global Outline Agreement in SRM
    system and distributing it to the back-end ERP system.
    In SRM5.0 GOA (Trans.type GCTR) that are distributed at Header level
    are failing to distribute to R/3 system v4.6b
    We are getting this error message in SRM transaction SLG1: -
    The error ocurred by processing event RELEASED_NEWLY with GUID
    DCA7101B320134F1949F000347DE470F and object_id= 5600000054 " RECEPIENT
    NOT FOUND"
    The purchasing org , the plant has been mapped .Also vendor & material is maintained for the company & Plant .
    The condition types are mapped in SRM
    Pls suggest.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    Hi Avinash,
    In reference to your query about GOA, the distribution error might be beacause of the issues in BADI implementation.
    By using the BADI you can define which document to be created in the backend.
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE BADI can be used in SRM and BBP_CTR BADI can be used in back end R/3 for this purpose.
    Check for the transaction types (GCTR) and the number ranges for the transaction types.
    The GOA will either create a contract or a Scheduling agreement in R/3 back end after distribution.
    Also refer the below SDN thread in this regard :
    Re: Scheduling Agreement from GOA
    Any further clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for suitable answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Plant to plant subcontracting against sales order

    hi
         my scenario is like this
    two plants A and B under one company code, its repair scenario in this sales order come in plant b ,in this repairing we have 5 process out of which one process has to be carried out in plant 1,so  for that  we will do subcontracting against that sales order with plant b. so how to handle subcontracting with plant a against sales order.
    Edited by: AMIT RANE on Mar 4, 2009 7:55 AM

    Purpose: - Subcontracting is also possible in conjunction with sales order  The subcontracting orders are account-assigned to a slaes order . Thus, the components are not transferred (using a transfer posting) to the "stock of material provided to vendor" but are directly withdrawn from the sales order stock the time of the goods receipt. The material manufactured is also posted to the SO
    The cost of subcontracting is then debited to the SO.
    Since the components are not transferred to the "stock of material provided to vendor", it is recommended that you use a transfer posting to transfer the provided components to a new storage location (for example, 9999). This enables you to obtain an overview of those stocks that are physically located at the subcontractor. This information is particularly important when you carry out a physical inventory of the Project stocks.
    Features: -
    Withdrawal from Stock of Mat. Provided for Project: -
    For components that are managed in Project stock, you can define whether the components are to be withdrawn directly from each Project or from the stock of material provided to vendor. You manage this via the dependent requirements indicator for individual customer requirements and collective requirements (MARC-SBDKZ).
    You can maintain this indicator in the following places:
    In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4)
    In the explosion types for the BOM item (in Customizing for Production in the step Basic Data -> Bill of Material -> Item Data -> Define explosion types)
    Configuring the explosion types has priority over the configuration in Inventory Management.
    If the indicator is set at Collective requirements only (2), the materials are withdrawn from the stock of material provided to vendor. If this indicator is set any other way, the system withdraws materials from Project stock.
    Regarding Subcontracting Challan: -
    Go to OMJJ, select the field "movement type" and press enter
    Enter movement type "311" and double click on "Field selection (Enjoy)" under Dialog Structure on left side.
    here "New Entries" and add field "LIFNR" (Vendor- plant as vendor )
    Now in MIGO, at the time of transfer posting of components using movement type "311 E", specify the vendor code of the Subcontracting PO (i.e. Subcontractor)
    Now create Subcontracting Challan in J1IF01 for material document of 311 E movement type.
    Also check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > here for Movement Type Group "0001", Movement Type "311 E" should be maintained.
    Then do GR against PO and refer the Subcontracting Challan here.
    And then do reconciliation in J1IFQ for the GR Document against Subcontracting Challan.
    Also check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > here for Movement Type Group "0002", Movement Type "543 E" should be maintained.
    Follow the below mentioned process;
    Process Steps: -
    1. OX09 - Create Storage Location as "9999" for Subcontractor Location
    2. MB1B - Do Transfer Posting of material from RM Warehouse to this Storage Location via movement type "311 E" (Instead of doing 541)
    3. Now go to J1IF01 - here use material document of movement type "311 E" and create Subcontracting challan. (If required)
    Prerequisite: - In SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Business Transactions > Subcontracting > Maintain Movement Type Groups > Here for Movement Type Group "0001" (For issues), maintain movement type "311 E" also along with 541.
    Rest all; refer subcontracting challan during GR and then reconciliation and completion, etc... Will be same as usual.
    Note: - At the time of GR, consume components from storage location "9999" (for 543 movement type)
    regards
    KI

  • BBPGETVD throwing an error -Backend system with release 701 are not support

    Experts,
    After changing the Backend connection from  R3 4.6c to ECC6 sysem in our BBPCRM4.0,
    the transaction "BBPGETVD" is not working, which is throwing an error as
    "Backend system with release 701 are not supported".
    Already we have applied some of the notes (822883 &862290)
    Thanks
    Ahamed

    Are you able to replicate other data like plants, product categories from the same backend system or are you facing the same error?
    Also please check the logical system and see if they are assigned to the client correctly. (in SPRO settings)
    Thanks,
    Prashanth

  • RARs' criteria for analyzing roles in ECC backend system?

    Hi All,
    I'm working on setting up a prototype of Access Control 5.3. In RAR I notice the analyzis of roles is not done for all roles.
    I have taken note 1179717 into consideration, and also performed mass user compare. But not all roles are analyzed yet.
    Some of the roles are not tied to a profile, but it seems RAR does not segregate on this.
    Does anyone have a list of criteria RAR uses when looking at what roles to analyze?
    Thanks in advance,
    Leif Nilsson

    Hello Leif,
    You can find SAP Notes only on SAP Service Marketplace
    https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/notes
    You cannot directly compare the numbers of RAR with the roles you want to analyze, without following the below steps completed successfully.
    1- Connect the SAP backend system to Risk Analysis and Remediation and complete all post-install activities.
    2- First you have to run the report RHAUTUPD_NEW in your backend system.
    3- Select all roles, select 'Perform User Master Comparison', but check only "cleanups" from the 'editing types'.
    4- Now execute the report.
    5- When finished re-run a full user, role, profile synchronization for this SAP backend system in Risk Analysis and Remediation.
    There are two types of synchronization, Full and Incremental:
    6- Select Full synchronization
    7- Perform Batch Risk Analysis. This is the core function of RAR.  By performing a batch risk analysis, the security of the users/roles/profiles are compared against the Segregation of Duties rules to identify possible conflicts. It then makes a call to the back-end system to retrieve the authorization assigned to each of these user/roles/profiles.  It then performs the analysis against the rules in the front-end.
    8- Run Management Reports. Running this piece of the job is what ultimately updates the numbers you see on the Management Report and table virsa_cc_prmvl is updated.
    9-  You will get the list of total Number of Violations , the Violation count by Risk and  Violation Count by Permission
    Now you are ready to compare the numbers in the following way, seen below.
    10- Log on to your SAP backend system and use transaction SE11 to identify single roles with profiles from table AGR_1016, but note that roles having multiple profiles appear multiple times in this table.Count the number of distinct roles in table AGR_1016.
    11- Now, only count those distinct roles in AGR_1016 that have also an entry in AGR_DEFINE. You can do this with a small custom report or with Excell.
    12- In your SAP backend System use transaction SE11 to count the number of profile in table USR10 having the flag 'AKTPS' set to 'A'. Each profile appears only once in this table.
    This number should match the number on profiles synchronized in Risk Analysis and Remediation.
    Thanks,
    Mohi

  • Plant calendar in infopackage period selection

    Hi ,
    i have a requirement texts for which i am pasting !
    "In some of the infopackages on Production system , period selections are calculated dynamically via ABAP program.
    Check all info packs for the use of a plant calendar and rewrite
    the program without plant calendar to create the period selections"
    Can any one explain me what i exactly need to do?
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    Hi Ganesh,
    That means that there must be one info object which is representing plant calender of R/3 in BW. right?
    How could i know that particular info object?
    i had found one plant calender id which is of course not date!
    Since it is a periodic date selections i guess it must be plant calendar day?
    i can only procede furthur if i know the info object we are using for plant calendar !
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • Plant Calendar into SAP

    We would like to configure the plant calendar for holidays, etc so
    that when MRP runs and we do shipping/receiving it works around those
    days automatically.
    Please suggest what configuration we need to do

    Hi,
    You can do it by creating (SCAL)and assiging the Calender to the Plant.
    I can also suggest you to use the planning calender which is specifically use for the Manufacturing scenaro.
    Planning calendar is use at material level and you can assign this in MRP2 view along with lot size procedure (period lot size according to planning calander PK). By doing this procurement proposals will be created according to the periods defined in the planning calendar.
    Create one Planning calendar in MD25.
    Maintain Lot size as PK (MRP 1 view) and Planning calendar(MRP 2 view) in material master.
    After MRP, system will group all the requirements in each period and creates PR according to the planning calender.
    Also check the below link for the better understanding of planning calender
    [Factory Calender and Planning Calenderr;
    Check and revert.
    Thanks
    Hrishi

  • Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin

    Hi All,
    We are having a peculiar issue of 'Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin'.
    The P.O is in ordered status in SRM but the same is not getting transferred to backend ECC system.
    No error messages or logs in RZ20, SLG1 any where.
    All programmes like BBP_GET_STATUS_2 and CLEAN_REQREQ_UP are running fine.
    Tried pushing the P.Os manually using function module (BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC_V2) to backend ECC.
    It was working fine till a week ago and suddenly this problem is coming.
    We had implemented few OSS notes suggested by SAP for the issue of 'shopping carts appearing in sourcing cockpit even after P.O creation' in both development and test system.
    Now this issue is coming up in test system where as development system is working fine.
    Please let us know where to look and how to resolve this issue.
    A quick response would be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Teja

    I am facing the same issue with one PO in the Production system.
    SRM 5.0 , R/3 4.6C Extended classic scenario.
    I checked the status of other PO's created today. I see them in R/3. There is one PO which was created a week back which shows up as "ordered" in SRM but the PO is missing in R/3. When clicked on the details on the web, system throws the error
    Error while reading the PO in the Backend system. Inform system admin.
    Message no. BBP_CF010
    I checked RZ20, SLG1 no errors were found. I checked RFC connection, it was working fine too.
    I tried pushing the PO using the FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, it did not solve the problem.
    In SRM WEBGUI Process PO - Item data -->follow on documents --> PO status is shown as Archived.
    Any inputs would be greatly appreciated. Please throw some light on this issue.
    Krishna

  • Error while reading PO in backend system Inform system adiministrator

    Hi All,
    I am working on extended classic scenario and the problem is that after the PO ís ordered it gives the message " Error while reading PO in backend system Inform system administrator" and this is happening only for a particular local PO.
    When I check the PO number in R/3 it does not exist.
    The number range is correct both in SRM and R/3 (external no. range is ticked).
    Also I could not find any logs in RZ20 nor a dump.
    When I checked in bbp_pd, couldnt find any relevant information except that the PO has the status ordered.
    I am on SRM version BBPCRM 4.0 SAPKU40007
    R/3 version 4.6 C SAPKH46C47
    Thanks in advance,
    Rgrds,
    Raj
    Message was edited by:
            Raj Malhotra

    Hi
    Have you tried out this ?
    <b>There are two BADIs which might help you in achieving the job.</b>
    <u><b>BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI</b> [Control Extended Classic Scenario ]
    <b>and</b>
    <b>BBP_GROUP_LOC_PO</b>
    [Exit Grouping of Items for Local Purchase Orders]</u>
    <u>Read the documenatation first, using transaction - SE18
    before implementing them for your requirement.</u>
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Error while reading the PO in the Backend system   !

    Hi all,
    We  are working on SRM 5.0(SP12) and Extended classic scenario.
    The problem is that after the PO ís ordered it gives the message " Error while reading PO in backend system Inform system administrator" .
    When I check the PO number in R/3 it does not exist.
    The number range is correct both in SRM and R/3 (external no. range is ticked).
    In RZ20,i find the log:
    The error ocurred by processing event SENT_AGAIN with GUID 490F3C0834351AC6E10000000AE48838 and object_id= 3000000307
    The R/3 System Version is 4.6C.
    Any help is highly appreciated.

    Hi,
    Thanks for the response.
    This problem is hapeening for all PO's in the system.
    The no range is smae in both the systems.In SPRO ,howevre we have not maintained the no range in SRM for R/3 system.
    Here is the config details:
    Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Number Ranges>SRM Server Number Ranges-->Define Number Range for Local Purchase Orders
    EC     3000000000     3999999999     3000000320
    Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Number Ranges>SRM Server Number Ranges-->Define Number Ranges per Backend System for Follow-on Documents
    SAPE02_050     EC            RS
    Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings-->
    Define Transaction Types
    ECDP     PO: Direct Material     03     02
    ECPO     Purchase Order     EC
    I have already gone thorugh note Note 1258634 - Certain events cannot be de-activated.
    This note is however valid for SRM 6 and 7.
    PO is not reaching R/3 system.
    No error in sm58/sm12.
    The status in BBP_PD for the PO is :
    Stats:
               Status         Description                    Inact
    HEADER     I1009          Held                           X
    HEADER     I1015          Awaiting Approval              X
    HEADER     I1021          Created
    HEADER     I1038          Complete
    HEADER     I1043          Ordered
    HEADER     I1080          In Transfer to Execution Syst. X
    HEADER     I1180          Document Completed
    Awaiting your inputs.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Duplicate users in accounts list

    I've just migrated my account and all it's data to a new machine using Apples Migration Assistant and everythings working fine, however, I have multiple instances of my account in the Accounts preference pane (22 duplicates). In the Login window I ju

  • Need help in XSL transformation

    Hi, I have a requirement where a message is recieved on the BPEL service. The message is basically a list of 200 or less productids. The requirement is to break the incoming message into smaller messages having a list of 50 productids each and then d

  • If I modified a file in my itunes library that I already have in match the information in match is updated?

    Hello Ihope you can help me with this doubt If I modified a file of my itunes librery that I already have in macth the information in match will updated? Thanks

  • How Adobe Print Forms work?

    Hi All, Please could anybody tell me wich is the procedure so as to create Print Forms with ABAP and what i need to achive it? I understand that i have to create first in transaction sfp 1. create a interface where i must import the data i want to bi

  • Photo uploaded

    I need help with this question, I uploaded a new photo in mail preferences, it worked great... when I check mail, in mail online its the new photo..but not on mail on the desktop? its the old photo. Any help is appreciated. Dolores Belser