CIF - Dependent Requirements for Product Planned Externally

Hi Experts,
I have flagged a product in APO to be planned externally [Procurement type: P - external procurement planning].
I see it has Planned Externally in the Planned Orders where it is used as a component.
My problem is that que Requirements are not transfered to R/3 so the product can be planned by MRP.
What are the necessayr settings to maintain (excluding the technical CIF settings to connect R/3 to APO).
Thanks,
Marc

Hi Kumar,
So basically, you are saying that I can only transfer planned orders through the CIF and that I was wrong in assuming that I could transfer Dependent Requirements directly ?
Thanks,
Marc

Similar Messages

Planning of Dependent Requirements for BOM Components in Make to Order scen

Hi Friends - I want to execute a full cycle Make to Stock Scenario with Materials planning using MRP.
The scenario will include BOM Components with Routing.
The process flow I want to execute -
1. Create a Sales Order for a Finished Product (Product should have a BOM for Production)
2. Do the product Materials Planning for the Sales Order through MD50
3. Get all the dependent material requirements (both for products as Planned Order and also for BOM Components - all the BOM components should also be planned)
4. Convert Planned Order for Product to Production Order
5. Convert Planned Orders for BOM components to Purchase Requisition
6. Confirm Production Order
To execute this I have done the following
1. I have created a Material Master data for Finished Product (FERT).
2. I have assigned Item Category Group - NORM, and General Item Category group as NORM
3. I have assigned MRP Type PD in MRP 1 View and Strategy Group 20 (Make to Order Production) in MRP 3 View.
4. Now created a Universal (Type 3) BOM for the product with one material component.
5. Now also created a Routing for the Material with two operations having PP01 a control key.
6. Now created a standard sales order for the product.
7. Executed the MD50 for the Sales Order Item.
Now where do I find the BOM components for this material in the Sales Order?
After executing the planning Run MD50 I am only getting the requirements for Product only. I can't see any dependent requirements for the BOM components.
How do I make sure that the BOM components are also planned while the product is planned?
I have checked the component Stock Requirement List - there are no requirements generated from the Sales Order Product BOM.
Pls help me on this. How to do this so that the raw material components are also planned?
Thanks
Purnendu

Hi Dhaval, Sandeep, Ashok - Thanks a lot for your replies.
I have checked the Planned Order Created through Planning Run.
If I click on the Components Tab I am getting following message
No material components were determined
Message no. 61027
Diagnosis
Until now, no BOM explosion has been carried out or no BOM has been created for this material yet.
Procedure
Either explode the bill of material for this material, or
create the components manually by processing the planned order in change mode.
If I try to explode the BOM through Header Menu - Edit> Explode BOM
I am getting the same message.
If I click on the Bill of Material Tab - I am getting the same above messge.
Ashok - I have tried both the Selection Method -
Nil - Selection by Order Quant.
1 - Selection by Explosion Date
But with no effect.
Waiting for your advice.
Thanks and warm regards
Purnendu

How can link the accosaries requirements with production planning

"I am in cable manufacturing here i have a problem in accessories requirements ( dies,Nozzles,Rollers,Embossing wheels etc )link with production planning,at the time of production than these material required for production Can any body tell me how to link this ,accessories is not consubles "
Thanks,
Anurudh singh

Yes you can use PRT for these requirments,
Logistics - Production Process - Master Data - Production Resources/Tools - Production Resources/Tools - Equipment - Create.
spro->production planning for process industries->master data->production resources/tools (PRT)
you will see 5 transactions to configure your settings:
-define PRT auth.grps
-define PRT status
-define Task List Usages
-define PRT Group Keys
-Define Overview Variant for Where-Used List/Mass Replacement

UNABLE TO CREATE DEPENDENT REQUIREMENT FOR MIC - MULTIPLE SPECIFICATION REQ

Dear Gurus,
We have to create multiple specification for one MIC --> ECC 6.
We did the following activities.
1.Inspection Type 89 --> Multiple Specification is activated in customizing - Default Values.
2. For the material 1259, Inspection Set up - for the Inspection Type 89 carried out in QM View of Material Master.
    Multiple spec is activated in Material Master also.
3. Inspection Plan is created.MIC
4. I HAVE CREATED THE INSP. PLAN --> GROUP 236 AND COUNTER 1 USING QP01.
5.I HAVE ASSIGNED THE MIC --> TESTQC TO THE OPERATION.
6.In customizing,
    QM --> Quality Planning --> Inspection Planning --> General --> Multiple Specification
    For the OBJECT TYPE 01 --> COUNTRY,
   I HAVE ASSIGNED 4 COUNTRIES --> (1) BAHRAIN (2) DENMARK (3) FRANCE AND (4) GERMANY.
7.Now I want to create the Multiple specification using the Eng. Work Bench --> EWB.
8. Multple Spec. check box activated in EWB.
9 While creating a dependent requirement for the MIC in EWB, if I assign the object type --> Country
    and the Object --> Bahrain, I am getting the error as -->
=====================================================================
Assignment of material 000000000000001259;1000; is not available
Message no. QP306
================================================================================================================================================
I could not proceed.
HOW TO CREATE THE DEPENDENT REQUIREMENT IN EWB
Please guide.
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Dear Gajesh,
I appreciate for your prompt reply.
I have activated the multiple specification at client level as a first step.
Will you please check and confirm?
Expecting your reply,
With Best Regards,
Raghu Sharma

Cubes for Production Planning

Hi all,
Are there any cubes for production planning reports? Please respond.
Best Regards,
AI.

Hi
Yes, u can activate the following cubes from Bi content for reporting.
0PP_C01,
0PP_C02
0PP_C03
0PP_C04
0PP_C05
0PP_C06
and u can also refer to following link for more information
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/28/500b3c56488e6be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope this helps
Sonal....

General Reports for Production planning

Dear all,
Can you please explain me what are the reports generally important for production planning module.
How to generate a reports?
If possible,please explain with an example by showing some screen shots.
Regards
Rajasekaran

Hi Raja,
Did you search in Forum? Please search.
COOIS -Order Information System is the important report for PP module. In COOIS Under List there are different option to see order details, operation details, confirmation details, Error details, component details and Object Overview where you can see order, operation and component details.
CO24 -Missing Parts
MB24 -Reservation List
SAP Standard PP Reports
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri

Dependent requirements for Top level materials planned in MRP

Hey Gurus,
A top level material 20350 has a component 30397 and both of these materials are planned in APO. We have another top level material 30399 (but this material is planned in MRP) and the component 30397 (is planned in APO) will the dependent requirements from material 30399 be populated in APO for material 30397?
Sincerely,
Kris

Kris
As Datta has mentioned the dependent demand will not reflect for the component material in APO. We had the same scenario as yours and this is what we did
We modified the Planned order integration model filter criteria by adding custom logic in the BAdI CIF_INT_MODEL. The logic was to query the BOM tables in R/3 and find out all parents that have SNP relevant materials as components and include these parents in the list of materials for which planned orders are to be CIF'ed from R/3 . The BAdI will be invoked when you run the IM generation .
You also have to CIF the BOM to APO . Once the PDS and planned orders are available in APO , the dependent demand will be created automatically. ( If you do not want to modify the BAdI then you can write a query and identify the parents and add them to the integration model manually)
Thanks
Saradha

Hardware Requirements for Production Instance of EBS R12 version (12.1.1)

Hi All,
Can you please let me know, what is the Hardware Requirements ( like CPU's, RAM size and HDD size)for Production Instance of EBS R12 version (12.1.1) about 3000 users.
The production instance would be deployed on a Multi-Node architecture where in the Database and Concurrent Managers would be deployed in one box.
Forms & Web server (Application tier) would be deployed on a different box. It is proposed to have a minimum of two front-end servers with a hardware based load balancer for traffic management.
Thanks,
Venkat

My company have EBS R12.1.2 on LINUX system. We used HR, Finance, DW, ODI, Single sign on, Hyperion and peoplesoft.
we use two DELL R910 servers for production. one for EBS and ODI, another server for Peoplesoft, Hyperion, DW, ....
Our record indicate highest concurrent users are 1120 on EBS server. For EBS server I will suggest at least following configuration for more tan 1000 users:
1. DELL R910 with 4 sockets in it. each sock may have 2 to 4 cores. Even this configuration sometime we still get server complain 90% CPU load warning.
2. Min 64 GB RAM . 128 GB or 256 GB prefer.
3. Redhat X86_64 version Linux . Prefer version 5.7 and up.
4. PERC 6/E or H800 RAID card and connect to MD1000 or MD1120.
5. One MD1000/1120 for database, and two for backup (1TB X 15 disks). Depend on how many days backup keep on RAID. Our EBS database data in one year grow from 60 GB to 350 Gb.
6. dedicate tape backup library and server. Due to large amount of data.
7. need Grid control (OEM) server to monitor all databases and application servers.
8. for application server, you need at least two DELL R910 and run Microsoft Hyper-V in it better performance than VMware. Configure All EBS relate application servers on each R910 for redundant and load balance. I f you plan is 3000 users. You may need 4 DELL R910 servers. Anyway it can add later.
9. same hardware configuration may need for staging/test application servers.
10. If you want RAC or standby databses, you need more.
11. For development staging/test database server, you may need similar configuration. We have four servers for that purpose.
13. Don't forget ORACLE license you need purchase for database, application server and ....
13. EBS solution is NOT cheaper. If you can do other way, think it first. NOT only hardware, man power also very expensive.

System considers dependant requirements lying outside planning horizon

Hello Experts,
Iam running the MRP for procurement. I have defined a planning horizon so that system will consider the requirements of that period. Iam using NETPL as my planning method in MRP. I wanted to create only purchase requisitions during this period so I selected 1 as my creation indicator as well.
But the issue Iam facing is, system is not skipping the dependant requirements which is outside planning horizon. System skips only PIRs.
For all the dependant requirements outside planning horizon, system creates planned orders and for those within plannning horizon system creates purchase requisition. Is there any settings to skip system considering dependant requirements outside planning horizon.??
Thanks
Prathib

Hello
I believe that there is a misunderstanding about what exactly is the planning horizon. Using a planning horizon does not means that the requirements outside the horizon will not be planned.
The planning horizon represents a part of the planning area, where a planning file entry is made for the MRP processing key net change planning in the planning horizon (NETPL).
In this kind of net change planning, only those materials that have undergone a change that is relevant to MRP within the planning horizon are included in the planning run. Such materials receive a net change planning indicator in the planning file.
That means, if an MRP relevant change is made for a material within the planning horizon, the planning file entry NEPLT is set for this material.
You can check in the SAP Help how the planning horizon works, see below:
"You can also use a planning horizon to further limit the scope of the planning run. In "net change planning in the planning horizon", the system only plans materials that have undergone a change that is relevant to the planning run within the period which you defined as the planning horizon. The system sets the net change planning horizon indicator automatically for these materials."
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/f4/7d274f44af11d182b40000
e829fbfe/frameset.htm
So, the planning horizon only define is the planning file will be marked as "net change planning".
BR
Caetano

Table for Product Plan Status

Hi,
In "Basic Data" tab of Product Plan Detail, there's Status field which is the "User" status for the Product Plan. I am looking for the table which contains this Status field. DPR_PROJECT table only contain "System" Status field.
Thanks & Regards,
Tony

Hi
PO status is stored in Structure not in the table.
Please use the List displays to get the information like ME2N,ME2L, ME2M, ME2K etc
You can also get the information from the table EKKO, EKPO, EKET,EKBE
Hope it helps
thanks/karthik

Consumptin Account Required for Production Order

While i am creating production order in CO01, it is showing the following error.
Consumption account cannot be determined
Transaction                            :    GBB
Valuation / acct modification :     /AUF
Material / valuation class        :     (Finished Product) /7920
Why should we assign consumption account for valuation class 7920. Where i am doing mistake.

I had faced similar error y'day.. message that say's 'consumption account' is really misleading.. but, i think system is checking this account assignment upfront while creating the order. basically GBB/AUF assignment is required for 101 of FG/SFG material after production..
so, just assign a p&l account to VC 7920 and create the order it would be good..
Regards,
Sayujya
Edited by: Sayujya Patil on Jul 1, 2011 3:06 PM

Transfering Planned activity requirements for production

HI
any idea how to smoothen the process of transfering planing quantites from CO-PA trough PP (long term planning, demand managment) to activities.
Now we have to transfer quantities to SOP, than to DM, than to LTP wich is quite complicated.
We are opting for a Z program that will fill DM (tc MD61) directly from CO-PA tables.
cheers
matej

we fill the Demand Management from COPA tables with a "Z" report which calls functions BAPI_REQUIREMENTS_CREATE or BAPI_REQUIREMENTS_CHANGE
depending on wheter a requirement allready exists or not
cheers
matej

Plan numbers required for Products .

Hi All,
    I am stuck up with a problem .
    I want to use the BAPI " BAPI_PPMSRVAPS_GETLIST " and this uses Plant keys to get executed .
    I have a list of products for which I require the plan numbers .
    Can anyone guide me on from which table do I get this information ?
Regards,
Ranjita

Hi,
There is apparently no one direct table.
One group of tables is as below:
1.     Table /SAPAPO/MAPMAP >> Get Product ID
2.     Table /SAPAPO/LOCMAP >> Get Location ID
3.     Table /SAPAPO/TRPROD
Location ID
Product ID
Supply Srce Cat      >>       2   (for PPM)
You get         Ext. Plan No.
4.     Table   /SAPAPO/PLANMAP
Ext. Plan No.
You get
Plan            (PLANNR)
Plan   Id         (PLANID)
There may be some other group of tables though.
Regards
Datta

ATP Check Finished Goods against Components for production planning

Hi All,
Our business has a requirement that they want finished goods to be planned based on the availability of components. Currently we have an APO solution which plans at finished goods level only so there is no need to bring components into APO. We will probably use CTM (currently using Heuristics)
We have concerns about the harm that this will do to our system performance and we really do not want to bring these components into APO. We are therefore interested if there is any way we can avoid bringing these components into APO.
In the past, there use to be a seperate ATP server from SAP where this could be done but my understanding is that this was discontinued and is no longer supporetd. Can someone advise me if there was a product that replaced this ATP Server or does anyone have any suggestions on how we can avoid bringing the components into APO. Please consider that it is not possible to limit to just critical components.
Mark

Mark,
Hmmm.. Your seem to be considering adding hardware to support ATP server, but you seem unwilling to consider adding more hardware to the current SCM solution? Doesn't make much sense to me. Like most SAP products, SCM/APO can be expanded almost infinitely, if you need performance gains. Which you don't know yet.
Anyhow, depending on your requirements, CTM is probably overkill. PPDS or SNP alone would be adequate. If enhanced availability checking is what you want, then one of the GATP solutions would work.
I guess ATP server still exists (run transaction ACBD from ECC) but I don't think I have ever seen anyone use ATP server at the same time they are using SCM. All ATP server does is move the processing load of ECC ATP check onto a distinct buffered memory area. I don't see how that will solve your problem, but I guess I don't really understand what you mean by "planned based on the availability of components." You don't need anything special to plan FGs in SCM and components in R/3, this is pretty standard.
Rgds,
DB49

What are the privileges required for explain plan in Oracle 11g database

I am facing the problem in doing a explain plan for a view in Oracle 11g database. When I select from the view like this:
select * from zonewisearpu
It does a select on the view but when I give explain plan like
explain plan for
select * from zonewisearpu
I get the error like insufficient privileges.
Please let me know if things are getting missed out as I guess system level privileges are required to execute this.
I hope, my question is clear.
It’s a humble request to revert urgently if possible as I need to complete a task and do not know the way out.
Regards

975148 wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I have found out that an explain plan is possible on the user's own objects and is not possible on the granted objects from a different schema. For eg, if I do a explain plan on a view querying on tables from a different view, it would not allow the explain plan to proceed. This could mean that explain plan needs different privileges than just a select.
Requesting for a revert to this.
Here is a simple test case that I have perfomed
SQL> create user test1 identified by test1;
User created.
SQL> create user test2 identified by test1;
User created.
SQL> grant connect, resource to test1,test2;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> create table test1.tab1 as select * from v$session;
Table created.
SQL> connect test2/test1
Conencted.
SQL> show user
USER is "TEST2"
SQL>
SQL> explain plan for
2 select sid,serial#,status,username from test1.tab1 where username<> '';
Explained.
SQL>
So, as can be seen I am able to do a explain plan from user test2 for tables belong to user test1.
As far as privileges are concerned, following is the list
SQL> select * from dba_role_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE                        GRANTED_ROLE                   ADM DEF
TEST1                          CONNECT                        NO YES
TEST1                          RESOURCE                       NO YES
TEST2                          CONNECT                        NO YES
TEST2                          RESOURCE                       NO YES
SQL>
SQL> select grantee,owner,table_name,privilege from dba_tab_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE    OWNER      TABLE_NAME           PRIVILEGE
TEST2      TEST1      TAB1                 SELECT
SQL>
SQL> select * from dba_sys_privs where grantee in ('TEST1','TEST2') order by 1;
GRANTEE    PRIVILEGE                      ADM
TEST1      UNLIMITED TABLESPACE           NO
TEST2      UNLIMITED TABLESPACE           NO
SQL>

CIF - Dependent Requirements for Product Planned Externally

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for