Cisco Catalyst 2960-X and Cisco Prime compatibility

Hello All,
I had review all the compatibility matrix of versions of Cisco Prime 1.2, 1.4 and 2.0, and just can't find the Cisco Catalyst 2960-X series as a listed device, which really surprises me.
Can you clear that out??
Thanks,

The 2960X (and XR) support was added with Device Pack 2 for PI 2.0. It was released on 22 January 2014 and is available here.
(PI 2.1 won't be out until later this year, release date not yet announced.)
Following are the 2960X/XR types added:
Cisco Catalyst 2960-X Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1699
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1690
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1691
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1692
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1693
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1694
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1695
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1696
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1697
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1698
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PSK-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1700
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48LPS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1701
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24PS-S Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1702
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-48TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1703
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960X-24TS-LL Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1704
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960-XR Series Switches
Device Type
SYSOIDS
S/W Version
Software
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1797
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1798
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1799
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1800
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1801
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1802
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1803
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1804
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1805
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-I Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1806
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1807
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1808
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1809
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1810
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TD-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1811
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48FPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1812
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48LPS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1813
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-48TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1814
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24PS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1815
>=12.1
IOS
Cisco Catalyst 2960XR-24TS-L Switch
OID:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1816
>=12.1
IOS

Similar Messages

Catalyst 2960 ups and downs

Hi Cisco Community,
I'm posting you a very strange problem that I've been encountring these days, well I have some switchs configured correctly, the ping was OK, but some days ago, they lose connectivity, and I can't ping on them. After some time, they become reachable, then unreachable again ...
I checked, they are ON all of them all the time ...
Can you please help me to understand and resolve this problem...
Thank you so much

This time I'm gonna be more to the point (I hope so)
1. What is/are the model of your switch(es)? Give me exact models.
Switch A : Model number: WS-C2950-12
Switch B : Model number: WS-C2960-24TT-L
2. What is/are the IOS of your switch(es) having this problem? Give me exact version.
Switch A : IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(22)EA8a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Switch B : Cisco IOS Software, C2960 Software (C2960-LANBASE-M), Version 12.2(25)SEE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
3. Are you having problems to all switches or just one switch?
No I have handred of switchs similar to those, and other models (3560, 3550, 4507 ...)
4. Did you connect the console cable directly to the console port or the ethernet port?
Console Directly
Thanks

Catalyst 2960 Problem with Cisco SPA512

Hi there,
I hope someone can help me.
I don't have much experience with switches, I'm doing the desktop support in our company.
We have Catalyst 4510 R+E to 2 Catalyst 2960 switches and seperate VLAN's for IP Phones and for Internet in one part of our office.
Now I'm running into trouble with some IP Phones that are connected to the 2960 switches. It appears only to happen with Cisco's SPA-512. I've tried FW 7.5.2, 7.5.5 and 7.5.5b. These phones sporadically drop the call / connection, with the red MIC button blinking. Based on my research this means that it looses Internet connection. I have 1 SPA512 with FW 7.5.1 that does not show these symptoms.
I have other phones SPA942 and Polycom IP335 in the same area behind the same switches and no issues.
We've tried to disable auto negotiate and set a fixed transmition rate or either 1Gbps and 100Mbps, both without success.
I also have SPA512 in other areas of the office just connected to our Catalyst 4510 R+E and they work just fine. That's why I don't believe it has anything to do with the 4510, but I can be wrong.
That's all I have for you guys. Hope someone can help me to fix / troubleshoot this..
Frank

SSwitch3#test cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test started on interface Gi1/0/16
A TDR test can take a few seconds to run on an interface
Use 'show cable-diagnostics tdr' to read the TDR results.
SSwitch3#show cable-diagnostics tdr int g1/0/16
TDR test last run on: June 27 13:39:21
Interface Speed Local pair Pair length        Remote pair Pair status
Gi1/0/16 1000M Pair A     52   +/- 10 meters Pair A      Normal
                Pair B     52   +/- 10 meters Pair B      Normal
                Pair C     52   +/- 10 meters Pair C      Normal
                Pair D     52   +/- 10 meters Pair D      Normal
SSwitch3#

Catalyst 2960 - IBM/Cisco IGESM - Trunk port configuration

Good day all!
I am new in Cisco world and try to configure a trunk between a Catalyst 2960 switch and a IBM Blade Center IGESM switch (manifactured by Cisco).
Unfortunately, it seems that the network traffic doesn't cross the trunk link.
I have followed (at least, I think so) the instructions given on the different Cisco documentation papers but I can't find the mistake in my configuration (lack of experience :-( !).
Both switches are using IOS. 2960 uses IOS 12.2(25)FX and IGESM uses IOS 12.2(22)EA8.
The ports are connected through a cross-over cable Cat5e.
Please find below the configuration for each ports:
Catalyst 2960:
Name: Gi0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 1,99,200
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
IBM/Cisco IGESM:
Name: Gi0/20
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 1,99,200
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
For my test, I try to ping a blade (connected to IGESM) in VLAN 200 from a workstation connected to Catalyst 2960 (in VLAN 200 too). From a network anaylser (ethereal), I can see the ARP broadcast from each side but none are going across the trunk link.
I am a bit lost about this problem and would be grateful for any assistance in solving it!
Many, many thanks in advance for your time!
Best regards,
Fabian

Hi Glen!
Both switches (Catalyst 2960 & IGESM) are brand new and most ports are still reflecting manufacturer's default configuration. Vlan 2 is the default native vlan for IGESM ports (excluding ports used for switch management which use vlan 1 as most Cisco switches).
I changed the native vlan for g0/5 on IGESM to 200. Now, ports g0/5 (access mode) and g0/20 (trunk mode) are on native vlan 200. On g0/5 is installed Windows 2003 instance (firewall disabled). The only purpose is to receive and send ping request to test connectivity.
My workstation is connected to 2960 switch on port fa0/1 (please find the configuration below). I can successfully ping other vlan 200 machines connected on the same switch. For testing purpose, I try to ping the blade machine connected on port g0/5 on IGESM.
Configuration of fa0/1:
Name: Fa0/1
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: dynamic auto
Operational Mode: static access
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: native
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 200 (Workstation VLAN)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: ALL
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Protected: false
Unknown unicast blocked: disabled
Unknown multicast blocked: disabled
Appliance trust: none
Is there any other information I could provide to better help you to understand the configuration?
Cheers!
Fabian

Can't see Catalyst 2960 48TT

I had to connect a new Catalyst 2960 48TT switch to my Network. Which is connected straight to port two in Catalyst 3750G 48+4. I have three other already connected: 2 x Catalyst 2960 48TT and 1 Catalyst 2960 48TC.
The problem is I can not see the newly connected switch in Cisco Network Assistant. I see the other two switches but not the new one.
I have couple of computers connected to the new switch which are working fine.
I changed the main cables which go from 3750G to the other switches.
The network is working fine, the connected compuetrs have internet...
Can someone please help...?

....Port Settings, on the 3750G(port 2)...
(ALL the ports are set correctly, on all the switches)
Status: enable
Duplex: auto
speed: auto
PortFast: enable when static access
Flow ctrl: off
Auto MDIX: on
VLAN SETTINGS:
Administrative port: 802.1Q Trunk
trunk allowed VLAN:1,2,5,10,15,20.....
Pruning VLAN: 2-1001
Native VLAN: 1

Bandwidth monitoring on a Catalyst 2960

Hello all, I'm working with two Catalyst 2960 switches and I would like to know if there is a way to monitor bandwidth on individual ports. Ideally I would like to have one graph showing a bandwidth usage reading on each port. I tried using the Network Assistant to accomplish this, but I was only able to view one port at a time. I also tried using a traffic graphing program from Paessler, but a MIB file is needed to allow the program to connect to the switch. When I ran a search on the network management page the 2960 was not on the list for MIB supported products. Is this type of graph possible to do? Or is there a more effective way to accomplish what I would like to do. Any ideas or suggestions would be helpful.

Hi, we have just swapped all our avaya switches with catalyst 2960 (12, 24 and 48 ports) and 3750 (48 ports with 10gig module).
How do I find what port I should monitor for bandwith graphs?
Target[10.0.0.22_loc1]: 1:@10.0.0.22:

Problem GLC-T with Catalyst 2960

Hi Team
We happen case GLC-T with Catalyst 2960 Hang , It can't work
We was reload switch but same ( GLC-T with Catalyst 2960 Hang)
and use command bellow
Switch97#
Switch97#
Switch97#sh int gi 1/0/26 transceiver 5 transceiver de
Switch97#sh int gi 1/0/25 transceiver detail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 0 yeti_iic_read_retry fail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 0 yeti_iic_read_retry fail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 0 yeti_iic_read_retry failDiagnostic Monitoring is not implemented.
Switch97#
Switch97#
Switch97#sh int gi 1/0/25 transceiver detail 6 transceiver de
Switch97#sh int gi 1/0/26 transceiver detail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 1 yeti_iic_read_retry fail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 1 yeti_iic_read_retry fail
hulc_sfp_iic_intf_read_eeprom sfp _index 1 yeti_iic_read_retry failDiagnostic Monitoring is not implemented.
We try IOS Software EX3, EX4, EX5 and 15-2.2 but can't problem
Please suggest case to me

cisco WS-C2960X-24TS-L (APM86XXX) processor (revision A0) with 524288K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FCW1832A38M
Last reset from power-on
1 Virtual Ethernet interface
1 FastEthernet interface
28 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
The password-recovery mechanism is enabled.
512K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory.
Base ethernet MAC Address : F0:9E:63:F7:8B:00
Motherboard assembly number : 73-15973-02
Power supply part number : 341-0529-02
Motherboard serial number : FOC183234M6
Power supply serial number : LIT18220612
Model revision number : A0
Motherboard revision number : A0
Model number : WS-C2960X-24TS-L
Daughterboard assembly number : 73-14200-03
Daughterboard serial number : FOC18319MMY
System serial number : FCW1832A38M
Top Assembly Part Number : 800-41470-01
Top Assembly Revision Number : A0
Version ID : V03
CLEI Code Number : CMMMU00ARB
Daughterboard revision number : A0
Hardware Board Revision Number : 0x12
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
* 1 28 WS-C2960X-24TS-L 15.0(2)EX3 C2960X-UNIVERSALK9-M

Configuring SNMpv3 in switch 2960 and connect to cisco prime 6.3

hi
I configuring the parameters in the switch for snmp v3 and the cisco prime, but i don´t have any response
but, I configure snmp version1 this work
in the scree on the cisco prime, don´t appear this field´s to configure all parameters for snmpv3
any idea??
thanks

Hi ,
share your SNMPv3 config or I have attached the sample SNMPv3 config , kindly check or reconfigure it and see if it help
Thanks-
Afroz
***Ratings Encourages Contributors ***

Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2 and Aironet 1250 + VSS issues

Hi,
I am new to the NCS implementations and configurations. I have one very specific case with Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2 and autonomnous APs and several issues with Cisco VSS on 6500 switches.
So here is the version from Prime:
NCS/admin# show version
Cisco Application Deployment Engine OS Release: 2.0
ADE-OS Build Version: 2.0.1.038
ADE-OS System Architecture: x86_64
Copyright (c) 2005-2010 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Hostname: NCS
Version information of installed applications
Cisco Prime Network Control System
Version : 1.2.1.012
IOS version on our APs (which are autonomnous) is:
AP-N-1>show ver
Cisco IOS Software, C1250 Software (C1250-K9W7-M), Version 12.4(25d)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Thu 11-Aug-11 03:23 by prod_rel_team
Well the issue what we have now is that access point has been added but its not recognized by the NCS prime. I have tried all three versions of SNMP but I get the same result. The SNMP configuration is valid since I use the same for my switching infrastructure. When I enter "debug snmp packets" and "terminal monitor" I can see the SNMP communication between Prime and Aironet 1250 which is standalone.
When I switch to Lifecycle theme and go to Operate > Device Monitor Center I see all devices I have added. The Aironet 1250 is reachable but under collection status I get Managed with Warnings. When I hover over with my mouse I get "None available".
I have successfully added my switching infrastructure in total, which is operating perfectly for Catalyst 2960/3650/3750/4500 series but for 6500 under VSS I have some warnings. The device is recognized by the system which is excellent and all is operational. I get the following errors under Collection Status:
feature_sensor
SNMP request timed out
feature_powerSupplyFanStatus-6k
SNMP request timed out
IdentityCapability
The device is unreachable.
feature_flashdevice
SNMP request timed out
sam_ipsla_feature
The device is unreachable.
What can be done to resolve these issues ? I have attached a screenshot of this particular issue. The affected access point is 172.16.165.241.
Predrag Petrovic

Hi rajeeshp,
Currently I am not allowed to upgrade it because of internal procedures involved in upgrading a specific piece of software (obtaining permissions from various departments). Is it free to upgrade from 1.2 to 1.3 or there is a specific charge for that.
Predrag Petrovic

Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment with BE7K and VMWare license

Hello, I am looking for some help trying to figure out if Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment can be used to upgrade our existing 7.1.5 cluster. From what I have read there is a API problem with the VMWare license that comes with the BE7K. But after reviewing the BOM/quote from my VAR it lists the foundation license which based of the release notes is supported.
UCSS-U-VMW-FND-5-1
UCSS Cisco UC Virt. Foundation Five Year - 1 server
Has anybody out there had expericne with PCD and BE7K'?
This is from release notes of PCD
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/10_5_1/CUCM_BK_P139675A_00_pcd-rns-1051/CUCM_BK_P139675A_00_pcd-rns-1051_chapter_010.html
Search for “Business Edition 7000” and it will state it is not supported with PCD. It is because the licenses that the BE 6k and 7K are shipped with don’t enable certain VMware APIs that PCD needs.
“Virtualization Software License Compatibility
Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment is not compatible with all license types of VMware vSphere ESXi, as some licenses do not enable required VMware APIs.
The following are compatible with Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment:
Cisco UC Virtualization Foundation (appears as "Foundation Edition" in vSphere Client)
VMware vSphere Standard Edition, Enterprise Edition, or Enterprise Plus Edition
Evaluation mode license
The following are not compatible with Cisco Prime Collaboration Deployment:
Cisco UC Virtualization Hypervisor (appears as "Hypervisor Edition" in vSphere Client)-preloaded on Cisco Business Edition 6000 and Business Edition 7000
VMware vSphere Hypervisor Edition
Any help would be appreacted.
JP

Thanks Jamie for repsonding, we haven't made any purchase's yet but I wanted to ensure we are purchasing a solution that won't lead to a lot of frustration. We only have 1000 phones so we are pretty small and the BE7K seems to be a good fit and value.
Cheers,

Ask the Expert: Cisco Prime Infrastructure - Implementation and Deployment

Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation.
This Ask The expert Session will cover questions spanning Cisco Prime Infrastructure on Implementation and Deployment on Wired and Wireless. This will be more specific to Customer’s and Partners questions product covering PI on configuration, Features and Menu, Network Monitoring, Maps, Implementation, High Availability and Maintenance and t/s parts.
Monday, February 2nd, 2015 to Friday, February 13th, 2015
Dhiresh Yadav is a customer support engineer in High-Touch Technical Services (HTTS) handling supporting Wireless and Network Management based Cisco products and is based in Bangalore. His areas of expertise include Cisco Prime Infrastructure and Cisco Wireless products. He has over 7 years of industry experience working with large enterprise and service provider networks. He also holds CCNP (RS) and CCIE (DC) certifications.
Afroz Ahmad is a customer support engineer in High-Touch Technical Services (HTTS) handling supporting Wireless and Network Management based Cisco products and is based in Bangalore. His areas of expertise include Cisco NMS products like Prime Infrastructure, LMS, IP SLA and SNMP etc. He has over 7 years of industry experience working with large enterprise and service provider networks. He also holds CCNP (RS),CCIE (DC), and SCJP (Sun Certified Java Professional )
Vinod Kumar Arya is a customer support engineer in High-Touch Technical Services (HTTS) handling supporting Wireless and Network Management based Cisco products and is based in Bangalore. His areas of expertise include Cisco NMS products like Prime Infrastructure, LMS, IP SLA and SNMP etc. He has over 8 years of industry experience working with large enterprise and service provider networks. He also holds VCP 5 and RHCE certifications.
** Remember to use the rating system to let the experts know you have received an adequate response.**
Because of the volume expected during this event, the experts might not be able to answer every question. Remember that you can continue the conversation in the Network Infrastructure community, > Network Management, shortly after the event. This event lasts through February 13th 2015. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and those of other Cisco Support Community members.

Hello Wilson,
Thanks for joining us.
1841 should just work fine for net flow . Hope you have a valid "PI Assurance license" installed on the server.
"PI Assurance license" is required for "net-flow" feature
Devices supporting Netflow in PI ::
1400, 1600, 1700 & 1800
2500, 2600 & 2800
3600, 3700, 3750 & 3800
4500 & 4700
AS5300 & 5800
7200, 7300, 7400 & 7500
Catalyst 4500 ASCI
Catalyst 5000, 6500, & 7600 ASCI
ESR 10000 ASCI
GSR 12000 ASCI
Cisco IOS Software Release Version
Supported Cisco Hardware Platforms
11.1CA, 11.1CC
Cisco 7200 and 7500 series, RSP 7200 series
12.0
Cisco 1720, 2600, 3600, 4500, 4700, AS5800
RSP 7000 and 7200 series
uBR 7200 and 7500 series
RSM series
12.0T, 12.0S
Cisco 1720, 2600, 3600, 4500, 4700, AS5800
RSP 7000 and 7200 series
uBR 7200 and 7500 series
RSM series, MGX8800RPM series, and BPx8600 series
12.0(3)T, 12.0(3)S
Cisco 1720, 2600, 3600, 4500, 4700, AS5300, AS5800
RSP 7000 and 7200 series
uBR 7200 and 7500 series
RSM series, MGX8800RPM series, and BPx8650 series
12.0(4)T
Cisco 1400, 1600, 1720, 2500, 2600, 3600, 4500,
4700, AS5300, AS5800
RSP 7000 and 7200 series
uBR 7200 and 7500 series
RSM series, MGX8800RPM series, and BPx8650 series
12.0(4)XE
Cisco 7100 series
12.0(6)S
Cisco 12000 series
NetFlow is also supported by these devices Cisco 800, 1700, 1800, 2800, 3800, 6500, 7300, 7600, 10000, CRS-1 and these Catalyst series switches: 45xx, 55xx, 6xxx.
NetFlow export is also supported on other Cisco switches when using a NetFlow Feature Card (NFFC) or NFFC II and the Route Switch Module (RSM), or Route Switch Feature Card (RSFC). However, check whether version 5 is supported, as most switches export version 7 by default.
You can check the below steps to diagnose the issue::
To verify that NetFlow is exported from a device to PI, follow the steps below:
1)   Browse to Administration > Data Sources page. Check the value in column ‘Last Active Time’ for the ‘Device Data Sources’ table. If the table is empty or the value does not represent recent time, then
it is possible that the device is not exporting NetFlow or PI Assurance license is not applied / expired.
2)   Login to PI console ( via SSH) as root user and run the command:
                netstat –an | grep 9991 – Output of this should be like : udp        0      0 :::9991         :::*
                Check the firewall settings on PI server using the command: firewall -L
1)   Check the configuration on an IOS / IOS –XE device. Run the commands
a)   sh running-config | inc destination
1)   This should list the IP address of the PI SERVER ( along with other outputs if any)
b)   sh running-config | inc 9991
1)   This should list at least one entry.
c)   If the above are fine, then verify that the flow monitor, flow exporter and the flow records are correctly configured on the device.
Refer to the URLs below to configure NetFlow export.
http://preview.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/2.0/user/guide/setup_monitor.html#wp1056427
Thanks-
Afroz
***Ratings Encourages Contributors ****

Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.1 - WS-C2940-8TF-S and WS-C2940-8TT-S supported ?

Hello community,
I've got a question just to play safe.
I'm running a Cisco Prime Infrastructure 2.1, we still do have a bunch of WS-C2940-8TF-S and WS-C2940-8TT-S with running images 12.1(22)EA12 , 12.1(22)EA13 and 12.1(22)EA14.
I know these switch types already have a End-of-Sale and End-of-Life Announcement for the Cisco Catalyst 2940-8TT-S and 2940-8TF-S Compact Switches ("http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-2940-series-switches/end_of_life_notice_c51-510224.html").
The inventory collection status in the device work Center is for these switch types "Collection Failure", the error message is this one:
An unexpected error has occurred:
# Check the device is in supported device list in deployment guide -> not listed in "http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/prime/infrastructure/2-1/release/notes/cpi_rn.html#pgfId-43885"
# Check there is connectivity between the device and PI -> Checked adnd OK
# Check the device credentials provided are valid -> Checked adnd OK
# Finally if the problem still persists then contact Cisco System's technical assistance center -> not done yet, looks like these switch types are not supported any more in PI 2.1 ?
Can anyone confirm this or answer back because these switch types are supported in her/his PI2.1 installation?
Best regards
Bastian

Prime Infrastructure won't support those legacy models.

Cisco SG300-28 / SGE2000 / Catalyst 2960

Hello everyone,
I'm looking for switch to accompany Cisco ASA 5520 in data center, with 20+ GE ports and no need for PoE.
I would like to understand the difference between Cisco SG300-28, Cisco SGE2000 and Cisco Catalyst 2960, 2960-C and 2960-S Series (except specific number of ports). As far as I can see the Cisco SGE2000 has 4x SFP and is stackable unlike the SG300 with 2x miniGBIC/SFP, but not much else. Cisco Catalyst 2960 series offers some additional features like USB storage, but I can't imagine I will need that.
Any suggestions?
Thank you
Dan

Hello everyone,
I'm looking for switch to accompany Cisco ASA 5520 in data center, with 20+ GE ports and no need for PoE.
I would like to understand the difference between Cisco SG300-28, Cisco SGE2000 and Cisco Catalyst 2960, 2960-C and 2960-S Series (except specific number of ports). As far as I can see the Cisco SGE2000 has 4x SFP and is stackable unlike the SG300 with 2x miniGBIC/SFP, but not much else. Cisco Catalyst 2960 series offers some additional features like USB storage, but I can't imagine I will need that.
Any suggestions?
Thank you
Dan

Cisco catalyst 2960 booting garbage, help on restore IOS

Dear All,
This is my first time on terminal access of Cisco Catalyst 2960 (2960TC-L), normally would use the web configuration for most task.
Now the switch has an issue with the web interface and when I try to access through terminal, I was greeted with garbage upon the booting of the switch, I searched for the terminal boot process and it wasn't what I was expected for my switch. I was a bit dumbfound now of how can I recover the firmware to its default stage, now that I cannot even boot through its terminal console.
Any help is highly appreciated. Thank you for your time.

Hi,
I just verified with my colleague of whom have done quite a few bits before I took over his task.
His reply was he actually did an IOS flash before, though I'm not sure how he did it, but according to him, it was actually a success and the web interface still works for few times before it become like this.
As I tried another time to goes into root mode (or Admin mode??) for the switch, the steps as I performed below:
1. Refer to cisco-2960-putting-setting.jpg for the settings. I press Open and it does display the console Window, no issue there.
2. I hold the "mode" button on the switch and turn on the switch power, and after few seconds the screen display as such (refer to cisco-2960-putty-output2.jpg), the SYST L.E.D. did flash with following pattern: Green (blink ~15 times) then Orange-Green (repeat blink twice) then Green (stable light), for this I was expecting it to goes off after few seconds but it didn't, I wait about a minute before I let go the "mode" button.
3. After I let go the "mode" button, it goes to the screen (refer cisco-2960-putty-output3.jpg), and the SYST still blinking, possibly infinitely... with the console output screen stays like that... and whatever I entered display weird/garbage characters instead, I can't do anything on it.
Each tries display different weird characters, as the SYST still blinking infinitely.
I'm unsure if I'm giving enough details for online troubleshooting, I'll try my best to give as per instructed.
Thank you for your time.

Error in switch ports POE model, "Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L Switch"

I have problem with the poe switch Cisco Catalyst 2960S-24PS-L posts does not respond, and me the following error resporta was t
%PLATFORM_ENV-3-ILP_PORT_POST_ERR: %s can’t be brought up because it failed POST
in Inline Power test.
he source of that error and what are the possible causes

Hey Dustin,
Device needs to be RMA'ed. The inline power supply has failed.
HTH.
Regards,
RS.

Cisco Catalyst 2960-X and Cisco Prime compatibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for