Cisco & Huawei QinQ interworking

Hello Everybody,
I made have 3 different configuration scenarios. Please find below.
Scen 1. STP works perfectly, PagP channel forms.
Scen 2 STP works perfectly, PagP channel does not form.
Scen 3 nothing works, both SW4 and SW3 think they are the Root Bridge for Vlan 100
Config:
MTU is 1600 for ETH links and 9000 for Gig links
CISCO:
interface FastEthernet0/21
interface FastEthernet0/23
desc toSW3
switchport access vlan 19
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold cdp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold lldp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold stp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold vtp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel stp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point pagp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point lacp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point udld
no cdp enable
interface FastEthernet0/22
interface FastEthernet0/24
desc toSW3
switchport access vlan 20
switchport mode dot1q-tunnel
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold cdp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold lldp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold stp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel drop-threshold vtp 2000
l2protocol-tunnel cdp
l2protocol-tunnel stp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point pagp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point lacp
l2protocol-tunnel point-to-point udld
no cdp enable
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 100
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
HUAWEI
interface Ethernet0/0/21
interface Ethernet0/0/23
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel hgmp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel stp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel lacp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel eoam3ah vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel lldp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel gmrp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel gvrp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel vtp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel cdp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel dtp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel udld vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel pagp vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel pvst+ vlan 19
l2protocol-tunnel sstp vlan 19
interface Ethernet0/0/22
interface Ethernet0/0/24
port link-type dot1q-tunnel
port default vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel hgmp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel stp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel lacp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel eoam3ah vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel lldp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel gmrp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel gvrp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel vtp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel cdp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel dtp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel udld vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel pagp vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel pvst+ vlan 20
l2protocol-tunnel sstp vlan 20
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/1
port link-type trunk
port trunk pvid vlan 100
port trunk allow-pass vlan 2 to 4094
bpdu enable
jumboframe enable 9000
interface GigabitEthernet0/0/2
port hybrid pvid vlan 100
port hybrid tagged vlan 19 to 20
port hybrid untagged vlan 100
jumboframe enable 9000
Any suggestion is welcome... Thx!
Regards,
István

hmm, no1 has any idea? :)

Similar Messages

Cisco huawei mpls l2vpn

Hi All,
While i m doing for the remote ldp formation between this devices of cisco 3600 & huawei 5700,
attached the configs of these 2 nodes.what could be the possible reason for this..
witch(config-router)#do sh mpls l2 vc
Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status
Vl2292 Eth VLAN 2292 10.50.1.1 2292 DOWN
VFI 2293 vfi 10.50.1.1 2293 DOWN
Switch(config-router)#do sh mpls l2 vc det
Local interface: Vl2292 down, line protocol down, Eth VLAN 2292 down
Destination address: 10.50.1.1, VC ID: 2292, VC status: down
Last error: Local peer access circuit is down
Output interface: none, imposed label stack {}
Preferred path: not configured
Default path: no route
No adjacency
Create time: 04:16:50, last status change time: 04:20:09
Last label FSM state change time: 04:16:49
Signaling protocol: LDP, peer unknown
Targeted Hello: 10.50.2.2(LDP Id) -> 10.50.1.1, LDP is DOWN, no binding
Graceful restart: not configured and not enabled
Non stop routing: not configured and not enabled
Status TLV support (local/remote) : enabled/None (no remote binding)
Thanks
anand

Hi Nagendra,
This is directly connected switch for which i ma trying to establish a remote ldp,
sh mpls interfaces, states the tu1 as down, is there anything wrong in here
Switch# show mpls interfaces
Interface IP Tunnel BGP Static Operational
Vlan21 Yes (ldp) No No No Yes
Tunnel1 Yes No No No No
interface Tunnel1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
mpls ip
mpls label protocol ldp
tunnel destination 10.50.1.1
end
also the preferre path in
pseudowire-class TEST
! Incomplete config [Unconfigured or invalid tunnel interface]
encapsulation mpls
preferred-path interface Tunnel1 disable-fallback
! Incomplete or invalid tunnel interface
Please suggest on this..
Thanks
kumar

Xconnect problem VC is down

Hello
I have customer who have two sites and connect between them using SP , the customer only have CE routers and others as "PE & P" on SP side.
The L2TP was working very well , suddenly we found it down , please help.
CE1
ip cef
pseudowire-class CISCO
encapsulation l2tpv3
interworking ethernet
ip local interface Loopback0
interface Loopback0
ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
no cdp enable
xconnect 1.1.1.1 10 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class CISCO
CE2
ip cef
pseudowire-class CISCO
encapsulation l2tpv3
interworking ethernet
ip local interface Loopback0
interface Loopback0
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
no cdp enable
xconnect 2.2.2.2 10 encapsulation l2tpv3 pw-class CISCO
on CE1
XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2
------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
DN ac Gi0/1.20 20(Eth VLAN) UP l2tp 1.1.1.1:10 DN
sh l2tun tunnel all
%No active L2TP tunnels
on Ce2
Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State, S1=Segment1 State, S2=Segment2 State
UP=Up, DN=Down, AD=Admin Down, IA=Inactive, NH=No Hardware
XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2
------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+--
DN ac Fa1.20 20(Eth VLAN) UP l2tp 2.2.2.2:10 DN
sh l2tun tunnel all
%No active L2TP tunnels
Any suggestions , please.
thanks

Hello
Try to configure the below:-
1- Create tunnel "source and destination are the WAN IPs".
2- Do static routes on both sides and next hop should be the tunnel interface with destination " 1.1.1.1" and "2.2.2.2".
Thanks
please rate all useful information

Cisco VPC and Huawei IRF

Hi,
we want to connect cisco VPC and huawei IRF together, Is there anyone has experience?
thank you!
Jeremy

no one answer me, I will discuss this issue with huawei and customer.
you know in china ,they will remove cisco products , we have a lot of problem with this, may be we need a lab to test it

QinQ support on Cisco SUP7L-E?

Current release note for Cisco IOS XE Release 3.2.0XO says:
These sections list the limitations and restrictions for the current release of Cisco IOS software on the Catalyst 4500E series switch.
•802.1q tunneling and related features are not supported.
but in feature navigator there is 802.1q available
- IEEE 802.1Q Tunneling
- Selective QinQ
Sup 6E has support also:
Be aware that 802.1Q requires WS-C4948, WS-C4948-10GE, ME-4924-10GE, WS-C4928-10GE, WS-C4900M, WS-X4013+10GE, WS-X4516, WS-X4516-10GE, or WS-X45-SUP6-E; Layer 2 protocol tunneling is supported on all supervisor engines.

Hi Riccardo,
I checked the tables and for my unterstanding SUP7L-E and SUP7-E are SW feature parity…
Out of the release note:
Additionally, Supevisor Engine 7L-E running Cisco IOS 3.2.0XO has feature parity with Supervisor Engine 7-E running Cisco IOS XE 3.2.0SG.
The feature set for Supervisor Engine 7L-E matches that of Supervisor Engines 7-E
That means Q-in-Q should also work on SUP7L-E within next IOS release (March – May 2012) … or am i wrong?
Thanks
Manuel
Von: rsimoni
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Januar 2012 16:52
An: Linder Manuel (CASSARiUS AG)
Betreff: - Re: QinQ support on Cisco SUP7L-E?
Home
Re: QinQ support on Cisco SUP7L-E?
created by Riccardo Simoni in Other Service Provider Subjects - View the full discussion

Cisco and Huawei switch compatibility

Hi all. In our company we are going to implement VoIP in our regional offices were all the networking equipment is Cisco. We were thinking of using Huawei 8 port PoE switches to which we would connect our Cisco phones and then connect the Huawei switch to the Cisco switch using a trunk.
I was wondering if anyone has experience connecting Cisco and Huawei switches? Are there known problems interconnecting these switches and what should I pay attention to on the Cisco side of things?
We mostly deal with Cisco equipment in our company so connecting/configuring Huawei switches is something new for us.
Thanks in advance for any help.

Hi Igor,
As Glen indicated , the main problem is spanning tree. Huawei switches use mstp where cisco has pvst by default.
The other problem is qos on switch ports for IP Phones. Cisco Switches automatically discover and configure some settings for IP Phones but Huawei will not do any of these by default.
If you are planning to use some L3 configuration on Huawei switches be sure that their administrative distances differ from Cisco.For example , static routes have admin distance of 60 :) Also routing protocols have different admin distances as well.
There are many differences on MPLS functions as well , but I guess they are all out of your scope.
Please let me know if you need further information.
Hope to help,
Kerem

Cisco RV215W and support for Huawei E3276.

I have a number of these devices, bought after testing that the combination did actually Work.
Unfortunately our phone operator (Hi3G Denmark) has shipped the E3276 HiLink version, which seems not to be supported in the RV215W.
Any possibility for support of the Huawei E3276 HiLink in the RV215W firmware?
Best regards
Kristian Hansen

Khansen,
I have reviewed the dongle list for Denmark support and you correct is not supported. If i may suggest try opening a support case with Small Business Support Center. Just keep in mind that demand for this particular dongle would have to be high to support it and add to list.
Dongle list:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/127976/rv215w-supported-dongle-modems

Compatible between Cisco and Huawei

Dear Expert
We have purchased 7 units Huawei access switches, S2700-26TP-EI-AC & 1310 SFP modules from www.huanetwork.com now we plan to add a aggregation switches, for this part, we want to use Cisco WS-C3750X-24S-S, my question is with Huawei GE optical port (with 1310 SFP module), can it connect to Cisco 3750X GE ports (with GLC-LH-SMD). If not we may need to go for Huawei S5700.
Thanks very much.

I know the problem,When I change the native vlan of my S5700-28C-EI ,it's just ok.

Trunking between Huawei S3900 and Cisco catalyst 3750

One of my edge Huawei S3700 switches is dead, I am going to replace it with a Cisco switch Catalyst 3750 series PoE-48 via a trunk link with GE fiber port on both ends, please see the diagram below.
trunk trunk
Core switchrouter<----------S3700<--------------->Cisco Catlyst 3750
I haven’t touch Cisco switch for many years, I would like to ask the following questions:
1.)      Do I need to take any precaution before connecting this Cisco switch into my Huawei network? Only one link between S3700 and C3750, so I don't need worry anout STP? Do I need to worry about Default vlan regarding trunking port?
2.)      I need to use different trucking protocol e.g. 802.1Q etc to interconnect these two switches (S3700-28TP-SI-AC and Catalyst 3750), please see the following configuration:
For C3750:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan (What you want)
switchport trunk allowed vlan (VLANs required)
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast trunk
For S3700:
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
Do you think the configurations above are right?
Do I need to manually enter Duplex and speed options ?
3.)If the configurations are not right, then what are the commands for trucking port/link should I use on the Cisco switch (it uses IOS software) and Huawei switch? Procedures of the commands would be really helpful !
Any information and help would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Regards

Hello
3750 - basic config
================
See as you are using this switch as an host switch you need to make sure ip routing isn't enabled ( it isn't by default)
Also it looks like the s3700 Huawei switch is permitting all vlans and I assuming the default native vlan is 1 ( as is cisco) so no need to specify the native either.
If you are requiring the access ports on this new cisco 3750 to be in multiple vlans then usually cisco to cisco interconnect would ultise VTP for vlan propagation however this wont occur between the Huawei switch, so you will need to manually add the vlans on the switch also.
so to summarize below is a basic host switch config for 3750.
conf t
no ip routing
hostname XXXXXX
username xxxx privilege 15 secret xxxxxxx
service password-encryption
enable secret xxxxx
security passwords min-length xx
security authentication failure rate xx log
aaa new-model aaa authentication login default local
logging buffered 4096
no service udp-small-servers
no service tcp-small-servers
service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime
service timestamps log datetime msec localtime
no ip domain-lookup
spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst
spanning-tree portfast bpduguard default
int vlan x ( this may or not be vlan 1 - its whatever the L3 vlan interface is on the core switch for management connectivity)
ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y.
exit
ip default-gateway x.x.x.x ( ip address of CORE SVI management interface)
vlan x,x,x,x ( add the L2 vlans to the switch as vtp would not be used between the Huawei switch)
exit
int gigx/x
Description Link to Huawei switch
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
no shut
( no need for spanning-tree portfast trunk- this is usually only for ESX host ports)
int rang fa0/1 -48
Description - Access-ports
switchport host
switchport access vlan x (wihout this defaults to vlan 1)
no shut
clock timezone gmt 0
ntp peer
ntp server x.x.x. prefer
res
Paul

Trunk between cisco and huawei

One of my edge Huawei S5700-28C-EI stack switches is dead, I am going to replace it with a Cisco switch Catalyst 3750 series PoE-48 via a trunk link with GE fiber port on both ends, please see the diagram below.
                                  trunk                     trunk
   Core switchrouter<----------S5700<--------------->Cisco Catlyst 3750
I haven’t touch Cisco switch for many years, I would like to ask the following questions:
1.)      Do I need to take any precaution before connecting this Cisco switch into my Huawei network? Only one link between S5700 and C3750, so I don't need worry anout STP? Do I need to worry about Default vlan regarding trunking port?
2.)      I need to use different trucking protocol e.g. 802.1Q etc to interconnect these two switches (S5700 and Catalyst 3750), please see the following configuration:
For C3750:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan (What you want)
switchport trunk allowed vlan (VLANs required)
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast trunk
For S5700:
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
Do you think the configurations above are right?
Do I need to manually enter Duplex and speed options ?
3.)If the configurations are not right, then what are the commands for trucking port/link should I use on the Cisco switch (it uses IOS software) and Huawei switch? Procedures of the commands would be really helpful !
Any information and help would be much appreciated.

I know the problem,When I change the native vlan of my S5700-28C-EI ,it's just ok.

CISCO 6500 VS HUAWEI S9700

I NEED COMPARISON BETWEEN CISCO VS-C6509E-SUP2T vs S9700 , becuse i have a very compettive offer from huawei , really i need to onvince my customer that cisco 6500 is better than huawei 9700 in performance

where is the link that shows theat information
Something that "big" and launching in the next few months will not bet published. You'll need to talk to a Cisco R&S SE to get more information.

Huawei and cisco 做链路捆绑的问题

huawei3552的G1/1,G1/2 and Cisco6509 G6/1,7/1做链路捆绑的问题：
link-aggregation ethernet0/1 to ethernet0/2 both，在通了一会后，Cisco6509 的端口就down掉，而且端口指示灯也灭掉，插到cisco的设备就正常，但华为设备的端口状态正常。重起huawei3552，不行，恢复出厂的配置，Ok。
请问：
1、华为和cisco的设备能否做链路捆绑？
2、如果能做，应该注意哪些参数？
谢谢！

Cisco Trustsec across QinQ provider network

Hi,
We are thinking of using manual CTS encryption on either natively routed ports, or Vlans / SVIs (Nexus 7ks) to form OSPF adjacencies, but need to understand if this will work across a providers QinQ network. It is my understanding that Trustsec encrypts the 802.1q VLAN tag so ultimately the WAN Provider will receive an untagged packet. So in both cases whether we use a natively routed port, or a Vlan with SVIs, the frames will be untagged.
So I suppose what I am asking is: Can a QinQ WAN provider accept untagged frames, or do frames have to ingress into the providers network with an underlying Vlan Tag in place?
Thanks in advance.
Chris.

Hi Chris,
from my tests MacSEC (manual CTS) does not work across QinQ because gcm-encrypt does authenticate via 802.1x (EAPOL frames). And EAPOL ist not tunneled. EAPOL is grabbed by the QinQ interface.
br Fritz

Problem with sip trunk between CCM and Huawei through Cisco ASA5520

Hello,
I have a next problem
During SIP conversation ASA is changing the ip address of CCM to corresponding name in ASA configuration inside the SIP packet:
To: <sip:443230282@Server_CCM1;user=phone>
ASA name configuration:
name x.y.z.h Server_CCM1
But it should be without any changes like that: To: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>. Because of that session cant be established. Remote SIP peer gives an error "Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing URL"
When name was deleted in ASA "no name x.y.z.h Server_CCM1" we have no any problem with SIP initialization and call proccesing.
We are going to upgrade ASA from 8.2 to 8.3 and it seems that we will have the same problem because object will be created automaticly in new version (we are using a NAT) and we will not be able to delete an object like we did in version 8.2.
What configuration in ASA version 8.3 should be done to avoid this issue.
P.S Detailed debug from Huawei in attachment.
Thank you.

Hi.
depending on your config, you might be hitting CSCta16361, this is fixed in 8.2(4)
if you can confirm it's still happening in latest 8.2 release, then a TAC case needs to be opened so investigation is done and a new bug is opened.
if you've tested 8.2(4) already and it's still doing the same, then a TAC Service Request should be opened for more investigation and possibly opening a new defect.
Best regards,
Fadi.
does this answer your question? if yes please mark it resolved.

Call/video not working between Cisco jabber for Windows and VCS control C40s

Hello,
I've been struggling with no luck how to make a call using Cisco Jabber for Windows 9.6.0 registered to CM 8.6.2 with intercluster ICT to another CM 8.6.2 where we have a VCS Control 7.0.2 via GK H225, and all C40s are registered as H.323.
The VCS has interworking between H323 and SIP, however not sure if there is any problem with that. Assuming it is ok, not sure either if I'm facing any interoperability issue because in my remote site I have C40 (H323 registered at VCS and SIP listening mode) and cisco jabber for windows which is SIP based.
If is not possible, would I be able to change my C40 from H323 to SIP at VCS, or have both H323/SIP registered at VCS? If so, will I need to change as well instead of GK I'll have to establish a SIP Trunk between the CM and VCS?
Another thing I do not believe either I would be able to have one VCS connected with two clusters, right?
I'm just trying to find a solution in case my current topology is not compatible, but feel free if you have any better idea to make it work.
Anyway here is what is happening:
When I make a call from my cisco jabber windows to C40 using alias number. The call is being redirected just fine to the C40 and it rings, however when someoene or the auto answer picks it up, the call dropped right away.
However, if I enabled the MTP in my CSF device, the call gets longer before dropping. I was even able to see my jabber " start video" turns green, before was grayed out all the time and the call dropped faster. I hear a fast busy tone.
I'm able to provide SDI traces, logs, diagnostic sip/h323 calls from VCS in order to know for sure if this is an incompatible issue or something I can workaround.
Let me know if someone of you are interested in read these logs or could point me on the right direction.
Thanks!

Ok,
I have looked at both logs. I have to mentinon though that you didnt
provide the log that shows the h323 setup between cucm and the VCS. This
is most likely because the call originated from a different cucm than
the ones you provided the logs from.
The call would have orginated from the first cucm in the cucm group of
this trunk: Name=RL_TRUNK_VIDEO
The cucm ip will be : 10.252.53.10.
This is the VCS log that confirms where the h323 request originated
from:
pr 10 22:50:29 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:29,187"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="54000"
Received RAS PDU:
Having said that here is my analysis of the logs that you sent..
Jabber sent an INVITE to CUCM and advertised all the codecs (audio and
video it can support)..
Observer that Jabber says it doesnt support G729 anexB
21:55:16.576 |//SIP/SIPTcp/wait_SdlReadRsp: Incoming SIP TCP message
from 10.223.20.73 on port 54677 index 90661 with 2220 bytes:
[862370,NET]
INVITE sip:[email protected];user=phone SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.223.20.73:54677;branch=z9hG4bK000029d3
From: "4122107" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=00059a3c78000011000070b0
-00000e65
To: <sip:[email protected]>
Call-ID: [email protected]
Max-Forwards: 70
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 01:55:16 GMT
CSeq: 101 INVITE
User-Agent: Cisco-CSF/9.4.1
m=audio 19252 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 105 104 101
c=IN IP4 10.223.20.73
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000
a=fmtp:18 annexb=no
a=rtpmap:105 G7221/16000
a=fmtp:105 bitrate=24000
a=rtpmap:104 G7221/16000
a=fmtp:104 bitrate=32000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-15
a=sendrecv
m=video 28878 RTP/AVP 97
c=IN IP4 10.223.20.73
++++Now lets observer the capabilites exchange during h245 negotiation
between cucm and VCS++++
Here CUCM advertises its caps to VCS (afterreceiving caps from VCS)
Note that G729A, G729AB, G729 is all advertised..
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,017"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="45660"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : terminalCapabilitySet
capabilityTableEntryNumber 2,
       capability receiveAudioCapability :
g729wAnnexB : 6
       capabilityTableEntryNumber 3,
   capability receiveAudioCapability : g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 6
       capabilityTableEntryNumber 4,
       capability
receiveAudioCapability : g729 : 6
capabilityTableEntryNumber 5,
       capability receiveAudioCapability :
g729AnnexA : 6
++++++
After doing MSD (master slave determination, we move to the OLC phas e..
Here we see that the far end..c40 wants to use G729AB for media++++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,783"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.224.114.11" Src-
port="11163"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : openLogicalChannel :
   forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
forwardLogicalChannelParameters
     dataType audioData :
g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 20,
     multiplexParameters
h2250LogicalChannelParameters :
+++Next VCS sends G729AB as the codec to use to CUCM+++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,784"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Dst-ip="10.252.53.10" Dst-
port="45660"
Sending H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= request : openLogicalChannel :
   forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
forwardLogicalChannelParameters
     dataType audioData :
g729AnnexAwAnnexB : 20,
     multiplexParameters
h2250LogicalChannelParameters :
++++The next thing we get is an OLC reject from CUCM and this is where
th call drops++
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,790"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="45660"
Received H.245 PDU:
value MultimediaSystemControlMessage
::= response : openLogicalChannelReject :
forwardLogicalChannelNumber 1,
   cause dataTypeNotSupported : NULL
Apr 10 22:50:31 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:31,790"
Module="network.h323" Level="INFO": Dst-ip="10.224.114.11" Dst-
port="11163"
Detail="Sending H.245 OpenLogicalChannelRejResponse
+++We then receive a call release from cucm with cause code of 47:
resource unavailable++++
Apr 10 22:50:32 TWELDVCS01 tvcs: UTCTime="2014-04-11 01:50:32,365"
Module="network.h323" Level="DEBUG": Src-ip="10.252.53.10" Src-
port="50913"
Received H.225 PDU:
Q931
   Message Type: Release
Complete
   Call reference flag: Message sent from originating side
Call reference value: 0x7b
   Info Element : Cause
     Location: Usr
   Cause Value: Resource unavailable
   Info Element : User User
   Length = 22
Suggestions:
Change the region setting between the ICT trunk to VCS and Jabber to use
G711 and test again.

Cisco & Huawei QinQ interworking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for