Trunk between cisco and huawei
One of my edge Huawei S5700-28C-EI stack switches is dead, I am going to replace it with a Cisco switch Catalyst 3750 series PoE-48 via a trunk link with GE fiber port on both ends, please see the diagram below.
trunk trunk
Core switchrouter<----------S5700<--------------->Cisco Catlyst 3750
I haven’t touch Cisco switch for many years, I would like to ask the following questions:
1.) Do I need to take any precaution before connecting this Cisco switch into my Huawei network? Only one link between S5700 and C3750, so I don't need worry anout STP? Do I need to worry about Default vlan regarding trunking port?
2.) I need to use different trucking protocol e.g. 802.1Q etc to interconnect these two switches (S5700 and Catalyst 3750), please see the following configuration:
For C3750:
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan (What you want)
switchport trunk allowed vlan (VLANs required)
switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast trunk
For S5700:
port link-type trunk
port trunk permit vlan all
Do you think the configurations above are right?
Do I need to manually enter Duplex and speed options ?
3.)If the configurations are not right, then what are the commands for trucking port/link should I use on the Cisco switch (it uses IOS software) and Huawei switch? Procedures of the commands would be really helpful !
Any information and help would be much appreciated.
I know the problem,When I change the native vlan of my S5700-28C-EI ,it's just ok.
Similar Messages
-
Problem with sip trunk between CCM and Huawei through Cisco ASA5520
Hello,
I have a next problem
During SIP conversation ASA is changing the ip address of CCM to corresponding name in ASA configuration inside the SIP packet:
To: <sip:443230282@Server_CCM1;user=phone>
ASA name configuration:
name x.y.z.h Server_CCM1
But it should be without any changes like that: To: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>. Because of that session cant be established. Remote SIP peer gives an error "Bad Request - 'Malformed/Missing URL"
When name was deleted in ASA "no name x.y.z.h Server_CCM1" we have no any problem with SIP initialization and call proccesing.
We are going to upgrade ASA from 8.2 to 8.3 and it seems that we will have the same problem because object will be created automaticly in new version (we are using a NAT) and we will not be able to delete an object like we did in version 8.2.
What configuration in ASA version 8.3 should be done to avoid this issue.
P.S Detailed debug from Huawei in attachment.
Thank you.Hi.
depending on your config, you might be hitting CSCta16361, this is fixed in 8.2(4)
if you can confirm it's still happening in latest 8.2 release, then a TAC case needs to be opened so investigation is done and a new bug is opened.
if you've tested 8.2(4) already and it's still doing the same, then a TAC Service Request should be opened for more investigation and possibly opening a new defect.
Best regards,
Fadi.
does this answer your question? if yes please mark it resolved. -
Compatible between Cisco and Huawei
Dear Expert
We have purchased 7 units Huawei access switches, S2700-26TP-EI-AC & 1310 SFP modules from www.huanetwork.com now we plan to add a aggregation switches, for this part, we want to use Cisco WS-C3750X-24S-S, my question is with Huawei GE optical port (with 1310 SFP module), can it connect to Cisco 3750X GE ports (with GLC-LH-SMD). If not we may need to go for Huawei S5700.
Thanks very much.I know the problem,When I change the native vlan of my S5700-28C-EI ,it's just ok.
-
How to create multiple sip trunks between cucm and cisco unified sip proxy
Dear Expert,
Is there a way to create multiple sip trunks between CUCM and Cisco Unified SIP Proxy (CUSP)? How to achieve it without creating multiple IP interfaces on the CUSP module.
CUCM: 8.5.1.10000-9
CUSP: 8.5.2
Thank you,
.wanHello Michael,
This SIP trunk is part of UCCE solution, which used between CVP, CUSP, and CUCM.
The requirements:
1) To have different codecs for different type of calls, as the phones are at few countries
2) To pass different number of digits from CUSP to CUCM for different call treatments
.wan -
Cisco and Huawei switch compatibility
Hi all. In our company we are going to implement VoIP in our regional offices were all the networking equipment is Cisco. We were thinking of using Huawei 8 port PoE switches to which we would connect our Cisco phones and then connect the Huawei switch to the Cisco switch using a trunk.
I was wondering if anyone has experience connecting Cisco and Huawei switches? Are there known problems interconnecting these switches and what should I pay attention to on the Cisco side of things?
We mostly deal with Cisco equipment in our company so connecting/configuring Huawei switches is something new for us.
Thanks in advance for any help.Hi Igor,
As Glen indicated , the main problem is spanning tree. Huawei switches use mstp where cisco has pvst by default.
The other problem is qos on switch ports for IP Phones. Cisco Switches automatically discover and configure some settings for IP Phones but Huawei will not do any of these by default.
If you are planning to use some L3 configuration on Huawei switches be sure that their administrative distances differ from Cisco.For example , static routes have admin distance of 60 :) Also routing protocols have different admin distances as well.
There are many differences on MPLS functions as well , but I guess they are all out of your scope.
Please let me know if you need further information.
Hope to help,
Kerem -
CUCM - trunking between 7 and 9
Hi,
Document needed to do a trunking between cucm 7 and cucm 9 ( intercluster trunking)
We are planning to route a PSTN call from IP phones which are registerd with old CUCM on version 7 from our new cucm 9 which has FXO- line active.
how do I achive it.
RegardsHello
You have to use intercluster non-gatekeeper controlled . I do nothink there is special document for this , but you can see the below link:-
https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/11766291/intercluster-sip-trunk-between-cucm-version-71-and-91
Thanks
please rate all useful ifnromation -
Trunking between 7613 and GSR (12416)
Can these 2 devices support gig etherchannelling? I need to trunk 3 gig ethernet between 7613 and 12416. GSR does support portchannels but to allow trunking dot1q must be configured. If any one is doing this please print a sample config.
Thanks.According to the Q&A as below. The Fast and Gigabit Etherchannel is not supported in GSR12000. And it do support 802.1q.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps167/products_qanda_item09186a0080094a71.shtml#n17
Below is the config, sample for dot1q for VLAN 10 :
interface gigabitethernet 3/1.1
encapsulation dot1q 10
ip address 172.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_guide09186a00800e9556.html#31333
Hope this helps. -
Trunking between 2960X and 3560G
I am trying to trunk between a Cisco 2960X and a 3560G switch. The 2960X has a 10gig (SFP) interface and the 3560G has a 1gig (SFP) interface. Can I do this with 1gig SFP modules? If so what is the configuration on both switches because I can't get them to come up. This what I have.
2960X config
interface TenGigabitEthernet3/0/2
switchport mode trunk
3560G config
interface GigabitEthernet0/28
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunkI looked at my 2960X, but I don't have one that has a 1Gig-Module in a SFP+ slot. But at least it is documented to work:
The SFP+ slots support both SFP and SFP+ modules
Are you sure you don't have just a send/receive mismatch? Sometimes the easy things are the hardest to find ... ;-) -
Link Local BGP peering between Cisco and Juniper (M-Series)
Hi,
has anybody successfully managed to get a working IPv6 session between a Cisco and a Juniper router using Link Local IPs?
I got it working between two cisco routers and two Juniper Routers but not with the two different vendors.
Configuration on the Juniper site:
family inet6 {
address FE80::1/64;
protocols {
bgp {
group customer_ipv6 {
neighbor fe80::2 {
local-interface at-2/0/0.119;
peer-as 65300;
as-override;
Configuration on the Cisco site:
interface ATM0/0/0.1 point-to-point
bandwidth 2033
ip address 10.194.235.42 255.255.255.252
ip access-group AL-SECURITY-WAN out
ip mtu 1500
ipv6 address FE80::2 link-local
ipv6 enable
bfd interval 999 min_rx 999 multiplier 15
pvc 1/32
vbr-nrt 2244 2244 1
tx-ring-limit 3
encapsulation aal5snap
router bgp 65300
bgp router-id 10.213.58.185
bgp log-neighbor-changes
no bgp default ipv4-unicast
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 remote-as 65300
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 version 4
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 remote-as 65300
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 version 4
address-family ipv4
exit-address-family
address-family ipv6
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 activate
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 advertisement-interval 5
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 route-map NH6 out
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 activate
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 advertisement-interval 5
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 route-map NH6 out
exit-address-family
CE_HOSTNAME# show ip bgp ipv6 uni su
BGP router identifier 10.213.58.185, local AS number 65300
BGP table version is 7, main routing table version 7
4 network entries using 656 bytes of memory
4 path entries using 320 bytes of memory
1/1 BGP path/bestpath attribute entries using 128 bytes of memory
2 BGP AS-PATH entries using 48 bytes of memory
2 BGP community entries using 48 bytes of memory
0 BGP route-map cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
BGP using 1200 total bytes of memory
BGP activity 34/12 prefixes, 38/12 paths, scan interval 60 secs
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down State/PfxRcd
FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1
4 65300 0 0 1 0 0 never Idle
FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1
4 65300 15 16 7 0 0 00:10:59 4
CE_HOSTNAME#
The console monitoring states the following:
Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
de-ipc-ulmdon-ce-02#
Nov 10 06:30:33.023 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent
The Cisco Router is running IOS 15.2, the Juniper Site JunOS 10.4
Any Ideas how I can get this to work?
Thanks in advance!Marcin,
I updated the debugging log, the previous one was created using override-capability-neg on the neighbor (experimental).
>>0) Do you see similar scenario for working session? (Between two Cisco routers)
The working connection between two cisco routers doesn't show any output
>>1) What verion of IOS are you running? Something failrly recent I hope?
Show Version:
Cisco IOS Software, C1900 Software (C1900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(1)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2011 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 19-Sep-11 16:24 by prod_rel_team
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
CE_HOSTNAME uptime is 2 weeks, 5 days, 21 hours, 35 minutes
System returned to ROM by reload at 18:43:21 MET(S) Fri Oct 21 2011
System restarted at 18:44:50 MET(S) Fri Oct 21 2011
System image file is "flash:c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.152-1.T1.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
Last reload reason: Reload Command
This product contains cryptographic features and is subject to United
States and local country laws governing import, export, transfer and
use. Delivery of Cisco cryptographic products does not imply
third-party authority to import, export, distribute or use encryption.
Importers, exporters, distributors and users are responsible for
compliance with U.S. and local country laws. By using this product you
agree to comply with applicable laws and regulations. If you are unable
to comply with U.S. and local laws, return this product immediately.
A summary of U.S. laws governing Cisco cryptographic products may be found at:
http://www.cisco.com/wwl/export/crypto/tool/stqrg.html
If you require further assistance please contact us by sending email to
[email protected].
Cisco CISCO1941/K9 (revision 1.0) with 446464K/77824K bytes of memory.
Processor board ID FCZ1504C0G8
1 DSL controller
2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces
1 ATM interface
1 terminal line
DRAM configuration is 64 bits wide with parity disabled.
255K bytes of non-volatile configuration memory.
250880K bytes of ATA System CompactFlash 0 (Read/Write)
License Info:
License UDI:
Device# PID SN
*0 CISCO1941/K9 FCZ1504C0G8
Technology Package License Information for Module:'c1900'
Technology Technology-package Technology-package
Current Type Next reboot
ipbase ipbasek9 Permanent ipbasek9
security None None None
data datak9 Permanent datak9
Configuration register is 0x2102
>>2) Can we have some more info from Juniper side (logs/debugs).
Sadly not. The Juniper Traceoptions don't show anything
All I can offer you at this point is the neighbor show command:
user@Juniper> show bgp neighbor fe80::2 instance vrf-test
Peer: fe80::2 AS 65300 Local: unspecified AS 20570
Type: External State: Idle Flags:
Last State: NoState Last Event: NoEvent
Last Error: None
Export: [ pol-standard-bgp-export ] Import: [ pol-standard-bgp-import ]
Options:
Options:
Address families configured: inet6-unicast
Path-attributes dropped: 128
Holdtime: 90 Preference: 170
Number of flaps: 0
Trace options: all
Trace file: /var/log/bgp_ipv6_ll_20111110 size 131072 files 10
user@Juniper> show bgp summary instance vrf-test
Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 1
Table Tot Paths Act Paths Suppressed History Damp State Pending
vrf-2.inet.0 37 16 0 0 0 0
vrf-.inet6.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
vrf-24.mdt.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peer AS InPkt OutPkt OutQ Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped...
10.194.235.42 65300 1149 1076 0 1 8:44:00 Establ
vrf-test.inet.0: 6/7/7/0
fe80::2 65300 0 0 0 0 9:38:32 Idle
>>3)
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) Keep alive timer fired.
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) service keepalive IO request.
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) Keep alive timer fired.
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) service keepalive IO request.
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:52.850 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Idle to Active
Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 open active, local address FE80::2
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Adding topology IPv6 Unicast:base
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send OPEN
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Active to OpenSent
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 65300, holdtime 180 seconds, ID AD53AB9
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 10
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive OPEN
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 90 seconds
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 0
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from OpenSent to Closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send NOTIFICATION 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 3, length (excl. header) 2
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active bad state change from Closing to Closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: -Traceback= 21B3370Cz 21B33C74z 21B34258z
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Multicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF delete stale NSF not active
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF no stale paths state is NSF not active
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Session close and reset neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 topostate
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Closing to Idle
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent
CE_HOSTNAME#CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) Keep alive timer fired.
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: ses global 10.194.235.41 (0x2970EDA4:1) service keepalive IO request.
Nov 10 15:35:49.574 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) Keep alive timer fired.
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE requested (bgp_keepalive_timer_expired)
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 (0x316FBDDC:1) service keepalive IO request.
Nov 10 15:35:50.598 MET: BGP: FE80::2%GigabitEthernet0/1 KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:52.850 MET: BGP: 10.194.235.41 received KEEPALIVE, length (excl. header) 0
CE_HOSTNAME#
Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Idle to Active
Nov 10 15:35:54.694 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 open active, local address FE80::2
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Adding topology IPv6 Unicast:base
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send OPEN
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Active to OpenSent
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active sending OPEN, version 4, my as: 65300, holdtime 180 seconds, ID AD53AB9
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.698 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active KEEPALIVE write request serviced in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active service 2 read request in BGP_IO
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 1, length (excl. header) 10
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive OPEN
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN, version 4, holdtime 90 seconds
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 0
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from OpenSent to Closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Send NOTIFICATION 2/7 (unsupported/disjoint capability) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-4-MSGDUMP: unsupported or mal-formatted message received from FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1:
FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF FFFF 001D 0104 505A 005A 52D2 C023 00
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active rcv message type 3, length (excl. header) 2
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active bad state change from Closing to Closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: -Traceback= 21B3370Cz 21B33C74z 21B34258z
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv4 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl VPNv6 Unicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: tbl IPv4 Multicast:base Service reset requests
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF delete stale NSF not active
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) NSF no stale paths state is NSF not active
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active closing
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: ses global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 (0x296337B4:0) act Session close and reset neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 topostate
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: nbr_topo global FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast:base (0x296337B4:0) Resetting ALL counters.
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: BGP: FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 active went from Closing to Idle
Nov 10 15:35:54.702 MET: %BGP_SESSION-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor FE80::1%ATM0/0/0.1 IPv6 Unicast topology base removed from session BGP Notification sent
CE_HOSTNAME# -
We have to implement Voice over IP on our IPLC circuit between foreign office and India office.
Topology is such that our foreign office is having 1700 series router with wan card
(Wic-1T) and one two port FXO card connected to PBX for PSTN and local connectivity.
India end we have a cisco 1700 router with wan card (Wic-1T) and on lan we have Avaya S8300 media server with multiple phones connected to it. Avaya server is acting as a voice gateway at India end. Avaya server is connected to LAN on Ethernet.
We have configured IPSEC site-to-site VPN between both the locations.
Requirement:-
Over the VPN tunnel we want to enable voice communication between both the locations.
i.e between cisco at foreign end and avaya server at India end.
1) India office users via IPLC should communicate over voice and data with the foreign office (Avaya extensions to FXO in Foreign office).
2) Foreign office should communicate with the india office users connected to IPLC link (FXO to Avaya server extensions)
Any suggestions/config will be appreciated
Attaching the india end router config.
ThanksHi
Before getting onto the requirements,from now on i would suggest you to mask the ip (public) address part included in the configs while posting in any general forum.
These are the links which you can use up here for the ref..
You need to check out for the possible codes and other compatible points which you need to configure on both the sidees..
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a008009431b.shtml
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps259/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008007e606.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080080afd.html
i m not sure though about the configuration of Avaya box but you can mention the remote end routers ethernet ip as the destination ip or the target for the call termination.
And in the remote router while configuring the dial-peer pots and dial-peer voip binded on the FXO itnerface make sure that you are mentioning the Avaya box ip as the session target.
regds -
Newbie: trunk between 6500 and Blade Switch 3020
Hi,
Beeing newbie , I need advice to setup trunk between my 2 switches.
I would like to use 4 ports as TRUNK
On the 6500 , this is what I have done :
set port channel 5/37-40 61
set trunk 5/37 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/38 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/39 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
set trunk 5/40 auto isl 1-1005,1025-4094
On the Blade Switch 3020 I have done :
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/19
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
switchport trunk encapsulation isl
switchport mode trunk
shutdown
channel-group 1 mode on
Will that work ?
Could you tell me if I have to put the trunk port on the same VLAN ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
regards
Davidversion 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname Lux-bl-sw1
enable secret xxx
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
no file verify auto
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
interface Port-channel1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/5
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/6
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/7
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/8
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/9
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/10
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/11
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/12
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/13
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/14
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/15
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/16
switchport access vlan 181
speed 1000
spanning-tree portfast
interface GigabitEthernet0/17
interface GigabitEthernet0/18
interface GigabitEthernet0/19
interface GigabitEthernet0/20
interface GigabitEthernet0/21
interface GigabitEthernet0/22
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
interface GigabitEthernet0/24
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface Vlan181
ip address xxx.xx.x.xxx 255.255.0.0
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway xxx.xx.x.xx
ip http server
control-plane
line con 0
line vty 0 4
password fsv14m
login
line vty 5 15
password fsv14m
login
end
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type
Gi0/1 connected 181 full 1000 1000BaseX
Gi0/2 connected 181 full 1000 1000BaseX
Gi0/17 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/18 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/19 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi0/20 notconnect 1 auto auto Not Present
Gi0/21 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/22 notconnect 1 auto auto 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/23 connected trunk a-full a-1000 10/100/1000BaseTX
Gi0/24 notconnect 1 auto auto 10/100/1000BaseTX
Po1 notconnect 1 auto auto
Fa0 connected routed full a-100 10/100BaseTX
We saw that all the ports on the gig switch are set to be trunk by default.
trunk works
I need to investigate how to setup a ether channel trunk ( to have a 4 gig trunk instead of 4*1 gig ) -
Trunk between Cisco Catalyst and DLINK DES-7210
Hi,
i would like to configure a Trunk with all VLANs between a Cisco Catalyst 3650 an a DLINK DES-7210.
On the DLINK is the def. GW via VRRP defined.
Now i get the following Error:
%ARP-4-DUPADDR: Duplicate address 172.28.72.1 on interface VLAN 72 port TenGigabitEthernet 5/3, sourced by 24e9.b397.2c34
This is the Uplink Interface on the Cisco Switch.
What can cause this?
here`s the config of the Cisco Port:
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1/4
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
load-interval 30
udld port disable
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
end
sh inter trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Te1/1/4 on 802.1q trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Te1/1/4 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Te1/1/4 1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Te1/1/4 1,8,12,16,20-24,32,36,40,44,48,56,64,68,72,76,80,88,92,96,201,211,239-242,244-249,260,264,268,1212,1216,1220,1224,1228,1232,1234,1236,1240,1244,1248,1252,1256,1260,1264,1268
and here is the DLINK Switch:
interface TenGigabitEthernet 5/3
switchport mode trunk
description test
sh int ten 5/3 trunk
Interface Mode Native VLAN VLAN lists
TenGigabitEthernet 5/3 On 1 ALLDo you have the same IP configured on both switches ?
Jon -
Trunking between Pix and pvlans
Hi,
I already wrote here for this problem, but no one answered me, so I'm trying again sending the question in a different mode.. :-))
I've a Cisco Switch (Catalyst 6500) and a Cisco Firewall (Pix 535). On the switch, I configured various pvlan, then I associated them to primary vlans.
On the Pix, I created logical interfaces with the same vlans of the switch. The question is: Why the trunk doesn't work? I know that trunking of pvlan between switches works without problems.. I cannot trunk pvlans between a switch and a firewall. If I try to trunk a simply vlan, it works! I don't find documentation about this.. Can you please help me?? Do you think it may be a software version problem??
Many thanks to all!!
If you think it's useful, I can post pix and switch main steps configurations..
Regards and kisses!! :-)
DanielaHi Robert,
The SG200 is a layer 2 switch and the SG300 is defaulted as a layer 2 switch. Lets say your default vlan is 1 for each switch. You may create vlan 10. Then configure the port between each switch as 1u, 10t. This will allow vlan 1 and 10 to communicate. Next, if you assign any port as an access port to vlan 10, anything connecting to a vlan 10 port on the same subnet will talk to each other.
View this picture below; The vlan 10 computers will communicate to each other ONLY on vlan 10. Since this is layer 2 networking, the vlan id will separate the layer 2 traffic while the layer 3 information is separate by subnet. In a fully functional network, the router would need to support the multiple subnet, either through subinterfaces, multiple IP interface or dot1q trunks. If you introduced a router to this mix, the vlan 1 subnet will get to the internet while the vlan 10 subnet will not.
-Tom
Please rate helpful posts -
Unable to fully form trunks between 3850 and 4503-E switches
Hi all,
This last weekend I tried to replace a stack of 3750G's with a stack of new 3850's.
The stack of switches has 2 fibre uplinks to the core switches (4503-E).
It didn't go well, and I had to revert the project.
The stack was all pre-configured in the workshop but could not be tested on the live LAN. When I connected it , I first connected up 1 of the 2 uplinks. The link went to UP status, and I could see the remote core switch via CDP, but it would not learn the VLANs (VTP was setup correctly), and looking at the port on the switch, it flashed green, went solid green, then flashed amber slowly. This cycled continuously, whilst the link status remained up and no errors were logged by either switch.
I debugged spanning-tree but nothing stood out. I tried a replacement SFP, and a different slot but no difference.
I re-connected one of the old 3750's and immediately the link came up stable, and everything was fine.
I then erased the config on the new stack, and simply set the fibre port as trunk, with udld enabled (matching the remote end) (neither switch supports ISL, so the trunk is dot1q). The same issue persisted.
Last night I spent a few hours in the office investigating. I grabbed a spare 3560G from the store, configured a fibre port as a trunk, and connected this to the 3850's, and this worked fine. I then provisioned a new fibre port on the core 4503-E and connected this up using brand new fibre tails, but had exactly the same issues as described above.
The switches were running cat3k_caa-iosd-universalk9.SPA.150-1.EX3, and I have upgraded them to cat3k_caa-universalk9.SPA.03.03.01.SE.150-1.EZ1.bin as part of my troubleshooting but this has not made a difference.
Does anyone have any advice? I am starting to wish I spec'd 3750X's instead!!
ThanksTim,
From the 3850 install guide
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/hardware/installation/guide/3850_hig/HIGOVERV.html#wp1263129
Table 1-13 NETWORK MODULE LEDs
Color
NETWORK MODULE Link Status
Off
Link is off.
Green
Link is on, no activity.
Blinking green
Activity on a link, no faults.
Note The LED will blink green even if there is very little control traffic.
Blinking amber
Link is off due to a fault or because it has exceeded a limit set in the switch software.
Caution Link faults occur when noncompliant cabling is connected to an SFP or SFP+ port. Use only standard-compliant cabling to connect to Cisco SFP and SFP+ ports. You must remove from the network any cable or device that causes a link fault.
Amber
Link for the SFP or SFP+ has been disabled.
What kind of SFPs are in the 3850
What kind if GBICs are in the 4500
What is the spec of your fibre cable & patches
Regards,
Alex.
Please rate useful posts. -
Troubleshooting Trunking between 3560 and a WS-C6509-E
I have both sides configured the same on these two switches but I can not ping the ip's on the other side from the 6509.
int Gig3/3
Switchport
Switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan allowed 192-195, 253, 254, 999
switchport mode trunk
I have use the command sh int trunk and everything appears to be trunking just fine. Those Vlan's are created on both sides. What other commands can I use to rule out a trunking problem? I keep trying to ping the ip address on the 3560 (*.*192.1) from the 6509. and still not joy.The show int trunk command should confirm that trunking is correct between the switches. However, we need to know what vlan id you are using for management. Also, we need to see the output of the management vlans on each switch. Also, check the show ip int brief command and make sure your management vlans are up up. They need to look like this:
Vlan631 10.6.31.1 YES manual up up
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I know if I can update my Ipad 2 without it being locked by itunes ?
I want to update my Ipad, Can I normaly update it on Itunes, or it may lock it afterwards ? (Like for some of the Iphones, when you update them, they will lock ) If it may lock, how can i check ? Thanks
-
Best way to resize a graphic for slideshow
Just a small issue I'm sure, but I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle this. I have a slide show set up with photos of various sizes. Some of the shots are landscape and the others portrait. I have a custom shadow I want at the bottom of ea
-
Scheduled thread pools and blocking
Hello, I am using a scheduled thread pool created in the following way: ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool();I want to schedule a task on the scheduler, but this task uses a MulticastSocket and can block on: byte[]
-
10.4.6 To install or not install???
I have read some scary things on this board in regard to going from 10.4.4 to 10.4.5 or 10.4.6. I am currently running 10.4.4 on a PPC and I want to upgrade to 10.4.6. I have read about issues with Adobe products and these upgrades. I am running Phot
-
I have a partition on my IMac disk and Windows 7 loaded on one partition. I tried to open and W7 will not open and cannot repair itself. Is there a diagnostic/disk repair from Apple that I can try before reloading W7?