CJ88 and AUC

hi expert SAP,
when i use to cj88 to AUC the decimals value are in Depreciation Area.
i see it too in Asset explorer and Report Raitar01.
Its a big error fiscal on system, it ' s no real have a one depreciation value on a AUC.
I usin a realese 4,6 C.
Someone know some notes OSS?
Tanx for the attention

ok,
tanks

Similar Messages

KO88 - Error when settling for Cost Center AND Auc for the same Internal Or

Hi Experts,
We need to configure Investment Internal Orders that could settle to both Cost Center and Auc, but each assignments with different Source Cost Elements
We did the following:
1. Created Auc Class
2. Created Investment Profile "IMOBIL" and assigned to Auc Class, flagging Auc
3. Created Allocation Structure "CV" with two assignments:
01, Source = Cost elements 7000000000 to 7999999999, receiver AUC "by cost element"
02 Source = Cost elements 4000000000 to 4999999999, receiver CTR "by cost element"
4. Created Model Order, filling the Investment Profile IMOBIL created in step 2.
5 Created Settlement Profile ZCV0001, assigning Allocation Strucutre CV, allowing CTR and AUC for receivers, default receiver is "FXA", doc type "AA".
6 Created ORder Type CV01, assigning Settlement Profile ZCV0001.
When I post only for Asset Expenses (Source Cost element 7, Assigment 01), the settlement through KO88 correctly settles to AUC, and also creates the settlement rule for cost center (i'm using the strategy to create from Responsible Cost Center).
But when I post for Asset Expenses (cost elements 7, receiver AUC) AND General Expenses (Source Cost element 4, receiver CTR), KO88 generates an error KD506, saying that for Assigment 02 - AUC I didnt define a settlement cost element.
1. Assignment 02 is not AUC, is CTR;
2. I flagged "by cost element", so I don't need a settlement cost element. And also, I was able to post to AUC when the source posting was only for cost element 7.
Did you face any problem like this?
I cannot find out what is the missing configuration, or if it is a program error...
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

Hi Ajay
I already created Source Structure and assigned to my Setllement profile (so I assigned Allocation Structure AND Source Structure).
I don't understand when you say that I need to assign the Source Sutrcture in each rule....because the Source structure is in the Settlement Parameters valid for both rules...
When I post to Asset Expenses only for the internal Order, the 2 rules (CTR and AUC) are created when I run KO88 (but only AUC rule is settled). This is OK.
The problem is when I post for both General Expenses AND Asset Expenses, the system is not recognizing that I have 2 source structures, neither is findind that for CTR AND AUC the Settlement cost elements are the original cost elements.
I'm thinking about changing message KD506 to warning, do you know if this can help?
Kind Regards
Mayumi Blak

About Group asset and auc

When i creat asset for auc but after the settelement ,i want to settel this asset in main asset ,when i cerat main asset the required group asset and sub numbe ,so please tell be the relation between main asset ,group asset and auc.
Regards,
Pramod Kulkarni.

1.ASSET CLASSES
First you create three asset classes for:
ex:
   ASSET CLASS                              NUMBER RANGE
1.Plant & machinery                               100-200
2.Plant& Machinery for Group Assets-     500-600
3.Plant & Machinery AUC                       1000-1100
2.CREATE ASSETS
First you create AUCEX; 1000
THEN POST THE TRANSACTIONS
3.If you want settele thisauc to fixed asset.
a. first you create group asset ex: 500
b. then create Fixed asset ex: 100
at the time of creation of Fixed asset , you have to mention in tehasset masster what is the Group asset no:
for ex; with in 100 you have to mention 500.
Then settele the AUC TO fIXED ASSET.
From here what ever transactions youare osted to Fixed aseet it will update in Group asset also.
chandra

KO88/CJ88 to AUC with VAT

Hello Guys,
I have the following requirement regarding Asset self production for a french company: I need to create tax input and output tax items when capitalizing the asset (Settlementfrom the AUC => Final asset)
1/ I cannot find any standard setting to do so...If you have any solution for me don't hesitate to tell me what I can do.
2/ As I did not find any solution for the previous requirement, I try to generate these tax item at the time of the first settlement (Initial account transfered to AUC): I try to do so by customizing the TAX code into the master data of the expense account customized into the settlement rule: the account that is credited when settleling the the AUC with CJ88/KO88.
When I try to do so I get an error message asking for a VAT code for this account...
Do you have any solution for this requirement? Does this mean that the VAT could only be managed into the Invoice?
Thank you in advance for your help
Best regards
Pascal MORIZUR

Hi
I have the same requirement for a french company. Did you solve the issue and please how ?
Thanks in advance

CJ88 and CJI3 for particular period showing different values

Hi,
We have automatic rule creation.
Now, we are running period settlement for period 5.
sender is WBSE
receiver is FXA
CJI3 is showing 1,171,580.82
CJ88(Test Run) is showing 1,381,580.82
Why there is difference in two, and this difference is coming only for 3 projects.
I have checked the currency, it is fine.
I tried CJEN but still the same thing.
Thanks,
Harsh.

Hi,
Nitin, There is AUC. I made typo error.
We found what was causing the difference:
It was same old down payment problem.
Closing thread.
Thanks Everyone,
Regards,
Harsh.

CJ88 and CJ8G tcodes - Settlement issue

Dear Experts,
We are having an issue in the settlement process. We ran the actual mass settlement for all the projects for the specific RA keys. I do see the cost has been posted and transferred and they are settled as expected. Accounting looks good as well. However, if I ran the settlement individually on tcode CJ88 that has been already settled in the mass settling process, it shows up on the list "to be settled" in the test mode. If I re-run it again in "Actual" mode, it settles without any issues and then it disappears from the list finally. Did anyone experience this issue before? I will post the example screenshots of the examples that I am analyzing.
thanks,
DK

Hi D K,
This doesn't seems to be a way it has to work, is there any support packs recently added, this can be a bug.
If you are able to replicate the issue always, do raise it with SAP, they will be able to provide a resolution or conclusion.
If you check with Orders, system will check for Networks or Work Orders assigned to the WBS element and the same should be settled, may be there is some cost pending from Order end. Check the order or network assignment.
Regards
Terence

Asset Capitalization using CJ88 and Processing Yaskbu

Hi Experts,
I have raised a new Asset and I am trying to transfer an old Asset to the new one, using CJ88 in Setlement rule.
Could you help on that.
Regards,
Marcos

Hi Marcos,
is it the AW 571?
The reason for error AW751 is that the exchange rate table has been changed since the settlement was run. The program expects that there will be the same currency rates in the settlement AND the settlement reversal.
The exchange rate table can be seen using transaction OB08. The program detects that the two exchange rates are different and correctly produces the error AW751. Unfortunately, the error message (Document Balance Cannot Be Distributed When Settlement Is Reversed) is only tell us in general that there is some kind of error with the total balance for the detail lines, not exactly how the error came about.
The solution is as follows:
1. FOR THE FUTURE:
Settlement is usually executed as close to the end of the settlement period as possible, to use end of period exchange rates once they are known. If currency rates will be changed before the settlement reversal, then you will have to set the value date in CJ88 (or the corresponding batch job) to some date where you HAVE ALREADY maintained    exchange rates and then the reversal will then work without any problems. It is also necessary to use the parameter 'translation date type' = '3' (translation date) in the FI-customizing for additional local currencies if they exist.
2. TO CORRECT YOUR ERROR:
To process a reversal for a settlement done earlier in the month with a different exchange rate, the only solution is to change    the exchange rate table as advised below. We recommend a temporary change, to be done when no one else is in the             system, then running the reversal and immediately changing the table back.
Regards Bernhard

Logs of cj88 and cja2

01.03.2012
Hi friends,
I am fairly new to PS.
wish to know the last date of the settlement run done on a WBS element using transaction code cj88. This is a background process.
Also if a business user has executed cja2 can i have a log for the same.
Regards,
Udaynath

In CJ88 input the relevant data in the selection criteria and from the menu go to "Previous Settlement". You should be able to get the data for previous settlement.

Error msg:AA824 while posting and AUC in f-90

hi
when iam trying to post an asset under construction through f-90 the system shows this error message AA824
No accounts have been entered for depreciation area 01 for account allocation 40000 (chart of accounts 1000).
maintain accounts for depreciation area 01.
i have checked ao90 and ao93 as well i have already maintained the accounts for that then why its showing this error.
book dep method 01 accounts also given.
Kind regards
Arman
SAP FICO

I have met the same error message, I have checked AO90 and then created accounts by using FSP0 and then assigned to depreciation area under AO90, then checked AS02 all setting seems correct, the only concern is the chart of account and company code shows different results by S_ALR_87012326 and SE16 SKA1.
Any one can help please?

Error msg:AA824 while posting and AUC in f-90 contact ure system admin

hi all
iam facing an error when iam trying to post an asset from f-90 iam getting an error msg AA824. contact your system administrator.
diagnosis:
No accounts have been entered for depreciation area 01 for account allocation 40000 (chart of accounts 1000).
procedure: maintain the accounts for dep area 01
i have seen ao90 and ao91 for dep accounts the dep accounts have been maintained in the screen for book dep 01
please let me know what to do.
Kind regards
aman

Hi,
It is clearing saying you to to enter GL accounts for your screen layout rule.
In AO90, you must maintain GL accounts for Account Acq and Prod Cost also along with Dep accounts (as you already maintained)
The above will be maintained in BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS sub dailog.
Regards,
Srinu

Settlement of proj cost to AUC and final settmnt to f.asset for closed proj

Hi PS Experts,
If the project (Investment Projects) has been closed and AUC has been fully settled to final asset but in some cases they still received invoices for the same project.
Would it be correct if they undo closed and undo teco the project and charge the cost to related WBS elements and settle to AUC then proceed to fully settled to a new fixed asset ? SInce the previous fixed asset has been depreciated, i guess we should create totally new asset to settle this new cost.
Please advise.
Thanks and regards,
Yuzeila

yes it is fine to do that from a system perspective
choose full capitalisation in transaction CJ88
also make sure that the settlement rule to the final asset is entered on the WBS
you need to check with your FI guidelines about asset value dates etc to check about the business perpspective
As an alternative - It would be OK to create a sub asset with new asset value dates and use this sub asset in the settlement rule

Without IM how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset

Dear all
without IM, how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset.
can someone explain it in details?
thanks a lot.
Judy

thanks for all of your answers.
i create the investment profile and assgin it to the project profile.
when i release the project, i see the system status changed from crtd to release and AUC.
when i do cj88, the costs are settled to the AUC No. automatically.
could you tell me how the AUC No. is created? where does it configure?
when AUC is settled to FXA, what are the procedures?
first TECO the project and then do CJ88, am I correct?
thanks a lot
Judy

AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

Hi,
We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
Please help.
Regards,
Nilesh.

Hi,
There is no error message in this case.
The scenario is like:
I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
Regards,
Nilesh

Secondary costs from WBS to an AuC

Hi,
1. I have executed Assessment[KSU5] that actually settled costs from secondary cost element[800099] to a WBS element [AAA]
2. Now I am trying to settle costs [which is secondary] from WBS element [AAA] to an AuC using CJ88 and I am getting below error
3. Just for info in allocation structure Z1, I have given settlement cost element for WBS, but still I am getting below error
Any advises/ideas, thanks
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 800099 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 800099 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z1
Regards,
Sri
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:45 AM
Edited by: Sridhar Nagavarapu on Jul 4, 2008 12:47 AM

Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
Hope this helps.
Thanks.

Exchange rate diff amount posted to AUC asset

Hello All,
I am stuck with one issue and looking for some help
We are creating purchase order with account assignment as projects and then doing MIGO & MIRO and then settling through CJ88 to AUC asset.
The issue is related to exchange rate difference amount posted to AUC asset.
MIGO and MIRO are done on different dates and the difference amount in exchange rate posted to GL account maintained in KDM.
Now, when i settle the WBS element through CJ88 the AUC asset is posted with amount including the exchange rate difference amount.
Business do not want the exchange rate amount added to the AUC asset.
please confirm is this the system standard behavior .
Your inputs appreciated.
Thanks
Shashi

Hi Shashi,
As per Accounting Standards, the asset must be valued on the exchange rate on the date which risk and reward is transferred from seller to buyer.
For example If the vendor despatch the assets on 01.03.2014 at his place and contract is Exworks then the asset must be valued on exchange rate on 01.03.2014. Lets assume exchange rate on that day is 1USD=60INR. The price is 100 USD. You receive the assets on 10.03.2014 and exchage rate on that day is 55 INR. Now if you make GR on 10.03.2014 Asset value will be 5500 INR whereas as per AS it should be 6000 INR. That is why when you do MIRO the differnce between 6000 and 5500 is posted to asset.
When you do MIRO you must enter currency(USD) in Basic data tab and exchange rate 60 in details tab.
What happens in your system is standard behavior of SAP as well as correct process as per Accounting Standards.
Hope it is clear.
Regards,
G.Sethuraman

CJ88 and AUC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for