Clarifications required on BOM

Dear Friends,
I need to create a BOM with the following structure
Consider a Cylynder as a finished product.
the cylynder is going for 3 operations Milling, turning and drilling. each operrations are made by different vendor.
the raw material is cylynder pipe and then 1 st operation is Millling. it is ging to one vendor and cmng back to factory. again it is going to turning operations to another vendor and then cmng back and finally the drilling is happening.
please suggest me how to create a BOM so that i can make a subcontract PO.
regards
Sakthi

Hi Sakti,
if you are going to use same materials(components) for each operation of subcontracting to different vendors then you can create one BOM using t-code CS, define the usage-3 put all the components at BOM item level and save the BOM Header.
One BOM is created you can Create subcontracting PO for Each vendors and you can use this BOM for item category L at Components level.
Hope you will got the idea.
Regards,
Ashish

Similar Messages

Clarification required on the Sales area data information.

Hi Master's,
As per the standard taxation practice,Tax determination depends upon the Tax liability of a Shipt to Party.
But in a Customer master The Tax classification is maintained in the SALES AREA DATA-BILLING TAB,To my understanding
the Billing Tab data comes from Sold to party.If so how does Billing tab convey the Tax liability of Ship to party.
I am Confused,please let me know in terms of Customer master and Partner types:
1) Which Tabs under the sales data i.e Shipping Billing...come from which Partner.i.e like Sold to party.
(Clarification required on the Sales area data information coming from which Partner functions).
Please suggest,
Thanks
Gajender

Hi
As per the standard taxation practice,Tax determination depends upon the Tax liability of a Shipt to Party.
But in a Customer master The Tax classification is maintained in the SALES AREA DATA-BILLING TAB,To my understanding
the Billing Tab data comes from Sold to party.If so how does Billing tab convey the Tax liability of Ship to party.
I am Confused,please let me know in terms of Customer master and Partner types:
1) Which Tabs under the sales data i.e Shipping Billing...come from which Partner.i.e like Sold to party.
(Clarification required on the Sales area data information coming from which Partner functions).
There is no need of any confusion here
All the tabs and data or fields pertains sold to party only
If for a sold to party say 1001 if he himself is going to be SH and PY and BP then there is no confusion
If for a sold to party say 1001 the ship to party is 1002 and PY is 1003 and bill to party is himself that is 1001
This is what mentioned or assigned in the partner functions of CMR of 1001 in the sales area data
This means there are another CMR lies in the name of 1002 and 1003
Whenever an order comes for 1001 as Sold to party for tax classifications the ship to paty 1002's master record is accessed by the system
System accesses another record for a particular detail (tax details)
Similarly for this customer 1001's order for payment terms 1003's CMR is accessed by the system
System accesses another record for a particular detail ( for terms of payment)
There is no need for any confusion and if you run this in the system with different data you will understand it much better
Regards
Raja

Planning of Dependent Requirements for BOM Components in Make to Order scen

Hi Friends - I want to execute a full cycle Make to Stock Scenario with Materials planning using MRP.
The scenario will include BOM Components with Routing.
The process flow I want to execute -
1. Create a Sales Order for a Finished Product (Product should have a BOM for Production)
2. Do the product Materials Planning for the Sales Order through MD50
3. Get all the dependent material requirements (both for products as Planned Order and also for BOM Components - all the BOM components should also be planned)
4. Convert Planned Order for Product to Production Order
5. Convert Planned Orders for BOM components to Purchase Requisition
6. Confirm Production Order
To execute this I have done the following
1. I have created a Material Master data for Finished Product (FERT).
2. I have assigned Item Category Group - NORM, and General Item Category group as NORM
3. I have assigned MRP Type PD in MRP 1 View and Strategy Group 20 (Make to Order Production) in MRP 3 View.
4. Now created a Universal (Type 3) BOM for the product with one material component.
5. Now also created a Routing for the Material with two operations having PP01 a control key.
6. Now created a standard sales order for the product.
7. Executed the MD50 for the Sales Order Item.
Now where do I find the BOM components for this material in the Sales Order?
After executing the planning Run MD50 I am only getting the requirements for Product only. I can't see any dependent requirements for the BOM components.
How do I make sure that the BOM components are also planned while the product is planned?
I have checked the component Stock Requirement List - there are no requirements generated from the Sales Order Product BOM.
Pls help me on this. How to do this so that the raw material components are also planned?
Thanks
Purnendu

Hi Dhaval, Sandeep, Ashok - Thanks a lot for your replies.
I have checked the Planned Order Created through Planning Run.
If I click on the Components Tab I am getting following message
No material components were determined
Message no. 61027
Diagnosis
Until now, no BOM explosion has been carried out or no BOM has been created for this material yet.
Procedure
Either explode the bill of material for this material, or
create the components manually by processing the planned order in change mode.
If I try to explode the BOM through Header Menu - Edit> Explode BOM
I am getting the same message.
If I click on the Bill of Material Tab - I am getting the same above messge.
Ashok - I have tried both the Selection Method -
Nil - Selection by Order Quant.
1 - Selection by Explosion Date
But with no effect.
Waiting for your advice.
Thanks and warm regards
Purnendu

Special pricing requirement in BOM

Dear Gurus,
Our Client is assembling Machines with sub assemblies and so on. Now when ever a customer comes he asks for a different combination, so we have designed the MMR as ERLA and has a price at header level and once assembled will be PGIed at header level. OK till here.
Now the issue is, client wants to have a facility in the system where, when ever a client comes for an order, marketing ppl should put all the different sub items in the quotation and the system should pull out the prices of those and others that are specified and marketing ppl should be able to give a Quotation. We need the pricing to be done at Sub Item level and delivery will be done at header level.
Main Item = ERLA = "THUNDER D82" = 5000.00
Sub Item 01 = TAE = Motor 10 HP = 2000.00
Sub Item 02 = TAE = Gear Box 4 Teeth = 1750.00
Sub Item 01 = TAE = Compressor 5 TON = 1250.00
Now when a new customer comes in, we need a facility where in VA21, THUNDER D82 is entered and at sub item level the requirement is:
Sub Item 01 = TAE = Motor 12 HP = 2750.00
Sub Item 02 = TAE = Gear Box 5 Teeth = 2100.00
Sub Item 01 = TAE = Compressor 7.5 TON = 1750.00
Main Item = THUNDER D82 = 6600.00
We cannot maintain a new MMR since every customer can demand a new combination. Kindly remember, once assembled this machine is to be priced at header level and delivered / PGIed at header level. And since the machine will have a lot of other parts, we cannot use LUMF at MMR level.
So how to achieve this? Help me out here Gurus. . . . . .
Best Regards
Venkat - Hyd

Hello Venkat
You need to use a combination of Variant Config (VC) and BOM to make this work.
1) Set up Main Item (THUNDER D82) as configurable material . Set up characteristics (CT04) for the options (example Gear Box would be one characteristic with its values as 4 teeth, 5 teeth etc. These are the values user would choose in the sales order in the configuration tab. Set up a class of variant class Type (300, include all these chars in that and finally link this to the material via config profile.
2) Set up a master BOM with all the components possible and use selection conditions to choose them based on configuration in the order.
3) Introduce Variant Pricing conditions (VA00) to add price for the component selected in the main item's pricing. This also involves using Variant table and/or Dependencies.
This is too brief and very broad based. It involves many steps but will work if you go at it methodically.
Let me know if you get any specific doubts as you go through the steps. Take care.

How to create requirement for BOM, not for its components?

Dear gurus,
I have never worked in PS module before. Now I have the following task:
There is Project, Network and WBS. I inserted material for operation in WBS and exploded the material.
Now the system must create requirement for this material but NOT for components of BOM. How can I configure the system?
P.S. We don't use MRP and we can't change Material Master Data.
Edited by: Azat Fayzullin on Dec 8, 2009 12:44 PM

Have you read SAP help on PS
also check this forum for similar posts
If you have never worked on PS module I am not sure if you will be able to configure the system
please attend some courses in PS from your local SAP academy course names are PLM200, PLM210, PLM220, PLM230, PLM240
for your specific requirements I would recommend PLM200 and PLM220

New requirement in BOM - supply area

Dear friends
My client requirement as below
He want a new field in BOM item details, where in he will input the physical location where this item is assembled in shop floor. ex ( s1,s2.....s99)
After entering this in all applicable BOM, he wants to make a report shop floor area wise the list of items applicable to that particular area
Ex:- The report input should be with in the plant the shop no ( s1,s2..s99 ). The report output should be
Shop floor     Item No                Description
s1                 xxxxxx                 xxxxxxxx
                     xxxxxxx                xxxxxxx
                     xxxxxxxx              xxxxxxxx
s2                    xxxxxxxxxxx        xxxxxxxxx
                        xxxxxxxxxxx       xxxxxxxxx
                         xxxxxxxxxx        xxxxxxxxxx
Purpose is they want to display the applicable item details in the respective shop area.
Regards
J.Saravanan

Hi Jagannathan Saravanan,
   Why you are trying for new field such field is Available at item header in Status/Lng Text you try for this but till you required new field then you go for field exit and create this with ABAP guys.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rajesh

ECM - History Requirement for BOM status not activated

Hello,
He have an issue with the warning message displayed when we are trying to modificate an BOM (transaction CS02).
In OS25 transaction we defined that only BOMs with "usage = 1" and "status = 3" have history requirement.
The parameters of OS27 transaction are OK too.
The problem is that the warning message 045 is displayed when we execute CS02 for every kind of BOM usage and status.
We must substitute the warning message by an error message. To do that, we must disable the field NOHIS in C_STUE_NOH object, in the user profile. But, when we do that, the error message is displayed to all kind of BOMs status, blocking the process (following the warning message, which is displayed to all kind of BOM status)
This is an issue of SAP_APPL 470 system.
We tested the similar procedure in an SAP_APPL 603 system, and the results were OK, in other words, the warning message is only displayed for the BOM usage and BOM status defined in OS25 transaction.
Thank's in advance

When the BOM with usage 1 and status 3, by example, is changed with a modification number (following OS25 parameters), the field STZU-HISTK is activated.
Then, if the status of the BOM is changed to 2, the modification number is required, because the STZU-HISTK is activated.
In OS25 transaction only the BOm usage = 1 and BOM status = 3 has the history requirement flag, but after the modification with the mod. number, all the status of the BOM now has the modification number requirement.
How can I allow the modification of the BOM without modification number (other status not flagged in OS25), if this BOM hal already been changed with an modification number (by the status flagged in OS25)?
Thank's in advance

Excise point of view Clarification required

HI
Once we delivered the goods to the Customer , some of the material are damaged in transporation
I received the Customer compliant but we didn't take the return back those materials , just we are sending material with free of cost
what sales document type i need to use ( SD or NL)
is it required to Pay the Excise Duites & VATor CST because net value is ZERO but the goods are moving from plant(esciseable plant) to customer location
and also Same as Sample we are sending to the customer
please clarify my doubts in Excise point of vioew

clarify my doubts in Excise point of vioew
Whatever be the scenario, if any excisable material goes out of a manufacturing plant, the manufacturer is suppose to pay duty to the extent of quantity being sent. This is excise law. The same case for tax also.
In fact, in excise, if you show the proof of taking back the goods to parent plant as rejections, then you can take the credit of duty paid.
In SAP, you can consider any document type and depending upon the requirement, you can customize it.
G. Lakshmipathi

Clarification required in File to DB scenario

Hi all,
I have a requirement to insert flat file records to a Oracle database.
Few fields in the database are of type nchar/nvarchar.Is there any special transformation required in PI for these fields, as my records are not getting inserted into DB when i pass a char value for these.If i pass numbers for the same,the records are getting inserted.As of now the datatype of these fields in PI is string.
Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
Sowmya

Hi,
I think data type should be same in DB & PI, meanwhile valiables sequence in PI should be same as DB sequence names.
Find below link for more help on configuration
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30

Clarification required in Script Logic

Hi All,
I had written a Script logic which copies the data from one dimension member of entity to another entity.
The script that we used is pasted here for reference:
"//Logic for Revenue Transfer for one account to account
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CATEGORY = BUDGET
*XDIM_MEMBERSET P_ACCT = REV000003, REV000007, REV000008
*XDIM_MEMBERSET P_ACTIVITY = P_ACTIVITY_NONE
*XDIM_MEMBERSET P_DATASRC = U
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ENTITY = U_RCL_INP, U_MFG_INP, U_FSI_INP, U_ECS_INP, U_KS_INP, U_INDIA_INP, U_BIZP_INP, U_SI_INP
*XDIM_MEMBERSET INTCO = I_U_RCL, I_U_MFG, I_U_FSI, I_U_ECS, I_U_KS, I_U_INDIA, I_U_BIZP, I_U_SI
//Revenue Transfer from P_ACCT REV000003 to P_ACCT REV000004
*WHEN P_ACCT
*IS "REV000003"
*REC(FACTOR=1,P_ACCT=REV000004 ,INTCO=ENTITY.INTCO,ENTITY=INTCO.ENTITY)
//Revenue Transfer from P_ACCT REV000007 to P_ACCT REV000012
*IS "REV000007"
*REC(FACTOR=1,P_ACCT=REV000012 ,INTCO=ENTITY.INTCO,ENTITY=INTCO.ENTITY)
//Revenue Transfer from P_ACCT REV000008 to P_ACCT REV000009
*IS "REV000008"
*REC(FACTOR=1,P_ACCT=REV000009 ,INTCO=ENTITY.INTCO,ENTITY=INTCO.ENTITY)
*ENDWHEN"
The above script logic is not working if the user doesnt have access to the other entity to which data is copied into.
However, as per our business requirement, we need to restrict the access to the users to thier respective entites.
Hence, i would be glad to know, How can I overcome this limitation, or, how can I bypass the authorization through script logic??
Let me know incase you require any further information about the issue.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Chandra

Hi Nilanjan,
As Anurodh said, The command *IGNORE_SECURITY is not recognised in the BPC NW. I tried, but is not validated.
Anurodh,
Thanks for the link. Seems it is helpful.
Regards,
Chandra

Clarification required regarding Destinations

Hi Experts,
I have a doubt regarding the security of destinations for WSIL, WSDL and RFC.
Whenever we create the destinations for WSIL, WSDL and RFC, in the security part we select the "User ID / Password" mechanism and enter the user ID and password (Administrator in case of SAP WebAS and for ECC <superadmin> ID)
Can we use a different ID for both these systems while creating the Logical Destinations?
If Yes, please let me know the minimum Authorizations required for the User ID and the steps.
Regards,
Poojith MV

Wrong forum!
>Can we use a different ID for both these systems while creating the Logical Destinations?
Yes.
BR, Siarhei

Clarification required on EP level Authorization in comparision with R/3

Hi All,
I want to be clear with the concept of authorizations in EP compare with R/3.
The following the sample concept which we need it, is it possible in EP! Any suggestions or ideas will be apprecialted.
Requirement:
If one R/3 user ID is required for all EP Users How are we going to control the authorizations at EP Level? (For example one EP User is required only MIGO another EP user is required MIGO& ME21N)
If I want to restrict some functions of MIGO to some EP Users how is it possible?( like only goods receipt for one EP User goods issue for another EP User). Is it at EP level or R/3 Level?
How do I hide the unwanted fields at the EP User level Transactions? (In MIGO if I want to hide all the not required fields is it possible)
How is it commercially benefit to client? ( If I have the 10 C&F Locations how is it commercially viable to go for EP)
Thanks & Regards,
Sireesha.B

Hi Sireesha
Requirement:
If one R/3 user ID is required for all EP Users How are we going to control the authorizations at EP Level? (For example one EP User is required only MIGO another EP user is required MIGO& ME21N)
-> Not possible becoz u map two portal user to one R3 User, since Authorization check is perform at R3 level so both portal user have same authorization for transaction code which R3 user have. U only restrict to view the iview for tranasaction. means u may create two different role for two portal user one role contain MIGO iview and other contain MIGO& ME21N
If I want to restrict some functions of MIGO to some EP Users how is it possible?( like only goods receipt for one EP User goods issue for another EP User). Is it at EP level or R/3 Level?
-> same as above authorization check is perform according to R3 User rights which u mapped to portal user.
How do I hide the unwanted fields at the EP User level Transactions? (In MIGO if I want to hide all the not required fields is it possible)
-> If u use tranasaction iview than it's not possible.
How is it commercially benefit to client? ( If I have the 10 C&F Locations how is it commercially viable to go for EP)
-> I can't understand ur question can u clerify it.
conclusion: -> u need to map one portal user to only one R3 user so authorization is done according to R3 user rights.
regards,
kaushal

HCM Process and Forms - Clarification required reg BADI QISR1.

Hi all,
I want to have some extra validations done on some of the fields of my HCM Process Adobe form. For this, I created a new implementation for the BADI QISR1 with filter value as my Custom Scenario and implemented the method INT_SERVICE_REQUEST_CHECK. Validation is working now, but, it's not updating any data to the back end after I submit. When I checked, I found that SAP has written the whole logic to update the data to the Infotypes in another Implementation of the same BADI,which was like the Default implementation. But, that implementation is not getting triggerred now, as I have a new one now.
Do I have to copy the whole update logic to this Implementation now? Or is there any other setting for this?
Kindly help me.
Regards!
Mahesh

Not sure I follow you here, but here's some basics.
For any backend updates to infotypes, you should use the standard services SAP_PA, SAP_PT and SAP_PD (if on EhP4).
In some case, this won't work. So you have two choices:
(1) write and advanced generic service to handle this (difficult and no examples from SAP)
(2) write custom code triggered in workflow to do this (such as a custom function module) to handle your updates (past EhP2, you have to use the same classes as the decoupled framework uses....not the good ol' "infotype operations" standard FM).
Now, as for validations, you can handle those separately. In fact, talk about timely! (haha) I just posted a blog on this just now. =)
/people/christopher.solomon/blog/2009/06/22/hcm-processes-forms-required-fields-arent-what-they-use-to-be

Function module required for BOM Changes

Dear SAP Guru
I need the function module which gives me the details of changes done in the BOM.
Scenario: Need to develop the report which gives only the details of BOM changed on the given date. The BOM level might vary.
Regards
Rahul

Dear
I think you should have ECM in place to have tracability for any changes carried out in BOM .
Refer earlier posting : Re: ECM ECR
If the ECM is in place , then you can see what changes has been done in CC02/03 Environmnet - > Reporting -> Bill of Material.
Otherwise please try the following Functinal Module : You can also try CEWB and CS80
1. CSAP_BOM_ITEM_MAINTAIN
2.CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2
3.CHANGEDOCUMENT_READ and CDHDR
Refer : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/92/58b521417011d189ec0000e81ddfac/content.htm
Regards
JH

Data source | Clarification Required

hi,
I have created a report in CR designer using oracle as datasource.
Now i need to add other datasource like text files or excel or xml.
I can able to create report using it in CR designer.
When i launch it in CR viewer it was throwing unexpected DB connector error.I am using CR4E
Is there any way to use additional datasources?

Crystal Report for Eclipse, is a pure java product which requires you to use a java database driver. I don't know if we have a list of which drivers are java based, but many aren't.

Clarifications required on BOM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for