Clarity slider and tone curve in LR4

Why does the clarity slider seem different to me in LR4 (4.1 RC actually)? IN LR3 I loved that thing. I would ramp it up quite a bit with many photos. It would give it a nice crisp look. Now it seems as if it just makes my shots look like they have too much contrast. Also, when using the clarity brush, many times it seems as if where I paint it on it actually lightens it up. I havce had to look as see if I had the exposure tool on instead.
Also, I swear a "medium contrast" tone curve setting is different now as well. This was the default setting in LR3. Now default is linear. But if I apply a medium curve from the drop down, it looks over cooked? What the heck? Are these things just me? BTW I am working RAW files. Thanks

If you want a PV2010 linear tone curve for PV2012, using the DNG Profile Editor (DPE):
* convert any raw file to DNG (if not already DNG)
* load it into the DPE
* Edit things if you want, except for the tone curve.
* Save the recipe.
* Load it (dcpr file) into a text editor.
* Replace the tone curve with this:
<dngclr:ToneCurve rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:Edit0 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>0</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>0</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit0>
<dngclr:Edit1 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>17</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>26</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit1>
<dngclr:Edit2 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>34</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>44</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit2>
<dngclr:Edit3 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>51</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>60</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit3>
<dngclr:Edit4 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>68</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>74</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit4>
<dngclr:Edit5 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>85</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>89</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit5>
<dngclr:Edit6 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>102</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>105</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit6>
<dngclr:Edit7 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>119</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>120</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit7>
<dngclr:Edit8 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>136</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>135</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit8>
<dngclr:Edit9 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>153</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>151</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit9>
<dngclr:Edit10 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>170</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>167</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit10>
<dngclr:Edit11 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>187</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>183</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit11>
<dngclr:Edit12 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>204</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>200</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit12>
<dngclr:Edit13 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>221</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>218</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit13>
<dngclr:Edit14 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>238</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>236</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit14>
<dngclr:Edit15 rdf:parseType="Resource">
<dngclr:X>255</dngclr:X>
<dngclr:Y>255</dngclr:Y>
</dngclr:Edit15>
</dngclr:ToneCurve>
* Re-save the file in your text editor
* Re-load the changed recipe in DPE
* Export a profile with a tone curve equivalent to PV2010 linear.
Note: The tone/point curve in Lightroom will not have any points on it that way.
PS - This procedure assumes you will be using the "Base Profile" for "Base Tone Curve" in order to achieve equivalence with PV2010 linear in PV2012 (for the same Cam-cal profile(s)). If what you want is a truly linear tone curve, select "Linear" as "Base Tone Curve".
Rob

Similar Messages

  • Fix 'Recovery' slider & add 'Color Correction' slider to Tone Curve

    My requests:
    1.) Please change the behavior of the 'Recovery' slider so that it attacks very-blown-out-highlights more rigorously than less-blown-out-highlights.
    2.) Please add a 'Color Correction' slider to the Tone Curve that is analogous to the 'Color Correction' slider built into the 'Shadows/Highlights' tool in Adobe Photoshop & Apple Aperture.
    To more clearly understand what I'm asking for, let me compare Aperture vs. LR's handling of Highlight Recovery, and why I prefer how Aperture recovers my highlights with its Shadows/Highlights tool vs. how LR recovers my highlights with the 'Recovery' slider OR Tone Curve.
    1.) Aperture's 'Shadows/Highlights' tool recovers highlights by attacking the brightest parts of the highlights more harshly than the lesser bright parts of the highlights (th extent of luminosities attacked is adjustable using the 'High Tonal Width' slider). LR's "Recovery' tool doesn't seem to, among highlights, preferentially attack the brighter parts of the highlights over the less bright highlights. In fact, sometimes it leaves THE brightest parts of my image nearly untouched! I've posted an image below that shows this.
    2.) Aperture's 'Highlights' tool recovers highlights WHILE maintaining color saturation (you can control the extent to which this saturation is maintained using the 'Color Correction' slider under Advanced settings fo the Shadows/Highlights tool). LR's 'Highlights' within the Tone Curve desaturates colors as highlights are 'recovered' by bringing 'Highlights' down. Again, I've posted an image below that shows this.
    Here is an image that clearly shows the different behaviors of Aperture's Shadows/Highlights tool vs. LR's Recovery tool vs. LR's 'Highlights' slider within the Tone Curve:
    http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/Lightroom/HighlightRecovery_LRvsAperture.jpg
    I believe that LR's 'Recovery' slider has much room for improvement (i.e. attack the blown-out highlights more harshly than the less-blown-out highlights), and the addition, to LR's Tone Curve, of a similar 'Color Correction' slider as Aperture's & PS CS3's very own 'Shadows/Highlights' tools have, would be very welcome.
    Thank you for your consideration,
    Rishi

    More for your eyes to feast on:
    http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/Lightroom/HighlightRecovery_LRvsAperture_2.jpg
    http://web.mac.com/rishisanyal/Lightroom/LR_FailsToDecreaseBlownOutHighlights.jpg
    Funny thing is, LR just seems unwilling to touch (255,255,255) blown-out highlights. In all my test images with a blown-out sun, LR leaves the sun at (255,255,255) after all combinations of exposure, recovery, and Tone Curve manipulations. Whereas Aperture will bring it down to something like (128,128,128). Which seems more logical, to me, if one is trying to darken the image or darken highlights... right?
    Also, if you look at the Seattle & Mt. Rainier image, no matter what I try, LR will not get rid of that brighter 'halo' to the upper left of Mt. Rainier. It just won't! 'Recovery' ends up highlighting just that bubble, and decreasing the Highlights in the Tone Curve just turns it into a grey, desaturated, halo. I'm telling, it just won't get rid of that halo! It has a love affair with it! :)
    Aperture immediately gets rid of it with its Highlight slider, and Photoshop's 'Shadows/Highlights' tool also gets rid of it after a bit of manipulations/tweaking.
    Now, I try to avoid Aperture at all costs, but, for all these images, seems like I need to use Aperture as my 'external editor' just to fix the highlights!
    Any suggestions are very much welcome & appreciated.

  • Missing Basic and Tone Curve Panel in LR5

    Last night I installed LR5 (last version was LR3) on my iMac with Mavericks OS and everything was working fine, I thought, and I was using the Develop Module when I noticed the Basic Panel and Tone Curve Panel (which I had been using) had gone missing .  As in, poof, they were gone.  So now I have the Histogram, the Crop and other tools and brushes, and then nothing until HSL/Color/B&W and then on down.

    I'm cheating here with another question, but I think it will be quick:  I see LR5 automatically uses the updated interface for Highlights, Shadows, Blacks, Whites and I see they are more precise and subtle.  Can I go to photos adjusted in LR3 that still show the LR3 interface and use the LR5 interface & finer adjustments on the old photos?

  • New User need help... can't make any adjustments othe then presets and Tone Curve

    Please Advise
    Thanks

    Not sure what you mean, but maybe you can try right-clicking on the Tone Curve (or other panel) heading and then check the other panels you want visible.  In other words, in the Develop module, right-click next to the words "Tone Curve."  Is that what you are after?
    Edit:  Or.... try the Window Menu and then click Panels and make sure the right panel is showing.
    John

  • LR4: tone curve settings lost after upgrade

    I've find an annoying bug in this new version that makes me really crazy.
    I've a Nikon D300S and a D7000.
    After the importation of the catalog in the new Lightroom 4 all the D7000 .dng files have lost all the tone curve settings (I normally use linear).
    The D300S files instead retain the tone curve settings.
    It's a very strange behaviour: I've lost more than half of my old photo settings.
    It's really frustrating.
    Will be resolve soon this problem?
    Until that day, for my older works I'll be obliged to continue to use LR3.

    I've probably found a sort of workaround!
    I've made some "organized" tests and here I report my findings.
    Using LR3.5, I prepared a "test catalog" using 4 images from 7 different cameras (28 images total): for each of them, I used both the original nef and the dng converted file (56 files in the catalog), all develop process was set to "2010".
    The cameras were Nikon D70, D90, D200, D300s, D700, D5000, D7000.
    I applied a strong tone curve to each image in a way that the appearance was heavily characterized.
    Before exit LR3.5, I SAVED ALL THE METADATA TO THE FILES.
    Opening and converting the catalog using LR4, doesn't show any visual change until I zoom in library or open the develop module: both these operation lead to a flat image with the strong tone curve lost.
    Curiously, the history retains the original steps but they are ineffective: histogram and tone curve changes according to the visual change but for some camera the "new" tone curve is "medium contrast", for others (D5000, D90) is "linear", for D300s is "custom" (linear with blacks cut at 9.8%, and this explain my initial impression that D300s's curves were untouched, sorry). This last behavior may depend on the fact that I've different default develop settings depending on the camera serial number.
    Finally, the update to the 2012 process only minimally changes the visual appearance and surely doesn't restore the lost tone curves.
    And here is the UNEXPECTED WORKAROUND: doing a READ METADATA FROM FILES IT RESTORES THE TONE CURVES (and the 2010 process)! Upgrading the process to 2012 minimally changes the visual appearance again but now the strong tone curve is present and evident.

  • Tiny little tone curve idea

    In the tone curve one has the three sliders on the bottom splitting the curve into shadows, darks, lights and highlights. The initial settings for the "tone curve regions" are 0-25, 25-50, 50-75 and 75-100.
    What I would like to see, is an option to change this initial setting to be relative to the image tonality, not absolute 25/50/75 slider positions, but relative to the amount of different tones in the image. For example in a dark low key image the shadow region could initially be set to something like 0-15 - whatever amounts to 25% of the pixels in the image, and if there were only very little highlights, the righthandmost slider would be probably close to the middle initially, covering the lightest 25% of the pixels in the image.
    Sure, I can do this now manually, but an automated option would be nice as I often want to start tweaking the curve with the "splitters" dividing the curve into regions each with roughly the same amount of pixels.

    Extremely extremely MONEY for the flat film scans I bring over from VueScan.
    All the image data is bunched up on the left side, and Tone Curve is useless until I start varying the split point sliders.
    An automated feature for this would be extremely useful.
    -Rishi

  • LR4.1 - Tone Curve - how to adjust individual RGB channels?

    Hi,
    I am having trouble figuring out how to adjust the curve of individual RGB channels.  I am assuming the LR4 Tone Curve works like the PS Curves dialog with the channel dropdown.
    The LR4.1 Help says:
    To make adjustments to individual points on the tone curve, choose an option from the Point Curve menu, click the Edit Point Curve button , and do any of the following:
    Choose an option from the Channel pop-up menu. You can edit all three channels at once, or choose to edit the Red, Green, or Blue channel individually.
    When I click the little icon in the lower right corner of the Tone Curve panel, the panel shrinks so that I don't see the Regions sliders.  If I click again, they are visible again.  I can't find where to select one of the three indvidual channels.
    The Help refers to "the Point Curve menu."  Where is the Point Curve menu?  Is the Point Curve different from the Tone Curve?
    If I right-click (Windows) in the curve dialog, the context menu has a Show Info option.  I click it on/off and don't see any change or any info.  Where should I be looking for info?
    Thanks for any help here.
    John

    Good morning John,
    The point curve is the one without the sliders. The adjustments for the individual channels are only available with
    PV2012. You must be editing a file with PV2010 or 2003. When in PV2012 you will see " Channels:   RGB" below the curve window. Click on the doule triangles following the RGB
    to pick the individual channel.
    HTH
    Rich

  • LR5 not showing Tone Curve "region" panel and associated sliders.

    Hi,
    The Tone Curve panel in LR5 as currently set up isn't showing the "Region" sub-panel and associated sliders.  It also isn't showing the slider immediately under the tone curve itself.  Any ideas on how to get these features to show?
    Thanks

    Hi Jao,
    Bingo!  That did the trick.  Many thanks.
    Ian

  • LR4 Tone curve reset

    Hi,
    Installed LR4 today and ran into a problem.
    I have been working with alot of negatives lately and therefore my photos have a reversed tone curve. When I converted my existing catalog all looked fine, using the old previews. But when I go into develop on any of the photos the tone cureve gets reset to normal behaivour, and I have to redo the "invert". And all this using the old process (2010). This is really problematic. Can someone else confirm this issue?

    Quite the same problem for me here: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/971408

  • LR4 Tone Curve default

    Why in LR4 is the Tone Curve default set to Custom with a contrast lowering curve? I would like the default to be linear, but I can't remember how I set that up in LR3.

    You probably had a preset for your camera in default develop settings, set to LR3- linear tone curve?
    And now you have changed it into LR4- linear and have saved this as new develop default?
    On this forum we prefer to share findings, so that others can benefit from by reading about it... It is not enough if just your particular issue is solved.
    Cornelia

  • Tone curve not present on upgrade from LR4 to Lr5

    In upgrading from LR4 to LR5 the tone curve in development catalog is gone

    See also http://laurashoe.com/2013/10/01/when-panels-modules-tools-and-more-go-missing-in-lightroom /

  • Contrast slider vs. tone/point curve

    What is the difference between adding contrast with the contrast slider and using the tone curve? I've noticed that I prefer a default contrast slider setting of about 10 (I shoot mostly portraits), and then using the tone curve to create more subtle tonal changes. But I'm curious to know exactly what's happening under the hood.
    Thanks.

    I'm reviving this thread and hope that someone knowledgable might shed some light.
    The way I'm thinking, the tone sliders affects the image in the same way as control points on a curve will. And anyone who has played with many points and extreme settings on a tone curve have seen how easily you can get lost and a reset is the only way to recover.
    So I'm a bit cautious when riding the sliders, afraid that f.ex a combination of a lot of fill light and much blacks wil take the curve somewhere it's impossible to recover from. I guess maybe I would like to see a curve and how it is affected by my sliders. To keep me from getting into trouble, i.e pointy, squiggly curve.
    I hope this makes sense to someone.

  • I am working in the Develop module of Lightroom 5 and have accidentally bumped a setting and lost the Basic menu and the option to retrieve it.  "Tone curve" is directly under the tool bar now.  How can I retrieve the "Basic" menu?

    How can I retrieve the "Basic" menu on Lightroom 5?  I accidentally bumped something while working in the Develop module of Lightroom 5, and now the Tone Curve menu is directly under the Tool Bar, with no option to click on "Basic." 

    Right-click on Tone Curve and choose basic again or press Ctrl+1 in Develop.
    On Mac (Control-Click or Cmd+1)

  • I have lost my "Basic" panel in the Develop module and can't figure out how to get it back. My right panel goes from the Histogram straight to the Tone Curve panel.  My Basic panel should be below the Histogram.  Any ideas how to get it back.  I have even

    I have lost my "Basic" panel in the Develop module and can't figure out how to get it back. My right panel goes from the Histogram straight to the Tone Curve panel.  My Basic panel should be below the Histogram.  Any ideas how to get it back.  I have even uninstalled my lightroom and reinstalled it with same issue.  Help!!!

    Right click on or near one of the other headers and a pop-up will appear and you will be able to select the Basic Panel for viewing.

  • I was processing pictures and the Basic function on the right has disapeared ( the one that has Exposure etc) I know see the Histogram, then Tone Curve, HSL/Color/B

    I was processing pictures and the Basic function on the right has disappeared, the one that contains Exposure, Contrast etc. I now have only the Histogram, Paint Brush etc, then it goes to Tone Curve, HSL/Color/B&W and all others down to Camera Calibration. How can I recuperate Basic ?? Thanks for your help

    i have now found where the OS permission is located but cannot find a way to change it. Here is what I have done:
    - Selected the Local Disk Folder
    - Chose  File>Get Info
    - Click on Sharing and Permissions (It shows Read Only)
    Now this is where I am stuck, the instruction in Apple Support says "Select a user or Group from the Name Column then choose the following Pop-Up menu in the Priviliges column(this is where the Read &Write option should be. I can't choose a user or group under the name column, all I have in the Name column is "Local Disk"
    Can someone help me from here to convert to Read & Write, thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Second user accont loses sound.

    I set up a second account for my husband and it loses sound frequently.  I login to my account-the sound works, then login to his account -it doesn't.  Not the mute/volume.  We restart, it's fixed, hour later- off again. I haven't tested it to see if

  • Is this unusual or not start up for osx?

    I have a g4 running osx 10.4.3 tiger updated from panther without issue for several months. A few weeks back, just after booting up I got a small black screen overlay (viewing over the gray background with the apple logo) that said "You must re-boot

  • Credit Holds released by the 'Rescheduling' program - SDV03V02

    I have an issue in which the credit holds on a company/order was released and unconfirmed orders confirmed after the Rescheduling program (SDV03V02) ran in the background. This program runs as a scheduled job everyday and this has never happened befo

  • E-mail printing

    E-mails will not print out correctly. Sometimes it prints only top of e-mail, sometimes e-mails are printed right justified and only part of the first page of msg with only half the lines shown ; however on all out put printing I always get the msg f

  • Differences between wireless cards

    Speccing out an All-In-One Pavilion to purchase.  There are 3 listed wirelss options:---------------------------NetworkingNetwork port for broadband and Internet connectivity included. Internet access is sold separately. HP Wireless 802.11 b/g/n 1x1