Classification of Shares ( Equity)
Hello Expert,
I have some query related to our treasury module - eqity (product type 1A)
Generally company classifies it shares in two classes.
1. Class A share
2. Class B share. (Differance : one of the shaer is having more voting rights).
Now the problem is how we map this classification of share in SAP ( one solution : I can add these class in General Security Classification in t.code FWZZ). Is there any otherway where we defined these classes ?
Suppose i have maintained class as above ( in FWZZ general classification) and I have created two security ids one for class A and other for Class B. Now the scenario is my class A has 25 share transfered in Class B and i got the 100 class B share with refrence to class A 25 share. Now how system wil take care of this situation. I am not able to figure out.
It should reduce 25 share from security id 1 and add 100 share in security id 2.
Please help or atleast suggest is this possible or not ?
Thanks
Regards
Priya
Hi Ravi,
Thanks For you suggestion but i am not able to use subscription rights for my purpose or not able to understand the flows.
I have 100 classs A share. Now i want to reduce 25 share from class A and it will update 100 share for Class B ( new security id) Automatically.
I have created a new security id with product type 3A (Subscription rights).
now what is next step. should i exercise it or how what way ilinked it.
Can u please tell me the flow because. I am little bit confused.
I have created a security id for Class A Share (Product category 10)
I also created a security id for Class B share (Product category 10)
Now I am creating a id for subscription rights (product category 30)
how i linked all these id.
I have the differance in A share and B share (FYI only). Google has opt this option (practically).
GOOGLE has opted this scheme
There is two classes of Google stock u2014 one (Class B shares) with u201Csuper-votingu201D rights of 10 times those of the other (Class A) shares. This two-part equity capital structure ensures that power remains firmly in the foundersu2019 hands. In addition, Class B shares will be convertible, whereas Class A shares will not.
Please help
or do we have another solution for it ?
Regards
Priya
Similar Messages
-
Linking between departments within a division
Hello,
In what table do I see the link between departments and divisions in the SAP RPM tables?
When configuring our system, in the customer classification section, we manually defined the divisions and the departments within each division.
For example:
Division- Energy
Departments- Manufacturing, System management, Fuel Management
I tried using /RPM/RELATION_D table but with no success. I did not find a correlation between the two.
I need to find a table that when filtering on one specific division, it will dispaly all the departments within.
With Kind Regards,
AyeletHi Ayelet,
A Classification Portfolio with related Classification Hierarchy can be found as follows:
1. /RPM/PORTFOLIO_D (--> Hierarchy = X) for the classification portfolio
2. /RPM/BUCKET_D for all the classification levels
You can therefore see that classification hierarchies share the portfolio and bucket tables
Please take a look and let me know.
Does this answer your question?
Regards
C -
Hi All,
Can i get a information on a good marketing tool from SAP, it should have the following functionalities:
1. Brand Management: Comparative study for competitor Brands with our own Brand, market share / Equity, Brand Awarness Programmes, Brand Communication and Ad agency management etc.,
2. Product Pricing: Competitor Pricig analysis and own prod pricing based on the market, external factors, trends and internal cost analysis. Various discount structures of competitor product, maintainance feilds and analysis for developing and taking discount related management decisssions for promotion..
The above said core marketing related functionalities should have in that tool, Can any one give informatin please...
Regards,
Skumar
Functinal Consultant
SEAL - IndiaNo one could answer this hence i would like to close without the getting any details
-
Hi All,
Can i get a information on a good marketing tool from SAP, it should have the following functionalities:
1. Brand Management: Comparative study for competitor Brands with our own Brand, market share / Equity, Brand Awarness Programmes, Brand Communication and Ad agency management etc.,
2. Product Pricing: Competitor Pricig analysis and own prod pricing based on the market, external factors, trends and internal cost analysis. Various discount structures of competitor product, maintainance feilds and analysis for developing and taking discount related management decisssions for promotion..
The above said core marketing related functionalities should have in that tool, Can any one give informatin please...
Regards,
Skumar
Functinal Consultant
SEAL - IndiaNo one could answer this hence i would like to close without the getting any details
-
How to get the Equity Share (%) based on a BSEG record
Dear JVA experts,
I have to model a relation with BSEG and JVA tables to get the Equity Share from T8JQ.
it has been proposed to me to build a relation as follows:
BSEG-BELNR - BKPF-BELNR
BKPF-AWKEY -> JVSO1-REFDOCNR
BKPF-GJAHR -> JVSO1-REFYEAR
BKPF-BUKRS -> JVSO1-RBUKRS
get JVSO1-VNAME
finally get T8JQ-VNAME and get T8JQ-EQSHARE.
My question to you.
I have found that in BSEG there are some JVA fields. Would it be possible to model another relation in order to get the Equity Share from T8JQ from a BSEG record, avoiding the reading of JVSO1 ?
thanks in advance for your help ?
best regards,
LoryHi Lory,
You can refer BSEG table to mapp with T8JQ to retrieve Equity share. You have not mentioned what are the line item you would consider to retrieve Equity share details. If you are not considering clearing documents which normally refer the line item which has to be cleared for JV details, will have not JV information to get corresponding Equity share details from T8JQ
Example:
I have two line items
Doc No
1 . DR 400 JV1
2 Doc No. CR 400 -- Clearing document -
How to make tax classification field mandatory in sales order ?
Hi,
while creating sales order, " how to make tax classification field mandatory ".
Please tell me the procedure.
In tcode OVA2. what are the entries for fields,table.
Regards,
sapsduserDear ,
Could you please share why you want to make tax Classification field mandatory in sales order.
Maintain Tax classification field for customer in Customer Master Data = (Sales Area Data - Billing document Tab page)
Tax Classification field for Material in Material Master Data = Sales Org. 1 View.
While creating sales order and enter customer and material system automatically fetch the tax classification related data into sales order.
Tax is calculated based on the ship to party.
Hope this will help you.....
Regards,
Manoranjan. -
Posting Vendor Classification Data using XK02 transaction
Hi All,
I am getting the vendor master legacy data by using an IDoc where in i am uploading the vendor information through transaction XK02. Now i have to enhance that to post the vendor classification information also. There is a function module IDOC_INPUT_CREDITOR, which is modified to a ZIDOC_INPUT_CREDITOR and the changes are made as per the client requirements. Could you please let me know how can i post the vendor classification information along with the vendor information. Let me know under which segment i need to write the code for this. Please share your experiences in loading the vendor master data load along with vendor classification.
Let me know if you need any more information.
Thank You,
SureshHere are the fields you need to fill.
BIKSSK-MAFID = 'O'.
BIKSSK-KLART = 'Z10'.
BIKSSK-OBJEK = 'YOUR-VENDOR-NUMBER-IN-INTERNAL-FORMAT'.
You may also need other values concatenated to vendor number if the classification is at company code level or purchasing org level.
BIKSSK-CLASS = 'YOUR-CLASS'.
I am not giving BIAUSP because I think you can figure it out.
Srinivas
Message was edited by: Srinivas Adavi -
Exchange transport rule so a message classification
I can create the RMS template in the RMS management utility on the RMS server, put the templates in a shared location and enable RMS by specifying a template location in a Group Policy.
The result is that
users will see the message classifications in Outlook
… but when I try to create a transport rule based on the template, the templates are not available in ECP in the dropdown for message classification (the ones you see in the example below are there b/c I added them via Exchange
powershell.
The other way to add message classifications is to create them in PowerShell on the mail server. When created this way the Message classifications show up when creating a new rule (as seen above) but
the end users don’t see them in Outlook.
One source says to make a registry change on the user’s computers:
Next, copy the XML file to a location on the client or networked location which is readable by Users. On the client, make the
following registry changes:
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Common\Policy]
"AdminClassificationPath"="c:\\Classifications.xml"
"EnableClassifications"=dword:00000001
"TrustClassifications"=dword:00000001
After trying both a network share and a local file, the Classifications still don’t show up in Outlook.
So the only way to get them to show up in Outlook doesn’t allow you to include them in a transport rule (and thus you’re not able to create a rule that allows forwarding inside the domain only)
and the way to get them to show up when creating a transport rule doesn’t seem to work as far as getting them to show in Outlook.
Adding them via PowerShell on the Exchange server actually does get them to show up in OWA the way you would expect, they just won't show in Outlook 2010.
I imagine the issue is with the reg entry that points Outlook to the xml
file….(and I do realize reference given is Offfice 2013) it’s entirely
possible that Office 2010 requires a new key in a slightly different place but
im only seeing references to office 2007 and 2013Making message classification visible in Outlook 2010
On the CAS: New-MessageClassification -Name "Internal Use Only" –DisplayName “Internal Use Email” -RecipientDescription "Internal Only, Don’t forward outside Kdm"
-SenderDescription "tells recipient not to forward outside company”
From Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Scripts
- Run .\Export-OutlookClassification.ps1 > c:\Temp\Classifications.XML
Copy the .XML file to the test client in root of C: (tried other locs also)
Create new reg key (office 2010)
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Common\Policy]
"AdminClassificationPath"="C:\Classifications.xml"
"EnableClassifications"=dword:00000001
"TrustClassifications"=dword:00000001
Reboot client
Should be able to see the message classification when creating a new email.
Why can I see this in my test lab using Outlook 2013 and also see it within OWA but I cannot see the classification within Outlook 2010 (which all my users have)?
Have tried on two laptops. One with MS Office prof. and the other with prof. plus.
I am local admin on both. -
Query regarding vendor classification in Oracle EBS (r12)
Dear All,
We are using a Oracle EBS (r12) purchase module. We are currently discussing to classify our vendors into approved, trial, prospective and debarred. We have been informed that this is not a standard oracle feature but can maintain the classification as mere flex fields. The problem with maintaining the classification as flex fields is that we are unable to achieve the value added services behind this choice to classify vendors. (eg: Trial vendors cannot be used to raise more than 3 purchase orders, we cannot have this restriction setup in the system because the classification will be maintained as flex fields),
If any one can provide some additional info or has experience in performing similar work, please do share the same. This will be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Regards.
SaiIf the profile option HZ: Change Party Name is set to No the update to vendor name is not allowed.
You will get the following error.
Failed to update party: TCA: Return Status:E: Error : Organization name cannot be updated because the HZ: Change Party Name profile option is set to No. -
Hi!
The current version of search of fonts work well. We can say that it works as it should work from the beginning. Congratulations and thank you.
I miss even create a list of fonts by keyword typical font classification.
Sans serif
Without serifs
Serif
With serifs
Slab serif
Thick, block-like serifs
Script
Flowing or calligraphic
Blackletter
Gothic script, “Old English”
Monospaced
Fixed-width
Hand
Handwritten or handmade
Decorative
Swashes, distressed, irregular
For example, as the Typekit.
Best Regards!Hi Mario,
Thanks for the suggestions and feedback. I'll share it with the team. Let us know if you need anything else: [email protected]
Cheers,
Benjamin -
Opening Balance of Investment/Equity.
As we are migrating to BCS system the investment by one entity is not match with equity in another intercompany.
I understand when we execute the COI function initially after loading the opening balance ,the balancing entry goes to Goodwill.
But can these entry be adjusted against the Retained earning due to business scenario since the aquisition is old one, except for BCS.
The question is:
1. it normal to post such entry to 'Retained earnings' using level 30 manual entry.
2.Can the COI function be configured in such a way for selected company codes that these differences go to 'Retained earnings' automatically than update the goodwill.
3.Can a reclassifcation function be used at level 30 to transfer such entry from Goodwill to retained earnings account.
Appreciate to share your experience..Points will be awarded will be helpful answers.1. In many cases we use manual entry for posting level 30 adjustments. However I recommend you include the retained earnings at the time of go-live with the first consolidation AFD entries.
2. It may be possible (not sure) to use retained earnings as the goodwill account in the COI configuration and subsequently change it to the true good will account after the cut-over of first consolidation period. That is unless there is actually a situation where goodwill should be posted in the first period.
3. A reclassification could be used for this conversion. If so, I recommend the task be removed after the first period of using BCS, or the method be limited to the period and year of first consolidation with BCS. As with 2 above, this will not work if there is actually a situation where goodwill should be posted in the first period. -
Hi Team,
We have a requirement to add SupportGroup and Classification as a column in the "List of Incidents" report. WE know that we need to modify the stored procedure to make these columns available in the Dataset. Or can we link 2 dataset in the tablix
in SSRS.
Regards,
Dinesh
Thanks & Regards, DineshI have solved it myself by adding few lines in stored procedure. Would like to share the solution, so that it will be helpful for others.
Open the stored procedure which we are using for the default "List of Incidents" reports.
Add the below under SELECT
SupportGroup = ISNULL(TierQueuesDS.DisplayName, TierQueuesEnum.IncidentTierQueuesValue),
TierQueuesEnum.IncidentTierQueuesId AS TierQueuesId,
Classification = ISNULL(ClassificationDS.DisplayName, ClassificationEnum.IncidentClassificationValue),
ClassificationEnum.IncidentClassificationId AS ClassificationId,
Add the below under FROM
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.IncidentTierQueuesvw AS TierQueuesEnum
ON TierQueuesEnum.IncidentTierQueuesId = I.TierQueue_IncidentTierQueuesId
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.DisplayStringDimvw TierQueuesDS
ON TierQueuesEnum.EnumTypeId=TierQueuesDS.BaseManagedEntityId
AND TierQueuesDS.LanguageCode = @LanguageCode
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.IncidentClassificationvw AS ClassificationEnum
ON ClassificationEnum.IncidentClassificationId = I.Classification_IncidentClassificationId
LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.DisplayStringDimvw ClassificationDS
ON ClassificationEnum.EnumTypeId=ClassificationDS.BaseManagedEntityId
AND ClassificationDS.LanguageCode = @LanguageCode
Then open the report from Report Builder and add new column in the design. Add Support Group and Classification as a column in the report.
Thanks & Regards, Dinesh -
Change of method consolidation - duable data for investment and equity
Dear All!
There are: investor uniu - company A and investee unit - company B.
Company A has had 50% share in company B to 01/2010. - Equity Method.
Company A has added by 50% share in company B to 03/2010. - Puarches Method.
I use activity of investment in AFD for investment and equity. :
When I perform task consolidation of investment there is duble data for investment and equity.
And when I perform task for Change to Consolidation Group I have message Process is not nessecery.
Mabye you know why is process not nessecery?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best regards,
anka
Edited by: Anka on Mar 25, 2011 5:07 PMDear Sir,
Thank you for your answer.
Yes, I have task for change in group consolidation with documents in the posting level 02,12,22. I did not data in group currency, when I task change in group consolidation, but only in local currency. My mistake.
I have a new question:
When I purchase new shares, which the activite of investment I must choose in AFD:
- step aqusition or increase in capitalization?
Thank you in advance for your help.
Best regards,
anka -
Load 'Material Classification' data in to BW from R/3
Hi all,
We want to load the 'Material Classification' data in to BW from R/3. There is no 'Classification' tab with Tcode 'MM03' in R/3. We have very little MM functionality on R/3 with just MARA table. I have to start from the scratch on R/3 side. We don't have any MM Functional consultant.
I read the 'Understand the R/3 Classification System and How to Extract Classification Data into BW' document from BWExpertOnline. It will help on creating the DataSource.
How can I do the Material Classification on R/3 side and what is the best way to proceed on it?
If any one has worked on this type of request, could you please pass any document or share their knowledge, PLEASE ?
Thanks.Do you know what classification data you want to define/add in the R/3 system? I think it is not a technical exercise, more of a functional work where you first have to determine your classification requirements and configure the system accordingly. Do you know what classification you want to use (any examples of how you want a particular material to be classified)? If not, this is not going to work without functional help.
You can explore the config part in SPRO->Cross-application>Classification, and setup the data for classification from main R/3 menucross-application componentsclassification systemmaster data (characteristics, classes). -
There is a requirement that
as per local GAAP , units following equity method
( non consolidated units ) , should identify ( not post )
the goodwill / negative Goodwill which arise out of First
consolidation. as notes to Financial statements.
However during subsequent cons I can post equity holding
adjustments to this investment.
But the problem is system is posting the euity adjustments
as susbsequent consolidation.
So , I want to avoid the First consolidation , but still
be able to post subsequent consolidation.
Please share with me any best posiible way out.we used the statistical investment and equity items in AFD.
If we use statistical items , then system does First
consolidation. It will not post any document in FC.
However equity adjustments postings will happen as per the
investment account given in equity method postings.
Maybe you are looking for
-
SAP HCM Training and Event Management
I am setting up this functionality to track training records and show them as fulfilling qualification needs. From what I can understand from my research, you execute PV15 Follow up to create the history records and match to qualifications. However
-
Accessing the ServletContext from a class that is not a Servlet?
Is there any way of accessing the ServletContext from a class that is not a Servlet? The class is being used as part of a Web Application. Thanks.
-
Can you filter a date range in Numbers 3.1?
It seems crazy... but I can't figure out how to filter a date range in the new Numbers (3.1). In other words, I have a column with individual dates e.g. 31-Dec-2012, 29-Feb-2013, 19-April-2004, etc. I want to filter it so that ONLY the dates from 20
-
Sensible benchmarks for a desktop Linux system?
By the end of the month, I'll have done a massive overhaul of my PC - going to brand spanking new just about everything. But it's not enough to just know that my new system will be faster. I want to know how much faster it is with quantifiable number
-
Hi, We have installed forms 6.0.8.11.3 with jinitiator 1.1.8.16. In the formsweb.cfg we have indicated the right jinitiator version and clsid. Forms server and apache are configurated and running. When trying to thru an URL we get the message: FRM-92