Collection Segment closed due to configuration change

Hi
Our collection supervisor had created new collection groups and assigned them to the colleciton segment. But when she goes into the UDM_BP_GRP transaction to change the collection group assignment to the BP, she is getting this error message:
UDM_BUPA_MSG002 - Collection Segment closed due to configuration change
But the collection segments are still released, assigned to the collection profile. Nothing has changed except that new collection groups have been added.
Has anyone seen this issue before?
Thanks,
Chait

Mark,
Thanks for your reply. The new groups are assigned to the collection segments in the same profile. I tried to change the profile manually in BP thinking that would refresh the segments. But it did not make any difference. Note that it is UDM_BP_GRP that is not working, we can still change the group in the BP directly (UDM_BP).
I never had this issue before and I couldn't find anything on OSS.

Similar Messages

  • 1532E MAP disassociating - Cause=Radio reset due to configuration change.

    Hello,
    have a1532E MAP with WLC 2504 and 7.6.100.0 that shows oddly enough "Cause=Radio reset due to configuration change" and the interface resets.
    Any idea how this comes about without any changes made.
    Relevant log attached.

    After updating to 7.6.120 we've noticed that some of our AP's wouldn't  come up. After looking in the switch's logs I found this
    chassis: Ports  PoE usage has exceeded threshold of 80%.
    The power drawn is 117w (show power-over-ethernet). 
    When I use the following command: show power-over-ethernet brief I get this:
      PoE   | Power  Power    Alloc Alloc Actual Configured  Detection   Power Pre-std
      Port  | Enable Priority By    Power Power  Type        Status      Class Detect
      ----- + ------ -------- ----- ----- ------ ----------- ----------- ----- ------
      1     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  7.0 W              Delivering  3     off
      2     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  7.0 W              Delivering  3     off
      3     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  6.8 W              Delivering  3     off
      4     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  7.1 W              Delivering  3     off
      5     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  7.0 W              Delivering  3     off
      6     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  6.9 W              Delivering  3     off
      7     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  6.8 W              Delivering  3     off
      8     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  6.7 W              Delivering  3     off
      9     | Yes    low      lldp  17 W  6.9 W              Delivering  3     off
      10    | Yes    low      usage 17 W  0.0 W              Disabled    3     off
    Port 10 is where the missing AP is on. 
    How is it possible that after the update to 7.6.120 the AP won't work anymore?

  • Please ensure that the applicationhost.config file is correct and recommit the last configuration changes made

    I am receiving event ID 5189 on Server 2008 R2, IIS 7.5.  I experience this error across a number of servers, each of which is running only the default web site, but have 600+ applications running on the default web site.  Each application
    has its own application pool.  My point is, the applicationhost.config is rather large.
    I have seen a number of posts on this error message, but my issue itself seems to differ somewhat.  I am aware of a similar post: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/3128ee93-1319-4cc2-9257-003512caf476/event-id-5189-microsoftwindowswas?forum=exchangesvrgeneral
    which points to KB http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc734988%28v=ws.10%29.aspx
    However, in my case, it doesn't seem that the extreme measures for this resolution are required.  The error usually indicates a corrupted applicationhost.config that must be manually fixed, or otherwise the WAS service needs to be restarted, or the
    server itself, etc.
    In my case, the issue can usually be fixed by an application pool recycle, or at worst a stop/start.  I have an application which is sensitive to recycles, and so we do not have periodic recycle events configured for this application, which is the bulk
    of the applications on the servers.  It seems to me that this issue is usually caused by the application being in use when there is an applicationhost.config change.
    For instance, we have one application that we deploy using msdeploy.  We found that when we ran an installation for this application via msdeploy, we were receiving this event, and we would subsequently get 500 errors in the application (sometimes the
    application pool corresponds to that which is identified in the event log, sometimes it doesn't).    It seems like applications that were being hit at the time the applicationhost.config was modified by msdeploy were affected.  In an attempt
    to correct this, we moved from msdeploy to a batch file containing appcmd commands.  This also did not resolve the issue.
    I have another application which is installed using PowerShell commandlets.  We started to notice that this script also caused the issue to occur on occasion.  As I continued to identify different processes that resulted in the same issue, I came
    to the conclusion that this is likely due to any change in the applicationhost.config.  I assume the issue is that the applicationhost.config is modified during a read operation to the file by the application pool, or WAS service, and that the recycle
    event, which corrects the issue, forces a re-read of the applicationhost.config, resolving the bad-read issue.
    Has anyone else experienced this, or do you have any recommendations?  My current work-around is to not install any applications during peak hours, and performing an IISRESET after installs are completed, to ensure application stability.
    Message              : The Windows Process Activation Service failed to generate an application pool config file for application pool 'myAppPool'. The error type is '7'. To resolve this issue,
    please ensure that the applicationhost.config file is correct and recommit the last configuration changes made. The data field contains the error number.
    Id                   : 5189
    Version              : 0
    Qualifiers           : 49152
    Level                : 2
    Task                 : 0
    Opcode               : 0
    Keywords             : 36028797018963968
    RecordId             : 324108
    ProviderName         : Microsoft-Windows-WAS
    ProviderId           : 524b5d04-133c-4a62-8362-64e8edb9ce40
    LogName              : System
    ProcessId            : 0
    ThreadId             : 0
    MachineName          : MyComputer
    TimeCreated          : 3/3/2014 9:03:24 PM
    ContainerLog         : system
    MatchedQueryIds      : {}
    Bookmark             : System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventBookmark
    LevelDisplayName     : Error
    KeywordsDisplayNames : {Classic}
    Properties           : {System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventProperty, System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventProperty, System.Diagnostics.Eventing.Reader.EventProperty}

    As an update to this issue, after doing some research, it appears the behavior is related to a new feature in IIS7 called Application Pool Isolation (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd163536.aspx).
    This new feature prevents cross-application spillage by isolating the configuration for each application pool in IIS.  So in reality, an application pool never actually reads the applicationhost.config - that is just a master file, and each time it
    is update, it triggers a change to the individual application pool configuration files, located in C:\inetpub\temp\apppools.
    We did try setting Advanced Settings > Disable Recycling for Configuration Change to true, but after an IIS reset we were still able to reproduce the issue - worse actually, because in our test program, which continually hits the web
    service, and also continually makes apphost.config changes, when the two events collide, the 500.19 issue precipitates; but after an additional change to the apphost.config, it seems that the additional changes will actually correct the issue (seemingly forcing
    another recycle, which is also how we resolve the issue manually); after making this setting adjustment, once the 500.19 issue precipitates, additional changes to the apphost.config does not correct the problem, only a manual recycle corrects it.  This
    is the recycling.disallowRotationOnConfigChange property of the app pool.  We also set the setting for recycling.disallowOverlappingRotation to True as well, with the same result.
    We ARE able to prevent this issue by setting the C:\inetpub\temp\apppools\myapppool\myapppool.config to read-only, but for obvious reasons, this is not a desired work-around.
    It seems like what is happening is that any change to the ApplicationHost.config is resulting in each of the C:\inetpub\temp\apppools temp application pool config files being updated as well, in addition to triggering an application pool recycle.  It
    seems to me the desired behavior would be that these files are only updated if the applicationhost.config changes are specific to that application pool - but that doesn't seem to be the behavior.
    After turning on failed request tracing, I was able to narrow the error down more:
    ModuleName
    AnonymousAuthenticationModule
    Notification
    2
    HttpStatus
    500
    HttpReason
    Internal Server Error
    HttpSubStatus
    19
    ErrorCode
    2147942413
    ConfigExceptionInfo
    \\?\C:\inetpub\application\application\web.config ( 9) :Failed to decrypt attribute 'password'
    Notification
    AUTHENTICATE_REQUEST
    ErrorCode
    The data is invalid. (0x8007000d)
    This seems to be pretty static.  Trying to look into possible causes of this issue.

  • Synchronize configuration changes among SUN One Application cluster

    How to do the synchronization of configuration changes among the SUN One Application clustering.
    I need to replicate the configuration changes from Appserver1 to appserver2, which is in the cluster farms.
    Prakash

    hi i'm a colleague of Mirza.
    We have modified the web.xml and now server is asking for password. We dont want to specify a particular role name in authorization-constraint. We need all our authenticated users to access the application. When i remove the auth-constraint tag from the web.xml it does not not allow the user to acess the application and gives me the error "Access to the specified resource has been forbidden". To remedy this we have created a group called "authenticated" in our ldap directory server and put all the users in that group. Now even though i'm specifying in auth-constraint .. the role-name to be "authenticated" but its still not granting the user permission to the access the application.
    here is the snippet of my web.xml
    <security-constraint>
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>PAMS</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
    <http-method>GET</http-method>
    <http-method>POST</http-method>
    </web-resource-collection>
    <auth-constraint>
    <role-name>authenticated</role-name>
    </auth-constraint>
    </security-constraint>
    <login-config>
    <auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
    <realm-name> ldap</realm-name>
    </login-config>
    <security-role>
    <role-name>authenticated</role-name>
    </security-role>
    I need to know what ever I am doing is correct.

  • BGP Notification received, configuration change

    Hi,
    We are  monitoring a BGP peering flap for a fraction of seconds approximately every three days for a particular neighbor. We are seeing this behavior consistently for a Month.
    Jun 10 08:55:15.566 NST: bgp[1041]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-ADJCHANGE : neighbor x.x.x.x Down - BGP Notification received, configuration change (VRF: default)
    Jun 10 08:55:15.565 NST: bgp[1041]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-NBR_NSR_DISABLED_STANDBY : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x on standby due to BGP Notification received (VRF: default)
    Would like to know what does the error messge indicates  "BGP Notification received, configuration change"

    There might be a clue in the bgp trace on the device that experienced this condition:
    show bgp trace and look around the time of the notification down.
    Depending on what is on the other side, I think that hte investigation is better done on that node as that was the originator of the change hence bringing the peer down.
    This can be as simple as an address family add or remove, things like that. When capabilities of a peer change, they have to bring down the peering since they are only sent in the OPEN message.
    IF it is very periodic, I would also verify and check what might be happening during those time windows, especially on the peer. Maybe there is a config script that could induce things.
    If that peer is an XR device, the bgp trace will be very helpful in that regard.
    If itis an IOS device, then maybe you need to keep running some debug bgp event for around the time that you expect this flap, and a syslog analysis (sh log) around that time for clues.
    xander

  • ACS Applying configuration changes failed

    Hello
    I have a problem with ACS version 5.1.0.44.6. running on 1120 appliance.
    After making some changes to authorization rules of Device Admin access services, I can no loger access authorization page for Device admin access services. Error on Access Policies page is: . This System Faliure occurred: {0}. Your changes have not been saved. Click OK to return to the list page.
    Logs recorded this:
    Severity         
    FATAL
    Message                                                                                                           
    Applaying configuration changes failed 
    Category
    CSOacs_Internal_Opreations_Diagnostics
    Code
    31102 
    Details
    LastErrorMessage=Policy DB problem: Policy value type is not supported. ConfigTransactionID=2968
    After this we can no longer authenticate on any device with TACACS+. Telnet from switch to the ACS server on port 49 returns  % Connection refused by remote host. RADIUS authentication and authorization for VPN users on same server is working fine.
    Do you have any idea how to solve this problem?
    Hrvoje

    Thanks for the screenshot! 
    It appeared to be an issue in StatusMonitor that I also could reproduce: we don’t work correctly with the structure when virtual directories and applications are mixed, i.e. due to this bug we cannot find web application if it’s under the virtual directory,
    that’s under the web site.
    I.e. app named WebSite/Dir/App1 cannot be found by SM during adding application insights:
    WebSite
       ---> Dir (virtual directory)
              ---> App1 (web application)
    We'll triage this bug and address in one of the nearest StatusMonitor updates.
    Thanks for finding this issue!

  • "configuration changed"

    Hello,
    I am getting strange emails when I know that nobody did not do anything with the router - WRVS4400N v2 with newest FW. I am sure because I am only one person who knows the password to the webinterface.
    Long time ago I have turned on email norifications and I am getting info about dleting record in ARP table, initialization  router and others.
    But what is very strange for me from time to time I am getting information DATE 12:30:00  - Configuration changed!
    What is impressive - router did not restart itself. And what is more impressive - time is always similar - please look - 12:30:01, 12:30:00
    I have got more this messages earlier -
    -below was exactly 7 days between notifications-
    Mar 22 12:30:01  - Configuration changed!
    Mar 15 12:30:01  - Configuration changed!
    -below was exactly 7 days between notifications-
    Mar  8 12:30:00  - Configuration changed!
    Mar  1 12:30:00  - Configuration changed!
    -below was exactly 7 days between notifications-
    Feb 22 12:30:00  - Configuration changed!
    Feb 15 12:30:00  - Configuration changed!
    I am sure that any authorized person do not do anything with the router. I am only one person who knows password. I have changed this password long time ago by administration tab in the router web interfce. I have remote administration turned off.
    Is it any other possibility to manage device? By ssh, telnet ? on which specific ports? Time suggests that this is not 'human modify', rather any script. I cannot disconnect router due to non-stop usage, so I have to ask you did you ever seen something similar.

    Hi Miroslaw, thank you for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan I am part of the Small business Support Community. Do you have any configuration by schedule?Such an ACL or Internet Access Policy.?
    It could be causing those logs, so you could check your firewalls and figure it out.
    If the issue continues you could perform a factory reset and configure you device manually in order to avoid the same issue in the new configuration.
    I hope you find this answer useful
    “Please rate useful posts so other users can benefit from it”
    Greetings, 
    Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
    Cisco Network Support Engineer.

  • Help me configure Change request management !!!

    Dear friends,
    I am Going to Configure Change request Management, so just to ensure that the configuration is not erronous, i would need Expert advise..
    Just want to know Clear few things before i proceed..
    I am also refering SPRO and related notes
    Scenario :
    I have two SYSTEMS SAP ECC 6.0 with System id R03 and Soluiton manager with SYSTEM id SOL,
    R03 has 3 clients, 300 600 700..
    In R03 300 is the development client, 600 is quality client, 700 is the production client.
    SOL has 2 clients, 100, 200
    With 200 as the production client.
    Q.1) <b>Do i have to configure CHARM in both the client (100 and 200 of SOLMAN).</b>
    Q.2) Initially I had tried to set CHARM in client 100 of solman, but later on realized that it has to be set up in client 200.
    When i logon to client 200 and  Execute IMG activity Spro-> sap soltion manger->basic settings-> sap solution manager system->activate integration with change request management.
    Then by default it take the previous client ( client 100) as the change request management client.
    ( as we know there are three steps in the above activity ), the other activity are executed properly, only prblem being that the default client is always set to 100, which should not be the case).
    I do get the prompt saying ( "The change request clent is set to clent 100, do u want to change to client 200, on clicking yes, still it is always set the same client 100 as charm client ")
    <b>Plz let me know what do i do to set the change request client to 200??</b>
    Q.3) Regarding TMS, we have local domain controller in solman and local domain in R3.
    We are planing to establish domain links between the two systems( ie both the domain controllers) ??
    Is this the right strategy ??
    <b>Any other method that u can recommend  ??</b>
    Q.4)One of the IMG activity says, Generate Destinations to client 000 of all the domain controllers..
    Whenever i do this these, destinations are created with errors, i am not able to create trusted RFC destinations without errors.
    When i logon to satellite domain controler and excecute sm59 there are 2 destinations created Trusted and BACK.
    These destinations works well,
    but when i logon to Solman, got to sm59 , when i test the TMW and TRUSTED rfc destinations  i test these destinations using Remote Logon i get error,
    " no authorization to logon as trusted system"
    I went thru one note which recomended Kernel upgrades to solve the problem,
    I r3 my kernel relaese is 700 with patch level 56, the note recomends to apply patch 80, did u have these problems??
    <b>what is your kernel patch levels in sateliite and solman systems.</b>
    Q.5) TO be able to raise tickets from R3 to solman we create RFC destinations.
    We also create RFC destinations to client 000 of all the sateliite system,
    <b>dont u think these RFC destinations might interfere with each other??</b>
    Q.6) Is there anyone who has successfully configured CHARM. Can you plz share the  configuration documents with me..
    Please note :
    <b>All the contributors would be handesomely rewarded with points .</b>

    Hi,
    Check this
    Note 128447 - Trusted/Trusting Systems
    For your Q4.
    Q3.)
    Establishing Domain link - That's the right way. Go ahead.
    These are the steps.
    <b>1.Define Transport Routes for System Landscape</b>
    assign exactly one development system to a production system, and that these two systems are connected by exactly one unique transport track. If a development system and a production system are connected by more than one transport track, this may lead to inconsistencies within the transport distribution. This type of transport configuration cannot be supported by Change Request Management, and may cause inconsistencies within the tools involved.
    <b>2. Activate Extended Transport Control</b>
    The CTC parameter should be '1'
    <b>3.Configure Transport Strategy</b>
    Deactivate the QA Approval.
    <b>4. Activate Trusted Services.</b>
    5.Activate Domain Links.
    You have to activate domain link between systems.
    6. Generate RFC Destinations to Client 000
    Hope this helps.
    feel free to revert back.
    --Ragu

  • Session closed due to Error: Could not Resolve hos...

    Hi,
    I''m trying to sort out connection issues for my auntie. She has a BT Homehub 5 with the latest firmware.
    However, she is suffering from reboots and lost connections all the time. I have reviewed the log files and it is full of the following messages:
    74.270000 CWMP Session closed due to error: Could not resolve host
    Any ideas as i am stumped. Its a fairly recent installation ( 4 months or so) and she has only recently started to use the Wifi. It was ok when wired.
    Simon

    If it is DEFINITELY a wireless problem only, then download InSSider and run the program. This will tell you if you have are using a congested wifi channel.......
    You can then go into the settings and after picking a less congested channel, turn off the "smart wireless" setting.....
    Although the wireless problem wouldn't cause the rebooting problem......
    If you found this post helpful, then please click the star on the left, after all, I'm only trying to help........

  • Logging CRS configuration changes

    Hallo,
    in a 10.1 RAC environment,
    is there a file which logs CRS configuration changes, like issuing a oifcfg -setif command?
    Thx

    Yes

  • MissingResourceException when I iterator a collection after closing the PM

    I retrieve a collection, call pm.retrieveAll on it, and then close the PM.
    When I try to iterator over the collection, I get a
    MissingResourceException. I can't figure out why I'm getting the exception,
    if I do a retrieveAll it should retrieve all the fields of all the objects
    in the collection. It's as if there is a rule "Thou shall not iterator over
    a collection after closing the PM". Is this true?
    java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle
    java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key resultlist-closed
    at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:314)
    at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:274)
    at serp.util.Localizer.get(Localizer.java:270)
    at serp.util.Localizer.get(Localizer.java:121)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.checkClosed(LazyResult
    List.java:349)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.listIterator(LazyResul
    tList.java:403)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.iterator(LazyResultLis
    t.java:397)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.services.SchedulerService.getMonitorsToRun(SchedulerS
    ervice.java:103)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.services.SchedulerService.schedule(SchedulerService.j
    ava:59)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.web.util.TimerServlet$scheduleTask.run(TimerServlet.j
    ava:84)
    at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:432)
    at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
    Here is my code:
    private Collection getMonitorsToRun() {
    Collection c = new LinkedList();
    PersistenceManager pm = null;
    try {
    pm = JDOFactory.getPersistenceManager();
    Extent extent = pm.getExtent(Monitor.class, true);
    String filter = "nextDate <= now";
    Query q = pm.newQuery(extent, filter);
    q.declareParameters("java.util.Date now");
    q.setOrdering("nextDate ascending");
    Hashtable p = new Hashtable();
    p.put("now", new Date());
    c = (Collection) q.executeWithMap(p);
    pm.retrieveAll(c);
    } catch (JDOException e) {
    log.warn("Received JDO Exception while retrieving Monitors " + e);
    } finally {
    pm.close();
    log.debug("Retrieved " + c.size() + " Monitors ready to be ran.");
    Iterator i = c.iterator();
    while (i.hasNext()) {
    Monitor m = (Monitor) i.next();
    log.debug("m id = " + m.getId());
    return c;

    It appears to be a query in which case, yes, a Query result Collection cannot be iterated over.
    The simple way to bypass this is to transfer the results to a non-closing Collection.
    Collection results = (Collection) q.execute ();
    results = new LinkedList (results);
    pm.retrieveAll (results);
    pm.close ();
    On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:49:17 +0100, Michael Mattox wrote:
    I retrieve a collection, call pm.retrieveAll on it, and then close the PM.
    When I try to iterator over the collection, I get a
    MissingResourceException. I can't figure out why I'm getting the exception,
    if I do a retrieveAll it should retrieve all the fields of all the objects
    in the collection. It's as if there is a rule "Thou shall not iterator over
    a collection after closing the PM". Is this true?
    java.util.MissingResourceException: Can't find resource for bundle
    java.util.PropertyResourceBundle, key resultlist-closed
    at java.util.ResourceBundle.getObject(ResourceBundle.java:314)
    at java.util.ResourceBundle.getString(ResourceBundle.java:274)
    at serp.util.Localizer.get(Localizer.java:270)
    at serp.util.Localizer.get(Localizer.java:121)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.checkClosed(LazyResult
    List.java:349)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.listIterator(LazyResul
    tList.java:403)
    at
    com.solarmetric.kodo.impl.jdbc.runtime.LazyResultList.iterator(LazyResultLis
    t.java:397)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.services.SchedulerService.getMonitorsToRun(SchedulerS
    ervice.java:103)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.services.SchedulerService.schedule(SchedulerService.j
    ava:59)
    at
    com.verideon.siteguard.web.util.TimerServlet$scheduleTask.run(TimerServlet.j
    ava:84)
    at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:432)
    at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:382)
    Here is my code:
    private Collection getMonitorsToRun() {
    Collection c = new LinkedList();
    PersistenceManager pm = null;
    try {
    pm = JDOFactory.getPersistenceManager();
    Extent extent = pm.getExtent(Monitor.class, true);
    String filter = "nextDate <= now";
    Query q = pm.newQuery(extent, filter);
    q.declareParameters("java.util.Date now");
    q.setOrdering("nextDate ascending");
    Hashtable p = new Hashtable();
    p.put("now", new Date());
    c = (Collection) q.executeWithMap(p);
    pm.retrieveAll(c);
    } catch (JDOException e) {
    log.warn("Received JDO Exception while retrieving Monitors " + e);
    } finally {
    pm.close();
    log.debug("Retrieved " + c.size() + " Monitors ready to be ran.");
    Iterator i = c.iterator();
    while (i.hasNext()) {
    Monitor m = (Monitor) i.next();
    log.debug("m id = " + m.getId());
    return c;
    Stephen Kim
    [email protected]
    SolarMetric, Inc.
    http://www.solarmetric.com

  • Closing and saving spreadsheet changes in the same document?

    Closing and saving spreadsheet changes in the same document? There are several drop-down options for saving a spreadsheet in Numbers except saving to the existing spreadsheet. Excel has a 'save' or 'save as' options what are the equivilents in Numbers?
    Thanks for any response,
    Larry

    Hi Larry,
    Menu > File > Save (command s) will save the document. If it has not already been saved, it will offer "Untitled" as the name. Type a name and choose a folder.
    Numbers (and any app on OS X Mavericks) has Menu > File > Save, and Menu > File > Duplicate.
    To see Save As... hold down the option key when using the File Menu. "Duplicate" will change to "Save As..."
    Regards,
    Ian.

  • Anyone Seen this Message Before "Configuration changes for domain saved to the repository."

    I'm running into this situation where one of my WLS servers is generating the following
    messages "Configuration changes for domain saved to the repository." This process
    of saving to a repository is causing an issue on start-up. Typically my deployments
    take 2-3 minutes on start-up. They are now taking 10 minutes. I've made no changes
    to my application. I've been able to identify that this process of saving to a
    repository is the main issue of contention....
    Anyone know what the message means? Anyone know how to disable this message?

    This is just WebLogic writing back changes to config.xml, which it does from time
    to time for reasons like:
    - your app deployment has changed.
    - you've reconfigured something in the console.
    etc...
    WebLogic just spins this off into a handy execute thread, so it would be surprising
    if this was causing your app deployment to slow down (how do you know it is).
    In my experience, slower than normal app deployments are usually down to:
    - waiting for database connections.
    - waiting for connecitons to other external resources.
    Remember (in WLS6.x anyway) initialisation is done serially on the main thread,
    so if something's slow, everything gets blocked behind it.
    simon.
    I'm running into this situation where one of my WLS servers is generatingthe following
    messages "Configuration changes for domain saved to the repository."This process
    of saving to a repository is causing an issue on start-up. Typicallymy deployments
    take 2-3 minutes on start-up. They are now taking 10 minutes. I'vemade no changes
    to my application. I've been able to identify that this process ofsaving to a
    repository is the main issue of contention....
    Anyone know what the message means? Anyone know how to disable thismessage?

  • How to prevent BGP code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change)

    Can anyone tell How to prevent BGP code 6 (Cease) subcode 6 (Other Configuration Change) ?
    We are facing frequent problem with this error. Please suggest how to stop this.... 
    Note :- We are using BGP VPN between this peers.
    Logs :
    Date/Time     : 2015-04-30 00:49:40+05:30
     State         : Up
     Date/Time     : 2015-04-30 00:39:05+05:30
     State         : Down
     Error Code    : 6(CEASE)
     Error Subcode : 6(Other Configuration Change)
     Notification  : Send Notification
     Date/Time     : 2015-04-29 18:22:11+05:30
     State         : Up
     Date/Time     : 2015-04-29 18:21:39+05:30
     State         : Down
     Error Code    : 6(CEASE)
     Error Subcode : 6(Other Configuration Change)
     Notification  : Send Notification

    on the same dates you mean the same request are posted in IT2001? ie both full days?
    Please clarify
    usually the Time collision checks are followed only via posting using report rptarqpost and not while applying through portal in ESS
    This is very strange you indicate
    SO you need to check the basic tables first
    You may need to check the collision.
    Collisions Tables V_T554Y and V_554Y_B reaction indicators.
    and V_T508A
    able T582A set to time constraint of "Z
    In backend Pa30 collision works like this
    1) the logical collision, checks if there is an overlap in the validity
    interval of the IT´s (begda, endda).
    2) the physical collision, checks if there is an overlap in the time
    interval of the IT's.
    In the logical collision it is checked if there is an overlap in the
    validity interval if at least one of the records is a full-day
    ( that is the case when you enter a Daily Work Schedule (DWS) )
    So when one of the records has a DWS it is considered to be a full day
    record and the logical collision is taken into consideration.
    If instead you enter the only the time interval manually the records
    are considered to be partial-day and the physical collision is
    performed. In that case only the time interval is important.
    So if the clock times are not entered the physical collision can not
    take place.
    The collision functionality is always based on clock times and dates,
    never on the total nr of hours.
    Edited by: Siddharth Rajora on Sep 21, 2011 4:57 PM

  • X121e bios loop : "configuration changed - restart the system"

    After changing some settings in BIOS i got stuck in a reboot - loop.
    * Cannot access the BIOS any more - pressing F1 changes the message to "Entering BIOS Setup Utility" followed by the message "configuration changed - restart the system"
    * F12 changes the message to "Preparing Boot Device List" followed by  "configuration changed - restart the system" and the system reboots again.
    * Tried to remove the battery, pressing the power button for 10-15 sec. and reboot with AC Adapter connected
    * Tried to remove the battery and unplug the bios battery for 3 days the reset the bios - doesn't work
    * Tried to boot via USB (BIOS update, FreeDOS with BIOS update, Ubuntu-Live-USB) - nothing worked .. didn't change the boot-order - i always prefer USB boot
    * Removing hard-disk produces the message "no operating system found"
    Are there any tricks for resetting the BIOS to defaults, flashing BIOS without booting from USB?
    see
    * http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/ThinkPad-Edge-S-series/E-325-bios-settings-changed-keeps-rebooting/td-p/...
    * http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/X-Serie-ThinkPad-Notebooks-inkl/x121e-Configuration-changed-Restart-Syst...
    - there are several people with this issue ...

    In service center they said that motherboard is glitchy and needs replacement.
    So it was a hardware fault.

Maybe you are looking for