Company restructuring

Hi gurus,
My company is udergoing restructuring exercise, we need to migrate company code 1000 to 5000.
Beside creating new company code, we also need to migrate all open items from 1000 to 5000. This is to ensure the account balances for vendor, customer and GL are identical in both company codes.
Can anyone tell me what is the best practise to migrate these open items?
1. Vendor open items - Item where PO issued and GR but not invoiced
2. Asset balances - Should I bring over the net book value, as well as the accum & depre?
3. Inventory items - Stock transfer from plant to plant?
Thanks much for your help.
Regards
Chin

Hello,
We are having the same issue. Would you please advise what solution you used to correct this.
Thanks,
Jordan

Similar Messages

How do i set up MFE on E71 when i have essential i...

I am trying to set up my works email on my E71 and i have read every self help guide available on line but everyone of them asks you to enter your domain and exchange server.
Unfortunately due to a company restructure i.e. redundancies at work, getting this information from IT is proving pretty much impossible. Am i able to access this info through my outlook screen or elsewhere?
Cheers

Nice boss you have. You need the info about the server. Otherwise it's no use.
‡Thank you for hitting the Blue/Green Star button‡
N8-00 RM 596 V:111.030.0609; E71-1(05) RM 346 V: 500.21.009

Need help querying multiple tables...

Afternoon...
I'm brand new to crystal, with literally 1.5 hours at most under my belt.
Some how during company restructuring CR got thrown on my plate.
I just built a report that pulls aged data from our call center's DB (We're running BMC Remedy for call tracking stored on a UNIX, Oracle 9i box)
What I am trying to do is select and sum time values in another table, base on the record selection for the current table.
The record selection is:
{CSG_ENTERPRISE_LOOKUP.Account_Number} like "033CDCO*" and
{CSG_ENTERPRISE_LOOKUP.Create_Date} in Aged0To30Days
I added and linked to another table by an enterprise record id. I'd like to grab all records from CSG_Join_Outer_Incident__to_Ticket that have "description LIKE "Incoming%" OR description LIKE "Outgoing%"" where the enterprise ticket numbers match. It should take the times of all records found, then sum and report them to the report as RPT_Total_time.
I haven't been able to find a solution to do this... I thought about a Union, or the following query:
select sum(Total_Time) from CSG_Join_Outer_Incident__to_Ticket where CSG_ENTERPRISE_LOOKUP."Escalation__Tkt_ID" = CSG_Join_Outer_Incident__to_Ticket."Escalation__Tkt_ID" and (CSG_Join_Outer_Incident__to_Ticket."Description" LIKE 'Incoming%' OR CSG_Join_Outer_Incident__to_Ticket."Description" LIKE 'Outgoing%') as RPT_Total_Time
Crystal does like anything I'm doing... I can't find anything of use on the web... and XI, which I have will not run on our reporting server that this report runs on (8.5)
Ideas? Suggestions?
Thanks.

Look at hte JTable API. You'll find a link to the tutorial.
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/table.html

Creation of New Company in existing SAP system

What are the major issues involved in a Business running SAP taking over a new non-SAP company and trying to merge the new enterprise into its existing system? Are there any case studies of this type of acquisition/merger available and also step by step config? I want to use the same company code for the new Company.

Hi,
You need to go for a rollout to meet your requirements.
The configuration comes after the preparatio of blue prints, you may need to restructure the business process in the Non-SAP company.
Then you need to structure the data of Non-SAP company in accordance with that of the existing data in SAP. Like Business Area or Profit Center or Cost Center etc.
Thnaks
VK

Creation of new company in existing SAP

What are the major issues involved in a Business running SAP taking over a new non-SAP company and trying to merge the new enterprise into its existing system? Are there any case studies of this type of acquisition/merger available and also step by step config?

Hi,
You need to go for a rollout to meet your requirements.
The configuration comes after the preparatio of blue prints, you may need to restructure the business process in the Non-SAP company.
Then you need to structure the data of Non-SAP company in accordance with that of the existing data in SAP. Like Business Area or Profit Center or Cost Center etc.
Thnaks
VK

Single Step STO Mvt 301 for Stock transfer beteen Company code during Cutover

Dear All ;
I am Planning to use Movement type 301 ie single step STO Beteeen two different company code at the time of Cutover .Is it a feasible solution ?
I am Currently handling a Org Restructuring Project ,Where one company code will be broken into five different company code ( Including Old Company code ) ,and old som of the stock of old company code needed to be shifted to new 4 company codes .
In this Context i am thinking to use 301 ,will it be a feasible solution ?
I have tested in IDES ,It is working ,But I need to be confirm as there is hudge data to be migrated .
Best Regadsl;
Joydeep Mukherjee

Hi Joy,
You can do this in one step as you already have tested in IDES, but depends on your business requirement that in which way you want to handle your stock transfers either by using one step or two steps movement types or by using stock transport orders. Using STO is a good approach for stock transfers between two company codes.
See the below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/en/a5/63391843a211d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
regards,
anoop Singh

Project System Restructuring -- Reporting Requirement

Hi All,
Due to Restructuring in our client.Our Project System is adopting the following method and asking for BI input on this please let me know if anyone has come across this situation.
Projects are going to move from one Company Code to another Company Code. So they are closing the existing projects in Old Comp. Code and new projects are being created in New Comp. Code . In doing so they are closing the Old Projects(say P1 u2013 total budget 100) consumed 60 and then new project they will create with remaining balance 40. (say P2). Also
Reporting Requirement :
Then when they run the report for the New Project P2 then it should bring the information of P1 also.
Please let me if it is possible to achieve this.
Regards,
Mayank

interesting, load previous data in a cube completely for all the previous years and have the new data load in another cube and create a multiprovider to join them. and in your selection for wbs use both data selection...thats all i can think of on top of my head..

Company code vs profit center in FI

Hi all,
I have a question in restructuring our financial organization in sap. We are one company with one operating concern, one controlling area, one company code and one chart of account. We also have several locations in America. Lately, we have acquired another company with several other locations in America.
There are 2 ways of including the new company when we restructure in sap financial side.
A) Use company code to represent each company.
Thus, under our holding company, we would have our company, new company location A, new company location B, new company location C and one company for real estate purpose for our building. This means 5 new company codes with multiple chart of accounts.
B) Use profit centers to represent each company
Thus, we would have 5 new profit centers.
Both ways work very well for income statement. Option B is a little iffy on Balance Sheet.
Question is: How easy is it to maintain separate Balance Sheet between option A and B ?
What are the pro and cons of both options ?
Have anyone come across this ?
thanks
Joyce

Hi ,
It is always recommended to go with , 1 co code per seperate legal entity as explained by ajay .
Moreover you can have balance sheet and profit and loss a/c at profit center level with New GL .
Also check on the operational issues like for Eg. depritiation run can be executed at co code level only and not at profit center level just for example . then a question should not come why have we not considered this at the time of org structure finalization .
Secondly , also check on the authorization issues in case of Assets account to be particular as the authorizations work at co code level and at asset class level . so if a requirement comes that profit center wise viewing should happen then you will have to move on to have modifications .
I would suggest that along with your considerations on legal reporting and keeping in mind the operation issues that may crop up take a final call on the same .
Regards ,
Dewang T

Profit center assignment to company code

Hi,
We have 1 controlling area & 3 company codes A, B & C. We are restructuring Cost Centers & Profit Centers for company code A. Out of the 3 company codes, B has no separate profit center standard hierarchy. The cost centers of B are currently assigned to profit centers of A.
Now that we are changing all the cost centers & profit centers of A, how do we deal with the cost centers of B which are assigned to the old profit centers of A?
If I try to change the master data of Profit centers of A to exclude the company code assignment of A & only have company code assignment of B so that the cost centers of B are the only ones assigned to old profit centers of A, system throws an error saying that :
Cost centers assigned to the profit center are contained in the company code in question.
Procedure:
    Remove the existing assignment between Cost center **** and profit
    center ***. Note that other assignments might exist, which you will
    also have to remove before you can delete the profit center. For an overview of all existing assignments, use the assignment monitor.
Is there any other solution to this? Can the Profit center assignment to company code be time-dependant?
Or will we have to keep the old profit centers of A unlocked for cost centers of B & use some validations to prevent posting of Compnay code A transactions to old cost/ profit centers.
Regards,
Sangeeta

Hello,
We are having the same issue. Would you please advise what solution you used to correct this.
Thanks,
Jordan

Migrating 3 company codes data to 1 company code.

Hi all,
We are one legal entity, imparting educational training and operating its activities at three locations namely Gurgaon, Dehradun and
Rajamundary. In addition it has two administrative offices at Delhi and Mumbai besides a few other rented premises.
The implementation team has created one company as XYZ and created three separate company codes for each of the operational unit at Gurgaon, Dehradun and Rajamundary. All the existing company codes have been assigned to one Chart of Account. The operating units are neither independent legal entities nor are required to generate location-wise Final Accounts.
However the existing system is not meeting our requirement and we wish to operate thru one company code only.
Accordingly we plan to generate one more company code and migrate all the data from existing three company codes to this new one on a pre fix
cut off date. After that we will record all the transactions in this new
company code only and the existing codes would not be used further.
In this regard please advise us the steps required to be followed to migrate the combined data of three company codes to one company code.
Kind Regards,
Sudhanshu
Edited by: Sudhanshu Sharma on Feb 11, 2008 11:38 AM

please find some info on SAP SLO
Sell-off of parts of the company
A company group sells the portfolio of one of its divisions to another company. As a result, the data that relates to the sold company division must be removed from the groups SAP system, and transferred to the new owner.
With the "client separation service, SLO offers two possible approaches to the solution. Either the data that the sold part of the company needs is migrated to a new client using one of the data transfer methods (Legacy System Migration Workbench or Migration Workbench), or a client copy is created for the sold part of the company, and the data that the parent company no longer requires is removed from the client copy using the SLO service "delete company code.
Company merger
A company buys or takes over another company. The acquired company uses a different material numbering system than the buying company, for example. However, from the point of acquisition on, the same material numbers must be used, and it is therefore necessary to change the material numbers of the bought company.
With the SLO conversion service "material number conversion, the material numbers of the bought company are changed so that they correspond to the naming conventions used in the parent company. This is done using the Conversion Workbench.
Reorganization/restructuring in the company
A company was previously organized according to regions, and based its SAP system on this structure. However, an analysis of business processes reveals that a central, function-based organization would considerably increase efficiency in controlling. As a result, the controlling areas used to map the structure of the company in the SAP system must be adjusted accordingly.
With the help of the SLO service "controlling area merge and the Conversion Workbench, the old controlling areas, which were set up on a regional basis, can be merged into central units.
Optimization of business processes
In a government department, different standard charts of accounts are used for external and internal financial reporting. The duplicate work that this entails is becoming increasingly time-consuming and error-prone. The managers responsible decide that the external chart of accounts could also be used internally. As a result, the chart of account in the government departments SAP system must be adjusted to reflect this change.
The SLO conversion service "chart of account conversion makes it possible to rename or merge accounts and cost elements in the chart of account so that they meet the new requirements. The assignment table in which the changes are defined is retained in the SAP system after conversion for documentation purposes for an external audit, for example.
http://www.sap.info/public/INT/int/index/Category-12613c61affe7a5bc-int/-1/articleContainer-70353ed226f24a312

Adobe restructuring, Paul Guerette, et al

As a lot of you will have heard, Adobe has undergone a reorganisation (http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/201111/110811AdobeFinancialAnalyst Meeting.html). The LiveCycle/ADEP team in Ottawa was hit badly by this restructuring, which means that we may not be seeing some of the familiar faces here or on other forums.
In particular, I know that Paul has moved on and that he would like people to be aware that he will not be able to respond to threads. In addition he will not get Direct Messages/Private Message or emails to the LiveCycle8 address.
Paul was a tremendous help on the forums and we all own him a debt of gratitude.
Niall

I took the recent "re-branding" of Livecycle ES to ADEP and the launch of Designer 10 as part of a strategy to extend and develop the product line. The restructuring seems to indicate the opposite.
There must be something on the horizon that has caused such a shift by a profitable company. Is it HTML5? or perhaps there is a different up-and-coming threat lurking out there? A patent issue? Whatever is going on, the restructuring strikes me as a defensive move. Is it time to rethink my my ongoing development ADEP forms? I don't know. I wish I knew the level of Adobe's commitment to it.
Paul is a knowledgable, giving resource who will be missed. I am confident that he will land on his feet. I wish him well.
Stephen

Payroll Restructuring

Hi Experts,
How to change the salaries from grade wise to CTC , due to restructuring in the payroll in the company.
Before the salary in the organisation was based on the grades only. Now the Client wants the Salary according to The CTC of the employees.
How the configuration to be done and what is the difference between two and what all the changes will takes place .
Regards
kishore C George

you have to chnage to CTc structure have to start from starting,
under basic pay all node

Verizon customer service and new direction company has taken...?

November 15, 2013
To whom it may concern:
I will make this letter brief, knowing I will not get a response because of the lack of Values Verizon holds!
Most recently, your company has deliberately failed to honor previously made guarantees with their unlimited plan. I have fought this issue for about a year but I have recently accepted this and attempted to give Verizon another opportunity to show they value their loyal customers.
I had set up a third line two years ago for my paraplegic brother, whom I care for. Due to unexpected circumstances, the line has not been used. I attempted to restructure my contract ONE-month early without a greedy penalty from Verizon. Again, I was disappointed with a total disregard to customer care. Verizon representatives were not willing to waive a ONE-month early cancellation fee for an unused third line, even when I was going to upgrade my phone and give-in to Verizon's greed with the restructure of my unlimited plan.
I understand that my contract is just a "Speck of Dust in a Vast Desert", but I thought that just maybe, Verizon still valued their loyal customers to eat a greedy fee in that same vast desert. I was wrong, again...
You will lose a loyal customer on 12/19/2013, when I will only have to pay for one cancellation fee. Thank you Verizon for your new direction with no values or customer care! Better yet, especially with your company's treatment of a loyal VETERAN customer!
Respectfully,
Dan
>Personal info removed<
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator><

It is sad when greed is the leader in corporate operations. That we pay all the fees incurred by the companies operating cost and taxes and upper management bonuses and profits with nothing passed down to us who supply the reason they exist. All companies have went this route and continue the cut the hands that feed them. Customers do have a voice..... Your money. Take it elsewhere when you are not satisfied with service. Any company whom isn't providing adequate service should feel that pinch. But we see large entities conspiring together to lock in high cost by raising it across the board. It's basically picking which pineapple you prefer to crammed in our backside. Given less products and service for higher rates has been the trend since 2008 and looks to continue until there is nothing left to take from the consumer.

Restructuring Cost-Center environment: Where used CC in customizing entries

Hi
My company needs to restructure CC environment, by replacing all many existing Cost-Center with new ones.
I need to evalaute the impact of this change, and I need to understand where a Cost-Center is used both in OBJECTS (Assets, Tarifs, CO-Routings, Order settle rules etc.) and CUSTOMIZING.
For Objects I can run where-used tool from KS02 transaction, but I don't know is there a Where-Used tool for Customizing entry too.
Does Anybody knows if there is this tool in SAP ???
Thank for your reply.
Claudio

Hi,
There is no comprehensive tool for this task. You have to check the customizing either via activities or directly in the tables if you are familiar with them.
Regards,
Eli

Error while posting a write up for asset belonging to affiliated company

Hi,
I am facing an error while posting a write up for an asset which belong to an affiliated company. Error is
Transaction type 790 not possible (posting to affiliated company)
Message no. AA390
I am using Transaction type 711 which is linked to 790 in custo. Kinldy let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Pragya

Hi
According to this note for document type used, we should not select the 'inter company posting' or 'enter trading partner indicator'
but as i m doing writeup for asset belonging to affiliated company, so i need to set this indicator. the document type used is standard AA
Is there any other way, to resolve the issue
Thanks
Pragya

Company restructuring

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for