Compare COPA SD FI

Hello everyone,
I am trying to understand KEAT.
In this billing number, I can see various kind of cost like below :
Var.Product. Costs                       USD    4,130.39
IFRS Standard COGS                   USD    8,900.77
Var Material Cost                          USD    2,277.88
Fixed Labor Cost                          USD          2.35
Var Labor Cost                             USD          8.55
Fixed Overhead Cost                    USD    2,843.73
Var Overhead Cost                       USD    1,843.96
Fixed Material OH Cost                USD         74.55
Cost of goods (through VPRS cond)  USD     7,050.94
1 May I know if part of the cost above made up of Cost of goods (through VPRS)? If yes, what tcode I can see?
2 What tcode that determines this billing to have what cost involved and the cost amount?
3 May I know if IFRS Standard COGS is standard and Cost of goods (through VPRS) is actual?
4 Which tcode I can see what are the cost that made up IFRS Standard COGS and Cost of goods (through VPRS condition)?
Thank you so much.
Regards

You are seeing two costs in COPA. One the standard cost of the material, picked through the condition type VPRS. which is USD 7,050.94 and the IFRS cost of USD 8,900.77. Both are standards per different accounting standards. The IFRS perhaps does not include the variable overhead cost while deriving the cost.
The cost component comprising of fixed cost 2920.63 and variable cost of 4130.39 is being flown into COPA through settings in t-code KE4R.
Fixed Labor Cost      2.35     
Fixed Material OH Cost       74.55     
Fixed Overhead Cost      2,843.73     
Var Labor Cost       8.55     
Var Material Cost       2,277.88     
Var Overhead Cost       1,843.96     
Total of components     7,051.02     
The cost component can be seen, by going to MM03 of the material and plant (Costing view). Double click on the standard cost to see the breakdown of cost component layout.
KE4I determines the flow of VPRS condition type values to flow in COPA.  Walk through the valuation under Master data  of Profitability Analysis in IMG.

Similar Messages

  • Importing star ratings from Canon's ImageBrowser

    Does anyone know how to import star ratings assigned to photos
    using Canon's ImageBrowser (5.8.0.10) software into Aperture?
    I've tried importing a few photos with various ratings into Aperture 2.1 trial
    but they appear unrated in Aperture. (Neither iPhoto nor Adobe Bridge
    recognized the ratings either.)
    I've done some investigation, comparing copies of the same image
    with different star settings, and it appears ImageBrowser is recording
    its rating in a 'WheR' resource in the resource fork of the image file.
    Thanks

    I started using ImageBrowser in 2001 (probably under OS 8.5), was underwhelmed with iPhoto's stability when it was introduced, so since I recently got a new Intel mac, I decided to investigate migrating my library of 20K photos to Aperture.

  • Comparative Report in COPA

    Hi All
    We have cost based copa active. I want to develop report in co-pa where i want to plot profitability of varies Sales Offices for specific period for specific material. Example
    Selection criteria
    Material
    Region
    Sales Office from
    Sales Office To
    From Period
    To Period
    In Detail Report Layout
    Material
    Sales Office    Period                      Value fields1.......Value fieldn        Profit
    AA                  012008 to 022008      rev  cost components  Fixed cost  Profit
    BB
    CC
    Regards
    Sanjay Petkar

    Hi,
    There is no record type associated with transferring condition values whether MM or SD.
    Billing data from SD is identified with record type 'F'.
    Data from FI/MM is identified with record type 'B'.
    Usually, price differences arising in invoice verification/MM are posted to CO-PA.
    This is what SAP help has to say about transferring MM conditions to COPA:
    It is also possible to transfer conditions from MM to update billing data in pooled payment in the IS Retail system. These are transferred according to the same rules as SD conditions.
    Do you fall under this category? Well, I've not used this functionality - not sure how you can bring cost break up of raw-material to CO-PA with this function.
    As per you, what exactly will be the triggering point to transfer this MM conditions to CO-PA? At the time posting of MM invoice (MIRO)?
    Hope this helps.
    Edited by: Pradeep kumar Athmakur on Jan 7, 2010 10:34 PM

  • Production Variances of semifinished goods in COPA

    Hi,
    We are using Costing based COPA, which is updated at the time of billing.
    The production variances are posted to COPA when the settlement of the production orders are done.
    The production variances if brought within the purview of COPA report (based on sales), the plan vs actuals can be compared. However, in case of actuals, the production variances would appear only to the extent of tha particular product sold (that too, to the extent of qty produced and not qty sold)..
    I have two issues:
    1. Whether system can explode the BOM and bring in the production variances of semi-finished goods into the total production variances, if I drill down only on the Finished product sold. The total actual cost would include the variances of relevant SFG also. Is this possible, if so how?
    2. Whether, by bringing production qty and sales qty, the proportionate prod variances be calculated (total prod var * sales qty / prod qty). This can surely be done by inserting formulae. But is this justified from business point of view?
    Please help me resolving this issue..
    Edited by: Swapvik on Mar 17, 2009 7:11 AM

    Hi Swapvik,
    Issue No.1:
    When you are using only Standard Costing in CO-PC, variances will not get rolled-up to the next level. Only costs get rolled-up. As per your requirement, when you see the report in COPA, when you see the details of FG and you want to see the variances of it's SFG also, this would be possible only if you have activated Material Ledger. If ML is active, variances also get rolled-up along with costs.
    Issue No.2:
    The ultimate purpose of bringing Variances into COPA and making part of them in a report is to consider COGM subject to the variances. Though it is not 100% justified, it gives you the most appropriate analysis compared to where you don't consier the variances at all. If you don't consider variances there, that means, you are considering only COGM and not taking the effect of variances, which will definitely not a correct picture of Profitability.
    Pls revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • COPA vs New GL

    I am looking for feedback regarding reporting, as we are trying to finalize our reporting design. 
    I am working with a SAP shop that uses COPA and FICO in R/3 (4.6C release) and BW3.5 and are upgrading to ECC and BI 7. As part of their project we have a desire to gain the ability to do ad-hoc analysis on "business line".
    They have 3 business lines - A, B, and C. 
    Right now the project does not intend to have a "business line" field in the New GL and does not intend to use the New GL segment field.
    As I am working with the reporting team, I have been involved with discussions about FI/CO reporting. In such discussions we address how we will be able to do this "business line" ad-hoc analysis.
    As a result of these discussions, we have addressed two topics: (1) we will be able to do this analysis in COPA but for contribution margin only and (2) we will have different accounts in FI for this kind of analysis i.e. different revenue accounts for business lines A, B, and C different cost of goods sold accounts for business lines A, B, and C  etc.
    I see limitations for ad-hoc analysis based on the current intention not to have a "business line" field in the New GL and not to use the "segment" field of the New GL.  As I see it, we can either do data transformation in BI (which I believe we should keep to a minimum), do jump queries from New GL queries to COPA queries, or filter New GL queries by groups of accounts.
    For example, one view of the accounts is a hierarchy as follows
    Revenue
        Revenue Line A
        Revenue Line B
        Revenue Line C
    COGS
        COGS Line A
        COGS Line B
        COGS Line C
    etc.
    ...and another hierarchy
    Line A
         Revenue Line A
         COGS Line A
         etc
    Line B
         Revenue Line B
         COGS Line B
         etc
    Line C
         Revenue Line C
         COGS Line C
         etc
    Thus we would be able to filter by business line without having a business line or segment field.
    I have proposed using either a custom field for "business line" in the New GL or using the segment field in the New GL.
    I have chosen to prototype with a custom field.  In the prototype, this custom field is populated via an FI substitution which reads the FI field for profitability segment, goes to the COPA table which stores the profitability segment definition, and reads the definition in order to do the FI substitution for the custom field.
    I am now working on the FI substitution approach for the business line field when the posting happens for the delivery (posting COGS to FI).
    Have any of you tried such an approach or similar approach?  Look forward to hearing any feedback anyone may have.

    Comparing CO-PA and the New GL is like comparing apples and pears.
    They perform different types of reporting.
    If you are going to use BI7, I would recommend that the majority of reporting is performed there.
    If you have CO-PA currently, I presume you have the correct level of characteristics to move forward.
    The new GL, via document splitting will allow you to run balancing balance sheets, by profit centers. This could add value to your organisation.
    It sounds to me that the answers will come out of workshops.
    You need to starting a reporting business stream project, where all levels of users provide a wish list for the types of reports they require.
    From there your team of Finance Consultants and BI Consultants should be able to advise where the reports should sit, CO-PA, New GL, or BI
    It may be worth bringing in a Specialist Consultancy to help you with the design phase.

  • Creation of new COPA by copying previous Company code config

    Hi Guys:
    We have copied new COPA configuration for new company code with reference to already existing company code's config.
    I could not able to see Actual Flow of values by comparing different screens between old and new config. New config is not having flow of actual's data.
    Could someone guide me with verfication procedure to see why it has not transfferred a full config to new thing.
    Please advice.
    Thanks
    Sri

    Hi
    It is not clear what you copied for COPA configuration
    Please check whether the new co code is assigned to the same controlling area as the old ones.
    S Jayaram

  • Problem in COPA re-initialization - Kishore Seereddi

    Hi Kishore or other Gurus,
                   I have an issue on my COPA values. KE24 doesn't reconciled with the values on my COPA cube. My initial conclusion is that some of the records created on October 2, 2008 and posting date on September 30, 2008.
                   Is there an issue with the creation and posting date? or is there an issue on reinit because there is a reinitialization happen on October 2, 2008. I am not the one who do the reinitialization I am just supporting the issue.
                  I mentioned Kishore here because I read on the thread below that he mentioned that we need to run the delta load up to 3 times the delta load retrieved only 0 records before doing init without data transfer and full repair. What is the reason behind these?
    Re: COPA Enhancement and Reinit of Delta
                 I asked because the guy who re-init the data delete the records of the cube and then just do init without data transfer and then full repair.
                 Then the data where not synched between KE24 and COPA. The datasources is 1_COPA****.
                 Hope you can help me asap. I will assign points asap too.
    Thanks and regards,
    Raymond
    Edited by: Raymond Dela Cruz on Oct 27, 2008 11:20 AM

    Hi,
    As i understood that the Delta need to be loaded for 1 or more time in case of LO dataextraction, by doing so we clear the delta queue in LBWQ T-code. so this will not cause problem duplication of records in our next delta extraction.
    For the CO-PA and FI the extraction method is different in compare to LO extraction. so there is no need to do the delta extraction before reinit of data.
    Please check your filters in KE24 and BW are same during reconciliation. Because selection filters are important in COPA.
    If you are looking for sales information, in KE24 check the corresponding invoice numbers created on date of intrest are available in COPA infocubes. this is one of the method.
    Regards,
    Vishwa.
    Edited by: Vishwanath H.E on Oct 28, 2008 12:55 PM

  • I have iphoto 7. I need to order additional copies of a wedding album. When I try, it tells me that I can no longer order on iphoto 7 and I need to upgrade. When I try to upgrade, it tells me tat I can't upgrade because I have OSX 10.6.8  What can I do

    I have iphoto7. I need to order additional copies of a wedding album I creared LESS THAT A YEAR AGO!!!. Apperently I can no longer order on iphoto 7 and cannot download the upgrade on my OSX 10.6.8 system What can I do?

    Your profile signature is confusing. There it says "iPhoto '08, OS X Mountain Lion (10.8)".  But your question mentions older systems:  " iphoto 7 and cannot download the upgrade on my OSX 10.6.8 system"
    Do you have two different Macs? If you have a second mac with OS X Mountain Lion (10.8), you could upgrade that to MAvericks and buy the most recent iPhoto '11, version 9.5.1 from the App Store. That would be the least expensive solution to upgrade your iPhoto.
    If you only have iPhoto 7 on OSX 10.6.8, you can can buy the boxed iLife '11 installer package from Amazon. This will install an early version of iPhoto '11, that runs well with your current system and will let you print your book.  You will need to run the iPhoto library upgrader to convert your old library, see:  iPhoto '11: About the Library Upgrader
    Also, you  should be aware, that upgrading your library may change the book layout a bit, because the themes have changed between the versions, so you need to keep a backup copy of the library and iPhoto 7, to be able to compare the upgraded version to the original.
    -- Léonie

  • Can anyone help me?Creating the shadow copies in the file server cluster ,there are some errors occured, OS version is WSS 2012

    I construct a failover cluster(file server,AP module) for sharing files by WSS 2012,and I want to use the shadow copies to backup my data,but when making  a shadow copies on the volume which  is added to the cluster(not the CSV,just add
    it to the cluster and use it to share files,it plays the role of file server),there are some errors occured, these errors result in the shadow copies failed,error likes the following pictures:
    1: the disk F is added to the cluster,first I make the shadow copies by click the right key of mouse on the disk F,and chouse the configeration shadow copies,and click the settings, then click the schedule , and I wait just a few seconds, the error is appeared,like
    this picture 1, the wait operation timed out,and then ,
    I click the schedule button once again,a different error occured,like the following picture," the object already exists",if i don't set the schedule at first ,use the default shedule,and click the enable button also the same  error must 
    accure
    but the only diffrence is that, a shadow copy time point is created, also ,you can make the shadow copies by click " create now", that is creating the shadow copies manually. Although it can succesfully make the shadow copies, but when I select
    a time point to revert, error  occured, "A volume that contains operating system files or resides on a cluster shared disk cannot be reverted" 
    In a word,all the errors above make the shadow copies by schedulling failed,except making the shadow copies manually,but what makes me confused is that I have ever maked the shadow copies succesfully by schedul a policy,I don't know what makes it succesful,
    it's small probability, most of time ,it's failed.No matter what kind of situation, revert must be failed.
    I'm sorry for my pool english , it's the first time for me getting help in forum by english ,I don't know if I descripe my question clearly, also ,other method like the link
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc784118(v=ws.10).aspx I have tried,but the same errors occured.Can anyone tell me How can I make the shadow copies in File Server
    cluster(AP module)?And I make a mistake in operating? Looking forward for your reply.Thanks!

    Hi,
    Please check the following 2 places:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Cluster\Tasks
    C:\Windows\System32\Tasks
    First please compare permission settings of the folder C:\Windows\System32\Tasks with a working computer. Correct permission settings if anything wrong. Specifically, confirm you current account do have permission on this folder.
    As it said "object already exists", find the schedules you created before, backup and delete all these schedules in both registry key and folder.
    Then test to create a new schedule to see if issue still exists.
    Meanwhile what kind of storage device you are using? The issue could occur on specific storage device, so test to enable shadow copy on a local disk to see if that will work.
    TechNet Subscriber Support in forum |If you have any feedback on our support, please contact [email protected]
    Thank you for you reply.On the local volume,all of these errors will not occur, but the volume in the file server cluser.There is no value in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Cluster\Tasks. On local volume, everything goes well about the shadow copy, so I do not
    think something is wrong about the permission settings of the folder C:\Windows\System32\Tasks.Storage device  is a SAN,we use RAID6 and provide the LUNs to the NAS engine, and the make the volume on these LUNs, Is Angthing wrong? Hope for you
    reply~~

  • Seeking Information on Company Code Currency in COPA

    Greetings all,
    I am working on a project to activate the company code currency flag in COPA (attributes under KEA0). I have activated the flag in a test system and as expected I now get two PA docs, a 10 and a B0. The oddity begins when I compare PA docs created from SD and FI. In my example I am creating documents in three different currencies; 1) transaction curr = SEK, 2) company curr = EUR, and 3) operating concern curr = USD. I am on ECC 6.0 EP 4.
    If I create a PA from a billing document (record type F) then the data looks exactly as I expect it. The foreign currency key (FRWAE) is SEK. I can see the transaction currency is SEK with value fields in SEK, I can see the company currency is EUR with an exchange rate of SEK <-> EUR along with value fields in EUR, and I can see the operating concern currency is USD with an exchange rate of SEK <-> USD along with value fields in USD.
    However, if I create a similar document with FB50 (record type B) the foreign currency key (FRWAE) is EUR instead of SEK and the exchange rate to USD is 1 (KURSF) instead of the actual exchange rate. I only get company currency and operating concern currency values. The values in the value fields are correct per currencies eventhough the fx rate is whacked. In FI the transaction currency is SEK but you would never know it in PA. The really bizarre thing is when I go to display the PA doc (I am branching from the FI doc) it behaves very odd. The default view is Op conc which is in USD. If I click the foreign curr button it displays USD. If I click the company code curr button it displays EUR. If I then go back to the foreign curr view it is now in EUR???
    I am hoping someone can explain the difference between the two, or at least point me to a good resource. If there is a rational reason for this system behavior then I am hoping someone can suggest some way to manipulate the data.
    Many thanks,
    Chris

    Hi,
    CO-PA will only store values in either operating concern currency or company code currency(if active). For FI postings CO-PA fills the field foreign currency in the CO-PA line item with the currency with the currency of the company code. The reason for this is that the currency conversion for FI documents is that the currency conversion for FI documents is executed with the
    company code currency and the field FRWAE is always filled with the currency that is used for conversion. This is designed in order to allow a reconciliation between FI and CO-PA. CO-PA uses company code currency as the base to convert to operating
    concern currency for FI postings. The field FRWAE is not intended to reflect the transaction currency. It is just used to store the currency from which the conversion to the currency of the record is made.
    In case of direct postings from FI/MM CO-PA takes over group currency directly if group and operating concern currency are identical. As group currency is translated in FI with exchange rate ( according the settings in transaction 'OB22' for company code) you'll find this exchange rate in CO-PA too. I have attached SAP Note 604936 to this ticket that describes the translation logic used in PA for postings from FI and MM.
    The currency translation from SD however works differently as described in SAP Note 429517. In this case PA will not consider any values in group currency. Values in operating concern currency are either translated based on transaction or company code currency using exchange rate type 'M'.
    Hope this will help.
    Best regards, Takashi
    Edited by: Takashi Kotani on Mar 6, 2010 2:24 AM

  • COPA report & G/L balance misatched

    Dear Experts,
    Will u pls explain me when i see G/L balance of Domestic Sales(G/l number 500000) it come  200050.If i check it through COPA report in same period/year,distribution channel of Domestic sale it shows  me different figure.In the COPA repot in top list item when i check FI documents one by one some documents are missing.Pls suggest me how i got correct data in the COPA report and why the  documents not seen in COPA reprt.Pls suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Debashis

    Hi
    FI - COPA reconciliation is always a tedious task and time consuming.
    Download COPA line item data from KE24 and FI balance from FBL3n and compare the balances by record type.
    1. Make sure cost element category for your sales GL 500000 is either set to 11 or 12.
    2. Check the record type of COPA documents posted in KE24.
    3. If the record type is F which comes thru SD/Billing module, check and make sure the FI Balance matches with COPA for this record type. You need to get the FI balance for this record type either by user/Job name or by different doc type.
    4. Check if there is any direct FI-PA transfer structure is activated for this GL and if any user posted FI entry with manual entry of characteristics, where by some of the characteristics are not input correct/blank. This is higly prone transaction for FI - COPA reconciliation issue.
    5. Check if there is any direct COPA entry posting made thru transaction KE21N. This will result in more/less balance in COPA than in FI.
    6. Check if any copa entries are transferred thru external system, and few important characteristics not derived properly.
    7. Check KEDR derivations are set properly
    8. Check if any other cost element area are allocated to this cost element in Controlling Allocations/distributions/assesments.
    9. Last but not the least, check if the COPA report you are checking is able to identify the correct characteristics. If not amend the report based on the data poste.
    Regards,
    Sekhar

  • Display COPA line item report-KE24

    Hi Experts,
    Do we get the correct COPA line items by using the standard transaction code KE24. Is this report is useful to compare the values of the report KE30 which we define.
    Please clarify.
    Regards,
    Ram

    Hi All
    I had created sales order( MTO).
    Sales Order No 61224069 u2013 50
    Sales Order line item 40 created > PR & PO created (MD02) > MIGO > Delivery of Order (VL01N) > Settlement (VA88) >Billing( VF01) > Settlement (VA88).
    I have two COPA Document and Material Price updating 2 Time in COPA report.
    Please let me know Its Process error Or Configuration error.
    If Process --  Please let me know the correct process
    If Config    --  Please let me know where to check
    Thanks In Advance.

  • Values are not flow to COPA

    Can you please clear some point.-
    1.According to my understanding, From SD data will flow through condition type,which is assign with value field and condition types are assign with Pricing Procedure.
    In my problem, Condition type-YREC(Packing tax) is in Pricing Procedure and YREC assign with value field VV031 but amount is not flow to COPA.
    2.Please tell me the FI flow to COPA
    Please help me.

    <b>Pl try KE4ST billing transfer simulation</b>
    Simulate Billing Document Transfer
    In the activity "Simulating the Transfer of Documents from Billing", you have the option of simulating the transfer of billing document data into Profitability Analysis.
    Simulation occurs on the basis of the Customizing settings valid at the time it is carried out. You can view the characteristics and value fields of the line item to be written to COPA.
    The function "Valuation analysis" allows you to perform an analysis of the valuation strategy valid for valuating billing document data.
    You can also restart the simulation of document transfers for billing documents that have already been transferred. This option should simplify in particular the analysis of error situations that have arisen.
    Performing this simulation causes no data to be posted to COPA or to other modules.
    <b>Check tcode KEAT also</b>
    Check Value Flow in Billing Document Transfer
    In this activity, you can compare your actual data in Profitability Analysis with the data posted in Financial Accounting (FI). This makes it possible to analyze the flow of values from SD billing documents to CO-PA, find and analyze any differences between the different applications.
    Billing data is stored by condition types in SD, accounts in FI, and value fields in costing-based CO-PA. The reconciliation report yields a list of the balances for value fields, condition types, and profit and loss accounts.

  • Previews in Bridge & Vista -- can't compare .psd files because...

    Vista won't show me a preview and Bridge only opens with one window.
    It's important for me to clean out my backup by making sure that I have the most recent graphic file stored (I have multiple copies of files backed up at different times). I can't do this easily because I can't see .psd previews in Vista, and I can only open Bridge once. Therefore, I can't compare files that are in different locations & on different hard drives next to each other. Does anyone have a solution for this? (btw, I don't think Bridge is that hot of a program -- it's not very flexible and all it does is crash.)
    Camille

    Thanks to all for your suggestions. I reduced Bridge to compact mode & could then open multiple windows. I spent all morning cleaning & organizing my drives! I have a few more questions, though:
    1. When you're looking at the folders in Bridge, all you see is a blank folder. It doesn't show a graphic of what's inside the folder the way that Vista does. Is there a way to get Bridge to do that?
    2. When you're looking at folders in Vista, most graphic file formats generate a view of the image. But if the folder has Photoshop files in it, all you see is a .psd icon. I'm assuming there is no way to generate a view of a .psd file in Vista. But, even when I'm in Photoshop and doing something basic, such as opening a file, I don't get a view of the image (only an icon) unless I actually click on the file, then a view appears in the dialog box. I don't understand why the .psd files don't generate images in the program itself. I thought it might be a setting in my hardware that's not turned on, because this just doesn't make sense to me.
    Thank you.

  • Mac mini running generals painfully slow compared to ibook...

    hi, i have a new mac mini 1.5 solo core with 1gb of ram. Also running it with a 19"monitor. The game seems to run painfully slow when compared to my old ibook with a 1.33ghz processor and 1gb of ram.
    thanks

    Hi
    Unfortunately your report is correct, depending on the game used, which name you don't give : if it's not Universal Binary , the mac runs it through Rosetta (powerpc emulator) resulting in -comparatively- poor performance...That, plus the fact that the ibook doesn't have to cope with shared memory for its graphic card...So in this situation, the theoretical advantage of the new mini on your previous configuration vanishes !

Maybe you are looking for

  • HT5622 Why my Apple ID can not use in Mac App store?

    I have two Apple ID, and i tried both Apple ID. They are both doesn't work. I don't know why.

  • CSS display problem

    I have an unusual problem that must be something to do with my Dreamweaver set-up. All of a sudden all of my sites do not display the CSS in the dreamweaver application. The CSS details all appear and I can select them in the usual way but nothing ap

  • MB90. no accounting document created

    Hi All, How to catch at what part of MB90 the accounting document is created? The requirement is that when I run MB90 in background, I need to catch the material docs who have no corresponding accounting document or does not successfully create accou

  • Can I upgrade to Mountain Lion and to Mavericks?

    I never upgraded any further than Snow Leopard because I thought my MacBook Pro couldn't, I'm now thinking I made a mistake.  I have been reading some of the posts on here and it seems that if the Mac is mid/late 2007 it can be upgraded.  I have foun

  • What can I do to create natural keys for dimension (cwm2, dbms_aw)?

    I create OLAP catalog and AW via cwm2 and dbms_aw packages. Unfortunately made AW uses surrogate keys (that is names of levels are stuck to values of the dimensions, e.g. LEVELNAME_value). Is there any way to change it?