Compensation for FP-RTD-122 rtd

Hi
Iam using FP-RTD-122 with a 3 wire PT100 RTD to measure the TEMP in a Vacuum Chamber. I had got my RTD Calibrated & find that there is a diff of +/- 3 deg w.r.t to my FP-RTD-122 modules.The same RTD when connected to Eurotherm 2408 Temp Controller gives a correct reading. I suspect that there could be some problem in the FP modules, Is there any VI where i can directly write compensation to the modules. Can u plz help me resolve this issue. Cheers Suresh.R

Hello,
If you are seeing this type of offset, it is most likely the result of ESD damage to the FP-RTD-122 module. The good news that you can workaround this problem by hot plugging your modules into your bank as Matthew has mentioned.
Regards,
Bill B
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

Similar Messages

I am using the Order Analysis Toolkit and want to get more information about the compensation for "Reference Signal Processing", which is scarce in the manuals, the website and the examples installed with the toolkit.

I am using the Order Analysis Toolkit and want to get more information about the compensation for "Reference Signal Processing", which is scarce in the manuals, the website and the examples installed with the toolkit.
In particular, I am analyzing the example "Even Angle Reference Signal Processing (Digital Tacho, DAQmx).vi", whose documentation I am reproducing in the following:
DESCRIPTIONS:
This VI demonstrates how to extract even angle reference signals and remove the slow-roll errors. It uses DAQmx VIs to acquire sound or vibration signals and a digital tachometer signal. This VI includes a two-step process: acquire data at low rotational speed to extract even angle reference; use the even angle reference to remove the errors in the vibration signal acquired at normal operation.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Run the VI.
2. On the DAQ Configurations tab, specify the sample rate, samples per channel, device and channel configurations, and tachometer channel information.
NOTE: You need to use DSA PXI-447x/PXI-446x and PXI TIO device in a PXI chassis to run this example. The DSA device must be in slot 2 of the PXI chassis.
3. Switch to Extract Even Angle Reference tab. Specify the number of samples to acquire and the # of revs in reference which determines the number of samples in even angle reference. Click Start to take a one-shot data acquisition of the vibration and tachometer signals. After the acquisition, you can see the extracted even angle references in Even Angle Reference.
4. Switch to the Remove Slow-roll Errors tab. Click Start to acquire data continuously and view the compensate results. Click Stop in this tab to stop the acquisition.
ORDER ANALYSIS VIs USED IN THIS EXAMPLE:
1. SVL Scale Voltage to EU.vi
2. OAT Digital Tacho Process.vi
3. OAT Get Even Angle Reference.vi
4. OAT Convert to Even Angle Signal.vi
5. OAT Compensate Even Angle Signal.vi
My question is: How is the synchronization produced at the time of the compensation ? How is it possible to eliminate the errors in a synchronized fashion with respect to the surface of the shaft bearing in mind that I am acquired data at a low rotation speed in order to get the "even angle reference" and then I use it to remove the errors in the vibration signal acquired at normal operation. In this application both operations are made in different acquisitions, therefore the reference of the correction signal is lost. Is it simply compensated without synchronizing ?
Our application is based on FPGA and we need to clarity those aspects before implementing the procedure.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi CracKatoA.
Take a look at the link bellow:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=255126&requireLogin=False
Regards,
Filipe Silva

Got charged full retail for a new phone instead of Edge Up, wiped out bank account, had to refuse shipment, no compensation for the time spent talking to 14 representatives over the phone in the last week, and still no refund??

On 9/29 I ordered an iPhone 6 Plus 128GB as an edge up from my 5S, swiped my card at the store to pay the Edge Up fee, and was told 10/31 was the expected ship date.
Didn't see the order on my My Verizon account, spoke with 3 representatives on the phone to actually get the order number so I could track it.
On 10/24 the ship date disappeared and I called to find out there was an issue with the payment. I gave them my debit card number over the phone for the Edge Up amount, and they charged me full retail -- OVER $1,000.
They promised it wouldn't post to my account and it wouldn't ship after cancelling the order. Next day it shipped. I called FedEx and refused the package over the phone.
I called when the payment posted the next day, totally wiping out my bank account and charging me overdraft fees.
They said they'd push for a refund immediately -- on Sunday, 10/24. It's now 10/30, I see no refund, I have no phone, and I have over $100 in bank fees from their mistake.
I spoke with a supervisor on the phone and they said they could refund the bank fees, but would do nothing for the fact that they screwed up my order, and told me it would be another 2-3 weeks before they actually ship a phone to me if I ordered today.
Sorry, but that's NOT good customer service. I can buy out my Edge agreement, sell the phone on eBay, and go to another carrier pretty easily. I don't want to leave Verizon's service, but I don't really see how they value me as a customer?
Does anyone else have some idea of what I could do about this whole thing??
TL;DR -- Verizon charged full retail for a phone instead of Edge Up fee, still no refund, no compensation for the inconvenience and stress they caused, and another 2-3 week wait on a phone I ordered a month ago.

That situation went from inconvenient to complicated quickly. Wait for any pending orders to drop off, wait for things to clear up, wait till your upgrade comes up and then upgrade when your contract is fulfilled. I would have suggested a replacement phone, I know, with only a month left why couldn't you just upgrade early, but these situations where people try to upgrade early always end horribly and once a phone order starts, it almost cannot finish until something winds up shipped received and returned. Sorry this happened the way it did. Definitely not efficient.

Compensation for Ipod Touch 2g Users

I have had my iPod Touch 2G 16GB since the day it came out over 2 years ago. Upon the release of IOS5, I began to wonder, since my iPod can no longer recieve updates past 4.2.1 (due to hardware reasons), can I be compensated for not recieving new updates and thus, being shut out from being able to do / use special applications that require a certain firmware such as iCloud? Also, is it possible to trade in my current iPod for a 4th Generation Touch that is able to receive the new updates? Thanks!

you're asking a user based forum noone who works at apple receives this...
but to answer the questions.
no and no.
sorry.

Claim compensation for Apple's product and service

My iphone 4S can't power up, I send it to depot detection,
It takes me nearly one month, from Jan 27th until now.
I can't use phone for one month, and my data on the phone is gone.
I bought the iphone only for 4 months.
Can I claim compensation?

Yes, Apple did tell me that when I request service, the data is gone.
But did you think about that? how can I do?
Not repair it? It's not my fault that the phone can't power up.
Why should I take responsibility for this?
I was not given a phone to use for nearly one month, the reason is that there's no phone left.
Why can't I claim compensation for my loss?

Compensation for loss of Internet

Do BT offer compensation for loss of your Internet conection if the fault is on their network, if so how many days loss of internet service is the minimum you can claim for, and do you actually have to file a claim or is this done automatically ? tia.

Not for Residential Broadband customers, only Business ones.
You can claim back daily line rental charges. See Customer service guarantee
You would have to prove actual financial loss, but that would only apply to a business, which you are not allowed to operate on a residential broadband line.
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

WLSE Fault: Appeared Up: Compensated for

Hello,
I'm running WLSE 2.13 and I'm having this fault many times in many different APs:
"Appeared Up: Compensated for by 11 radio(s)"
I connect to the AP and there's nothing unusual. What could be happening?

This only happens when self healing has been applied.
And remember that self Healing modifies only the power setting, and not the channel frequency or beacon interval of the neighboring APs.
The indicated radio appeared up or down on this AP, so other radios were modified to maintain coverage.
After self healing has been applied to the other AP, this fault indicates the radio that had the failure.
If self healing is configured to automatically apply changes, then these are the values that were applied. You can select the document with the eyeglasses in the faults page of that particular fault. A list of radios with the old and new power settings is displayed. These radios can compensate for the downed or recovered radio.
Check out this doc for more info: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/cscowork/ps3915/products_user_guide_chapter09186a008052dba5.html

Reason code required for movement type 122

I am getting the above error and looked up a thread on the forum which applies to my scenario. However there was a mention of defining a text schema and assigning it to the movemnt type. Can someone help me how to do that?
Jai
The thread is as follows:
We are running SRM 550 with Extended Classic scenario. When I attempt to create a return delivery, I get an error message saying: A reason has to be entered for movement type 122. But there is no way to enter the reason, i.e no fields or indicators.
The text schema for return delivery is maintained and assigned to the document type for confirmations - as far as I am aware this is all the config which is necessary to activate the reason for return delivery function. Am I missing something??

Hi Jai
Text Types Menu Path : SPRO -> SAP Implementation Guide → Supplier Relationship Management → SRM Server → Cross- Application Basic Settings -> Text Schema -> Define Text Types
Text Schema: Menu Path : SPRO -> SAP Implementation Guide → Supplier Relationship Management → SRM Server → Cross- Application Basic Settings -> Text Schema -> Define Text Schema
Fixed Values: Menu Path : SPRO ->SAP Implementation Guide → Supplier Relationship Management → SRM Server → Cross- Application Basic Settings -> Text Schema -> Define Fixed Values for Texts
Best regards
Ramki

What Compensation for New Lightroom owners?

I just purchased Lightroom 4 less than 2 weeks ago from Amazon and paid $161.96. Now I see they are offering it for $99.00 with a Photoshop CS5 upgrade. I haven't been able to find anything about any compensation for new users to Lightroom.

I chatted with online help about this situation and he gave me a phone number to call. I called the support line and after 30 minutes of going over everything, giving them the serial number, etc. I was told I could return the software to Amazon and call them, Adobe, and have the serial number deactivated. I tried to get through to her that the software was already installed and Amazon wouldn't be accepting it as a returned. I fianlly just gave up and I'll eat the $61.00. Not worth my time to hassel with this company. I just assumed there would be a proceedure for this since they have policies for time periods when a customer has recently bought Photoshop and a new upgrade comes out. It is still early and they may offer some compensation, as I can't be the only person in this situation.
BTW John Waller, I got no deal on the Lightroom I bought. I believe that was full price. The only reason I even thought about asking for some compensation was I had ordered from Amazon less than 2 weeks ago and had actually only received it about a week ago and had not even had time to register it with Adobe.
Geoff, I intend to upgrade from PSCS5 extended to PSCS6. Thanks for your response.

Compensating for JMS on one machine

 So i'm still coming up to speed on clustering with Weblogic,
 and I have a few questions.
 1) how (if at all) are people compensating for the reliability
 issue raised by running JMS on only one machine in the cluster.
 2) is there a way to make prevent the one machine running JMS
 from performing any tasks normal other than JMS? ie: prevent
 it from accepting EJB requests, JSP request, etc. & have it
 focus only on JMS (arguably to reduce the chances that some
 errant code unrelated to JMS might bring the system down
 thus choking the rest of the cluster)
 3) Does weblogic have plans to make JMS a clustered service?
 thanks,
 jason


Joel,
 Just to clarify... So, by suffixing qnames with unique ids you are
 effectively trying to mimic load-balancing by the clients, since Nodes ids
 are going to be known to the client apriori. Is it correct?
 Thanks
 Daniel Ilkanayev
 [email protected]
 Joel Nylund <[email protected]> wrote in message
 news:[email protected]...
 > Hey Jason,
 >
 > some people from weblogic in the past have recomended putting all your
 > q's in one of the boxes on the cluster. I dont think this is a good idea
 > since you loose one of the benefits of clustering when you do this
 > (fault tolerance).
 >
 > One idea I have used is to put the same queues in each server. If one
 > server goes down, the messages will be left on the queue (if they are
 > persistent). If you couldnt get the server back up in a reasonable
 > amount of time you could always point another server or process at those
 > q's and consume them. One problem I have had with this approach is that
 > even though weblogic claims jms is not a clustered service, they have
 > compiled their stubs with replication on (at least in 4.5.1 sp7). This
 > causes problems if you use the same jndi name for q's. You will see the
 > conflit handler go nuts if you have 2 servers with the same q name. We
 > have worked around the problem by suffixing our qnames with uniqe ids, I
 > think this will work (going to test tonight).
 >
 > If anyone else has any better ideas for using jms in a enterprise system
 > with fault tolerance and load balancing, please let me know.
 >
 > -Joel
 >
 >
 >
 > Jason Mellein wrote:
 >
 > > So i'm still coming up to speed on clustering with Weblogic,
 > > and I have a few questions.
 > >
 > > 1) how (if at all) are people compensating for the reliability
 > > issue raised by running JMS on only one machine in the cluster.
 > >
 > > 2) is there a way to make prevent the one machine running JMS
 > > from performing any tasks normal other than JMS? ie: prevent
 > > it from accepting EJB requests, JSP request, etc. & have it
 > > focus only on JMS (arguably to reduce the chances that some
 > > errant code unrelated to JMS might bring the system down
 > > thus choking the rest of the cluster)
 > >
 > > 3) Does weblogic have plans to make JMS a clustered service?
 > >
 > > thanks,
 > >
 > > jason
 >

Any compensation for new buyers?

I was ready to buy an iMac after Leopard came out. However, it has been delayed until October after being scheduled for the Spring. I hate to wait, but I also hate to pay rather quickly for an upgrade. So will Apple do any kind of compensation for new buyers?

I don't think I can see your point. They will roll out the new OS when it's really ready (at least we should all hope so). If you've been using any particular product for a while, you should realize that the manufacturer can't guarantee when they will have a viable new product. I get your frustration and the fact that you don't want to put out good money for a product that will be better in a couple weeks, months, or maybe even days. The fact is, Apple will hopefully put out a new OS when it is ready, and there's no way they can know it's ready until it's ready.
I harassed the guy who sold me my first computer with the same sort of reasoning. He responded by saying that there's always a new product around the corner. Looking back, he wanted to sell something that day, but he was also telling the truth.
Bottom line:
Nobody can predict when the next OS will be released. Sure, folks who are developing the next release and reporting to the head honchos will have a better idea than most, but, the head honchos are just paying the guys that write the code who can't say when they will be done.
You want to buy a new computer, buy one. You want the latest and greatest hardware/software, you're just going to have to pay. Even if you buy a Mac tomorrow and get a free 10.5 upgrade 4 months from now, there will be a better mac to run it on.
I understand your question/complaint, but the testing of new technology does not bear out an answer you will want to hear. We don't want Apple to put out an OS that's not ready just because they said it should be reasy on a particular date.

Compensation for OS X Mavericks if I purchase Mountain Lion now?

I am forced to upgrade to Mac OS X Mountain Lion so I can use Adobe products and download my Canon software, I know they are releasing Mac OS X Mavericks soon, is there some kind of compensation since I am purchasing it within the same few months? It seems a bit ridiculous to have to pay for a new one when it is being released in September, but I have no choice since none of my programs will run without an upgrade!

Allan Eckert wrote:
It is generally only after the announcement that they say who will get the discount. I don't think you will qualify if you purchase it now.
I also think that in the past, the discount has applied to new Mac computer purchases, as opposed to new OS X purchases.
RalphLandry1 wrote:
Apple has held the Mac OS X pretty fixed at $20 US for three generations so one would expect that to continue.
Thought that Lion was $30 . Anyway, at the very least it's been a downward trend. I don't see that changing.

No compensation for BT fault and loss of service??...

Hi All,
I have been with BT for years and years now and to be honest havent had that many problems with them.....except now!
Friday 15th June 2012 I called home from my mobile to be greeted with the message that the line was in use and could try later (something along those lines). I immediatly knew something was wrong as no one was at home to be on the phone. I continued to try to ring home through the afternoon to be greeted with the same message. When I arrived home that evening I tried to call the line again from my mobile whilst standing in front of the phone to get the same message. When I picked the phone up, there was a dead tone, no dial tone nothing. My first thought was that the phone, which had now started to have seen better days, was in need of being replaced. Unfortunatly as I didnt get paid for another week I had no option but to wait until I could buy a new handset, luckily I had my mobile for emergencies. On 26th June, I brought a new handset through the BT shop. When it arrived the next day I charged it for a bit then plugged it in...nothing!. Still no dial tone or working handset. I called BT faults dept to report the phone. The man went through the basics with me and was adamant there was no fault showing on the line check. After me having to advise I have done all the checks AND brought a new handset did he agree to send an engineer round to the house. This was only after telling me that if the fault did lay with me I would br charged £99. The engineer was booked for Saturday 30th June. The engineer came (out of his time slot) and wow what a miserable engineer he was. As I have not long paid to have my house re carpeted, I advised him that he would either have to remove his work boots or put the blue overalls over the soles. He had a good old moan about it before he went and changed his work boots to slip on shoes to remove when entering the house again. I advised the engineer what was the query and he tested the box on the wall. He advised that the line was showing as working fine and it was strange that I had no telephone service but I had working internet. He then did some other stuff and told me the line fault was was at the exchange and would need a specialist engineer to look at it. He said he would go and have a look at the green cab across the road and contact me on my mobile to let me know what was happening. I never did receive a call so waited in for an hour not knowing if I should leave the house or not.
After looking at the fault tracking online on the Monday it stated the fault should have been resolved on Saturday 30th. This clearly was the case. Through the week, it took me 6 phone calls to find out what was happening re my line and when it would be working. I was advised by a manager that she was looking after the query and she would be updating me through the time the line was not in service........never did I get 1 call to advise me what was going on.
Eventually on Thursday 5th July the phone was fixed and I was able to use it again. On Thursday evening, I called BT faults line to find out about compensation as I had been out of service for nearly 3 weeks. The man on the line advised that he would refund me back the cost of the line rental as compensation. I advised that this would not be acceptable as I should be refunded that anyway for loss of the line not working, Im not paying for something I cant use. I said I wasnt happy and wanted to speak to a manager. The man went away and got his manager who advised that the most he could offer as compensation was £10. I told him that I found that a joke as for 3 weeks I had had no service, had purchased a new phone, used my mobile and used my time to chase up a fault. I declined the offer of £10 and said I would contact Head Office. On Friday 6th July 2012 I emailed the high level complaints team and as of today have had no response.......Im absolutly disgusted at this. I would like for someone to look into this matter and contact me back as a matter of urgency in regards to a sensible offer of compensation.
I look forward to hearing from someone soon!
Kind Regards
Michelle McCabe

Welcome to this forum. This is a BT domestic customer to customer help forum, any messages posted here do not go to BT.
If you need to contact BT, you can use Live Chat or Contact BT ,or telephone 0800 800 150
The compensation terms are at this link
Customer service guarantee
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

Black Point Compensation for JPEG export?

Hiya,
I'd like to print photos via the web, and therefore want to export the photos as JPEGs. I just checked the options in the export preset panel, and realised that one can select "Black Point Compensation" as an option for the export.
Does anyone have any experience with this setting? Should one use it, if one doesn't know the printer in use?
Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Regards,
Stephan

Stephan,
I'd like to print photos via the web, and therefore
want to export the photos as JPEGs. I just checked
the options in the export preset panel, and realised
that one can select "Black Point Compensation" as an
option for the export.
Does anyone have any experience with this setting?
It's a fairly reliable fix if your test prints come back with murky shadows.
Should one use it, if one doesn't know the printer in
use?
I don't know of a good way to optimize files for unknown printers. I'd recommend getting a profile for the printer/paper combo used by your lab and soft-proofing on your Mac. Have you calibrated your screen, etc.?
The soft proof will get you in the ballpark. Definitely order small (8x10 or so) test print before laying out long green for a poster-sized one.
Cheers,
Andreas

Black point compensation for onscreen proofing

Hi there,
In Aperture, is there any way to turn Black point compensation on for onscreen proofing (i.e. not using the export procedure, where this actually is available)? This option is available in Photoshop, for example.

Stephan,
I'd like to print photos via the web, and therefore
want to export the photos as JPEGs. I just checked
the options in the export preset panel, and realised
that one can select "Black Point Compensation" as an
option for the export.
Does anyone have any experience with this setting?
It's a fairly reliable fix if your test prints come back with murky shadows.
Should one use it, if one doesn't know the printer in
use?
I don't know of a good way to optimize files for unknown printers. I'd recommend getting a profile for the printer/paper combo used by your lab and soft-proofing on your Mac. Have you calibrated your screen, etc.?
The soft proof will get you in the ballpark. Definitely order small (8x10 or so) test print before laying out long green for a poster-sized one.
Cheers,
Andreas

Compensation for FP-RTD-122 rtd

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for