Complex PO ; Work Confirmation

Hi ,
I am modelling a solution for client, where they want that if work confirmation is not approved, Invoices entered against the PO, should go on hold, either etered through isupplier portal or through Payables module.
The Invoice that I am entering is not going on any hold.
The PO is setup with Complex Po style , PO Line set with 3 way match and Invoice match option set to PO> ?
Am I doing anything wrong >
Please help.
Thanks
Hardik Shah

Hi Vadim,
We are running on SRM 4.0 and the Classic scenario.
Is it that the Std WF for confirmation works only if the GR is done in SRM????
Also,if we implement the Alert Management for the Confirmation WF,then how do i ensure/what settings will be required so that only after confirmation by the Requestor in SRM,the invoice is created in the Backend?? Becaue ,I went through the Documentaion for Alert Mgmt hcih says that,
" The following are not incorporated in Alert Management:
Feedback to the triggering application. It is possible to model feedback to the application, such as confirming that a subsequent activity has been executed, using SAP Business Workflow. " which was actualy a bit confusing!
We are not able to analyse which workaround will meet our requirements exactly?Can you suggest something for this???
Thanks n regards,
Disha.

Similar Messages

Complex workflow for confirmation

Hi All,
We are running on SRM 5.0....We are implementing the Classic Scenario.....wherein once the SC is created in SRM ..the follow on docs...starting with Pur Req...are created in the Backend.
Also in the confirmation process,i need to do a two level approval workflow where the Goods Receipt(MIGO) will be done in R/3(Event for WF) and once this is done in Backend,a mail should go to the requestor in SRM who will then do the 2nd level approval.
Can anyone please tell me if any std WF can be used for this???? Also any suggestions on licensing???
Regards,
Disha.

Hi Vadim,
We are running on SRM 4.0 and the Classic scenario.
Is it that the Std WF for confirmation works only if the GR is done in SRM????
Also,if we implement the Alert Management for the Confirmation WF,then how do i ensure/what settings will be required so that only after confirmation by the Requestor in SRM,the invoice is created in the Backend?? Becaue ,I went through the Documentaion for Alert Mgmt hcih says that,
" The following are not incorporated in Alert Management:
Feedback to the triggering application. It is possible to model feedback to the application, such as confirming that a subsequent activity has been executed, using SAP Business Workflow. " which was actualy a bit confusing!
We are not able to analyse which workaround will meet our requirements exactly?Can you suggest something for this???
Thanks n regards,
Disha.

Re-Work confirmation through co11n

Dear Experts,
I have created a production order of 5 quantity. Assign a reference operation set in routing. Selected the option to create to re-work order during pcnf status of order.
Now for first time i have entered 1 quantity in each field of confirmation i.e yield and re-work. So a order is created for re-work order with quantity of 1.
Now again i have done the same thing but this time 1 quantity is confirmed but no re-work order is generated. And i am not able to see that 1 quantity. where it is.
Again i have entered the 1 quantity in re-work field of confirmation and nothing in yield field but again i am not able see to that 1 quantity. After this if i want to confirm than a warning message comes that confirmed quantity is greater than order quantity.
So i want to know that should i enter only one time re-work quantity. If you enter more than one time than sap will not considered it.
Regards,
Saurabh Kumar

HI
You need to configure the In process Rework through Trigger point to achieve the same.
Check this link:
202 &ndash; Rework Processing (Work-in-Process)
Regards,
Anupam Sharma

Confirm Receipt Workflow for Complex PO

Hello,
On R12.1.3 Oracle has stopped Confirm Receipt workflow for Complex PO Ref# Confirm Receipt Workflow Sents Notification To The Buyers For Complex Purchase Orders (Doc ID 1532652.1).
We would like to get this notification (yes, it needs change of text and links).
Is there any replacement notification for pending "work confirmation" that can be used in place of "Confirm Receipt".
Regards,
SaM

Hi
In stndard sap it is not possible.It might be done by changing the recipient in the workflow. So consult a workflow person for this.
Regards
Prasad

Unable to receive Buyer Work Centre Complex PO

Dear All,
I created Complex PO through Buyer Work Centre and approved it but when i go to receive this PO system not found the PO, even i select the same organization. Kindly help me regarding this issue.
Regards,

user12217438 wrote:
ok so how can i create invoice and match with this PO
Regards,Hi,
There are two options.
1. Run the Receiving Transaction Processor once the work confirmation is created which will create a receipt. Then you create invoice manually and match accordingly.
2. If you are using RCTI, then the invoice will also be created automatically along with the receipt.
Thanks,
PS.

Transfer data after Network Confirmation to another Work Center?

Hi all,
let me explain my problem:
I've defined an activity with 3 activity elements(work). Every activity has it's own Work Center.
Normally a worker uses transaction CN25 or CN48N to enter a Network Confirmation by typing in Network, Activity and Element.
After this he types in his Personell Number and the Actual days or hours and confirms it.
If the user takes for example too much days and confirms it, normally i've to correct the Network Confirmation by using transaction CN29 and tell worker to retry his Confirmation. (Because there are only allowed maximum X hours...)
Is it possible to transfer this too much days to another Work Center by using an transaction???
Is it possible to transfer this entry to another Work Center???
Im not a Cost Specialist, please let me note if there are any Threads which discribe the same Problem...
Thanks for any Answer...
Regards,
Tobi D

Hello Virendra,
thanks a lot for your answer.
First of all... There was a mistake in my explanation-it's not I've defined an activity with 3 activity elements(work) it's I've defined a network with 3 activity elements(work).
In our Company every Activity has it's own Work Center. I meant the Identification and view selection in Project Builder (CJ20N) tab Internal --> General Section and here: Work center.
Well, i think my main problem is that i do not know how to correct Network Confirmations without using the delete transaction CN29. For example: Worker confirms on Work Center of Activity A with CN25 oder CN48N, but should confirm on Work Center of Activity B.
Regards,
Tobi D

Logic Pro 8 and Apogee Duet work with Leopard?

Hello There,
I'm new to the boards. This is my first post. So, please forgive me if this has already been discussed.
I have been browsing the boards for about an hour and want to confirm some things I've read. I'm looking to buy a MacBook Pro and Logic Pro 8. Am I correct in reading that Logic Pro 8 doesn't work quite right with Leopard? If so, or "sort of," what other kinds of limitations and things should I be aware of?
Lastly, does Apogee Duet work with Leopard?
Thanks in advance!

Zee, L8 works fine with Leopard. However, different users encounter different bugs/frustration points with the app. I record audio (guitars, bass, etc) and a few software intsruments (drums, keys), usually about 12-20 tracks, in the gypsy jazz/blues/metal idiom, and I'm incredibly happy with the results I've gotten. The problems I've had have more to do with my own ignorance, really, and just stupid oversights -- to be expected from an experienced musician who's nonetheless new to the DAW world -- than any inherent problem with Logic.
But my needs are fairly simple and straightforward, I think; at this point in time I doubt I am using more than say 25% of Logic's advertised capabilities. I'm not using automation, for example, or the Time Machines in the factory; or really complex MIDI work. Were my needs more complex, I might have a different reaction.
Logic is in 8.0.1 release, and I think all will agree there's some things to be polished. But as I said, that probably depends on the user/workflow.
I use an Apogee Duet with L8/Leopard and like it a great deal; I also use Native Instruments' Rig Kontrol 3, which functions brilliantly as an effect pedal/controller with Guitar Rig 3.

Sync Lightroom between two (or more) computers. Why is it so complex?

I am a staunch fan of Lightroom (have 3.4) because of its versatility both for cataloguing and editing. One big minus however is the complexity of working in a networked/multicomputer environment.
Here is what I want: Just sync between a PC and a laptop, in such a way that what I do off-site on my laptop can be easily copied/synced to my PC and vice versa, including settings, collections etc..
My findings/experience thusfar with two options:
NETWORKED
I am aware that the catalogue files cannot/will not work on a network drive (I have Netgear NAS). Using the NAS as a central repository for all image files being addressed by Local catalogues (resp. on my PC and laptop) works but is slow. Could be slow because of a slow Wifi connection between the laptop and NAS, which is normally not the case (I have n-network router..). Because of the often large RAW files I process this is not the preferred route. Since the .lrcat files and lrpreview files won’t work on the NAS, they need to be synced between PC and laptop anyhow. Same for any LR settings that may change during processing.
GO BETWEEN HDD DRIVE
Since I avail of a nippy Diginote 2.5” HDD box filled with a 320 Gb SATA drive with both USB 2.0 and e-SATA I followed Scott Kelby’s advice to use it as a go-between.
I took the following steps:
1.       Copy over all image files, lrcat, lrpreview and Lightroom settings (set in LR preferences to be with catalogue in one folder) from my Laptop data drive Photo folder to the Diginote HDD
         Obviously (was it?) the copied lrcat file (still) pointed to the Laptop datadrive folder so I changed it to point to the Photofolder on the Diginote
2.       I created a new folder with new catalogue, etc. on my PC and imported the lrcat and all files from the Diginote into this new PC catalogue. All well but the LR settings (includes my web gallery settings) were not copied over! Had to do manually..
3.       Next I edited photos, created new collections, made new virtual copies and rated images on the Diginote.
4.       Thent imported the (updated) lrcat from the Diginote into the PC catalogue. All well, modification and virtual copies now included in the PC catalogue.
However no sign of the new collections even after copying over the LR settings!!! They are clearly not included in the settings.
So Ref 2 and 4, I am a bit a loss where the Collection settings are saved. Anyone with an answer?
5.       Since the Diginote in this setup is the “policeman” and I rather be safe than sorry I copied back/backed-up the Diginote folder to my laptop. Lo and behold! Guess what I see, the Local lrcat points to the local datadrive and all new collections etc are nicely shown. It seems a "simple" windows back up transfers the Collection data whereas a LR managed export/import action does not
Questions: What is good or bad in this procedure and why are the collection settings behaving so oddly? QQ where are they filed?
Think that ADOBE should come up with a no nonsense program option to sync between at least two computers or make things work in a network. I can’t be the only one with a similar setup.

Dear Sprengel,
Followed your advice. Works wonders! Thanks a million
Using Goodsync for sync/backup
Regards,
Met vriendelijke groet /Salutations/Salam Sejahtera/Tahiyati/Namaste/Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Schéi Gréiss/Cordiali saluti/Saludandolo cordialmente/Saludos/Cumprimentos/Atenciosamente/Maligayang Bati/Venlig Hilsen/Vänlig Hälsning/Ystävällisin terveisin/Ni Hao/Toate cele bune/S uvazhenijem/Dobry denj/Mooi Bly/Mei freonlike groetenis/Afablajn salutojn/Με φιλικούς χαιρετισµούς/Slán agus beannact/Üdvözlettel/Attayb Al Tahiyyat/Malugod na bumabati, С уважением, Mahalo, salam mesra, مع تحياتي

Buttons not working - InDesign (CS4) Interactive Pdf

I've been creating an interactive pdf document for a client over the last few months.
Initially, this was going to be a 70 page document, with limited interactivity (some forwards and back buttons etc.).
Now, this has grown and is a 220 page document, with rollover buttons that reveal other buttons layered on top of each other, various menus to navigate back and forth through the document, masses of content, images, bookmarks etc! And, I'm experiencing problems with buttons/ links now working when the pdf is exported.
Some of the buttons that don't work on exporting pdf, in the inDesign file appear to be set up in the correct way, I have even rebuilt some of them still with no luck on exporting them.
Is the document now too big and too complex to work??
If anyone at Adobe could give me some of their expert advice that would be much appreciated as myself and colleagues are now out of ideas!
Many thanks!

I've been having experiencing a similar problem after I chose to create a digital presentation with InDesign instead of PowerPoint.
It's basically a showcase of products with several non-linear navigation buttons (for which I use buttons, bookmarks and the "Go to Destination" option).
There are several videos, so I thought that the interactive PDF container would be the best choice for a single file, since this presentation is to be distributed to many sales representatives.
Everything was fine until there were about 100 "pages" (slides). After this point, the "Go to Destination" buttons stopped working (although the mouse cursor indeed changes to a pointing hand). Only the "Go to next page" buttons do work, and I have already tried to export the PDF in several ways. I've been really thrilled by what kinds of restrictions does an interactive PDF have.
Have you found any solutions to this matter? I think I have pushed this functionality over its limits...

Order unit and confirmation unit

Hi
Is there any way to achieve this..
I am creating a production order in units EA..(For Eg Welding rework order)
While confirming the unit should be in tonnes.
Say 100 ea of a material is equal to 1 tonne of confirmation qty..
In other words, if a worker confirms 100 qty of a material, in the confirmation table the qty should be 1 tnne.
If possible how to accomplish this..

"if a worker confirms 100 qty of a material, in the confirmation table the qty should be 1 tnne."
is ur issue is confirming in TONN or to store in table as TONN unit.
if ur issue is 2nd then its wont be possible at all, as the data is stored in the Base UoM.
and 1st case is easily possible using alternate unit of measure.
Regards,
Pravin Mukkawar
TCS canada

Complex Folders Vs Database Views - Discoverer 10g

Hello All,
The way complex folders works is almost similar to creating a database view and using that to create a custom folder.
So could someone advise wrt peformance etc which is a better option ?
Creating complex folders gives the flexibility to change whatever changes are rqd using disco admin and does not reqd even logging to which incase of DB views would need to be done to recreate a view incase of any changes. But would like to weigh down both the options on other parameters.
One thing i see is implementing oracle apps security is easier using DB views...but again..i could create custom folders using select * from table where gl_security_pkg concept and then create complex folders using these folders ?
Any thoughts would be helpful
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
vishalg

Vishalg.
The way I've always considered it is as follows:
1. I prefer not to be 'married' to one tool (ie: Disco) and therefore always recommend writing database views over custom / complex folders if possible. That way, database tools such as TOAD, SQL Nav, SQL Dev, etc. can also use the view (not to mention Oracle Reports, etc. as well).
With that in mind, I try to have most folders just pointing to a database view and all the 'fine tuning' done in the folder (ie: column order, hierarchies, security, etc.).
2. I do use custom folders when it's a LOV that's used in an item class. For example, you could create a simple LOV in a folder on an item, by just using that item for the source and the output. However, if it's a big dataset or you want to go to another table that's small and just has the distinct values for example, a custom folder is perfect for creating (I always put a _LOV extension on the folder name so I know) and setting an item class against.
Sometimes though, I've created a LOV for the list and then have just brought it in to a folder by simply pointing to it. It's the same kind of consideration in 1. above - if I'm creating a system that may be used by other tools - or God forbid - a client wants to move to another query tool like Cognos, BO, etc. then all the views are already there in the database and you just have to build their version of the middle layer (ie: catalog, universe, etc.).
3. I don't think I've ever had to use a complex folder. The concept is good though as in you can have 2 folders that are joined, but you want to create another folder that only has certain fields from each of the original 2 folders and that's the one a user uses.
But same consideration as above. Do I want to completely customize the Disco EUL, or use it more as a 'delivery device' (hey ... good term!).
One other big consideration for all this is that if you work in a shop where they have a big (read obnoxious) DBA who doesn't "allow views in his database" (been there), then you can always do the custom / complex folder thing from within Disco Admin and keep the DBA happy. However, once he's fired for being obnoxious and then new "touchie-feely" DBA comes on board, you may curse why you had to create a custom EUL in the first place.
All just your point of view, but I'm a view guy all the way.
Russ

Time Capsule backup works on one, but not all computers.

We have a Macbook and an iMac, both on Snow Leopard. Set them up on TC for backup several months ago, and they worked for a while. Then it stopped working for no obvious reason, with the message:
The network backup disk could not be accessed because there was a problem with the network username or password. Open Time Machine preferences to select the network backup disck and re-enter the correct username and password.
Of course userame and password were correct, because, first of all, they had not been changed, and second, because I could put in the wrong pw and it immediately would reject it. As it is, it takes it, counts down for 120 seconds, and then gives the above message.
Bought a new Macbook Pro, using Lion, and it works with the TC, seemingly proving that all settings on the TC are still good. Tried resetting TC. Tried the Cmd-Alt-p-r reboot, but neither worked.

Confirm network connectivity (try mounting the TC disk from the client), then (if that fails) look through and clear out all of the keychain passwords for any TC-related passwords and re-enter the current passwords, and then (if that fails) reset the disk password on both the TC and on the clients to a new and different password. Failing all that, I'd archive the backup from the TC and restart the TM backup for the failing systems.

Simple fade-in fade-out doesn't work with premiere 9

Hello,
I'm using Windows 7, service pack 1 on a Dell computer XPS 8300 (Intel® Core™ i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz × 8), 64 bits.
Complex fades work, but not simple as fade-in fade-out.
Note I had the same problem with Studio : it was solved by not using hardware acceleration. With Studio, it was possible to do so in the options.
What with Premiere ?
Thank's for any help

Christil
Premiere Elements 9 on Windows 7 64 bit (are you working from the 9.0.1 Update?)
Are you referring to the fade in fade out video audio shortcuts?
How are you doing what you refer to as "Complex Fades Work"?
I am not aware of any hardware acceleration control in any Premiere Elements options related
to Fades issues.
Please review the following related to the Fades shortcuts and see if any of it applies to your
situation.
http://www.atr935.blogspot.com/2013/06/pe11-timeline-fade-out-shortcuts-and.html
Is your issue specific to one particular project? Is this a "it worked before but not now" or "it never
worked before" type matter? Pending further details, we might consider deleting the Adobe
Premiere Elements Prefs file or, if necessary, the whole 9.0 Folder in which it exists.
But, we will await further details from you before deciding what next.
Thank you.
ATR

2-step transfer order confirmation radio frequency (RF) transaction

Could you please tell me if there is a RF-(mobile) transaction available for a 2-step transfer order confirmation?
Similar to LT1B / LT1C to confirm the "pick"- and "transfer"-step seperatly.
Thank you in advance!

In my opinion, there are no std. RF t-codes similar to LT1B/LT1C. Ref: http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/RadioFrequency(RF)Tcodes
However, this link: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/af/c466412ea98447e10000000a1550b0/content.htm says for a putaway process: When RF devices are in use in a warehouse, it is common to confirm TOs in two steps. This means that the worker confirms the first step of the TO at the source bin, and confirms the final step of the TO at the destination bin.
Hope this helps.

Difference partially confirmed activities via CN22 and CN25

Dear,
Apparantly there seems to be a difference in the SAP logics in partially confirming activities:
when we partially confirm an activity using transaction CN22, the activity is not planned anymore..
however we we partially confirm an activity using transaction CN25, the activit is still planned (status = DSPT)
What is the standard SAP logic around this ? Why is their a difference? Should and can the difference be corrected?
rgds,
bert

Hi Bert
Can you clarify - what are you trying to do? DPST is a system status when you try to transfer the dates from forecast to Basic.
Wheras using CN22 you can confirm the activity - means whatever been planned -trying to convert into actuals of the work performed. The same can be done in CN25 but with one network activity. Collective (work)confirmation can be done using CN27.
Regards
PP

Complex PO ; Work Confirmation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for