Concern with bug fix in V9 SP14

My team is concerned with the following fix in V9 SP14 of SAP Sourcing:
2945814/2013
Property contracts.Enable_publish_to_supplier_check.External_Phase has been
introduced to control the behavior of phase change of contract document using “Publish to
supplier” Checkbox .
When set to true, the contract document can be changed to external phase only when “Publish to supplier” Checkbox is checked on the Header tab of MA.
When Set to false, the contract document can be changed to external phase irrespective of the status of the publish to supplier check box (checked or not checked) on the Header tab of MA
The issue being, if you do not check the "Publish to Supplier" checkbox and move to an external phase, the supplier receives email notification but does not have access to the contract in the system.  We were hoping to get a better understanding of the purpose of this "fix" as it seems to us that it would just cause confusion to the supplier.  I'm hoping someone can provide some additional information on the purpose of putting this fix in place.

Hello
Contract Documents that are moving from an Internal Only phase to an Externally visible one can only be seen by their suppliers if the Publish to Supplier checkbox is checked (and the publish date is in the past) on the relative Agreement document.  Some of our customers want to be warned when they have not checked the Publish to Supplier checkbox on the agreement and others do not want to be warned.  We added a new system property to provide our customers with the ability to choose how they want CLM to behave.
If the new system property contracts.Enable_publish_to_supplier_check.External_Phase is set to FALSE (default value) CLM will behave as it did prior to SP14.   This means that you can change a contract document to a phase that is visible to the suppliers without checking the Publish to Supplier Checkbox on the header tab of the related Agreement.
However even though the Contract Document is in an external phase (example: Supplier Draft or Executed), the suppliers still cannot access it from the Supplier portal unless the Publish to Supplier Checkbox is checked.  Alerts to the Supplier of the newly visible contract document were triggered by the contract document phase change. Suppliers were receiving the Alert even though the Agreement owner forgot to check the Publish to Supplier checkbox on the Agreement.  This is the main problem we were trying to address.
If the new system property contracts.Enable_publish_to_supplier_check.External_Phase is set to TRUE then you are prevented from changing the phase of a contract document from an Internal Only to Externally visible to suppliers unless the Publish to Supplier Checkbox is checked on the Agreement.   This ensures that any externally visible contract documents can be accessed by the suppliers by ensuring that the Agreement owner has remembered to check the Publish to Supplier checkbox on the relative agreement.
Many of our customers do not wish their suppliers to use the Supplier Portal to see Agreements right now but plan to use that feature in the future.  Even though they have configured some of their contract document phases as external they don't want Suppliers to see externally visible contract documents until they are ready to check the Publish to Supplier Checkbox.   In the meantime they don't want to be prevented from changing the phase of a contract documents to Executed (for example).  These customer should leave the new property set to FALSE.
For those customers that want their suppliers to see the contract documents that are in an Externally visible phase and need to be reminded to check the Publish to Supplier checkbox first should set the new system property to TRUE.   
I hope this helps.
Anne McClelland

Similar Messages

  • When will apple release an update with bug fixes for ios 6?

    when will apple release an update with bug fixes for ios 6?

    When indeed. I purchased iPhone 5 64gb and have so far experienced the following issues/Bugs
    1. Flash on camera out of sync
    2. Cannot connect to some WIFI Bluetooth drvices
    3. Missing Album Artwork on iTunes album view
    4. Buggy and confused maps/satnav
    5. iMessage comes and goes
    6. Battery Life *****

  • Will Verizon update Galaxy S4 with bug fix verson of OS (4.4.3)?

    Supposedly google is releasing bug fixes for Kit Kat 4.4.2. Is Verizon going to push a version to the S4.?

        Ann154, thanks for helping us support Jallis with information regarding upcoming software update for our devices. As an added convenience, customers can sign up for alerts here http://bit.ly/n5snpq regarding upcoming updates.
    LasinaH_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Help with bug fix

    hey peeps i am running the following code to call a seperate gui from a seperate call but i get this error what does it mean? and how can i fix it
    C:\Documents and Settings\suresh\Desktop\ass\Mailc.java:107: non-static method setVisible(boolean) cannot be referenced from a static context
    Send.setVisible(true);
    public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e)
    if (ac.equals("Open")){
              Send = new Send();          
             Send.setVisible(true);
        }

    this is the class i'm trying to call
    import java.awt.*;
    import java.awt.event.*;
    import java.util.*;
    //import javax.mail.*;
    //import javax.mail.event.*;
    //import javax.mail.internet.*;
    public class Send extends Frame {
    String mailHost = "smtp.ntlworld.com";
    Label toLabel = new Label("To:");
    Label fromLabel = new Label("From:");
    Label subjectLabel = new Label("Subject:");
    Label contentLabel = new Label("Content:");
    Label statusLabel = new Label("Status:");
    TextField destination = new TextField();
    TextField source = new TextField();
    TextField subject = new TextField();
    TextArea content = new TextArea();
    Button send = new Button("Send Message");
    TextArea status = new TextArea();
    public static void main(String args[]){
      Send app = new Send();
    public Send() {
      super("Send");
      setup();
      addWindowListener(new WindowEventHandler());
      setSize(550,450);
      show();
    void setup() {
      setupMenuBar();
      layoutComponents();
      send.addActionListener(new ButtonHandler());
    void setupMenuBar() {
      MenuBar menuBar = new MenuBar();
      Menu fileMenu = new Menu("File");
      MenuItem fileExit = new MenuItem("Exit");
      fileExit.addActionListener(new MenuItemHandler());
      fileMenu.add(fileExit);
      menuBar.add(fileMenu);
      setMenuBar(menuBar);
    void layoutComponents() {
      int x = 10;
      int y = 50;
      // Set bounds
      toLabel.setBounds(x,y,50,25);
      destination.setBounds(x+70,y,300,25);
      fromLabel.setBounds(x,y+40,50,25);
      source.setBounds(x+70,y+40,300,25);
      subjectLabel.setBounds(x,y+80,50,25);
      subject.setBounds(x+70,y+80,300,25);
      contentLabel.setBounds(x,y+120,50,25);
      content.setBounds(x+70,y+120,300,100);
      statusLabel.setBounds(x,y+240,50,25);
      status.setBounds(x+70,y+240,300,100);
      send.setBounds(400,y,100,30);
      // Add components
      add(toLabel);
      add(destination);
      add(send);
      add(fromLabel);
      add(source);
      add(subjectLabel);
      add(subject);
      add(contentLabel);
      add(content);
      add(statusLabel);
      add(status);
      add(new Label(""));
    void sendMessage() {
      Properties properties = new Properties();
      properties.put("mail.smtp.host",mailHost);
      properties.put("mail.from",source.getText());
      //Session session = Session.getInstance(properties, null);
      try {
      // Message message = new MimeMessage(session);
      // InternetAddress[] address =
      //  {new InternetAddress(destination.getText())};
      // message.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, address);
      // message.setFrom(new InternetAddress(source.getText()));
      // message.setSubject(subject.getText());
      // message.setContent(content.getText(),"text/plain");
      // Transport transport = session.getTransport(address[0]);
      // transport.addConnectionListener(new ConnectionHandler());
      // transport.addTransportListener(new TransportHandler());
      // transport.connect();
      // transport.sendMessage(message,address);
      }catch(Exception e){
       status.setText(e.toString());
    // class ConnectionHandler extends ConnectionAdapter {
    // public void opened(ConnectionEvent e) {
      // status.setText("Connection opened.");
    // public void disconnected(ConnectionEvent e) {
    //  status.setText("Connection disconnected."); 
    // public void closed(ConnectionEvent e) {
      // status.setText("Connection closed."); 
    //class TransportHandler extends TransportAdapter {
    // public void messageDelivered(TransportEvent e) {
      // status.setText("Message delivered."); 
    // public void messageNotDelivered(TransportEvent e) {
      // status.setText("Message NOT delivered."); 
    // public void messagePartiallyDelivered(TransportEvent e) {
    //  status.setText("Message partially delivered."); 
    class ButtonHandler implements ActionListener {
      public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ev){
       String s=ev.getActionCommand();
    //  if(s.equals("Send Message")) sendMessage();
    class MenuItemHandler implements ActionListener {
      public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ev){
       String s=ev.getActionCommand();
       if(s=="Exit"){
        System.exit(0);
    class WindowEventHandler extends WindowAdapter {
      public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e){
       System.exit(0);
    //

  • Does anyone have problems occasionally with their slide to unlock on iphone 4s with the ios7 update? And do you think there will be a bug fix? Bit worried

    Hi everyone,
    I've recently updated my iphone 4s with the ios7 update and there was a bug fix I also downloaded recently but I hadn't noticed anything wrong at the time. I know it's not happened that often today but does anyone have any problems with their 'slide to unlock' button and have to reload their iphone again? Do you think there'll be a bug fix for it? Just worried as it's not old and I have a feeling I shouldn't have bothered with the update at all.

    Why would you think it's a bug?  If it were a bug EVERYONE would be having the same issue.
    Basics from the user guide are restart, reset, restore from backup, restore as new.

  • After updating to IOS 8.0.2 on my IPAD2 s Prorked great with last IOS version. Is there a bug fix?

    After updating to IOS 8.0.2 on my IPAD2, I cannot print to my Samsung Wireless Printer. It worked great with last IOS version. Is there a bug fix?

    Try this:
    1. Turn the router, iPad and printer off
    2. Turn on the router and then wait 30 seconds
    3. Turn on printer and then wait 30 seconds
    4. Turn on your iPad and test print.

  • Hi. Whenever I go through one of the menus in firefox, the links remain highlighted after my mouse passes over them. Is there a bug fix for this or is there something wrong with my computer? I am running windows 7 if that helps.

    Hi. Whenever I go through one of the menus in firefox, the links remain highlighted after my mouse passes over them. Is there a bug fix for this or is there something wrong with my computer? I am running windows 7 if that helps. This problem started ever since I upgraded to version 5.

    I have downloaded and used the iPod Reset Utility, alot that did. My current state is iTunes on my XP Home with SP3 sees the iPod. When I drag a song to the iPod, the Sync message appears for about 5 minutes, then the Apple symbol appears. But no song has been transferred to the iPod.
    I tried to tap into the XP iTunes database from my iBook, but although it acted like it would add the XP library to the iBook library, it did not. I've got 19 Gs of songs on the XP. If I have to load each song from its original CD to get it on my iBook I'm going to start looking for some other app or device so that I can listen to my music.
    It is a shame, in the old days, Apple techs use to look at what was going on, now it appears they don't, so they never know they have problems until Apple's profits fall.

  • Is j2sdk-1_4_2_18-windows-amd64.exe rel with a FIX on Portal/SPNEGO Bug

    I am using j2sdk-1_4_2_17-windows-amd64.exe for my EP7.0 SP14.
    My SPNEGO is completed and the authentication is working fine. But the Portal Logon Page is coming when I am using the URL : http://PortalServername.Domain name/irj/portal.
    Found a note : 1057474 which says all JDK version 1.4.2_14 to 1.4.2_17 is having a Kerberos bug.
    My question here is should I install JDK 1.4.2_18 amd 64 ... and give a try or should downgrade back to 13 .... Will this impact my EP 7.0 SP 14 or any other application.
    Points will be awarded for any help.

    Got the Solution for the SPNEGO Bug Fixing :
    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6572805
    For any JDK Version simply add :
    isInitiator = false in your Visual Admin
    -->Security Provider -->com.sun.security.gss.accept -->Krb5LoginModule
    Parameter isInitiator and Value false. Save it and take a bounce of J2EE.
    Njoy.

  • Apple Released iOS 7.1 with Major AirPlay Bug Fix

    Apple released iOS 7.1 with interface refinements, bug fixes, improvements and new features on Monday. But has the Airplay bug been fixed?
    During the test of X-Mirage, we have found that AirPlay on iOS 7 is not as stable as on iOS 6 and we have reported a serious bug to Apple:
    iOS 7 BUG – The devices stop sending mirroring data to Apple TV or X-Mirage one minute after iOS devices auto-locks
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5468657
    After using the iOS 7.1 today, we find that Apple has fixed the bug and AirPlay is more stable than before, so our distinguished X-Mirage users, you can update to iOS 7.1 freely and enjoy more fantastic AirPlay Mirroring and Streaming services. Getting the update is easy. Go to Settings. Select General. And tap Software Update.

    thanks for the information?

  • I have to keep turning on an off the wi-fi connection to connect to my network after system shutdown with mountain lion, I did not have to do this with 10.6.8 before I upgraded, is there a bug fix in the works?

    I have to keep turning on an off the wi-fi connection to connect to my network after system shutdown with mountain lion, I did not have to do this with 10.6.8 before I upgraded, is there a bug fix in the works?

    Many have posted this fix:
    Go to System Preferences > Energy Saver > Computer Sleep ... set to anything greater than the 15 min. default setting.

  • [svn:bz-trunk] 18926: bug fix BLZ-570 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error  : StackOverflowError

    Revision: 18926
    Revision: 18926
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-12-01 14:07:19 -0800 (Wed, 01 Dec 2010)
    Log Message:
    bug fix BLZ-570 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error : StackOverflowError
    We put hard limit to the max object nest level to prevent StackOverFlowError. the default max object nest level is 1024 and it can be configured in the endpoint/serialziation section in service-config.xml.
    This needs documentation.
    Checkintests pass
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-570
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/errors.properties
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/endpoints/AbstractEndpoint.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/SerializationContext.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf0Input.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf3Input.java
        blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/AmfIO.java

  • [svn:bz-4.0.0_fixes] 20451: backporting bug fix BLZ-570/ BLZ-620 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error  : StackOverflowError  We put hard limit to the max object nest level to prevent StackOverFlowError .

    Revision: 20451
    Revision: 20451
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2011-02-24 08:33:31 -0800 (Thu, 24 Feb 2011)
    Log Message:
    backporting bug fix BLZ-570/BLZ-620 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error : StackOverflowError  We put hard limit to the max object nest level to prevent StackOverFlowError. the default max object nest level is 1024 and it can be configured in the endpoint/serialziation section in service-config.xml. This needs documentation.  Checkintests pass
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-570
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-620
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/errors.properties
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/endpoints/AbstractEndpoint.j ava
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/SerializationContext.java
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf0Input.java
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf3Input.java
        blazeds/branches/4.0.0_fixes/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/io/amf/AmfIO.java

    Dear Pallavi,
    Very useful post!
    I am looking for similar accelerators for
    Software Inventory Accelerator
    Hardware Inventory Accelerator
    Interfaces Inventory
    Customization Assessment Accelerator
    Sizing Tool
    Which helps us to come up with the relevant Bill of Matetials for every area mentioned above, and the ones which I dont know...
    Request help on such accelerators... Any clues?
    Any reply, help is highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Manish Madhav

  • [svn:bz-3.x] 20443: back porting bug fix BLZ-570/ BLZ-620 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error  : StackOverflowError  We put hard limit to the max object nest level to prevent StackOverFlowError .

    Revision: 20443
    Revision: 20443
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2011-02-23 21:19:22 -0800 (Wed, 23 Feb 2011)
    Log Message:
    back porting bug fix BLZ-570/BLZ-620 Double linked list with lot of objects result in BlazeDS Error deserializing error : StackOverflowError  We put hard limit to the max object nest level to prevent StackOverFlowError. the default max object nest level is 1024 and it can be configured in the endpoint/serialziation section in service-config.xml. This needs documentation.  Checkintests pass
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-570
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-620
    Modified Paths:
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/common/src/java/flex/messaging/errors.properties
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/endpoints/AbstractEndpoint.java
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/io/SerializationContext.java
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf0Input.java
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/io/amf/Amf3Input.java
        blazeds/branches/3.x/modules/core/src/java/flex/messaging/io/amf/AmfIO.java

  • Nwrfc 0.0.5 with important bug fix!

    I have just pushed version 0.0.5 of the new gem to rubygems.org (you can also access the latest repo at GitHub).
    0.0.5 introduces an important bug fix in Table#each. Previously only the first row would continuously be returned. Now you can actually treat a Table like an Enumerable!

    To quote Metalink Note 161818.1 (Oracle Server (RDBMS) Releases Support Status Summary)
    "Terminology Used in this Article
    Patch Set
    *Patch sets are cumulative. For example, 10.1.0.4 includes all the fixes in 10.1.0.3 as well as new fixes for 10.1.0.4.*      "

  • Bug Fix Request - To Admins

    Hey there Logic Pro forum Admins,
    I've got a small bug fix request for you. I'm using Logic Studio to lay down VO, and I ran across a potentially distressing bug. When you are recording in the arrange window and you click on the playhead, it erases your record take. It doesn't just remove it from the arrange window and place it in the bin, it erases the take completely.
    In my case, it was good that I caught it early on in a take. But imagine if I had clicked the on the playhead after a 5 - 10 minute take, or perhaps longer? We all know that time is money, particularly in VO sessions. The actor would have had to redo the take, and I would have had to pay the VO director and actor accordingly.
    To be entirely clear, it wasn't as if I had purposefully clicked on the playhead while recording. I was actually trying to rename a marker and accidentally hit the playhead instead. The effect this has had on my session is that I'm now deathly afraid to do anything (including cutting previously recorded regions or renaming them) while rolling. I'm sure you can appreciate my dilemma. Yes I could simply not click on the playhead, but you know how it is in the heat of a session. Things need to happen fast, and your clicking accuracy isn't what it normally is etc.
    Anyway, in future iterations of Logic Studio, it would be really really nice (not to mention heart attack preventing) if the user could disable this 'feature'. Please please please fix this!
    Kind regards,
    -Justin
    Message was edited by: Inteleky

    I'm not sure if what you're experiencing is a bug. I just tried this. While recording, I hit the playhead, and it simply stoped the recording where it was when I hit it, although the session continued to play. Try it yourself and watch the transport - the record button will go off, but the play will continue. When I did it just now, it DID NOT erase the recording that was in progress. Everything that had been recording until I hit the playhead was still there. This action makes sense to me. If the playhead gets touched and jumps to another part of the project, the action of recording SHOULD stop.
    If you're really concerned about this, I'd do some experimenting. Just sit down and start recording, and see what happens if you hit the transport, or if you do other actions you're wanting to do. Again, everything that had recorded until the moment I hit the playhead, was there. If your ENTIRE RECORDING gets deleted when you hit the playback, then something's wrong with your Logic. Are you on 8.0.2?
    Why are you feeling the need to edit while recording, anyway? Especially when you're recording important stuff??
    On a sidenote, you're not going to reach anyone from Apple on this forum. You need to go here:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/logicpro.html
    Good Luck!

Maybe you are looking for

  • [SOLVED]Can't access some websites because of timedatectl

    so earlier I was being very stupid and messing around with timedatectl since the taskbar displayed the wrong time. I just noticed this and I remembered that I had changed the BIOS time last night. so now the BIOS time is set to UTC, and I have the co

  • Command Right/Left stopped working

    Don't know why or how, but the shortcuts command-right and command-left are not working any more. and when I go to the keyboard viewer, and press on of those, the arrows key don't get highlighted. (without command pressed they do). Any ideas?

  • Install_Check_1.6 tool and Solaris 10 5/09 panics after GRUB on Dell T7400

    Hello anybody! Apparently the Solaris 10 5/09 drop panics after the GRUB menu, for Solaris Installation. Similarly the Install_Check_1.6 Tool for Hardware Compatablity seems to do the same. I can't capture the Kernel messages that appear on the scree

  • Not a new topic but...I cannot connect to Itunes store

    Seems like the same old song and dance. I downloaded the latest Itunes version and ever since my itunes not only opens slowly, but I cannot access the Itunes store. My firewall allows Itunes, I have flushed, added certificates, checked settings..you

  • Cant make a 720p Blu ray as all transcode settings come out as 1080

    HI Im trying to make a 1280 720 59i blu ray disk. My input is 29.97 progressive 1080p from Premiere. Whatever settings I use my encoded BD-Folder build always appears to be in 1920 1080. I choose my default transcode settings after dynamic link from