Condition Type in an Invoice for Output tax

Hi,
In our Invoice we have different condition types for Output tax. These are the condition types :- MWST, IDM2, ZVLT and IDM3. All thse condition tpye refer to Output tax, although only MWST holds the actual value. But there is certain setting (i guess structure ikomv) which is sending all the condtion types in the IDOC. As the remaining conditon types are not required it is further giving an Error in XI. Please tell us which is the transaction that configures these condtions  and also the required changed in our configuration.
regards,
      Milan Thaker

I think this can be handled by adding a filter by condition type in the distribution model. See transaction BD64.

Similar Messages

  • While creating VK11 for output tax error should be ther for input tax codes

    Hi all,
    while creating condition record VK11 for output tax ,in condition record only output tax code should be possible ,if they use any input tax code then error messsage should come or system should not allow to create.how we do this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Bala

    Hi Jelena Perfiljeva ,
    Thanks for the Reply
    Its  JIVP,JIVC , VAT condition types (India).

  • Error for output tax code:Tax code I4 may only contain one assignment line.

    Hi
    While posting customer invoice with output tax code, I am getting following error.
    Tax code I4 may only contain one assignment line.
    Please help me resolve.
    Regards
    Rekha

    There are quite some answered questions in this forum for this issue.
    Here is one.
    Error in Sample document (Message no. FF731)
    Also, please search the forum with the following search key words.
    Tax AND code AND may AND only AND contain AND one AND assignment AND line
    Make sure you select all posts, not just the past 90 days (the default option), and you will see quite some hits.

  • VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

    Hi All,
    I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
    When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
    Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the  internal table tkomv[].
    If any one came across  this scenario can you please help me.
    Request your valuable inputs

    Hi,
    Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
    Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
    Hope this will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    Krishna O

  • While creating  VK11 for output tax it should allow only Output taxcode

    Hi all,
    while creating condition record VK11 for output tax ,in condition record only output tax code should be possible ,if they use any input tax code then error messsage should come or system should not allow to create.how we do this.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Bala

    Hi ,
    If you see it practically in Production..You will be maintaing condition record once and even if changes, it won't be so often. Secondly in Tax procedure what ever Tax codes are present that will displayed as a choice while maintainig condition record.
    If  it affecting by maintaining wrong code then better would to be educate Business users as per my understanding.
    Thanks,
    Veerendra

  • Pricing date for the tax condition type should be invoice creation date

    HI Folks,
    As per the current design taxes conditions are determining based on the Service rendered date which is similar to the GI date and pricing type is G in copy control .
    New requirement is taxes should calculate based on the Invoice creation date in the invoice.in order to acheive the solution i have customized the tax related condition type functionality "pricing date" as KOMP-ERDAT but still system calcualting the taxes based on the service rendered date and same also writing in the invoice also.
    pLease help me out what need to be configured here to acheive the solution.
    Regards,
    Ram.

    Hello XYZ,
    As you said the tax is calculated in Taxware system, i think taxware system is configured to calculate the taxes based on the "service rendered date". That is the reason why even you have changed the pricing date to be billing date for condition type XR1 taxware is not behaving as you expected.
      You have two options.
    1. Invocie creation date/ blling date is available in the structure "TAX_CAL_ITEM_IN00".If it is available in the structure ask the Taxware team to make changes in their system to consider that field value instead of the service rendered date.
    2. Alternatively you can over write the filed which contains the service rendered date value with the value of billing date. This way no changes required in Taxware system. You can do that in cusotmer exit  "EXIT_SAPLFYTX_USER_001" include ZXFYTU03 .
       Based on my exeperince i think the consistant approach would be going with option 1 . Please revert if you need furhter information on the same
    Thanks,
    Srini
    Edited by: srini vasarao on Jul 14, 2011 12:02 PM

  • Condition types MWSI and MWVO for TAXES

    Hi,
    I am trying to create the new condition types MWSI, MWVO and accounting keys SIV, SIO for new tax keys (TAXES) for the report RFIDESM340. I didnu2019t find any instruction about the parameters behind MWS and MWVO.
    Can someone advise me on this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Detlef
    Edited by: Detlef Weiss on Mar 15, 2010 1:06 PM

    Dear,
    The difference between pricing conditions PB00 and PBXX is :
    PB00- automatic pricing - can be used for automatic pricing determination
    PBXX- manual pricing - used for manual pricing.
    When you maintain the pricing condition for the PO, the system will look at the available condition records (for PB00) and make the automatic pricing determination. In case, such condition records were not defined, then it is mandatory that you have to maintain manually the pricing condition where PBXX will be automatically defaulted in replacement for PB00.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Condition Type NAVS not determined for Goods PO

    Hi all,
    I am working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.6C.The problem im facing is for the tax condition determination for PO for Goods type which replicated from SRM to PO .
    In case of Service PO,the conditions are determined correctly and can be seen in the PO print out.However In case of a goods PO,if i goto conditions tab in ME23N for the PO,the conditions (NAVs) are not determined as well as they cant be seen in PO print .
    The  config on R/3 side is Correct as in case of manual PO(PO created directly in R/3),the conditions are determined correctly.
    Now when i debuuged the BAPi "BAPi_PO_CREATe1",i observed the following:
    If i chnage the field PO_PRICE in the table POITEM to "1",then conditions are determined corretcly for the PO.However by dfault,the value for this field comes to "2".
    This field is nothing but indicator of the price i.e. 1 for Gross and 2 for Net.
    Can anybody explain  me the link between this price and condition types determined in PO.
    Thanks.

    Check out SAP Note 580225 - Purchasing BAPIs: Conditions and pricing
    Hope it helps

  • VPRS Condition is missing in invoice for bacth determine line item

    Hi Gurus,
    I have an Concern, My user has created Sales order with three line items.
    He did delivery and Invoice individually for each line item.
    For 2 line items he entered batch manually and did invoice there we didn't find any issue.
    For third line item he did auto batch determination there for that item VPRS condition is missing in invoice.
    I have checked the note ( 70038 ) and I have applied the note also, But still I am facing same problem.
    Please provide me solution if any modification need to be done,
    Thanks and Regards
    Subbu

    Hi Subbu
    As VPRS condition type is coming for the first 2 line items and not for 3rd line item , so kindly check the Material Master Record->Accounting tab.What is the difference between the 3rd material and another 1st and 2nd materials.Also check in the Analysis what it is showing for the third line item billing document
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Rebate condition type updation in Invoices

    Hi friends,
    This is an urgent issue.
    There is rebate condition type Z*** with 0.00% USD.
    Invoices were created and Rebate Condition value is 0.00 USD in All the invoices.
    Now user mainatined the Z*** values as 7% USD.
    User wants to update all the previous invoices where this Z*** value is 0.00 USD.
    Meaning all invoices should get update with 7% USD for Z*** condition Type.
    There is any program to update these condition type value with new in all the invoices.
    Please provide me solution ASAP.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Gopal.

    Dear Customer,
    if a condition is statistical, then the condition have no influence to FI.
    These conditions are not trasfered to FI.
    These condtions are only relevant for CO or statistics.
    I hope that the information is helpful.
    regards
    Claudia

  • Multiple rebate condition types in one invoice

    I had defined multiple rebate condition types as Y000, Y001 and Y002, which are montly offtake rebate, distance rebate and yearly offtake rebate.
    Y000 and Y001 can be in the same validity period and also will be applicable to the same invoicee.
    When i create a rebate agreement for customer for Y000 and go for the settlement of the rebate it is happening fine.
    But for the same customer, i had defined Y001 as a rebate agreement type for the same period and materilal.
    The sales volume is not updated in the rebate agreement. Evenif I do VBOF the sales volume is not updated.
    the error that comes while doing VBOF is :
    "7000158055 Document number RCFL 7000158055 2011 was already assigned
    7000158053 Document number RCFL 7000158053 2011 was already assigned
    7000158052 Document number RCFL 7000158052 2011 was already assigned
    7000158054 Document number RCFL 7000158054 2011 was already assigned"
    Please help me to solve this problem.
    Mrs. Swati Pawar

    Hello Swati,
    the suggestion of JP is correct.
    I explain it better.
    - the document type of FI document created from SD depends on the customizing of billing type field TVFK-BLART. If it is blank, then by default is 'RV'.
    - if the number range assigned to the account document type is External, then the FI document gets the same number of the SD invoice.
    - transaction VBOF creates FI document referred to SD invoice. If it has external number range, and an FI document already exist with same number (created when SD invoice has been released to accounting), then the errof F5152 occurs.
    SOLUTION:
    in the selection screen of VBOF there is the field FI-Doc-type. Here you should specify the FI document type that should be created by execution of VBOF, and of course it must have number range internal.
    Please try this.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • Is there a service to list invoice types and all invoices for a customer?

    Hi gurus!
    The header/subject speakes for it self: is there a service method that lists all available invoice types?
    The customer uses ecc with ehp3 and I have only found a service for getting an invoice for an invoice Id. But I also want to list all invoices for a certain vendor/customer and to list all invoices for one or more search criteria and thus get a list of invoices that spans over several vendors/customers.
    I have got the service info from the following place:
    http://help.sap.com/content/documentation/esoa/docu_esoa_erp.htm
    and there chosen "Enterpise Services for Enhancement Package 3 for SAP ERP 6.0".
    I'm not sure I have read the library of services correctly though. Is it possible that a method for invoice can be under a service which is not a service for invoice? Or is the library very "strict" so that I can assume that there actually are no services for the purposes stated above? There is no search functionality that I can see...
    All the best
    Benny

    I'm not looking to cripple my computer over a virus software hang-up.
    The computer is already crippled. Remove the Intego product, which is worse than useless and worse than the imaginary "viruses" would be if they really existed, which they don't, by following the instructions on this page. If you have a different version, the procedure may be different.
    Back up all data before making any changes.

  • Condition type PMIN Minimum Price for material

    Hello
    We have a requirement where we need to maintain minimum price of material in master.
    Whenever in sales order price is entered and is lower than minium price for material maintained it should automatically add the difference as surcharge. If the price maintained is more than the minimum price maintained it should not do anything.
    I guess we have to use Ctype PMIN for this. I amy using this condition type have created a condition record and maintained a minimum price for this material f09 as rs 1000
    Now when i am creating sales order price picked up from pricing condition record for that customer is 500 . Now it should automatically add Rs 500 in condition line item for condition type PMIN.
    What is happening is it is showing me my base price as 500 and it is adding PMIN as 1000 to the base price and showing total base price as 1500
    If price maintained in pricing condition record is more than 1000 for ex 1200 even then too it is adding PMIN as 1000 and showing total base price as 2200.
    Please let me know what am i missing...
    Regards
    SANJEEV

    -T code VK11 - Maintain condition records - You can use the upper and lower limits functionality in the condition records for those specific materials.
    -Also Make this condition type as mandatory then check it out.
    Regards

  • Condition type to block pricing for particular plants

    Dear All,
    We have one Sales Organisation under which 40 plants are there. I want to block a condition type for 10 plants. Please suggest me what are the different alternatives to do that?

    Dear Suresh,
    As your Condition Type is used in almost 30 plants mean it would be determined by Condition Access.
    Now as you know a Access Sequence would be assigned to the Condition Type & subsequently Condition Tables are assigned to Assequence Seq, to search for Condition Records.
    Now include Plant as one of the search strategy in your Access Sequence / Condition Tables. Then maintain Condition Records for 30 plants in which you require this Condition Type.
    For rest of the 10 plants as there is no Condition Record, the Condition Type would be be determined for these Plants.
    Hope this helps...
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Mehta

  • Billing and excise invoice for composits tax concept

    Hi,
      I want to know the billing process, we are in manufacturing as well as in service providing,  in manufacturing  for the finish material  for the billing we follow the process,  after delivery with VL01N  we create the billing document with VF01  then ref. to VF01 document we do J1IIN  then in VF02 we release the billing document for accounting,  and in case of service invoice  from sales order we directly creat the billing document with VF01 and release to accounting,  so I want to confirm whethere this is the right process,
    Second think which I want to confirm  as per the new composit tax concept , we are giving service along wit material  the tax is service tax on
    BASE amount                          XYZ
    Service tax      10%                  on XYZ
    Ecess               2%                    On service tax amount
    SECES              1%                     on service tax
    BVAT                                      Addition of all above
    VAT                  12 %              on BVAT amount
    ,  for this which procedure to be follow,     
    VA01 , VL01N, VF01 , VF02 release to accounting  or
    VA01, VL01N, VF01, J1IIN, VF02, release to accounting.
    regards,
    zafar

    If your requirement to have a pricing procedure to meet this requirement, try as follows:-
    100:::PR00::::Base Price
    110:::ZSER::::Service Tax::::100
    120:::JECS::::Ecess::::::::::::::110:::::::110
    130:::JA1X::::SHECess:::::::::110:::::::110
    140:::BVAT::: (Not clear what is this)
    150:::JIN7::::Vat:::::::::::::::::::::140:::::::140
    In this, if you want to levy ED also, then you need to insert appropriately in the above
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

Maybe you are looking for