Condition types in SRM for mapping purposes with backend contracts

Hello,
We need to map condition types for the creation of a Backend contract on the basis of a accepted bid.
We use SRM 5.0 but our products do not have prices in their product master!
We use the catalog funcion to indicate the prices of the materials. for service-items we manually add the prices in the Shopping cart.
How can I find out what conditions types we use in these circumstances in SRM 5.0?
What condition type are we using in the case of materials?
What condition type are we using in the case of service-items?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart

Hi
You can map the condition type 01CT (gross price) in SRM with PB00 for Gross Price in contracts. Standard SRM generally work with simple pricing with gross price condition types and do not have complex conditions unless you customize it. For material or services, it should matter from condition perspective unless you have done some specific customization.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Similar Messages

Pricing condition types in SRM 7.0

Hi,
We are using SRM 7.0, we have decided to go ahead with the pricing proceedure and the condition types which are there in ECC the same should be replicated to SRM.
We have created the same pricing proceedure and the calculation scheema in SRM.
Now my requirement is when i create a PO with the conditions and when i am transfering to ECC the PO should also be with the condition types. It should be a similar PO in ECC.
Is this can be addressed.

Hello All,
As I have already mentioned the condition types in SRM are identically matched to ERP condition type hence the data is flowing correctly and even the idoc has the z-condition type Z123.The IDOC in backend ERP has status 53.
On trial and error method we did unchecked the manual indicator check in the pricing schema for the relevant condition type and because of that now the Z-condiiton type can be seen in the backend ERP contract.
If the indicator was checked, this means that this condition can be maintained only manually (directly in the transaction
ME32K in ECC) and nothing can be transfer from other source.
Note: If the same condition type is being used in more than one pricing procedure then ensure that the check bok is unchecked for agianst the relevant condition type.
Thanks,
Yatin

Which CAPS 6 Project Type is best for integration purposes?

Which CAPS 6 Project Type is best for integration purposes?
CAPS 6 is the company standard for integrating applications so I'm looking to get started converting XML from one format to another.
Which project type is best to use for this scenario?
Thanks in advance.

As John suggested you should properly post this question in an Visual Studio forum:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=visualstudiogeneral&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
Visual C++, C#, VB.Net are all running on the DOT.NET enviroment and are different languages that have no difference in functionality.
C and C++ does not run on the DOT.NET platform, but directly on the CPU.
C# does also deals with processes and threads, and you can load DLL's at runtime/compile time if you want.
C# also have console applications.
http://technicaltrix.blogspot.dk/

My project need to be saved as a Video_TS/Audio_TS file for burning purposes with a company that does bulk burring. how do i go by this?

my project needs to be saved as a Video_TS/Audio_TS file for burning purposes with a company that does bulk burring. how do i go by this?

VIDEO_TS (and an empty audio_ts) folders are part of a standardised DVD structure. So, what you need a DVD-authoring tool. FCPX offers to create a very simple DVD, one movie, two designs (black or white), no menu, done. Older Macs came pre-installed with iLife/iDVD … export your project as a 'Master', drag into iDVD, select any design template ... Apple axed 'disk creation' about 7 years ago ... the AppStore is crowded with other, convenient, consumer, template based tools. Professional structured DVDs are only optional with obsolete DVDSP (part of FC-suite) or Adobe Encore .....

Creating new pricing condition type in srm ecs

Hi Guru's
I see that there is an option to select the Source system " local" , "other system, eg: R/3" while creating a new condition type in SRM. can you please let me know what is the importance of this? can we determine price in srm using backend pricing conditions? can we invoke the backend pricing procedure from srm and populate the price in SRM PO?
any helpful info would be appreciated
regards
deepu

Hi Nitin,
Appreciate your response. Can you please let me know how major development is it? if you can provide highlights that would be helpful. I do understand that we can customize the pricing procedure in SRM. Can you please share if you have any documentation regarding creating new condition types, access sequences, condition records in SRM similar to ECC? it would be appreciated if you can send it to pradeepwsu(gmail) id.
Thanks in advance
Deepu

Problem with Condition Type in BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2 for Txn VA21

Hi All,
I am using BAPI_QUOTATION_CREATEFROMDATA2 for Sales Quotation by txn VA21.
In this txn,There are 22 condition types available in my system.
The problem is,it is updating every condition type twice.
Pls give me the solution.
Regards,
Shiv Kant

Hi,
I am giving billing document code, we are using BAPI to upload billing documents into SAP.
you can check pricing conditions code. we are using only two pricing condition types. our technical consultant hardcoded condition types.
wa_billingdata-salesorg = wa_bill5-sorg.
    wa_billingdata-distr_chan = wa_BILL5-dist.
    wa_billingdata-division = wa_BILL5-div.
    wa_billingdata-doc_type = 'ZSO5'.
    wa_billingdata-ordbilltyp = 'FX'.
    wa_billingdata-bill_date = wa_BILL5-BDATE.
    wa_billingdata-sold_to = wa_BILL5-CUSTNO.
*    wa_billingdata-price_date = WA_BILL1-BDATE.
   wa_billingdata-country = wa_BILL5-CNTRY.
    wa_billingdata-bill_to = wa_BILL5-custno.
    wa_billingdata-currency = WA_BILL5-CURR.
    wa_billingdata-wbs_elem = wa_bill5-wbsele.
    wa_billingdata-xblnr = wa_bill5-billno.
    wa_billingdata-zuonr = wa_bill5-invoiceno.
flag1 = 1.
endif.
translate wa_bill5-matdesc to upper case.
    SELECT MATNR FROM MARA INTO IT_MARA up to 1 rows WHERE MATNR = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
            endselect.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      wa_billingdata-plant = wa_BILL5-PLANT.
      wa_billingdata-NO_MATMAST = ' '.
      wa_billingdata-material = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
      wa_billingdata-REQ_QTY = '1'.
      wa_billingdata-ACCTASGNMT = '05'.
   else.
       wa_billingdata-ACCTASGNMT = '05'.
       wa_billingdata-NO_MATMAST = 'X'.
       wa_billingdata-SHORT_TEXT = 'ADAGE MATERIAL'.
       wa_billingdata-TAXCL_1MAT = '0'.
       wa_billingdata-SALES_UNIT = 'EA'.
       wa_billingdata-material = WA_BILL5-MATDESC.
       wa_billingdata-REQ_QTY = '1'.
   endif.
flag = flag + 1.
    wa_billingdata-ref_item = flag.
    append wa_billingdata to billingdata.
    wa_conditiondata-data_index = flag.
     wa_CONDITIONDATA-cond_value = WA_BILL5-ADVERTISCOST.
    wa_conditiondata-cond_type = 'EK01'.
    append wa_conditiondata to conditiondata.
clear wa_conditiondata.
    wa_conditiondata-data_index = flag.
     wa_conditiondata-cond_value = WA_BILL5-COMM.
    wa_conditiondata-cond_type = 'ZCOM'.
    append wa_conditiondata to conditiondata.
clear wa_conditiondata.
IF TESTRUN IS INITIAL.
move-corresponding wa_bill5 to wa_bill2.
wa_bill2-status = 'P'.
append wa_bill2 to it_bill2.
modify zzbilling from table it_bill2.
commit WORK.
ENDIF.
REFRESH IT_BILL2.
endloop.
flag1 = 0.
flag = 0.
IF TESTRUN IS INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BILLINGDOC_CREATEMULTIPLE'
*   EXPORTING
*     CREATORDATAIN         = creaord
*     TESTRUN               = 'X'
*     POSTING               = 'X'
    TABLES
     BILLINGDATAIN         = billingdata
     CONDITIONDATAIN       = conditiondata
*     CCARDDATAIN           =
*     TEXTDATAIN            =
*     ERRORS                =
      RETURN                = bapiret
      SUCCESS               = succ.
Regards,
Chandra

Condition types from SRM to backend

Hi All,
When accepted bid (complex prices with condition types) is converted to PO, in backend PO is created with net price only. Is there a way to move the condition types also to backend. Can we use any Badi in this case?
Thanks in advance.
Will reward full points for the reply.
Venu

Hi
<b>Either you need to maintain the Condition types locally in SRM system by maintaining Z tables and then create your own logic for pricing in SRM. I guess, this will be much more complex activity.</b>
<u>I know there is some issues, but, Anyways, you have to go for this approach.
You need to go for custom fields and then get the data passed back over to R/3 PO using any of the BADIs
BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK / BBP_TARGET_OBJECTS / BBP_TARGET_OBJTYPE / BBP_CREATE_PO_NEW
in SE18 Transaction.
Refer OSS note - 672960 and 485891 for creating customer fields.</u>
Also, incase this don't suits your requiremnents, Please raise an OSS message with SAP.
Regards
- Atul

Condition types from SRM system t backened system

Hi,
We are using SRM 7.0, we have decided to go ahead with the pricing proceedure and the condition types which are there in ECC the same should be replicated to SRM.
We have created the same pricing proceedure and the calculation scheema in SRM.
Now my requirement is when i create a PO with the conditions and when i am transfering to ECC the PO should also be with the condition types. It should be a similar PO in ECC.
Is this can be addressed.

Hi
I wish to update on this further:
Under Copying rules for Conditions, for Source table 350 (Sales Organization), I am maintaining report "RV15CC03" which is material to material.
I think I need to use something different since I am copying data from Sales Org to Sales Org.
I don't find a suitable program for Sales Org here.
Any ideas on how to go about.
Thanks
Satya

NAVM condition type not getting updated in PO with account assignment K

Hi Sap Gurus
Pls help me resolving this issue
We had created a PO (K-Acc Assignment) with certain tax percentage (16%) in the past .When we view the PO in display mode we can see the equivalent value of 16% being appearing in NAVM at item level.Further on when we hit the Invoice TAB and try to view the taxes.We can see the net price being updated in BASB condition type,and the equivalent value of 16% being updated in AP1I.
This looks to be perfect but when we again go back to he same PO screen from Tax Screen the value that had intially appeared in NAVM(equivalent of 16 tax%) becomes zero.This happens so for the old PO.
But for new PO nothing is appearing in NAVM condition tab in PO item level,inspite of the fact that some tax percentage has been maintained.Again this tax percentage can be viewed from Invoice TAB and it takes part in the calcualtion updating th AP!I key mentioned earlier.SOme changes have been made in the config due to which all new POs being created now as no value being updated in NAVM tab inspite of maintaining the tax percentage.
All other std settings have been used.
Additional info:
In the pricing procedure from FICO side..for the condition type AP1I accrual key NAV is used.
It has the access seq MWST.
cond class,claculatio type,cond category for AP1I being: Taxes,percentage,Tax respectively
AP1I is not marked as statistical.
NAVM has no acess seq.
cond class,claculatio type,cond category for AP1I being: Taxes,Fixed amount,Input Tax not deductible(N) respectively.
NAVM is marked as statistcal
pls give me some leads so as to identify why the value does not appear in NAVM condition type

system wont generate any controlling document for noted items downpayment and normal payments.
Because all are balance sheet accounts. Controlling documents will generated for only P&L accounts.
Your analysis correct.

Table in which changes to condition type is recorded for a contract

Hi Experts
We are working on customised report in classical Real estate in which for a particular contract changes done in the condition tab are to be displayed.
In this report we want to restrict condition types related to Budget and forecast which are already existing in the system.
We dont want any changes done to those condition type to be shown in the report. We are in the process of creating Ztable to link it with our report. But we are facing difficulty as we can find tables which will record user changes for contract as a whole. We want to know details about table which record changes done by the user for every condition related to that contract.
Can you pls let me know the tables which record this changes ?

Hi,
unfortunately I am still not sure if I got your question right. Change documents show all changes of the contract, also of condition types.
Table VICDCOND stores the conditions of the contract. Maybe you are looking for this.
Hope this helps.
Regards, Franz

Condition Types EDI1 EDI2 For Purcahse Order

Hi All,
The vendor sends a price change(855) that can be accepted automatically. The IDoc is updated but the purchase order is not updated with the confirmed price.
I found the below from SAP Market Place
Answer:
Prerequisites for the use of the price update are:
a) Condition types EDI1 and EDI2 must be maintained in the condition schema.
b) The price transfer must be activated in the confirmation control key.
I have configured EDI1 and i can see a different Vendor Price in in INBOUND IDOC Seg E1EDP01 -VPREI AND THE 855 is posted the Application and i see the Order Ack on the PO
T-Code M/06 : Condition Type
Cond. class   B Prices
Calculat.type C Quantity
Cond.category d Confirmed purchase net price/value
Manual entries      B Automatic entry has priority
Manual entries      B Automatic entry has priority
Amount/Percent , Qty Relation ,Item Condition , Deletion check Boxes are Selected
Question 1 ) Acess Sequence is Blank
              2) PricingProc is Blank ( i believe we are using ZM000 PricingProc)
T -Code M/08
Step 90 ( Its the last Step)
Counter     0
Condition Type EDI1     Vendor Price
Print = X
Another question is
1) Do i need to do anything at Vendor Level
After getiing the 855 , if i do an analysis on Pricing ,
I see EDI1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
I Don't see the Vendor Price Any where in PO
I would appreciate if anyone can provide any help
Thanks
Venki
Thanks

Hi Venki,
please check the notes 109273 and 456127.
Please see also the attachment in note 456127.
Could you please check if the condition formula for net price in the
pricing schema is set to 2 in your system. Transaction M/08 ->
select pricing schema (RM0000)-> in line for net price the field
V_T683S-KOFRM (AltCTy) should be set to 2.
Note 456127 Question 23:
23. Question:
Which settings are necessary to ensure that prices are copied from the
ORDRSP to the purchase order item?
Answer:
Consider the attachment of this note. In the attachment, all steps for
standard price schema RM0000 are documented.
Regards,
Edit

Sequence of condition types in MIRO for import P.O

Hi!
In case of import P.O. scenario, while capturing customs duties in MIRO, the sequence of condition types is not as defined in P.O. ( no GR bassed IV, MIRO before MIGO).
For example, sequence defined in P.O :
                                                           1. Basic duty
                                                           2. CVD
                                                           3. Spl. Addl. Cess
                                                           4. E.Cess on CVD
                                                           5. S&H E.Cess on CVD
                                                           6. Customs E.Cess   etc...
While capturing the customs duties in MIRO, after entering the P.O. no, the system should propose the same sequence of condition types as defined above (i.e., P.O). But it is proposing in the following sequence.
                                                           1. S&H E.Cess on CVD
                                                           2. Basic duty
                                                           3. E.Cess on CVD
                                                           4. CVD
                                                           5. Customs E.Cess
                                                           6. Spl. Addl. Cess
The sequence of condtion types defined in pricing procedure is also same as shown in P.O.
Can any one suggest the reason for this issue. Your valid suggestions will be highly appriciated.
Thanks & Regards
Gopi Chand.

Hi VS!
Thanks for the reply.
Actually I have already verified the pricing procedure for this concern and it was not maintained like that. For every condition type, different step with counter zero was mentioned.
10 - 0 - BCD
20 - 0 - CVD
30 - 0 - Ecess on CVD etc..
Even then the problem is coming.
Can you please suggest any other solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Gopi Chand.

Selecting the best Price for a condition type but only for some customers

Hi All,
I have this situation where we have condition type ZPPR (COPY OF PR00) with 5-6 Condtion tables.
in Access sequence for ZPPR, we have Exclusion Indicator set for all the conditiona tables so if first price is found, it doesn't search for others.
Now I have a requirement that we should search for all the condition records and choose the lowest price. But this should happen for only a certain type of customers and not for everybody.
Spefically we have:
1. Contract Price
2. Plant/Material price
Normally, if contract price is found, it doesn't look for Plant/Mat price but we want to offer our customers(some of them) an option where they could choose the lower of the two price. We set both the prices every day based on some inputs.
Regards,
Luke
Edited by: Lukesh Singla on Dec 21, 2011 8:49 PM

Hi Luke,
We have multiple option for this implementation:
Option 1: If possible based on access sequence. Not sure if this is suitable considering you mentioned that ZPPR has 5-6 access sequence.
1) Store Contract price in condition type ZPPR and store Plant / Material Price in new condition type say, ZPPX.
2) Have separate pricing procedure and determine them based on customer type. In first pricing process XXXX01, configure Condition exclusion with the setting that ZPPX should be deactivated if ZPPR is present, condition exclusion procedure D (exclusive) . In second pricing procedure XXXX02, configure condition exclusion with the setting that compare ZPPX and ZPPR and activate best condition type for the customer by using condition exclusion procedure C (Best condition between two exclusion groups ).
Option 2:
1) Copy ZPPR and its access sequence to a new condition type and access sequence say ZPPX without checking exclusion indicator in the access sequence. In the condition type control for condition type ZPPX >> Master data section >> Reference Condition type = ZPPR so that master data records need not be duplicated.
2a) Assign the current procedure to the set of customers which should get the first price. Create a new procedure with condition type ZPPX instead of ZPPR keeping other parameters similar and assign the new procedure to other set of customers who should get the best price.
OR
2b) if 2a is difficult in terms of future maintenance, add condition type ZPPX in the same procedure and create 2 new pricing requirement validating the customer segments and assign them to respective condition type in procedure ZPPR and ZPPX.
3) Maintain condition exclusion for condition type ZPPX with B ( Best condition within Condition type).
Hopefully it helps. Let me know if you need any other help in implementation of the solution.
Regards,
Naveen Aggarwal

Invoice output Condition type not populated for many invoice documents

Hi Guru's
Invoice Out put Condition type for printing not populated in the invoice document. Now We need to insert condition type for many documents to print at a time. We can manually place condition type at document header level individually for every document. But we have many documents to print.
plz advice me how to print all these documents
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ravikanth

Hi Ravi
Just take help from your ABAP team. Record the event in SHDB ask then to get invoice number from excel file and loop the program.
This will be more faster then LSMW.
I am giving you BDC code
report ZBILVF02
       no standard page heading line-size 255.
include bdcrecx1.
start-of-selection.
perform open_group.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMV60A' '0101'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'VBRK-VBELN'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'VBRK-VBELN'
                              '90010310'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPMV60A' '0104'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'VBRK-FKART'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '=SICH'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'VF02'.
perform close_group.
Regards
Vijay

Avoiding derived columns for mapping purposes only

Hi. In 2012 has there been any advancement that would alleviate us from adding a derived column simply for the purpose of mapping an existing var or param to an oledb output column?

Hi DB042189,
According to your description, what you would like to do is directly mapping a variable or parameter to an Output column of a Data Flow Task control without adding a new column through the Derived Column transform. If so, this is not supported in SSIS 2012
currently. I would suggest you submitting a wish at
https://connect.microsoft.com/sql.
Connect site is a connection point between you and Microsoft, and ultimately the larger community. Your feedback enables Microsoft to make software and services the best that they can be, and you can learn about and contribute to exciting projects.
Regards,
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

Condition types in SRM for mapping purposes with backend contracts

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for