Configuration date of Settlement Rule

Hello.
Can you tell me is there any possibilitie to check when was the first (and others) configurations of Settlement Rule for WBS Element in transaction CJ03?
Best regards
Marcin Obukowicz

If the first settlement run has been executed, the field/column 'First Used' would suggest the period/year when the settlement happened.
Else use T Code SE16, enter COBRA execute, enter the object number (PR*) of the WBS and then look at the fields creation on/changed on.
Regards
Sreenivas

Similar Messages

  • Profit Center not getting copied from WBS master data to settlement rule

    Hello,
    I am facing issues during settlement to G/L. From FI side we have set up some validations that the  FI postings shld always carry a Profit Ctr. Now when I am doing settlement to B/S account, the profit ctr from WBS master data gets copied to settlement details and hence on FI posting (Credit line).
    However when I am trying to settle to Expenxse/P&L account this is not happening. The profit Ctr is not getting copied from WBS master data to Settlement details and hence the settlement is not going thru. The profit derived is a dummy profit ctr and not the one on WBS master data.
    I have posted this query on FI forum too but no satisfactory answers.
    Pls let me know, what is the system behaviour....will the prof ctr on WBS master data gets copied on settlement rule details automatically ?
    Sarang

    Which exit do I use in OPSN? any thts or some exit in FI?
    I am on ECC-6.0...
    One thing to mention, the prof ctr is getting copied to settlement rules for Balance sheet account but not for P&L.This is more confusing...
    Sarang

  • Where to configure Account Assignment Category for WBS Settlement Rule?

    Hi,
    I would like to know where is the Account Assignment Category for WBS settlement rule (FXA, CTR, G/L, WBS)  being configured. (SPRO Path)
    Currently when I go to our settlement rule creation screen I can only see WBS and FXA, I need to add MAT (Material)
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Vivian

    Hi Shrikant,
    Do you mean in my CJ02 WBS Settlement Rule creation screen, I cannnot put MAT as account assignment category?
    Does it mean that WBS element CANNOT be settled to material? and we can only settle PM order to material?
    Thanks!
    Regards,
    Vivian

  • Error message - data master internal order settlement rule

    Hi people,
    I'm creating an internal order, and in the settlement rule, i'd like to put a message error when i make a distribuition over 100%. For example, i put 50% in a settlement receiver and 65% in another one, that makes 115%. The system shows a message, but it allows me to save. I need that shows an error message and don't allow me to save.
    Anyone can help me?
    The message that appears is this one:
    Total = 115.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 002/2009
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 115.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 002/2009.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.
    Procedure
    You can ignore this message if you are settling by fixed amounts. The settlement then checks whether the settlement sender has been fully credited.
    Otherwise, correct the percentages for view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) to be able to settle exactly 100% in period 002/2009.
    If these rules are not full settlement rules (settlement type GES), you can switch off the 100% check in the settlement profile. This procedure also suppresses the message in future.
    Note
    If you cannot find any fields where you can enter percentage values, this is probably because the settlement profile is configured to hide them. Switch on percentage settlement in the settlement profile, or use equivalence numbers for your rules, if the project profile allows this.
    Many thanks.

    Hi
    Below is the extract for the 100% Validation check. Please check the bold part. Even if you save the settlement rule with more than 100% at the time of settlement this will be errored.
    dentifier for "100% validation"
    Indicator controlling whether percentages in the settlement rules are checked by the system.
    If you have defined percentage distribution rules for a particular settlement rule, the system checks the total percentage either when you save the settlement rule or if you use the percentage check function.
    Use
    If the indicator is set  The system issues a  warning
    if the total is <> 100%.
    If the indicator is not set The system issues a warning
    if the total is > 100%.
    In both cases, you can ignore the warning and save the settlement rule. However, to be able to run the settlement, you must first correct the settlement rule.  The settlement run itself prevents you from settling more than 100%.
    Note
    The indicator only affects periodic settlement.  In overall settlement, the percentage must always be 100%.
    You can also use this indicator if you are not using percentages for settlement.  If this is the case, you must activate the equivalence numbers.  You then receive a warning that, even if you have entered settlement rules, none of the rules has received an equivalence number (other than zero).

  • Inserting PO and Item fileds in settlement rule in IW31/32/33

    Hi ,
    My requirement is as follows:
    I want to store a PO and PO Item to a CS Order (IW31/32/33) in Settlement rule screen  exclusively.
    I came to know that it is not possible to associate a purchase Order through configuration.
    Plz suggest the possible Enhancement / exits/BADIs or any other methd for inserting a PO and Item field in settlement rule in transaction IW32.

    Hi,
    I am unable to attach the Screen Shot for your refrence, Here SCN is not supporting me .
    So i have send you the Code:
    I created ztable name ZPM_TABLE
    with fields ZEBELN
                      ZEQUNR
                      ZTPLNR
    In which PO No Equipment No and Functional Location Data is stored..
    Then in Exit IWOC0003..
    I written Code to fetch the Po Vendor Details  for that particular Equipment No or Functional Location Value as follows :
    Please Note :
    In My Code I have used Submit Program Name to get the Po Item Values :
    Code as Follows:
    { if sy-tcode eq 'IW21' or
       sy-tcode eq  'IW31'.
    tables : ekko,
             lfa1,
             adrc,
             t005u,
             t005t,
             zpm_table.
    data : wa_lfa1 like lfa1 occurs 0 with header line,
           it_lfa1 like lfa1 occurs 0 with header line,
           wa_popup like zpm_table occurs 0 with header line,
           it_ekko like ekko occurs 0 with header line,
           wa_adrc like adrc occurs 0 with header line,
           po_serv type zpo_service1 with header line.
          it_ser  type zpo_service1 with header line.
    *data : text_val type string.
    data : begin of it_popup occurs 0,
           po_no like ekko-ebeln,
           po_no1 like ekko-ebeln,
           lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
           name1 like lfa1-name1,
           mobile like lfa1-telf2,
           street1 like adrc-str_suppl1,
           street2 like adrc-str_suppl2,
           street like adrc-street,
           pin    like  adrc-post_code1,
           tel    like adrc-tel_number,
           fax    like adrc-fax_number,
           ext    like adrc-tel_extens,
           country like  t005t-landx,
           po_text(100) type c,
           end of it_popup.
    data : begin of it_ser occurs 0,
          extrow type string,
          SRVPOS type string,
          KTEXT1 type string,
           menge  type esll-menge ,
           meins  type esll-meins,
           netwr  type esll-netwr,
           end of it_ser.
    data : scrn_popup like it_popup occurs 0 with header line.
    data: po type string,
           text_val type string,
          ven_add type string,
          ven_no type string,
          ven_name type string,
           antwort(1) type c,
           answer(1) type c,
           choise type sy-tabix,
          text1 type  string.
    data: l_answer like sy-input.
    if i_equnr  is not initial.                           "here I_equnr is the Equipment No which flows in the Screen .
      select * from zpm_table into
               corresponding fields of table wa_popup
               where zequnr = i_equnr.
    elseif  i_equnr is not initial and i_tplnr  is not initial. "here I_tplnr is the FL No which flows in the Screen .
      clear : wa_popup.
      select * from zpm_table into
               corresponding fields of table wa_popup
               where zequnr = i_equnr and
                     ztplnr = i_tplnr.
    elseif i_tplnr is not initial.
      clear : wa_popup.
      select * from zpm_table into
               corresponding fields of table wa_popup
               where ztplnr = i_tplnr.
    endif.
    if wa_popup[] is not initial.
      read table wa_popup.
      select ebeln lifnr from ekko
        into corresponding fields of table it_ekko
        where ebeln = wa_popup-zebeln.
      if it_ekko[] is not initial.
        select * from lfa1 into
          corresponding fields of table wa_lfa1
          for all entries in it_ekko
          where lifnr = it_ekko-lifnr.
      endif.
    *endloop.
      loop at wa_lfa1 . "into it_lfa1 WITH TABLE KEY lifnr = it_ekko-lifnr.
        select * from adrc into
          corresponding fields of table wa_adrc
          where addrnumber = wa_lfa1-adrnr.
        data:wa_t005u type t005u occurs 0 with header line.
        select * from t005u into
              corresponding fields of table wa_t005u
                      where spras = 'EN'
                      and land1 = wa_adrc-country
                      and bland = wa_adrc-region.
        data:wa_t005t type t005t occurs 0 with header line.
        select * from t005t into
           corresponding fields of table wa_t005t
                    where spras = 'EN'
                    and land1 = wa_adrc-country.
        it_popup-po_no = wa_popup-zebeln.
        it_popup-lifnr  = wa_lfa1-lifnr.
        it_popup-name1  = wa_lfa1-name1.
        it_popup-mobile  = wa_lfa1-telf2.
        read table wa_adrc index 1.
        it_popup-street1 = wa_adrc-str_suppl1.
        it_popup-street2 = wa_adrc-str_suppl2.
        it_popup-street  = wa_adrc-street.
        it_popup-pin     =  wa_adrc-post_code1.
        it_popup-tel     = wa_adrc-tel_number.
        it_popup-fax     = wa_adrc-fax_number.
        it_popup-ext     = wa_adrc-tel_extens.
        it_popup-country = wa_t005t-landx.
        append it_popup.
      endloop.
      text1 =  'This Equip/Func.Location is Maintained or Service is undertaken by'.
      concatenate  'Vendor No      :  ' it_popup-lifnr
                   into ven_no  .
      concatenate  'Vendor Name   :   ' it_popup-name1
                   into ven_name  .
      concatenate it_popup-street1
                  it_popup-street2
                  it_popup-street
                  it_popup-pin
                  it_popup-country
                 'Mob:' it_popup-mobile
                 'Tel:' it_popup-tel '-' it_popup-ext
                      into ven_add  separated by space.
      concatenate  'Please Refer this PO No. :   ' it_popup-po_no
                   into po  .
    message 'Warning!!!' type 'I'.
      Function Module for Pop Up *
      call function 'POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_WITH_MESSAGE'
      exporting
    DEFAULTOPTION = 'Y'
       diagnosetext1 = text1
       diagnosetext2 = ven_no
       diagnosetext3 = ven_name
       textline1 = ven_add
       textline2 = po
       titel = 'Warning!!!'
    START_COLUMN = 25
    START_ROW = 6
        cancel_display = 'X'
       importing
        answer =  antwort.
      " Area for option Yes or No "" .  
      if antwort = 'J'.
        if it_popup-po_no is not initial.                      " Please Note here im checking for PO No
          export it_popup-po_no to memory id 'Memo1'.  "Po No is exported to another Program there i coded for Po items
          submit zpm_po_services and return.
        endif.
      else.
    *call TRANSACTION 'iw21'.
        call transaction 'IW21' and skip first screen.
      endif.
    endif. " End of  Total itab value/
    else.
    exit.
    endif.     }
    This is the Code for zpm_po_services
    For any Clarification Revert Back..
    With Regards,
    Vinu.R

  • BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE settlement rule for profitability segment

    I am trying to create internal orders using BAPI_INTERNALORDER_CREATE, in the Settlement rules data I want to settle to profitability segment but I can't find away to do this. I can settle to other orders, cost centers and WBS elements but not PSG.
    Are you guys aware of any way I cant do this. How can I derive profitability segment from PNL? is there other functions that will help do this?
    Thank you very much
    Omar

    Yes that field is enabled for settling from settlement profile configuration. The other enabled fields like order, cost centers and profit centers are available.
    I think the BAPI is missing this functionality since the profitability segment has to be derived from other characteristics like PNL.
    Are you guys aware of any functions that do the derivation of the profitability segment given PNL for example?
    In this case where the BAPI is missing some key function what is the best way forward?
    Thanks very much
    Omar

  • Settlement rule does not exists in order number.

    Hi All,
    I have been recieving a error while trying to save the Production order. The error reads as "Settlement rule does not exixts in order". But fact is that order has settlement rule. Also there is a default setting done in order type settlement profile because of which settlement rule is created automatically.
    Now there is a way around. We calculate cost manually and then we go to settlement rule and check for error. Once we do so the order is good to save.
    But we are not able to save it automaticaaly after release. This issue occurs when we try to release the order and then after releasing the order we try to save it.
    Please help us on this issue.

    Hi Prabhakar,
    Thanks for your input. But the said setting was already done while implementation. All the material except this material has the issue. We are able to realease the order properly for the material except this one. And since go live we are using this material for first time.
    We did a work around. We copied this material and recreated a new material with reviced part number. That one is working fine in lower client. We have now no idea how could one material all the same data like material master and routing and BOM and work centers can work properly whicle failing for other.
    We are trying to debug this will let you all know if we find the solution. Till then if you all have any idea any prior experience, please let me know.

  • AUC and settlement rule mismatch.

    Hi,
    We have created many AUCs while uploading initial data at the time of go-live by posting JVs on WBSE and then performing the settlement. Now due to some currency issues we have reversed all settlements, and then Asset accounting person has resetted the asset register.
    now when I am trying to create AUC from CJ20N, system creates AUC and provides the number. but this newly generated AUC number is not matching with the AUC in settlement rule. I can't delete the old settlement rule as the settlement performed on that. as well as I am not able to add new AUC in settlement rule.
    Please let me know if there is any program / tcode which can remove this inconsistency. or is there any other procedure to make it streamline.
    Please help.
    Regards,
    Nilesh.

    Hi,
    There is no error message in this case.
    The scenario is like:
    I have one WBSE and AUC is created for this WBS. for example AUC number is 1. the WBSE is released and some cost has incurred on it. during periodic settlement the cost is settled on the AUC.
    Now the Client FICO team observed that the asset accounting is wrong due to currency conversion problem, so FICO team decided to reset the asset register and upload the entire master with new corrections. this will reset the AUCs as well.
    so i reversed the settlement done on AUC and got the cost back on WBSE.
    FICO team has resetted the asset register and all AUCs got deleted.
    Now the issue is: WBSE is having AUC #1 in settlement rule which can not be deleted as settlement is carried out on this rule.
    But when I create new AUC for WBS it is being created as some different number, (lets say #7) so even if now I run settlement the settlement will be done on AUC #1 insted of #7 even though #1 belongs to some other WBSE now in new scenario.
    I hope I have clearly mentioned the issue.
    Regards,
    Nilesh

  • Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

    Hi,
    I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
    Regards,
    DPil

    Hi,
    It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
    Diagnosis
    WBS element  is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
    System Response
    The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
    Procedure
    Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
    But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

  • Capital Project Settlement Rule for lower WBS

    Hello,
    At my present client, for Investment projects the client want to settle top level WBS to AUC and capitalise it. So ideally the cost from lower level WBS should flow to top WBS. I am using substitution to remove investment profile from lower WBS.My concern is how do I auto populate the settlement rule for lower WBS to top WBS. I am aware about settlement strategy and OSS note 211324 (however dont want to implement this note)
    The appraoch I am looking for is using "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE' BAdI . However this BADI calls for strategy and I could not maintain the required strategy (settlement to top WBS). Is there some BADI/Function module available which can be called for updating the settlement rules on lower WBS while saving or Release ? Can I make use of exits in Substitution?
    Please let me know your opinions.
    Thanks
    Sarang

    Thanks Virendra. I agrree the only approach is development. But I need to give inputs to my developer.
    We tried with BADI "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE" but it didnt work as it calls strategy in configuration.
    So I am checking for some other options for e.g "WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE" which is called during save or Fn modules K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_FILL or K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE which I can use. This is a client requirement to create AUC only at top level n all cost to be rolled up to superior WBS n then settle to AUC.
    The other option I was thinking is of using exits thru substitution.
    What will be the best approach?
    Thanks
    Sarang

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

    Hi,
    When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
    But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
    Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                    Yes/No
    1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
           Error when processing Production order
          Error when processing Production order
          Message no. V1380
          Diagnosis
            A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the  following meanings:
    1 = External block,  2 = General error,  3 = Insufficient data for the interface,  4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued.  Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
    2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
    "Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
    We are using the requierement class with below details:
    Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
    AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
    Settlement profile contain:
    Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
    If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
    The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
    Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
    Let me know if you need any further details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ADI

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

  • Settlement rule for Asset Under Construction not automatically generated.

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on a capital project scenario where in i configured the SAP IM and SAP PS module. i am able to create AUC at the WBS level on project release,but i am not able to generate the settlement rule for AUC automatically.
    Please suggest as to what i am missing to generate settlement rule for AUC automatically.
    Thanks,
    shiv

    i think for automatically AUC to be generated, u need to create investment profile in OITA in that u have to tick mange AUC in investment measure. & select settlement for summary settlement.
    This investment profile u need to specify in Project Profile OPSA.
    do this setting & let me know whts happen?
    ok best of luck.
    Regards,
    ANSAR

  • Error while creating settlement rule

    We are trying to create a Settlement Rule for a Production Order for material 900010001 with following details:
    Cat:MAT
    Settlement Receiver:900010001
    % :100
    Settlement Type:FUL
    System is giving an error msg. no.KD063 'Distribution rule for an Article can only be created automatically'.
    Can anyone help us in analysing the same.
    We want that while creating a Production Order Settlement Rule shall be created by default for Cat:MAT & Settlement Receiver:900010001 (Material of Production Order).Can anyone guide us how the same can be achieved.
    With Rgds.,
    Rakesh Kumar

    Hi..
    please try this....Goto KSR2_VBP.
    THere are two strategies.. 01 and 02.
    01 for manual creation of settlement rules
    02 for auto creation..
    first check whether 01 and 02 are in your plant.
    Sales and distrib....basic functions......auto gen. of settlement rules.......
    here you ll find two activities.
    (1)maintaining the settlement strategies and
    (2)activating one among them.
    If you activate 02, your problem will be solved..
    Also check this..
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a9/ab777d414111d182b10000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    The settlement profile is to be defined for thee particular Order Type to generate automatically.
    Define Production Order Type in OPJH
    Under Cost controlling check the settlement profile .
    If not create the same in OPJH.
    Settlement Profile: Create settlement profile - SPRO > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product cost by Order > Period End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile
    Enter Settlement profile from OPJH or Choose one for production order
    and configure Settlement profile. Indicators
    with wishes
    karthick.

  • Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile.  I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
    On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
    I have posted costs to the WBS element.
    When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
    However, (now my problem)
    When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank.  There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element.  There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
    Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error.  One further  point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA"  GL Account Document.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ian

    hi,
    Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
    Regards
    Ricky

Maybe you are looking for

  • I can't get my iMac (mid 2011) to connect to my tv using a mini dvi to hdmi

    How do I get my iMac to connect to a toshiba tv using a minidvi to hdmi cable?

  • Backup and external drive

    Hi I'm using an external drive for time machine but when T/M starts backing I can not do any thing with the computer until it has finished, and ideas? Ta

  • Solution on DTD memory model

    Hi All, I'm trying to find the state of the industry regarding availability of solutions that provide DDT memory models. Can someone suggest if there are a few chat forums that I can post the question on. Regards, AR

  • Sharing with my desktop Windows XP PC

    I'm able to view and access folders and files of my desktop PC from my Macbook. However when I try to play a song file that's on my desktop from my Macbook, the file is transferred. I don't want it transferred, I only want to play the file from my de

  • Changing connection pool

    I have the three layers created in the RPD (physical, business, presentation). Now I have to point to another db with the same physical table structure. When I change the ODBC definition to point to another DB, I receive errors in Oracle because the