Configuration vendor evaluation

Dear MM consultants
I am facing problem in configuration of vendor evaluation.
In Vendor evaluation
1) define weighing key i.e-1- equal weighting, 2 - unequal weighting
2)define criteria . here I created 1-price, 2-quality, 3- delivery, 4-service
In criteria "price" I created subcriteria price level & the subcriteria no 1 & scoring method is 4.In criteria quality I created three subcriteria 1)GR INSPECTION
2) COMplaint/rejection, 3)audit & the scoring method is 7,8,9. In delivery criteria the subcriteria is 1-on time delivery.& the scoring method is "B".& FOR SERVICE CRITERIA 1) SAFTY & SCORING METHOD i HAVE NOT selected because I have taken "no automatic determination".
in pur organisation data for vendor evaluation when i click on subcriteria icon I put "1" in weighing field.when I click on weighting I entered weighting key 1& 2 for price, quality, delivery, service.& when i click in point score of automatic criteriaI I copied  from standard system which has been maintained in sap system.AFTER DOING ALL THE THINGS WHEN i USED t-CODE ME61 THE MESSAGE COMESweighting key for purchase organisation does not exist.PLEASE SOLVE MY PROBLEM TODAY EVENING.
THANKING YOU
CHITTARANJAN

goto define pur org data for vendor evaluation and select oyur pur org and hit the weighting button at the left and maintin the weighting key for all your criteria here

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation steps

    Hi,
    We are using ECC 6.0 with single purchasing organisation.
    Can anybody send the steps to configure Vendor Evaluation settings and report.
    regards,

    Hi
    Kindly refer the link for detailed vendor evaluation.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Thanks

  • Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

    Dear all,
    I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
    For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
    Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
    Vendor XYZ
    Material ABC
    For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
    For 2010 Maket price 8.2  Effective price 8.5
    Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
    Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
    Vendor XYZ
    Material DEF
    For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
    For 2010 Maket price 20  Effective price 22
    Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
    When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
    5     Price behavior     5.0     10
    5     Price behavior     10.0     15
    5     Price behavior     20.0     20
    5     Price behavior     50.0     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0     10
    5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
    5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
    5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
    Pls help me resolve the issue
    Regards.
    Milind Dugade

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

    Please can any one update on it.
    Dear Friends.
    I have configured vendor evaluation in following  way .
    1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
                   Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense  that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    Regards,
    MAhesh
    Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

    Hi Mahesh,
    the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
    also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
    Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
    Vendor Evaluation Process
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Vendor Evaluation Configuration

    Configuring the vendor evaluation there is no any subcriteria under "delivery" for early delivery that can be evaluated, I know we can create subcriteria, however I do not know how the new subcriteria will be evaluated if there is no any "scoring method" for "early delivery" so I would like to know how I can set up a new method or is even possible to do it , or how this work please.
    Thanks
    Nelly Reguera

    Dear MK,
    The automatic quality score in standard is get from QM inspection lot result or audit lot, you have two option, if the quality need to be consider , you can also maintain the quality criteria with manually enter the value (so need extra work), but if the percentage of the quality is not significant you can ignore it, it depends on your business need , you can discuss with your  vendor cataloger for this.But ,from mention that all defects materials is send back to vendor, so it means all goods will received in Good quality to your warehouse. So it means all quality will be Good (100 point) and if you enter it in quality then it no use , since all the value will be the same, so you can ignore the quality criteria.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Dear Gurus,
    Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
    Follow the bellow steps:
    1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
    Select…………….Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
    2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
    Price,
    Quality,
    Delivery,
    Service
    For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
    Criteria Sub-Criteria
    Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
    Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
    Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
    Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
    3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
    4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
    5. ME61
    With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
    Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Regards,

  • Performance in Vendor Evaluation (ME61)

    Hi, I configured a new subcriteria (Complaints) in the Quality criteria, and after my job of Vendor Evaluation decreased the performance.
    Is there any procedure to increase the performance?
    Regards,
    Anna Pinheiro

    Dear Sachin,
    You can go to SPROMM-Purchasing-Vendor evaluationMaintain P.Organization data .
    Then select the P.Org , then go to point score for automatic criteria.
    You also can maintain the smoothing factor , min delv.var,etc, Just double click(go to detail) when you select the p.org.
    The percentage score is define as per business req.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Vendor evaluation  URGENT

    While using the t- code ME61 for Vendor Evaluation I am getting an error that Purchasing organization data is incomplete Pls. Help me
    regards

    Hi
    Vendor evaluations done at Purchase organization level.You have to define the control parameters at Purchase organization level.
    Path for configuring the Vendor eveluation:
    <b>SPRO> MM> Purchasing --> Vendor eveluation --> Define Purchase organization data for Vendor eveluation.</b>
    Here you have to enter your purcvhase organization and define the control parameters like  Best score,Applicability period etc.
    If you want std configuration, please copy std Purchase org (1000) settings to your purchase organization by selecting copy as.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

    Dear Folks,
    Customer requirement is to see subcriterion level scores of Vendor
    Evaluation according to material, Material group wise. But the
    datasource provided by SAP is providing the data according to
    Purchasing Organisation level and Vendor level (0MM_PUR_VE_01).Is it
    Possible to break the scores according to material group and material
    as TC in r/3: ME6B provides ranking based on Main Criterion level
    scores. If possible, what is the logic?
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi Anil,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    But Customer requires vendor evaluation data through Automatic route.
    0MM_PUR_VE_02 caters to semi-automatic data which needs to be configured in r/3, and customer doesn't want to do that. Is there any other solution.

  • MATERIAL & VENDOR EVALUTION

    CAN ANY BODY DONE MATERIAL & VENDOR  EVALUTION  LIKE MY SCENARIO IS  I  CONFIGURED 3 SELECTED  AS A  ACCEPTED ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION AND  ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY AND REJECTED   I DONE  QUALITY SCORE  ACCEPTED 100 ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION 70 ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY 30 REJECTED 1
    IN CONFIGURATION DEFINITION OF QUALITY SCORE CLASS LIMIT I ALSO CONFIGURED  BUT WHAT IS THE MEAN OF EXPONENTIAL AND EQUIDISTANT IF I ASSIGN MY QUALITY SCORE  USAGE INDICATOR  ANYTHING WILL HAPPEN OR WE CAN AND I ALSO  TRIED ASSIGNED QUALITY SCORE CLASSES  FOR  INFO STRUCTURE SYSTEM NOT ALLOWED
    FINALLY HOW  I WILL ASSIGN  MY QUALITY SCORE TO MATERIAL ANALYSIS AND VENDOR ANALYSIS KINDLY GUIDE ME IF ANY BODY DONE THIS  SCENARIO.

    I hope you would have wrote it readable & formatted in good sentence...........
    Nevertheless.......
    As per SAP std settings....................
    Both uniform and exponentially weighted classifications are predefined in the standard system. The uniform classification is proposed as the default.
    Equidistant is uniform one ...uni formally increasing where as Exponential score is exponentially which is predefined.
    Now Its only "statistics" & not "Evaluation" info structure you can assign here............
    Warning: You cannot change classifications that have already been used! First, you must delete the data contents in the related information structures. You can then change the classification. Finally, you must update the information structures to provide them with data entries, provided that the original documents have not already been archived.

  • Vendor Evaluation formula

    Dear All,
                   Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
    I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
    Price : 30%
    Quality: 50%
    Delivery : 20%
    i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
    Regards
    Kumar.

    Hi,
    please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
    COIN error during MB1A transaction code
    this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
    agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Regarding vendor evaluation

    Hello Gurus,
    Can any one tell me about the vendor evaluation.
    What is the transaction code for vendor evaluation?
    Reg/ Shankar G

    Hi shankar,
    please go through this: step by step guide
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Please check whether you concidered all these points in your configuration
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97dda414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97f3e414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
    Regards,
    Hareesha

  • Price level in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I have created 1st PO with price 50 and checked the ME63, system showed score for price level as 40. Then I made another PO with price 55 and checked ME63, system displayed the same score 40,
    While there is change in price of 10 %, so I was expecting score of 10 .
    Can anyone explain about this.

    Hi,
    Following is the calculation procedure for
    1) Price Level -
    If you have maintained market price for the material, the system checks vendor's price level with the market price, otherwise it compares the vendor's price with average price of material by all vendors. Then the price variance is calculated in percentage. The score is awarded for this price variance as per settings in your system configuration. This process is repeated for all the materials supplied by the vendor. The overall score is the average of all these scores.
    2) Price Behaviour -
    System checks market price / average price of the material for last year as well as for current year. System calculates the percentage change for the market price. System repeats this procedure for price of material by vendor. Then system compares these two values & calculates percentage variance. The score is awarded for this variance as per system configuration. The overall score is the average of all these scores of the materials.
    3)Online Delivry statistics -
    System calculates the difference between scheduled delivery date in PO & actual delivery date & calculates the percentage variance. The score is awarded as per settings in system configuration. This process is repeated for each P.O. & overall score is average of all these values.
    Hope the answer is helpfull. For more details, you can avail online help at site http//:help.sap.com on subject Vendor Evaluation.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • Weighting Key in Vendor Evaluation

    Hi all,
    Is there any configuration by which the weighting key is defaulted?
    My client uses only one weighting key and whenever a vendor evaluation is run, they want the weighting key to be autopopulated.
    FYI
    No customization. Is this possible only through normal SAP configuration?
    Thanks

    Generally last time used weighting key will defult to ME61 but if not then you can create screen variant using SHD0 transaction.
    Go to SHD0 adn type tcode ME61 and in tran variant type e.g. ZME61
    and then hit create button
    go through the transaction, every step popup will come
    here just enter
    and when you see the weighting key popup screen here check the w. content and output only check box (the value of weighting key should be populated)
    then hit exit and save
    it will ask object
    enter the object and save
    then from main screen
    hit GOTO from header and click on create variant transaction and enter the variant transction code
    e.g. ZME61 and save
    give this to user
    systen will defualt the weighting key
    reward the points

  • Smoothing factor in Vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I'm not able to understand the math underneath the "smoothing factor" used in vendor evaluation. Could someone throw some light in this?
    thanks!

    Hi
    A score for a new goods receipt or the scores for a new service will change the existing scores for the current month.
    The new individual score does not have the same significance as the previous composite score, because the latter was calculated from a number of individual scores. For this reason, the new individual score is given a lower weighting (that is to say, it is smoothed).
    In carrying out this process, the system applies the relevant smoothing factors that you have defined for each individual score in Customising.
    OMGL is the transaction to configure smoothing factor.
    hope it helps.
    regards
    Srinivas

Maybe you are looking for

  • Issue when trying to upgrade FB 4.7 to AIRDSK 3.6

    Hi, I'm desperately trying to upgrade FB 4.7 to AIRSDK 3.6 since 3 weeks. I've followed the various solutions found on forums and the various processes displayed by the "helpx.adobe.com" pages, but none of them works. So please, if a member of Adobe

  • ActionScript 2 need to show graphic when doors open

    I had this working at one time but having a problem with adding a graphic display when the door starts to open. A button initiates the door to open, here is the script. the second part is where it fails, anyone help please. Can send fla if needed on

  • Url IWeb, mobileme

    Hola, tengo una duda, he hecho una pagina con Iweb y la he publicado en mobileme redireccionando esta a mi propio dominio, al busca la pagina me la busca poniendo mi dominio que es www.dinoaldolor.com, pero en la url me pone la dirección donde se alo

  • Facing issue with adding systems in SMSY - solution manager

    Hi all,     We are facing an issue with the solution manager in tcode smsy. When i create a system in the corresponding component say ECC with product version ECC6.0.The next screen shows that the <SID> has been added successfully. But when i navigat

  • Why is my USB Drive Always Labeled in Capital Letters?

    I have a SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16 GB USB Drive, and when ever I'm on any Mac or PC, it's always in capital letters. Name goes from "SanDisk USB" to "SANDISK USB". Is there anyway to enable it to label in lower case letters?