Configure OAS with dataguard for high availibility

Hi,
We use oracle application server to connect to 10g database. This prod db has a physical standby db. I am trying to do a failover test where I make the physical standby as primary and connect to that db from our application.
I change the dads.conf file to point to the physical db. but I get ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress Error-Code:1033 Error TimeStamp:Fri, 8 May 2009 21:57:55 GMT
but this physical db is up & open and in read write stage.
The db name is prod and prod_stby. is this because of the different names ??

Hello,
I think you need to keep the infrastructure database names the same. Have you considered using the failover capabilities within 10gAS for your application servers? This is different from
Data Guard standby database option. Here is a good Metalink note on how to setup and configure 10g Application Server failover:
Understanding OracleAS 10g High Availability - A Roadmap- Metalink Note #412159.1
Cheers,
Ben

Similar Messages

  • Best practice for highly available management / publishing servers

    I am testing a highly available appv 5.0 environment, which will deploy appv packages to a Xenapp farm.  I have two SQL 2012 servers configured as an availability group for the backend, and two publishing / management servers for the front end. 
    What is the best practice to configure the publishing / management servers for high availability?  Should I configure them as an NLB cluster, which I have tested and does seem to work, or should I just use the GPO to configure the clients to use both
    publishing servers, which I have also tested and appears to work?
    Thanks,
    Patrick Sullivan

    In App-V 5.0 the Management and Publishing Servers are hosted in IIS, so use the same approach for HA as you would any web application.
    If NLB is all that's available to you, then use that; otherwise I would recommend a proper load balancing solution such as Citrix NetScaler or KEMP LoadManager.
    Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" or "Vote as Helpful" on the post that answers your question (or click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually
    answer your question). This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
    This forum post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of my employer, Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.
    Twitter:
    @stealthpuppy | Blog:
    stealthpuppy.com |
    The Definitive Guide to Delivering Microsoft Office with App-V

  • ASM with regard to High Availability

    Hi at all!
    I try to figure out what effects the use of ASM for my system has, particularly with regard to High Availability. I have a database on a RAID-5 Server, does it make sense to implement ASM for this system? I know, ASM has other effects, regarding the i/o and rebalancing but would it be less fault-prone too? Why? Do you have any Whitepaper-suggestion for me? The FAQ-Link from the 'Welcome to the Automatic Storage Management (ASM) Forum!'-Topic is broken, there is no document 370915.1 in metalink ...
    greetings

    Hello,
    Not sure if you are using a clustered enviroment, but even when using single instance ASM it is usefull to use. You can on the fly add disks, you don't need to worry about anymore about where you put your datafiles for spreading as this is done.
    You can use to let your storage system arange the failover like RAID5, but you can also use ASM failure groups for this feature. In case one failure group has an issue it will continue to work and use the correct failure group.
    I believe managing your environment will be much easier.
    check out :
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/asm/index.html
    Good luck,
    B de CockBuning
    www.rachelp.nl

  • Hardware Sizing for high Availability system

    Hi,
    I have to perform Hardware sizing for high Availability system for a fresh installation and I am quite new to this area.
    It will be a User based sizing.
    Total user count 150. 
    105 - Info-consumer Users
    40 - Executive Users
    05 - Expert Users
    Can you please let me know what will be the best approch and what are the factors have to consider to perform the hardware sizing for high Availability system
    Your support will be appriciated.
    Regards,
    Basis

    Hi Sebastian,
    Thanks for your response. Yes, I am going through the doc.
    Solution will be BW 7.4 on HANA. If you can give me what are the factors I have to consider will be very helpfull for me.
    I already did sizing for standalone installation, but client is looking for Hardware Sizing for high availability system.
    Regards,
    Basis

  • How to configure two TMG 2010 Standard Edition for High Availability

    I've classic scenario.
    TMG2010 as Edge Firewall, with two NICs, one from ISP and the other for LAN.
    I've standard edition, and i want to setup two TMG2010.
    Can i create some high availability with these two tmg2010 in some way??
    maybe some NLB?? to share their internal IP and Public IP?
    in case that TMG01 fails, the services to be offered by TMG02?
    Regards
    Lasandro Lopez

    Hi,
    Thank you for your post here.
    I do not think it is  a good idea.
    Please refer to the article below:
    http://www.experts-exchange.com/Microsoft/Windows_Security/Q_28014001.html
    Best Regards
    Quan Gu

  • Best practice for High availability design, HSRP

    Hi,
    I am planning to create High Availability for LAN to WAN connectivity.
    But I want to know your opinion about the best way how to do this. I googled for a solution/best way how to do this, but I didn't found in my opinion right answer.
    The situation:
    I have 2 3945E Routers and 2 3560 switches. The design that I am planning to implement is below.
    The main goal is to have redundant connection, whatever one of the devices will fail. For example, if the R1 will fail, R2 should become active, if the SW1 will fail, the SW2 will take care about reachability and vice versa. The router 1 should be preferred always, if the link to ISP isn't down, because of greater bandwidth. So why am I drown 2 connections to 2 separate switches. If the SW1 will fail, I will still have a connection to WAN using R1 router.
    The Router interface should be configured with sub interfaces (preferred over secondary IP address of interface), because more than 10 subnets will be assigned to the LAN segment. The routers have 4 Gi ports.
    HSRP must be enabled on LAN side, because PC's on LAN must have redundant def. getaway.
    So, the question is - what is the best and preferred way to do this?
    In my opinion, I should use BVI and combine R1 routers 2 interfaces in to logical one and do the same for the R2.
    Next, turn the router in to L3 switch using IRB and then configure HSRP.
    What would be your preferred way to do this?

    Hi Audrius,
    I would suggest you to go with HSRP. GLBP you will use where you want load balance.
    I think the connectivity between your Routers (3945) and switches (3560) is gigabit connection which is high speed. So keep one physical link from your switches to each router and do HSRP on those router physical interfaces.
    In this way you will have high availability like if R1 fails then R2 will take over.
    Regarding the config see the below which I have for one of my Customer DC.
    ACTIVE:
    track 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 line-protocol
    track 2 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 line-protocol
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    ip address 10.10.10.12 255.255.255.0
    ip nat inside
    ip virtual-reassembly
    duplex full
    speed 100
    standby use-bia scope interface
    standby 0 ip 10.10.10.10
    standby 0 priority 110
    standby 0 preempt
    standby 0 authentication peter2mo
    standby 0 track 1 decrement 30
    standby 0 track 2 decrement 30
    STANDBY:
    track 1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 line-protocol
    interface GigabitEthernet0/1
    ip address 10.10.10.11 255.255.255.0
    ip nat inside
    ip virtual-reassembly
    duplex full
    speed 100
    standby use-bia scope interface
    standby 0 ip 10.10.10.10
    standby 0 priority 90
    standby 0 authentication peter2mo
    standby 0 track 1 decrement 30
    Please rate the helpfull posts.
    Regards,
    Naidu.

  • Need to add a second weblogic server for high availability

    I have a weblogic 10.3.3 server with forms and reports 11.1.1.3.
    I have an adminServer, WLS_FORMS and WLS_REPORTS managed servers setup.
    This was setup with the wizard, so the WLS_FORMS is in the cluster_forms cluster group and WLS_REPORTS in the cluster_reports group.
    I now need to add a second server with forms and reports also to act as one big server and provide high availability and load balancing.
    How do I achieve thsi, is there a wizard that will do this?
    The two servers are setup in exactly the same way, with the same versions of Weblogic and Forms and Reports.
    Thanks in advance.

    I do not know "reports 11.1.1.3" application, but from your description this application is already targeted on a clustered configuration.
    So it should be sufficient to add 2 new instances in the WebLogic domain "WLS_FORMS_2", "WLS_REPORTS_2", include them into the existing clusters and add a load balancer (like apache + wleblogic-plugin) that will balance requests on instances.
    I never heard of wizards to create such clustered environments. However it is not hard to do:
    1- Install binaries on the new machine
    2- Create the domain configuration directory on the new machine using config.sh wizard in the same way you have aleady done with the first machine.
    In this step you can create a clone of the existing domain, but it is enough to create a domain with the same name and the same admin instance.
    Instead of using config.sh, you can also copy the domain directory from the existing machine and change diretories in scripts if needed.
    The domain configuration is needed only to find the binaries, the basic domain files common to all installations, and to allow startup scripts (see point 4-) to connect to the admin and download the domain/instance configuration.
    3- Configure the new instances on the existing WebLogic console
    4- Create startup scripts for "WLS_FORMS_2", "WLS_REPORTS_2" on the second machine
    Bye
    Mariano

  • Configure PO document type for "High sea Sale"

    Dear sir,
    Pl. tell me step by step how can i configure new Document type of Purchase order for "High sea Sale" business senerio without GR.
    Thanks/
    Anurag

    Hi,
    In normal case, when you do GR w.r.t. a Normal PO then system updates Stock Quantity as well as Stock Value of Material.
    But in case of High Seas PO, you don't want GR to happen, you want to carry out LIV directly based on PO. So in this case there won't be Stock Quantity updation as well as Stock Value updation i.e. Expense Account will get psted during LIV against Vendor Account. So your High Seas PO should be account assigned PO.
    So to achieve this, create a separate document type for High Seas PO with allowed Item Category as Blank" i.e. Standard.
    Path: - SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Define Document Types
    OME9 - Create an Account Assignment Category as "Z" (High Seas PO) by copying "K" and in the detailed screen of the same deactivate "Goods Receipt" indicator.
    Now create PO with this Document Type and Account Assignment Category "Z" and check under "Delivery" Tab Page, "Goods Receipt" indicator will be deactivated that means GR not required for this PO.

  • User experience question for High Availability

    Hi Experters,
    Not sure whether this is right forum to post this message.
    If anybody has already captured user experience for the failover environment, will appreciate their help on this. I will give overview of environment. Using PowerHA for ASCS/SCS failover, ORACLE Data Guard for Database failover.
    Trying to capture user experience for the failover environment
    if ASCS/SCS fail,
    App Server Fail (using F5 Load Balancer which should reroute, unless all app server fail),
    Database fail
    with following cases:
    1. User logged in, NO ACTIVITY. I believe NO IMPACT either ASCS/SCS fail or DB fail or App Server fail.
    2. User logged in and run a transaction before failover.
         What will happen in case of ASCS / SCS
         What will happen in case of DB failover
       and  what will happen in case of App server fail (NO High Availability, only redundant app servers.      MAX 4 app servers for each component)
    3. User logged in and run a transaction during failover.
       What will happen in case of ASCS / SCS
         What will happen in case of DB failover
       and  what will happen in case of App server fail (NO High Availability, only redundant app servers.      MAX 4 app servers for each component)
    Not sure which one possible or not. Some case thinking system will hang need to refresh. Some case hour glass and then come back once failover complete. and some case session closed completely.
    Thanks for your time and god bless the knowledge you have.
    Saroj

    just try to answer as much as I can (guess)
    > 1. User logged in, NO ACTIVITY. I believe NO IMPACT either ASCS/SCS fail or DB fail or App Server fail.
    DB failed and SCS failed won't have any impact to enduser, but if app server failed, the user session will lost, user will see a pop up error message at their SAPGUI.
    > 2. User logged in and run a transaction before failover.
    >      What will happen in case of ASCS / SCS
    user wont'be effected during failover if user is doing nothing but idle (replica enqueue is working before failover)
    >      What will happen in case of DB failover
    App server won't be able to do much thing but it's work processes into reonnecting status. it should resume (reconnect to DB) when failover is compoleted. So user should be able to continue the sessions.
    >    and  what will happen in case of App server fail (NO High Availability, only redundant app servers.      MAX 4 app servers for each component)
    user sessions in failed app server will be lost. However user should be able to logon agan if
    1)  logon via group, and
    2) within the group, there is at least one appl server alive.
    > 3. User logged in and run a transaction during failover.
    hanging or
    >    What will happen in case of ASCS / SCS
    if the transaction is using enqueue service, for example, then user will get error message.  otherwise, user won't be effected, e.g. if use is just search a list of order. user wont to able to logon via group during the failover.
    You also should be pepared for user connected through message server, .e.g. http request dispatching through message server directly , or via web dispatchr. user wont be able to connect during the failover.
    >      What will happen in case of DB failover
    user will get error message, transaction will be aborted.
    >    and  what will happen in case of App server fail (NO High Availability, only redundant app servers.      MAX 4 app servers for each component)
    very similar case  as case 2.

  • BIA Load Check delivers wrong result for high availability

    Hi all,
    has anyone noticed the BIA Load Check (Function CHECK_BIALOAD_CHECK of class CL_RSDDTREX_SERVICE) handles a high-availability setup in the wrong way?
    We have 2 times x blades, with each blade being mirrored in a high-availability setup (dedicated backup mode).
    That means our usable space is: x * memory_size of blade
    However, the load check calculates the load by doing:
    load_factor = size_of_all_indexes / SUM(memory_per_blade)
    => If we have 36 GB/blade and 2 blades + 2 backup blades, total usable memory should be 236 = 72, and NOT 436 = 144!
    So the CALCULATED load_factor is only half of the ACTUAL (real) load factor => the alerting for BIA overload is never triggered!
    Do we need to write our own load check function then?
    Thanx,
    Hendrik
    Edited by: HMaeder on Jan 20, 2010 5:44 PM

    Hello Hendrik
    I believe your finding is correct. Backup blades should not be taken into consideration for total memory. Please open a customer message so SAP development can analyze the issue and provide a solution (just cut&paste your posting).
    Regards,
    Marc
    SAP NetWeaver RIG

  • Changed Configuration paths with ConfigurationImpl for UIX CSS

    Hi,
    I want to change the default stylesheets for UIX components. therefore I read chapter 7 Customization and then chapter 10 Configuration of the help to JDeveloper (v. 9.0.2). I found out, that if I want to use my style sheets, I have to write a XSS file, what I did, and then include that to my application - somehow. I will not change the blaff.xss file, therefore I chose the way to instatiate a new ConfigurationImpl, change the path for the styles directory - as mentioned in chap. 10 - and registered it and... nothing. then I wanted to do following :
    RenderingContext.setConfiguration(config); but that is not working, because the method setConfiguration() is not available.
    my source snips:
    *.xss:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <styleSheetDocument xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/style">
    <import href="blaf.xss"/>
    <styleSheet>
    <style selector=".OraTableCellText">
    <property name="color">#222222</property>
    <property name="vertical-align">top</property>
    </style>
    </styleSheet>
    </styleSheetDocument>
    my source snip for ConfigurationImpl:
    ConfigurationImpl config = new ConfigurationImpl("myConfig");
    config.putRelativeURI(Configuration.STYLES_DIRECTORY, "/public_html/styles/"); //it starts at the workingdirectory of the project, or?
    config.register();
    renderingcontext.setConfiguration(config);
    thx a lot,
    Brit

    You have to wait to call RenderingContext.setConfiguration() when you're about to render.
    If you're using UIX XML, what you'll do is subclass UIXPageBroker and override
      protected Configuration getConfiguration(
        BajaContext context,
        Page page)then tell UIX to use your page broker instead of UIXPageBroker.
    If you're using UIX JSPs, wrap your page in a <uix:renderingContext> tag with the "id"
    attribute set, then:
    <uix:renderingContext id="rc">
      <% rc.setConfiguration("myConfig"); %>
      ... rest of UIX content for your page in here ...
    </uix:renderingContext>Note that you can set the configuration by name, rather than needing to refer
    to the object directly.
    9.0.3 will make this process simpler. Stay tuned.

  • Upgrade MS SQL 2005 to MS SQL 2008 (R2) for High-Availability SAP ERP System

    Hi,
    We are having ECC 6.0 SR3 Hight-Availability system on windows cluster environment.
    Our platform is Windows Server 2008 SR2  with MS SQL Server 2005 SR3. We have two nodes in our windows cluster. Active-passive nodes.
    Node-1 is having CI, ASCS, ERS & DATABASE
    Node-2 is having DI, ERS & stand-by database software.
    I've check all the pre-requisites for sql upgrade.
    our kernel is on 700_Rel. I'm planning to stabilize the kernel with 721_Rel before Database upgrade.
    Support package patch level condition is met for sql upgrade in our scenario.
    Now we are planning to upgrade our MS SQL Server from 2005 sr3 to MS SQL Server 2008r2.
    Please provide me the steps for Kernel upgrade and sql upgrade to 2008r2 on Windows cluster environment.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Hi Venkat
    1. Could you share your ECC support package level & also you can check the PAM
    2. Yes you can upgrade the MS Sql to 2008 R2, before starting upgrade Kindly ensure the full OS / DB level backup on both cluster node's
    3. MS Sql 2008 R2 upgrade refer the SAP Note
    1152240 - Setting Up Microsoft SQL Server 2008 (R2)
    4. For Kernel upgrade its release change kindly go thru the SAP Notes
    1713986 - Installation of kernel 721 (EXT)
    1728283 - SAP Kernel 721: General Information
    1726899 - 721 DCK: Upgrade from 7.0n to 7.1n
    BR
    SS

  • Configure SSO with CAS for calendar

    Hello
    i try to configure SSO Calendar through communications servers trusted circle technology. I configure ics.conf :
    sso.appid = "ics50"
    sso.appprefix = "ssogrp1"
    sso.cookiedomain = ".univ.fr"
    sso.enable = "1"
    sso.singlesignoff = "true"
    sso.userdomain = ".univ.fr"
    sso.ics50.url = "http://pipeau.univ.fr/socp/verifySSO.jsp?"
    and then I restart Calendar. pipeau is my CAS/LDAP/tomcat server.
    When I launch http://solaris.univ.fr (my calendar server) in my web browser,
    there is no request to pipeau (http://pipeau.univ.fr/socp/verifySSO.jsp?) in order to find a valid cookie.
    Thank for your help
    hugo

    I have others informations to give you
    I have a correct cookie in my favorite web browser when I was authenticated.
    .univ.fr||/||ssogrp1-ics50||SOT-zvAdApsYTyTibGDZud06UZIb3EzK5NQ8W9bOghQHaDzpMtmhiC||false||0
    When I test my verifySSO.jsp with IP adress of my computer ( http://pipeau.univ.fr/socp/verifySSO.jsp?client=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx), I get this :
    fquid=my_login
    authtype=plaintext
    My calendar server doesn't seem to test if I am already logged with SSO.
    Any ideas ?
    Hugo

  • Unified APPL_TOP in R12 for High Availability application tier?

    Hi Gurus,
    I have come up with an idea but i need your inputs on its possibility.
    Consider: i have node1 and node2
    Node1: Forms and Web
    Node2: CM and DB
    i have shared appl_top between node1 and node2.
    My questions:
    1. According to Unified APPL_TOP concept in R12, can i shift the FROMS AND WEB services from node1 to node2 incase the hardware on node1 fails?
    2. Similarly vice versa, that is, can i switch CM from node2 to node1 incase node2 hardware server fails.
    If yes, kindly inform me the resources and metalink note ids for the same.
    Using above i am trying to make it HA application tier.
    Please help on this.
    Thanks.

    user5499188 wrote:
    Hi,
    Sorry to update after long time. A just came to me.
    384248.1 says that we need to use Linux OCFS for shared appl_top.The note does not say that you must use OCFS. :-) It says that OCFS2 is certified and supported for R12 application tier file systems. That does not mean that OCFS is your only option.
    1> Is it compulsory to have OCFS to use shared appl_top? if yes what OCFS we should use?
    No, it is not compulsory. If you want to use OCFS, however, the supported and certified version is specified in Note 384248.1 Another fairly common solution is to use NFS to deploy the shared application tier filesystem.
    Regards,
    John P.
    http://only4left.jpiwowar.com

  • License High for High-Availability System

    Hi to all:
    I have read the SAP Note 181543 and when I License a system and make the switchover to the Second Node, it (Node 2) hasn’t the licenses actives.
    Later, I have balancing again to Node 1 and in operating system I executed with <sid>adm saplicense -show but the result is this:
    epsbgsp:prdadm 1> saplicense -show
    saplicense: no license entries found
    But in SAP system of Node1 and 2 in SLICENSE transaction appear the licenses for 2 nodes.
    1.- How I can import the licenses to Node 2?. In Node 2, transaction SAP system in SLICENSE transaction appears the licenses for 2 nodes.
    2.- Is it normally that in operating system level, with saplicense -show the program says that no license entries found?
    Thanks you very much!!!

    Hi
    try to install the license through SLICENSE and click on. Click on new license and upload the license from the location (Download or copy the .txt file on system).
    Reward points if userful.
    Regards,
    Rohit Mehta

Maybe you are looking for