Conflict checking issues for package

Trying to install SMCsubv144 on a server in the global zone. I get the following:
root@xxxxxxx(pts/3):/tmp# pkgadd -d ./subversion-1.4.4-sol10-sparc-local
The following packages are available:
1 SMCsubv144 subversion
(sparc) 1.4.4
Select package(s) you wish to process (or 'all' to process
all packages). (default: all) [?,??,q]:
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx1>
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx2>
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx3>
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx4>
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx5>
## Verifying package <SMCsubv144> dependencies in zone <xxxxxx6>
Conflict checking issues for package <SMCsubv144> on zones <xxxxxx1, xxxxxx2, xxxxxx3, xxxxxx4, xxxxxx5, xxxxxx6>.
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] n
Installation of <SMCsubv144> was terminated due to user request.
When I choose y to continue, I get into a loop of the following questions:
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/bin <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/doc <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/include <package> on SMCsubv144
<zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/lib <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/man <package> on SMCsubv144 <zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/man/man1 <package> on SMCsubv144
<zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/man/man5 <package> on SMCsubv144
<zone>
Do you want to continue with the installation of <SMCsubv144> [y,n,?] y
attribute change for /usr/local/man/man8 <package> on SMCsubv144
<zone>
and that goes on and on until I answer n. And never specifies which zone it's talking about...just <zone>.
I've successfully installed the same pkg on a non-zoned server. Also tried SMCsubv143 and got the same error. So the pkg is ok, it appears a problem with the zones and/or /usr/local.
Thanks for any info.
mk

You could also try using an admin file that should answer those questions for you
I usually use something like:
mail=
instance=unique
partial=ask
runlevel=ask
idepend=nocheck
rdepend=ask
space=ask
setuid=nocheck
conflict=nocheck
action=nocheck
basedir=default

Similar Messages

  • Conflict checking issues for package XYZ on zones a, b, c

    Hello.
    I'm trying to install postfix from Blastwave on a Solaris 10 U4 Sparc system with two non-global zones installed. To do that, I do:
    adm@winds02 ~ $ sudo pkg-get -i postfix
    No existing install of CSWpostfix found. Installing...
    Pre-existing local file postfix-2.2.8,REV=2006.03.13-SunOS5.8-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz matches checksum
    Keeping existing file
    Analysing special files...
    ## Verifying package <CSWpostfix> dependencies in zone <ldap-client>
    ## Verifying package <CSWpostfix> dependencies in zone <ldap-server>
    Conflict checking issues for package <CSWpostfix> on zones
    <ldap-client, ldap-server>.
    Do you want to continue with the installation of <CSWpostfix> [y,n,?] How do I find out, which issues there are supposed to be?
    Thanks,
    Alexander

    You could also try using an admin file that should answer those questions for you
    I usually use something like:
    mail=
    instance=unique
    partial=ask
    runlevel=ask
    idepend=nocheck
    rdepend=ask
    space=ask
    setuid=nocheck
    conflict=nocheck
    action=nocheck
    basedir=default

  • ATP Check issue for storage location level

    Hi Experts:
       I met a problem when carry out the ATP check, when I create the SO for material A 1 pcs and not maintain the storage location in sales order, ATP carried out and gave me the proposal delivery date(100 days later)  for about this material, the system can not check the storage location level.
       the real situation is for material A, in stock 1000 has 100 pcs, in stock 2000 has 50 pcs, and in stock 3000 has 30 pcs.
       How can the system automatic check the storage location level even I not fill in the storage location in the sales order?
    Thanks and best regards
    Jin

    Jin,
    For this check
    1)Youe storage location shd be automatically determined..Make sure you've done all settings in 0vlk/0vlp..
    2)In MMR-MRP2 make sure you have entered Prod Storage Location..Also in OVZ9 check what stocks you have selected for ATP  for particular check rule..
    3)Also in VA02 Go to Environment-Availability overview..
    REWARD IF U FINDS THIS AS HELPFUL..
    Regds
    MM

  • Bypass Prerequisits Check errors for packages

    Trying to install 11gR2 on a Desktop PC with Debian 'squeeze' (ver. 6) OS . Installed all required packages suggested. However, am now stopped at the Prerequisite Checks mainly because all the package versions listed as errors (29 packages) are more current than those require by the install. I was hoping not to go back, download and install older versions of the packages. Is there a way to bypass these errors?

    Hi;
    Trying to install 11gR2 on a Desktop PC with Debian 'squeeze' (ver. 6) OS . Installed all required packages suggested. However, am now stopped at the Prerequisite Checks mainly because all the package versions listed as errors (29 packages) are more current than those require by the install. I was hoping not to go back, download and install older versions of the packages. Is there a way to bypass these errors?Debian is not supported, its mean you could hit many error message during installation and also after installation, i suggest use OEL distro(free) instead of Debian
    Regard
    Helios

  • RME 4.3.1 device update failing 'WARNING : Cat3560(7.3):Consistency check failed for base package SharedNetshowIOS'

    Hi Guys,
    I'm having some issues updating the device packages for my RME 4.3.1 install.
    I've downloaded and tried to update the 'Cat3560.zip' package via the GUI, but the job fails with the above error.
    I pulled up the PSU.log and found the following:
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMVERSION=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURCMVER=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMVERSION=5.2.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [CMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CM already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURDFMVER=3.2.0
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : CMF Package Map Available.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : DFMVERSION=3.2.0
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DFMPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for RME already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for CVW already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : isExistsVersionFile=true
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : VERSION=4.3
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : PATCHVER=1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : _CURRMEVER=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : getProperty]  : Mdf=1.41:MDF Package
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : RMEVERSION=4.3.1
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [RMEPSUAdapter : <clinit>]  : MDFVERSION=1.41
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:49 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : initAdapters]  : Adapter for RME already loaded.
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Locking package repository..
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve]  : Checking Dependencies...
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : SharedSwim2900XL has 17 dependent packages
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageParserAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[SharedDcmaIOS] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[DistributionAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[LibSwim] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package LibSwim
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SwimJobOptionsAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SoftwareAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ConfigAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[LibCommon] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package LibCommon
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SystemAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ImageListAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[ContainmentAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[FlashAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[MemoryAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[RemoteStageAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Dependent package[SwimCCOAG] already installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PsuPkgResolver : isConsistentBaseAbsent]  : Lower version of dependent package[SharedSwimIOS] installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : pickUnselectedBasePackages]  : Consistency check failed for base package SharedSwimIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [PsuPkgResolver : pickLatest]  : No packages to pick ..Empty package set passed .
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] ERROR  [PsuPkgResolver : populateResolverResult]  : All selected packages failed consistency check..
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo]  : Progress: WARNING: SharedSwim2900XL(2.2.3): Consistency check failed for base package SharedDcmaIOS
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageInstaller : installStep_resolve]  : Packages selected for install (satisfies consistency check) : []
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [SimpleProgress : progressInfo]  : Progress: No packages to be installed
    [ Thu May 27 10:11:50 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Creating maps in D:\CSCOpx\www\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\pkgs\rme
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.3.7.5.19 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:17 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : * not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:12:31 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.99999999 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6010 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6020 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6030 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7101 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.8110 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6040 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7102 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7201 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6050 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7103 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7301 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6060 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7203 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7401 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7501 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7303 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7213 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.6070 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7502 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7223 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7503 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:42 PDT 2010 ] WARN   [CreateMaps : createPackageMaps]  : oid : 1.3.6.1.4.1.141.1.1.7504 not found in D:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\cwcs\mdf\mdfdata.xml . Hence it will not be added to the device map.
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [PackageManager : installPackages]  : Releasing lock...
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init]  : Loading history db fromD:\CSCOpx\lib\classpath\com\cisco\nm\xms\psu\conf\historyDB
    [ Thu May 27 10:13:44 PDT 2010 ] INFO   [DeviceSupportHistory : init]  : Number of Events Loaded in init()6
    Before i started to bug TAC, I figured I'd post this here.
    Let me know your thoughts

    Looks like your package repository has been corrupted.  TAC can provide a procedure  to recover from this corruption.  The following DOC indicates  why this can happen and has suggestions on how to avoid these problems  from re-occuring.

  • Content distribution issue with message "Found package properties updated notification for package '00000123'"

    I've got strange issue with 1 of my primary sites that started just recently.  I've updated the content of 1 package and this now needs re-distribution to all DPs.  I've got 3 primary sites and on 2 of those the update succeeded and my DP's got
    updated correctly.  One primary site it does not work and checking distrmgr.log I can see following message every xx minutes
    Found package properties updated notification for package '000008B7' SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 12:00:31 AM 5836 (0x16CC) ==> 
    Checking Pkgxfermgr.log does not show anything either,  I've tried with 2nd application but again the same result it only shows the the notification message.
    I saw similar issue yesterday but with restart of the sms_exec service it eventually distributed the content, obviously this is not something I like to do too often.
    does anyone have idea what this could be, suggestions are welcome.   Thx.

    Jason,  I've checked the flow from the CAS down to the primary below is quick overview.  The package I'm testing is just small package that we use to check replication is working in our environment it's less then 1MB in size and we run it
    1/week basically update content and then check monitoring-content distribution that it has been received on our 260 DP's around the globe
    CAS (Located in the US EST Time zone)
    Distrmgr.log 11:25am update package and needs to be send to 3x primary sites (A00; B00; C00)
    sender.log  11:30am all 3 primary sites have received the content.
    C00 (Primary site in Singapore having the issue)
    distrmgr.log 11:27pm received notification of the package
    despool.log   11:32pm packaged content extracted successfully
    distrmg.log started to see message Found notification for package '000008B7' and followed by next message
    Package '000008B7' (priority 2) is already in queue.
    This goes one until 1:21am (Singapore time)
    Start updating the package 000008B7... SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
    The Package Action is 1, the Update Mask is 160 and UpdateMaskEx is 0. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
    Use drive G for storing the compressed package. SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
    Successfully created/updated the package 000008B7 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 6/21/2014 1:21:45 AM 8296 (0x2068)
    STATMSG: ID=2311 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=SG-INTRA100.na.pg.com SITE=C00 PID=10132 TID=8296 GMTDATE=Fri Jun 20 17:21:45.848 2014 ISTR0="000008B7" ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7=""
    ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="000008B7"
    After that nothing anymore.
    When I check monitoring - content distribution I can see the package being updated/distributed to 80% of my DP's and last 20% are the dp connected below this Primary site.
    To add to the confusion, there was another package distributed around the same time, and then one actually made it to the remote DP's.
    This is first time I see this issue.

  • How to check performance for Stored procedure or Package.

    Hi ,
    Can any one please tell me , how to check performance for Stored procedure or Function or Package
    Thanks&Regards,
    Sanjeev.

    user13483989 wrote:
    Hi ,
    Can any one please tell me , how to check performance for Stored procedure or Function or Package
    Thanks&Regards,
    Sanjeev.Oracle has provided set of Tools to monitor the Performance.
    Profilers being one of them; If you wish to understand more on PL/SQL Optimization, please read PL/SQL Optimization and Tuning.
    See example of DBMS_PROFILER.
    See example of PLSQL Hierarchial Profiler

  • Hi, I'm having issues with my airdrop. I have looked in my finder perfrences and didn't see the check box for airdrop. I have a macbook air running on 10.9.4 Mavericks. Does anyone know how to get my airdrop back? Thanks.

    Hi, I'm having issues with my airdrop. I have looked in my finder perfrences and didn't see the check box for airdrop. I have a macbook air running on 10.9.4 Mavericks. Does anyone know how to get my airdrop back? Thanks.

    Mac Basics: AirDrop lets you send files from your Mac to nearby Macs and iOS devices - Apple Support

  • LMS3.1 psu problem - Consistency check failed for base package ...AG

    Hello,
    We've got a package updater problem with a LMS3.1 installation.
    1. After trying to update RME Device packages from GUI we got a message that LibCommon-v2.3.2 is needed
    2. We tried to update LibCommon from CLI using psucli.bat, see below
    3. We found a discussion in this forum, simular to this problem with the hint to reinstall the RME, what we did but with no improvement
    4. We deinstalled, reboot, did a new installation of LMS3.1. But the problem still exists, with same message. We need the PSU, because most of our devices will be managed after device package update only.
    Updating of each package brings warnings with pseudo package names, as ImageAG, MemoryAG and not with hints to real missing packages:
    C:\lms\bin>psucli -p rme -install -src C:\install\lm31-updates\ LibCommon
    WARNING: LibCommon(2.3.2):Consistency check failed for base package ImageAG
    see also the psu.log containing all tryes of package updates
    The problem goes a little bit in this direction, but with a new reinstallation as well:
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/669047#669047
    What can we do?
    thx for hints, Steffen

    When you install LMS on Windows, there are some recommended steps to take to ensure the installation is a problem free as possible:
    Set the per-user and global TEMP and TMP environment variables to short values (e.g. C:\WINDOWS\TEMP)
    Disable all anti-virus software
    Disable Windows Data Execution Protection (DEP)
    Login to the server as a local Adminitrator
    Install from original, locally attached media
    NEVER abort the installation after the installer says not to
    Based on the symptoms described here, I'm guessing at least the first item was not done.  TAC has a procedure to recover a bad RME package repository, but if the base installation is problematic, doing so would be moot.  If you suspect the installation isn't 100% (beyond the package repository), uninstall, then follow the above steps to reinstall.
    If you think the problem is just with the RME package repository, contact TAC, and they can provide you a good, up-to-date repository to jump start things for you.

  • XML Publisher Template Issue  For Ap Check Format

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing following issues when i develop XML Template for AP Checks Formats.There is no Pre printed stationary to print check .
    It is a Plain Stationary
    1) In check supplier name must be followed by ************** i use rpad function to get this
    *<?xdofx:rpad('Payee/Name',100,'*')?>* Because in my xml supplier name under payee group
    but it doesn't return any values..
    2) I need to put digital signature at signature field in check ..For that what i will do?
    3)I need to put caluculator number format at below of check.
    To get caluculator number format is there any functions in sql ..
    Please Help me out ..
    Thanks
    Ashok
    Edited by: 886640 on Nov 13, 2011 11:41 PM

    Issue got solved... changed the PO line amount as:
    <?xdoxslt:set_variable($_XDOCTX,'line_amt',xdoxslt:to_number(LINE_AMOUNT))?>
    Reference :Syntax for 'to_number'
    Regards
    Manikanta Panigrahi

  • LMS3.1 psu problem - Consistency check failed for base package

    Hi all,
    I tried to install the following packges for CiscoView 6.1.9:
    Rtr2900.cv50.v2-0.zip
    Rtr3900.cv50.v2-0.zip
    but it gives me the following error:
    Consistency check failed for base package NGMARShare
    There are no Packages to be installed.
    I uninstalled all packages and installed them again after I copied these two packages in the packages sources folder but it failed again.
    Any one can help?
    Thanks

    the new package you try to install depends on a package that you don't have
    DEPENDENT PACKAGE
    =================
    DtShare V1.5 (DtShare.cv50.v1-5.zip)
    this can be seen from the error message you got
    "Consistency check failed for base package DtShare"
    my advice is to read the "Release Information" for the packages you try to install
    you can find the Release Information in the same page of the download.
    hope this helps,
    also it's better to update all the device packages if your server have internet connectivity from CS > Software Center > device update.

  • If i buy an apple product from the actual customer who bought it, and i face some problem with it, but the device is still under warranty, so would there be any issue for getting the device checked?

    If i buy an apple product from the actual customer who bought it, and i face some problem with it, but the device is still under warranty, so would there be any issue for getting the device checked?

    If you make an appointment at the Genius Bar about a problem, they will check and evaluate the device, and if it warrants a replacement under warranty, they make the final determination. We are users here. This is a user to user support forum. We cannot determine what Apple will do. I can tell you what I already did, the warranty follows the device.

  • Open Item Management for Check Issue / Check Deposit Accounts??

    Dear Members,
    Can we define Check Issue and Check Deposit Accounts as Open Item Management Accounts??
    Pls Suggest me.
    Thank U.

    hi,
    check issue and check deposir g/l accounts select a open item management.
    because ur payment as clear or not
    how will u see the payment clear ?
    so , these accounts select open item management
    Accounts that are managed on an open item basis include:
    Clearing accounts:
    Bank clearing account
    Payroll clearing account
    Cash discount clearing account
    GR/IR clearing account
    Accounts that are not managed on an open item basis:
    Bank accounts
    Tax accounts
    Raw material accounts
    Reconciliation accounts
    These are managed implicitly using the subledger open item function
    Use
    Items posted to accounts managed on an open item basis are marked as open or cleared. The balance of these accounts is always equal to the balance of the open items.
    regards,
    janakiram

  • MT940 Swift Bank EBRS Issue for Check transactions

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    I have configured EBRS for my client. We are receiving the Bank statement in MT940 SWIFT Format. In the same bank is giving The Check number for clearing open items from bank sub account my doubt is how to clear the open items on the basis of check number.
    In the OT83 configuration I have kept interpretation Algorithm as a 011: Outgoing check: Check number not identical to document number.
    When I am running trying to do Reconciliation through FEBA/FEBAN system is trying to search open items based on BELNR and not with CHECT.
    Now in front of BELNR field it is getting upper limit and Lower Limit as a * so system is selecting all open items from the Sub account and EBRS is getting failed due to the same error.
    Can anyone guide me how to clear open items from Bank sub gl account on the basis of Check number.
    Thanks in Advance!!!
    Edited by: sagarckar on Sep 28, 2011 1:02 PM

    Hi Nikhil,
    Thanks for the prompt reply...
    I have checked that the CHECT field given Check number is updated in My check reg. as well.
    I have received file in Below MT940 Format
    :20:110817         
    :25:001368489001                     
    :28C:00331/001
    :60F:D110817LKR10045009,66
    :61:1108160816D10048,18NTRFNONREF          //NONREF         
    :86:TRANSFER REVERSAL FROM                                          
    012-150439-040                                                  
    :61:1108160816D59530,00NCHK296055          //NONREF         
    :86:NONREF                                                           
    :61:1108160816D1470,00NCHK058334          //NONREF         
    :86:NONREF                                                       
    :61:1108160816D3750,00NCHK058335          //NONREF         
    :86:NONREF
    In ref they have not given any value i have configured my algorythm as 011 but when it goes to Batch input session to post document it is posting one entry that is to main ledger correctly and when it goes to select open item from subledger it is taking BELNR as a search criteria But in front of it system is showing * so system is not able to find exact document to clear the subledger transaction.
    Is there any sap note to be applied here as i am stuck on it since long time....This is first time working on EBRS...not able to understand the exact problem why it is happenning here as my MBRS is working perfectly allright with the same posting rules i have used for both.
    Regards
    Sagar

  • Report for Checks Issued

    Hi
    Can somebody tell me how can i generate a REPORTS wherein it shows our CHECKS ISSUED TO SUPPLIERS as payments?
    Also would show the Invoice Number, Invoice Amount, Payment Date and Maturity Date...
    Your help is very much appreciated...
    janna

    hi octavio
    sad to say im not knowledgeable with SQLPLUS.
    I am an accountant of a certain company and im only familiar with OFIN functions.
    I tried to modify the parameters in Sysadmin>Concurrent>Program>Define, yet it wont result to my desired result..
    I really have to see the maturity date on the reports.. In R12 we have 2 date to fill in right? .. the payment date and the maturity date..
    only the payment date is visible in the report.. are there another report that will show maturity dates?
    thanks...
    janna

Maybe you are looking for