Constant IP Profile Problems

Good Morning Everyone,
I seem to have constant IP Profile problems where I have to keep contacting the Broadband Helpdesk to get the IP Reset every few weeks. It seems to do it if the weather is bad (like over the past couple of days) or if i watch videos streamed from YouTube. I told the operator this the last time i called, but it was just dismissed and they just reset the profile.
Last night everything seemed so slow, so i ran a speedtest and yep the profile has dropped again and has been set to 2mbps. I connect at 8mbps and normally my download speed is around the 7.30mbps mark. What could be causing this?
Many Thanks, Steve
Here's my first lot of settings as requested;
BT Speedtest Results (Current - Normal Socket)
Download speed achieved during the test was - 2.1 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.4 Mbps-2 Mbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :8.13 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 2 Mbps
Quiet Line Test (Current - Normal Socket)
Call break up when first connected, slight crackling and hissing
Connection Plate
Master Plate with Test Socket, but no seperate microfibre socket.
Home Hub Version
BT Home Hub v2 with Broadband Telephone
ADSL Stats (Current - Normal Socket)
Line state
Connected
Connection time
0 days, 0:39:41
Downstream
8,128 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.1
Latency type
Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up)
5.9 dB / 22.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
21.0 dB / 12.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
19.8 dBm / 11.9 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
22
Loss of Signal (Local)
2
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 2147480000
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
nil / 0
Error Seconds (Local)
2

BT Speedtest Results (Test Socket)
Download speedachieved during the test was - 2.05 Mbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 0.4 Mbps-2 Mbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :8.13 Mbps(DOWN-STREAM), 0.45 Mbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 2 Mbps
Quiet Line Test (Test Socket)
Very slight crackling and hissing
ADSL Stats (Test Socket)
Line state
Connected
Connection time
0 days, 0:15:12
Downstream
8,128 Kbps
Upstream
448 Kbps
ADSL settings
VPI/VCI
0/38
Type
PPPoA
Modulation
ITU-T G.992.1
Latency type
Fast
Noise margin (Down/Up)
6.0 dB / 22.0 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up)
21.0 dB / 12.5 dB
Output power (Down/Up)
19.8 dBm / 12.0 dBm
Loss of Framing (Local)
34
Loss of Signal (Local)
3
Loss of Power (Local)
0
FEC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 0
CRC Errors (Down/Up)
0 / 2147480000
HEC Errors (Down/Up)
nil / 0
Error Seconds (Local)
3

Similar Messages

Roaming profile problem?

I'm not sure it's a roaming profile problem or not, but I need help to fix it.
we use MetaFrame citrix to connect a remote computer running a medical program. Every computer has Citrix online plug-in.
If user uses computer user always use, everything will be fine.
It will be failed login Citrix if user need to login to anther computer to load the medical program. uninstall and re-install Citrix online plug-in will fix it. There's lots computers and users, I can't fix it by this way, need to find
out why.
Windows 2008 R2 + windows 7 pro & 8.1 pro.
Thanks for any suggestion,
ITdragon

seems no related to profile...
you can recreate a user account to test.
just a thoght...
create a script to uninstall this application. set it as logon script via gpo. when all uninstall, reinstall it...
Best,
Howtodo

Color profile problem/question.

These two exports of the same file were taken on my spouse's D300s, and are good examples of a profile problem I cannot seem to solve. This is the identical problem I also experience on the Nikon D700 and D3. The following was exported with the "Camera Standard" profile, and notice the yellow sun reflection on the door panels:
The following was exported with a xrite generated lightroom profile. Notice the better overall contrast, but also the horrendous unnatural yellow on the same door:
This difference causes all sorts of distortion in natural animal hair that contains any red-orange. I use these doors because they are such a stark example. Any attempts to correct with the WB will usually result in too much blue elsewhere. Also I have created many test profiles under many light conditions (both manually and from LR), and they all cause this problem in all three cameras. This is not a matter of one bad cameral, or one erroneously created profile.
I have two questions: Does this example show up well enough to see what I am talking about? If so, can anyone speculate as to the problem or solution? Even guesses would be appreciated since I am out of my own, and not expert in this sort of thing. Thanks!

George, thank you for this information. I have a couple of things for you to try and another question. The ColorChecker Passport color patches are small, so I would suggest trying to reshoot a calibration image with the ColorChecker Passport in the center and filling at least 1/3 of the picture width. In the image you provided the ColorChecker Passport is about 1/8 the image width and far left of center. I know, I know, it should not matter, but give it a try. This is what I'm doing to create camera profiles for all three of my camera bodies (Canon 300D, 600D, 5D MKII), and I have not had a single problem with "color matching" using this procedure AND what I will describe next.
Concerning white balance procedure you say:
Using the grey card of the same product placed just outside the subject crop.
I assume you are referring to the large 60% reflectance white balance card on one side of the ColorChecker Passport, but you do not mention how you set white balance. I suggest using the LR white balance eyedropper tool with the smaller 80% reflectance gray scale patch on the ColorChecker Classic target side. This is the 2nd patch from the left bottom in your picture right next to the brightest 90% white patch. Two reasons for doing this! A higher reflectance patch reduces the influence of camera noise in the image with the LR 5 x 5 pixels eyedropper tool. Here's a LR forum post with a heated discussion on these issues (or lack thereof): http://forums.adobe.com/thread/854734?tstart=60 The second purely empirical reason is the "Classic" target side provides me with more accurate white balance than using the larger 60% card. Perhaps this is a defect with my ColorChecker Passport target, but I don't know.
When setting white balance with the LR eyedropper tool I suggest taking at least five (5) samples of the 80% patch. I use the center, TL, TR, BR and BL corner areas of the patch. Do not use any reading that has a large variation from the others. Please remember that the eyedropper tool is sampling a very small 5 x 5 (25 pixels) area, and image noise or a target paint defect can give you a bogus reading. Write down the temp and tint for each of the five (5) readings, add them, and divide by five to get the "average" white balance temp and tint. Enter the temp and tint values manually into the white balance tool. I create a user preset for each profile which contains only the ColorChecker created camera profile and manually adjusted white balance settings.
I would also suggest you check the readings of all six (6) grayscale patches for neutrality (R=G=B) using your new camera profile and white balance settings. I have found in some cases using the 65% reflectance patch (3rd patch in) provides the most neutral “overall” white balance setting for the six (6) patches. This is despite the fact it contains more camera noise than the 80% patch next to it. Again, this observation is purely empirical – I am not writing a scientific thesis! It works for me and hopefully it will get you closer to what you want.
One thing I am going to do tomorrow is borrow a friends color checker to rule out the possibility mine is defective. It doesn't look defective, but the problem is so consistent.
This is a very good idea! Having worked in a manufacturing environment for over 45 years, trust me when I tell you defective product from even the largest company ends up in the consumer’s hands. Please let us know what you find.

Color profile problem after installing CS4

OK.
First, let me post these side-by-side comparisons:
As you can see in Image 1 (the "before," left-side photo in each comparison), the colors and overall appearance are distorted. I've read things about gamma but it's all confusing to me. This is surely a color profile problem, right? The transition among pixels that involve colors of yellow and gray is rocky, grainy, and the flat out color is just wrong. Now this color problem affects pictures when opened in both Photoshop 7.0 and the standard Windows Photo Viewer. Meaning, whenever I open pictures in both PS 7.0 and Windows Photo Viewer (my default viewer), this color problem totally messes up certain photos and really damages my ability to edit. I'm an avid photo editor and it's imperative I have proper color display so that I can accurately edit. Keep in mind that certain pictures do not take on this error. When a photo is generally brighter, the distortion is basically invisible. It's photos that are dark or have dark portions in them that display the distortion.
*Note: I took these before-and-after pictures with my camera, because screencapping would not work, since you all don't have the same color profile issue on your computer. That's the only way I can show you!
HOWEVER, when I open photos in another standard Windows application, "Microsoft Office Picture Manager," the color problem is magically erradicated altogether. It shows photos as I've been seeing them all along, until I installed CS4 about two weeks ago. Before installing CS4, everything was fine and I had been using Photoshop 7 for years and have never had a problem. I'm guessing CS4 messed something up. It had to have. Just FYI, I uninstalled CS4, hoping it would reverse the problem. But still, the color issue persists in PS 7 and in my regular Windows Photo Viewer.
Since images display their true form in Windows Office Picture Manager, I don't think I need to calibrate my screen. Or do I? I've read things about it, and to some people, it's not necessary. Right? Okay. I really hope someone can give some advice! Thank you!
P.S. Here's the original photo. On my screen, it looks distorted when opened in photoshop or opened w/the viewer. However, here on Firefox, it's fine.

You should try to familiarize yourself with the concepts of color management.
It's kind of too in-depth a subject to walk you through from a cold start here... There are a lot of good resources out there to help you get started. For example, in just a few seconds Google turned up this:
http://www.adobepress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1315593
The one thing to remember is this: There is NO quick solution, easy set of defaults, or direct answer to making your setup do what you want without your having to understand color management.
People may tell you to calibrate your monitors, or use a particular color profile as a default, or whatever, and they may have good, solid reasons for telling you those things, but if you don't attempt to get your mind around color management it will always seem as though something isn't working right, or is simply magic, which will be frustrating to you.
Here are some basic questions to ponder:
What image color profile is your image carrying?
Is your monitor a wide-gamut display and do you have a color profile set up for it? What kind of monitor is it?
What version of Windows are you running?
Do you know the difference between a color-managed app and one that is not color-managed?
Which of the apps you're using/showing above are color-managed?
What are your settings in Edit - Color Settings?
Take some time and do some research, get your head around the concepts, and it will all make more sense I promise you.
-Noel

How to solve the Embed Color Profile problem...

Hi Everyone,
This vijay from Chennai. I have one doubt for rectify the Embed color Profile problem, that's is how can i judges whether the file had Embed Color Profile or not. anyone solve this problem.
Thanks in Advance.
-yajiv

I used another profiles name, because I dont have the old one installed anymore, Youll have to be exact about the letters though.
And from a prepress-standpoint Id like to point out that removing the profile as opposed to »Convert to Profile« seems a peculiar practice, though of course Your reasons for doing so may be valid indeed.
You could try:
var myDocument = app.activeDocument;
if (myDocument.colorProfileName == "U.S. Web Coated (SWOP) v2") {
// =======================================================
var idassignProfile = stringIDToTypeID( "assignProfile" );
var desc2 = new ActionDescriptor();
var idnull = charIDToTypeID( "null" );
var ref1 = new ActionReference();
var idDcmn = charIDToTypeID( "Dcmn" );
var idOrdn = charIDToTypeID( "Ordn" );
var idTrgt = charIDToTypeID( "Trgt" );
ref1.putEnumerated( idDcmn, idOrdn, idTrgt );
desc2.putReference( idnull, ref1 );
var idmanage = stringIDToTypeID( "manage" );
desc2.putBoolean( idmanage, false );
executeAction( idassignProfile, desc2, DialogModes.NO );
else {

Full screen colour profile problem

I just posted this as feedback to Apple and was curious to see if anyone was having the same problem:
I have a dual monitor setup: One Eizo CG222W and one Eizo CG210. The 222W is my primary display (menu bar on this one). Both monitors are calibrated and profiled with a Spyder3 and ColorEyes Display Pro. I have the profiles loaded on both displays. It is worth noting that both (particularly the 222W) are wide gamut, so you may well not see this happening if you are looking at an Apple Cinema display (no offence, but you're just not going to see this so pronounced on an Apple display). To put it into perspective, I have just bought the CG222W and was not noticing any issues with the CG210 because its gamut is narrower (but still wider than a cinema display).
So, if I view an image within Aperture (not full screen), then it looks normal, but when I hit full screen and look at the same image (on the same display), it is noticeably over-saturated. As a check I also opened the same image in Photoshop (on the same display) and it looks exactly the same as when viewed in the normal (non full screen) view of Aperture.
It is clear that there is a colour profile problem with Aperture. It appears that when full screen mode is selected, a different profile is loaded for the display, or a different working space (if Aperture provides such functionality). I won't be doing any image adjustments in full screen mode until this has been corrected.

There is well documented issue with this problem. The fix is to set your default monitor to whichever monitor you are using to view Aperture in full screen, using color sync utility.
The reason you don't have this problem in PS is because it has its own color management within the software.
Hope this helps,
Cheers

Bridge CC and the constant thumbnail regeneration problem.

I'm one of many who suffers from Bridge CC constantly regenerating thumbnails. There are multiple threads about the problem, with different descriptions and different theories of the cause.
I recently tried an experiment. I replaced Camera Raw.8bi (version 8) file in the CC folder with the Camera Raw.8bi file from my old CS6 folder (version 7.1.0.354). That worked OK. Bridge CC and Photoshop CC work with the older version of Camera Raw, and the constant regeneration of thumbnails ceased.
Unfortunately, installing the old version of Camera Raw causes Bridge CC to regenerate thumbnails for all folders on the first visit, even though the files are cached and unchanged. But after that first visit, no regeneration occurs.
I have no idea why that is, but I think the experiment gives good evidence that the problem lies in the Camera Raw code and not in the Bridge CC code itself.
None of the various threads I've seen give me any confidence that Adobe has acknowledged this problem, or is even aware of it. And I'm not sure of the best way to get their attention. I've seen references that say Adobe bug reporting should be done on the photoshop.com website. I've tried that in the far past for different issues, but with no success. However, with no known alternative, I've made the following post:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/bridge_cc_re_caching_thumbnails?rfm= 1
I encourage others to "reply" to that post. Maybe if enough people respond, Adobe will notice and acknowledge.
If anybody knows a better way to report bugs (and get acknowledgement), please share.

Been there, done that:
http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/unneccesary_bridge_thumbnail_and_pre view_extraction
They know about it, they just don't know how to recreate it.
Best thing we can do is reliably recreate the fault. My workaround is to only enable Lens Profile Corrections when necessary, as it is a combination of that and some other factor(s) which seems to trigger it.
If you read all the discussions, you'll see that there are two bugs which produce the same symptoms. One introduced in probably ACR 6.1, whichg was fixed in 8.2; and the other was introduced in 7.3 and is ongoing.

Aperture and dual monitor ICC profile problem

I am using an Epson Stylus Pro 3800 and run Aperture 2.1 from a MBP with a Cinema Display 23". I calibrated both displays (the 23" and the MBP display) with my ancient but working ColorVision Spyder, using OptiCal 3.7. I calibrated for a gamma of 2.2. and native white point. I check the results with various test images.
Here is the problem: the calibration produces a perfectly calibrated display, but when I open Aperture some color change is taking place, as if Aperture pulls in a wrong profile for the display (which then also leads to wrong colors in the prints): sometimes the photo which I have printed out before in perfect quality displays with either a nasty yellow cast or with totally oversaturated colors. I have used ColorSync utility to make the 23" the default display and I have also tried to simply close the MBP to work only with the 23", and sometimes either of these this did the trick. Most of the times, however, I get these color casts or oversaturation of the photos which I had worked on for a while and printed earlier with perfection.
I ran Disk Utility to Repair Disk Permissions (many Epson-related permissions were wrong, for example "Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter/Libraries/UtilityCore.framework/Versions/ A/Resources/Icon8007.png", should be -rw-rw-r-- , they are -rwxrwxr-x ) and reinstalled the latest Epson driver for 10.5 repeatedly.
Even more surprising, at times the color of the full screen image can be off at the same time the thumbnail looks perfect! How is this possible? It seems as if thumbnail and full image use different display profiles. In addition, if I export the Master and display it in Lightroom or CS2 it looks perfectly fine and prints as expected. (I use the appropriate "canned" ICC profiles for the printer-paper combination).
The most surprising happens, however, when I drag the image from the 23" to the MBP: when the image is about half-way between the two displays (that is, one part is displayed on the 23", the other on the MBP scree) it suddenly changes from off-color or oversaturated to the correct color on the 23". If I then move the image up to the 23" again, the wrong display colors appear again.
I am at a loss: I have spent a lot of money on the gorgeous screen, the great printer, and Aperture (which is a great program), but I cannot get Aperture to print reliably, or rather, I cannot get Aperture to use the right display profile to display the image correctly in a reliable way.
I have read kbeat's color management blog and many entries on this blog here, but I have not found a solution. I appreciate your help.

Kai,Simon,
This is the problem i have been having.Colour profiling is correct,prints are rubbish.I run a fuji frontier
as well as epson printers.Anything from aperture is not what you see on screen.I am running aperture2.1.
Today we are removing 2.1 and doing a reinstall of 1.1 but not upgrading to 2 to test run prints.I have been looking for answers to this for sometime.
Simon,the problems we are have are very similar to you clients,photoshop fine,aperture not.I also have 20"external apple monitor attached which is used as the colour correcting monitor ( as the imac screen is not that good for criticl work ) I will post my findings here.
Simon, if you wish to investigate further,e-mail me,i am in leeds
daisy ( not a happy printer )

Mogrify ICC Profile problem

I have been using Mogrify on export from LR, and I love it. Only one problem. On B&W conversions, when I open them in PS, I get an error box saying "The embedded ICC profile cannot be used because the ICC profile is invalid. Ignoring the profile." Clicking on OK, it will open, but it is Grayscale instead of RGB. I only have to click on Image>Mode>RGB to get it back to normal, but we do a LOT of B&W, and it would be nice not to have to do this every time.
I am on a PC, XP. I have tried directing Mogrify to all of the sRGB profiles I can find on my computer, using Mogrify format options>Convert to colorspace. No help. I have tried just clicking on the Grayscale button in LR, and also converting to B&W by using a preset that moves all the saturation sliders to -100 (I like the tones I get this way better). The same results on both. Interestingly, if I move only one slider to -99, I get a good export. No error message, and an RGB file.

Hi Marty,
Did you ever find a solution to this problem. I, too, ran into this and it drove me nuts since Photoshop or my online photo site could not display the images. Photoshop complained of a missing ICC profile. After experimenting, I found that setting the Lightroom/Mogrify plugin to No Sharpening did the trick. Also, when using Basic Sharpening, any sharpening value below .2 had this problem. Once I bumped it up beyond that, the images magically started working again and Photoshop was happy with them. I have no explanation and couldn't find one in web searches. But, once I found a solution that did work, I stuck with it.
I would still be interested in knowing if I did something wrong or if its just a bug in Mogrify.
Del

Constant inconsistency and problems

Hi,
it's occurred to me that everywhere I go recently people I know are reporting their terrible experiences with BT. Where are they going so wrong, so constantly? Why isn't anything ever done about the problems? Why are people constantly being told one thing by the person on the end of the line and then something completely different by the next person. Why are people constantly charged for services they haven't had? Why are people connected when a phone recording of their conversation will clearly show that they've asked not to be connected. I could go on and on.
I run a small business. It is pretty much internet dependent. I have had no consistently good phone or internet service since December! There have been local problems and we have had engineers out on several occasions. When I ask about refunds or rebates to our phone plan and Business Broadband plan I'm told it will just be handled but then of course it never is. I found out my mother was being double billed for internet use and had been for about a year. Any due process for getting a refund promptly paid? Of course not! Any way of finding out if a refund is in the system without speaking to about ten different people? Of course not!
I was eight months into my BT contract when my Broadband was cut off over the double billing issue. I specifically said in the phone conversation I had with the operator that if my mother was being billed for internet I wanted it cut off but I stressed to the operator that I did not want my BT Business Broadband cut off. Why was that operator so poorly trained that she couldn't explain that the problem was a billing one and that only one Broadband connection could come down our line. Why couldn't she see that my Business Broadband was the only thing that could be cut off? Which it then was leaving me with no, instead of merely sporadic, internet connection. Having been cut off I began to look at the alternatives. I was vehemently opposed to a two year contract, like lots of people I believe they restrict freedom of choice. I rang BT and was treated as a new customer and throughout the conversation I was given prices etc. I'd already rung Plusnet at this stage and they'd offered me a good deal with a one year contract. The BT operator only let slip that it was a two year contract at the end of our conversation at which time I told him I didn't want to go ahead, very clearly. He said he wouldn't connect me and it hadn't gone through. Clearly not true as I began receiving a succession of messages ending in one that said my BT Broadband connection was now live. When I complained BT tried to say that the operator was merely re-connecting me according to the terms of my original contract and had made me aware of that. A total lie! I don't believe for a minute my conversation with him or with the operator who assured me that my Business Broadband wouldn't be switched off, only whatever was causing my mother to be double billed. Which as it turned out was of course my Business Broadband and it was BT's fault that we were even being double billed in the first place. If these conversations were listened to it would be clear that all the fault lies with BT. When I complained I was even told (in desperation once I brought up my pending Plusnet agreement) that I could have a one year contract after all, despite the original operator telling me that this was not possible.
Come on BT, sort this web of incompetency out! Have a close look at all your systems. Make things clearer, more concise. Achieve consistency, clarity, helpfulness. It's taken me about four hours of valuable work time just to investigate how to make a proper complaint in a way that means someone trained and able will actually look into my case and listen to those conversations, give me a decision.
So, in summary, the following:
BT trying to charge me £190 for disconnection to get out of my contract even though it was their error that led to the disconnection
Me being without service since 22nd December, mostly due to local problems and works. No rebate offered to me for lack of Business Broadband and ability to make phone calls during this time
My mother being double billed for over 12 months and not being immediately repaid this money
The problems with Tesco highlight what can happen when suppliers consistently mistreat their customers. BT may be all powerful with a tight grip on all of our media but no company is immune to a damaging backlash when the people they serve are constantly provided with poor service.
I can only hope my efforts mean that someone somewhere at BT is committed to helping people like me have a better experience of their company...
Alex

Hi lexman17,
I'm sorry to read about the problems you've had with your BT service. This is a residential forum and we can't help with business products or services and from your first post it appears that your complaint centers around the cancellation and incorrect re-provision of BT Business broadband.
BT have a separate forum for business customers that you have been directed to previously https://business.forums.bt.com/ and the moderators there will be able to help with complaints with business services and packages.
If I have got it wrong and you did have a residential service with BT please use the contact the mods link in my forum profile to send over your details. You'll find the link by clicking on my username.
Thanks
Neil
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Acrobat 9 Pro....Distiller / ICC Profile Problem

I have loaded Acrobat 9 Pro 3 times and continue to get following error message every time I reboot computer: "Distiller can not find your ICC profiles. Please reinstall the software." Acrobat opens ok but will not print or perfom perform email forwarding as an attachment; Distiller will not initialize.
Does anyone have a fix???

Adobe Tech support was most helpful on this. First download the updated
Distiller ICC profile files at:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/thankyou.jsp?ftpID=4075&fileID= 3790
Unzip the file and copy only the *.icc files (without regard to the subfolders that they are in - in other words, take the files out of each of the subfolders) to the followng folder in Windows 7:
c:\windows\system32\spool\drivers\color
These new files will probably overwrite some old ones.
This solved the problem for me.
This is actually the best solution though I found that instead of copying all the .icc files to the windows\sys... folder, all you need to do is copy the 3 Video files from the RGB folder (VideoHD.icc, VideoNTSC.icc, and VideoPAL.icc). Once you add these three files to c:\windows\system32\spool\drivers\color you will be good to go.
It seems that this was an error on the part of Adobe in that there is no reason to include Video files for printing. Nevertheless, the distiller will look for these and return the ICC profile error message if those files are not present.

5800 XM WPA-PSK and network profiles problem

Hi,
I've just purchased a 5800XM phone, with the idea of setting up my personal email account on the device, using my office's network access point.
The access point / router is a Comtrend 5361. The SSID is set to hidden (no broadcast), and the security is set to WPA-PSK (pre-shared key).
On the Nokia phone I go to 'Settings -> Connectivity -> Wireless LAN' and choose 'Other (hidden netw.)'.
Then I choose 'Connect', set the WLAN network name, the phone shows a message 'No WLAN network found', but then prompts to choose network mode (Infrastructure - Hidden), and then password. It connects succesfully and asks for storing the network profile under offline mode, I tell it to do so, and the new profile appears under 'Network destinations -> Internet'. So until now everything seems ok.
The problem is that after the phone disconnects from the internet, the stored profile seems to be useless, since the phone never connects automatically even if the AP is available and always shows 'Search for WLAN'. In the list the hidden access point never shows up so the only choice is repeating the steps that I mentioned above, creating a new profile every time I want to surt the net.
Is there a solution to this, or a third party software that can do the trick?, I have OS V21.0.25, custom version 21.0.025.219.06 from Vodafone, no updates available as of today, but I've tested it with a phone that has the latest OS v30 and it shows the same behavior.
I can't change the access point settings, so I must stick to WPA and hidden SSID, so for me this is almost a deal breaker.

Ok, I was testing the wifi part without a sim card inserted, with a sim, the phone connects to the profile properly, but without the sim it has an odd behavior, not loading the profile and wrongly stating that it can't connect when it does (but disconnects randomly).
So the problem is that wireless lan management doesn't work properly without a sim card.

Colour profiles problem - images saving too dull. Please help.

I realise you have probably had this question a million times before and I have looked at enough related threads, but I am still at a loss as to what to do. Please note I'm not the most computer-savvy.
For the record I am using Photoshop 7 (yes it's old, but it suits my needs just fine!) and Windows Vista Home Premium.
What I do is take photographs of my artworks, edit them in Photoshop until they look accurate, then post them online. Images have always looked identical in every program, and I had never had any problems, until I got connected to the Internet on Tuesday. This computer has not been connected to the net for a good few years, and so lots of updates got installed. I'm not sure which ones exactly, as my boyfriend took care of that, but I'm convinced this has caused the problems I am having now:
First I found that an image I had edited and saved as .jpg for web use was showing up overly saturated and contrasty in the Windows Photo Gallery preview. I assumed I had saved it wrongly. I re-opened the jpg in Photoshop to check - it looked exactly as I had saved it. I figured something had messed up with Photo Gallery during updates, so I uploaded the jpg to the Internet. The image that uploaded was the overly-saturated, contrasty one.
After realising that suddenly ALL the images I had uploaded online, and all the images saved on my computer, now had this awful over-saturated look, and yet the thumbnails on my desktop looked fine... I realised it must be something to do with the colour profiles, and tried to find out the answer online. My monitor colour profile was set to "21.5 inch monitor" so I changed that to sRGB as default. I can't remember what Photoshop was set to, but at any rate I set it to sRGB also.
I thought I had it fixed, as it seemed to just be Photo Gallery that was not matching up (it was displaying my images with less saturation than as I saved them).
However today I took a new photo of a drawing I'm working on, to load onto my blog. I had to take it into Photoshop to make edits and correct, as always. I opened my photo in Photoshop... lo and behold, far too contrasty and saturated!!
This time, Windows Photo Gallery preview is showing the (unedited, straight out of camera) photo as it should be... Photoshop opens it too contrasty.
I made my edits anyway, saved for web as .jpg, checked the jpg in Photo Gallery before uploading... It saved duller than it should have done!
Uploaded the jpg to the internet... and I have the dull image uploaded.
So first they were too contrasty, now they're too dull. I have tried to follow advice given on similar topics, to no apparent avail.
Being an artist who displays work online and has a certain reliance on the internet... my images have to be accurate and consistent all the way through. Is there anything I can do to set things back to the way they were before?
I appreciate any help.

eartho - All my images are already converted to the sRGB colourspace by default, as far as I can tell. My images out of camera, the ones I have edited and saved as jpg - I even checked some old images. Through Mode/Convert to Profile, they're all already set to sRGB.
emil emil - Thank you. I will do that in the morning - right now my head hurts and I need my bed.

CUPS - Conferencing profil problem

Hello,
I've a little problem with a CUPS 8.6, so, when I create my conferencing profil i put my name, the description and the primary conferencing server.
This is work perfectly, but when i want to add one user in the conferencing profil, I click on save, but the user isn't added. (no error message)
It happens just one thing, when i lick one "save", I return to the previous page.
Any idea ?
Thanks for ur help guys,
Regards

I'm probably the most inexperienced person here, but from this website:
http://www.linuxprinting.org/show_print … erJet_1012
it appears that the 1012 isn't fully supported or it just doesn't work like it should. I quote from their website:
Unfortunately, the new LaserJet 1010/1012 series seems not to be absolutely compatible with older HP printers or it has a firmware bug. Sometimes it happens that the printer stops working and reports the error "Unsupported Personality: PCL". It only continues working when one kills the job and power-cycles the printer.
Anyways, I'm not sure it will work until someone does some tinkering with the drivers.
Probably not the most helpful post, but I just wanted to increase my post count.
Best of luck!

6500 classic-Profiles problem

Hello.
I buy my Nokia 6500c and i am very happy and satisfied.But!!!My Profiles(General,Silent etc)settings are constantly going crazy.All the time,all tones that i assigned to some profiles are no longer assigned to same profiles and i must do that all over again...All Profiles settings from time to time are going to Nokia automatic settings...What should i do???My curent software version is 3.21 .Thanks

Full reset & formatting will surely erase data, but I don't think the codes will work on that phone because it works only in S60 series.
Try removing battery for 15mins & putting it back if it will solve the problem. If not install your pcsuites then go to internet & check if you have a software upgrade for your phone, & upgrade it thru software updater. This will surely install a fresh firmware in your phone resetting also to factory. But have a backup of your phone first by use of pcsuites.
Knowledge not shared is knowledge wasted!
If you find it helpfull, it's not hard to click the STAR..

Constant IP Profile Problems

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for