Consumption of storage capacity in in SNP capacity view

Hi Experts,
when I check a storage resource in the capacity view the key figure "Capacity Consumption" (9ACACON) is displayed.
Could anybody please explain how is this key figure calculated?
This does not take place in a macro - I think this is related to the assigned key figure function done in the planning area customizing. The key figure "quantity stored" (9ASTOCK) has the key figure function "6007 Storage Quantity with Resource Consumption". Therefore the amount stored in this key figure (and other key figures with the function 6007 assigned) consumes the capacity.
I want to check capacity consumption of the projected stock in the future which is only calculated in auxiliary key figure u201CStock on Hand (Projected)u201D. This key figure has also function 6007 assigned.
So I assume that
a) the calculation of capacity consumption takes place by the key figure function - How specifically?
b) if I create a new (non auxiliary) key figure where the projected stock is stored in the consumption is correctly calculated?
Looking forward to your answers!
Julian

Hi julian,
let me rephrase what I said above:
When I say:"the capacity consumption for storage capacity is not based on projected stock but on the orders": I mean:
The capacitiy consumption calculation is not based on the proejcted stock key figure.Instead the storage quantity is calculated based on initial stock, receipt AND demand.
This should give the same result, but what I meant is: I don't think that the changes you have done for the projected stock have any impact on the storage capacity consumption.
In you case it looks like the result is based only on receipt as you mentioned, but to be honest even that look wrong (something arriving on day x should consume the storage untill it is removed and send somewhere else, and not only on the date of arrival)
Note the standard data view 9ASNP94/SNP94(2) - the capacity view- does NOT contain the projected stock key figure.
What you want to see is correct: in standard it should work! (except that it is not based on the projected stock key figure itself, but it is recaculated...)
Did you check if the standard view 9ASNP94/SNP94(2) was showing the right result?
I asked you:" How your system behave with other order types (e.g ditribution demand, production...) "
I meant: when you have a distribution demand, is your capacity consumption reduced?
Thanks and Regards
Julien

Similar Messages

  • Should PPDS orders consume capacity in the SNP Capacity view in 9ASNP94?

    Dear Gurus
    Should PPDS orders consume capacity in the Capacity View in 9ASNP94?
    We currently only use PPDS, but are looking to implement SNP for mid-range planning and S&OP.  I would like to demonstrate the simplicity of the capacity view in SNP, but the planned orders in PPDS do not consume the capacity of the Resource in the standard planning book/view SNP94(2).  We are using Single mixed production resources which I thought were suitable for both PPDS and SNP planning.  This is a particular concern because I would expect that the SNP and PPDS horizons will have to cross over and so PPDS and SNP will have to take into account the capacity consumed by orders in the other module.
    Any help will be appreciated!
    Elamobel

    If you are using PDS you probably need this BADI:
    Note 657185 - RTO: Sample code for calculating bucket consumptions 4.0
    As standard only the continuous consumption is maintained in the PDS by the CIF, the bucket consumption (which is the SNP view of capacity) is missing.
    Check the related notes too (especially 1462965)
    If you are using PPMs you can just maintain the missing data directly

  • Capacity Consumption in SNP Capacity Planning Book

    Hi,
    Can someone let me know how the Capacity Consumption KF(9ACACON)  is calculated in the SNP Capacity Planning Book.
    No macor is associated with the KF. But when i load the data in specific to a resource it gives me some value in the Capacity Consumption KF.
    Is there any option to identify the calculation logic of this KF ?
    Regards
    BVN

    Hi
    There is no formula as such, it depends on the master data settings in your resource. In transaction /sapapo/res01 you can display the Capacity but how exactly depends on what type of resource you are using and how the capacity is calculated, basically you can have:
    Time-Continuous capacity
    PP/DS Bucket Capacity
    SNP Bucket Capacity
    And they can also have different values!
    For the SNP View it should be using the SNP Bucket Capacity, so if you click on this tab in your resource master data it should have a field "Bucket Definition" which can either be from Continuos Capacity or be maintained separately. If you click the button "Bucket Capacity" it should show you the current values you have.
    If it is from Cont Capacity then click that tab and see the start, end and break times there.
    To add a little confusion, you may also have several variants of capacity, the active variant is on the General Data tab, this is the capacity variant that should show up as standard capacity in your planning book.
    There is more to it all than this but hopefully that should help answer your qeustion.
    Regards
    Ian

  • SNP Capacity view - Wrong Capacity consumption

    Dear All,
    Our client facing this critical issue..
    In our scenario we have SNP and PPDS are using for planning, issue is related SNP Capacity view..
    PPDS orders (firmed planned order, process orders) are not reflecting properly in SNP Capacity view , issues are we can put it into two category
    Category 1
    We are running PPDS planning run for 3 week , at every Wednesday , after the PPDS planning run, if you check in PPDS DS board or Resource utilization report, we can see the resource are consumed say 87%, but when we you check the same in SNP Capacity view you may see only 60% or like, from the detailed analysis it came to know that some of the products are reflecting in SNP Capacity view, this is only with PPDS planned order or process orders , SNP planned orders are consumed properly in SNP Capacity view (this analyzed with respect  to deployment view, (PPDS order also reflecting properly in Deployment view) ( Production confirmed)) because of this wrong data user not able to take proper decision from SNP Capacity view.
    Category 2
    Scenario is same as previous one, here some time later (say for example next day) some of the products  are reflecting in SNP Capacity view. This occurring randomly.
    Can any one guide me , what would be the reason for this
    From our end we done following activities
    1)analyzed the master data didn't find any issue
    2) Constancy check done for LiveCache and Planning area
    Thanks in advance
    Sunny

    Have you recently applied any support packs?

  • SNP Capacity View: browsing by product

    Hi,
    I have a question related to the usage of the standard SNP capacity view SNP94(2). What I would like the users to be able to do is:
    - select a resource and check the capacity consumption situation
    - then drilldown into the products to be able to see which products are loading this resource
    I've tried to do this, but it seems it doesn't work, that is, my header has two characteristics: APO resource (which is showing the currently reviewed resource) and APO product; however when I click on APO Product to see the list of underlying product nothing happens.
    I had the impression reading I try to load the data in SNP capacity data view i,m getting the error that this is linked to the absence of certain key figures from certain aggregates. Can somebody confirm and maybe indicate a solution?
    Best Regards
    Jean-Louis

    Hi,
    First check in //RRP3, whether source assignment and resource name appearing correctly for the order. as such only SNP orders ( with APO application 4 ) will be displayed in data view. if you want to display PPDS orders also you have to modify the aggregates at //MSDP_ADMIN.
    In data view after loading the resource you can see the capacity consumption values in TOP grid and order values in Second grid.
    If you drill down by Header --> APO product --> capacity consumption values based on the product will appear.
    If you click on display dependent objects ( icon ) by product / PPM --> respective orders will appear. After drilldown you can create new order also.
    you can select existing order and right click to display order details .
    Regards,
    Chava

  • WORK FLOW & PROCEDURE FOR FOR SNP CAPACITY LEVELLING HEURISTICS RUN

    Dear Sir / Madam,
    Currently, we are  taking  only SNP Heuristics Run  and the output viz. planned stock transfer requisitions are being passed to PPDS as such. But now we feel, SNP capacity leveling can play a vital role in getting more fine tuned results from PPDS. So, We wants to start using the SNP Capacity leveling run. We shall like to know the work flow / procedure for taking the SNP capacity level run i.e. what inputs should be properly reviewed before taking the SNP capacity level run and what shall  be its output..? Kindly let us know the procedure / work flow for taking the SNP Capacity Levelling Run.
    Your early reply in this regard shall be really appreciable.
    Thanks & Best Regards,
    Sanjeev Chugh
    25-Mar-10

    Hi Sanjeev,
    as in any other module, correct master will play a key role in getting effective results in capacity levelling. you will need to check the following master data while setting the system for capacity levelling :
    Consistency in BOM in R/3 and PPM/PDS
    Consistency in Routing in R/3 and PPM/PDS - the actual through put on the shop floor should be the same as that in the routing and in the PPM/PDS. unless this is in sync, no amount of levelling can return good results.
    Maintenance of shift - again as present in the shop floor.
    you can provide the dump of the above master data and ask the shop floor engineers to validate the data as it exists in the ssytem. you can do the consistency check between R/3 and APO yourself using queries. Once they have validated this master data and the the actual master data reflects in your system, i think, the job is more than 50 % complete.
    also you need to check the lot sizes, rounding profiles, and period factor, becasue all three combined play a major role in giving good or better results after levelling.
    you may also check at what level you want to run the levelling. whther the bottleneck is at the finished component level, or 2nd level, etc. you may check whther you have discrete manufacuring or REM and if you really want to levelling on REM order.
    then you need to analyse, what is the lengh of horizon you want to run the capacity leveling on. sometimes it makes no sense to run on the entire horizon because if capcities are already overlaoded, you will not achieve the desired results.
    hence depending upon the level of your understanding and comfort of the planner (who will be using this result), the horizon can be increased grdually.
    if you are starting to implemement capcity levelling, you can sumulate runs and show the results to the planner and check if the standard capacity heursitics satisfies their requirement. else you can go for custom requirement.
    you will also have to decide on the stratagies, priorities,etc based on the business requirement.
    i think the above should give some starting direction to implement capcaity levelling in your system.
    award points if you find this useful.
    Rgds, Sandeep
    Edited by: Sandeep Budhiraja on Mar 25, 2010 11:49 AM

  • Error /SAPAPO/TSM227 in APO SNP capacity view

    I am using APO V5.1.
    In an SNP capacity view (copied from SAP standard 9ASNP94 view but modified with some bespoke key figures), I have error /SAPAPO/TSM227 (Key figure not available for selection) when I do the following:
    - open the view
    - select a resource
    - drill down by product (or by dependent objects, by product)
    - save
    Can anyone advise on the cause and correction of this error?
    Thanks...

    Hi,
    This error is due to missing keyfigure assignments in some aggregtes eg 9AMAPR,9AMALO,9AMALA.So make sure that
    you assigned the kefigures to aggregates correctly .
    Regards,
    Sunitha

  • APO SNP capacity levelling heuristic

    I am using APO V5 SNP.
    I have a question about SNP capacity levelling heuristic.
    As I understand it, the heuristic works on a resource by resource basis and will aim to capacity level across time buckets.
    But suppose I have a product which has two different sources of supply (PDS/PPM) using different resources X and Y.
    Suppose the capacity using resource X is overloaded for week n, but resource Y is not overloaded.
    Can the levelling heuristic be used to move capacity from resource X to resource Y for week n, or would this have to be done manually via changing the PDS/PPM?
    Thanks,
    Bob Austin, Atos Origin

    Bob,
    You can move the load from X to Y if Y is an alternative resource to X. This can be accomplished by going to the capacity levelling button and then in the options check the box for 'Consider Alternate Resources'. After that you can mention muliple alternate resources also to be considered.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Abhi

  • Use of BADI for SNP capacity levelling

    I am using APO V5.1.
    I'm interested in using the Business Add in (BADI) for SNP capacity levelling.
    Can anyone tell me which BADI this is, and the possible functionality it can provide?
    Thanks for any information on this...

    To give you a couple of examples of what we use the BADi for:
    1) Based on a product characteristic, the levelling will only level certain products. E.g. you could set a characteristic to mark products for internal use versus export use and then level the internal requirements first.
    2) The levelling will only level planned production for highlighted orders in the data view.
    Hope that helps for ideas
    Regards
    Ian

  • Functionality of APO SNP capacity levelling

    I am using APO V5.1 SNP capacity levelling.
    When capacity levelling runs on a given resource and tries to move planned orders, does it respect the relevant lot size parameters defined for a product?
    Thanks for any advice on this...

    Hi,
    In APO SNP , Capacity leveling takes into account lot size data that is defined in the master data(Product Master) with following restrictions:
    It takes into account   fixed lot sizes, maximum lot sizes, and minimum lot sizes.
    However, the system does NOT considet period lot sizes or lot sizes from PPMs/PDS.
    Further to the above, the capacity leveling method that you choose controls the way in which the system takes into account lot sizes.
    If we choose heuristic-based capacity leveling, the system uses the same rules as for the SNP heuristic when taking lot sizes into account;  and
    if we choose optimization-based capacity leveling, the system uses the same rules as for the SNP optimizer.
    Hope this gives you insight.
    Regards
    Datta

  • Difference between Bucket capacity and Time continuous capacity

    Can somebody explain the difference in functionality between "Bucket capacity" and "Time continuous capacity" as used in field "Finite capacity" in "PP/DS bucket capacity"  tab in Resource?
    How will above above two settings work when you have "Block planning" in  "Bucket definition" tab in same tab?
    Thanks,
    Srini

    Hello,
    The difference between Bucket capacity and Time continuous capacity are:
    Time continuous capacity is basically the capacity which is infinite continuous duration in time and you can define the shift intervals and breaks to adjust as per business process e.g. everyday 8 hrs or 16 hrs capacity with lunch time and breaks in between whereas bucket capacity is a discrete capacity and is specified bucket wise. Bucket capacity can be in PPDS as well as SNP. In PPDS it is used specifically for CDP planning or block planning. In SNP it can be used for bucket capacity references as Transport resources, storage resources , bucket planning etc
    With respect to Block Planning:
    You maintain the blocks using the entire validity of the available capacity of the resource. If you defined buckets from block planning for validity periods in which no blocks are defined, the buckets correspond to technical intervals in which the system schedules on a time-continuous basis.
    You  can check out the below link for the Block planning with Bucket capacity:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm41/helpdata/en/e5/90bb3b6070bf38e10000000a11402f/content.htm
    Hope the information is useful
    Regards

  • Capacity Requirement in each capacity category

    Hi experts,
    I have some queries about capacity category in project as follow scenario:
    1. I have a work center NLE0001 including 2 capacity category that are PERSON and MACHINE.
    2. Then I assign this work center to a internal activity in PS. In detail, I enter work in this activity about 200 HR. So when I execute report of project structure (CN41N), the report represent that each capacity category in work center is 200 HR. It means total work of this activity is 400 HR. Please refer to report as follow:
    - Project Definition
    ---WBS
    Internal Activity (Work: 200HR)
    Person Capacity (Work: 200HR)
    Machine Capacity (Work: 200HR).
    My question is that could you clarify why system calculate the capacity category like that??
    Thank you!!!

    Can anybody help me this problem???

  • Capacity Planning vs. Capacity Leveling

    My production facility is looking to divide up our shop floor by work centers.  There are about 20 individual work centers that are composed of 10 people each.  Each material we make is divided up into 3 operations which go through 3 separate work centers.  Each operation has a corresponding work center that it goes through.
    Right now we are unsure which program suits our needs better, Capacity Planning or Capacity Leveling.
    Our goal is to measure each individual work center (not the workers that make up the work center).  Each work center has a specific goal involving the number of materials they can produce, whether or not they reached that goal and by how many.
    In a nutshell, we want to be able to measure how long it took each work center to reach their individual goals by the materials they produce.
    This is all about measuring the individual work centers and how efficient they are.  Our goal is to be able to utilize this data within SAP.
    What is the difference between Capacity Planning and Capacity Leveling, and which would better suit our goals?
    Our production facility is not very complicated and we're looking for something simple and basic within SAP to accomplish these goals.
    All help is appreciated.  What would be your recommendations for this type of situation?

    HI
    Capacity evaluation
    In the capacity evaluation, available capacity and capacity requirements are determined and compared with each other in lists or graphics.
    Capacity leveling
    The objectives of capacity leveling are:
    Optimal capacity commitment
    Selection of appropriate resources
    In most applications, you can use two types of planning table (graphical and tabular versions) to display the capacity situation and to carry out capacity leveling.
    In some applications such as Repetitive Manufacturing (PP-REM) or Sales and Operations Planning (PP-SOP), there are application-specific planning tables for capacity leveling.
    T codes for Capacity Planning
    Work Center view - Capacity Evaluation
    CM01 - Load
    CM02 - Orders
    CM03 - Pool
    CM04 - Backlog
    CM05 - Overload
    Capacity Leveling
    CM21,CM22, CM27,CM28.
    Hope it will help u
    Regards
    Anupam Sharma

  • SNP: How to "lock" initial column in SNP data view (SCM7.0 / SP8)

    Hello experts,
    after a change from SCM5.0 to SCM7.0 we are seeing a change in a tiny but very important capability and we are trying to re-establish it in SCM7.0. If somebody has an idea how to address this that would be of great help:
    As of SCM5.0 users were able to lock the INITIAL column of an SNP DataView so that the column is the default start column and not the next future column. In SCM5.0 the solution had 2 elements
    A) set a user parameter in SU01 called /SAPAPO/SDP_STARTCOL to value X
    +
    B) double-click the header of the initial column in the SNP data view
    As of SCM7.0 this is not supported anymore. There is a certain user setting in an SNP data view (Settings --> Others --> "Period from last selection"  ) but this is not behaving to our needs and SAP is saying what we want from SCM5.0 is a non-supported feature in SCM7.0.
    So, does anybody have an idea how to solve this. I checked UserExits and BAdis in SPRO for interactive planning - there all kind of stuff but nothing having a method to allow / perform a "column locking" in an SNP Data view. Thanks for any tip or hint here.
    Regards
    Thomas

    Hello jejeje,
    thanks for your efforts - what you describe is something users have found out on our side too - a problem remains: you can save this setting "Period from last Selection" and it brings you to the INITIAL column but: once you have scrolled forward in the SNP data view (so that the INITIAL column has disappeared) and you leave the SNP data view or select another product ... it "remembers" that you last time left the data view NOT having INITIAL column as a start column.
    So, my users say that they scroll back to INITIAL column before selecting another part or using another SelectionID or leaving the SNP data view ... and of course they hate this since they have to do this a few hundred times a day worse case.
    We had a call open to SAP on this and I told them that is about productivity and usabaliity issue moving from SCM5.0 to SCM7.0 - but they have nothing more to say than "not supported anymore" - and the ultimate solution is / will be to modifiy SAP SCM standard coding - unless somebody from SAP is reading the discussioons here and is dedicated to help their customers which pay millions every year into SAP support fees.
    Thanks for your responses and effort !
    Regards
    Thomas

  • SNP Material view planning book - Upload forecast

    We are using SNP heuristics for infinite planning, we have a key figure to maintain forecast. once we load the products into the planning book, we would like to download into local file which is possible and modify the numbers and re upload into the planning book. Advise if there is any option to upload the data from xls file to planing book.
    In demand planning book, there is an option to download and upload however not able to see this option in SNP material view planning book.
    Appreciate any help in this regard.
    Regards
    Ramana

    Thanks Ken for checking on this.
    We will use copy and paste to load the data into SNP material planning book.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to start EIM 9.0 Listener service

    I have installed EIM 9.0 in distributed architecture. In the listener service, the PG's are not listed. Please find the attached screenshot. Agent PG server is not yet installed. Is it required to have agent Pg service started before starting listene

  • How to install Windows XP on MacBookPro

    How do I install Windows XP on my MacBookPro? Do I have to buy Windows XP or can I use the cd that came with my PC which has XP on it? Do I just put the cd in and follow the instructions?

  • Why doesn't Firefox's setup module have a digital signature?

    I did not notice any secure connection indicator when downloading Firefox 3.6.13 from a Denmark mirror site. This was after restarting the download step multiple times and seeing only East European sites. I'm in the Western part of USA and I didn't s

  • Error in Integration with Sucess Factors

    Hello Guyz, We are integrating HCM with SFSF via PI 7.31 for the Recruiting solution using the SAP provided integration content.(SFIHCM01, SFIHCM02) Reference- SAP HCM and SuccessFactors BizX Integration Using SAP PI We have done the testing successf

  • Import of Process Chains - What is the best practice

    Hi Colleagues, Wish to check on what is considered as a best practice: 1. Move Process chains to the Production Environment through Transports Else 2. Create them in the production system directly (obviously after having tested the scenario in other