Context handling problem in output message

Hi Experts,
I have an issue where the context is not properly handled:
<Material_Master>
<Material>
<LongText> -
>exists--->createif--->E1MTXHM Segment
<Language_Code>ES</Language_Code>
<Description>EF VEW CHANGED TEXT: GAS</Description> >mapwithdefault>Splitbyvalue(Each Value)>UDF>E1MTXLM Segment
                                         |->mapwithdefault>Splitbyvalue(Each Value)>UDF>Split by value---> TDLINE Element     
</LongText>                                   
  <Language_Code>ES</Language_Code>
>No "Description" Field comes,but i get the next descriptionfield value(EF VE) into this context in the output idoc
</LongText>
  </Material>
<Material>
<LongText>
<Language_Code>ES</Language_Code>
<Description>EF VEW CHANGED TEXT: GAS</Description>
</LongText>
  <Language_Code>ES</Language_Code>
<Description>EF VEW CHANGED TEXT: GAS</Description>
</LongText>
  </Material>
  </Material_Master>
  The UDF used here takes the length of the input string and divides into multiple of 5 and the remainder into the last E1MTXLM Segment.
  Similar logic is implemented in "TDLINE" element
  Output IDoc Format:
  <E1MTXHM>  Segment
    <E1MTXLM> Segment
    <TDLINE> Element
    </TDLINE>
    </E1MTXLM>
  </E1MTXHM>
  Thanks,
  Sudhansu
Edited by: Sudhansukumar Behera on Aug 15, 2009 10:54 AM
Edited by: Sudhansukumar Behera on Aug 15, 2009 10:55 AM

Hello,
You need to use UDF for this:
UDF type is Context
Arguments:
input1
input2
HashMap map = new HashMap();
for(int a=0;a<input2.length;a++){
     if(!map.containsKey(input2[a])){
          map.put(input2[a],"");
for(int a=0;a<input1.length;a++){
     if(map.containsKey(input1[a])){
          result.addValue("true");
     else{
          result.addValue("false");
mapping is something like this:
input1 -> removeContext -> UDF -> target
input2 -> removeContext -> /
Hope this helps,
Mark

Similar Messages

  • Problems in output messages for PO.

    Hi Experts,
    We have a problems with output messages determination, if I have the PO without release approval the system send the output messages ( NEU ) I need that determination doesn't occurs when the po status is unapproved.
    For Explo: I create the PO 45...01 with status unapproved, the system generate tehe messages ( NEU ) but doesnt send to destination, the send only happened when i make the realese.
    There is a file with more details.
    [http://www.easy-share.com/1904410163/POunapproved.doc]
    Thanks,
    Gustavo

    Hi,
    In the release strategy,if the indicator changeablity is 1 the system will not allow you to take repeat out put.
    Solution is that you have to change the release indicator changeability to 6(SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Purchase order>Define release procedure for purchase order>Release indicator>Changeability).
    Another option is that in the message output of the PO in further data change despatch time to 3 and take a repeat out put.
    Also check,
    SPRO > MM > PO > Release Procedure for PO > Release indicator > Changeability of Purchasing Document During/After Release as 2 for Release ID - G and save
    And then Create go to chage mode of PO and repeat the messages
    Regards,
    Rahul.

  • Context Handling problem

    Hi all,
    I have a problem with a context handling requirement. I think UDF is needed in this case but I don't know where to start. Please see below for the scenario:
    I have an input structure like this:
    segment1
         field1
    segment2
         field2
    segment3
         field3
    node2
         field2
    node3
         field3
    node3
         field3
    the fields will corelate the segment and the node. so for this structure, segment2 and node2 are corelated. Actually, node2 is under segment2.
    here's my desired output to make things clearer:
    segment1
         field1
    segment2
         field2
         node2
              field2
    segment3
         field3
         node3
              field3
         node3
              field3
    field1 sample value. ex. 0000000001
    all field2 have the same value. Value from both segment2 and node2 of field2 is the same. ex. 0000000002
    all field3 have the same value. Value from both segment3 and the 2 node3s of field3 is the same. ex. 0000000003
    In my current mapping, I'm getting this erroneous output:
    segment1
         field1
         node2
              field2
    segment2
         field2
         node3
              field3
    segment3
         field3
         node3
              field3
    The nodes are not in their correct segments. node2 is one level higher because there was no node1.
    Occurrence of segments are 1..unbounded. nodes are 0..unbounded.
    Thanks all.
    Regards,
    SAPenthusiast

    Hello,
    You need to use UDF for this:
    UDF type is Context
    Arguments:
    input1
    input2
    HashMap map = new HashMap();
    for(int a=0;a<input2.length;a++){
         if(!map.containsKey(input2[a])){
              map.put(input2[a],"");
    for(int a=0;a<input1.length;a++){
         if(map.containsKey(input1[a])){
              result.addValue("true");
         else{
              result.addValue("false");
    mapping is something like this:
    input1 -> removeContext -> UDF -> target
    input2 -> removeContext -> /
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

  • Problem in Output Message types in PO

    Hi Experts,
    I created a PO of type (ZRTS) and i assigend message type as ALE its working fine and idoc genereted.
    but when i am usign some other PO type its not working .
    Here the Partner is same (VN-Vendor)
    Pls help me ..

    If you have created conditin record for all the document type in MN04 then it should work becuase doc type has nothing to do for printing config.
    this is basically a condition record.
    check your condition record

  • No Output message to PO generated automatic from GR posted

    Hi MM Experts
    I have a problem on output message for PO generated automatic from GR posted. I already maintain output condition of the PO. It works fine when I create or change a PO manually.
    Back to my problem, I must go to tcode ME22 or ME22n first of the PO generated auto to get the output message. Please share your experiences on how to get the output message for PO generated auto from GR posted.
    Regards
    Hengki

    If you have deleted the config settings in the Fine Tune control of the message types than system should not trigger the change output but for existing PO it might so create the new PO and than try to change becuase may the PO is already exist and you have deleted the config that's the reason it still generating change output
    also try to remove the config for PO change relavant field in OMFS
    remove check mark of first column for EKKO and EKPO and try

  • Context handling in message mapping  for an IDoc to File Scenario

    Hi,
    Can somebody help me with this issue. I have an Idoc to file scenario. heres my idoc structure. Its a custom Idoc
    Header (1..1)
    Detail (0..Unbounded)
             DependentDetail (0...Unbounded)              Note: This dependentdetail is a subelement of Detail
    Trailer(1...1)
    I  created my target structrure the same way as the Idoc structure.
    My output is a simple text file. I need the output in this format
    Header
    Detail1
       Dependentdetail1
       DependentDetail2
       DependentDetail3
    Detail2
       DependentDetail1
       Dependentdetail2
    Detail3
    Detail4
    Trailer
    Since the Detail and Dependent Detail records are unbounded .
    But right now i m getting my output like this:
    Header
    Detail1
    Detail2
    Detail3
    Detail4
    Trailer
    But the DependentDetail record in not showing up in the output file. I didnot do any context change in my mapping. So do I need to do any context handling??...If so can somebody explain me with this.
    Thanks,
    Adam
    Edited by: hymanroth on Apr 29, 2011 11:11 PM

    Thanks Kenneth foryour quick reply,
    Yes, I see the payload for Dependent detail in SXMB_MONI. So as you said earlier there's a problem with my content conversion.
    my content conversion is as follows:
    Header.fieldNames                             
    Header.fieldFixedLengths                
    Header.endSeparator                        
    Detail.fieldNames                               
    Detail.fieldFixedLengths                    
    Detail.endSeparator
    DependentDetail.fieldNames
    DependentDetail.fieldFixedLengths                   
    DependentDetail.endSeparator
    Trailer.fieldNames                             
    Trailer.fieldFixedLengths                
    Trailer.endSeparator  
    So As I told  earlier. With the above content conversion. I am not able to get the Dependent detail record in my output file. So If there is a change in my content conversion can u check it and tell me where I went wrong.
    Thanks,
    Harsh
    Edited by: hymanroth on May 2, 2011 7:03 PM

  • Error message when publishing and problems opening output file

    I have 5 projects linked together. When I publish one, I get a message that the files listed below are linked to the open project, and one or more of these projects may require exporting. I have tried to open these files and choose File | Export | Project to | but the options in the list (Flash 8 and Flash CS3) are both grayed out--on every one of these files. I'm publishing to Flash 9.
    I didn't think much about this message until a few reviewers said they can't open the project, or when they do, they don't see my playbar on the skin.
    One more thing--when an IT person was trying to help one reviewer open the output file, the IT person said "Oh, there's a problem with the code in line 25." I guess that's the html code? I'm not a programmer, but I can look at html code. What should I be seeing there in line 25?
    Is their problem opening the output file(s) related to my message about possibly needing to export files? Why might they be having problems getting the output file to open?
    Thanks for any insights you can provide!
    SAM

    Hi Sam
    It depends on a number of things. Are you certain you uploaded all the files involved? If not, there will be problems.
    The message about the linked files is quite simply advising you that you have links from that particular movie that will expect to find the files being linked to.
    If a person isn't seeing playback controls and you have included them, it's likely you haven't provided the correct link for them to open and play the file. Typically you provide a link to the HTML page Captivate creates. As long as all the output files are in the same place on the server, you should be good to go.
    Cheers... Rick
    Click here for Adobe Authorized Captivate and RoboHelp HTML Training
    Click here for the SorcerStone Blog
    Click here for RoboHelp and Captivate eBooks

  • Context handling during message mapping

    Hi,
    I'm working on a mapping and it almost works. There is just 1 thing to solve. I use the fixvalues funtion with as input a field A in a segment of my Idoc. This function is used to map a field B in another segment. However as this segment has multiple occurences, I have problems with the context handling: the first timle works ok but then it fails (as the filed A is in another segment/context). How could I fix this?  I would like to avoid UDF as I don't know much java.
    Kind regards,
    Ulrich

    Hi Ulrich,
    <b>Mapping A_source-Fixvalue-B_target</b>
    In the above case What are the elements exist in A_Source same thing will be transfered to B_target . If it is not find any value in Fixvalue table then it will pass the default value. So provde the default value.
    If there is not element in context then it won't create b_target not at all for that context. So use the Mapwithdefault() nodefunction before passing the value B_target. so in that case it will generate the empty value instead of none.
    Warm Regards,
    Vijay

  • SharePoint Designer workflow gives Claims Authentication error for some users. Problem getting output claims identity. The specified user or domain group was not found.

    We have a SharePoint Enterprise 2013 system at RTM level.  We've installed Workflow Manager 1.0 by following the steps at
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj658588.aspx.  For the final step of Validating the Installation we created a simple list-level workflow and verified that the workflow
    is invoked successfully.  This is working successfully, but only for a single user.  If other users in the same site collection try to invoke the workflow on this same list we get the ULS Log Error:
    Claims Authentication          af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
    System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
    followed by:
    Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.
    (as details below).
    All accounts that are attempting to use the Test Workflow (both working and non-working user accounts) are valid AD accounts and are included in the User Profile Sync that runs nightly.  All have Contribute or Design permission level (and for testing,
    Full Control). 
    What could cause the Claims Authentication to fail when certain users attempt to launch the workflow?
    Thank you for your response.
    Jim Mac.
    08/29/2013 10:22:51.94  w3wp.exe (0x2020)                        0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation        
     Claims Authentication          af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was
    not found. ---> System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.     at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType,
    Boolean forceSuccess)     at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity,
    SPClaim loginClaim)     --- End of inner exception stack trace ---     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdent... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
    08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020)                        0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation        
     Claims Authentication          af3zp Unexpected ...ity, SPClaim loginClaim)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String
    encodedIdentityClaimSuffix)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
    requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
    08/29/2013 10:22:51.94  w3wp.exe (0x2020)                        0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation        
     Claims Authentication          fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: The specified user or domain group was not found. --->
    System.Security.Principal.IdentityNotMappedException: Some or all identity references could not be translated.     at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(IdentityReferenceCollection sourceAccounts, Type targetType, Boolean forceSuccess)    
    at System.Security.Principal.NTAccount.Translate(Type targetType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim loginClaim)    
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKeyClaim(IClaimsIdentity claimsIdentity, SPClaim logi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
    08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020)                        0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation        
     Claims Authentication          fo1t Monitorable ...nClaim)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.Claims.SPClaimProviderManager.GetProviderUserKey(String encodedIdentityClaimSuffix)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.CreateTokenCacheReferenceFromTokenSignature(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentTokenCacheReferenceClaim(SPRequestInfo
    requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity identity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Securi... 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583
    08/29/2013 10:22:51.94* w3wp.exe (0x2020)                        0x26D8 SharePoint Foundation        
     Claims Authentication          fo1t Monitorable ...tyTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request) 94aa5c2d-fa45-9b83-b203-a92b20102583

    Hi Aries,
    I am facing issue with work flow where Workflow goes to Suspend mode.
    I am facing an issue with SP2013 Custom Workflow developed using Visual Studio 2012.
    Objective of the Custom workflow: User fills the form and submit, list get updated and workflow will initiate and go for the process.
    Issue: After the deployment of WF, for first time when user is filling the form and submit, list is getting updated. But the Workflow Goes to "Suspend" mode. (
    This Custom Workflow has a configuration file where we are providing other details including ID of Impersonator (farm is running under Claim Based Authentication).
    Work flow works fine once when the Impersonator initiate the workflow (Fill the form and submit for approval) and everything works fine after that.
    Following steps are already performed
    1.Make sure User profile synchronization is started.
    2.Make sure the user is not the SharePoint system user.
    3.Make sure the user by whom you are logged is available in User Profile list.
    4.Step full synchronization of User Profile Application.
    From the ULS logs it seems the user's security token from the STS service and User profile service is not being issued.
    Appreciate any thoughts or solution.
    Following are the log files.
    <-------------------------------Information taken from "http://YYYY.XXXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_layouts/15/wrkstat.aspx" where it is showing workflow status as "Suspend"------->
    http://yyyy.XXXX.com/sites/xxxx/_vti_bin/client.svc/sp.utilities.utility.ResolvePrincipalInCurrentcontext(input=@ParamUser,scopes='15',sources='15',inputIsEmailOnly='false',addToUserInfoList='False')?%40ParamUser='i%3A0%23.w%7CXXXXX%5Csps_biscomdev'
    Correlation Id: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-bfb1-70bc172425e8 Instance Id: 14a985a0-60c8-42db-a42c-c752190b8106
    RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: RequestorId: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-0000-000000000000. Details: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the workflow instance. Exception details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 401
    {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error. For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug>
    configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} {"x-ms-diagnostics":["3001000;reason=\"There
    has been an error authenticating the request.\";category=\"invalid_client\""],"SPRequestGuid":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"request-id":["f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8654-672758a68234"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["34"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"WWW-Authenticate":["Bearer
    realm=\"b14e1e0f-257f-42ec-a92d-377479e0ec8d\",client_id=\"00000003-0000-0ff1-ce00-000000000000\",trusted_issuers=\"00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000@*,[email protected]79e0ec8d\"","NTLM"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["15.0.0.4420"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
    RequireReadOnly"],"Date":["Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:48:07 GMT"]} at Microsoft.Activities.Hosting.Runtime.Subroutine.SubroutineChild.Execute(CodeActivityContext context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance
    instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation)
    ULS Log
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Authentication Authorization agb9s Medium OAuth request. IsAuthenticated=False, UserIdentityName=, ClaimsCount=0 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6k Verbose Value for isAnonymousAllowed is : False f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Runtime ajd6l Verbose Value for checkAuthenticationCookie is : True f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.70 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=18.7574119057031 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.71 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x1AB8 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 PowerShell.exe (0x29BC) 0x2B9C SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {AF89E1D7-C47F-467B-8FD4-D7DC768820EE} 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Parent No 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. 
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.73 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Parent Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.74 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
    issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Getting Site Subscription Id). Execution Time=0.341314329055788 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.75 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Parent [S2S] Getting token from STS and setting Thread
    Identity f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General ajji6 High Unable to write SPDistributedCache call usage entry. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Reading token from Cache using token signature). Execution Time=7.5931438213516 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajwpx Medium SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Failed to build cache key for user  f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.76 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Topology aeayb Medium SecurityTokenServiceSendRequest: RemoteAddress: 'http://localhost:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc' Channel:
    'Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.IWSTrustChannelContract' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Topology aeax9 Medium SecurityTokenServiceReceiveRequest: LocalAddress: 'http://c1vspwfe01.vitas.com:32843/SecurityTokenServiceApplication/securitytoken.svc'
    Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-sx/ws-trust/200512/RST/Issue' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:fd5eba94-c39d-4667-89bd-089411c87f09' f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.77 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Parent No f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ah25l Medium SPJsonWebSecurityBaseTokenHandler: ValidateActorIsSelfIssuer! Issuer '00000005-0000-0000-c000-000000000000' is not self
    issuer. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {F17590DF-49D9-439D-86BC-5AE6416BB765} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up  site
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation General narq Verbose Releasing SPRequest with allocation Id {3847D5A4-15C6-4AF9-B062-E22BB555DF4F} f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0s1 High Identity claims mapped to '0' user profiles. Claims: [nameid: '', nii: 'windows', upn: '', smtp: '', sip: ''], User Profiles: f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0sr Unexpected UserProfileException caught.. Exception Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException: 3001002;reason=The
    incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
    upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0() is thrown. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Portal Server User Profiles ae0su High The set of claims could not be mapped to a single user identity. Exception 3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped
    to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator. has occured.  f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication ae0tc High The registered mappered failed to resolve to one identity claim. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
    3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
    upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
    secureCode)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
    contextUri, List`1 claims) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication af3zp Unexpected STS Call Claims Saml: Problem getting output claims identity. Exception: 'Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
    3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
    upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
    secureCode)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
    contextUri, List`1 claims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
    contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
    outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)'. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.78 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fo1t Monitorable STS Call: Failed to issue new security token. Exception: Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileNoUserFoundException:
    3001002;reason=The incoming identity is not mapped to any user profile account in SharePoint. Possible cause is that no user profiles are created in user profile database. Contact your administrator.     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetSingleUserProfileFromClaimsList(UserProfileManager
    upManager, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.<>c__DisplayClass2.<GetMappedIdentityClaim>b__0()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.<>c__DisplayClass5.<RunWithElevatedPrivileges>b__3()    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(WaitCallback secureCode, Object param)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(CodeToRunElevated
    secureCode)     at Microsoft.Office.Server.Security.UserProfileIdentityClaimMapper.GetMappedIdentityClaim(Uri context, IEnumerable`1 identityClaims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetClaimFromExternalMapper(Uri
    contextUri, List`1 claims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.ResolveUserIdentityClaim(Uri contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPIdentityClaimMapperOperations.GetIdentityClaim(Uri
    contextUri, ClaimCollection inputClaims, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetLogonIdentityClaim(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity inputIdentity, IClaimsIdentity
    outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.EnsureSharePointClaims(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity, SPCallingIdentityType callerType)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.AugmentOutputIdentityForRequest(SPRequestInfo requestInfo, IClaimsIdentity outputIdentity)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.GetOutputClaimsIdentity(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request, Scope scope)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.SecurityTokenService.SecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal principal, RequestSecurityToken request)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPSecurityTokenService.Issue(IClaimsPrincipal
    principal, RequestSecurityToken request) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x0C48) 0x1318 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteSecurityTokenServiceOperationServer). Execution Time=17.1551132895382 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication fsq7 High SPSecurityContext: Request for security token failed with exception: System.ServiceModel.FaultException: The server was
    unable to process the request due to an internal error.  For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in
    order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message
    response)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
    rst)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context, Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication 8306 Critical An exception occurred when trying to issue security token: The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
    error.  For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
    the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Application Authentication Pipeline). Execution Time=52.3525336320678 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Application Authentication ajezs High SPApplicationAuthenticationModule: Error authenticating request, Error details { Header: {0}, Body: {1} }.  Available
    parameters: 3001000;reason="There has been an error authenticating the request.";category="invalid_client" {"error_description":"The server was unable to process the request due to an internal error.  For more information
    about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to the client, or turn on tracing as
    per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs."} . f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 8nca Medium Application error when access /sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc, Error=The server was unable to process the request due to an internal
    error.  For more information about the error, either turn on IncludeExceptionDetailInFaults (either from ServiceBehaviorAttribute or from the <serviceDebug> configuration behavior) on the server in order to send the exception information back to
    the client, or turn on tracing as per the Microsoft .NET Framework SDK documentation and inspect the server trace logs.   at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.ReadResponse(Message response)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken
    rst, RequestSecurityTokenResponse& rstr)     at Microsoft.IdentityModel.Protocols.WSTrust.WSTrustChannel.Issue(RequestSecurityToken rst)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForContext(Uri context,
    Boolean bearerToken, SecurityToken onBehalfOf, SecurityToken actAs, SecurityToken delegateTo, SPRequestSecurityTokenProperties properties)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSecurityContext.SecurityTokenForApplicationAuthentication(Uri context,
    SecurityToken onBehalfOf)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.<>c__DisplayClass4.<GetLocallyIssuedToken>b__3()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SecurityContext.RunAsProcess(CodeToRunElevated
    secureCode)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.ConstructIClaimsPrincipalAndSetThreadIdentity(HttpApplication httpApplication, HttpContext httpContext, SPFederationAuthenticationModule fam)    
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.IdentityModel.SPApplicationAuthenticationModule.AuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs e)     at System.Web.HttpApplication.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()    
    at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.79 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8b Verbose Looking up context  site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in the farm SharePoint_Config_QA f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8d Verbose Looking up the additional information about the typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8f Verbose Site lookup is replacing
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly with the alternate access url
    http://inetdev. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8g Verbose Looking up typical site
    http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation General 6t8h Verbose Found typical site /sites/testrpa2 (407ba20c-079b-4b99-9e70-f86e6e13ddde) in web application SPWebApplication Name=SPDEV - 80. f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    04/16/2015 15:22:03.80 w3wp.exe (0x1C74) 0x183C SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://inetdev:80/sites/testrpa2/_vti_bin/client.svc/site/ReadOnly)). Execution Time=62.2890618779761 f5bd8793-a53c-2127-8485-418c67f110f6
    Regards
    Sakti

  • Web Service and result handler problem

    Hi!
    I load WSDL file and then invoke addnumbers() method without
    problems. But I don't get any results. resultHandler and
    faultHandler silent after addnumbers invoke. Where is the
    problem???
    My code:
    public function useWebService():void {
    WS = new WebService();
    WS.wsdl = "................?wsdl"
    WS.addEventListener("load", loadHandler);
    WS.addEventListener("fault",faultHandler);
    WS.useProxy = false;
    WS.loadWSDL();
    WS.addnumbers.addEventListener("result", resultHandler);
    WS.addnumbers.addEventListener("fault", faultHandler);
    public function loadHandler(event:LoadEvent):void {
    Alert.show("WSDL is loaded");
    WS.addnumbers(2,5);
    public function resultHandler(event:ResultEvent):void {
    Alert.show("in result handler");
    myTextArea.text = event.result.toString();
    public function faultHandler(event:FaultEvent):void {
    Alert.show("fault: "+ event.toString());
    My WSDL:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><definitions
    xmlns="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
    xmlns:tns="urn:TestWebservice/wsdl"
    xmlns:ns2="urn:TestWebservice/types" xmlns:xsd="
    http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:soap="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"
    name="TestWebservice" targetNamespace="urn:TestWebservice/wsdl">
    <types>
    <schema xmlns="
    http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:tns="urn:TestWebservice/types" xmlns:soap11-enc="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
    xmlns:xsi="
    http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:wsdl="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
    targetNamespace="urn:TestWebservice/types">
    <complexType name="addnumbers">
    <sequence>
    <element name="int_1" type="int"/>
    <element name="int_2"
    type="int"/></sequence></complexType>
    <complexType name="addnumbersResponse">
    <sequence>
    <element name="result"
    type="int"/></sequence></complexType>
    <element name="addnumbers" type="tns:addnumbers"/>
    <element name="addnumbersResponse"
    type="tns:addnumbersResponse"/></schema></types>
    <message name="TestWebserviceSEI_addnumbers">
    <part name="parameters"
    element="ns2:addnumbers"/></message>
    <message name="TestWebserviceSEI_addnumbersResponse">
    <part name="result"
    element="ns2:addnumbersResponse"/></message>
    <portType name="TestWebserviceSEI">
    <operation name="addnumbers">
    <input message="tns:TestWebserviceSEI_addnumbers"/>
    <output
    message="tns:TestWebserviceSEI_addnumbersResponse"/></operation></portType>
    <binding name="TestWebserviceSEIBinding"
    type="tns:TestWebserviceSEI">
    <soap:binding transport="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"
    style="document"/>
    <operation name="addnumbers">
    <soap:operation soapAction=""/>
    <input>
    <soap:body use="literal"/></input>
    <output>
    <soap:body
    use="literal"/></output></operation></binding>
    <service name="TestWebservice">
    <port name="TestWebserviceSEIPort"
    binding="tns:TestWebserviceSEIBinding">
    <soap:address location="
    http://................../FlexWebserviceTest2/TestWebservice"
    xmlns:wsdl="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"
    xmlns:soap12="
    http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap12/"/></port></service></definitions>
    --------------------

    Here it is:
    <mx:WebService
    id="WS"
    wsdl="
    http://................................TestWebservice?wsdl"
    useProxy="false"
    fault="Alert.show(event.fault.faultString), 'Error'"
    showBusyCursor="true" >
    <mx:operation name="addnumbers" >
    <mx:request>
    <int_1>
    2
    </int_1>
    <int_2>
    5
    </int_2>
    </mx:request>
    </mx:operation>
    </mx:WebService>
    <mx:Panel>
    <mx:VBox >
    <mx:HBox fontSize="12">
    <mx:Button label="Go!" click="WS.addnumbers.send()"/>
    </mx:HBox>
    <mx:HDividedBox width="800">
    <mx:TextArea id="myTextArea"
    text="{WS.addnumbers.lastResult.toXMLString()}" width="390"
    height="400" fontSize="12"/>
    </mx:HDividedBox>
    </mx:VBox>
    </mx:Panel>
    ----------------

  • Labview slider event handling problems - revisited

    This topic asked a question that was very close to a problem I am having:
    Labview slider event handling problems
    That is, how do I, using an event structure and/or other means, only read out the value of a slider control after the value change is finalized?
    The extra constraint I'd like to place on this, which I believe will invalidate the answer given in the thread above, is that my slider control also has a digital display which can also be used to change the value without ever using the mouse. I cannot look for a value change followed by a mouse-up event if the mouse was not used to change the value.
    Any ideas how this might be accomplished? FWIW, I am using LabVIEW 7.0

    Each and every incremental value-change event generated by the movement of the slider is still detected and queued up for use by the event structure and the event structure loop wades through them all before it's done.
    I have come up the attached "fix" (LV v7.0) for this problem. While it is not as clean a solution as I had hoped it would be, it's the best I can manage given what LabVIEW offers me to work with and it does work in the situation where I need to use it.
    Now, within the Finalize Slider Events subVI, I'm keeping track of the most-recent values seen by the subVI, checking to see if they have changed, and reporting out that fact. That gives me a Changed/Not-Changed bit within the event case that I can use to control what code then gets executed. If the event case is just playing catch-up to the real value of the control, I can now see that fact and ignore it.
    In this version I've also dumped the variant output and limited the VI to using DBL values. I decided it added complication to something that was too complicated already and I wanted the output terminals for other purposes anyway (reporting of the correct "OldVal" of the control).Message Edited by Warren Massey on 04-28-2005 03:56 AM
    Attachments:
    slider_events[5].llb ‏77 KB

  • How to display the Output messages on LabVIEW

    Hi,
    I'm building a simple user interface on LabVIEW and I have the following question:
     - TestStand has an Output Tab where I display some messages using Engine.OutputMessage; How can I do the same thing on my UI?
    I've attached a printscreen of my TestStand sequence as an example of what I want do do on LabVIEW.
    I apreciate all the help.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Daniel Coelho
    Daniel Coelho
    VISToolkit - http://www.vistoolkit.com - Your Real Virtual Instrument Solution
    Controlar - Electronica Industrial e Sistemas, Lda
    Attachments:
    TS PrintScreen.JPG ‏137 KB

    Sorry, from your post in the LabVIEW board I did not understand that it was the Output message that you were looking for.
    I thought you wanted the results from your test steps displayed on the user interface. 
    It is the “Output Panel” in the sequence editor that displays your output message, but I do not know if there is default Output panel activeX indicator for user interface that the TestStand engine would update automatically like it does the execution view.
    Maybe someone else knows 
    As also pointed out, the UI messages is your other option.
    The Output Message event number is 40 
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/3879
    UIMsg_OutputMessages–(Value: 40) TestStand sends this message at periodic intervals when it holds references to output messages that calls to the OutputMessage.Post method queue. TestStand transfers the queued messages to an OutputMessages collection attached to the UIMessage.ActiveXData property for this event. An application that processes output messages should copy the output message references from the collection in UIMessage.ActiveXData to its own private OutputMessages collection by passing its private collection to the OutputMessages.CopyMessagesToCollection method. An application calls the Engine.NewOutputMessages method to create a private OutputMessage collection. TestStand generates this event only if the Engine.OutputMessagesEnabled property is True. Because there can be more than one handler for this event, the application should not modify the OutputMessages collection the UIMessage.ActiveXData property holds.
    Omar
    Message Edited by OmarGator on 10-09-2008 10:12 AM

  • User cannot receive External Send Output Message manually - ME22N

    Hi Guru's
    I have the following issue, once a User has saved the PO he wants to receive this PO to his email. He goes to "Messages" and selects Medium 5 "External Send" and in Partner he types his User ID in order to receive it.
    He is not receiving any emails and the status in Further Data is "2 incorrectly processed". When he types another User ID, this User does receive the email. Is there anything else I need to configure to this User ID so he can received this Output Messages? He is the only User that cannot receive these Output Messages.
    Regards

    Problem Solved!!
    I enter to table USR21 (Assign user name address key) and realized User ID did not exist. So I enter to table ADR6 (E-Mail Addresses)  and noticed it was a totally different User. I enter to table LFA1 (Vendor Master) and there was information about this User.
    This left me to one conclusion...This had nothing to do with the User ID
    The Client in the past created Vendors (MK01) has "Buyers". So when the Buyer wanted to send any PO to his email he just went to "Messages" and selected Output Type "NEU" / Medium 5 "External send" / Partner "Vendor#" = Buyer.
    I enter to MK02 and typed the Vendor# they gave him, in "General Data" check only "Address" and press ENTER, updated the email in the field and selected INT E-mail in "Standard Comm Mtd" and problem solved.
    Thank you all for your help
    Best Regards!!

  • Output Message for Purchase order not being created Automatically

    Hi all,
    I created a Condition type for Purchase order in MN04 with key combination "Doc.Type/Purch.Org/Vendor". The problem arises when i delete this condition record. After deletion when i create purchase order in me21n for that condition type, the system gives an error.
    Message no. 06261 - No message generated for output of purchasing document.
    Is there anyway the purchase order message is created automatically again when its condition type has been deleted from MN04.
    - Regards
    Sahar Khalid

    Before creating the entry in MN04 the message was being created automatically. I want the system to create the same output message as it was creating before the creation of the entry in MN04.

  • Intercompany with billing output message creates goods entries lock Purch O

    Hi Experts,
    we have a problem in an Intercompany flow.
    From each SD Invoice, an output message is triggered. This output message creates a goods entry of the related purchase order related using a batch input.
    There are many SD invoices related with the same purchase order.
    The problem happens when many output messages were processed in a massive way though a job of report RSBDCSUB.
    More that one SD invoice will create goods entries related with the same purchase order and sometimes at the same time.
    The result was that some goods entries aren't created because the purchase order is locked by one of the previous process of the same purchase order.
    We have as a workaround to re-process the batch inputs wrong, but we want to avoid this re-processing.
    is there any solution for this process? do we change the process and use IDOCs or BAPIs?
    thanks in advance,
    aupalaura

    Dear Raja
      I need 2 to get a consolidated PDF from both OTF and SPOOL
    What do i do ? how 2 proceed . Plz tell me any other solution plz .
    User wants only one PDF .
    Plz help for god sake .
    How about saving the PDF from OTF and then appending the PDF from Spool at the prompt at end of that (Any append possible at the Prompt )
    Thnx
    Moni
    Message was edited by: md monirujjaman
    Message was edited by: md monirujjaman
    Message was edited by: md monirujjaman

Maybe you are looking for