Contract creation via bdc

Hi,
When creating a contract via bdc, the net price is always picked up from the info record(if one exists). Is there a way to override this behaviour and make the system pickup the net price from the input data?
Regards
Vanishree

Hi,
Please let me know the solution to the above problem.
I am trying to create a quantity contract using BDC but the Net Order Price is coming as Zero even though the condition type PB00 is maintained properly in the info record with some net order price which is not equal to zero.
Please let me know asap as this is a critical issue. The same problem is not happening if i try an create a contract manually.

Similar Messages

Contract creation using BDC wherein Net order price is Zero

Hi,
Please let me know the solution to the above problem.
I am trying to create a quantity contract using BDC but the Net Order Price is coming as Zero even though the condition type PB00 is maintained properly in the info record with some net order price which is not equal to zero.
Please let me know asap as this is a critical issue. The same problem is not happening if i try an create a contract manually.

Hi,
Please let me know the solution to the above problem.
I am trying to create a quantity contract using BDC but the Net Order Price is coming as Zero even though the condition type PB00 is maintained properly in the info record with some net order price which is not equal to zero.
Please let me know asap as this is a critical issue. The same problem is not happening if i try an create a contract manually.

Not able to import User Profile Property via BDC Connection

I want to fill some of the user profile properties via BDC Connection. I already have created more than 50 user profiles which I imported from AD. Now, in order to import profiles properties using BDC, I performed below steps:
a) Ensured Business Data Connectivity and Secure Store are running and used account has Full permission on these services.
b) Created an external content type using SharePoint Designer and created an external list to ensure that data is available:
Set email field as identifier, which is one of the columns in SQL table and is a primary key.
Created Read Item and Read List operations on above ECT.
c) Checked the presence of above ECT in BDC service and ensured it has all necessary permissions i.e. Edit, Execute etc.
d) Configure a new synchronization connection in User profile Service by selecting the same ECT. Here I chose to connect 1:1 mapping and picked up WorkEmail property to return items.
e) Mapped one of the custom property with one of the fields of SQL Server. Here, I ensured they both have same type.
f) Ran Full Synchronize after above steps. On checked, I do not find any data in the mapped properties.
Below are the traces of LOGS:
Profile sync step BusinessConnection (stage BusinessDataCatalogFullImport) finished successfully. 8ecffe9c-6d0a-e0e8-ec25-eb7a5f1c1215
04/21/2015 12:37:00.68 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x02DC SharePoint Portal Server      User Profiles
ac4iu Medium Profile sync step BusinessConnection (stage BusinessDataCatalogFullSync) started execution.
04/21/2015 12:37:00.68 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x4CCC SharePoint Foundation         Topology
8xqz Medium Updating SPPersistedObject UserProfileImportJob Name=UserProfileServiceApplication_ProfileImportJob. Version: 2294209 Ensure: False, HashCode: 36728399, Id: 4f037df6-d339-4b5a-8892-ef3699c16b20, Stack:    at
Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPJobDefinition.Update()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileImportJob.SaveStatus()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileImportJob.Execute()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationJob.Execute(SPJobState jobState)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTimerJobInvokeInternal.Invoke(SPJobDefinition jd, Guid targetInstanceId, Boolean isTimerService,
Int32& result)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTimerJobInvoke.Invoke(TimerJobExecuteData& data, Int32& result) 8ecffe9c-6d0a-e0e8-ec25-eb7a5f1c1215
04/21/2015 12:37:01.70 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x4CCC SharePoint Portal Server      User Profiles
ac4iq Medium Profile sync step BusinessConnection (stage BusinessDataCatalogFullSync) finished successfully. 8ecffe9c-6d0a-e0e8-ec25-eb7a5f1c1215
04/21/2015 12:37:01.70 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x4CCC SharePoint Foundation         Topology
8xqz Medium Updating SPPersistedObject UserProfileImportJob Name=UserProfileServiceApplication_ProfileImportJob. Version: 2294211 Ensure: False, HashCode: 36728399, Id: 4f037df6-d339-4b5a-8892-ef3699c16b20, Stack:    at
Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPJobDefinition.Update()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileImportJob.SaveStatus()     at Microsoft.Office.Server.UserProfiles.UserProfileImportJob.Execute()
at Microsoft.Office.Server.Administration.UserProfileApplicationJob.Execute(SPJobState jobState)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTimerJobInvokeInternal.Invoke(SPJobDefinition jd, Guid targetInstanceId, Boolean isTimerService,
Int32& result)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTimerJobInvoke.Invoke(TimerJobExecuteData& data, Int32& result) 8ecffe9c-6d0a-e0e8-ec25-eb7a5f1c1215
04/21/2015 12:37:02.53 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x319C SharePoint Foundation         Monitoring
nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Timer Job job-upgrade-sites). Parent No 9f354308-7b18-40f3-80d6-c7d0616cd9e5
04/21/2015 12:37:02.53 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x319C SharePoint Foundation         Logging
Correlation Data      xmnv Medium Name=Timer Job job-upgrade-sites a0cffe9c-7d80-e0e8-ec25-e024bd692f28
04/21/2015 12:37:02.67 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x319C SharePoint Foundation         Monitoring
b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Timer Job job-upgrade-sites). Execution Time=136.402252241556 a0cffe9c-7d80-e0e8-ec25-e024bd692f28
04/21/2015 12:37:04.94 w3wp.exe (0x4440)                       0x4070 SharePoint Portal Server      Runtime
8gp7 Medium Topology cache updated. (AppDomain: /LM/W3SVC/1712947452/ROOT-1-130740700225995467)
04/21/2015 12:37:05.00 OWSTIMER.EXE (0x337C)                   0x1FA0 SharePoint Foundation         Monitoring
aeh57 Medium Sql Ring buffer status eventsPerSec = ,processingTime=0,totalEventsProcessed=0,eventCount=0,droppedCount=0,memoryUsed=0
04/21/2015 12:37:05.52 w3wp.exe (0x4440)                       0x3DD8 SharePoint Foundation
Topology                      e5mc Medium WcfSendRequest: RemoteAddress: 'http://172.20.21.163:32843/af95f58c149b4b61b13c0d0250479beb/MetadataWebService.svc'
Channel: 'Microsoft.SharePoint.Taxonomy.IMetadataWebServiceApplication' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges2' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:324f52f2-8c3a-49e3-9d2c-6119776db97b' 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7
04/21/2015 12:37:05.52 w3wp.exe (0x4848)                       0x3D98 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring                    nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Parent No
04/21/2015 12:37:05.52 w3wp.exe (0x4848)                       0x3D98 SharePoint Foundation
Topology                      e5mb Medium WcfReceiveRequest: LocalAddress: 'http://ispantest.domainname.local:32843/af95f58c149b4b61b13c0d0250479beb/MetadataWebService.svc'
Channel: 'System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel' Action: 'http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/taxonomy/soap/IDataAccessReadOnly/GetChanges2' MessageId: 'urn:uuid:324f52f2-8c3a-49e3-9d2c-6119776db97b' 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7
04/21/2015 12:37:05.52 w3wp.exe (0x4848)                       0x3D98 SharePoint Server
Taxonomy                      fuc5 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges called on 'Managed Metadata Service' starting. 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7
04/21/2015 12:37:05.53 w3wp.exe (0x4848)                       0x3D98 SharePoint Server
Taxonomy                      fuc6 Medium MetadataWebServiceApplication.GetChanges called on 'Managed Metadata Service' completed. 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7
04/21/2015 12:37:05.53 w3wp.exe (0x4848)                       0x3D98 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring                    b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (ExecuteWcfServerOperation). Execution Time=2.03964470344695 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7
04/21/2015 12:37:05.53 w3wp.exe (0x4440)                       0x3DD8 SharePoint Foundation
General                       aipzw High    An exception occurred while writing a service call usage
entry. Exception details: System.ObjectDisposedException: Safe handle has been closed     at
System.Runtime.InteropServices.SafeHandle.DangerousAddRef(Boolean& success)     at Microsoft.Win32.Win32Native.GetTokenInformation(SafeTokenHandle TokenHandle, UInt32 TokenInformationClass, SafeLocalAllocHandle TokenInformation,
UInt32 TokenInformationLength, UInt32& ReturnLength)     at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetTokenInformation(SafeTokenHandle tokenHandle, TokenInformationClass tokenInformationClass)     at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.get_User()
at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.GetName()     at System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity.get_Name()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SPUtili... 08d6992a-9413-4d09-b8f9-bcfb08266cc7

Thanks for the very clear answer back. You're a star. Much appreciated and better to know where you stand directly. Have called the helpdesk and are willing to solve and take this one back in, although it will hurt. The macBook Pro continues to be out of reach economically, so it would need to be the white macBook...
Just wanted to check some last items before making final decisions as I am checking an alternative workaround
- my camcorder supports recording on memory stick which can then be read into iMovie without problem. Any idea if memory stick is lower in resolution as normal DV tape recording? If this is comparable I can choose to from now on switch to memory stick. When I record on the stick it is then recognised as MOV.
- is there any other (non apple made) OSX software on the market to facilitate only the USB driven capturing? Hence did any other SW supplier plug this hole? The old windows pc has proven that the camera streams images via the USB port (hence don't at all understand why iMovie cannot just support capturing via USB streaming...!!!!) and I understand it is more that iMovie doesn't support capturing images via USB, but does anybody else at least for the capturing bit?
- You read about Firewire - USB adapters/hubs/convertors. It is however never clear if it would solve this issue. Dead-end street or an option?
- I can capture my archive of old tapes on my old PC and then put them into my Mac. However the capturing SW makes one large file of it and no event is split. Any idea if on import iMovie could automatically split this into different events (based on date or start/stop?)
- final question: does iMovie when capturing video from tapebased camcorder automatically split events based on date or start/stop? Would be silly to make switch and then still find out I need to manually make the cuts.
Very grateful for your support. Just a couple of days left to make final decision...

PO creation via BAPI is not into database after run BAPI_PO_CREATION1

Dear friends ,
I have done an case to test PO creation via BAPI_PO_CREATION1.
I run the BAPI and the PO number is presented to me.
But the PO is not in the database.
Should I done another step to write this PO into the database?
best regards,
Ale

*Confirm the document creation by calling database COMMIT
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
WAIT = 'X'
IMPORTING
RETURN =
end-of-selection.
*Output the messages returned from BAPI call
LOOP AT RETURN.
WRITE / RETURN-MESSAGE.
ENDLOOP.

Material Creation Using BDCs.

Hi all,
I have developed a program for Material Creation using BDC.
Material is Being created and that is working well and good.Here i have a Requirement to update the Newly creted material in Ztable.So when i use call transaction mathod,i have written code for updation under the line CALL TRANSACTION.where in iam getting newly creatde material from MARA table,and so it is working perfectly fine..
But our requirement should be sessions method,so when i use sessions method and exeute the program..we face the problem of updation.
the piece of code for updation is updating previously created material.
Literally speaking only the sessions are created ,when the program is executed,material is not created when program is run.Material is only created when the sessions are processed using SM35,
So how should i do here,where should be the updation code written and where will we get the newly created material in sessions method..
Pls Help me in solving this problem

hai priyanaka it might be due to configuration problem
bcos manulay also ur gettign this , so just consult ur MM consultant for soem setting
regards
afzal

SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button " create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Best Regards
Liam

The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy is executed but we dont see any contract created
Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
Best regads and thanks again for your help!

Waring messages for PO Date in the contract creation?

Hi Friends,
Expecting answers with some functional knowledge,
I am developing one webservice to create value contract from dotnet front end,
So user can enter inputs from that front end and he will get SAP generated value contract id.
Here I did validations for all the fields and giving error messages to restrict user to dont give incorrect values.
Now coming to my issue..,
While entering the PO Date in the initial screen of contract creation,
If I enter future date,
The purchase order date lies in the future. Please check
If I enter the past date.,
The purchase order date is in the past. Please check
I will get warning messages like this, so what should i do, I can enter, today's date to avoid these messages,
And I can neglect these two messages to proceed, as they are warings only.
But in my case , Can i process these messages to front end, Is it mandatory.
I want to know the intention of these messages, then i will take good decision on this...,
Thanks,
Naveen.I

Hi..,
Thanks for your attention..,
After consulting some people on this issue, I got that..,
Mostly PO Date is current date, but in the case of purchage receiving process is late then the date may be in past..,
Similerly, because of some business reason we can create contract before receiving of purchage order, where order should
must get, in this case user can enter future date.
So as if it is not special case user creates contrat with po date as current date, system gives some warning!!
Better to pass this messages to front end if we are using webservices or some thing like other technolgies.
welcome to other comments on this..
Thanks,
Naveen.I

GUI tran to delete shopping cart via BDC

I'm trying to find a GUI (not web) tran which can delete a shopping cart (set header status = I1040) and can be called via BDC:
1. I can enter "/n" to get out of the Easy Access Menu and then run tran BBP_MON_SC in the GUI to delete a shopping cart. However, is there a way to run the GUI tran BBP_MON_SC via BDC considering it has to be done out of the Easy Access Menu?
2. Is there some other GUI tran that can delete a shopping cart without having to worry about getting out of the Easy Access Menu?
We're running the EBP extended classic scenario with SRM 4.0 and SRM_SERVER 5.00.
Thanks,
Brad

Hi,
You can delete form BBPSC04 as well.But all the GUI tcodes need to be run using "/n" only.
BR,
Disha.
Pls reward points for useful answers.

Nfs mount point does not allow file creations via java.io.File

Folks,
I have mounted an nfs drive to iFS on a Solaris server:
mount -F nfs nfs://server:port/ifsfolder /unixfolder
I can mkdir and touch files no problem. They appear in iFS as I'd expect. However if I write to the nfs mount via a JVM using java.io.File encounter the following problems:
Only directories are created ? unless I include the user that started the JVM in the oinstall unix group with the oracle user because it's the oracle user that writes to iFS not the user that creating the files!
I'm trying to create several files in a single directory via java.io.File BUT only the first file is created. I've tried putting waits in the code to see if it a timing issue but this doesn't appear to be. Writing via java.io.File to either a native directory of a native nfs mountpoint works OK. ie. Junit test against native file system works but not against an iFS mount point. Curiously the same unit tests running on PC with a windows driving mapping to iFS work OK !! so why not via a unix NFS mapping ?
many thanks in advance.
C

Hi Diep,
have done as requested via Oracle TAR #3308936.995. As it happens the problem is resolved. The resolution has been not to create the file via java.io.File.createNewFile(); before adding content via an outputStream. if the File creation is left until the content is added as shown below the problem is resolved.
Another quick question is link creation via 'ln -fs' and 'ln -f' supported against and nfs mount point to iFS ? (at Operating System level, rather than adding a folder path relationship via the Java API).
many thanks in advance.
public void createFile(String p_absolutePath, InputStream p_inputStream) throws Exception
File file = null;
file = new File(p_absolutePath);
// Oracle TAR Number: 3308936.995
// Uncomment line below to cause failure java.io.IOException: Operation not supported on transport endpoint
// at java.io.UnixFileSystem.createFileExclusively(Native Method)
// at java.io.File.createNewFile(File.java:828)
// at com.unisys.ors.filesystemdata.OracleTARTest.createFile(OracleTARTest.java:43)
// at com.unisys.ors.filesystemdata.OracleTARTest.main(OracleTARTest.java:79)
//file.createNewFile();
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(file);
byte[] buffer = new byte[1024];
int noOfBytesRead = 0;
while ((noOfBytesRead = p_inputStream.read(buffer, 0, buffer.length)) != -1)
fos.write(buffer, 0, noOfBytesRead);
p_inputStream.close();
fos.flush();
fos.close();
}

Problem while SO creation through BDC

Hi Experts,
The follow problem came in log file of SM35 ,while SO creation through BDC for some sales org.
Runtime error COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW has occurred.
could you please tell me what is problem.
Thanks
jai

Hi
It could be the following reasons,
1. Too many orders
2. Mismatch in the field, like fields skip a line so data not matching.
Check these
Reward if it helped!
Chandru

Planned order creation via MRP depends, If we change Delivery date in STO

Hi,
Planned order creation via MRP depends, If we change Delivery date in Stock transfer Order.
I created STO with delivery date as 31.1.2012 and when i checked MD04, i can see Planned order created on 27.2.2012 with the same above STO quantity .
Now when i changed the delivery date as 30.1.2012 and runned MD03, and then checkd MD04, planned order disappeared.
Why Planned order got created when STO delivery date was 31.1.2012 and when I changed the delivery date in PO, planned order disappeared.
MRP profile details :
Plnd delivery time 1
GR processing time 1
Planning time fence 38
Tot. repl. lead time 38
Can you please let me know why system is beaving in this manner?
Regards
Utsav

Hi,
Normally , MRP runs based upon the requirements.If your STO is created for a date , system checks through the availabiloty check wheather there exists any stock for that date to get deliverred in the supply plant .If there exists for that date the stock , planned order will not be created.If no stock available then a planned order will be created in MRP.
cHECK the availability check parameters assigned to material master in supply plant.
Regards,

SRM contract creation date

Hi, y'all
Reckon where contract creation date is in SRM? What table is it on?
I've Googled and Googled. Can't find a clue.
Any documentation on the tables in SRM?
Thanks.

Hi Perry,
How about table CRMD_ORDERADM_H?
You should be able to find the creation date time of SRM document in this table.
Please let me know if I have any misunderstanding of your query.
Best regards,
Wendy

MWST condition type missing in contract creation,VA41

Hi, got a problem here during contract creation. I can't get the MWST show up in the contract condition tab. Analysis result :
010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)
Error Message : Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing
Things I have done :
a) checked pricing procedure V/08
b) created condition records VK11
c) checked customer tax classification : Liable for taxes
d) checked material tax data : Full tax
e) ???
what else did I miss out?
Thanks
Andy

Option 1: If you do not want MWST condition as mandatory, then remove the check from check box in the pricing procedure (T.Code: V/08). MWST is tax condition & Tax condition are normally not mandatory, as it may vary according to Business Requirement.
Option 2: "010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)": Check the access sequence maintained for Condition Type MWST (T.Code": V/06). Next, Check the Access Sequence & the access 010 assigned to it. (T.Code:V/07). Check whether Accesses & fields are assigned correctly.
Option 3: Instead of maintaining condition record for access 010, maintain for different combination & check the result. Even in my case, once the access with reference to tax classification did not give desired result, but was achieved bu maintaining another combination.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward points if helpful.

IDOC transfer during Contract Creation

Hi All,
I have a requirement with the contract creation in SRM contract management.
Do you Know which IDOCs is/are transmitted to the ERP during a contract creation?
Thanks in Advance!
Martin.

Hi Martin,
To add further to Claudia's note, Message Types "BLAORD" & "COND_A" are set-up in ECC as incoming. There is no Mesage Type set-up for these (as OUTBOUND) on SRM side.
In SRM, Message Type "BLAREL" should be set-up as INBOUND. This carries the release information for the contract from ECC to SRM.
Cheers,
Akash

Payment method in Contract Creation

Hi,
Was just wondering why the payment method i entered during contract creation (Goto > Header > Financial Accounting > Pmnt method) does not kick in during payment run. What happens is that the payment method defined in the master record is being used instead of the one i indicated. Kindly advise. Thanks.

Hi,
This is because when you are trying to release the Contract using OR......system first search for payment method u have assigned for the particular material assigned to particular contract customer.
If nothing is available there only than system picks payment method from the contract.
Hope it helps.
Raj

Contract creation via bdc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for