Control/Trailer Record - use Pre-Reconciliation Workflow?

preface: I am NEW to IdM.
Would a best practice for verifying a control record in a flat file used for reconciliation be the use of the pre-reconciliation workflow? For instance, one implementation of the control record is a trailer record which indicates the file contents are complete. Other possibilities include verifying the control record outside of IdM with a script or implementing some other mechanism like a checksum on the file and do a verification prior to the reconciliation starting. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.

I vaguely remember encountering this last year and it was because the system did not recognise a blank value for the formula to work. What you ended up with was
<> 0-3 AND ECR=0-3
Can you put in a default value of "please select" that way when you change it to 0-3 the formula will go
please select <> 0-3 AND ECR=0-3 and it will trigger
cheers
Alex

Similar Messages

Workflow Help - Using PRE function

Hi,
I need to create a workflow on "when modified record saved" trigger event using PRE function. I am currently using this syntax :
(FieldValue('<IndexedPick0>')='Central') AND (FieldValue('<SalesStage>')='Qualified') OR (FieldValue('<SalesStage>')= 'Approach') OR (FieldValue('<SalesStage>')= 'Quote') OR (FieldValue('<SalesStage>')='Negotiation')
What we want this workflow to do is to send an email only when a sales stage is modified or changed to the values above in the syntax, not anything else on the opportunity page.
Waiting for a response.
Thanks in advance
Ahmed

Hi !
Try this :
*[<IndexedPick0>] = 'Central' AND [<SalesStage>] <> PRE('<SalesStage>') AND ([<SalesStage>] = 'Qualified' OR [<SalesStage>] = 'Approach' OR [<SalesStage>] = 'Quote' OR [<SalesStage>] = 'Negotiation')*
This will trigger only when salestage is modified to 1 of the 4 stages and indexedpick0 = 'Central'.
Hope this will help, feel free to ask more !
Max

I there, my question is quite simple, I would like to know if the "apple remote control" can be used with a mac mini and , if so, it can be used to control also the "logic pro" functions (e.g. record, start, stop etc). Thks a lot, Danilo

I there, my question is quite simple, I would like to know if the "apple remote control" can be used with a mac mini and , if so, it can be used to control also the "logic pro" functions (e.g. record, start, stop etc). Thks a lot, Danilo

Good work, thanks for the report.

Data Merge: How to use script on the preview next a record and pre a record?

Preview data records too much, want to use the script implementation preview next a record and pre a record, and set shortcut keys for the script.
the following script can be opened and closed to preview:
app.menuActions.itemByID(108035).checked
But I don't know preview next a record and pre a record script in how to implement.

Bump. I'm looking for this shortcut as well. Any help would be very appreciated.

How to Seggragate Header, Footer and Trailer Records in Informatica Cloud ?

Hi All, This is my source file Structure which is Flat File. Source File : "RecordType","Creation Date","Interface Name""H","06-08-2015","SFC02""RecordType","Account Number","Payoff Amount","Good Through Date""D","123456787","2356.14","06-08-2015""D","12347","2356.14","06-08-2015""D","123487","235.14","06-08-2015""RecordType","Creation Date","TotalRecordCount""T","06-08-2015","5" The Source File has to be loaded into three targets for Header , Detail and Trailer records separately. Target Files: File 1 : Header.txt
"RecordType","Creation Date","Interface Name""H","06-08-2015","SFC02" File 2 : Detail.txt "RecordType","Account Number","Payoff Amount","Good Through Date""D","123456787","2356.14","06-08-2015""D","12347","2356.14","06-08-2015""D","123487","235.14","06-08-2015" File 3 : Trailer.txt "RecordType","Creation Date","TotalRecordCount""T","06-08-2015","5" I tired this solution below : 1. Source ---> Expression ]-----filter 1---Detail.txt -----filter 2---Trailer.txt In source , I will read the records starting from 3rd row. This is because, if i read from first row, the detail part contains more fields when compared to Header part. Header Part contains only three fields. So it is taking only first three fields records in Detail Section as well.That's why I am skipping the first two records(Header fields and header record) .. refer the example.. In filter 1, condition is Record_Type = 'D'. In Filter 2 , condition is Record_Type = 'T'.So, the filter 1 will load to Detail.txt and Filter 2 Will load to Trailer.txt In task , pre session command, Calling the windows .bat script to fetch the first two lines and load into Header.txt This solution is working fine.. My query is can we use two pipeline flow in a same mapping in Informatica cloud.? Pipeline Flow 1 Source ---> Expression ]-----filter 1---Detail.txt -----filter 2---Trailer.txtPipeline Flow 2 Source ---> Expression ]-----filter 3(Record_Type='H')---Header.txt Source file is same in two flows. In first flow, I will read from the third row, skipping the header section as I mentioned earlier.In second flow , I ll read the entire content and take only header record and load into target. If I add the flow 2 to existing flow 1. I am getting the below error..TE_7020 Internal error. The Source Qualifier [Header_Source] contains an unbound field [Creation_Date]. Contact Informatica Global Customer Support. 1. Do informatica Cloud supports, two parallel flow in a same mapping ?2. Any other best solution for my requirement? Since I am new to Informatica Cloud, Can anyone suggest any other solution if you have?? It will be more helpful if you guys suggest a good solution .. ThanksSindhu Ravindran

We are using a Webservices Consumer Tranformation in our mapping to connect to RightFax Server using a WSDL url via Business Service in a mapping.Here in the mapping, where we are sending the input parameters through a flat file and then connecting to Rightfax Server via WS Consumer transformation and then fetching the data and writing to a Flat File. 07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing Connection: Conn_000A7T0B0000000000EM ...07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing Source Definition: SRC_RightFax_txt ...07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing Target Definition: GetFax_txt ...07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing Target Definition: FaultGroup_txt ...07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing SessionConfig: default_session_config ... <Warning> : The Error Log DB Connection value should have Relational: as the prefix. <Warning> : Invalid value for attribute Error Log DB Connection. Will use the default value Validating Source Definition SRC_RightFax_txt... Validating Target Definition FaultGroup_txt... Validating Target Definition GetFax_txt...07/28/2015 10:10:49 **** Importing Mapping: Mapping0 ... <Warning> : transformation: RIghtfax - Invalid value for attribute Output is repeatable. Will use the default value Never [transformation< RIghtfax > ] Validating transformations of mapping Mapping0...Validating mapping variable(s).07/28/2015 10:10:50 **** Importing Workflow: wf_mtt_000A7T0Z00000000001M ... <Warning> : Invalid value Optimize throughout for attribute Concurrent read partitioning. Will use the default value Optimize throughput [Session< s_mtt_000A7T0Z00000000001M > --> File Reader< File Reader > ] <Warning> : The value entered is not a valid integer. <Warning> : Invalid value NO for attribute Fail task after wait time. Will use the default value Successfully extracted session instance [s_mtt_000A7T0Z00000000001M]. Starting repository sequence id is [1048287470] Kindly provide us a solution. Attached are logs for reference.

Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer) EDI error

Hi
WHile valiidating the EDI 875 using SpecBuilder I am getting following error
Segment IEA(Interchange Control Trailer) at guideline position (N/A) is missing. This segment's standard option is Mandatory.
This segment was expected after:
Segment Count: 22
Character: 730
My EDI file is as follows
ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>
GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010
ST*875*171889
G50*N*20081103*236772
G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301
G62*02*20081106
NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO
G66*PP*M*2
N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200
N3*P.O.BOX2148
N4*HICKORY*NC*28603
N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400
N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD
N4*HICKORY*NC*28601
N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541
G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669
G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT
G70*60*7.5*OZ
G72*88*02***4.8
G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742
SE*19*171889
GE*1*271883
IEA*1*000271883
I am putting all the headers and information still getting the error
Any pointers will be highly appreciated
Regards
Sahil

Hi Sahil,
CR/LF is missing after IEA segment or simply press enter after IEA segment and EDIFECS will validate it fine.
ISA*00* *00* *12*8283234100 *08*9267710000 *081103*1315*U*00401*000271883*0*P*>~
GS*OG*8283234100*3014302200*20081103*1315*271883*T*004010~
ST*875*171889~
G50*N*20081103*236772~
G61*BD*GINASHARPE/KIMSCEARCE*TE*8287254301~
G62*02*20081106~
NTE*ALL*IMPORTANTPOSHIPPINGINFORMATIONatWWW.MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORS.COMVENDORINFO~
G66*PP*M*2~
N1*BT*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880200~
N3*P.O.BOX2148~
N4*HICKORY*NC*28603~
N1*ST*MERCHANTSDISTRIBUTORSINC.*9*0069968880400~
N3*5005ALEXLEEBOULEVARD~
N4*HICKORY*NC*28601~
N1*VN*DPIMIDATLA*92*71541~
G68*1*CA*123.22*004132400013*PI*090669~
G69*SHP-DOWNEYSHNYBTRASSRT~
G70*60*7.5*OZ~
G72*88*02***4.8~
G76*3866*CA*42093*LB*2019*CF**7742742~
SE*19*171889~
GE*1*271883~
IEA*1*000271883~

Change control cycle record

Hi all,
Can anyone please tell me the transaction code or if some config. required to change my control cycle record.
I created one from PK01, now when I wish to edit it at PK02, it gives me the following error.
Control cycle from WM/PP may not be processed here
Message no. PK083
Diagnosis
Control cycles are created both for Kanban and for warehouse management. However, control cycles created for the warehouse management system may not be used in Kanban and vice versa.
Any help is appreciated
Rgds,

HI
I am also facing the same problem.
I am working on r/3 4.7
Please can any one help regarding this problem.
Thanks in advance

PP/WM control cycle records

Our company is working to install SAP WM. I am looking for easy to use reporting to identify materials that are missing control cycle records, but have been allocated to a work center/operation.

Hi,
Try this table PKHD at SE16/SE11 . Create a query for the table so that you can get the information.
Regards,

Matching score for new records added to existing workflow

Hi SDNers,
My doubt is:
I have a 2 Workflows which are already in process. The triggering event for them is Manual, Record Import.
Now I manually assigned 20 records to "Workflow A" based on Condition 1
Also, I manually assigned 20 records to "Workflow B" based on Condition 2
I am importing 30 new records. Based on the condition, I want to assign these records to the existing Workflow A / Workflow B.
Note: There is a Match stencil, so the newly created records have to be matched against the existing records in the present Workflow itself.
Is it possible to add new records o existing workflow manually?
Also, what about the Matching score? will the records be matched?
Thanks & Regards,
Priti

Hi Priti,
I tried restricting records using Named Searhes and Masks but it includes all the records with Match step property Records Vs All. You have to perform some maunal step either by selecting records using some search criteria or you can use Named Searches i.e.
1. Create one field say New of type boolean and by default set it to NO.
2. Create one named search for this field value to YES.
3. Create one assignment which sets the value for this field to YES and add this assignment in the workflow as the first step.
4. When ever you import records, assignment will set New=YES for all the records imported. Now, when you add more records, search the previous records using Restore Named Search function which will give the list of records imported now. You can perform Matching and Merging operation.
5. Add one more assignment to the workflow as the last step which should set New=NO so that records should not appear next time for Matching
Regards,
Jitesh Talreja

How can i populate records using LOV value in form 6i

Create a form based on the following output use EMP Table
Create a non Database Block i.e Control Block----> Dept No
Create a Database Block -EMP
Create an LOV for the Dept no from dept table.
For the Current Dept No . Populate the Employee Records
How can i populate records using LOV value????
thanks

How can i populate records using LOV value in form 6i Start by posting in the correct forum: {forum:id=82}
(Seriously: after making all your previous posts in the Forms forum, how do you end up posting in this one? Is it because the Forms forum has changed category?)

How can i populate records using LOV value

Create a form based on the following output use EMP Table
Create a non Database Block i.e Control Block----> Dept No
Create a Database Block -EMP
Create an LOV for the Dept no from dept table.
For the Current Dept No . Populate the Employee Records
How can i populate records using LOV value????
thanks

Hi maddyd2k
How can i populate records using LOV valueIt's not clear what u r trying to do create, create then want to...
1.Pls Create a non-db item db set to > no named DEPT_NAME
2. when creating the LOV assign the DEPT_NAME FROM DEPT table to that displayed item and u have also to assign the Dept No selected to the Dept No in the emp block
To populate or display DEPT_NAME after Query - the If i got ur problem then - u need to cretae a Post-Query Trigger then use the following...
BEGIN
SELECT DEPT_NAME
INTO :CONTROL_BLOCK.DEPT_NAME
FROM DEPT
WHERE Dept No = :Dept No;
EXCEPTION
WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN NULL;
WHEN OTHERS THEN (ERRTXT);
END;Hope this helps...
Regards,
Abdetu...

What version control system you use?

We are 20 developer and we use bitkeeper as a version control system.
But we have 4 envirronnement.
dev/test/pre-prod/prod.
Sometimes, 2-3 projects are affecting the same packages.
And different packages version is all over the place since we have 4 envirronnements.
What version control system you use for packages?
Would be cool to have a version control system intergrated to our tools, like toad, pl/sql dev or sql developer, is there one for those tools?
Is the tool you using it doing all you want it to do?
Have any link for me to check out?

Hi,
I recommend SourceAnywhere Standalone to you. It is an SQL-based source control application that provides all of the key features of VSS, plus much more. It is well integrated with Microsoft Visual Studio 6/2003/2005/2008, Dreamweaver and Eclipse. Here is the home page of SourceAnywhere Standalone:
http://www.dynamsoft.com/Products/SAWstandalone_Overview.aspx
The Hosted edition, SourceAnywhere Hosted that is delivered as a SaaS application is also available.
http://www.dynamsoft.com/Products/SAWhosted_Overview.aspx
You can take a look.
Thanks,
Catherine Sea
www.dynamsoft.com
the leading developer of version control and issue tracking software
Message was edited by:
Catherine Sea

Re: Pre-Configured Workflow Scenarios

Hi All,
I came to know through the SAP Documentation that some pre-configured Workflow scenarios are available in especially in IDES environment.
I'm looking for some pre-configured Workflow scenarios in ECC environment related to Item/Material/Product create. Please let me know where I can find more information on this and how to consume/use these pre-configured Workflow scenarios.
Thank you
Surender

David/Andy:
Really good points guys. I certainly am not saying Motion should be like AE. I am not starting a thread that is a comparison of the two. Each has it's own workflow, and Andy I think you bring up a really good point. I rarely use clones but they are a powerful tool in the right circumstance. I am curious about more complex design workflows and how some of us push the limits.
David, I agree with your point about keeping Motion simple. Apple is proficient at keeping their software/hardware simple. Software that serves one purpose, or devices that have only a few buttons. The elegance is what we all like.
Additionally, to your point Andy, we can do things withOUT precoming in Motion. Just keeping things in layers is good enough really. Like I said, I'm not really an AE user, but I do understand the concepts. I like the idea of a pre-rendered portion of the animation. Just seems to take the processor intensive portions out of creating complex animations. Moreover I think I am just wondering if I could create more complex animations WITH some of the design workflows that AE offers (like pre-rendering).
At the end of the day I feel like I can do SO much with Motion, and have wiggle room to play around more. I'm definitely excited about a new version of Motion, and to see what sort of new features make it in. Perhaps nodal workflows, perhaps more 3D design tools... we'll see.

Have you used the new workflow features in CM 12?

In CM 12.0, users can optionally deploy the standard
approval processing or new flexible, workflow approval
processing based on the project and/or document. Have you
used the new workflow features? Do you think the new
workflows will allow your organization to better drive and
control internal and multiple party reviews?

I was one of those users who fight for this
functionality.
I find using it however very
unhandy.
Let me give you real
life examples:
1. Once you
create an order/contract and do not choose "New
Method" you cannot change approval method to new any
more. Imagine one of my users was creating an order
with 120 items (hell of typing!) then she spotted that
she cannot send it with new review process to several
reviewers in sequence. The need for retyping it makes
5 other ppl already against this software, even if
they did not used it at all.
2.
Document Owner has admin rights.
For some
reason user needs to be document owner in order to
setup review process. Imagine in our situation usual a
site assistant, or junior person in technical office
is responsible for creating and typing all the
orders/contracts. So this person needs to be Document
Owner in order start review.
Document owner
however can also approve/reject in name of other users
mentioned in review cycle. This I find strange and
make entire new review/approval cycle worthless, as
the situation is still that anyone can approve someone
on someone behalf with no control.
 3. Alerts missing. I couldn't find an alert that
would be generated if a document is held internal (by
user) for more then ... x days.
 4. I'm also missing a Project Setting for "all
documents must use new review process"; "defoult
reviewers is + 'All in sequence' + 'list of reviewers'
- for each kind of document. If
you want to force users to follow a strict
methodology, and your software gives them chance to
choose whomever they want, wherever they want, use any
approval method, approve on someone behalf ... you
will finally fail. I keep
hearing that Primavera sold thousand of licenses, and
they will develop this product, I just hope they will
hurry, before users switch to other software.

Ssr control without the use of pwm

i want to control the heater and a DC motor using the SSR. on checking for the solution i find that PWM with varing duty cycle is the best option but i don't know nothing about PWM and also how to program it on LabVIEW. i have a NI 9403 and NI 9478 DAQcard and other AI/AO cards. i am thinking of controlling the SSR using one of these cards. i am trying to use a simulated signal block (LabVIEW 2010) square wave, try to vary its duty using a PID. now the question is how to send this simulated signal to the SSR using the Available DAQ cards with me. i want to skip usage of PWM because i dont have the time. i want to start the experiments as fast as possible.

this is the vi that i am using to control the heater for temperature control. the DAQ assistant is measuring the temperature using NI 9211 and this temperature is matched with the set point and adjust the duty cycle of the simulated signal, (square wave just like PWM),
i am not actually using a PWM just creating something like PWM, the frequency that i have set is just a hit and trail (i dont know how much to set).
the DAQ assistant2 controls the SSR which in turn ON/OFF the heater according to duty cycle.it's working fine. the same concept i am trying to use in the case of controlling the RPM of a DC motor.
the rpm from the motor controller, that i have, will be fixed to 100 rpm. i will set the setpoint to 60 RPM in the PID, the PID will vary the duty cycle of the simulated signal and will controll the RPM but the question now arise is:
1) from the experience obtained from heater control that i had done, there will be no current flowing to the DC motor because the SSR get fully closed (duty cycle 0) as soon as the process variable goes above the setpoint (60 RPM) and again opens to full (duty cycle 100) as it falls below the set point. i want it to at 50% duty cycle at at set point(60 RPM) and as the RPM decreases it should increase the Duty cycle to adjust the RPM back to 60.
2) now how to acheive this.
i am simultaneously measuring the current and voltage that is going to the DC motor. if the duty cycle goes to zero ( SSR gets closed), i will not be able to measure the current and voltage going to the DC motor. that's why i want the duty cycle to be at 50%.
Attachments:
8 june pid cntrol heater.vi ‏127 KB

Control/Trailer Record - use Pre-Reconciliation Workflow?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for