COPA Assessment - cross company

Can anybody tell me how to solve this issue.
We have to excute one COPA assessment with cross company, but the system always let me to configure the clearing account for these two company codes.
I want to know it is possible to do the assessment without the FI posting ? How to do that ?

Hi Zhe Jin ,
If I understood your issue correctly ..you are trying to execute a COPA Assessment cycle.
Sender Cost Center belongs to one company code.. receiver will be then a Value field.
Can you please let us know what you have mentioned in the receiver tab in the COPA.
Assessment cyle.
Is it a COPA assessment cycle or Cost Center Assessment cycle.
Regards
Sarada

Similar Messages

COPA Assessment - settlement to different Company codes char. values

Hi,
I have some doubts about the COPA assessment possibilities.
I have such a case - where there is one common Controlling area for 3 company codes.
The company code is a characteristic used in my Operating Concern.
I would like to have such a possibility to run the assessment of Administration Cost center in Company code 1 - that would settle its costs to Characteristic values - a group of product indexes and to all company codes (not only to products sold in company code 1, but also in 2 and 3). Is it possible to do it in COPA assessment - or will the system give a warning or error message when trying to settle cost from CC in one comany code to characteristic values in different company codes.
The key I would use for settlement would be the COGS value field.
Best wishes,
Karol

<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7a/4c48c64a0111d1894c0000e829fbbd/frameset.htm">Logic for allocating to company codes, business areas and profit centers</a>
The characteristics Company code, Business area and Profit center are handled differently depending on whether they are specified explicitly in the segment.
If you do not specify them as receiver characteristics, they are copied automatically from the sender to the receiver profitability segments. If you use the receiver rule "Variable portions", the tracing factors are aggregated over all company codes, business areas and profit centers.
If you explicitly specify the characteristics as receivers, distribution occurs using the receiver rule. In particular, cross-company-code, cross-business-area or cross-profit-center postings can be created if the characteristics specified for the sender differ from those entered explicitly for the receiver. In this case, the tracing factors used for the receiver rule "Variable portions" are selected for that particular company code, business area or profit center.

Cross company code posting in assessment cycle

Friends,
I developed one assessment cycle to send from Cost center A ( company code A with USD) to Receiver cost centers B ( company code B with CAD) and Cost center C ( Company Code A and USD), When I do the assessment cycle and check the details it is showing me 100% taken out of sender and assessed to B and C. But when I check cost center report of Cost center A, the credit is not same as the debits ( i made the cycle to take out 100%). When i drilled down in the credits ( sent from assessment cost element), I see object currency to be different from transaction currency ( should be the amount that needs to be credited) even though Object and transactions currencies are in USD.
Any input on why object currency value will be different from transaction currency value even though both are in USD? Is it something because of cross company posting with different currencies? Thanks in advance

Hi,
check SAPNET note 549430 it describes the system beahivour and what you can do.
BR Christian

Cross Company Stock Transfer- Please check excise base for the item is zero

Hi,
My scenario is Cross company Stock transfer (Two different Company Codes)
I have done following steps :
1.Create Purchase Order
2.Create Outbound Delivery for Purchase Order
3.Post Goods Issue for Delivery
4.Creating Billing Document
5.Creating Excise Invoice
6.Printing of Excise Invoice
7.Post Goods Receipt for Stock Transport Order
Till MIGO there is no problem.
I am getting a errro while doing MIGO with reference to Outbound Delivery, when I enter Excise Invoice created in sending plant, I am getting error as
"Please check excise base for the item is zero" - Message no. 4F121
Excise Duty values are flowing as per the excise invoice but system make base value as 0 , I have maintained Assesable value in J1ID also. We are using TAXINN.
Pl. help
Thanks
Vikas

Hi
The best way to slolve this problem, Now is to maintain Assable value in Material Master For reciving Plant.
Hear you can maintain all the chapter id, register A or C, etc
and then try doing GR,
The other way and the permanent solution is
VPRS or equivalent
Condition class B Prices
Calculat.type C Quantity
Condit.category H
Cond.control H Condition value fixed
Condit.origin A Automatic pricing
In this Condition category is most important and by this only system copies the base amount for excise duty calculation in MIGO or J1IEX.
Regs
Niti Narayan

COPA Assessment Cycle using KEU5 for multiple controlling areas

Hello All,
There is an organization with operations in several countries. There is a separate controlling area for each country. There is one controlling area, for instance, for Germany and another for Netherlands.
A problem is encountered while executing transaction KEU5 for multiple controlling areas in parallel. For instance, when one user from Germany executes KEU5 for an assessment cycle for Germany controlling area and at the same time another user from Netherlands tries to execute KEU5 for a cycle for NL controlling area, the user from Netherlands encounters an error message u201C'Cycle XXXX 01.02.2008 cannot be started because run group 0000 is locked'.
Apparently SAP allows assessment cycles for exactly one controlling area to be executed together. This poses a problem since the organization plans to implement SAP in several other countries (There will be one separate controlling area for each country as per the organization structure adopted by the company).
Any ideas, views or suggestions on the aforesaid issue would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Soumya

Hi Soumya,
Did you find any text in SAP Documentation saying that "SAP does not allow cycles belonging to different controlling areas to be executed at the same time"...?
Pls find the following text from SAP Help...
Parallel Processing of Cycles of an Allocation Type
Use
Parallel processing of cycles results in considerable time savings. To process cycles of one allocation type in parallel, they must be assigned to different cycle run groups.
You define the cycle run groups in the cycle header data. You also assign cycles to the cycle run groups in the header data.
To process the cycles of a cycle run group in parallel, start the cycles one after the other, if required, in different sessions.
You are carrying out a cross-company code cost accounting and want to perform the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel. Create a cycle run group for each company code and assign the appropriate cycles to these groups. You can then carry out the actual assessment in the individual company codes in parallel.
When you execute a cycle, you can start a consistency check. The system checks whether you are allowed to execute the selected cycles in parallel.
Though I didn't come across such requirement, I feel, my earlier suggestion will work out...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Wrong Posting in CO-PA for 3rd Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

Hi,
In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost. CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
Waiting for the help.
Best regards,
Joby

In user exit include ZXKKEU03 you should make the COPA COGS equal to the VPRS. Also you can't do a revaluation in COPA for the third party billing types.
pls assign points to say thanks.

FAGLGA11 - Assessments Cross Company Codes

Does anyone know if its possible to create an Assessment in SAP across company codes? It appeas that standard SAP doesnt allow for this - can anyone let me know if its possible, or if there are other alternatives?

Hello Robert,
it is not allowed to have cross company code assessments and distributions as each company code is considered as legal entity!
Best regards,
Daniela

Cross company payment through F-53, error in Check deposit & check issue tr

Hi
I have just joined the community and ready with 3 queries.
Please.......... help me to resolve.
i) While executing the cross company payment ( company code 1300 making payment for vendor in company code 0013) using transaction code F-53, I am getting error 'vendor not defined in company code 1300'.
For F-53 screen, vendor is selected from company code 0013.
I have executed APP (F110) successfully in company code 1300 for paying the same vendor in company code 0013.
ii) For check deposit transaction, error is " entry 1300 is missing in table TO43S'. (1300 is a company code)
iii) For check issue transaction, error is "no batch input data for screen SAPMF05A'
Thanks
Rekha

1. Don't give vendor number in the main screen, give all remaining inouts and press enter, then it'll show the second screen
there you can give the company code and vendor account.
2. Cretae a tolerance group for GL accounts in OBA0.
Don't post more than one query in the same thread.
Rgds
Murali. N

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Stock report for cross-company sales

Dear all,
We are using for our Saudi Arabia company the cross-company sales process with sourcing unit in another country.
There is a Legal requirement in Saudi to provide a Stock report (with "stock in", "stock out" quantities and values).
But with the cross-company sales process the stock movements are not visible in Saudi.
Any advice ? Is there a report in SAP for this legal reqirement in Saudi Arabia ?
Best regards

Hi,
Try to use t-code MB51, will give you a list with the relevant movement types!
Good luck
Tao

Missing CO Sales Order Item in 643 Cross Company Movement

Hi all,
we are working in a make-to-order scenario in which the company A/plant A sells a finished product produced by company B/plant B.
The sales order item is a cost object (account assignment category E – “Ind. cust. w. KD-CO” is set in the requirement class in use) and is derived into the Transfer Order (Account Assignment tab) from production company B/plant B to selling company A/plant A.
When we try to transfer the finished product from plant B to plant A by means of 643 movement the system provides error message KI 235 – Account xxx requires an assignment to a CO object where xxx is the Cost Of Goods Sold for company B. This is due to the fact that FI is not able to derive the sales order item as a posting cost object.
We have activated cross company CO objects by deactivating the Company Code Validation indicator (field TKA00-RKBUK) for controlling area settings.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
PierGiorgio

Hi Abhi,
yes it is: "E" is the entry value in the field consumption of the requirement class involved.
Thanks, PierGiorgio

Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

Hi,
I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
Thank you very much!!!!

Hi,
Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
The Process is as follows
a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
The process is as follows
a. Customer raises normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
the material should be extended to both the plants
a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
Hope this is clear.
Thanks
Praveen

Problem in GRN while Capturing Excise Invoice in Cross Company STO Scenario

Dear All,
In the Cross Company STO Scenario we are following the steps as below:-
1.) Creation of the purchase order to the supplying plant of type u201CNBu201D
2.) Creation of the Outbound delivery in VL10B
3.) Post Good Issue in the VL02N.
4.) Creation of the billing doc.
5.) Creation of the Excise Invoice.
6.) MIGO w.r.t to the Outbound delivery in the receiving plant
During MIGO ,initialy system is picking the excise rates and excise base value by its own from the purchase order and the moment when we refer the Excise Excise Invoice created in the supplying plant , system takes the Excise rates from the excise invoice created in the supplying plant and Excise Base value is becoming ZERO and we are getting the error :u201D *Please check excise base for the item is ZERO
Message no : 4F121
Please Suggest what to do and why this error is coming.
When I am giving any other Excise no is the Excise Invoice feild in MIGO , it is taking and refering the rates in PO and giving one information message that Excise invoice no is different from the supplying plant excise invoice no.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin

HI,
Check the excise base vlaue in the Supplying plant excise invoice. If its 0, maintain the assessible value in J1ID & Check.
If everything is found OK, check if any SAP notes are available.
Thanks & Regards,

Trading Parner Not Inherited to Cross Company Balance Sheet Line item

Hi,
I posted cross company document using document type that is already untick in field 'inter-company posting' and 'enter tpid'.
My accounting entries is as per below:
   Co1000   Cr Balance Sheet   $250
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $10
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $240
Upon posting, TPID only populated in the cross-company code clearing line item only. Not to all of the GL line item.
However;
1) If using the same set of data (cross company posting) whereby the Balance Sheet line is replaced with P&L account, the posted document will inherit TPID to all line item.
2) If posting in single company's book, using related party customer account with the same balance sheet as per example above, TPID is inherited to the BS line item. example is as per below:
     Co1000 Dr Customer1001   $300
     Co1000 Cr balance Sheet    $300
Is there any reason or notes that can be implemented so that for cross company transaction that contains BS account, TPID is being populated in all line item?
TQ.

Hi,
If the Trading Partner is maintained in OX16 and you are still getting this problem then, please refer to OSS Note No.:779844 and 438076.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

Hello Guys,
I have a problem related to cross company code transaction.
In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks
Rafael B.

Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
The document was created in 2010.
This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
More suggestions?
Regards.
Rafael

COPA Assessment - cross company

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for